Notice Classification of Wild Trout Streams Proposed Additions, Revisions, and Removals September 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025. -
Assessing Wetland Condition on a Watershed Basis in the Mid-Atlantic Region Using Synoptic Land-Cover Maps
ASSESSING WETLAND CONDITION ON A WATERSHED BASIS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION USING SYNOPTIC LAND-COVER MAPS ROBERT P. BROOKS*, DENICE H. WARDROP, and JOSEPH A. BISHOP Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center, 302 Walker Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA (*author for correspondence, phone: 814-863-1596, fax: 814-863-7943, e-mail:[email protected]) Abstract. We developed a series of tools to address three integrated tasks needed to effectively manage wetlands on a watershed basis: inventory, assessment, and restoration. Depending on the objectives of an assessment, availability of resources, and degree of confidence required in the results, there are three levels of effort available to address these three tasks. This paper describes the development and use of synoptic land-cover maps (Level 1) to assess wetland condition for a watershed. The other two levels are a rapid assessment using ground reconnaissance (Level 2) and intensive field assessment (Level 3). To illustrate the application of this method, seven watersheds in Pennsylvania were investigated representing a range of areas (89–777 km2), land uses, and ecoregions found in the Mid-Atlantic Region. Level 1 disturbance scores were based on land cover in 1-km radius circles centered on randomly-selected wetlands in each watershed. On a standardized, 100-point, human-disturbance scale, with 100 being severely degraded and 1 being the most ecologically intact, the range of scores for the seven watersheds was a relatively pristine score of 4 to a moderately degraded score of 66. This entire process can be conducted in a geographic information system (GIS)-capable office with readily available data and without engaging in extensive field investigations. -
2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS
2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education. -
West Branch Subbasin AMD Remediation Strategy
Publication 254 West Branch Susquehanna Subbasin May 2008 AMD Remediation Strategy: West Branch Susquehanna Background, Data Assessment River Task Force and Method Development Despite the enormous legacy ■ INTRODUCTION Pristine setting along the West Branch Susquehanna River. of pollution from abandoned mine The West Branch Susquehanna drainage (AMD) in the West Subbasin, draining a 6,978-square-mile Branch Susquehanna Subbasin, area in northcentral Pennsylvania, is the there has been mounting support largest of the six major subbasins in and enthusiasm for a fully restored the Susquehanna River Basin (Figure 1). watershed. Under the leadership The West Branch Susquehanna of Governor Edward G. Rendell Subbasin is one of extreme contrasts. While and with support from it has some of the Commonwealth’s Trout Unlimited, Pennsylvania most pristine and treasured waterways, Department of Environmental including 1,249 miles of Exceptional Protection Secretary Kathleen Value streams and scenic forestlands and mountains, it also unfortunately M. Smith McGinty established the West bears the legacy of past Branch Susquehanna River Task unregulated mining. With Abandoned mine lands in Clearfield County. Force (Task Force) in 2004. 1,205 miles of waterways The goal of the Task Force is to impaired by AMD, it is the assist and advise the department and most AMD-impaired region its partners as they work toward of the entire Susquehanna the long-term goal to remediate the River Basin (Figure 2). At its most degraded region’s AMD. sites, the West Branch The Task Force is comprised Susquehanna River contains of state, federal, and regional acidity concentrations of agencies, Trout Unlimited, and nearly 200 milligrams per other conservation and watershed liter (mg/l), and iron and aluminum concentrations of organizations (members are identified A. -
Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802 -
Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96 -
Water Body Use Designation INDEX
Ohio Water Quality Standards Administrative Code Chapter 3745-1 Water Body Use Designation INDEX Sorted alphabetically by water body name Most Recent Revision: December 22, 2015 (Covers rules effective November 30, 2015) Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 FORWARD What is the purpose of this index? This document contains an alphabetical listing of the water bodies designated in rules 08 to 32 of Chapter 3745-1 of the Administrative Code (Ohio Water Quality Standards). Rules 08 to 30 designate beneficial uses for water bodies in the 23 major drainage basins in Ohio. Rule 31 designates beneficial uses for Lake Erie. Rule 32 designates beneficial uses for the Ohio River. This document is updated whenever those rules are changed. Use this index to find the location of a water body within rules 08 to 32. For each water body in this index, the water body into which it flows is listed along with the rule number and page number within that rule where you can find its designated uses. How can I use this index to find the use designations for a water body? For example, if you want to find the beneficial use designations for Allen Run, find Allen Run on page 1 of this index. You will see that there are three Allen Runs listed in rules 08 to 32. If the Allen Run you are looking for is a tributary of Little Olive Green Creek, go to page 6 of rule 24 to find its designated uses. -
White Deer PWS ID: 4490023 a Message from Pennsylvania American Water’S President
2020 Annual SYSTEM NAME White Deer PWS ID: 4490023 A message from Pennsylvania American Water’s President Dear Pennsylvania American Water Customer, Having access to safe, reliable water service is something that can be easily taken for granted. This report contains At Pennsylvania American Water, it’s our top priority. important information I am pleased to share with you our 2020 Consumer Confidence Report, which is a testament about your drinking to the hard work and dedication of our employees. As you read through this annual water water. Translate it or quality information, you will see that we continue to supply high quality drinking water service speak with someone to help keep your life flowing. who understands it at, We monitor and test your water at multiple points throughout our process of drawing it from its 1-800-565-7292 source, treating it to meet drinking water standards, and distributing it through our pipeline Monday-Friday, systems. In fact, we test for about 100 regulated contaminants as required by state and 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. federal drinking water standards. MIKE DORAN QUALITY: We take water quality so seriously that 33 of our surface water treatment plants President, Pennsylvania have been nationally recognized with Directors Awards from the U.S. Environmental Protection American Water Agency’s (EPA) Partnership for Safe Water program for surpassing federal and state drinking water standards, with 18 of these treatment plants having maintained this high level of . service for 20 years or more. We remain committed to protecting our sources of drinking water. -
Class a Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class
Class A Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class A Waters: Streams that support a population of naturally produced trout of sufficient size and abundance to support a long-term and rewarding sport fishery. Management: Natural reproduction, wild populations with no stocking. Definition of Ownership: Percent Public Ownership: the percent of stream section that is within publicly owned land is listed in this column, publicly owned land consists of state game lands, state forest, state parks, etc. Important Note to Anglers: Many waters in Pennsylvania are on private property, the listing or mapping of waters by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission DOES NOT guarantee public access. Always obtain permission to fish on private property. Percent Lower Limit Lower Limit Length Public County Water Section Fishery Section Limits Latitude Longitude (miles) Ownership Adams Carbaugh Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Carbaugh Reservoir pool 39.871810 -77.451700 1.50 100 Adams East Branch Antietam Creek 1 Brook Headwaters to Waynesboro Reservoir inlet 39.818420 -77.456300 2.40 100 Adams-Franklin Hayes Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 31 Bedford Bear Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 40.207730 -78.317500 0.77 100 Bedford Ott Town Run 1 Brown Headwaters to Mouth 39.978611 -78.440833 0.60 0 Bedford Potter Creek 2 Brown T 609 bridge to Mouth 40.189160 -78.375700 3.30 0 Bedford Three Springs Run 2 Brown Rt 869 bridge at New Enterprise to Mouth 40.171320 -78.377000 2.00 0 Bedford UNT To Shobers Run (RM 6.50) 2 Brown -
The Remarkable Widow Catherine Smith
The Remarkable Widow Catherine Smith Widow Catherine Smith settled at the mouth of White Deer Creek about 1773 on 300 acres of land claimed by her late husband Peter Smith. Catherine, mother of 10, was a small woman, about 5 feet tall, with short black hair and a pleasant expression. The Smith's, from Manheim Township, Lancaster County, operated a trading post (c. 1768 - 1773) at what is now Lock Haven. Sons Michael and Philip built a gristmill at McElhatton Run, Clinton County. Son William removed to the Ohio Territory. Settlers at White Deer asked Widow Smith to build a gristmill to process local grains, and a sawmill to cut local timber. The location at White Deer Creek, just off the Susquehanna, provided power for the mills and access to transportation. A boring mill was soon added. Boring mills made rifle barrels and re-bored barrels as they became worn from use. In the 1770's guns were scarce. Some settlers had muskets which were neither as accurate nor effective as rifles. Many in the militia had no guns at all. In order to forge a rifle barrel, a bar of iron was heated and hammered into a flat shape, the dimensions of which (length, width and thickness) were determined by the ultimate size of the rifle barrel. A rifle barrel could be up to 48" long. The flattened metal was shaped around a steel rod until the edges overlapped and could be welded together by heating successive small sections. Through repeated heatings and hammerings, it would in the end appear that the barrel was made from a solid piece of iron. -
1978 Act 167 Stormwater Management May 14, 2009
1978 Act 167 Stormwater Management May 14, 2009 PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES COVERED BY COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER GRANTS ERIE McKEAN SUSQUEHANNA WARREN BRADFORD TIOGA POTTER CRAWFORD WAYNE WYOMING FOREST CAMERON ELK SULLIVAN LACKAWANNA VENANGO LYCOMING PIKE MERCER CLINTON LUZERNE CLARION JEFFERSON MONROE COLUMBIA LAWRENCE MONTOUR CENTRE CLEARFIELD UNION BUTLER CARBON ARMSTRONG NORTHUMBERLAND NORTHAMPTON SNYDER SCHUYLKILL BEAVER INDIANA LEHIGH MIFFLIN JUNIATA ALLEGHENY CAMBRIA BLAIR BERKS PERRY DAUPHIN LEBANON BUCKS WESTMORELAND HUNTINGDON MONTGOMERY WASHINGTON CUMBERLAND BEDFORD PHILADELPHIA LANCASTER CHESTER SOMERSET FAYETTE FRANKLIN DELAWARE FULTON YORK GREENE ADAMS Legend COUNTYWIDE STATUS Not Ready 0 50 100 Being Considered Miles In Progress Action Needed Updated: 05/14/09 County Wide Status last c_name MunicsVioltrs p1 Grant p1 Grant p1 Grant p1 Scope p1 Scope p1 Scope p2 Grant p2 Grant p2 Grant p2 Plan p2 Plan p2 Plan Draft Signed Approved Draft Submitted Approved Draft Signed Approved Draft Submitted Approved Cisar Adams 34 0 3/15/2007 3/8/2007 5/8/2007 Bedford 38 10 4/3/2008 Blair 24 1 4/18/2007 Cameron 7 0 2/13/2008 Centre 35 7 4/7/2009 Clearfield 50 11 3/10/2008 3/25/2008 5/2/2008 5/9/2009 Clinton 29 4 Cumberland 33 7 5/30/2006 6/23/2006 8/29/2006 4/5/2007 4/5/2007 8/30/2007 7/27/2007 9/6/2007 11/5/2007 Dauphin 40 25 11/20/2006 1/22/2007 3/27/2007 1/22/2007 1/22/2007 1/22/2007 1/22/2007 2/6/2007 3/27/2007 Franklin 22 6 2/4/2009 Fulton 13 0 4/1/2008 4/1/2008 5/6/2008 11/3/2008 11/5/2008 1/2/2009 11/5/2008 11/14/2008 3/13/2009 Huntingdon -
Plan Appendix
Appendix APPENDIX - 99 100 - APPENDIX Prior Planning Efforts BVRT - Final Section Feasibility Study A considerable number of planning efforts specific to, or related to, green- This report was prepared by the Buffalo Valley Recreation Authority (BVRA) ways and open space have been completed within the last 10 years. the most with assistance from its consultant and Bucknell University. The three main relevant are highlighted here with a description of the significant aspects of objectives outlined include the following: each that most directly affect greenway and open space planning and devel- opment. 1. Connect the BVRT across US Route 15 and through the Borough of Lewisburg; Bucknell River Access Report 2. Establish a trail spur to Market Street in Lewisburg; and 3. Rehabilitate and reuse the historic railroad bridge across the This report was completed by five students of Bucknell University as part of a Susquehanna and link to the proposed Route 405 greenway in Geography course / Community Service project in the Spring of 2013 and was Northumberland County. presented to the Borough and the Lewisburg Neighborhoods Corporation th th (LNC). Item #2 above, along with an extension of the BVRT between 8 and 5 Streets, was constructed in 2015. The remaining objectives have not been The Bucknell River access report recommends the following actions to im- met. prove community connections and access to the Susquehanna River: Centre County Greenway Plan • Connect Riverwoods to the greater Lewisburg community with a trail or connecting sidewalks along River Road, including pedestrian access The Centre County Greenway Plan recommends a trail connection, using the across the St.