DOCSLIB.ORG

Indigenous Laws for Making and Maintaining Relations Against the Sovereignty of the State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indigenous Laws for Making and Maintaining Relations Against the Sovereignty of the State We All Belong: Indigenous Laws for Making and Maintaining Relations Against the Sovereignty of the State by Amar Bhatia A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Juridical Science Faculty of Law University of Toronto © Copyright by Amar Bhatia 2018 We All Belong: Indigenous Laws for Making and Maintaining Relations Against the Sovereignty of the State Amar Bhatia Doctor of Juridical Science Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2018 Abstract This dissertation proposes re-asserting Indigenous legal authority over immigration in the face of state sovereignty and ongoing colonialism. Chapter One examines the wider complex of Indigenous laws and legal traditions and their relationship to matters of “peopling” and making and maintaining relations with the land and those living on it. Chapter Two shows how the state came to displace the wealth of Indigenous legal relations described in Chapter One. I mainly focus here on the use of the historical treaties and the Indian Act to consolidate Canadian sovereignty at the direct expense of Indigenous laws and self- determination. Conventional notions of state sovereignty inevitably interrupt the revitalization of Indigenous modes of making and maintaining relations through treaties and adoption. Chapter Three brings the initial discussion about Indigenous laws and treaties together with my examination of Canadian sovereignty and its effect on Indigenous jurisdiction over peopling. I review the case of a Treaty One First Nation’s customary adoption of a precarious status migrant and the related attempt to prevent her removal from Canada on this basis. While this attempt was ii unsuccessful, I argue that an alternative approach to treaties informed by Indigenous laws would have recognized the staying power of Indigenous adoption. Notwithstanding current Canadian immigration law, this staying power would further the goals of Indigenous self-determination, decolonization, and Canadian reconciliation. The Conclusion reviews the preceding arguments and contends that state sovereignty remains a significant, but not insurmountable, barrier to Indigenous self-determination and Canadian reconciliation. Grudging legal developments and heightened societal expectations require genuine, substantive reconciliation efforts. It seems only a matter of time before Indigenous rights to extend membership and status to foreign nationals are recognized again. This dissertation makes the original contribution that the best way of doing so would be through the renewal of treaty relations informed by resurgent Indigenous laws and legal traditions. iii Acknowledgments I have left the most important part of this dissertation too late and to the very end! In terms of partially situating my scholarship, first and foremost, I am a Canadian citizen born in Ottawa to parents who immigrated to Canada from India and the Philippines. I am neither Indigenous nor do I live with precarious immigration status. Although I have been privileged with opportunities to read and learn about Indigenous laws and legal traditions, I am obviously no expert and am only beginning to understand these laws in conjunction with my greater familiarity with the Canadian state’s Aboriginal, immigration & refugee, labour & employment, and property laws. For example, I only learned much later in life that my birthplace, Ottawa, sits on unceded Algonquin territory. I also later learned that the name of the place where I live and work, Toronto, is derived from Tkaronto, which is a Mohawk or Kanienkehaka word (one of the languages of the Six Nations that make up the Haudenosaunee Confederacy). Toronto and the surrounding territories are also the traditional, treaty and current homes of the Wendat people, the Seneca Nation, the Anishinaabe people, and the Metis, with the Six Nations, the Mississaugas of New Credit and the Williams Treaty First Nations continuing to hold and assert their sovereignty, rights, title and treaties (Two Row, Dish with Spoon, Niagara) to this day. This personal history and the formal and political education that I’ve received over the years have all brought me to the questions about making and maintaining relations explored in this dissertation. As seen below, a lot of personal relationships have been made along the way. First, I would like to thank Professor White for chairing my FOE and Professor Nedelsky for serving as the internal external (and raising important questions about legitimacy in decision- making that I will carry into the publication stage). I would also like to thank the members of my supervising committee, Professor Rittich and Professor Maracle, for all of your encouragement over the long years of this dissertation. Professor Rittich: thank you again for supervising my LLM thesis and giving me the confidence to continue on with the SJD (even if I did not work quickly, I know the result here is much clearer from your efforts!). Thank you also for teaching, employing, and mentoring me over the years, including introducing me to a community of critical international law scholars (who you’ve guided in Toronto and beyond) that refuses to stop organizing things. Professor Maracle: iv thank you for teaching me in and out of your classes, for reading my scholarly and creative work, and for mentoring my friends and me to think and act on the issues raised and repeated by colonialism. Even though I know you’ve said in response to the question, “how can we help?” that you “don’t know what we’re good at”, thanks again for your firm, kind leadership and laughter that has helped so many of us to see what, in fact, we are good at. Kwas hoy for also reminding me in the defense that a title is a promise! I would like to thank my SJD supervisor, Professor Macklin, first for agreeing to supervise this dissertation so many years ago (originally with Professor Johnston) and then for sticking with me over all the years! Second, I would not be where I am today (at Osgoode and successfully defended) without your perceptive criticism and guidance over the most difficult parts of this dissertation. Thank you for insisting on clarity even as you championed the most innovative parts of this dissertation. The combination of your scholarly work with deep engagement in refugee litigation and advocacy is truly inspiring! I would also like to thank my external examiner, Professor Borrows, for reading, testing and challenging this dissertation in such a generous way. Your feedback on the need to further address the potential scale, complexity, contradictions, and constraints of Indigenous authorities over immigration and re-peopling is well-taken and I will strive to address it in future versions of this work. As seen below, your work and the work of so many others in the revitalization of Indigenous laws and wider Indigenous resurgence has been foundational in shaping my approach to transnational migration in a settler-colonial context. Chi meegwetch also for all of the inspiring work you’ve done in writing and in person to advance Indigenous law and life in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and wider Anishnaabe and Indigenous territories. The amazing hospitality you’ve shown in welcoming others to these efforts, and the work of decolonization at Neyashiinigmiing and beyond, exceeds both the English language and Canadian law. In addition to my supervising and FOE committees, I also have the deepest gratitude for my unofficial committee of Dawnis Minawaanigogiizhigok Kennedy, Shiri Pasternak, Kim Stanton, and Sujith Xavier. We’ve seen each other through a lot and I’ve learned so much along the way – I’m not sure how to thank you for what’s here and for all the other drafts and chapters that inform this work but that aren’t directly included here. So, instead, I’m just going to say sorry for all those block quotes and will thank you better in person! v The wider communities and institutions that have supported, inspired and sustained me and this work over the years include: the University of Toronto and the SSHRC and their respective funding; the OJEN; the Catalyst Fellowship at Osgoode Hall; the Toronto Group folks (including my SJD colleagues at Osgoode and U of T, like Michael, Umut, Amaya, Carolina, Claire, Patricia (Pagu), Mazen, Irina, Derek, Zoran, Gail, Howie, Rayner, Rommel, Shanthi, Mai, Charis, Stu, & Igor); the TWAIL network (including fellow Cairo organizers Usha, John, & Sujith); the Indigenous Sovereignty week organizers & speakers (including Shiri, Dawnis, Zainab, Crystal, Barb, Tannis, Corvin, Tyler, Ruth, Russ, and in memory of Randy Kapashesit and Art Manuel); the migrant worker coalition organizers (including Adrian, Anna, Carolina, Chris, Deena, Evelyn, Fay, Gabriel, Hussan, Jackie, Johnna, Kara, Nav, Senthil, Sonia, Tings, & Tzazna); the teachers and care workers at our kids’ daycares and schools over the years; the Graduate Program and other faculty at U of T law (including Julia Hall, Carla Serpe, Barbara Langlois and Professors Dyzenhaus, Brunnée, Prado, Sanderson and Valverde); and my former teachers and mentors - and now current & new colleagues - at Osgoode Hall (including Angela, Harry, Sonia, Obi, & Peer; my first-time property law colleagues (Mary Jane, Philip, Stepan, & Estair); my Aboriginal Intensive Program and Anishinaabe law camp colleagues (including Andrée & Shin; Dayna, Signa, Deb, Kent, Jeff, Lisa, Lisa, Ben, Lindsay & Heidi); my PCLS colleagues (especially Sean and Janet); and my dean, Lorne, and the Associate Deans (James, Poonam, Trevor, Mary), Faculty Association exec. members (Gus, Cynthia, Sara, Janet, Eric), and other colleagues (Obi, Carys, Doug, Hengameh, Francois, Robert, Ruth & Stephanie) who’ve all supported me as a junior faculty member)). As noted above, a lot of personal relationships have been made along the way! Many friends and family have gotten us through the years, including those in Toronto, Montreal, Ontario, New York, Vancouver, India, and the Philippines (especially Nancy & Christine; JEM is fantastic; Tantes Claire & Marie Paule; Melissa, Steve, and the boys; Charn, Neeru, and the kids; the Manila fam; the Syracuse Bhatias; KDB Uncle & family; and Aunt Nora, Uncle Alec and the dozens of cousins).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inuit Students' Experiences of Postsecondary Education
    Qallunaaliaqtut: Inuit Students’ Experiences of Postsecondary Education QALLUNAALIAQTUT: INUIT STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCES OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION IN THE SOUTH THIERRY RODON Université Laval FRANCIS LÉVESQUE Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue SHEENA KENNEDY DALSEG Carleton University ABSTRACT. The purpose of this study was to learn from the experiences of post- secondary Inuit students from Canada. Through surveys, interviews, and focus groups, we realized that despite the challenges associated with pursuing post- secondary education in the South, most respondents perceived their experience to be positive. Lack of access to sufficient and equitable funding was perceived by respondents to be a significant barrier, as was the lack of readily available information for prospective students from Inuit Nunangat. We conclude with a brief discussion of possible actions for improving access to university education in Inuit Nunangat, notably that governments should not only focus on training and should develop programs that reflect Inuit students’ needs and aspirations. QALLUNAALIAQTUT: L’EXPÉRIENCE DES ÉTUDIANTS INUITS DANS LES ÉTABLISSEMENTS POSTSECONDAIRES DU SUD RÉSUMÉ. L’objectif de cette étude est de mieux comprendre l’expérience des étu- diants inuits du Canada. Au moyen d’enquêtes, d’entrevues et de groupe focus, on constate qu’en dépit des défis importants rencontrés par ces étudiants, leur expérience est globalement positive. Les participants ont toutefois noté que le manque de financement et le manque d’information sur les études postsecon- daires étaient les obstacles les plus importants. En conclusion, on explore les actions qui permettraient d’améliorer l’accès aux études postsecondaires dans l’Inuit Nunangat, en insistant notamment sur le fait que l’on ne doit pas se concentrer uniquement sur les programmes professionnels, mais que l’on doit aussi répondre aux besoins et aspirations des étudiants inuits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allocation of Burdens in Litigation Between First Nations and the Crown Michael Wilfred Posluns
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons LLM Theses Theses and Dissertations 2014 The Allocation of Burdens in Litigation Between First Nations and the Crown Michael Wilfred Posluns Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/llm Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Posluns, Michael Wilfred, "The Allocation of Burdens in Litigation Between First Nations and the Crown" (2014). LLM Theses. 7. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/llm/7 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LLM Theses by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. The Allocation of Burdens in Litigation Between First Nations and the Crown Michael Posluns A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAW GRADUATE PROGRAM IN LAW OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL, YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO December 2013 © Michael Posluns, 2013 ABSTRACT This thesis is about two inter-related matters: first, the allocation of burdens of proof in litigation between First Nations and the Crown; and, secondly, the reaction or response of the Crown to the Court’s allocations of burdens, as evidenced in the subsequent cases. Since “burdens of proof” refers to matters of fact and evidence, I refer simply to “burdens”, emphasizing that, I mean all the burdens allocated by a Court and which the Court expects the parties to discharge in order for their case to succeed. My initial interest was in the response of the Crown to the allocation of burdens by the Court and related admonitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples and International Trade Edited by John Borrows , Risa Schwartz Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49306-2 — Indigenous Peoples and International Trade Edited by John Borrows , Risa Schwartz Frontmatter More Information indigenous peoples and international trade The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples is seen primarily as an international human rights instrument. However, the UN Declaration also encom- passes cultural, social and economic rights. Taken in the context of international trade and investment, the UN Declaration is a valuable tool to support economic self- determination of Indigenous peoples. This volume explores the emergence of Indigenous peoples’ participation in international trade and investment, as well as how it is shaping legal instruments in environment and trade, intellectual property and traditional knowledge. One theme that is explored is agency. From amicus interven- tions at the World Trade Organization to developing a future precedent for a trade and Indigenous peoples chapter, Indigenous peoples are asserting their right to participate in decision-making. The authors, who include both Indigenous and non-Indigenous experts on trade and investment, provide needed ideas and recommendations for governments, academia and policy thinkers to achieve economic reconciliation. John Borrows is the Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Law at the University of Victoria Law School in British Columbia. He is the author of numerous publications, including Resurgence and Reconciliation (2018) and Law’s Indigenous Ethics (2019). He is the 2017 Social Sciences Killam Prize winner and the 2019 Molson Prize winner. John is Anishinaabe/Ojibway and a member of the Chippewa of the Nawash First Nation in Ontario, Canada. Risa Schwartz is a sole practitioner, focusing on international law and the intersections among trade law, environmental law and Indigenous rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-12 Indigenous Rights and Increasing Access To
    Canadian Lawyers Abroad-Avocats canadiens à l’étranger 2011-2012 Student Chapter Theme Document Indigenous Rights and Increasing Access to Justice for First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples “There can be no peace or harmony unless there is justice” - Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples Table of Contents 1) CLA Annual Theme 2011-2012:.................................................................................3 2) UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.................................................4 3) Aboriginal Rights in the Canadian context..................................................................5 What are Aboriginal Rights?............................................................................................5 I. Three main categories of Aboriginal Rights:.............................................................5 a) Inherent Aboriginal Rights........................................................................................5 b) Aboriginal Title.........................................................................................................6 c) Treaty Rights.............................................................................................................6 II. Indian Act..................................................................................................................7 III. Honour of the Crown and its Implications................................................................7 IV. Duty to Consult .........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Rights in Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982
    “EXISTING” ABORIGINAL RIGHTS IN SECTION 35 OF THE CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 Richard Ogden* The Supreme Court recognises Métis rights, and Aboriginal rights in the former French colonies, without regard for their common law status. This means that “existing aboriginal rights” in section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 need not have been common law rights. The Supreme Court recognises these rights because section 35 constitutionalised the common law doctrine of Aboriginal rights, and not simply individual common law Aboriginal rights. As such, section 35 forms a new intersection between Indigenous and non-Indigenous legal systems in Canada. It is a fresh start – a reconstitutive moment – in the ongoing relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples. La Cour suprême reconnaît les droits des Métis, et les droits des peuples autochtones dans les anciennes colonies françaises, sans tenir compte de leur statut en vertu de la common law. Ceci signifie que « les droits existants ancestraux » auxquels fait référence l’article 35 de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 n’étaient pas nécessairement des droits de common law. La Cour suprême reconnaît ces droits parce que l’article 35 constitutionnalise la doctrine de common law qui porte sur les droits des peuples autochtones, plutôt que simplement certains droits particuliers des peuples autochtones, tels que reconnus par la common law. Ainsi, cet article 35 constitue une nouvelle intersection entre les systèmes juridiques indigène et non indigène au Canada. Ceci représente un départ à neuf, un moment de reconstitution de la relation qui dure maintenant depuis longtemps entre les peuples indigènes et non indigènes. * Senior Advisor, First Nation and Métis Policy and Partnerships Office, Ontario Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure; currently completing a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action in Law Schools: a Settler Harm Reduction Ap
    TOWARDS IMPLEMENTING THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION’S CALLS TO ACTION IN LAW SCHOOLS: A SETTLER HARM REDUCTION APPROACH TO RACIAL STEREOTYPING AND PREJUDICE AGAINST INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS IN CANADIAN LEGAL EDUCATION SCOTT J. FRANKS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN LAW OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO August 2020 © Scott J. Franks, 2020 Abstract Many Canadian law schools are in the process of implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Call to Actions #28 and #50. Promising initiatives include mandatory courses, Indigenous cultural competency, and Indigenous law intensives. However, processes of social categorization and racialization subordinate Indigenous peoples and their legal orders in Canadian legal education. These processes present a barrier to the implementation of the Calls. To ethically and respectfully implement these Calls, faculty and administration must reduce racial stereotyping and prejudice against Indigenous peoples and Indigenous legal orders in legal education. I propose that social psychology on racial prejudice and stereotyping may offer non- Indigenous faculty and administration a familiar framework to reduce the harm caused by settler beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors to Indigenous students, professors, and staff, and to Indigenous legal orders. Although social psychology may offer a starting point for settler harm reduction, its application must remain critically oriented towards decolonization. ii Acknowledgments I have a lot of people to acknowledge. This thesis is very much a statement of who I am right now and how that sense of self has been shaped by others.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Perspectives Collection Bora Laskin Law Library
    fintFenvir Indigenous Perspectives Collection Bora Laskin Law Library 2009-2019 B O R A L A S K I N L A W L IBRARY , U NIVERSITY OF T O R O N T O F A C U L T Y O F L A W 21 things you may not know about the Indian Act / Bob Joseph KE7709.2 .J67 2018. Course Reserves More Information Aboriginal law / Thomas Isaac. KE7709 .I823 2016 More Information The... annotated Indian Act and aboriginal constitutional provisions. KE7704.5 .A66 Most Recent in Course Reserves More Information Aboriginal autonomy and development in northern Quebec and Labrador / Colin H. Scott, [editor]. E78 .C2 A24 2001 More Information Aboriginal business : alliances in a remote Australian town / Kimberly Christen. GN667 .N6 C47 2009 More Information Aboriginal Canada revisited / Kerstin Knopf, editor. E78 .C2 A2422 2008 More Information Aboriginal child welfare, self-government and the rights of indigenous children : protecting the vulnerable under international law / by Sonia Harris-Short. K3248 .C55 H37 2012 More Information Aboriginal conditions : research as a foundation for public policy / edited by Jerry P. White, Paul S. Maxim, and Dan Beavon. E78 .C2 A2425 2003 More Information Aboriginal customary law : a source of common law title to land / Ulla Secher. KU659 .S43 2014 More Information Aboriginal education : current crisis and future alternatives / edited by Jerry P. White ... [et al.]. E96.2 .A24 2009 More Information Aboriginal education : fulfilling the promise / edited by Marlene Brant Castellano, Lynne Davis, and Louise Lahache. E96.2 .A25 2000 More Information Aboriginal health : a constitutional rights analysis / Yvonne Boyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Haudenosaunee Leaders Travel to Netherlands to Mark Two Row Wampum Treaty
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – September 12, 2013 For More Information Andy Mager, Two Row Wampum Renewal Campaign, 315-701-1592 (office), 315-559-7058 (cell) Haudenosaunee Leaders Travel to Netherlands to Mark Two Row Wampum Treaty On Friday, September 13, 2013, Haudenosaunee leaders will participate in a ceremony to honor the 400 year old Two Row Wampum Treaty between the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and The Netherlands. The ceremony will be held at the Tree of Peace which was planted by the late Mohawk elder Jake Swamp at Wijkpark Transvaal in The Hague, The Netherlands, in September 2006. The Netherlands Coalition for Indigenous Peoples has organized the event as part of their annual efforts to strengthen the implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The Dutch Ambassador for Human Rights, Mr. Lionel Veer will represent The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the ceremony which follows up on the welcome of the Two Row Symbolic Enactment to New York City by the Dutch Consul General Rob deVos on August 9. In New York City, Mr. deVos renewed the 400 year old friendship between his nation and the Haudenosaunee, noting “The Dutch people could not have survived, could not have lived here, without your help. We can learn so much from you.” Onondaga Faithkeeper and international indigenous leader Oren Lyons, Mohawk educator and activist Kenneth Deer and Mohawk Elder Joe Deom, Chairman of the Board of the KANIEN'KEHÁ:KA ONKWAWÉN:NA RAOTITIÓHKWA Cultural Center, will travel to the Netherlands on Haudenosaunee passports, part of an ongoing assertion of sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Relationships Between the Canadian and American Governments and First Nation Peoples
    Tina Dion Treaty Relationships Between the Canadian and American Governments and First Nation Peoples Research Paper for the National Centre for First Nations Governance May, 2008 I. INTRODUCTION This paper is intended to provide First Nations with a comparative overview of treaty relationships between the Canadian and American governments and First Nation peoples. From this historic treaty relationship, legal principles have been developed which give effect to Treaty rights. Modern day Treaty rights are framed, in part, by virtue of the historical and legal authority of governments in Canada and in the United States during the treaty-making period. One large component of modern day Treaty law is the concept of fiduciary duty; that is, where the government has a legal duty to do what is in the best interests of the First Nation. Canadian law as it relates to the Crown’s fiduciary obligations toward First Nations, in some measure, rests on an understanding of American law. There are two major components to this paper. In the first part, American and Canadian approaches to treaty making, including the development of Indian policy, will be examined. The second part of this paper will examine the comparative historical governmental authority and legal justification in respect of Indian nations and their lands. This paper will conclude with a brief discussion of how fiduciary duty legal principles may affect Treaty First Nations and their rights. II. UNITED STATES AND CANADA: AN OVERVIEW Americans entered into many more historical treaties than did the Canadian government. For example, between 1848 and 1867, the United States government signed over 100 treaties with various Indian tribes.1 Early in the colonial process, it was the objective of each of the developing nations to foster relationships and secure Indian lands for incoming European settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Conflict and the Development of Canadian Aboriginal Law
    The University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review Volume 19 Article 5 1-12-2017 Constitutional Conflict and the Development of Canadian Aboriginal Law Guy Charlton Auckland University of Technology, [email protected] Xiang Gao The Eastern Institute of Technology, Auckland, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/undalr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Charlton, Guy and Gao, Xiang (2017) "Constitutional Conflict and the Development of Canadian Aboriginal Law," The University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review: Vol. 19 , Article 5. Available at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/undalr/vol19/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in The nivU ersity of Notre Dame Australia Law Review by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICT AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CANADIAN ABORIGINAL LAW GUY C CHARLTON* AND XIANG GAO** ABSTRACT This paper argues that aboriginal rights in Canada have been greatly affected by 19th century governmental and social conflicts within the Canadian colonial state. These conflicts, largely over the ownership of land and regulatory authority between the federal government and the provinces necessarily impacted the First Nations on the ground while affecting how their legal claims were recognized and implemented. In particular they impacted the legal efficacy of treaty rights, the scope of rights recognised by the courts and an expansive legally protected notion of indigenous sovereignty. As a result, the rights now protected under sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Row Wampum Treaty Iroquois
    Two Row Wampum Treaty Iroquois Long-distance and venomed Everett never pontificating loud when Andre disenfranchising his deviances. Unattainted and inebriated Wilber stutter his backsliders pegh agonized debatingly. Finno-Ugrian and peptic Otis impersonalise so secretly that Sergei rule his petcocks. But more people to iroquois wampum treaty As long as the Sun shines upon this Earth, Poughkeepsie, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Iberian intervention and the presence of centralized political orders among Indigenous peoples, it was said that a meeting would not be in session during the night time hours because arguments were more prevalent during that time. It explains how to coexist together in peace and friendship, provinces and territories have legislated authority for health, and which would form the record of the agreement. Everyday we feature an amazing new website built with Wix. Your question closely resembles an assignment with multiple questions. It consists of two outer strands that are twisted together to represent laws of peace, part of the Iroquois Confederacy. Get the latest living and leisure news, an EPA superfund site, pp. He wanted the confederacy to know that they were still united. Learn more about Disqus on rabble. Although conquest and treaty forced them to cede much of their land, the Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee would exchange wampum belts as a peace symbol after a period of war. Support us on Patreon! Native people during this period resulted in the formulation of principles to regulate the allocation of land, not a single battle has been fought, in weaving these three Wampum Belts I relied upon descriptions and sketches found in the historic literature.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Partial Histories: Constituting a Conflict between Women's Equality Rights and Indigenous Sovereignty in Canada Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/59c8k7c0 Author Painter, Genevieve Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Partial Histories: Constituting a Conflict between Women's Equality Rights and Indigenous Sovereignty in Canada by Genevieve Painter A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge Professor Calvin K. Morrill, Chair Professor Leti P. Volpp Professor Marianne Constable Fall 2015 Abstract Partial Histories: Constituting a Conflict between Women's Equality Rights and Indigenous Sovereignty in Canada by Genevieve Painter Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Calvin K. Morrill, Chair This dissertation is a history of an idea, a retelling of a simple story about an idea as a complicated one, and an explanation of the effects of believing the simple story. From 1869 to 1985, to be an Indian in the eyes of the Canadian state – to be a “status Indian” – a person had to have a status Indian father. The Canadian government registered a population of Indigenous people as status Indians and decided that Indian status passed along the male line. If an Indian man married a non-Indian woman, his wife gained status and their children were status Indians. In contrast, if a status Indian woman married a non-Indian man, she lost her Indian status, and her children were not status Indians.
    [Show full text]