DOCSLIB.ORG

Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act Committee Report 7-18(3) May 29, 2018 18th Legislative Assembly of the Northwest Territories Standing Committee on Government Operations Standing Committee on Social Development Report on the Review of Bill 6: Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act Chairs: Mr. Kieron Testart Mr. Shane Thompson MEMBERS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS AND THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Kieron Testart Shane Thompson MLA Kam Lake MLA Nahendeh Chair, Government Operations Chair, Social Development R.J. Simpson Julie Green MLA Hay River North MLA Yellowknife Centre Deputy Chair, Government Operations Deputy Chair, Social Development Tom Beaulieu Frederick Blake, Jr. Daniel McNeely MLA Tu Nedhé-Wiilideh MLA Mackenzie Delta MLA Sahtu Michael M. Nadli Herbert Nakimayak Kevin O'Reilly MLA Deh Cho MLA Nunakput MLA Frame Lake COMMITTEE STAFF Jennifer Franki-Smith, Michael Ball, Sarah Kay Committee Clerks April Taylor, Megan Welsh, Gustavo Oliveira, Lee Selleck Committee Advisors Northwestij Territories Legislative Assembly Territoires du Assemblee legislative Nord-Ouest May 29, 2018 SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Mr. Speaker: Your Standing Committees on Government Operations and Social Development are pleased to provide their Report on the Review of Bill 6, Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act and commend it to the House. Shane Thompson Kieran Testart Chair, Chair, Standing Committee on Standing Committee on Social Development Government Operations P.O. Box 1320. Yellowknife. Northwest Territories X1A 2L9 • Tel: 867-767-9130 • Fax: 867-920-4735 c. P. 1320. Yellowknife. Territoires du Nord-Ouest X1A 2L9 · Tel.: 867-767-9130 • Telecopieur: 867-920-4735 www.assembly.gov.nt.ca Litr'iljil 1\\\ I' I cnjit • fkgha ldck'ctct..:d.5hbekc • (,ohdli :\,kh ·-'1, 1- 'aodle I C.:nagedch Gok'ch • l·k'c tdllso Dop \\enipht .. ' e kop • llaSI\H'\\In \ 1.'imfi,, 1 pa~ h' 111 • Beba ·1dcgeth D<:nc Dcltth'i • \ 1ahgahuqllt • \1ahrulllmqtiqp:ut Knt1111a\ iat • Lc-L.d>~bnboc STANDING COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT ON THE REVIEW OF BILL 6: Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................1 Our Review of Bill 6....................................................................................................1 What We Heard..........................................................................................................2 Economic Growth and Job Creation.. .....................................................................2 Support for private-sector cannabis stores..........................................................2 Impacts of the liquor commission model on small communities..........................3 Record suspension..............................................................................................4 Revenues and taxation........................................................................................4 Public education......................................................................................................5 Public health and safety..........................................................................................5 Addictions treatment............................................................................................5 Alcohol and drugs in our communities.................................................................6 Co-location of cannabis and alcohol. ..................................................................7 Enforcement capacity and community resources................................................8 Impaired driving and road safety.........................................................................8 Medical cannabis. ..............................................................................................9 Possession limits............................................................................................... 9 Regulating cannabis use in public places. ........................................................10 Regulating cannabis use in licensed establishments. .......................................10 Workplace use and impairment.........................................................................11 Youth.....................................................................................................................11 Legal age ...........................................................................................................11 Purchase and possession by minors.................................................................12 Other Issues..........................................................................................................12 Page i of ii Community control .......................................................................................... 12 Jurisdiction ...................................................................................................... 13 Mandatory review of legislation ....................................................................... 13 What We Did .......................................................................................................... 13 Clause-by-clause review of Bill 6........................................................................ 14 Recommendations.............................................................................................. 18 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 22 Appendix – Public Engagement on Bill 6 ............................................................... 23 Public Hearings .................................................................................................. 23 Other Meetings ................................................................................................... 24 Page ii of ii Committee Report 7-18(3) May 29, 2018 STANDING COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT ON THE REVIEW OF BILL 6: Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act INTRODUCTION In April 2017, the federal government introduced two bills to legalize cannabis in Canada. Bill C-45 deals with federal licensing and oversight of the cannabis supply chain, including all production and distribution, and sets regulatory standards to protect public health and safety. Bill C-46 sets out offences and procedures relating to impaired driving. To avoid having this default federal framework imposed on the Northwest Territories, when the Government of Canada legalizes cannabis across the country, it is necessary for the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) to adopt its own framework. To create these rules, which pick up where federal legislation leaves off, the GNWT introduced Bill 6, the Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act. Bill 6 proposed two new laws for cannabis control: the Cannabis Products Act and the Cannabis Smoking Control Act. To address drug-impaired driving, it also proposed amendments to current provisions of the territorial Motor Vehicles Act. This omnibus bill is the proposed legislation under review here. OUR REVIEW OF BILL 6 On March 1, 2018, Bill 6 received second reading in the Legislative Assembly of the Northwest Territories and was referred to standing committee for review. The Standing Committee on Government Operations reviews activities of the Department of Finance, which will administer the Cannabis Products Act once it becomes law. Similarly, the Standing Committee on Social Development reviews activities of the Department of Health and Social Services, which will administer the Cannabis Smoking Control Act once it becomes law. These committees also share membership with the Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment, which reviews activities of the Department of Infrastructure, which in turn administers the Motor Vehicles Act. For this reason, the standing committees, operating as the “joint committee” – with no pun intended – have worked together to review the bill. Between April 23 and May 4, 2018, we travelled to 16 communities, holding 16 public hearings. We also met with students at six schools to gather input from Northerners. These communities and schools are listed in an appendix. We received 15 written submissions, and have undertaken our own research, including a review of proposed cannabis legislation and best practices across the country. Standing Committee on Government Operations Standing Committee on Social Development Page 1 of 24 Committee Report 7-18(3) May 29, 2018 In our review, we have assumed that the federal enabling legislation will be passed. Neither the standing committees nor the Government of the Northwest Territories may change or overrule this federal legislation. As Regular Members, our approach to Bill 6 has focused on the need to ensure that as much as possible, territorial cannabis legislation best reflects the wishes of the people of the Northwest Territories. Our report is divided into two portions. First, we discuss what we heard from the public during our tour. Then we discuss what we did – a combination of motions to amend the bill and policy recommendations to the GNWT. The bill debated in the House after we have formally submitted our report to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly will reflect the changes we have made. WHAT WE HEARD Economic Growth
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tuktoyaktuk: Offshore Oil and a New Arctic Urbanism
    TUKTOYAKTUK: OFFSHORE OIL AND A NEW ARCTIC URBANISM Pamela riTChoT Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/thld_a_00133 by guest on 29 September 2021 PAMELA RITCHOT In 2008, the Canadian Government accepted BP’s $1.18 billion bid for the largest block of offshore oil exploration licenses in the Beaufort Sea. As climate change continues to lengthen the ice-free open water season, oil companies like BP, Exxon Mobil, and Imperial Oil have gained access to previously inaccessible Arctic waters, finding lucrative incentive to expand offshore drilling in its remote territories. Thus the riches of the Canadian Arctic are heightening its status as a highly complex territory of global concern at the nexus of several overlapping geopolitical, environmental, and economic crises, and are placing the construction of its landscape under the auspices of offshore oil development. At the edge of the Beaufort Sea, FIG. 1 — Tuktoyaktuk at the gateway to the hamlet of Tuktoyaktuk is geographically positioned as the the Canadian Arctic. Courtesy of author. gateway to these riches, and politically positioned to face this unique confluence occurring across four streams of issues: first, the global crisis of climate change as it rapidly reshapes a once- frozen landscape; second, the massive development potential under oil and gas exploration that is only possible through big industry; third, the history of cultural and geopolitical struggle of the indigenous Inuvialuit people; and fourth, the wielding of national sovereignty through aggressive federal plans for Arctic development FIG. 1. By maximizing the development potential of each issue, and mitigating their possible harmful effects in this fragile context, the various players in this confluence can position Canada’s Arctic territory for a future of urban and architectural opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants and Contributions Results Report 2015 – 2016
    TABLED DOCUMENT 230-18(2) TABLED ON NOVEMBER 3, 2016 Grants and Contributions Results Report 2015 – 2016 November 2016 If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree ch yat k . w n w , ts n . ch Ɂ ht s n n yat t a h ts k a y yat th at , n w ts n y t . Chipewyan n h h t hat k at h nah h n na ts ah . South Slavey K hsh t n k h ht y n w n . North Slavey ii wan ak i hii in k at at i hch hit yin hthan , iits t in hkh i. Gwich in Uvanittuaq ilitchurisukupku Inuvialuktun, ququaqluta. Inuvialuktun ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑎᑎᕐᒃᑲᐃᑦ ᐱᔪᒪᒍᕕᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᓕᕐᒃᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑎᑦ. Inuktitut Hapkua titiqqat pijumagupkit Inuinnaqtun, uvaptinnut hivajarlutit. Inuinnaqtun Aboriginal Languages Secretariat: 867-767-9346 ext. 71037 Francophone Affairs Secretariat: 867-767-9343 TABLE OF CONTENTS MINISTER’S MESSAGE ....................................................................................................................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Preface .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Territories Liquor Licensing Board 65Th Annual Report
    TD 531-18(3) TABLED ON AUGUST 22, 2019 Northwest Territories Liquor Licensing Board 65th Annual Report 2018 - 2019 201 June 27th, 9 Honourable Robert C. McLeod Minister Responsible for the NWT Liquor Licensing Board Dear Honourable Minister McLeod: In accordance with the Liquor Act, I am pleased to present the Northwest Territories Liquor Licensing Board’s 201 - 201 Annual Report. 8 9 Sincerely, Sandra Aitken Chairperson Contents Chairperson’s Message ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Board Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Board Members and Staff .............................................................................................................................. 2 Board Activity ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Total Meetings ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Administration and Orientation Meetings .............................................................................................. 4 Licence Applications and Board Requests .............................................................................................. 4 Compliance Hearings .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inuvialuit For
    D_156905_inuvialuit_Cover 11/16/05 11:45 AM Page 1 UNIKKAAQATIGIIT: PUTTING THE HUMAN FACE ON CLIMATE CHANGE PERSPECTIVES FROM THE INUVIALUIT SETTLEMENT REGION UNIKKAAQATIGIIT: PUTTING THE HUMAN FACE ON CLIMATE CHANGE PERSPECTIVES FROM THE INUVIALUIT SETTLEMENT REGION Workshop Team: Inuvialuit Regional Corporation (IRC), Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK), International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Centre Hospitalier du l’Université du Québec (CHUQ), Joint Secretariat: Inuvialuit Renewable Resource Committees (JS:IRRC) Funded by: Northern Ecosystem Initiative, Environment Canada * This workshop is part of a larger project entitled Identifying, Selecting and Monitoring Indicators for Climate Change in Nunavik and Labrador, funded by NEI, Environment Canada This report should be cited as: Communities of Aklavik, Inuvik, Holman Island, Paulatuk and Tuktoyaktuk, Nickels, S., Buell, M., Furgal, C., Moquin, H. 2005. Unikkaaqatigiit – Putting the Human Face on Climate Change: Perspectives from the Inuvialuit Settlement Region. Ottawa: Joint publication of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, Nasivvik Centre for Inuit Health and Changing Environments at Université Laval and the Ajunnginiq Centre at the National Aboriginal Health Organization. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Naitoliogak . 1 1.0 Summary . 2 2.0 Acknowledgements . 3 3.0 Introduction . 4 4.0 Methods . 4 4.1 Pre-Workshop Methods . 4 4.2 During the Workshop . 5 4.3 Summarizing Workshop Observations . 6 5.0 Observations. 6 5.1 Regional (Common) Concerns . 7 Changes to Weather: . 7 Changes to Landscape: . 9 Changes to Vegetation: . 10 Changes to Fauna: . 11 Changes to Insects: . 11 Increased Awareness And Stress: . 11 Contaminants: . 11 Desire For Organization: . 12 5.2 East-West Discrepancies And Patterns . 12 Changes to Weather .
    [Show full text]
  • Community Resistance Land Use And
    COMMUNITY RESISTANCE LAND USE AND WAGE LABOUR IN PAULATUK, N.W.T. by SHEILA MARGARET MCDONNELL B.A. Honours, McGill University, 1976 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Geography) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1983 G) Sheila Margaret McDonnell, 1983 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 DE-6 (3/81) ABSTRACT This paper discusses community resistance to the imposition of an external industrial socio-economic system and the destruction of a distinctive land-based way of life. It shows how historically Inuvialuit independence has been eroded by contact with the external economic system and the assimilationist policies of the government. In spite of these pressures, however, the Inuvialuit have struggled to retain their culture and their land-based economy. This thesis shows that hunting and trapping continue to be viable and to contribute significant income, both cash and income- in-kind to the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Priorities for Land Use and Development in the Northwest
    PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH BRIEF Priorities for Land Use and Development in the Northwest Territories Highlights from a telephone survey of NWT residents conducted November 4-9, 2015 for Ducks Unlimited by Ekos Research Public Opinion Brief: Priorities for Land Use and Development in the NWT - 2015 INTRODUCTION This research brief summarizes the results of a random digit dial telephone poll of NWT residents conducted for Ducks Unlimited Canada by the professional polling firm Ekos Research ​ ​ Associates. The poll interviewed a representative sample of 456 aboriginal and non-aboriginal residents by landline and cellphone November 4-9, 2015. A random sample of 456 is considered accurate to within ±4.59% 19 times out of 20. Interviews were carried out in communities across the region, including the following: Aklavik Fort Resolution Tsiigehtchic Behchokò Fort Simpson Tuktoyaktuk Colville Lake Fort Smith Tulita Déline Gamètì Ulukhaktok Enterprise Hay River Wekweètì Fort Good Hope Inuvik Whatì Fort Liard Lutselk'e Yellowknife Fort McPherson Norman Wells Fort Providence Paulatuk SURVEY FINDINGS Page 2 Public Opinion Brief: Priorities for Land Use and Development in the NWT - 2015 1. In the NWT today, cost of living and the environment are the issues foremost in the public mind, followed by economic development and jobs. To identify the issues most salient to the public, the first question on the survey asked NWT residents to name what they felt was the most important issues affecting the NWT, unaided, without prompting or pre-set answers. Results suggest that the top-of-mind issues for NWT residents are cost of living (24%) and the environment (20%), each eliciting more mentions than any other issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth and Growth of Porsild Pingo
    ARCTIC VOL. 41, NO. 4 (DECEMBER 1988) P. 267-274 The Birth and Growth of Porsilc1 Pingo, Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula, District of Mackenzie J. ROSS MACKAY’ (Received 21 March 1988; accepted in revised form I June 1988) ABSTRACT. The birth and growth of Porsild Pingo (ice-cored hill) can be taken as fairly representative of the birth and growth of the more than 2000 closed-system pingos of the western arctic coast of Canada and adjacent Alaska. Porsild Pingo, named after a distinguished arctic botanist, has grown in the bottom of a large lake that drained catastrophically about 1900. Porsild Pingo has grown up at the site of a former shallow residual pond. The “birth” probably took place between 1920 and 1930. The high pore water pressure that caused updoming of the bottom of the residual pond to give birth to Porsild Pingo came from pore water expulsion by downward and upward permafrost growth in saturated sands in a closed system. In the freeze-back period of October-November 1934, permafrost ruptured and the intrusion of water into the unfrozen part of the active layer grew a 3.7 m high frost mound photographed by Porsild in May 1935. Porsild Pingo has grown up at, or very close to, the site of the former frost mound. The growth of Porsild Pingo appears to have been fairly steady from 1935 to 1976, after which there has been a decline to 1987. The growth rate has been nearly linear with height, from zero at the periphery to a maximum at the top. The present addition of water to the pingo is about 630 m’.y”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Temperatures and Permafrost Warming from Forest to Tundra, Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands and Anderson Plain, NWT, Canada
    PERMAFROST AND PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES Permafrost and Periglac. Process. 28: 543–551 (2017) Published online 23 March 2017 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/ppp.1934 Ground Temperatures and Permafrost Warming from Forest to Tundra, Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands and Anderson Plain, NWT, Canada S. V. Kokelj,1* M. J. Palmer,2 T. C. Lantz3 and C. R. Burn4 1 Northwest Territories Geological Survey, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Canada 2 Cumulative Impact Monitoring Program, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Canada 3 School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia Canada 4 Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ABSTRACT Annual mean ground temperatures (Tg) decline northward from approximately À3.0°C in the boreal forest to À7.0°C in dwarf-shrub tundra in the Tuktoyuktuk Coastlands and Anderson Plain, NWT, Canada. The latitudinal decrease in Tg from forest to tundra is accompanied by an increase in the range of values measured in the central, tall-shrub tun- dra zone. Field measurements from 124 sites across this ecotone indicate that in undisturbed terrain Tg may approach 0°C in the forest and À4°C in dwarf-shrub tundra. The greatest range of local variation in Tg (~7°C) was observed in the tall-shrub transition zone. Undisturbed terrain units with relatively high Tg include riparian areas and slopes with drifting snow, saturated soils in polygonal peatlands and areas near lakes. Across the region, the warmest permafrost is associated with disturbances such as thaw slumps, drained lakes, areas burned by wildfires, drilling-mud sumps and roadsides.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Development and Infrastructure Projects in the North
    NorthernNorthern ProjectsProjects ManagementManagement OfficeOffice CanNor ! !AlertAlert i NaturalNatural Resource Resource Development Development andand Infrastructure Infrastructure Projects Projects ii LegendLegend in thein the Yukon, Yukon, Northwest Northwest Territories and and Nunavut Nunavut i Operating MineMine Natural Resource Project TheThe Northern Northern Projects Projects Management Management OfficeOffice (NPMO),(NPMO), asas partpart of ofthe the Natural Resource Project CanadianCanadian Northern Northern Economic Economic Development Development AgencyAgency (CanNor), (CanNor), advances advances Highway Project northernnorthern resource resource development development by providingproviding issues issues management, management, Capital path-findingpath-finding and and advice advice to to industry industry and communities; coordinates coordinates the the Community northernnorthern regulatory regulatory responsibilities responsibilities ofof federal departments; departments; and an publiclyd publicly trackstracks the the progress progress of of projects projects toto bring transparency,transparency, timeliness timeliness and and ThisThis map map represents represents operatingoperating mines mines effectivenesseffectiveness to to thethe regulatory system. system. andand projects projects that that havehave entered the the environmentalenvironmental assessment assessment phase, phase, as wellas ForFor more more information information please contactcontact us us at at wellas projects as projects that are that expected are
    [Show full text]
  • Aklisuktuk (Growing Fast) Pingo, Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula, Northwest Territories, Canada J
    ARCTIC VOL, 34, NO. 3 (SEPTEMBER 1981). P. 270-273 Aklisuktuk (Growing Fast) Pingo, Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula, Northwest Territories, Canada J. ROSS MACKAY’ ABSTRACT. Field surveys have been carried out for the 1972 to 1979 period in order to study the growth of Aklisuktuk (Growing Fast) Pingo. The field surveys show that the top of the pingo was slowly subsiding dsring the seven-year survey period, possibly from a slow downslope glacier-like creep of the ice-rich overburden and ice core. The name “Aklisuktuk” probably dates back at least 200 years. The rapid growth which attracted attention was from accumulation of water in a large sub-pingo water lens. Key words: Aklisuktuk Pingo, sub-pingo water lens, pingo subsidence RÉSUMÉ: Des lev& sur le champs ont kt6 effectues entre1972 et 1979en vue d’ktudier le pingoAklisuktuk (“grandi vite”). Leslevks ont indique que le sommet du pingo s’est lentement affaisse au cours dela pkriodede lev6 de sept ans, possiblement B cause du lent avancement genre glacier du terrain de couverture riche en glace et du noyau de glace. Le nom “Aklisuktuk” date probablement d’il y a aumoins 200 ans. La croissance rapide qui a attire l’attention a kt6 causke par l’accumulation d’eau dans une grande poche au-dessous du pingo. Mots clés: Pingo Aklisuktuk, poche d’eau au-dessous du pingo, affaissement du pingo Traduit par Maurice Guibord, Le Centre Français, The University of Calgary. INTRODUCTION Pingos are ice-cored hills which can grow only in a permafrost environment. There are about 1450 pingos in the Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula area (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Inuvialuit Development Corporation in Sachs Harbour
    Ublaami. Uvlaami. Ublaakut. Vol. 25 Issue 4 December 2020 Inuvialuit Corporate Group Update IRC Board of Directors Meeting and Motions IRC Board Meeting Call to Order Inuvialuit Investment Corporation (IIC) Duane Smith, Chair & Chief Executive Officer called the IIC Chair, Floyd Roland, reported to the IRC Board of Directors November 17-19 meeting to order at 9:15 am. He welcomed by teleconference from Yellowknife. He offered some caution to everyone to the meeting in attendance in person and over the MS the IRC Board as it continues to be challenging to continue to Teams videoconference app. In person, Duane welcomed CC Chair achieve strong returns in the markets. IIC management is heavily and IRC Board Members Ryan Yakeleya (Tuktoyaktuk), Jordan involved with the investment managers and with the added market McLeod (Aklavik), John Lucas Jr. (Sachs Harbour), Lawrence volatility and the effects of COVID, staff have been working much Ruben (Paulatuk), Colin Okheena (Ulukhaktok) and Gerald harder to keep the portfolio performing. Portfolio value is $563M, (Jerry) Inglangasuk (Inuvik). IRC staff Director of Operations up from $540M at prior YE, YTD revenue is $24.9M, up from Lucy Kuptana and Chief Administrative Officer Todd Orvitz $19.2M budget. Portfolio fees continue to be well below market. were present at IRC Corporate Group Building Umingmak Board IIC has outperformed the market by 3% over the last year, and that Room. They were joined by Special Advisor Kate Darling and 3% is worth over $16M of extra profit in the last 12 months. Chief Financial OfficerMark Fleming on video. Inuvialuit Petroleum Corporation (IPC) Colin Okheena provided an opening prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Court Circuits – 2021 Page 1
    TERRITORIAL COURT CIRCUITS – 2021 PAGE 1 Week YELLOWKNIFE – YELLOWKNIFE - BEAUFORT DELTA SAHTU REGION, HAY RIVER, DEHCHO HOLIDAYS/OTHER Mon-Fri 1ST 2ND REGION TŁĮCHǪ REGION & & (Courtroom #202) (Courtroom #101) ŁUTSELK'E SOUTH OF THE LAKE YK * Mandatory Leave (23rd-24th) December *Christmas (25th) Stat 2020 Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only *Boxing Day (26th) Stat 21 – 25* YK *Boxing Day Stat (28th) Dec 28 – *Mandatory Leave (29th - 31st) Jan 1, Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only *New Year’s Day (1st) Stat 2021* YK 4 – 8 Wellness/DVTO (7th) YK YK 2nd 11 – 15 13th, 14th, 15th YK Inuvik (19th, 20th+) Délįne (18th) Fort Smith (18th-20th) No Out-of-Custody Docket on Jan. Fort McPherson (21st, Tulita (19th) 19, 2021 18 – 22 Wellness/DVTO (21st) 22nd) Fort Good Hope (20th) Remote Circuit Norman Wells (21st) Held by Teleconference YK YK 2nd Inuvik (26th, 27th+) Behchoko (26th-29th+) Tuktoyaktuk (28th, 29th) 25 – 29 27th, 28th, 29th * indicates short week. ** see HOLIDAYS/OTHER column for further information. SCHEDULE UPDATED: September 21, 2021 PUBLIC - 2021 TERRITORIAL COURT CIRCUITS – 2021 PAGE 2 Week YELLOWKNIFE – YELLOWKNIFE - BEAUFORT DELTA SAHTU REGION, HAY RIVER, DEHCHO HOLIDAYS/OTHER Mon-Fri 1ST 2ND REGION TŁĮCHǪ REGION & & (Courtroom #202) (Courtroom #101) ŁUTSELK'E SOUTH OF THE LAKE YK Inuvik (2nd-5th) Whatì (2nd) Hay River (1st, 2nd) No Out-of-Custody Docket on Feb. 2, February Łutselk’e (3rd) DVTO (1st) 2021 1 - 5 Wellness/DVTO (4th) C.P. Hearing YK YK 2nd Inuvik (9th-12th) Hay River (8th, 9th) DVTO (8th) 8 – 12 10th, 11th, 12th C.P.
    [Show full text]