DOCSLIB.ORG

STREET HARASSMENT Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Portugal, Sweden, United Kingdom, USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STREET HARASSMENT Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Portugal, Sweden, United Kingdom, USA E-Avis ISDC 18-020 STREET HARASSMENT Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Portugal, Sweden, United Kingdom, USA Current to: 10.08.2018 Please refer to as: K.Nadakavukaren / A. Aronovitz / S. De Dycker / J. Fournier / C. Viennet / H. Westermark, Street Harassment, current to : 10.08.2018, E-Avis ISDC 2018-20, available on www.isdc.ch. This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. The Swiss Institute of Comparative Law does not accept liability for any other use of the text. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the Institute. E-Avis ISDC Série de publications électroniques d’avis de droit de l’ISDC / Elektronische Publikationsreihe von Gutachten des SIR / Serie di pubblicazioni elettroniche di pareri dell’Istituto svizzero di diritto comparato / Series of Electronic Publications of Legal Opinions of the SICL 18-074 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 5 II. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ........................................................................................................... 7 III. VERGLEICHENDE RESULTATE ................................................................................................. 8 A. ARGENTINA ........................................................................................................................ 11 1. Définition juridique ................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Harcèlement sexuel ........................................................................................ 11 1.2. Harcèlement de rue ........................................................................................ 11 2. Sanctions pénales du harcèlement de rue ................................................................................ 12 3. Sanctions civiles du harcèlement de rue ................................................................................... 12 4. Sanctions administratives du harcèlement de rue .................................................................... 12 5. Mise en œuvre des normes relatives au harcèlement de rue .................................................. 12 B. AUSTRIA ............................................................................................................................. 13 1. Definition ................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. (Sexuelle) Belästigung ..................................................................................... 13 1.2. Street Harassment (harcèlement de rue) ....................................................... 14 2. Sanktionen im Strafrecht ........................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Gesetzliche Neuerung, Absatz 1 a .................................................................. 15 2.2 Gesetzliche Neuerung, Absätze 2a, b (Straftaten aus Gruppen) .................... 17 3. Sanktionen im Zivilrecht ............................................................................................................ 19 4. Sanktionen im Verwaltungsrecht .............................................................................................. 19 5. Durchsetzung der Vorschriften ................................................................................................. 21 C. BELGIUM ............................................................................................................................ 23 1. What is the Legal Definition of .................................................................................................. 23 1.1. (sexual) Harassment? ...................................................................................... 23 1.2. Street Harassment (harcèlement de rue) ....................................................... 23 2. What, if any, are the Criminal Sanctions for Street Harassment? ............................................ 24 3. What, if any, are the Civil Sanctions for Street Harassment? ................................................... 24 4. What, if any, are the Administrative Sanctions for Street Harassment? .................................. 24 5. Is there Enforcement of Violations of Rules on Street Harassment? ........................................ 25 D. FRANCE .............................................................................................................................. 26 1. Définition juridique ................................................................................................................... 26 1.1. Harcèlement sexuel ........................................................................................ 26 1.2. Harcèlement de rue ........................................................................................ 27 2. Sanctions pénales du harcèlement de rue ................................................................................ 28 3. Sanctions civiles du harcèlement de rue ................................................................................... 29 4. Sanctions administratives du harcèlement de rue .................................................................... 29 5. Mise en œuvre des normes relatives au harcèlement de rue .................................................. 30 E. DEUTSCHLAND .................................................................................................................... 31 1. Definition ................................................................................................................................... 31 1.1 (Sexuelle) Belästigung ..................................................................................... 31 1.2. Sexuelle Belästigung auf der Strasse (harcèlement de rue) ........................... 32 2. Sanktionen im Strafrecht ........................................................................................................... 32 2.1. Sexuelle Belästigung (§ 184i Strafgesetzbuch) ............................................... 33 2.2. Straftaten aus Gruppen (§ 184j Strafgesetzbuch) .......................................... 34 2.3. Grob anstössige und belästigende Handlungen ............................................ 37 3. Sanktionen im Zivilrecht ............................................................................................................ 38 4. Sanktionen im Verwaltungsrecht .............................................................................................. 39 3 5. Durchsetzung der Vorschriften ................................................................................................. 41 F. ITALY .................................................................................................................................. 42 1. What is the Legal Definition of (sexual) Harassment? .............................................................. 42 2. What, if any, are the Criminal Sanctions for Street Harassment? ............................................ 42 3. What, if any, are the Civil Sanctions for Street Harassment? ................................................... 43 4. What, if any, are the Administrative Sanctions for Street Harassment? .................................. 44 5. Is there Enforcement of Violations of Rules on Street Harassment? ........................................ 44 G. THE NETHERLANDS ............................................................................................................. 47 1. What is the Legal Definition of: ................................................................................................. 47 1.1. (Sexual) Harassment? ..................................................................................... 47 1.2. Street Harassment (harcèlement de rue) ....................................................... 47 2. What, if any, are the Criminal Sanctions for Street Harassment? ............................................ 48 3. What, if any, are the Civil Sanctions for Street Harassment? ................................................... 49 4. What, if any, are the Administrative Sanctions for Street Harassment? .................................. 49 5. Is there Enforcement of Violations of Rules on Street Harassment? ........................................ 49 H. PERU .................................................................................................................................. 50 1. Définition juridique ................................................................................................................... 50 1.1. Harcèlement sexuel ........................................................................................ 50 1.2. Harcèlement de rue ........................................................................................ 50 2. Sanctions pénales du harcèlement de rue ................................................................................ 51 3. Sanctions civiles du harcèlement de rue ................................................................................... 51 4. Sanctions administratives du harcèlement de rue .................................................................... 51 5. Mise en œuvre des normes relatives au harcèlement de rue .................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Duits Engels Frans S
    Hieronder staan diverse juridische uitdrukkingen. Daarachter staan de vertalingen, respectievelijk in het: Duits Engels Frans Spaans Aangifte doen Anzeige erstatten lay en information Porter / déposer plainte denunciar (un delito) Aangifte (valse) falsche Anzeige (lay an) false charge fausse déclaration denuncia falsa Aangrijpen, vatten, pakken stellen, fassen, ergreifen to apprehend Appréhender aprehender Aanhangig maken anhängig machen Institutie proceedings porter (une action) devant entablar (un proceso) Aanhouden van zaak Aussetzen stay the proceedings suspendré Ie procés suspender Aanhouden van verdachte vorläufig festnehmen Arrest arréter provisoirement detener Aanhouden van vonnis Aussetzen defer judgment surseoir á statuer aplazar (la sentencia) Aanhouding van verdachte vorläufige Festnahme Arrest arrestation (provisoire) detencion Aanhouding van zaak Aussetzung stay of proceedings suspension du procés suspension Aanhouding van vonnis Ausselzung deferment of judgment sursis á statuer aplazamiento Aanhouding voorlopige vorläufige Festnahme provisional arrest arrestation provisoire detención preventiva Aanhoudingsbevel Haftbefehl warrant for the arrest of mandat d'arret orden de detención Aanklacht Anklage; Anschuldigung, Be- charge; indictment; arraignment dénonciation; plainte; accusation querella; acusación Zichtiging Aanklacht lasterlijk verleumderische Anklacht defamatory accusation dénunciation calomnieuse queralla calumniosa Aanmaning van getuige Zeugenbelehrung urge (a witness to speak the enjoindre te témoin de dire la
    [Show full text]
  • THE NORMALIZATION of PROSTITUTION in SWITZERLAND: the ORIGIN of POLICIES Corinne Isler University of Helsinki Marjut Jyrkinen University of Helsinki
    Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence Volume 3 | Issue 2 Article 4 April 2018 The orN malization of Prostitution in Switzerland: The Origin of Policies Corinne Isler University of Helsinki, [email protected] Marjut Jyrkinen University of Helsinki, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, European Law Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Political Economy Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Public Policy Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Recommended Citation Isler, Corinne and Jyrkinen, Marjut (2018) "The orN malization of Prostitution in Switzerland: The Origin of Policies," Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence: Vol. 3: Iss. 2, Article 4. DOI: 10.23860/dignity.2018.03.02.04 Available at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/vol3/iss2/4https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/vol3/iss2/4 This Research and Scholarly Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The orN malization of Prostitution in Switzerland: The Origin of Policies Abstract In this article, we examine how socio-political actors frame prostitution and problems attached to the phenomenon and what types of policies they suggest.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilburg University Quid Pro Quo? a Comparative Law Perspective on The
    Tilburg University Quid Pro Quo? A comparative law perspective on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Ouwerkerk, J.W. Publication date: 2011 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2011). Quid Pro Quo? A comparative law perspective on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters. Intersentia. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 05. okt. 2021 QUID PRO QUO? A COMPARATIVE LAW PERSPECTIVE ON THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS Jannemieke Ouwerkerk Cambridge – Antwerp – Portland Distribution for the UK: Distribution for the USA and Canada: Hart Publishing Ltd. International
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Assessment of Copyright Enforcement: a Comparative Study of the Music Industry in the P.R.C
    Empirical Assessment of Copyright Enforcement: A Comparative Study of the Music Industry in the P.R.C. and the R.O.C. By Gi-Kuen Li A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Juridical Science in the Graduate Division Of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Robert P. Merges, Chair Professor Peter S. Menell Professor Brian D. Wright Spring 2016 Empirical Assessment of Copyright Enforcement: A Comparative Study of the Music Industry in the P.R.C. and the R.O.C. Copyright © 2016 by Gi-Kuen Jacob Li Abstract Abstract Empirical Assessment of Copyright Enforcement: A Comparative Study of the Music Industry in the P.R.C. and the R.O.C. by Gi-Kuen Jacob Li Doctor of Juridical Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Robert P. Merges, Chair Since 2000, the revenue of the music industry plummeted worldwide. Meanwhile, the advancement of technology created many changes that impacted the copyright law system, which raised doubts about the effectiveness and necessity of copyright law system. Many literatures related to this topic focused on the discussion about the North America and the Europe regions. In the past two decades, researchers started to explore the intellectual property right protection in the P.R.C.; however, few works emphasized the comparative perspective between the copyright protection in the P.R.C. and the R.O.C. This dissertation argues that copyright law is still important to encourage and reward creativity. Under the utilitarian rationale, copyright law should be able to maintain incentive for authors and creators.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Prosecutorial Accountability, Independence and Effectiveness
    This book represents a comparative research of the prosecution institution in nine diff erent OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE countries. The main objective of the compara- SOFIA tive analysis is to identify the international stan- dards and best practices in terms of account- Solunska str. 56 ability, eff ectiveness and independence of the Sofia 1000 prosecution services. The study should guide Tel.: (+359 2) 930 66 19 and enrich national debates in countries where PROMOTINGPROMOTING Fax: (+359 2) 951 63 48 the prosecution needs to be reformed. In the last twenty years there have been sig- PROSECUTORIALPROSECUTORIAL www.osi.bg nifi cant changes in criminal procedure and in public prosecution in many parts of the world. ACCOUNTABILITY,ACCOUNTABILITY, The reports included in the volume aim, in part, to examine some important instances and ex- INDEPENDENCEINDEPENDENCE ANDAND amples of that trend. The country reports repre- sent a broad range of practices and approaches EFFECTIVENESSEFFECTIVENESS about the manner of organization of the pros- ecution service. The focus of the research is on Comparative Research the lessons learned from the reform in demo- cratic states and the challenges for the coun- tries in transition in designing the prosecution institution. The comparative research shows that there is JUSTICE not a universal model of prosecutorial indepen- dence and accountability. Hence, the reformers and decision makers have on their disposition a large variety of approaches to choose from on the occasion of a concrete reform. However, they should have in mind an important fi nd- JUSTICE ing of the comparative analysis, namely—im- porting an apparently successful element of a reform should not necessarily produce the ex- PROMOTING PROSECUTORIAL ACCOUNTABILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY, PROSECUTORIAL PROMOTING INDEPENDENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS pected positive results.
    [Show full text]