Technical Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technical Report Technology Analysis Report Cloud Storage Gateways Kiran Srinivasan, ATG, CTO Office Shwetha Krishnan, ATG, CTO Office Monika Doshi, SPT, CTO Office Chris Busick, V-series product group Sonali Sahu, V-series product group Kaladhar Voruganti, ATG, CTO Office TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Style examples (HEADING LEVEL 1, Arial bold 13 pt blue) Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1 subsection (heading level 2, arial bold 11 pt black) Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2 subsection (heading level 2) Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3 subsection (heading level 2) Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.4 subsection (heading level 2) Error! Bookmark not defined. 2 Template use Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.1 Applying paragraph styles Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.2 Adding Graphics Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3 Adding New Tables Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.4 styling Unformatted Tables Error! Bookmark not defined. 3 Appendices Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.1 Appendix title Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2 Appendix title Error! Bookmark not defined. 4 References Error! Bookmark not defined. 5 Styles lists Error! Bookmark not defined. LIST OF TABLES Table 1) Example NetApp table with caption. ............................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 2) Single-use styles............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 3) Authoring styles. ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1) Insert name of figure here (Arial bold 9 point gray). ...................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Figure 2) Example caption. Always finish captions with a period, even if it‟s not a complete sentence. ...................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Cloud Storage Gateways NetApp Confidential 1 SUMMARY In this section, we will present the key observations and insights of the report, these will be elaborated at length in the rest of the report. 1.1 CLOUD GATEWAYS (Section 2) A cloud storage gateway can be defined as follows: Cloud storage gateway is a hardware or software based appliance located on your organization’s premises. It enables applications located in your local datacenter to access data over a WAN from external cloud storage. The applications continue to use iSCSI, CIFS, NFS protocols while the cloud storage gateway accesses data over the WAN using APIs such as SOAP or REST. Cloud gateways act as a bridge between enterprise data centers and storage that is resident in an external service provider, supporting the trend towards hybrid clouds. Why are gateways important for our customers? 1. Agile storage delivery a. Provide access to a elastic storage for enterprises with simpler and rapid provisioning 2. Lower infrastructure costs : a. Pay only for storage used (pay-as-you-go model). b. Lower capital costs in the data center. c. Reduced storage management, offloaded to the cloud provider. d. No separate off-site disaster recovery solution needed. Why are gateways important for NetApp? 1. Another storage tier offering with different SLA properties in our storage portfolio. a. Cloud storage is viewed as low-SLA storage. A cloud gateway can enhance the value of cloud storage for enterprises – features like security, dedupe, storage mgmt., etc. 2. Opportunity to offer MSEs a compelling alternative to dedicated backup appliances (e.g. Data Domain). 1.2 RATIONALE FOR CLOUD GATEWAYS (section 2.3 ) Enterprise backups, archival data and tape data can leverage elastic cloud storage: o Roughly three copies of primary data are created for backup and secondary purposes leading to provisioning issues. o Cloud storage in a remote data center can be an equivalent for off-site tape (for DR). o Storage in the cloud is the largest growing cloud service (750 Billion objects in S3 by late 2011). Mainly archival and online backups from consumer space. o Movement of enterprise data can be facilitated by the advent of cloud gateways. All enterprise applications might not move to the cloud: o Migration of compute and storage to the cloud is not cheap unless the application is offered as a SaaS (Software as a Service) (e.g. Salesforce.com, Microsoft‟s Office365). o Security, control and process concerns for many larger enterprises will force them to keep at least some applications on-premises. o On-premise enterprise applications can benefit from elasticity and other cloud storage advantages via cloud gateways. Cloud Storage Gateways NetApp Confidential 1.3 KEY CLOUD GATEWAY USE CASES (Sections 3, 4, 5) Short term (1-2 yrs): Conduit for secondary storage - backup streams, archival data and tape data. Longer term (2-5 yrs): Conduit for primary Tier-2 application data (primary) – Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SharePoint, Home directories. 1.4 OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS FOR NETAPP (Section 7) Threat: Tier-2 application primary data, especially in virtualized environments form the bulk of our revenue. They can move to the cloud via cloud gateways impacting our revenue significantly. Amazon‟s AWS gateway suggests that their next version will aim at primary enterprise data. Opportunity-1: Currently NetApp does not have a compelling solution against DataDomain‟s backup appliances. A cloud gateway solution with inline deduplication, WAN latency performance optimizations, integrated with NetApp data management features (like SnapVault, Sync Mirror) allows us to compete with them in this $2.18B market. Opportunity-2: Cloud gateways can enable easier migration of data to cloud service providers who use NetApp storage. In addition, an integrated solution between a NetApp-based cloud storage and NetApp cloud gateway can be efficient and compelling. 1.5 KEY COMPETITORS IN THIS SPACE (Section 6) Startup vendors: Nasuni (primary focus), StorSimple (Sharepoint integration), Panzura (Global file system), CTERA (consumer oriented). Enterprise readiness is a question with most of them, only a couple of them have more than 50 customers. Established vendors: Amazon AWS Gateway, Riverbed‟s Whitewater appliance, Microsoft Azure appliance. Amazon‟s gateway as well as Google‟s foray into cloud storage highlight the fact that established players are keen to move entreprise data to the cloud. EMC has partnerships with almost all gateway vendors. EMC also has Atmos for cloud storage. Mode of deployment: All have VSAs, some have both VSAs and physical appliances. Very few have HA capabilities. 1.6 NETAPP ADVANTAGES/DISTINGUISHING FEATURES (Section 8) NetApp’s data management value: Expose NetApp‟s value add in data management (like snapshots, cloning, mirroring, snapvault) on another storage tier - cloud storage. SLO-based management: Enable migration of data between traditional storage tiers and cloud storage via SLOs. Leverage NetApp technologies: Cloud gateways require write-back caching for performance, NetApp can leverage existing technologies to create an efficient write-back cache that is protected by HA. 1.7 KEY ADDITIONAL IP FOR A CLOUD GATEWAY VIS-À-VIS NETAPP (SECTION 9) Basic cloud gateway infrastructure (for both secondary and primary storage): o File to object protocols conversion. o Volume to objects/group of objects data granularity mapping. o Security of objects in the cloud (encryption). Cloud Storage Gateways NetApp Confidential Value-added features (for both secondary and primary storage): o Compression o Deduplication o Application integration. o Cloud-aware data management (like auditing cloud costs) Optimizations for a viable primary specific storage solution: o WAN latency optimization via read and write back caching, pre-fetching Infrastructure for global collaboration of a primary storage repository: o Global Locking across a WAN. 1.8 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NETAPP (Section 9, Section 10) BUY : (Near Term – 1 yr) o Pros: Lower time to market; compelling and unique IP (as listed above in Section 1.7). o Cons: Enterprise readiness of many startup vendors; Integration of acquired vendor‟s IP with NetApp data management features requires time and effort. o Recommendation: Buy only when IP is hard to develop; chart out pathway to integrate. PARTNER : (Short Term – 3 to 6 months) o Pros: Lower time to market; parity with EMC; integrated solutions that lower TCO. o Cons: Limited gains; NetApp‟s data management value-add could be hidden BUILD : (Long Term – 2 yrs) o Pros: NetApp‟s distinguishing features can be fully leveraged; enterprise readiness o Cons: Building cloud gateway in ONTAP would take beyond 2015 (LB+). Building non- ONTAP solution might limit exposing our value-adds. The overall recommendation is to partner immediately with cloud gateway vendors and pursue the „buy‟ and „build‟ options in parallel. Specific projects in the „build‟ option are outlined below: Enhance our V-series offering to have a cloud storage backend (already underway) ATG Projects: o Understand the performance of primary, Tier-2 applications on a cloud gateway o Reliability and security aspects of cloud gateway o Unique data management functionality required for cloud gateways o Global file system using cloud gateways Cloud Storage Gateways NetApp Confidential 2 INTRODUCTION The growth of cloud technologies, both public and private clouds, have been driven primarily by perceived reduction in IT costs. The commoditization of server hardware resources (especially CPU cycles, memory capacity and disk capacity) has been the
Recommended publications
  • Certified Ubuntu on Joyent Cloud
    Certied Ubuntu on Joyent Cloud Ubuntu is the most popular Linux OS in the cloud. Every Joyent and Canonical share a focus and passion for open day, users choose Ubuntu for its performance, reliability and source technology. Joyent has been supporting key open robust ecosystem of tools and applications. As Joyent source projects such as SmartOS and Node.js for years and customers deploy their mission-critical and essential Canonical is the company driving the evolution and support of applications to the Joyent Cloud the importance of having a Ubuntu. By combining the uniquely powerful Joyent Cloud certied version of Ubuntu that is consistent and fully service with the best of breed Linux as a certied option backed by Canonical in their data center, private cloud or Joyent customers can enjoy the best possible user public cloud is essential. Joyent customers get the experience available in cloud. assurance that the Ubuntu they trust to run their business is highly optimized,fully secure and eligible for support and Accelerate your applications today! upgrade services from Canonical. à www.joyent.com à www.ubuntu.com/cloud/ecosystem Certied Ubuntu Value Enhancements for Joyent Users Ubuntu Cloud images, tuned and tested for the Joyent environment Stock Kernel • All kernel patches, drivers, tools and packages By using Stock Kernel for each release we have gained a faster boot • Timely image updates including critical bug xes and security time, increased overall performance, and a wider application usage updates such as supporting Docker out of the box. • Eligible for support from Canonical through Ubuntu Advantage Cloud-Init Cloud Image Quality Assurance Cloud-Init is the multi CSP system that handles early initialization of a • Joyent specic testing atop the Ubuntu Server testing cloud instance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cloud‐Based Demand‐Driven Supply Chain
    The Cloud-Based Demand-Driven Supply Chain Wiley & SAS Business Series The Wiley & SAS Business Series presents books that help senior-level managers with their critical management decisions. Titles in the Wiley & SAS Business Series include: The Analytic Hospitality Executive by Kelly A. McGuire Analytics: The Agile Way by Phil Simon Analytics in a Big Data World: The Essential Guide to Data Science and Its Applications by Bart Baesens A Practical Guide to Analytics for Governments: Using Big Data for Good by Marie Lowman Bank Fraud: Using Technology to Combat Losses by Revathi Subramanian Big Data Analytics: Turning Big Data into Big Money by Frank Ohlhorst Big Data, Big Innovation: Enabling Competitive Differentiation through Business Analytics by Evan Stubbs Business Analytics for Customer Intelligence by Gert Laursen Business Intelligence Applied: Implementing an Effective Information and Communications Technology Infrastructure by Michael Gendron Business Intelligence and the Cloud: Strategic Implementation Guide by Michael S. Gendron Business Transformation: A Roadmap for Maximizing Organizational Insights by Aiman Zeid Connecting Organizational Silos: Taking Knowledge Flow Management to the Next Level with Social Media by Frank Leistner Data-Driven Healthcare: How Analytics and BI Are Transforming the Industry by Laura Madsen Delivering Business Analytics: Practical Guidelines for Best Practice by Evan Stubbs ii Demand-Driven Forecasting: A Structured Approach to Forecasting, Second Edition by Charles Chase Demand-Driven Inventory
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Cloud-Enabled File Storage Infrastructure
    F5 White Paper Building a Cloud-Enabled File Storage Infrastructure A cloud-enabled infrastructure can help your organization seamlessly integrate cloud storage and maximize cost savings, while also offering significant benefits to your traditional file storage environments. by Renny Shen Product Marketing Manager White Paper Building a Cloud-Enabled File Storage Infrastructure Contents Introduction 3 What Makes a Cloud? 3 Types of Cloud Storage 4 What Makes Cloud Storage Different? 4 Accessing Files Remotely over the Network 5 Accessing Files on Object-Based Storage 5 Unique Cost Structure 6 Where Clouds Make Sense 7 Fitting the Cloud into a Tiered Storage Framework 7 Expanding the Parameters for Tiering with the Cloud 8 Defining Cloud-Enabled 9 Integrating Different Types of Storage 10 Non-Disruptive File Migration 11 Automated Storage Tiering 11 Benefits of a Cloud-Enabled Infrastructure 12 Reduced Storage Costs 12 Reduced Backup Times and Costs 13 Reduced Operational Costs 13 The F5 Cloud Storage Model 13 Creating a Private Cloud 15 Conclusion 18 2 White Paper Building a Cloud-Enabled File Storage Infrastructure Introduction Cloud storage offers enterprise organizations the opportunity to bring constantly rising file storage costs and management burden under control. By moving appropriate types of files to the cloud, organizations can reduce not only the amount of storage capacity that they need to purchase, but also the operational overhead involved in managing it. In addition, the cloud enables storage capacity to be increased on demand, while charging organizations only for the amount of storage that is actually utilized. Cloud storage will bring many changes to the way enterprises manage storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Computing: a Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-Level Offerings David Hilley College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology
    Cloud Computing: A Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-level Offerings David Hilley College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology April 2009 Cloud Computing: A Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-level Offerings David Hilley 1 Introduction Cloud computing is a buzzword and umbrella term applied to several nascent trends in the turbulent landscape of information technology. Computing in the “cloud” alludes to ubiquitous and inexhaustible on-demand IT resources accessible through the Internet. Practically every new Internet-based service from Gmail [1] to Amazon Web Services [2] to Microsoft Online Services [3] to even Facebook [4] have been labeled “cloud” offerings, either officially or externally. Although cloud computing has garnered significant interest, factors such as unclear terminology, non-existent product “paper launches”, and opportunistic marketing have led to a significant lack of clarity surrounding discussions of cloud computing technology and products. The need for clarity is well-recognized within the industry [5] and by industry observers [6]. Perhaps more importantly, due to the relative infancy of the industry, currently-available product offerings are not standardized. Neither providers nor potential consumers really know what a “good” cloud computing product offering should look like and what classes of products are appropriate. Consequently, products are not easily comparable. The scope of various product offerings differ and overlap in complicated ways – for example, Ama- zon’s EC2 service [7] and Google’s App Engine [8] partially overlap in scope and applicability. EC2 is more flexible but also lower-level, while App Engine subsumes some functionality in Amazon Web Services suite of offerings [2] external to EC2.
    [Show full text]
  • Walmart & Azure
    Microsoft Azure: The Ultimate Flexible Enterprise-Level Solution Janet Bailey, PhD Bradley Jensen, PhD University of Arkansas at Little Rock Microsoft Corporation Background Project Assignment Evaluate the Value and Fit of Azure for Walmart Initiator Steven Lamey, Senior Business Manager, Walmart Corporation UALR Student Team 4 Graduates / 2 Undergraduates Time Frame 8 months (4 months research & development) Faculty Mentor Industry Support Janet Bailey, PhD Bradley Jensen, PhD UALR Student Team with Walmart and Microsoft Executives Corporate World’s largest Headquarters corporation Bentonville, AR 1962 $421.849 billion annual sales 2010 Brazil In 15 countries Asia >8,500 stores worldwide > 2.1 million associates worldwide India Walmart employs 1% of America US stores visited by 100 million customers every week In other words, 1/3 of America goes to Walmart every week!! > 1million customer transactions every hour databases estimated > 2.5 petabytes—the equivalent of 167 times the books in America’s Library of Congress So why did Walmart start considering Cloud Computing 2011? Dangerous to not #1 strategic have a cloud strategy technology initiative Gartner Initially, Walmart thought they needed a cloud provider that could/would… Meet Walmart’s massive processing/storage capacity requirements Provide a flexible application development environment Provide information on the cloud architecture Allow for secure access to data outside of the corporate firewall We found they also required… Fast and easy scalability An environment that supports
    [Show full text]
  • Joyent Smart Architecture for Cloud Computing RC1
    The Joyent Smart Technologies Architecture for Cloud Computing A Joyent White Paper Executive Summary The term cloud computing encompasses many different types of services. Therefore, evaluating business needs carefully before choosing a cloud vendor is imperative. Software-, platform-, and infrastructure-as- service vendors differ not only in the type of products they offer but also in the type of architecture their cloud incorporates. This paper examines the broad architectural differences in cloud computing products, the drawbacks to more generic approaches in cloud delivery, and the Joyent philosophy of constructing cloud computing infrastructures. The paper then describes the Joyent Smart Technologies cloud architecture from server and operating system through data center and software development platform. 1 Contents Introduction!3 Not All Clouds Deliver the Same Service (….nor should they)!3 Software as a Service!3 Platform as a Service!4 Infrastructure as a Service!5 Limitations of Common Cloud Infrastructures!5 Public, Private, and Hybrid Clouds!7 The Joyent Cloud Philosophy!8 Joyent Smart Technologies Architecture Overview!9 SmartMachine!10 SmartDataCenter!13 SmartPlatform!15 Joyent Cloud Products at Work!17 Joyent Application Hosting!17 Joyent PaaS!17 Joyent IaaS!17 Conclusion!18 References!19 2 Introduction In the past three years, the term cloud computing has become increasingly elastic. Developers, industry analysts, and customers have all stretched and morphed the definition of the term to encompass a broad range of technologies and products. While an expanding market offers businesses more choice, it also complicates the rational analysis of the underlying technologies. For this reason, companies evaluating potential cloud computing infrastructures should take a pragmatic, business-minded approach in evaluating competing cloud computing infrastructures.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Computing Parallel Session Cloud Computing
    Cloud Computing Parallel Session Jean-Pierre Laisné Open Source Strategy Bull OW2 Open Source Cloudware Initiative Cloud computing -Which context? -Which road map? -Is it so cloudy? -Openness vs. freedom? -Opportunity for Europe? Cloud in formation Source: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Clouds_edited.jpg ©Bull, 2 ITEA2 - Artemis: Cloud Computing 2010 1 Context 1: Software commoditization Common Specifications Not process specific •Marginal product •Economies of scope differentiation Offshore •Input in many different •Recognized quality end-products or usage standards •Added value is created •Substituable goods downstream Open source •Minimize addition to end-user cost Mature products Volume trading •Marginal innovation Cloud •Economies of scale •Well known production computing •Industry-wide price process levelling •Multiple alternative •Additional margins providers through additional volume Commoditized IT & Internet-based IT usage ©Bull, 3 ITEA2 - Artemis: Cloud Computing 2010 Context 2: The Internet is evolving ©Bull, 4 ITEA2 - Artemis: Cloud Computing 2010 2 New trends, new usages, new business -Apps vs. web pages - Specialized apps vs. HTML5 - Segmentation vs. Uniformity -User “friendly” - Pay for convenience -New devices - Phones, TV, appliances, etc. - Global economic benefits of the Internet - 2010: $1.5 Trillion - 2020: $3.8 Trillion Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) Long live the Internet ©Bull, 5 ITEA2 - Artemis: Cloud Computing 2010 Context 3: Cloud on peak of inflated expectations According to
    [Show full text]
  • 1 an Explanatory Case Study on Cloud Computing Applications In
    An Explanatory Case Study on Cloud Computing Applications in the Built Environment Heap-Yih Chong1, 2*, John Son Wong1 and Xiangyu Wang2, 3 1Faculty of Engineering & Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia. 2Australasian Joint Research Centre for Building Information Modelling (BIM), School of Built Environment, Curtin University, Australia. 3 Department of Housing and Interior Design, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. Abstract Fragmentation of practices is one of the key issues in the built environment. However, with advances in Information and Communication Technology (ICT), particularly cloud computing, the fragmentation of working practices can be potentially overcome. The technology could enhance communication and information flow in various stages along a project life cycle. Due to the increasing demands and the newly developed cloud computing applications, it is critical to review and identify the appropriate cloud computing applications in the built environment. A total of forty two cloud computing applications consisting of general cloud applications, Building Information Modelling (BIM), and project management cloud applications were selected and critically reviewed. A decision-making model was also developed to assist parties in selecting a suitable application. The explanatory case study has discovered numerous possible cloud computing applications in various disciplines, for example, Google Apps, Autodesk BIM 360, and Viewpoint are the applications with the most features. The findings contribute to creating a certain awareness and insight to reduce the fragmented working practices in the built environment. * Corresponding author. E-mail address: heapyih.chong@curtin .edu.au or [email protected] (H.Y. Chong). 1 Keywords: Cloud computing; BIM; project management; critical review; information management 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud CRM's Evolution and Impact on QA
    • Cognizant 20-20 Insights Cloud CRM’s Evolution and Impact on QA As cloud-based customer relationship management systems such as Salesforce.com go mainstream, quality assurance and testing teams need to reinvent their skills and processes to ensure timely and effective application deployment and return on investment. Executive Summary The Cloud: A Brief History Cloud computing is not a completely new technol- The cloud revolution1 started with the software as a ogy; rather, it represents a change in the software service (SaaS) model. In this approach, the vendor ecology for solution creation, distribution and provides end users a full software suite that is consumption. Cloud architecture has already had hosted on the vendor’s premises. These end users disruptive effects on the techno-business land- typically do not need any additional hardware or scape, particularly in pushing established vendors infrastructure, except network connectivity and aside as new players emerge. The cloud’s most an Internet browser to run the applications. Web- critical change is the amount of power and flex- based e-mail services such as Hotmail are among ibility provided to application designers, content the earliest examples of SaaS. However, the full creators and end users. The traditional roles of potential of the model was realized only after developers, testers and end users in the software multi-tenant architectures came into existence. development lifecycle (SDLC) model have become interchangeable in some respects; all roles must In the multi-tenant model, each client (usually, an adapt to survive, if not thrive, in this new age. enterprise) shares computing resources provid- ed by a host service provider, but has separate This white paper discusses enhanced testing tech- and distinct data and code bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Acronis Backup 12.5
    Acronis Backup 12.5 BEST PRACTICES Revision: 12/12/2019 Table of contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................5 2 Acronis Backup components and architecture ..................................................................5 2.1 Resource usage calculator ......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Licensing .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Policy ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2.2 License Server ................................................................................................................................................ 10 2.2.3 Using Standard and Advanced on one Management Server ..................................................................... 10 3 Single and isolated machines.......................................................................................... 11 3.1 Preparing for deployment .......................................................................................................11 3.1.1 Software requirements for single and isolated machines ......................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Hardware requirements and sizing .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AWS Storage Gateway Fred Hutch - Partly Cloudy Conference
    AWS Storage Gateway Fred Hutch - Partly Cloudy Conference Jeff Bartley | Storage Solutions Architect | [email protected] October 25th, 2018 © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Enabling a spectrum of hybrid use cases Analytics | File Services | Production Tiering | Data Processing Data Distribution | Backup | DR | Archive | Migration Amazon Amazon Amazon Amazon Amazon Amazon AWS Amazon EMR Athena S3 Glacier EBS EC2 Lambda CloudFront AWS Storage Gateway Enterprise Data Centers Remote Offices Research Sites Small-Medium Businesses Multimedia content File servers Databases App. servers Devices Users Backup servers © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. AWS Storage Gateway Family Hybrid storage service enabling applications to seamlessly use AWS storage File Gateway Store and access objects in Amazon S3 from file-based applications with local caching Volume Gateway Block storage on-premises backed by cloud storage with local caching, EBS snapshots, and clones Tape Gateway Drop-in replacement for physical tape infrastructure backed by cloud storage with local caching © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. AWS Storage Gateway Family Files Amazon S3 (NFS or SMB) AWS Storage Gateway Amazon EBS Volumes snapshots (iSCSI) HTTPS Gateway Service Amazon Glacier Tapes AWS Identity and Access (iSCSI VTL) AWS CloudTrail Management (IAM) Amazon AWS Key Management Service Customer Premises CloudWatch (AWS KMS) Gateway provides applications Native storage in AWS • Protocol conversion and device emulation • Objects in S3 (file) • Caching (read-through / write-back) • Snapshots in EBS (volume) • Optimized data transfer • Archives in Glacier (tape) © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Cloud Storage Products
    Build aHybridStorageCloud services and possible pitfalls. This guide can help you make thosedecisions. services make pitfalls.Thisguidecanhelpyou andpossible products, ontheavailable choicesandeducate themselves tomake require users data bothofthesemethodsstoring ofusingthecloudforstorage; common way couldbecomethemost Combining publiccloudservices andon-premisesstorage VIRTUALIZATION CLOUD APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT NETWORKING STORAGE ARCHITECTURE DATA CENTER MANAGEMENT BUSINEss INTELLIGENCE/APPLICATIONS DISASTER RECOVERY/COMPLIANCE SECURITY S MOD HYBRID CLOUD 4 PROS A HYBRID CLOUD 3 S HYBRID CLOUD 2 NoT EDITor’s 1 Guide An Essential TILL HASW TORAG N E D CO PRODU E N E AK S SP C TS OTS E L EDITor’S NOTE 1 Building the Bridge: Making Hybrid Clouds a Reality IT managers who want to take advantage of com- awareness and bandwidth issues are among the items Home petitive cloud pricing, and the promise of elasticity that will factor into the decision process. While pub- that comes with public clouds, will almost always be- lic cloud storage brings the potential for big savings, it Editor’s Note gin their journey to the cloud with a hybrid model. A also presents latency problems; private cloud storage hybrid cloud model is not only the most likely start- is limited to private data centers and it requires the IT Hybrid Cloud ing point for an organization, but it is also often the manager to guarantee scalability at a time when unprec- Storage Products framework they decide on as a lasting strategy. That’s edented volumes of unstructured data are produced. because it allows a combination of on-site cloud storage this Essential Guide to building a hybrid storage cloud Hybrid Cloud Pros and Cons and public cloud storage to accommodate varying needs offers sophisticated analysis, discusses hybrid cloud throughout an organization for data access and speed of storage models for various needs, and answers key Hybrid Cloud Model delivery.
    [Show full text]