Sensorimotor Enactivism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sensorimotor Enactivism Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2020) 19:653–684 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09647-0 A match made in heaven: predictive approaches to (an unorthodox) sensorimotor enactivism María Jimena Clavel Vázquez1,2 Published online: 20 December 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 Abstract It has been pointed out that Sensorimotor Enactivism, a theory that claims that perception is enacted and brought about by movement, says very little about the neural mechanisms that enable perception. For the proponents of the predictive approach to Sensorimotor Enactivism, this is a challenge that can be met by introducing predictive processing into the picture. However, the compatibility between these theories is not straightforward. Firstly, because they seem to differ in their stand towards representations: while Sensorimotor Enactivism is said to belong to the non-representational wing of cognitive science, predictive processing has a representational profile. And secondly, because they exhibit different explanatory strategies: while Sensorimotor Enactivism prioritizes the interactions of the embodied agent, predictive processing has internalist commitments. The aim of this paper is to address these concerns and show that a predictive approach to Sensorimotor Enactivism is viable. More specifically, I focus on the Free-Energy approach, a theory that falls within the ballpark of predictive processing. In this paper I argue for the following claims. I argue that (a) both Sensorimotor Enactivism and the Free-Energy approach may be understood for some systems in representational terms. The non-representational reading of Sensorimotor Enactivism is not mandatory and neither is the representational reading of the Free-Energy approach. (b) Sensorimotor Enactivism is, in this respect, compatible with both representa- tional and non-representational interpretations of the FEA. So, the position towards repre- sentations of these frameworks should not stand in the way of a predictive approach to Sensorimotor Enactivism. I also show that (c) the Free-Energy approach allows for an account that prioritizes the interaction of the embodied agent with the environment. This is the explanatory strategy followed by Sensorimotor Enactivism. To justify this strategy and following other proponents of Sensorimotor Enactivism, I argue that by referring to the interactions of the embodied agent a better account of the phenomena in question is provided. On this basis, I claim that (d) Sensorimotor Enactivism and the Free-Energy approach are compatible in what concerns their explanatory strategy as well. Thus, making the case for the viability of the predictive approach to Sensorimotor Enactivism. * María Jimena Clavel Vázquez [email protected] Extended author information available on the last page of the article 654 M. J. Clavel Vázquez Keywords Sensorimotor Enactivism . Predictive processing . Free-energy approach . Perception . Perceptual experience 1 Introduction From the perspective of sensorimotor enactivism (henceforth SMEn), perception is “something we do” mediated by something we know (O’Regan and Noë 2001,p. 970).1 This theory joins other enactivist proposals in understanding cognition, action, and perception as active processes that are deeply intertwined, and that should be explained by referring primarily to the agent’s bodily constitution and her interactions with the environment. Perception is, for SMEn, enacted and brought about by move- ment. It is an interactive phenomenon that is assimilated to an exploratory activity through which the agent probes the environment as it offers possibilities for action. In that sense, perception is understood, at least in part, as the process of accessing sensory information from the world as an external memory, thus opposing other views of perception, according to which this would consist in the process of constructing a model of the world. According to this theory, perception requires the possession and skilful execution of sensorimotor knowledge: an implicit and practical knowledge of the lawful ways in which sensory input changes given certain interactions between the perceiver and the object perceived. Consider, for instance, how one spontaneously squints the eyes when an image looks blurry (Noë 2004, p. 1). We do this in order to make the image appear clearer, perhaps to get a better focus. Squinting our eyes in this case suggests that we know how the image would change after doing this. SMEn claims that perception is constituted by our handle on the way sensory input system- atically changes after an interaction. SMEn is a theory of perception that aims at explaining perception from the point of view of the agent and the agent’s experience. Nonetheless, it is a naturalistic theory that is taken to be continuous with a causal account of perception. For SMEn, a theory of perception must straddle both levels, the agential and the causal (Noë 2004,pp.31–32). The causal story that is favored by SMEn is one that accounts for perception in terms of the interactions of an embodied agent with her environment.2 This might explain something that has been pointed out in the literature: SMEn says very little about the neural mechanisms that are involved in perception (Chemero 2009;Clark2009;Seth 2014, 2015; Downey 2017). It is important to consider that this lack of neuro-talk is not seen as a challenge within the framework. After all, SMEn starts from the claim that looking inside the head does not take us too far in our understanding of perceptual experience. SMEn emphatically rejects that an account of the neural mechanisms of perception is sufficient for perceptual experience. The latter is constituted by the interactions of the agent with her surroundings. 1 See Hurley (1998), O’Regan and Noë (2001), Noë (2004), O’Regan (2011). 2 The agential and the causal are continuous in the sense that the former depends on the latter: features exhibited at the agential level emerge from the complex sensorimotor interactions between the agent and the environment. Hurley (1998) illustrates this continuity with the case of a circus performer whose complex movements are both a source of and dependent upon complex dynamic feedback loops between herself and the environment. As Hurley puts it: the content of the performer’s intentions and perceptions depends on this complex causal flow (Hurley 1998,p.2). A match made in heaven: predictive approaches to (an unorthodox)... 655 Nonetheless, the theory does not deny that the brain is involved in perception. See, for instance, the following claim by Noë: “The brain has a job to do (…) a careful examination of the way experience and the brain’s activity depend on each other makes plausible the idea that the brain’s job is, in effect, to coordinate our dealings with the environment. It is thus only in the context of an animal’sembodiedexistence,situated in an environment, dynamically interacting with objects and situations, that the function of the brain can be understood” (Noë 2009, p. 65). Neural mechanisms, although not sufficient, are nevertheless necessary for perceptual experience. Furthermore, these should be understood within the wider context of the interactions of the embodied agent. So, does SMEn owe us an account of the way the brain is involved in perception? One thought might be that it does not. Surely the brain plays a role in supporting perceptual experience, but a story at the neural level does not place a strong constraint on our account of perception because perception is explained at the level of the whole organism and its interactions with the environment. Nonetheless, by claiming that the causal and the agential level are continuous, SMEn establishes a tighter link between the two levels. The causal story goes hand in hand with the story at the level of the agent’s interactions. And part of that causal story is about the neural structures that underpin perceptual experience. The causal story is not complete until some account of the role of the brain is provided. The latter seems to be the thought behind the proposals for a predictive approach to SMEn. Predictive processing3 offers an account of the neural mechanisms involved in perceptual experience that might allow SMEn to explain how the brain contributes to perceptual experience. For instance, Adrian Downey (2017) appeals to predictive processing in order to respond to the objection advanced to sensorimotor approaches to perception that claims that they are empirically vacuous, while Anil Seth (2014) appeals to predictive processing to provide, among other things, a causal story that accounts for sensorimotor knowledge. At the outset, a predictive approach to SMEn is appealing because both theories share a view of perception as an anticipatory phenomenon.4 While for SMEn, one squints the eyes expecting an image to appear more focused, predictive processing claims that the brain advances predictions about the object of perception. That said, there are at least two good reasons to think that these views are incompatible and that, in consequence, they do not belong together. Firstly, predictive processing has a representational profile that seems incom- patible with the non-representational profile that is traditionally associated with SMEn (see e.g. O’Regan and Degenaar 2014; Di Paolo et al. 2017). Secondly, SMEn’s explanatory strategy might clash with predictive processing. While predictive processing is a theory that is usually interpreted as centred around the brain, SMEn prioritizes the interactions of the embodied agent over the specification of the neural mechanisms that enable perception. 3 For a philosophical overview of predictive processing, see Clark (2016) and Hohwy (2013). In section 3 of this paper, I offer a review of the framework. 4 They are both what Bruineberg et al. (2018) call future-oriented frameworks. 656 M. J. Clavel Vázquez Importantly, as has been shown by Clark (2016, 2017b), a description of predictive processing as a neuro-centric approach is not mandatory. For him, there are some valuable lessons to be learned from developments in embodied cognition. For instance, that problem-solving can be distributed between brain, body and world (Clark 2016,p.
Recommended publications
  • Experimental Research in Urban Spatial Cognition by Using Virtual Reality Technology
    Athens Journal of Technology Engineering March 2014 Experimental Research in Urban Spatial Cognition by Using Virtual Reality Technology By Sinan Yuan Shuang Song† Yukun Zhang ‡ This paper presents a VR experiment investigating how people construct the cognitive map in mind, generate spatial memory and respond when exploring the urban environment. 76 participants were recruited to explore the virtual town of Xidi. By analyzing the traces of the participants and the data of subjective feedbacks, the research examines how the space affects people generating spatial memory and producing the corresponding behavior pattern during the exploration. Furthermore, the interaction mechanism between the urban evolution and human behavior is investigated by comparing the participants’ behavior trajectory and the real town spatial structure. Results from this research shed light on the future use of VR technology as an efficient tool in cognitive urban research.1 Introduction The development of three-dimensional (3-D) computer graphics and related technology in recent years has led to a blurring of the distinction between reality and virtual environment. This suggests the validity of virtual reality (VR) technology as a tool for urban research. VR technology, directly associated with the human sensory organs, provides urban researchers new opportunities to investigate spatial cognition, memory and behavior in urban environment. It is advanced compared with animation cognition in the sense of providing the interactivity between people and environment. It involves the subjective judgment in spatial experience and simulates the entire process of cognition in real world. By using VR technology, it is possible to examine enormous objects such as urban space experimentally and study complicated phenomena analytically.
    [Show full text]
  • Enactivism As a Fit Framework for the Study of Spatial Reasoning in Mathematics Education
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Werklund School of Education Werklund School of Education Research & Publications 2014-08 Accumulation of experience in a vast number of cases: enactivism as a fit framework for the study of spatial reasoning in mathematics education Francis, Krista; Khan, Steven; Davis, Brent Kahn, Steven et al. "Accumulation of experience in a vast number of cases: enactivism as a fit framework for the study of spatial reasoning in mathematics education." In ZDM Mathematics Education, August 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51530 journal article Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca ZDM Mathematics Education DOI 10.1007/s11858-014-0623-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Accumulation of experience in a vast number of cases: enactivism as a fit framework for the study of spatial reasoning in mathematics education Steven Khan • Krista Francis • Brent Davis Accepted: 1 August 2014 Ó FIZ Karlsruhe 2014 Abstract As we witness a push toward studying spatial movement…depends upon acquired motor-skills and reasoning as a principal component of mathematical the continuous use of common sense or background competency and instruction in the twenty first century, we know-how. …Such commonsense knowledge is dif- argue that enactivism, with its strong and explicit foci on ficult, perhaps impossible, to package into explicit, the coupling of organism and environment, action as cog- propositional knowledge – ‘‘knowledge that’’…since nition, and sensory motor coordination provides an inclu- it is largely a matter of readiness to hand or sive, expansive, apt, and fit framework. We illustrate the fit ‘‘knowledge how’’ based on the accumulation of of enactivism as a theory of learning with data from an experience in a vast number of cases.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metaphysics of Enactivism
    The metaphysics of enactivism: Realism and the egocentric profile Geoff Allen 6867138 Master thesis (History and philosophy of science) Friday 23 July 2021 First supervisor: Dr Brandt van der Gaast Second supervisor: Dr Janneke van Lith Words: 36,080 (excl. bibliography and footnotes) 1 Table of Contents 1. General introduction .................................................................................. 6 1.1. The big picture ............................................................................................ 6 1.2. In the spirit of symmetry ........................................................................... 9 1.3. Enactivism, egocentricity and realism ..................................................... 10 Block A: Enactivism and representationalism ................................ 15 2. Enactivism: A taxonomy ......................................................................... 15 2.1. Masters of movement ............................................................................... 15 2.2. Positions in the representationalism debate ............................................. 18 2.2.1. Cognitivism (pro-representationalism) ................................................ 18 2.2.2. Enactivism (anti-representationalism) ................................................. 19 2.2.3. Sidebar: How does Tiger Woods perceive the world? ........................... 21 2.2.4. A spectrum of positions ........................................................................ 24 2.3. What is representation? .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Body, Brain, and Situation in Sensorimotor Enactivism
    Body, Brain, and Situation in Sensorimotor Enactivism María Jimena Clavel Vázquez This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) at the University of St Andrews August 2020 Candidate's declaration I, María Jimena Clavel Vázquez, do hereby certify that this thesis, submitted for the degree of PhD, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for any degree. I was admitted as a research student at the University of St Andrews in September 2016. I received funding from an organisation or institution and have acknowledged the funder(s) in the full text of my thesis. October 15, 2020 Date Signature of candidate Supervisor's declaration I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. October 15, 2020 Date Signature of supervisor Permission for publication In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews we understand that we are giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. We also understand, unless exempt by an award of an embargo as requested below, that the title and the abstract will be published, and that a copy of the work may be made and I supplied to any bona fide library or research worker, that this thesis will be electronically accessible for personal or research use and that the library has the right to migrate this thesis into new electronic forms as required to ensure continued access to the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Sense of Direction and Wayfinding
    Human Sense of Direction and Wayfinding Edward H. Cornell, Autumn Sorenson, and Teresa Mio Department of Psychology, University of Alberta One of the oldest beliefs about human wayfinding is that some people have a natural ability that distinguishes them from others. In four experiments, we asked adults to rate their own sense of direction, a promising index of orientation skills despite its simplicity and reliance on self-assessment. There were small to moderate correlations between self-ratings and accuracy of pointing to imagined landmarks, accuracy of path choices during a route reversal and detour, speed at executing shortcuts, and accuracy of choices of halls within a building complex. Although we did not find consistent gender differences in actual wayfinding, effects across experiments indicate that females rated their sense of direction as worse than males. Deliberations by females may have affected the speed of some of their performances. The results suggest that self-evaluation of sense of direction is associated with evaluation of one’s familiarity with features of particular environments, as well as memories of successes and failures in recent wayfinding efforts. Key Words: orientation, spatial cognition, wayfinding. ver a century has passed since the construct of a outside. Table 1 previews the different experimental human sense of direction began to be described paradigms and predictions that groups with self-ratings of O in scientific literature (Darwin, in Romanes a good sense of direction (GSOD) are better at orienting 1883). As we shall see, having a sense of direction has been and wayfinding than groups with self-ratings of a poor associated with an ability to discriminate fine-grained sense of direction (PSOD).
    [Show full text]
  • Are Allocentric Spatial Reference Frames Compatible with Theories of Enactivism?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/170316; this version posted July 31, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism? Sabine U. Königa,*,†, Caspar Goekea,*, Tobias Meilingerb, Peter Königa,c a Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Wachsbleiche 27, 49090 Osnabrück, Germany b Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstr. 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany c Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany * shared first authorship † Corresponding author: Sabine U. König, [email protected], +49 541 969 3901 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/170316; this version posted July 31, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Theories of Enactivism propose an action-oriented approach to understand human cognition. So far, however, empirical evidence supporting these theories has been sparse. Here, we investigate whether spatial navigation based on allocentric reference frames that are independent of the observer’s physical body can be understood within an action-oriented approach. Therefore, we performed three experiments testing the knowledge of the absolute orientation of houses and streets towards north, the relative orientation of two houses and two streets, respectively, and the location of houses towards each other in a pointing task.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Cognitive Mapping by Training for People with a Poor Sense of Direction Toru Ishikawa1,2* and Yiren Zhou1
    Ishikawa and Zhou Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2020) 5:39 Cognitive Research: Principles https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00238-1 and Implications ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Improving cognitive mapping by training for people with a poor sense of direction Toru Ishikawa1,2* and Yiren Zhou1 Abstract The skill of spatial learning and orientation is fundamental in humans and differs widely among individuals. Despite its importance, however, the malleability of this skill through practice has scarcely been studied empirically, in contrast to psychometric spatial ability. Thus, this article examines the possibility of improving the accuracy of configurational understanding of the environment by training. A total of 40 adults with a poor sense of direction participated in the experiment; and were randomly assigned to either a condition in which they received feedback only or a condition in which they additionally practiced allocentric spatial updating. Participants walked one route in each session, once a week for 6 weeks, and conducted spatial tasks designed to assess their knowledge of the route. A total of 20 people with an average sense of direction also participated as a comparison group. Results showed that training in allocentric spatial updating improved the accuracy of direction estimates, although the size of the effect was limited: the improvement was not large enough to equate the performance in the groups with a poor versus average sense of direction. The two groups, however, did not differ in spatial skill in mental rotation or path integration. Feedback was effective for improving accuracy in straight-line distance estimates and sketch maps: repeated trials with feedback led to improved accuracy by the sixth session to a level comparable to the group with an average sense of direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Topic on Modeling Spatial Cognition
    Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2011) 628–631 Copyright Ó 2011 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 1756-8757 print / 1756-8765 online DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01160.x Introduction to the Topic on Modeling Spatial Cognition Glenn Gunzelmann Air Force Research Laboratory Received 10 May 2011; accepted 30 May 2011 Abstract Our ability to process spatial information is fundamental for understanding and interacting with the environment, and it pervades other components of cognitive functioning from language to mathe- matics. Moreover, technological advances have produced new capabilities that have created research opportunities and astonishing applications. In this Topic on Modeling Spatial Cognition, research crossing a variety of disciplines and methodologies is described, all focused on developing models to represent the capacities and limitations of human spatial cognition. Keywords: Spatial cognition; Cognitive model Tolman (1948) is often credited as the origin of modern psychological research on spatial cognition. In the more than six decades of empirical, neurophysiological, and computational investigation since then, tremendous progress has been made in understanding the capabili- ties and limitations of human spatial information processing. A combination of technologi- cal advancement and important practical problems has given rise to an increased focus on understanding human spatial processing in the last 15 years. For instance, astonishing new applications, like Google EarthÒ and in-car navigation devices,
    [Show full text]
  • Immersing People in Virtual Environments: Perceptual and Cognitive Considerations
    BRUCE W. HAMILL IMMERSING PEOPLE IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: PERCEPTUAL AND COGNITIVE CONSIDERATIONS In virtual environment systems, people are immersed in realistic three-dimensional computer simulations of real-world spaces for a variety of entertaining and productive purposes. The use of these systems raises fundamental questions about how to enhance the users' perceptual and cognitive performance and overcome their limitations as they interact with the technology. The focus here is on psychologically important features of the technology, considerations that affect the perceptual and cognitive quality of immersive involvement and human performance, and the kinds of tasks for which virtual environment technology might be especially beneficial. INTRODUCTION PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES Virtual environment (VE) technology is highly immer­ One of the earliest examples of virtual reality was sive, requiring the human user to become subjectively and Morton Heilig's Sensorama, an entertainment device that even spatially involved in an enveloping simulation of provided the user with a three-dimensional (3D) movie reality. The premise of VE seems to be to enhance the accompanied by appropriate sounds, odors, and even interaction between people and their systems by taking wind.8 Few, if any, of today's VE'S include effects for all advantage of the natural perceptual and cognitive abilities those senses, although they are certainly technologically of people in technologically sophisticated, realistic, sim­ feasible. In particular, virtual auditory space is an active ulated settings-virtual reality. It thus becomes very im­ area of research.9 Acoustic technology can now simulate portant to understand how people perceive and interpret 3D space through headphones, permitting 3D auditory events in their environments, both in and out of virtual localization of sounds presented in VE'S.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Spatial Cognition Theory ——The Interface of Cartography and Cognitive Science
    MAP SPATIAL COGNITION THEORY ——THE INTERFACE OF CARTOGRAPHY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE Chen Yufen Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources CAS, Beijing, 100101, PR China Email: [email protected] Abstract A map is not only a result of human spatial environment cognition, but also a tool of human spatial cognition. For many centuries, as a kind of graphic communication tool of spatial information, a map has been playing an important role in human spatial cognition. Spatial cognition is the process of spatial information processing. Spatial cognition is an important research area of cognitive science, also an emphasis issue studied by psychology, cartography, geography, computer science and Artificial Intelligence. Map spatial cognition is the process of realizing spatial cognition by using a map. As the popularization of digital mapping and Internet,one has been having more demand for and the interest in maps. An electronic map is a kind of electronic tool of map spatial cognition. GIS extends the means of human spatial cognition. Multimedia electronic map and virtual terrain environment are much more correspond with human spatial cognition, because they overcome the inherence deficiency of conventional maps. A webmap is a kind of electronic map based on Internet, and they will make more people have interest in maps. Therefore, a map as a kind of spatial cognition tool will play an important role in the condition of digital mapping. The author believes that the exploration of map as a tool of human spatial cognition and the reconsideration of relationship between human beings and maps in the condition of new technology are the heart of theoretical cartography in the 21th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Reality in Psychology
    THEMES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION Special Issue, Pages 225-252 Klidarithmos Computer Books Virtual Reality in Psychology Nigel Foreman [email protected] Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK Abstract The benefits of using virtual environments (VEs) in psychology arise from the fact that move- ments in virtual space, and accompanying perceptual changes, are treated by the brain in much the same way as those in equivalent real space. The research benefits of using VEs, in areas of psychology such as spatial learning and cognition, include interface flexibility, the reproducibility of virtual experience, and the opportunity for on-line monitoring of perform- ance. Applications of VEs are many and varied, but are especially beneficial where experience can be tailored via augmentation, and where dangerous training situations can be avoided. The use of programmable agents has great future potential in relation to training and inter- personal skill development, also perhaps in clinical diagnosis and therapy. Progress in VE us- age in psychological education is limited by cost and availability, though VEs are being used increasingly in classroom and laboratory teaching exercises. Virtual Reality was said to be “an answer waiting for a question”, but questions are being recognized, so that applications of VEs within the behavioural sciences are likely to multiply. Overview of VEs in psychology Why is VR/3-D especially significant for behavioural sciences? A technology that “… [generates] graphic environments which both produce in the users the feeling of being physically present in a virtual world and also allows them interaction in real time” (Botella, Garcia-Palacios, Quero, Banos, & Breton-Lopez, 2006) clearly has particular relevance to the study, assessment, and training of be- haviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    int. j. geographical information science, 1999, vol. 13, no. 8, 747± 774 Research Article Cognitive models of geographical space DAVID M. MARK National Center for Geographical Information and Analysis, and Department of Geography, University at Bu alo, Box o, NY 14261-0023, USA. e-mail: [email protected] alo.edu CHRISTIAN FREKSA Fachbereich Informatik, UniversitaÈ t Hamburg, Vogt-Koelln-Strasse 30, 22527 Hamburg, Germany STEPHEN C. HIRTLE School of Information Sciences, 735 IS Bldg, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA ROBERT LLOYD Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA and BARBARA TVERSKY Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA Abstract. This paper reviews research in geographical cognition that provides part of the theoretical foundation of geographical information science. Free- standing research streams in cognitive science, behavioural geography, and carto- graphy converged in the last decade or so with work on theoretical foundations for geographical information systems to produce a coherent research community that advances geographical information science, geographical information sys- tems, and the contributing ® elds and disciplines. Then, we review three high- priority research areas that are the topics for research initiatives within the NCGIA’s Project Varenius. Other topics consider but ranked less important at this time are also reviewed. 1. Introduction As geographical information becomes ubiquitous in a variety of domains and ® eld applications, computational models of geographical cognition become increas- ingly important to the growth of a science of geographical information. This paper reviews the history of research in cognition of geographical space, summarizes the current state of the ® eld, and suggests several important open issues regarding the cognitive component of geographical information science.
    [Show full text]