DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bibliography Abbot, Patrick et al. 2011. “Inclusive Fitness Theory and Eusociality.” Nature (Brief Communications Arising) 471: E1-E4. Web. Albee, Ernest. 1897. “Hume’s Ethical System.” The Philosophical Review 6(4): 337- 355. ʊ. 1896. “The Relation of Shaftesbury and Hutcheson to Utilitarianism.” The Philo- sophical Review 5(1): 24-35. Aldridge, Alfred Owen. 1946. “A Preview of Hutcheson’s Ethics.” Modern Language Notes 61(3): 153-161. Alexander, Richard. 1987. The Biology of Moral Systems. NY: Aldine de Gruyter. ʊ. 1989. “Evolution of the Human Psyche.” The Human Revolution. Chris Stringer and Paul Mellars, eds. Edinburgh: U Edinburgh P. 455-513. ʊ. 1990. How Did Humans Evolve? Reflections on the Uniquely Unique Species. Ann Arbor, MI: U Michigan. Allchin, Douglas. 2009. “The Evolution of Morality.” Evo Edu Outreach 2: 590-601. Web. Alvard, Michael S. 2003. “The Adaptive Nature of Culture.” Evolutionary Anthropol- ogy 12: 136-149. Aristotle. 1952. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. W.D. Ross. The Works of Aristotle, vol- ume II. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica. Armstrong, Paul B. 2013. How Literature Plays with the Brain: The Neuroscience of Reading and Art. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP. Aron, Elaine N. and Arthur Aron. 1997. “Sensory-Processing Sensitivity and Its Rela- tion to Introversion and Emotionality.” Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology 73(2): 345-368. Print. Austen, Jane. 1972. Northanger Abbey. 1818. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin. Austin, Michael. 2010. Introduction. Useful Fictions: Evolution, Anxiety, and the Origin of Literature. U Nebraska P. Web. Axelrod, Robert and William D. Hamilton. 1981. “The Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 211: 1390-1396. Baier, Annette. 1986. “Extending the Limits of Moral Theory.” The Journal of Phi- losophy 83(10): 538-545. ʊ. 1990. “What Emotions are About.” Philosophical Perspectives 4: 1-29. Barrett, H. Clark. 2007. “The Hominid Entry into the Cognitive Niche.” The Evolu- tion of Mind: Fundamental Questions and Controversies. Steven W. Gangestad and Jeffry A. Simpson, eds. NY: Guilford P. 241-248. Bate, Walter Jackson. 1961. From Classic to Romantic: Premises of Taste in Eight- eenth-Century England. 1946. NY: Harper and Row. Baumard, Nicolas et al. 2010. Letter. Science 329: 388-389. Web. ʊ, 2013. Jean-Baptiste André, Dan Sperber. “A Mutualistic Approach to Morality: The Evolution of Fairness by Partner Choice.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36: 59-122. Print. Baumeister, Roy F. 2005. The Cultural Animal: Human Nature, Meaning, and Social Life. Oxford: OUP. 302 Making Mind: Moral Sense and Consciousness Bechara, Antoine. 2004. “The Role of Emotion in Decision-Making: Evidence from neurobiological patients with orbitofrontal damage.” Brain and Cognition 55: 30- 40. Beck, Jeffrey M. et al. 2012. “Not Noisy, Just Wrong: The Role of Suboptimal Infer- ence in Behavioral Variability.” Neuron 74: 30-39. Web. Bell, Michael. 2000. Sentimentalism, Ethics and the Culture of Feeling. Houndmills: Palgrave. Bellamy, Liz. 1998. Commerce, Morality and the Eighteenth-Century Novel. Cam- bridge: CUP. Bennett, Maxwell and Daniel Dennett, Peter Hacker, John Searle. 2007. Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language. NY: Columbia UP. Bennett, M.R. and P.M.S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Bishop, John D. 1996. “Moral Motivation and the Development of Francis Hutche- son’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 57(2): 277-295. Blackburn, Simon. 2008. “Response to Marc Hauser’s Princeton Tanner Lecture.” www.phil.cam.ac.uk/~swb24/PAPERS/Hauser.pdf Web. Block, Ned. 2003. “Consciousness, Philosophical Issues About.” The Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Lynn Nadel, ed. NY: Natural Publishing. www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/block Web. Bloom, Paul. 2004. Descartes’ Baby: How the Science of Child Development Ex- plains What Makes Us Human. NY: Basic Books. ʊ. 2010. “The Moral Life of Babies.” The New York Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/09/magazine/09babies-t.html Web. Boehm, Christopher. 2000. “Conflict and the Evolution of Social Control.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 7(1/2): 79-101. Web. ʊ. 2012. Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame. NY: Basic Books. Boomsma, Jacobus J. et al. 2011. “Only Full-Sibling Families Evolved Eusocially.” Nature (Brief Communications Arising) 471: E4-E5. Web. Borg, Jana Schaich and Catharine Hynes, John Van Horn, Scott Grafton, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2006. “Consequences, Actions, and Intention as Factors in Moral Judgments: An fMRI Investigation.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(5): 803-817. Bouchard, Thomas J., Jr. 1994. “Genes, Environment, and Personality.” Science 264: 1700-1701. ʊ and John C. Loehlin. 2001. “Genes, Evolution, and Personality.” Behavior Genet- ics 31(3): 243-273. Boyd, Brian. 2009. On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction. Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard UP. ʊ. 2001. “The Origin of Stories.” Philosophy and Literature 25(2): 197-214. Boyd, Robert and Peter J. Richerson. 1982. “Cultural Transmission and the Evolution of Cooperative Behavior.” Human Ecology 10(3): 325-351. Bracken, Harry M. 1977-87. “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Stud- ies 11(2): 227-245. Bradbrook, Frank W. 1982. “Samuel Richardson.” From Dryden to Johnson. Boris Ford, ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 286-304. The Britannica Guide to the Brain. 2008. UK: Encyclopedia Britannica..
Recommended publications
  • Cheating the Origin, Nature, Importance and Improvement of Business And

    Cheating the Origin, Nature, Importance and Improvement of Business And

    CHEATING THE ORIGIN, NATURE, IMPORTANCE AND IMPROVEMENT OF BUSINESS AND OTHER ETHICS WALLACE R. BAKER ©2017 Wallace R. Baker Wallace R. Baker 4. HUMAN ETHICS – SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS IN UNDERSTANDING ETHICS AND EVOLUTION Charles Darwin This subject was raised by Charles Darwin when he wrote "Any animal whatever, endowed with well-marked social instincts, the parental and filial affections being included, would inevitably acquire a moral sense or conscience, as soon as its intellectual powers had become as well developed or nearly as well developed as in man"19. Konrad Lorenz Konrad Lorenz, an Austrian, who received his medical doctor degree in 1928, a PhD in Zoology in 1933 and later became a Professor of Psychology, loved and studied animals very carefully. He generated many interesting and controversial theories. In 1973 he shared a Nobel Prize in Physiology of Medicine "for discoveries in individuals and social behavior patterns" with two other important early ethologists, Nikolas Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch. In the introduction to the French version of one of his numerous books "On Aggression", it is explained that the instinct to combat its own species is necessary in natural selection but it can be harmful. He showed evolution invented mechanisms to direct this behavior into unexpectedly inoffensive channels. Lorenz leads the reader to profound thoughts. He was a controversial leader in the most important progress in the last century researching and learning about animal behavior that illuminated understanding of human behavior described by researchers and scholars later in this book20. 19 Darwin, Charles, 1982, The Descent of Man, [1871] pp.
  • The Seeds of Humanity

    The Seeds of Humanity

    The Seeds of Humanity MARC HAUSER The Tanner Lectures on Human Values Delivered at Princeton University November 12, 2008 Marc Hauser is a professor of psychology and human evolutionary bi- ology at Harvard University, where he is also director of the Cognitive Evolution Lab and codirector of the Mind, Brain, and Behavior Program. His research focuses on the evolutionary and developmental foundations of the human mind, with the specific goal of understanding which men- tal capacities are shared with other nonhuman primates and which are uniquely human. He has received numerous awards, including a Guggen- heim Fellowship in 2005. He is the author of Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think (2000), Moral Minds: How Nature Designed a Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (2006), as well as the forthcoming volume E vilicious: Why We Enjoy Being Bad. OveRALL IntRoduction Humans create plays, operas, sculptures, computers, equations, laws, re- ligions, guns, and soufflés. This is only a partial list of our achievements. In the history of life on earth, we are the only species to have created such creations. If a Martian landed on earth and had to develop a taxonomy of the living organisms, he could not be faulted for classifying the bees, birds, beavers, and baboons with the birches and baobabs, while placing humans in a group all on their own. After all, not only have baboons and baobabs never produced a soufflé, but they have never even contemplated the pos- sibility. Baobabs lack the brains, whereas baboons lack the kind of brain that has both technological savoir faire and gastronomical creativity.
  • The New York Times1 August 13, 2010 in Harvard Lab Inquiry, a Raid and a 3-Year Wait

    The New York Times1 August 13, 2010 in Harvard Lab Inquiry, a Raid and a 3-Year Wait

    The New York Times1 August 13, 2010 In Harvard Lab Inquiry, a Raid and a 3-Year Wait By NICHOLAS WADE Marc Hauser’s academic career was soaring when suddenly, three years ago, Harvard authori- ties raided his laboratory and confiscated computers and records. Dr. Hauser continued to publish and lecture widely until last week, while all the time re- searchers at Harvard and elsewhere who knew of the raid kept waiting for the other shoe to drop. In January this year, a faculty committee at last completed its report, said to contain eight charges against Dr. Hauser. But the report was kept secret and nothing changed until this month when someone showed The Boston Globe a letter about the investigation from Dr. Hauser to his faculty colleagues. Dr. Hauser’s automated e-mail reply says he is “on leave, furiously writing a book.” Dr. Hauser has been one of Harvard’s rising academic stars, with a public visibility approaching that of the psychologist Steven Pinker, whom he sometimes seemed to emulate. Dr. Hauser’s early research work was in the field of animal communication. He then started throwing his net wider. He took up new research methods for exploring babies’ thoughts and applied them to animals, showing that monkeys were capable of many cognitive feats thought unique to people. Most researchers stick to their own disciplines, but Dr. Hauser was fearless in forming col- laborations with leaders in other fields. He worked with the linguist Noam Chomsky, the brain scientist Antonio Damasio, the child psychologist Elizabeth Spelke and the primatologist Richard Wrangham.
  • Syntax Evolution: Problems and Recursion

    Syntax Evolution: Problems and Recursion

    www.ramoncasares.com 20190630 Syntax 1 Syntax Evolution: Problems and Recursion Ram´on Casares orcid: 0000-0003-4973-3128 To investigate the evolution of syntax, we need to ascertain the evo- lutionary rˆole of syntax and, before that, the very nature of syntax. Here, we will assume that syntax is computing. And then, since we are computationally Turing complete, we meet an evolutionary anomaly, the anomaly of syntax: we are syntactically too compe- tent for syntax. Assuming that problem solving is computing, and realizing that the evolutionary advantage of Turing completeness is full problem solving and not syntactic proficiency, we explain the anomaly of syntax by postulating that syntax and problem solving co-evolved in humans towards Turing completeness. Examining the requirements that full problem solving impose on language, we find firstly that semantics is not sufficient and that syntax is necessary to represent problems. Our final conclusion is that full problem solving requires a functional semantics on an infinite tree-structured syn- tax. Besides these results, the introduction of Turing completeness and problem solving to explain the evolution of syntax should help us to fit the evolution of language within the evolution of cognition, giving us some new clues to understand the elusive relation between language and thinking. Keywords: syntax evolution, problem solving, Turing completeness, recursion, language and thinking. arXiv:1508.03040v7 [cs.CL] 2 Jul 2019 This is doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4956359.v2, version 20190630. c 2017, 2019 Ram´on Casares; licensed as cc-by. Any comments on it to [email protected] are welcome. www.ramoncasares.com 20190630 Syntax 2 Syntax Evolution: Problems and Recursion §1Introduction .

  • A Critical Analysis of Moral Nativism

    The Foundations of Human Morality: A Critical Analysis of Moral Nativism by Nalini Elisa Ramlakhan A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2011 Nalini Elisa Ramlakhan Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87787-6 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87787-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.