Private Equity Transactions Provides a Return to the Managers on an Exit If the Across the United States, Sponsor Realizes a Minimum Return on Its Investment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Private Equity Transactions Provides a Return to the Managers on an Exit If the Across the United States, Sponsor Realizes a Minimum Return on Its Investment Q32015 GLOBAL PrivateUPDATE Equity A Comparison of subscription price for the sweet equity is often set at a low amount, with some form of performance ratchet or Management Incentive hurdle, such that there is little or no value in the sweet Equity Arrangements in equity on subscription. The sweet equity then only Private Equity Transactions provides a return to the managers on an exit if the Across the United States, sponsor realizes a minimum return on its investment. Europe and Asia This often allows the managers to minimize income By Timothy Gardner, James Harvey, Michael Nissan, tax costs on acquisitions while ensuring that exit Sumit Ram and Amanda Rosenblum proceeds are taxed at the prevailing capital gain rate rather than as ordinary income. Introduction United States: In the United States the nature of the securities or interests held by managers is A key feature of private equity transactions is ensuring more varied, with managers typically holding either that management, who will be asked to deliver on options exercisable into ordinary equity, profits the company’s business plan, are appropriately interests or, occasionally, leveraged common equity incentivized and aligned with the sponsor to share (common equity subordinated to preferred equity in the future growth of the company. This is typically so as to depress entry value), with vesting of these achieved with incentive equity arrangements put in interests subject to continued service and the overall place at the time of the sponsor’s acquisition of, or performance of the business or investment. The investment in, the company. In this article we look at choice between these different interests is driven by the approaches taken to management incentive equity tax considerations and the negotiating strength of arrangements for sponsor-backed transactions in the management: options giving rise to ordinary income United States, Europe and Asia. treatment but a compensation deduction benefit in the hands of the company, and profits interests and equity Observations giving rise to capital gains treatment for the managers, Europe: The common position across the vast but no compensation deduction for the company. majority of European jurisdictions is for managers to Asia: The position across Asia is also more varied, be issued ordinary (sweet) equity, sitting alongside and in general there is no settled market standard for the sponsor’s interest held across a mix of securities, management equity incentive arrangements, although including for example ordinary and preferred equity it is more common for management in transactions in and shareholder loans (the institutional strip). The 2015 Private Equity Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP UPDATES Global Private Equity Update China to be given equity incentive awards that vest Transferability purely over time with no performance requirements, Ensuring that management incentive interests are held whereas in the Hong Kong market managers are only for the benefit of management is also important commonly issued with a mix of ordinary equity as well and, therefore, general prohibitions on transfers by as options exercisable into ordinary equity and which a manager of equity or other incentive interests are are linked to future business performance. In other an almost universal feature in arrangements across markets we see features similar to both Europe and the United States, Europe and Asia. Similarly, if a the United States. manager ceases to be employed by the company Pooling Vehicles (i.e., becomes a “leaver”), that manager may no longer be allowed to retain some or all of his/her The use of a pooling vehicle controlled by the incentive interests. Across Europe it is typical for the company (and ultimately the sponsor) to hold at least leaving manager to be required to transfer equity (for more junior managers’ equity interests is becoming example to a new incoming manager, or perhaps a increasingly common in European transactions. This warehouse vehicle to be recycled later). In the United allows for greater control of management’s incentive States, unvested options or equity will typically lapse, equity as well as easing the administrative burden, with any vested equity being subject to a repurchase since the company will only have one management right by the company. The price paid for equity being shareholder entity to deal with, as opposed to many transferred or repurchased is determined by the individual management shareholders. Use of such circumstances of the manager’s leaving, with a “good vehicles is not common in the United States with leaver” typically being entitled to receive a higher managers typically holding their interests directly with, amount than a “bad leaver” on vested equity. less frequently, junior managers holding phantom equity through a profits interest structure. Across Asia While each transaction is different, there are a transactions, pooling vehicles are sometimes used in number of areas where it is possible to find a larger transactions but (in some markets, like China) generally settled position and, accordingly, we set are often controlled by the company’s founders rather out below a summary of certain of the key terms and than the company itself. some of the more common positions adopted. Right Europe United States Asia Type of Interests Held Class of Security ■■ Rollover of existing equity: ■■ Rollover of existing equity: ■■ Rollover of existing equity: ordinary equity or into a strip of same mix of securities as typically ordinary equity or ordinary equity and preferred sponsor (pari passu save equity-linked securities equity and/or shareholder for company’s call right over ■■ loans alongside sponsor manager held equity on Incentive equity: varies, but, becoming a leaver) e.g.: (i) in Hong Kong, options ■■ Incentive equity: ordinary linked to future performance or equity, sometimes with a ■■ Incentive equity: non-qualified equity with a hurdle linked to ratchet or hurdle, or similar, stock options (exercisable a minimum sponsor return on such that the sweet equity into common stock), profits exit; or (ii) in China, shares and only provides a return once interests or, occasionally, not options a minimum return has been leveraged common stock achieved by the sponsor on (common stock subordinated exit to preferred stock to depress value) Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Q3 2015 2 Global Private Equity Update Right Europe United States Asia Vesting for Incentive Equity ■■ Time vesting over e.g. a four or ■■ Combination of both time ■■ Combination of both time five year period, annually or on vesting and performance vesting and performance a straight line basis (see also vesting for both options and vesting: leaver price below) other incentive equity: ■■ Time vesting over e.g. a ■■ Time-vesting component: four or five year period four to five years ■■ Performance vesting: ■■ Performance vesting return-based and/or component: return-based operating based (e.g. (multiple of investment EBITDA) performance and/or IRR) and/or metrics operating based (e.g. EBITDA) performance metrics Voting Rights ■■ Varies but often voting ■■ Varies but often voting ■■ Usually voting Anti-Dilution Rights ■■ None (although see pre- ■■ None (although see pre- ■■ None (although see pre- emption rights below) emption rights below) emption rights below) Pre-emption on New Issues of ■■ Pro rata pre-emption rights, ■■ Usually for rollover equity only ■■ Usually for rollover equity only Securities with exceptions for: ■■ Sometimes for vested incentive ■■ Acquisition issues equity ■■ Emergency issues (for example to avoid imminent default under the company’s financing arrangements) with managers having a subsequent catch-up ■■ Issues under a management incentive plan up to a certain percentage of equity Terms of Loan Notes / ■■ Varies, but between 10% ■■ N/A ■■ N/A in most cases Preference Shares / and12% interest, PIK often Shareholder Debt seen Management Rollover ■■ Often about 50% of post-tax ■■ Determined on a case-by-case ■■ Determined on a case-by-case Percentage proceeds basis (50% post-tax proceeds basis would not be unusual) Use of a Pooling Vehicle to ■■ Senior managers hold directly, ■■ Use of pooling vehicles not ■■ For larger transactions Hold Management Interests with more junior managers common. Senior managers management’s equity is holding through a pooling usually hold equity interests sometimes held through a vehicle/co controlled by the directly; junior managers hold pooling vehicle controlled company either directly or, occasionally, either by the founder (if may have phantom equity applicable) or the company interest instead Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Q3 2015 3 Global Private Equity Update Right Europe United States Asia Leaver Provisions Which Securities are Subject ■■ Incentive equity only ■■ Incentive equity and typically ■■ Varies, but incentive and to Leaver Repurchase rollover equity rollover equity often subject to Provisions? leaver provisions Types of / Reasons for ■■ Good leaver – manager who ■■ “Cause” or when “cause” exists ■■ No fixed position–both United Becoming a Leaver leaves due to: States and European positions ■■ Resignation without Good seen in recent deals ■■ Death or incapacity Reason ■■ Redundancy or retirement ■■ Death ■■ Wrongful dismissal ■■ Disability ■■ Sale of that manager’s ■■ Termination without Cause part of the business ■■ Resignation with Good Reason ■■ Designated by the board ■■ as a good leaver Retirement (not as typical) ■■ Bad leaver - a manager who leaves due to any
Recommended publications
  • INVESTMENT VENDORS  the Following Is a Listing of the Investment Managers, Custodians, and Consultants That Serve the Massachusetts Public Pension Systems
    INVESTMENT VENDORS The following is a listing of the investment managers, custodians, and consultants that serve the Massachusetts public pension systems. The listing is based on information supplied by the retirement boards. RETIREMENT BOARD INVESTMENT VENDORS ADAMS • Capital Research and Management • Granite Investment Advisors Custodian: State Street Bank & Trust AMESBURY • PRIT ANDOVER • PRIT ARLINGTON • PRIT • Wilshire Associates Inc. Custodian: State Street Bank & Trust ATTLEBORO • Boston Advisors, LLC • Herndon Capital Management, LLC • PRIT Custodian: People’s United Bank • Daruma Capital Management, LLC • Invesco Core Real Estate USA, LP • Regions Timberland Consultant: Dahab Associates Inc. • Fidelity Institutional Asset Management • Invesco National Trust Company • State Street Global Advisors • Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC • Orleans Capital Management Corp. • Wells Capital Management Inc. • Hancock Natural Resource Group, Inc. BARNSTABLE COUNTY • Intercontinental Capital Management, LLC • PRIT • UBS Realty Investors, LLC BELMONT • AEW Capital Management, LP • Loomis Sayles & Company • RhumbLine Advisers Custodian: State Street Bank & Trust • Atlanta Capital • Pacific Investment Management Company, LLC • Rothschild Asset Management Inc. Consultant: New England Pension • Harbourvest Partners, LLC • PRIT • Scout Capital Management, LLC Consultants BERKSHIRE COUNTY • PRIT BEVERLY • PRIT BLUE HILLS REGIONAL • PRIT BOSTON (CITY) • 57 Stars, LLC • EnTrust Partners, LLC • Permal Asset Management, Inc. Custodian: State
    [Show full text]
  • Facility Services INDUSTRY UPDATE | Winter 2020 Houlihan Lokey Facility Services Update
    Facility Services INDUSTRY UPDATE | Winter 2020 Houlihan Lokey Facility Services Update Dear Clients and Friends, Houlihan Lokey is pleased to present its Facility Services Industry Update for winter 2020. We have included important news stories, transaction announcements, a public markets overview and industry insights to help you stay ahead in our dynamic and constantly evolving industry. We have also highlighted several recent deals in the sector that Houlihan Lokey worked on in 2019. We hope that you will find this quarterly newsletter to be informative and that it serves as a valuable resource to you in staying up-to-date on the market. If there is additional content you would find useful for future updates, please don’t hesitate to call or email us with your suggestions. We look forward to staying in touch with you. Regards, Larry DeAngelo Jon Harrison Jeff Ackerman Head of Business Managing Director Director London New York Services Atlanta [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 44 (0) 20 7747 7564 212.497.7866 404.495.7019 Additional Facility Services Group Contacts Jordan Mendel Leon Vayntraub Brandon Bleakley [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 646.259.7465 212.497.7899 646.259.7488 Jason Weisbaum Caroline Weakland Yash Srivastav [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 212.497.4265 212.497.7916 212.497.7863 Industry Sectors Covered AVIATION SERVICES FOODSERVICE HVAC AND PLUMBING JANITORIAL LANDSCAPING LAUNDRY PEST CONTROL RESIDENTIAL SERVICES SECURITY 2 Select Recent Transactions Headquartered in Irving, Texas, G2 Secure Staff (G2) is leading provider of mission-critical ground handling and aviation support services to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PEI Investor Relations, Marketing & Communications Forum 2019
    June 19-20 | Convene, 730 Third Ave | New York Attendee list A.P. Moller Capital Bain Capital C-Bridge Capital Partners FTV Capital ACME Capital Banner Real Estate Group CCMP Capital Advisors Further Capital Partners Actis Barings Centerbridge Partners GCM Grosvenor Advent International Basis Investment Group Cerberus Capital Management General Atlantic AE Industrial Partners Battery Ventures Charlesbank Capital Partners General Catalyst Partners AEA Investors BBH Capital Partners The Chauncey F. Lufkin III Gennx360 AEW Capital Management BC Partners Foundation Genstar Capital AIMA The Beach Company The City of New York, Finance Global Infrastructure Partners Alcentra Berkshire Partners Civitas Capital Grain Management Alcion Ventures Bernhard Capital Partners Coller Capital Gryphon Investors Allianz Capital Partners Bicknell Family Holding Cornell Capital GTCR Altor Equity Partners Company Court Square Capital Partners Halstatt American Securities Bison Crescent Capital Group Hamilton Lane AMP Capital BKM Capital Partners CRV Hammes Angelo Gordon Blackstone Cypress Real Estate Advisors Hammond, Kennedy, Whitney Antares Capital Blue Heron Asset Managment Denham Capital & Co Apollo Global Management Blue Water Energy Duff & Phelps Hancock Capital Management ARC Financial Corp Bridge Investment Group Dyal Capital Partners Harvard Management Company ArcLight Capital Partners BroadVail Capital Edelman HCI Equity Partners Argosy Capital Brook Venture Partners EnCap Investments HGGC Arroyo Energy Investment Brookfield Asset Management EQT Partners
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing Diversity April Evans Wants More Women in Private Equity
    Issue 166 • November 2018 • www.privatefundsmanagement.net FINANCE • LEGAL • COMPLIANCE • OPERATIONS • TAX PUSHING DIVERSITY APRIL EVANS WANTS MORE WOMEN IN PRIVATE EQUITY CYBER-RISK MANAGEMENT SWEDEN SOUR DRIVING TECH IN PE How are you protecting The country rules carry is What you need to know about your data? taxed as income blockchain and AI Local Insight. Global Thinking. EisnerAmper provides services to leading investment advisors in the global private equity marketplace. We have a dedicated and well-established private equity funds group providing services to private equity firms and their portfolio companies. Our approach is to provide our clients with smart, analytical insights delivered with a personal touch. We build strong and lasting client relationships by creating trust through clear and open communication. Our value lies in helping clients get to where they need to be and supporting them along the way; making global local. EisnerAmperGlobal.com Learn more at EisnerAmper.com/PE and check out our global capabilities at Global and national Provide services Gives fresh local & Offer customized capabilities that: to all sizes global perspectives services & innovative approaches EisnerAmper provides a comprehensive range of services, including: Buy-side due diligence Tax structuring and consulting C Tax due diligence and structuring G LO Auditing funds and performance N S Portfolio company audit TI I S N E G V PRIVATE EQUITY N I FUND SERVICES • Business Plan Modeling • GP Structuring • Audit and Tax Services • SEC Reporting • Deal Structuring M • Tax Structuring and Compliance A X • Estate/Wealth Planning I M I Z G I N N I T G I X G E R O W T H IT structuring and efficiencies Sell-side due diligence Bolt-on acquisition consulting Tax advisory EisnerAmper Global is a company limited by guarantee incorporated in the United Kingdom under theEisnerAmper Companies Global Act 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 904 2 FY 16 Boilerplate Report-Fiscal Year
    Michigan Public Schools Pension - MPSERS RATES OF RETURN - GROSS Periods Ending December 31, 2015 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY REPORT MKT VAL $ % of 10 Years 7 Years 5 Years 3 Years 1 Year Qtr 1 Month ITD Incept Date TOTAL PLAN TOTAL PUBLIC SCHOOL 42,576,509,651 100.0 6.60 10.07 9.16 10.02 2.79 2.02 -0.65 9.34 01-01-79 1 MPSERS TOTAL PLAN POLICY 6.41 10.77 8.86 9.26 2.24 1.74 -0.92 DOMESTIC EQUITY TOTAL DOMESTIC EQUITY 11,853,289,003 27.8 7.38 15.04 12.11 15.04 -0.49 5.37 -1.85 9.12 09-01-91 S&P COMPOSITE 1500 7.41 14.97 12.39 14.90 1.01 6.59 -1.88 TOTAL ACTIVE EQUITY 6,748,413,351 15.9 7.27 15.00 11.93 15.01 -1.77 4.39 -1.90 10.46 01-01-79 2 SP1500 7.41 14.97 12.39 14.90 1.01 6.59 -1.88 TOTAL INTERNAL ACTIVE 4,035,653,434 9.5 6.87 14.34 11.48 14.32 -2.70 3.24 -2.31 4.64 02-01-00 S&P 500 7.31 14.81 12.57 15.13 1.38 7.04 -1.58 4.42 LARGE CAP CORE 1,689,173,074 4.0 15.42 12.09 15.27 -7.31 -1.64 -3.08 6.49 08-01-07 S&P 500 14.81 12.57 15.13 1.38 7.04 -1.58 6.41 LARGE CAP GROWTH 1,235,145,135 2.9 9.16 17.48 14.36 18.66 5.99 8.51 -1.13 2.64 01-01-00 3 SP500 GROWTH BLEND 8.78 16.56 14.06 17.19 5.52 7.86 -1.52 3.24 4 ALL CAP GARP 735,823,088 1.7 8.66 15.26 -0.14 6.26 -2.16 16.50 04-01-09 S&P COMPOSITE 1500 12.39 14.90 1.01 6.59 -1.88 17.58 CONCENTRATED EQUITY FUND 284,249,262 0.7 -10.37 4.39 -2.96 0.24 05-01-13 S&P COMPOSITE 1500 1.01 6.59 -1.88 11.73 LARGE CAP VALUE 73,204,655 0.2 4.15 10.01 8.45 10.20 -7.57 3.71 -2.59 5.50 01-01-00 5 SP500 VALUE BLEND 5.69 12.96 10.96 12.83 -3.13 6.05 -1.68 4.72 ABSOLUTE RETURN INCOME FUND 0 0.0 01-01-09 60% S&P 500/40%
    [Show full text]
  • CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC (“CCMP”) Exclusively for Attendees of the Independent Petroleum Association of America Private Capital Conference
    February 2011 Disclaimer This presentation has been prepared by CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC (“CCMP”) exclusively for attendees of the Independent Petroleum Association of America Private Capital Conference. This presentation contains confidential and proprietary information relating to CCMP and its managed funds and portfolio investments, including CCMP Capital Investors II, L.P. and its parallel regulatory vehicles and alternative vehicles (collectively, “Fund II” or “CCMP Fund II”) and J.P. Morgan Partners Global Investors, L.P. and its parallel regulatory vehicles and alternative vehicles (collectively, the “Global Fund”). All recipients agree that they will keep confidential all information contained herein and not already in the public domain. Any reproduction or distribution of this presentation, in whole or in part, or the disclosure of its contents, without the prior written consent of CCMP is prohibited. By accepting this presentation, each recipient agrees to the foregoing. The portfolio company descriptions contained herein are believed to be reliable, but CCMP and its affiliates do not warrant to their completeness or accuracy and such descriptions are not intended to be complete descriptions of such entities. All opinions, estimates and forecasts of future performance are based on information available to CCMP and its affiliates as of the date of this publication, and are subject to change. The information in this report has not been audited or reviewed by independent public accountants (unless otherwise indicated). The information contained in this presentation is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. On August 1, 2006, the buyout and growth equity investment team of J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Vendors
    INVESTMENT VENDORS The following is a listing of the investment managers, custodians, and consultants that serve the Massachusetts public pension systems. The listing is based on information supplied by the retirement boards. Retirement Investment Vendors Board Adams • PRIT Amesbury • PRIT Andover • PRIT • RhumbLine Advisers Consultant: Dahab Associates Arlington • PRIT Custodian: People’s United Bank Attleboro • Amalgated Bank • Hancock Timber Resource Group, Inc. • PRIT Custodian: People’s United Bank • BTG Pactual Timberland Investment Group • Intercontinental Real Estate Corp. • RhumbLine Advisers Consultant: Dahab Associates Inc. • Copeland Capital Management • Invesco Core Real Estate USA, LP • State Street Global Advisors • Fidelity Institutional Asset Management • Invesco National Trust Company • Van Eck • Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC • Peregrine Capital Barnstable County • PRIT Belmont • AEW Capital Management, LP • HarbourVest Partners, LLC • PRIT Custodian: People’s United Bank • Atlanta Capital • Loomis, Sayles & Company • RhumbLine Advisers Consultant: NEPC, LLC • Carillion Tower Advisors • Pacific Investment Management Company, LLC • Rothschild Asset Management Inc. Berkshire County • PRIT Beverly • PRIT Blue Hills Regional • PRIT Boston (City) • 57 Stars, LLC • EnTrust Global Partners • Polunin Capital Partners • AEW Capital Management, LP • Goldentree Asset Management, LP • Prudential Capital Partners Custodian: State Street Bank & Trust • Alcentra NY, LLC • Grosvenor Capital Management, LP • Prudential
    [Show full text]
  • Shareholder Meeting
    17 June 2009 HarbourVest Global Private Equity Limited Informal Meeting for Shareholders Welcome Sir Michael Bunbury Chairman, HVPE HarbourVest and HVPE Attendees Sir Michael Bunbury Chairman of HVPE D. Brooks Zug Senior Managing Director and Founder of HarbourVest; Director of HVPE George Anson Managing Director of HarbourVest; Director of HVPE Steve Belgrad CFO of HVPE Amanda McCrystal Head of Investor Relations and Communications for HVPE 2 Agenda I. Welcome Sir Michael Bunbury II. Overview of the Manager – HarbourVest D. Brooks Zug III. HVPE Review Steve Belgrad • Financial Highlights • Portfolio • Commitments and Balance Sheet • Trading and Investor Relations • HVPE Outlook IV. Outlook for Private Equity George Anson V. Summary / Questions and Answers Steve Belgrad 6/1/2009 3 Overview of the Manager – HarbourVest D. Brooks Zug Senior Managing Director and Founder, HarbourVest Director, HVPE Overview of the Investment Manager – HarbourVest Partners Largest Private Independent, 100% owner-managed private equity fund-of-funds Equity Founders began private equity investing in 1978 Fund-of-Funds Manager with Total capital raised over 25 years of $30 billion Experienced, Global 78 investment professionals in Boston, London and Hong Kong Team together with a support staff of more than 140 Focus on three private equity investment strategies: primary Consistent partnerships, secondary investments, direct investments Private Equity Strategy Four principal product lines: U.S. fund-of-funds, non-U.S. fund-of-funds, secondary-focused funds, direct / co-investment funds Demonstrated One of the longest track records in the industry Upper Quartile Achieved by the same professionals that manage the portfolio today Investment Demonstrated top quartile performance across all private equity Performance strategies1 __________________ Note: (1) Where relevant benchmarks exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Attendee List
    May 15-16 | Convene, 730 Third Ave | New York ATTENDEE LIST ABS Capital Partners Duane Morris LL LaSalle Investment Management SFW Capital Partners ACA Compliance Group Foreside Financial Group Latham & Watkins Shoreview Industries Advent International Corporation Frontier Capital Leerink Transformation Partners Siguler Guff & Company, LP Alaric Compliance Services Gatewood Capital Partners Leonard Green & Partners Silver Lake Alinda Capital Partners Gauge Capital Levine Leichtman Capital Partners Siris AlpInvest Partners General Atlantic LLC LLR Partners Siris Capital Group, LLC Altpoint Capital Partners LP Gennx360 Capital Partners LS Power SkyView Investment Advisors LLC Am Fam Ventures GI Partners Malk Partners Spell Capital Partners LLC APAX Partners Glade Brook Capital Partners Mountain Capital Management, LLC Starr Investment Holdings LLC Apax Partners LP Golden Gate Capital New Mountain Stellex Capital Management LP Ascendant Compliance Management Grain Management, LLC Oak Hill Capital Partners StepStone Group Audax Group Great Hill Partners Onex Stone Point Capital Bain Capital, LP Greystar Ottawa Avenue Private Capital Stonepeak Partners Barings Greywolf Capital Management LP Palladium Equity Partners, LLC Stripes Group BC Partners GTCR Pantheon Ventures Sun Capital Partners Inc Beacon Capital Partners GTIS Partners Parthenon Capital Tailwind Capital Blue Wolf Capital Partners Hamilton Lane Pavilion Capital TCV Bridge Investment Group Partners LLC The Hampshire Companies Pepper Hamilton LLP Thomas H Lee Partners Brookfield Asset Management HealthCare Royalty Partners Performance Equity Management USAA Real Estate Cabot Properties Hillwood PGIM, Inc. – Prudential Capital Group U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Calvert Street Capital Partners Iron Point Partners Providence Equity Partners Vector Capital CCMP Capital Irving Place Capital Resource Capital Funds Versa Capital Management, LLC Certares Management LLC J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Aon New Mountain V Investment Summary
    Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Proprietary and Confidential Investment Summary Global Investment Management New Mountain Partners V, L.P. April 2017 Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources. Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Proprietary and Confidential Executive Summary Overall Rating New Mountain Capital, LLC (“New Mountain” or the “Firm”) has generated consistent performance across various market cycles while achieving a very low loss rate as a result of its downside focused investment approach and prudent use of leverage. New Mountain has built out a strong team with numerous long tenured senior investment professionals and is capable of executing the Firm’s strategy in New Mountain Partners V, L.P. (“Fund V” or the “Fund”). Category Rating Business Staff Process Risk Operations Performance Terms &Conditions AHIC has reviewed performed an in-depth analysis of the above categories which includes, but is not limited to: .Retention of Limited Partners .Complementary Skill Sets .Market Opportunity .Institutional Investor Representation .Alignment of Interest .Stability of Strategy .Management Company Ownership .Turnover/Tenure .Investment Restrictions .Reporting Transparency .Depth of Team Resources .Approval process .Back-office Resources .Management Team Network .Ability to handle troubled deals .Firm Leadership .Exit strategy .Size of Fund .Consistency / Volatility of Returns .Management Fee and Offsets .Ability to Create Value in Deals .Realization Record .Priority of Distributions .Quality of Source .Unrealized Portfolio Performance .Clawback .Valuation Discipline .Write-Offs .Investment Period .Sole or Consortium Deals .Transaction Experience in Strategy .No Fault Divorce .Overlap with Prior Portfolios .GP Attribution Concentration .Key Man .Advisory Board In addition, AHIC’s Operational Due Diligence Team has reviewed the Firm from an operating perspective and has given New Mountain a passing rating.
    [Show full text]
  • The 35 Most Sought-After Managers
    The 35 Most Sought-After Managers US Large LBO - Q3 2017 First in the Secondary Market. Introduction The ‘Most Sought-After Manager Rankings’ are published by Setter on a quarterly and semi-annual basis to capture the ebb and flow of secondary demand across various fund strategies and geographies. The rankings are largely based on the Setter Liquidity Rating, which assigns funds a rating of Excellent, Very Good, Good or Unrated depending on the number of secondary buyers that want to buy and/or have recently priced a given fund. Please see Definitions at the end of this report for more details. The number of interested buyers for a given fund are determined by Setter’s team of professionals who passionately track the ever changing shortlists and demand of over 1300 secondary buyers both directly and via SecondaryLink.com, where buyers can enter their shortlists and connect with agents and access deals through the Deal Section. From a primary perspective, the ‘Most Sought-After Manager Rankings’ provide a unique perspective as strong secondary market demand suggests a fund manager is popular among LPs and low secondary market demand may signal diminishing market sentiment and additional future liquidity risk. We hope you enjoy! © 2017 Setter Capital Inc. All rights reserved. 2 | P a g e The 35 Most Sought-After Managers on the Secondary Market Strategy: US Large LBO - Q3 2017 Setter Funds in Prior Prime First Rank Liquidity Fund Rank Fund Family Buyers Vintage Latest Closed funds Currency Fund Size Vintage Rating Family 1 — 1 Blackstone
    [Show full text]
  • Title Month, Year
    CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY OR DISTRIBUTE S7.GIPS.03.19.24 PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OCTAGON SENIOR SECURED CREDIT FUND MARCH 20, 2019 OCTAGON CREDIT INVESTORS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FIRM OVERVIEW 2 II. SENIOR SECURED CREDIT FUND 13 III. MARKET OUTLOOK 25 IV. EXHIBITS 31 1 OCTAGON CREDIT INVESTORS S E C T I O N I I. FIRM OVERVIEW 2 OCTAGON CREDIT INVESTORS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS • Octagon, a $22.3B investment management firm, has 24 years of experience managing bank loan investments with a cohesive senior management team and a global client base. • Octagon’s Investment Committee has been together for at least 15 years through multiple credit cycles. • Octagon believes in active management, focusing on constant relative value analysis and fundamental, bottom up credit research. • Octagon currently owns ~640 individual credits1 on behalf of all client portfolios. • Octagon’s historical loan default rate is less than 1/3 of the average index default rate.2 • Octagon is a Top 10 primary loan trading counterparty with most of the major desks on the street in the senior loan market. • Total 2018 Octagon trading volume = $21.0B • Average annual Octagon trading volume over three years3 = $18.5B • Clients benefit from Octagon’s relationships: • Early looks • Ability to provide feedback on new deals • Sizeable allocation • Top-Decile Performance for the Senior Secured Credit Fund: • 72 of 73 12-month rolling periods since the Fund’s inception have generated positive returns to investors.4 • Octagon’s Senior Secured Credit Fund ranks 2nd, 7th, and 4th on a 1, 3 and 5 year total return basis, respectively, with a #1 ranking for Sharpe Ratio since inception versus peers.5 1.
    [Show full text]