DOCSLIB.ORG

Medici Et Al 2018 Geological Journal.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Medici Et Al 2018 Geological Journal.Pdf This is a repository copy of Sedimentary flow heterogeneities in the Triassic U.K. Sherwood Sandstone Group: Insights for hydrocarbon exploration. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/131868/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Medici, G, West, LJ orcid.org/0000-0002-3441-0433 and Mountney, NP orcid.org/0000-0002-8356-9889 (2019) Sedimentary flow heterogeneities in the Triassic U.K. Sherwood Sandstone Group: Insights for hydrocarbon exploration. Geological Journal, 54 (3). pp. 1361-1378. ISSN 0072-1050 https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3233 (c) 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: 'Medici, G, West, LJ and Mountney, NP (2018) Sedimentary flow heterogeneities in the Triassic U.K. Sherwood Sandstone Group: Insights for hydrocarbon exploration. Geological Journal,' which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3233]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 1 Sedimentary flow heterogeneities in the Triassic UK Sherwood Sandstone Group: Insights 2 for hydrocarbon exploration 3 1 1 1 4 Giacomo Medici L. Jared West Nigel P. Mountney 5 1 6 School of Earth and Environment, the University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 7 8 Correspondence 9 Giacomo Medici, School of Earth and Environment, the University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, 10 UK. Email: [email protected] 11 12 Abstract 13 Fluvial and aeolian sedimentary successions host important hydrocarbon resources as well as 14 major groundwater aquifers. This review of the lithological characteristics of Triassic fluvio 15 aeolian successions of the Sherwood Sandstone Group (UK) demonstrates how distance from a 16 fluvial sediment source and rate of riftrelated tectonic subsidence play important roles in 17 governing reservoir quality in continental successions. Increasing distance from the fluvial 18 sediment source area results in increased porosity and permeability in deposits of mixed fluvial 19 and aeolian reservoir successions that accumulated in arid and semiarid settings. Indeed, 20 successions of the UK Sherwood Sandstone Group reveal an increase in the proportion of highly 21 permeable deposits of aeolian origin with increasing distance from the principal uplands, 22 represented by the Armorican Massif in northern France, which formed the main source for 23 delivery of fluvial sediment to a series of rift basins. A progressive reduction in the discharge of 24 fluvial systems entering and passing through a series of interlinked rift basins encouraged 25 aeolian accumulation in more distal basins. Extensional tectonics enabled preservation of highly 26 permeable aeolian facies in basins subject to high rates (> ~100 m/Myr) of tectonic subsidence 27 by rapidly placing such deposits below the water table. However, successions exclusively 28 characterized by fluvial lithofacies record decreases in both porosity and permeability with 29 increasing distance (~250750 km) from the sediment source due to the coupling of porosity 30 reduction and increasing clay content. 31 Keywords aeolian, fluvial, heterogeneities, permeability, reservoir, sediment source, subsidence. 32 33 1 INTRODUCTION 2 34 Fluvial and aeolian deposits commonly form thick sedimentary successions (>1 km) in basins 35 for which accommodation was generated in response to compressional, strikeslip and 36 extensional tectonics, as well as thermal subsidence (Bosellini, 1989; Doglioni, 1987; Hounslow 37 & Muttoni, 2010; Waugh, 1973). For example, continental deposits of fluvial and aeolian origin 38 represent much of the fill of the Paradox Foreland Basin of Pennsylvanian to Permian age in 39 Utah, USA (Condon, 1997). Fluvial sedimentary successions of Triassic to Cretaceous age 40 characterize transtensional basins associated with Euphrates strikeslip fault system in Syria 41 (Litak et al., 1998). Siliciclastic deposits of fluvial and aeolian origin also represent significant 42 components of the fills of rift basins that develop extensively at the onset of Wilson Cycles 43 during supercontinent breakup (Bosellini & Hsü, 1973; Preto, Kustatscher, & Wignall, 2010; 44 Ruffell, McKinley, & Worden, 2002; Wilson, 1963). Examples of such continental deposits are 45 especially well preserved in PermoTriassic successions due to the initial phase of rifting of 46 Pangaea. These synrift deposits are globally widespread; they are represented in North and 47 South America, Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia (Jones, Somerville, & Strogen, 1988; Waugh, 48 1973). 49 Siliciclastic deposits of continental origin can serve as important hosts for hydrocarbon, 50 geothermal and groundwater resources (Aldinucci, Gandin, & Sandrelli, 2008; Cassidy et al., 51 2014; McKie & Williams, 2009; Tellam & Barker, 2006). Mesozoic sedimentary successions of 52 mixed fluvial and aeolian origin host major groundwater aquifers in Europe, as well as in North 53 America (Olivarius et al., 2015; Swanson Bahr, Bradbury, & Anderson, 2006; Tellam, 2004). A 54 review of their hydrogeological properties, where successions have not been subjected to 55 significant groundwater alteration, is useful to provide information for reservoir characterization 56 at depths > ~1 km (Medici, West, & Mountney, 2016, 2018). However, the great majority of 57 published research on analogues of hydrocarbon reservoirs focuses on seismic and outcrop 58 studies for sedimentary and fault structure characterization (e.g., Antonellini, Aydin, & Pollard, 59 1994; Miall, 2006; Torabi & Fossen, 2009), rather than on flow properties. However, previous 60 reviews on the sedimentary heterogeneities of fluvial and aeolian successions treat allogenic 61 factors known to influence fluvial and aeolian sedimentation (Bourquin et al., 2011; Hounslow 62 & Ruffell, 2006, Hounslow, McKie, & Ruffell, 2012; McKie & Williams, 2009), separately from 63 the physical properties of aquifers (Allen et al. 1997; Tellam & Barker, 2006) and reservoirs 64 (Moraes & Surdam, 1993). 65 Furthermore, some studies on the hydraulic properties of such sandstones aim solely to 66 characterize the centimetrescale properties of the rock matrix, using core plugs (e.g., 67 Bloomfield, Moreau, & Newell, 2006, Krystinik, 1990; Prosser & Maskall, 1993). Yet, both core 3 68 plug and well testscale data are required jointly to effectively quantify the impact of geological 69 heterogeneities on flow, and to guide hydrocarbon exploration in terms of drilling strategy 70 (Corbett et al. 2012). To date, such multiscale studies have focussed primarily on fluvial 71 deposits at various depth intervals (Corbett, Hamidreza, & Hemant, 2012; Medici et al., 2016, 72 2018; Zheng, Corbett, Ryseth, & Stewart, 2000; Zheng, Corbett, & Emery, 2003). By contrast, 73 this work reviews the multiscale hydraulic properties of deposits of both aeolian and fluvial 74 origin, relating them to the palaeoenvironmental setting at their time of deposition. 75 The absence of significant effects relating to compressional tectonics in the Triassic continental 76 successions of NW Europe favours hydraulic characterization of sedimentary heterogeneities 77 (Chadwick, 1997; Chadwick, Kirby, & Baily, 1994). Notably, the UK Sherwood Sandstone 78 Group (Figure 1a, b) in NW Europe represents a continental succession representative of an 79 active rift setting (Ziegler, 1988; Chadwick, 1997). This succession is here specifically selected 80 for review of flow heterogeneity because a large amount of borehole information is available 81 (Allen et al., 1997; Nirex, 1992ac; 1993ac; 1996a, b). Notably, a diverse suite of background 82 hydrogeological data (e.g., matrix porosity and permeability tests, packer and pumping tests) is 83 available for this Triassic succession for the following reasons: (i) it represents the second most 84 important UK aquifer in terms of abstraction volume (Edmunds & Smedley, 2000); (ii) it 85 comprises the bedrock of large industrial cities such as Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester 86 (Tellam & Barker, 2006); and (iii) it represents a reservoir lithology in the onshore areas in 87 Dorset, southern England (Worden, Benshatwan, Potts, & Elgarmadi, 2016) and offshore areas, 88 such as the eastern Irish Sea Basin (Meadows & Beach, 1993a, b; Tyrrell, Leleu, Souders, 89 Haughton, & Daly, 2009) and the North Sea (McKie, Jolley, & Kristensen, 2010; Nguyen et al., 90 2013). 91 The Sherwood Sandstone Group crops out in several UK Triassic basins (Figure 1b). These 92 basins are characterized by different subsidence rates and developed at various distances from 93 the main fluvial sediment source area, which is represented by the Armorican Massif in northern 94 France (Morton, Hounslow, & Frei, 2013; Tyrrell, Haughton, Souders, Daly, & Shannon, 2012). 95 Core plug (porosity,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Geological Evolution of Warwickshire Jonathan D
    The Geological Evolution of Warwickshire Jonathan D. Radley Abstract: The geology of the central English county of Warwickshire demonstrates 600 million years of continental drift, tectonism and palaeoenvironmental change. Neoproterozoic and Lower Palaeozoic rocks demonstrate island arc accretion, Cambrian marine transgression, and Ordovician subduction-related intrusive igneous activity. Times from Upper Palaeozoic to Triassic witnessed mainly continental environments at equatorial and circum-equatorial latitudes, including deposition of coal measures and red-beds. Latest Triassic marine transgression ultimately led to deposition of richly fossiliferous Jurassic sediments. The solid geological succession and its structure indicate several episodes of folding, faulting and erosion, influenced by deep-seated structural lineaments within the central English Precambrian basement. The modern landscape is influenced by these ancient structures and reflects Palaeogene and Neogene uplift and erosion, as well as further changes by Quaternary erosion and weathering, and glacial and fluvial deposition. Warwickshire demonstrates remarkable geodiversity, Horst, bounded partly by the Polesworth Fault in the with a mainly sedimentary succession representing northeast and by the Western Boundary Fault (Fig. 2). roughly 600 million years of Earth history. The county These faults and a number of other local structures is characterised by a mainly agricultural landscape appear to be underpinned by deep-seated lineaments of low, rolling hills and vales. Covering an area of within the largely concealed Precambrian basement just under 2000 sq km, Warwickshire tells a story of of the Midlands Microcraton (Lee et al., 1990). In continental drift across the face of the globe, tectonism, climate change, biological extinctions and sweeping evolutionary changes among the region’s plant and animal inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • Triassic: Seasonal Rivers, Dusty Deserts and Saline Lakes
    Triassic: seasonal rivers, dusty deserts and saline lakes Ruffell, A., & Hounslow, M. (2006). Triassic: seasonal rivers, dusty deserts and saline lakes. In P. F. Rawson, & P. Brenchley (Eds.), The Geology of England & Wales. (pp. 295-325). Geological Society of London. Published in: The Geology of England & Wales. Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:28. Sep. 2021 Triassic: seasonal rivers, 13 dusty deserts and saline lakes M. W. HOUNSLOW & A. H. RUFFELL The collision of Siberia and the Kazakstan microplate with European palaeoenvironmental signatures the eastern side of the Fennoscandia continent in the Permian amalgamated the last major continental fragments to produce The Permian witnessed the fragmentation of the core of the the supercontinent Pangaea, which persisted into the Jurassic Variscan Mountains into a number of separate areas, such as the Armorican, Bohemian and Iberian massifs (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Rifts, Rivers and Climate Recovery: a New Model for the Triassic of England
    Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Proceedings of the Geologists' Association Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: Title: Rifts, rivers and climate recovery: a new model for the Triassic of England Article Type: SI: The Geology of England Keywords: Permian; Triassic; England Corresponding Author: Dr. Andrew J Newell, Corresponding Author's Institution: British Geological Survey First Author: Andrew J Newell Order of Authors: Andrew J Newell Abstract: Triassic basins of England developed under a regime of largely W-E extension and progressed from non-marine fluvial and aeolian sedimentation (Sherwood Sandstone Group), through semi-marine playa lacustrine deposits (Mercia Mudstone Group) to fully marine environments (Blue Anchor Formation and Penarth Group). A new tectono-stratigraphic model for the Sherwood Sandstone Group is proposed in which two major long-distance river systems developed under conditions of relative fault inactivity in the Early Triassic (Budleigh Salterton Pebble Beds and equivalent) and Middle Triassic (Otter Sandstone and equivalent). These are separated by a late Early Triassic syn-rift succession of fluvio- aeolian sandstones (Wildmoor and Wilmslow sandstone formations) and playa lacustrine muds (Nettlecombe Formation) which show major thickness variation and localisation with hanging wall basins. The partitioning of syn-rift deposits into mudstones in upstream basins (close to the source of water and sediment) and clean aeolian or fluvio-aeolian sandstones in downstream basins is similar to the pattern observed in the underlying Late Permian. Under conditions of rapid tectonic subsidence chains of extensional basins may become disconnected with upstream basins (Wessex Basin) acting as traps for fines and water permitting more aeolian activity in temporarily unlinked downstream basins (Worcester and Cheshire basins).
    [Show full text]
  • A Formational Framework for the Mercia Mudstone Group (Triassic) of England and Wales
    A formational framework for the Mercia Mudstone Group (Triassic) of England and Wales National Geoscience Framework Programme A S Howard, G Warrington, K Ambrose and J G Rees HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS DOCUMENT Bookmarks The main elements of the table of contents are bookmarked enabling direct links to be followed to the principal section headings and sub-headings, figures, plates and tables irrespective of which part of the document the user is viewing. In addition, the report contains links: from the principal section and subsection headings back to the contents page, from each reference to a figure, plate or table directly to the corresponding figure, plate or table, from each figure, plate or table caption to the first place that figure, plate or table is mentioned in the text and from each page number back to the contents page. RETURN TO CONTENTS PAGE British Geological Survey Research Report RR/08/04 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPOrt RR/08/04 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/ 2008. Subject index A formational framework for Geology, stratigraphy, lithostatigraphy, Mercia Mudstone Group, Triassic the Mercia Mudstone Group Front cover (Triassic) of England and Wales Red Mercia Mudstone Group is faulted against Blue Anchor Formation and Rhaetic strata, Blue Anchor, Somerset (P211340). National Geoscience Framework Programme A S Howard, G Warrington, K Ambrose and J G Rees Geographical index England and Wales Bibiographical Reference HOWARD , A S, WARRINGTON , G, AMBRO S E , K, AND REE S , J G.
    [Show full text]
  • National Geological Screening: Eastern England Region
    Y National Geological Screening: Central England region Minerals and Waste Programme Commissioned Report CR/17/091 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERALS AND WASTE PROGRAMME COMMISSIONED REPORT CR/17/091 National Geological Screening: Central England region E Hough1, D Schofield1, T Pharaoh2, R Haslam2, S Loveless3, J P Bloomfield3, J R Lee4, B Baptie4, R P Shaw5, T Bide5 and F M McEvoy 1Rock type, 2Rock structure, 3Groundwater, 4Natural processes, 5Resources Contributors/editors L P Field, R Terrington, P Williamson, I Mosca, N J P Smith, D E Evans, M Stuart, C Gent, M Barron, A Howard, G Baker, R M Lark, A Lacinska, S Thorpe, H Holbrook, I Longhurst and L Hannaford The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 7. Ordnance Survey Licence No. 100021290 EUL. Keywords National geological screening, GDF, Central England, rock type, structure, groundwater, natural processes, resources Bibliographical reference HOUGH, E, SCHOFIELD, D, PHARAOH, T, HASLAM, R, LOVELESS, S, BLOOMFIELD, J P, LEE, J R, BAPTIE, B, SHAW, R P, BIDE T AND F M MCEVOY.2018. National Geological Screening: Central England region. British Geological Survey Commissioned Report, CR/17/091. 77pp. BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh British Geological Survey offices publications only). See contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham The London Information Office also maintains a reference NG12 5GG collection of BGS publications, including maps, for Tel 0115 936 3100 consultation. We publish an annual catalogue of our maps and other BGS Central Enquiries Desk publications; this catalogue is available online or from any of Tel 0115 936 3143 the BGS shops.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geology of British Rocks and Soils - Lias Group
    Engineering Geology of British Rocks and Soils - Lias Group LAND USE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Internal Report OR/12/032 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LAND USE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME INTERNAL REPORT OR/12/032 Engineering Geology of British Rocks and Soils - Lias Group The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used P. R. N Hobbs, D. C. Entwisle, K. J. Northmore, M. G. Sumbler, with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s L. D. Jones, S. Kemp, S. Self, M. Barron, J. L. Meakin Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/2012. Contributor/editor Keywords Lias, geology, geotechnics, K. J. Northmore geohazards, mineralogy, hydrogeology, mudrocks, engineering properties. Front cover Top left – Mulgrave Shale Member at Runswick Bay, Norht Yorkshire; Top right – Lias formations at Robin Hood’s Bay, North Yorkshire; Bottom – Black Ven Marl Formation at Stonebarrow, Dorset. Bibliographical reference HOBBS, P. R. N. ET AL. 2012. Engineering Geology of British Rocks and Soils - Lias Group. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/12/032. 323pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithostratigraphy of the Sherwood Sandstone Group of England, Wales and South-West Scotland Geology and Regional Geophysics Directorate Research Report RR/14/01
    Lithostratigraphy of the Sherwood Sandstone Group of England, Wales and south-west Scotland Geology and Regional Geophysics Directorate Research Report RR/14/01 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY AND REGIONAL GEOPHYSICS DIRECTORATE RESEARCH REPORT RR/14/01 Lithostratigraphy of the Sherwood Sandstone Group of The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights England, Wales and south-west 2014. Ordnance Survey Licence No. 100021290. Scotland Keywords Report; keywords. K Ambrose, E Hough, N J P Smith, and G Warrington Front cover Chester Formation sandstone at Shepley Quarry. Sandstones high in the Chester Formation, Sherwood Sandstone Group. Medium-grained, gently cross- bedded sandstones containing occasional beds of fine conglomerate with 'Bunter' quartzite pebbles. P212558 Bibliographical reference AMBROSE, K, HOUGH, E, SMITH, N J P, AND WARRINGTON, G. 2014. Lithostratigraphy of the Sherwood Sandstone Group of England, Wales and south-west Scotland. British Geological Survey Research Report, RR/14/01. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the
    [Show full text]
  • How to Navigate This Document How to Navigate This Document
    BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT NUMBER RR/99/01 A formational framework for the Lower Jurassic of England and Wales (onshore area) B M Cox, M G Sumbler and H C Ivimey-Cook Geographical index England and Wales Subject index Geology, stratigraphy, lithostratigraphy, Lias Group, Triassic, Jurassic Bibliographical Reference Cox, B M, Sumbler, M G and Ivimey-Cook, H C. 1999. A formational framework for the Lower Jurassic of England and Wales (onshore area) British Geological Survey Research Report, RR/99/01 © NERC Copyright 1999 British Geological Survey Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG UK HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS DOCUMENT HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS DOCUMENT ❑ The general pagination is designed for hard copy use and does not correspond to PDF thumbnail pagination. ❑ The main elements of the table of contents are bookmarked enabling direct links to be followed to the principal section headings and sub-headings, figures and tables irrespective of which part of the document the user is viewing. ❑ In addition, the report contains links: ✤ from the principal section and sub-section headings back to the contents page, ✤ from each reference to a figure or table directly to the corresponding figure or table, ✤ from each figure or table caption to the first place that figure or table is mentioned in the text and ✤ from each page number back to the contents page. Return to contents page Contents 1 Summary Figures 2 Preface Figure 1a Generalised outcrop map of the Lias Group 3 Introduction in England and Wales showing the structural elements that controlled deposition 4 Stratigraphical framework Figure 1b Inferred distribution of land and sea during 4.1 Supraformational classification deposition of the Lias Group –– based on 4.2 Cleveland Basin Donovan and Howarth in Cope et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Pdf of the Gloucestershire Cotswolds LGAP Here
    GLOUCESTERSHIRE COTSWOLDS GEODIVERSITY AUDIT & LOCAL GEODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (LGAP) 2005 GLOUCESTERSHIRE COTSWOLDS GEODIVERSITY AUDIT & LOCAL GEODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (LGAP) Prepared by Gloucestershire Geoconservation Trust in partnership with: The Geology Trusts Cotswolds AONB Conservation Board IHS Energy Ltd. Principal Authors: David Owen Bill Price Claire Reid With contributions from: Hannah Evans, Nick Chidlaw, Chris Toland, and John Conway This Geodiversity Audit and Local Geodiversity Action Plan (LGAP) has been prepared by Gloucestershire Geoconservation Trust, in partnership with The Geology Trusts, Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Conservation Board and IHS Energy Ltd., with funding from the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) administered by the Minerals Industry Research Organisation (MIRO) via the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. This publication and references within it to any methodology, process, service, manufacturer or company do not constitute its endorsement by the Minerals Industry Research Organisation or the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. ISBN 1-904530-07-9 Bibliographical Reference: Owen, D., Price, W. and Reid, C. 2005. Gloucestershire Cotswolds: Geodiversity Audit & Local Geodiversity Action Plan. Gloucester: Gloucestershire Geoconservation Trust. Cover photograph: The Cotswold Escarpment Between Crickley Hill and Shurdington Hill Lists of sites in this document have been compiled from records in the Gloucestershire Geological Records Centre. Sites have been selected for their representitiveness and geological merits. Their listing implies no right of access and in all instances access must be arranged in advance with the appropriate landowner. Topographic maps are based on Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey, on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
    [Show full text]
  • 10919 Mercian Geologist
    The Triassic System in Warwickshire Jonathan D. Radley Abstract. Warwickshire’s Triassic strata are a mainly clastic Scythian-Rhaetian succession. The Sherwood Sandstone and Mercia Mudstone groups are assigned to the three structural settings of the Hinckley and Knowle Basins separated by the Coventry Horst. In the basinal areas the Sherwood Sandstone fines up from pebbly braidplain facies (Polesworth and Kidderminster Formations) into sandy braidplain and meanderplain facies (Bromsgrove Sandstone). The basal Hopwas Breccia crops out on the western margin of the Hinckley Basin. The Bromsgrove Sandstone onlaps the horst, with fossils that can be assigned to both terrestrial and aquatic habitats. The overlying Mercia Mudstone Group attests to a Mid-Late Triassic continental desert environment with windblown dust, periodic floods and ephemeral lakes. Within the Mercia Mudstone, the Arden Sandstone represents a fluvial interval with some marginal marine influences, and has yielded a mixed terrestrial-aquatic biota in the Knowle Basin. The relatively fossiliferous Penarth Group attests to Late Triassic (Rhaetian) marine transgression. Key Triassic sites are protected as SSSIs and RIGS. The central English county of Warwickshire (Fig. 1) This occurs within the Wilmcote Limestone Member occupies part of the wide outcrop of generally gently (basal Lias Group) in the Avon Valley region of dipping Triassic and Jurassic strata that runs from the southwestern Warwickshire (Old et al , 1991; Ambrose, Dorset and Devon coast in southwest England to the Yorkshire coast in the northeast. The broadly spindle- shaped Warwickshire Coalfield diversifies the regional outcrop pattern (BGS, 2001). There, the bedrock geology is dominated by an Upper Carboniferous to Lower Permian red-bed succession (Warwickshire Group), fringed in the north by Coal Measures, Millstone Grit, and older igneous and sedimentary rocks of Palaeozoic and Neoproterozoic age, as in the Nuneaton Inlier (Shotton, 1960; Hains & Horton, 1969; IGS, 1983; Bridge et al , 1998; Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Permian to Jurassic Stratigraphy and Structural Evolution of the Central Cheshire Basin
    Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 150, 1993, pp. 857-870, 11 figs. Printed in Northern Ireland The Permian to Jurassic stratigraphy and structural evolution of the central Cheshire Basin D.J. EVANS, J.G. REES & S. HOLLOWAY British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK Abstract: New seismic reflection data reveal details of the Permo-Triassic basin fill in the central Cheshire Basin. The seismic stratigraphy indicates that the Permian and Triassic succession is far thicker than previously estimated. Seismic data and backstripping of the preserved Permian to early Jurassic sedimentary succession suggest that at least two phases of fault-controlled subsidence occurred, in early Permian and early Triassic times. An intra-Triassic unconformity is seen on the seismic data near the top of the Sherwood Sandstone Group. This may equate with the Hardegsen Unconformity. It is possible that this unconformity was generated by syn-extensional regional uplift accompanying lithospheric thinning. The gross morphology and location of the faults on the eastern margin of the Cheshire Basin are interpreted to be, at least locally, controlled by extensional re-activation of a westwards-dipping reverse fault, possibly an extension of the Pontesford-Linley lineament. The Cheshire Basin is located in northwest England (Fig. 1). the zone of 'wet-rock head', causing collapse of overlying The basin was initiated in early Permian times and the strata. preserved fill comprises sedimentary rocks of Permian to Depth conversion and thickness estimates in the Early Jurassic age. These are flanked by Carboniferous and following account were calculated using the average interval Lower Palaeozoic rocks (Fig.
    [Show full text]