Silverleaf whitefl y alert for soybean growers March 2003

Natalie Moore1, Robin Gunning2, Hugh Brier3, Which is it? and oval in shape with red ‘eyes’. Most SLW Bernie Franzman4, Greg Mills3, Don McCaffery5. nymph stages are immobile and pupate in situ on the leaf. 1 NSW , Grafton, NSW, ; Silverleaf whitefl y (SLW) is the B-biotype of the whitefl y tabaci. The B-biotype is a 2 NSW Agriculture, Tamworth, NSW, Australia; pesticide-resistant strain of B. tabaci that has Why is the B-biotype of SLW so gained entry into Australia, most likely from 3 Department of Primary Industries, Kingaroy, the of America. SLW is a major difficult to manage? Qld, Australia; global of horticultural and agricultural SLW has resistance to many common 4 Department of Primary Industries, crops and is highly resistant to most current pesticides. SLW can occur in uncontrollable pesticides, including organophosphates, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia; plagues with billions of individuals per carbamates and synthetic pyrethroids. 5 NSW Agriculture, Orange, NSW, Australia hectare of crop. Australian experience and research shows SLW can develop resistance to pesticides extremely rapidly, due in part to its short What do SLW look like? generation time (egg to adult in as little as 12 days in summer) and to the huge populations Silverleaf whitefl ies are small, fragile sap- that can develop (billions/ha). It generates sucking in the same bug sub-order resistance to chemicals much faster than as aphids and scale insects. Adults have Helicoverpa armigera. powdery white wings and are only 1.5 mm long (see Fig. 1).

SLW is similar to, but smaller than, greenhouse whitefl y Trialeurodes( vaporariorum) and has a distinct gap between its forewings. SLW can only be distinguished from other strains of B. tabaci by biochemical testing (see Monitoring and identifi cation below). Eggs are laid on the underside of leaves, are very small and sit on a pedicle or stalk. When laid en masse, the eggs can look like brown velvet. Whitefl y nymphs settle Fig. 1. Adults (1.5mm long) and nymphs of silverleaf whitefly on the under leaves and become sedentary like scale underside of a soybean leaf. insects. Nymphs are pale yellow-green, fl at Photo N. Moore, NSW Agriculture. What damage can it cause? establish in Australia are still unknown. Where to look for SLW Predictions have been made about potential areas for spread of SLW but more SLW sucks sap from the plant and can SLW survives on a wide range of crops, information needs to be gathered from rapidly generate large populations, which weeds and ornamental plants including, but soybean cropping areas to determine which reduce crop yields. Like aphids, SLW also not limited to, the following: ones are likely to be most at risk. Although secretes ‘honey dew’, a food source for SLW may spread throughout soybean sooty mould that covers leaves with black ■ Highly preferred hosts such as soybean, growing areas, it is not known whether it growth and reduces photosynthesis (Fig. 2). melon, sunfl ower (young), , will necessarily cause bladder ketmia (Hibiscus trionum - see economic damage in all Figs. 3 and 4), native rosella (Abelmoschus regions.regions. fi culneus), Convolvulaceae vines, for example, cow vine (Ipomoea lonchophylla) In general, areasareas with and bell vine (Ipomoea plebeia), sow hot summers, mild or milk thistle (Sonchus oleraceus), winters and a year-roundyear-round and Euphorbia weeds, abundance of susceptible and many ornamental plants. host plants areare consideredconsidered to be at highest risk. ■ Less preferred hosts that may still However,However, some areasareas at support large populations include , lesser risk may experience sunfl ower (mature), pumpkin, peanuts, outbreaksoutbreaks when and pasture legumes (including lucerne). conditions areare favourable. Numerous other plants may support Soybean productionproduction SLW, especially when populations fl are. areasareas consideredconsidered to be at greatestgreatest risk include Fig. 2. Soybean crop severely affected by sooty mould due coastal Queensland to silverleaf whitefly infestation. Photo N. Moore, NSW (Qld) (including the Lockyer and Fassifern Agriculture. valleys), central Qld, and the Northern Rivers district of New South Wales (NSW). Once SLW populations explode little can Production areas at lesser risk include the be done to control them and crops can be inland Burnett and Darling Downs in Qld decimated in a short time if conditions are and the North West slopes in NSW. favourable (for example, hot, dry weather). Many cotton and soybean crops in Central Queensland were devastated by SLW in the We need to identify your 2001-2002 season. ! If you suspect an outbreak of Please contact your local District SLW, please DON’T SPRAY! Agronomist or Entomologist to coordinate the identifi cation of specimens. Biochemical Fig.Fig. 33.. AAdultdult ssilverleafilverleaf wwhiteflyhitefly oonn tthehe wweedeed hhostost bbladderladder kketmiaetmia The fi rst line of action for a SLW outbreak analysis is required to distinguish the (Hibiscus trionum) Photo courtesy N. Forrester, Deltapine. should be identifi cation to confi rm the B- B-biotype - this is done by Dr Robin biotype (see Monitoring and identifi cation Gunning’s team at the Tamworth Centre below). This will determine available for Crop Improvement, NSW Agriculture, control options. If it is the B-biotype, Calala Lane, Tamworth, NSW 2340. don’t be tempted to spray with pesticides. SLW is known to be moderately to highly Your District Agronomist or Entomologist resistant to all commonly used broadacre will also assist you to collect the specimens crop pesticides currently used in Australia. correctly. Spraying with pesticides will likely promote the development of further pesticide ■ Adult fl ies are preferred for analysis. resistance in SLW, kill benefi cial insects and ■ Late-stage nymphs are also acceptable. probably cause the SLW population to fl are, ■ along with other pests such as mites. Send specimens as quickly as possible to arrive in good condition for analysis. Monitoring and identification ■ Keep SLW specimens cool and send alive. Fig.Fig. 44.. SSilverleafilverleaf wwhiteflyhitefly nnymphsymphs ((left)left) aandnd aadultsdults ((right)right) uundernder The areas to which this pest will spread and ■ Do not kill or put in alcohol. bladder ketmia leaves. Photo courtesy N. Forrester, Deltapine. Implications for soybean growers in northern NSW

Presently there are no chemical treatments registered for use against SLW in soybean in Australia. Until effective control measures are found, SLW has the potential to prevent highly susceptible crops, such as soybean, being grown in areas where large populations of the pest become established. After devastating losses to soybean crops in Central Fig. 6. Generalist predators such as Lady beetles (Family , above), lacewings (order Neuoptera) and big-eyed bugs (Geocoris sp.) Queensland (Emerald) and Bundaberg in feed on SLW and can reduce SLW populations provided they are not 2002, soybeans should not be grown in overwhelmed by SLW ‘flares’. Photo N. Moore, NSW Agriculture. these high-risk areas until control measures are developed. This will bring production pressures (and opportunities) to production Pesticides? areas where SLW does not establish in large numbers. The cotton industry in Australia is pursuing Since it was fi rst detected in Darwin and the registration of several new pesticides Tamworth in 1994, monitoring of SLW for SLW as components of an has shown that it is still spreading to new Resistance Management Strategy (IRMS). cropping areas in the Northern Territory, The strategy involves pesticides from Queensland, and New South Wales, (and Fig. 5. An average of 25% yield loss resulted from this infestation at least four different chemical groups in glasshouses in Adelaide and Perth) (R. of SLW (B. tabaci B-biotype) in soybeans north of Ballina in northern (including growth regulators) for use Gunning, pers. comm.). The southern and NSW. The pest appeared in February 2002 in an otherwise healthy, at different stages of the season. Because of vigorous crop. Feeding by the pest and extensive sooty mould, which western limits for its future establishment SLW’s great capacity to develop resistance developed on honey dew produced by the pest, caused the pods not to are unknown. Cold winters are thought to complete filling. Photo N. Moore, NSW Agriculture. to pesticides, the success of such a strategy reduce SLW populations, so the boundaries needs all growers in a region to comply for damaging populations may shift with strict usage patterns so that only one depending on seasonal conditions, but this spray with one type of chemical is allowed cannot be predicted with certainty at this in any one season and no mixes are allowed. stage. Management strategies Coordination is essential so that everyone does ‘the same thing at the same time’ for Whilst SLW has previously been recorded in northern NSW on a variety of horticultural In the absence of pesticides registered for greatest impact on the local SLW populations. crops, only one severe outbreak has been SLW in soybeans, the key strategies at present The success of this strategy will be known in confi rmed in a soybean crop north of Ballina are: the coming seasons. in the 2002 season (see Fig. 5). 1. Weed control year round to remove host Registration of chemicals for use against The impact of control measures used on plants, especially winter hosts SLW in soybean in the future will require the other pests (for example, early season generation of residue (MRL) data. For some organophosphate or synthetic pyrethroid 2. Awareness of the pest, frequent inspection products this may mean a minimum of two sprays) must be considered in areas where of crops, volunteer plants and weeds for years’ trial work. The high cost of some new SLW is known to occur, as these can fl are early detection and identifi cation of SLW pesticides may prove to be prohibitive. SLW populations. This fl aring occurs because ‘harder’ sprays kill many of the benefi cial 3. Avoiding spraying with ‘hard’ chemicals Experience from Central Queensland insects that attack SLW, in particular lady early in the season to protect benefi cial suggests that soaps and oils (for example, beetles and SLW parasites. As well, ‘harder’ insect populations and to avoid fl aring petroleum oils) may be effective in pesticides kill susceptible strains of B. tabaci SLW if present suppressing early SLW population build up resulting in a greater proportion of the B. by ‘smothering’ the nymphs. For effective tabaci population being SLW. 4. Adoption of IPM (integrated pest under-leaf coverage, high volume, ground SLW must be viewed as a multi-pest management) practices that maximise application may be needed. Registration management problem. In developing benefi cial insect populations (see Fig. 6). issues for soaps and oils in soybean were management strategies for SLW we cannot still being investigated at the time of writing focus on SLW alone. Soybean growers 5. Overhead irrigation, where appropriate, (March 2003). Penetration of dense canopy may need to consider more pest-specifi c as there is anecdotal evidence that this can crops such as soybean may make under- controls (for example, NPV or Bt products for reduce sooty mould by washing adults leaf coverage diffi cult to achieve later in the heliothis) to avoid fl aring SLW populations. and honey dew from leaves. season. Parasites and predators has imported one such wasp (Eretmocerus) ■ Dr Robin Gunning’s group at NSW for trials in 2002-2003. These wasps were Agriculture, Tamworth, is continuing to monitor the spread of the B-biotype Farming systems that are being driven effectively used to manage SLW in the and investigating the potential for it to by SLW-susceptible crops (for example, United States of America where refuges develop resistance to new pesticides. cotton and soybeans) and climate must of ‘banker plants’ to host the wasp were introduce a stabilising effect to prevent planted among summer crops and in the ■ Fungal biopesticides of SLW and SLW population fl ares. Year-round winter. other insect pests (for example, Green refuges of suitable plant species that help Vegetable Bug) are being investigated to build up parasites and predators may Other approaches and by Dr Carrie Hauxwell, DPI, Brisbane. achieve this. Researchers are looking at ways of using these means to manage research ■ ‘Soft’ management options for SLW in Australia. Helicoverpa armigera and bug pests are ■ The Area Wide Management (AWM) being developed by Dr Dave Murray A new project led by Dr Richard Sequeira, approach that has been useful for and Hugh Brier respectively (DPI, Department of Primary Industries (DPI), managing Helicoverpa armigera in Toowoomba and Kingaroy). These Emerald, is investigating movement Australia could be useful for SLW options will also reduce the risk of patterns of SLW and the impacts of in the future, particularly in mixed SLW in soybean. benefi cial insect refuges. cropping areas with year-round Research is also under way to import and availability of host crops. Cooperation trial wasps that attack SLW. between plant industries is critical for Dr Paul De Barro of CSIRO in Canberra effective management of this pest.

Further information

Please contact your local NSW Agriculture DISCLAIMER The information in this publication is based on knowledge and or DPI District Agronomist or Entomologist understanding at the time of writing (March 2003). However, because for updated information on this pest. of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the More information is available at the information with the appropriate officer of the New South Wales Department Australian Cotton CRC website: of Agriculture or the user’s independent adviser. Recognising that some information in this document is provided by third parties, the State of New www.cotton.crc.org.au South Wales, the author and the publisher take no responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of any information included in Funding provided by the Australian the document provided by third parties. Oilseeds Federation enabled the production

of this brochure. 4008 - 17/3/03