DOCSLIB.ORG

Use and Management of Protected Areas in Ethiopia: Multiple Stakeholder Analysis of Sustainable Resource Management at Awash National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Use and Management of Protected Areas in Ethiopia: Multiple Stakeholder Analysis of Sustainable Resource Management at Awash National Park USE AND MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS IN ETHIOPIA: MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AT AWASH NATIONAL PARK By Solomon Abebe Belay Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Environmental Science) University of South Africa (UNISA) Supervisor: Dr Aklilu Amsalu (April 2014) i Awash Narional Park Declaration I, Solomon Abebe Belay, declare that “Use and Management of Protected Areas in Ethiopia: Multiple Stackholders Analysis of Sustainable Resource Management at Awash National Park” is my own work and that all the sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references.. _________________________ _____________________ Belay A Solomon Date ii Acknowledgment I wish to acknowledge the following for their invaluable contribution towards my success in the production of this thesis. My heartfelt gratitude goes to Dr Aklilu Amsalu, my supervisor for his support and dedication in guiding me throughout the entire period. This thesis would not have reaches completion without the endless support, advice and encouragement of Dr. Eyualem Abebe and his family. Most importantly I would like to thank all my family and friends especially my children Robel and Saron, who missed out the most during my study leave. I would like to thank the Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority for allowing me to work and move freely in the Park. A very special thanks goes to staff members of Awash National Park for their technical support during data gathering and for providing me with information I requested. I am also indebted to the field work enumerators, GIS expertise, the research participants and the resource persons. I thank Jigjiga University (JJU) for their financial support and study leave. All staff members of University of South Africa whom I communicated with and those in Akaki Campus, Addis Ababa, showed dedication in their response to my incessant requests and questions; their support is gratefully acknowledged. Last but not least, I thank my friends Desalegn Ayal and Demesse Meshesha for their encouragement and support. iii Abstract In response to recent decentralization in Ethiopia, we investigated the status of and pressure exerted on Awash National Park (ANP), vis-a- vis Park resources, observed land use and land cover changes, causes of park-related conflicts, use and management role of stakeholders at federal, regional and local level and the impact of policy on sustainable resources conservation through a comparative framework of before (pre-1995) and after decentralization (post-1995). We used a combination of two black and white aerial photographs of 1975 and 1986, a satellite image of 2006, field observation, information from local communities and Geographic Information System (GIS) to generate the land use and land cover profile. We selected a total of 210 respondents by stratified random sampling, and group discussion participants and key informants using the purposive sampling technique. Direct observed participation of stakeholders, household questionnaire, and interview with key informants and focus group discussions were used to collect data. Our results showed a declining scattered bushland by a rate of 20.61km2 per year between 1972 and 1986. On the other hand, Shrub encroachment increased by 32.2 % between 1972 and 1986 and by 10.3 % (77.4 km2) during the entire study period. Grassland was the largest cover type in the area between 1986 and 2006 and expanded by 14.2 % (106.4 km2) between 1972 and 1986. The majority of respondents highlighted that the most important drivers of the observed LULC changes pre-1995 were the combined effects of the land reform policy and changes in Park boundary (size of the Park). Population growth was reported to be the main driving factor for LULC change pre-and post-1995. The continuing existence of the area as a national Park receives unreserved support from most pastoral and agro-pastoral communities. From the data we conclude that overall, decentralization in Ethiopia was not effective in terms of improving the status of Awash National Park. We recommend action should be taken in terms of reducing human and livestock pressure and to prevent and solve interest-based conflicts between stakeholder Key terms: iv Awash National Park, Decentralization, Ethiopia, Ethnic conflict, land use change, National parks, Pastoralist, Resource use and management, Stakeholders analysis, Sustainable resource. v Table of Contents Declaration ...................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgment ........................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................... iv List of Table .................................................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................. x List of Appendences ........................................................................................................................................ x List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Objectives of the Study ......................................................................................................................... 16 1.3 Research Questions .............................................................................................................................. 17 1.4 Significance of the Study ....................................................................................................................... 18 1.5 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER TWO .............................................................................................................................................. 19 Theoretical Context and Understanding ....................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Theoretical Context ............................................................................................................................... 19 2.1.1 The concept of Sustainable Resource Management ................................................................... 20 2.1.2 Political Ecology Approach ........................................................................................................... 21 2.1.3 Stakeholders Approach ................................................................................................................ 23 CHAPTER THREE ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 25 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 The study area ....................................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................ 26 3.3.2. Biophysical resources .................................................................................................................. 26 3.3.3 Human Population and Livestock ................................................................................................ 31 3.3.4 Sources of family income ............................................................................................................. 35 3.3.5 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................... 36 vi ` 3.6 Uniqueness of ANP.................................................................................................................. 37 3.3.7 Other Conservation areas ............................................................................................................ 37 3.5 Materials and Methods ......................................................................................................................... 38 3.5.1 Land use and land cover change .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti
    Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DER GRADES DES DOKTORS DER PHILOSOPHIE DER UNIVERSTÄT HAMBURG VORGELEGT VON YASIN MOHAMMED YASIN from Assab, Ethiopia HAMBURG 2010 ii Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti by Yasin Mohammed Yasin Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (POLITICAL SCIENCE) in the FACULITY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES at the UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG Supervisors Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff HAMBURG 15 December 2010 iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my doctoral fathers Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit and Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff for their critical comments and kindly encouragement that made it possible for me to complete this PhD project. Particularly, Prof. Jakobeit’s invaluable assistance whenever I needed and his academic follow-up enabled me to carry out the work successfully. I therefore ask Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit to accept my sincere thanks. I am also grateful to Prof. Dr. Klaus Mummenhoff and the association, Verein zur Förderung äthiopischer Schüler und Studenten e. V., Osnabruck , for the enthusiastic morale and financial support offered to me in my stay in Hamburg as well as during routine travels between Addis and Hamburg. I also owe much to Dr. Wolbert Smidt for his friendly and academic guidance throughout the research and writing of this dissertation. Special thanks are reserved to the Department of Social Sciences at the University of Hamburg and the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) that provided me comfortable environment during my research work in Hamburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Awash National Park, Ethiopia: Impact of Decentralization on the Use and Management of Resources
    Open Journal of Ecology, 2014, 4, 950-960 Published Online November 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/oje http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.415079 Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Awash National Park, Ethiopia: Impact of Decentralization on the Use and Management of Resources Solomon Belay1, Aklilu Amsalu2, Eyualem Abebe3* 1Department of Geography, Jigjiga University, Jijiga, Ethiopia 2Department of Geography, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 3Department of Natural Science, Elizabeth City State University, Elizabeth City, USA Email: *[email protected] Received 26 September 2014; revised 25 October 2014; accepted 30 October 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract We analyzed the magnitude of land use land cover changes and identified drivers of those changes at Awash National Park, Ethiopia, using aerial photographs, satellite images and field observation. Scattered bushland—the most important habitat for the wild animals, declined drastically. Areas under grassland, farmland or open land increased over the study period. Policy and park border demarcation issues were identified as drivers of change before 1995 (before decentralization), whereas livestock grazing was indicated to be the leading driver of change after 1995. Major events and causes that largely explained these changes include immigration of the Ittu community, land tenure system, drought, poaching, use policy issues and regional economic and infrastructur- al development. Our study reveals that the sustainability of the park calls for an immediate action to reduce the ever increasing human and livestock pressure on park resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Pressure Threaten Swayne's Hartebeest to Point of Local
    Research Article Volume 8:1,2020 Journal of Biodiversity and Endangered DOI: 10.24105/2332-2543.2020.8.239 Species ISSN: 2332-2543 Open Access Human Pressure Threaten Swayne’s Hartebeest to Point of Local Extinction from the Savannah Plains of Nech Sar National Park, South Rift Valley, Ethiopia Simon Shibru1*, Karen Vancampenhout2, Jozef Deckers2 and Herwig Leirs3 1Department of Biology, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium 3Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerpen, Belgium Abstract We investigated the population size of the endemic and endangered Swayne’s Hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus swaynei) in Nech Sar National Park from 2012 to 2014 and document the major threats why the species is on the verge of local extinction. The park was once known for its abundant density of Swayne’s Hartebeest. We used direct total count methods for the census. We administered semi-structured interviews and open-ended questionnaires with senior scouts who are a member of the local communities. Historical records were obtained to evaluate the population trends of the animals since 1974. The density of the animal decreased from 65 in 1974 to 1 individual per 100 km2 in 2014 with a decline of 98.5% in the past 40 years. The respondents agreed that the conservation status of the park was in its worst condition ever now with only 2 Swayne’s Hartebeest left, with a rapid decline from 4 individuals in 2012 and 12 individuals in 2009. Mainly hunting and habitat loss, but also unsuitable season of reproduction and shortage of forage as minor factors were identified as threats for the local extinction of the Swayne’s Hartebeests.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Responses to Drought in Fentale Pastoral Woreda of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
    Household Responses to Drought in Fentale Pastoral Woreda of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Abera Bekele Department of Development Studies Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia Aklilu Amsalu Associate Professor of Development Studies Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia ABSTRACT Fentale pastoralists have been undertaking a set of responses to mitigate the adverse effects of the present day severe recurrent drought on the livelihood sources of the households. This study was conducted to investigate responses that are undertaken to drought by households in Fentale pastoral Woreda of Oromia Regional State in Ethiopia. A household survey was conducted with 134 households complemented by interviews with informants and with in-depth focus group discussion. The results indicate that households have developed various response mechanisms to deal with the challenges of the severe droughts through pastoral and non pastoral activities. An extent of household responses towards both pastoral and non pastoral activities are varied, in which the household characteristics, specifically, wealth in terms of livestock holding is the decisive factors for the engagement of the household in any one or more of a set of productive activities/response mechanisms. The extent of households' mobility and herd diversification has increased. In addition, households have started to partly practice crop cultivation. Other non-pastoral activities such as agriculture, daily labour, petty trade, fuel wood collection and charcoal selling contributed to about 35% of the total household income. Keywords: Climate change, Drought, pastoral, agro-pastoral, Fentale Woreda INTRODUCTION Pastoralism is a rational, adaptable, tried and tested animal production system uniquely suited to the dry lands. Pastoralism occupies a quarter of the world area, which is predominantly arid and semi-arid.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan of Babile Elephant Sanctuary
    BABILE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN December, 2010 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Wildlife for Sustainable Authority (EWCA) Development (WSD) Citation - EWCA and WSD (2010) Management Plan of Babile Elephant Sanctuary. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 216pp. Acronyms AfESG - African Elephant Specialist Group BCZ - Biodiversity Conservation Zone BES - Babile Elephant Sanctuary BPR - Business Processes Reengineering CBD - Convention on Biological Diversity CBEM - Community Based Ecological Monitoring CBOs - Community Based Organizations CHA - Controlled Hunting Area CITES - Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora CMS - Convention on Migratory Species CSA - Central Statistics Agency CSE - Conservation Strategy of Ethiopia CUZ - Community Use Zone DAs - Development Agents DSE - German Foundation for International Development EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EPA - Environmental Protection Authority EWA - Ethiopian Wildlife Association EWCA - Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority EWCO - Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Organization EWNHS - Ethiopian Wildlife and Natural History Society FfE - Forum for Environment GDP - Gross Domestic Product GIS - Geographic Information System ii GPS - Global Positioning System HEC – Human-Elephant Conflict HQ - Headquarters HWC - Human-Wildlife Conflict IBC - Institute of Biodiversity Conservation IRUZ - Integrated Resource Use Zone IUCN - International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources KEAs - Key Ecological Targets
    [Show full text]
  • Willingness-To-Pay for Protecting Endangered Environments
    Willingness-To-Pay for Protecting Endangered Environments Table of Contents SSRR No. 31 1. INTRODUCTION 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 3. RESEARCH DESIGN 4. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS References WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY FOR PROTECTING ENDANGERED ENVIRONMENTS The Case of Nechsar National Park Zewdu Belete Yemesrach Assefa Abstract: Although national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and reserves are established to conserve biodiversity and enhance eco-tourism, most of the country’s protected areas are under serious threat. The local threats usually arise from human encroachment. To rescue these resources, appropriate conservation strategy must be put in place. This, however, requires proper valuation of the environment. Taking Netchsar National Park as a case, it was tried to measure people’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) to protect the endangered environment and identify its determinants. Using dichotomous choice contingent valuation method (CVM), it was found that the local community is willing to protect the park. The result shows that the means for the WTP are Birr 28.34 and Birr 57.07 per year per household; and its determinants are primary economic activity of the households, dependency ratio and distance from the park. The study suggests that the park management should involve the local community in its conservation endeavour and share the benefits with them. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Environmental degradation may jeopardize economic development of the world. Rapid population growth, urbanization, increased production and consumption, intensification of agriculture and acceleration of landscape transformation have put serious pressure on the environment. This, inter alia, brings environmental protection into the development agenda. According to World Development Report (World Bank 1992), environmental damage can hamper development in two ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Afar: Insecurity and Delayed Rains Threaten Livestock and People
    EMERGENCIES UNIT FOR UNITED NATIONS ETHIOPIA (UN-EUE) Afar: insecurity and delayed rains threaten livestock and people Assessment Mission: 29 May – 8 June 2002 François Piguet, Field Officer, UN-Emergencies Unit for Ethiopia 1 Introduction and background 1.1 Animals are now dying The Objectives of the mission were to assess the situation in the Afar Region following recent clashes between Afar and Issa and Oromo pastoralists, and focus on security and livestock movement restrictions, wate r and environmental issues, the marketing of livestock as well as “chronic” humanitarian issues. Special attention has been given to all southern parts of Afar region affected by recent ethnic conflicts and erratic small rains, which initiated early pastoralists movements in zone 3 & 5. The assessment also took into account various food security issues, including milk availability while also looking at limited water resources in Eli Daar woreda (Zone 1), where particularly remote kebeles1 suffer from water shortage. High concentrations of animals have been noticed in several locations of Afar region during the current dry season. The most important reason for the present humanitarian emergency crisis in parts of Afar Region and surroundings are the various ethnic conflicts among the Issa, the Kereyu, the Afar and the Ittu. These Dead camel in Doho, Awash-Fantale (photo Francois Piguet conflicts forced pastoralists to change UN-EUE, July 2002 their usual migration patterns and most importantly were denied access to either traditional water points and wells or grazing areas or both together. On top of this rather complex and confuse conflict situation, rains have now been delayed by more than two weeks most likely all over Afar Region and is now causing livestock deaths.
    [Show full text]
  • National Action Plan for the Conservation of Cheetah and African Wild Dog in Ethiopia
    NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OF CHEETAH AND AFRICAN WILD DOG IN ETHIOPIA March 2012 Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OF CHEETAH AND AFRICAN WILD DOG IN ETHIOPIA Copyright : Ethiopia Wildlife Conservation Authority (EWCA) Citation : EWCA, 2012, National Action Plan for the Conservation of Cheetahs and African Wild Dogs in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Reproduction of this publication for educational, conservation and other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged Reproduction of this publication for sale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder Preface It is with great satisfaction that I hereby endorse the Cheetah and Wild Dog Conservation Action Plan on behalf of the Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority. The recommendations and policy directions described in this plan will be guiding our work for the coming five years, because we believe that they represent best practice and will promote persistence of the cheetah and wild dog in Ethiopia. The cheetah and wild dog are emblematic species for Ethiopia. Our wildlife assemblage would not be complete without them; indeed our biodiversity would not be complete without these flagship species. Of course this comes at a cost: we must mitigate conflict with farmers and maintain wild landscapes with sufficient prey base. We acknowledge the assistance of national and international partners in organising the workshop that created consensus on the issues and in drafting the Cheetah and Wild Dog Conservation Action Plan. We count on the collaboration of those partners, and other stakeholders, in the implementation of this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement and Local Livelihoods in Nechsar National Park, Southern Ethiopia
    Resettlement and Local Livelihoods in Nechsar National Park, Southern Ethiopia Abiyot Negera Biressu Thesis Submitted for the Degree: Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies Faculty of Social Science, University of Tromsø Norway, Spring 2009 Resettlement and Local Livelihoods in Nechsar National Park, Southern Ethiopia By: Abiyot Negera Biressu Thesis Submitted for the Degree: Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tromsø Norway Tromso, Spring 2009 Acknowledgement I would like to thank people and institutions that provided me with the necessary support for my education in Tromsø and during the production of this thesis. I am very much thankful to the Norwegian State Educational Loan Fund (Lånnekassen) for financing my education here at the University of Tromsø. My gratitude also goes to Center for Sámi Studies for financing my fieldwork. I would like to say, thank you, to my supervisor Ivar Bjørklund (Associate Professor) for his comments during the writing of this thesis. My friends (Ashenafi, Eba and Tariku), whose encouraging words are always a click away from me, also deserve special thanks. I am also indebted to my informants and Nechsar National Park Administration for their cooperation during the field work. i Table of Contents Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………………………...i Acronyms……………………………………………………………………………………………………v List of Maps………………………………………………………………...………………………………vi Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………….vii Chapter One: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………...........1 1.1. Introduction to the Place and People of Study Area…………………………………………………….1 1.2. Research Frame………………………………………………………………………………………….2 1.3. Objective and Significance of the Study………………………………………………………………...5 1.4. Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………….5 1.4.1. From Park Management to Guji Community…………………………………………………………5 1.4.2. Oral Interview…………………………………………………………………………………………7 1.4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance to a Hunting Ban in Nechisar National Park of Southern Ethiopia
    SCIREA Journal of Environment http://www.scirea.org/journal/Environmental December 23, 2020 Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2020 Asymmetric Power Relations on The Frontiers of The State: Resistance to a Hunting Ban in Nechisar National Park of Southern Ethiopia Bayisa Feye Bedane Arba Minch University, Ethiopia Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper concerns the ethnographic analysis of asymmetrical power relations created between actors holding competing views about nature conservation and preservation of cultural values in one of the highly conflict-affected protected areas in Ethiopia. The rhetoric of wilderness and the policies it implies were exported to Ethiopia to create protected areas in the 1960s. Since then, though resisted, it has been strengthened through conditional funding and technical supports by conservation NGOs of the global north. Taking the case of a hunting ban introduced through the creation of Nechisar National Park in southern Ethiopia, it is found that the top-down formation of the park and imposed hunting prohibitions have resulted in altering local values, targeted attacks and elimination of protected animals such as the Swayne’s hartebeest which the park was created to protect. A historical ethnographic approach was adopted from 2016 to 2018 to collect data alongside archival analysis, in-depth individual and group interviews, case appraisals, and observations. 1 Keywords: Imposed values, Nechisar park, power relations, resistance, hunting, dual impact. 1. Introduction Many protected areas in Africa are facing a doomed future as a result of their widespread rejection by local communities claiming various rights to the curtailed resources (Wells, and McShane 2004; Berkes, 2002; Infield, 2001).
    [Show full text]