Plant Press, Vol. 22, No. 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plant Press, Vol. 22, No. 4 THE PLANT PRESS Department of Botany & the U.S. National Herbarium New Series - Vol. 22 - No. 4 October-November 2019 Parasitic plants: Important components of biodiversity By Marcos A. Caraballo-Ortiz arasitic organisms are generally viewed in a negative way itats. Only a few parasitic plants yield economically impor- because of their ability to “steal” resources. However, tant products such as the sandalwood, obtained from the Pthey are biologically interesting because their depend- tropical shrub Santalum album (order Santalales). Other pro- ency on hosts for survival have influenced their behavior, mor- ducts are local and include traditional medicines, food, and phology, and genomes. Parasites vary in their degree of crafts like “wood roses”. Many parasites are also considered necessity from a host, ranging from being partially independent agricultural pests as they can impact crops and timber plan- (hemiparasitic) to being complete dependent (holoparasitic). tations. Some parasites can live independently, but if they find potential It is difficult to describe a typical parasitic plant because hosts, they can use them to supplement their nutritional needs they possess a wide diversity of growth habits such as trees, (facultative parasitism). terrestrial or aerial shrubs, vines, and herbs. The largest Parasitism is not a phenomenon unique to animals, as there Continued on page 2 are plants parasitic to other plants. Current biodiversity esti- mates indicate that approximately 4,700 species of flowering Tropical mistletoes are very plants are parasitic, which account for about 1.2% of the total inferred number of plant species in the world. About half of the diverse but still poorly known. known species of parasitic plants belong to a single order, San- Herbaria house many unidentified talales, which is diverse and mainly composed of hemiparasites. However, parasitism has evolved independently in 11 lineages and misidentified specimens. of angiosperms comprising 27 families, some of them small and consisting of only one species. Parasitic plants have been able to Marcos A. Caraballo-Ortiz, colonize almost every corner of the world (except the polar re- Smithsonian Botanist gions), and many are common in lowlands and disturbed hab- Department of Botany & the U.S. National Herbarium Mistletoes Orders and families containing parasitic flowering plants, with estimated numbers Continued from page 1 of genera and species. Names within quotes include taxa not properly recognized yet by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181:1–20; 2016). known parasitic plant is the tree Okoubaka Estimates obtained and adapted from “The Parasitic Plant Connection” website by aubrevielli (order Santalales) from tropical Daniel Nickrent (2019; https://parasiticplants.siu.edu). Africa, which can reach up to 40 m tall and parasitize many species of trees, ap- Order Families Parasitic Genera Parasitic Species parently killing the closest neighbors to minimize competition for light. The small- Boraginales Lennoaceae 2 4 est parasite is likely the miniature mistle- toe Viscum minimum (also in order Cucurbitales Apodanthaceae 2 10 Santalales), whose tiny stems and inflores- cences measure up to 3 mm long and in Ericales Mitrastemonaceae 1 (Mitrastemon) 2 nature, only grows on two species of spurges (Euphorbia horrida and E. polyg- Lamiales Orobanchaceae 100 2,100 ona, Euphorbiaceae) from South Africa. It is notable that the largest flower in the Laurales Lauraceae 1 (Cassytha) 20 world, the corpse lily (Rafflesia arnoldii, Rafflesiaceae), is a parasite that grows -em Malpighiales Rafflesiaceae 3 35 bedded into the stems of a woody vine Malvales Cytinaceae 2 12 (Tetrastigma spp., Vitaceae) in the rainfor- ests of Sumatra. Many other parasitic Piperales “Hydnoraceae” 2 12 plants grow as vines such as dodders (Cus- cuta spp., Convolvulaceae) and the laurel Santalales 16 “Families” 166 2,284 dodder (Cassytha spp., Lauraceae), which form dense masses of twining yellowish Saxifragales Cynomoriaceae 1 (Cynomorium) 1 stems wrapping their hosts. Terrestrial par- asites like broomrapes (Striga spp., Oro- Solanales Convolvulaceae 1 (Cuscuta) 215 banchaceae) are known for their capacity to affect or even destroy agricultural crops Zygophyllales Krameriaceae 1 (Krameria) 23 such as rice, maize, sugarcane, and sorg- hum. Some parasitic herbs are not aggres- Total Number of 27 282 4,718 sive and are used as ornamentals in Parasitic Plants gardens such as the Indian paintbrush (Castilleja coccinea, Orobanchaceae) and some species of louseworts (Pedicularis they are also considered obligate parasites. spp., Orobanchaceae). The relationships between mistletoes and The most recognized parasitic plants hosts is complex and involves compatibil- are probably mistletoes which are aerial ity at the physical, physiological, and most hemiparasitic shrubs. Mistletoes are part likely genetic levels. Mistletoes, as well as of the folklore from many countries and other parasitic plants, can have unusual are still included in modern traditions chloroplast genomes with major alteration such as the Christmas custom of kissing or losses of genes and rearrangements of under the mistletoe for enduring love. The their genomes due to their dependence on Christmas mistletoe involves two species: hosts. the European Viscum album and its Amer- Most mistletoes also have intimate in- ican counterpart Phoradendron leucarpum. teractions with birds, depending on them However, mistletoes are a diverse group for seed dispersal and sometimes pollina- comprising about 1,663 species in 90 gen- tion services. In fact, studies have shown era distributed around the globe, especially that there are lineages of birds and mistle- in the tropics. All mistletoes belong to toes that have coevolved, where birds spe- order Santalales where they are classified cialize in feeding on mistletoe fruits and in five families: “Amphorogynaceae”, Lo- track them across the landscape. In a simi- ranthaceae, Misodendraceae, Santalaceae, lar way, some mistletoes have evolved spe- and “Viscaceae”. cialization to grow only in one or a few Aerial shrubby habit of a mistletoe All mistletoes have the capacity to species of trees. For example, the dwarf (Dendropemon purpureus, Loranthaceae) create their own food through photosyn- mistletoe (Arceuthobium, Viscaceae) para- on the branches of a calabash tree thesis, hence the term “hemiparasites”. Ho- sitizes pines (Pinaceae), junipers and cy- (Crescentia cujete) in Gonave Island, Haiti. wever, since mistletoes depend on hosts to presses (Cupressaceae) exclusively. In spite (photo by M. Caraballo) obtain water and some mineral nutrients, of being parasites, mistletoes are important Page 2 showcase for the study of biogeography and diversification in the region. During an integrative taxonomic revi- sion in preparation, I have discovered sev- eral new species of Dendropemon and a series of nomenclatural and taxonomic changes in the genus, highlighting the im- portance of combining herbarium spe- cimens, fieldwork, and modern molecular techniques to revise the taxonomy of this poorly known and diverse group. My work also incorporates the conservation of en- dangered parasitic plants, especially when they are island-endemic and depend on rare host trees for their survival. In summary, parasitic plants such as mistletoes offer an excellent opportunity to study the evolution of interactions be- tween plants from the genomic and eco- logical perspectives. My research emphasizes the need to conduct integrative taxonomic studies of poorly known groups of organisms using traditional herbarium studies and modern molecular techniques to assess their global diversity. The Plant Press New Series - Vol. 22 - No. 4 Inflorescence of the American cancer-root (Conopholis americana, Orobanchaceae) Chair of Botany parasitizing the roots of a red oak tree (Quercus rubra, Fagaceae) at the Shenandoah Eric Schuettpelz National Park, Virginia. Note the yellowish color of the plant which reflects its ([email protected]) holoparasitic nature. (photo by M. Caraballo) EDITORIAL STAFF components of ecosystems and are even harbor a rich endemic flora, and the Ca- Editor considered keystone species because of ribbean Islands are not an exception. The Gary Krupnick their capacity to attract and maintain bio- Caribbean island archipelago is one of the ([email protected]) diversity. world’s top five hotspots of biodiversity, Copy Editors My current research project at the Na- containing one the highest concentrations Robin Everly, Bernadette Gibbons, and tional Museum of Natural History is fo- of endemic plant and animal species on Rose Gulledge cused on the genetics and taxonomy of the planet, but much of the endemic diver- The Plant Press is a quarterly publication provided mistletoes from tropical America. With a sity remains little studied. An outstanding free of charge. To receive notification of when new concentration on the Loranthaceous mis- component of these island-endemic floras pdf issues are posted to the web, please subscribe tletoes, I am exploring the structure of are mistletoes in the genus Dendropemon to the listserve by sending a message to their chloroplast genomes and building a (Loranthaceae), which is one of the most [email protected] containing only the following in the body of the text: SUBSCRIBE phylogeny that will include almost all species-rich of the 180 island-endemic PLANTPRESS-NEWS Firstname Lastname. known Neotropical genera. The results plant genera
Recommended publications
  • The Vegetation of Robinson Crusoe Island (Isla Masatierra), Juan
    The Vegetation ofRobinson Crusoe Island (Isla Masatierra), Juan Fernandez Archipelago, Chile1 Josef Greimler,2,3 Patricio Lopez 5., 4 Tod F. Stuessy, 2and Thomas Dirnbiick5 Abstract: Robinson Crusoe Island of the Juan Fernandez Archipelago, as is the case with many oceanic islands, has experienced strong human disturbances through exploitation ofresources and introduction of alien biota. To understand these impacts and for purposes of diversity and resource management, an accu­ rate assessment of the composition and structure of plant communities was made. We analyzed the vegetation with 106 releves (vegetation records) and subsequent Twinspan ordination and produced a detailed colored map at 1: 30,000. The resultant map units are (1) endemic upper montane forest, (2) endemic lower montane forest, (3) Ugni molinae shrubland, (4) Rubus ulmifolius­ Aristotelia chilensis shrubland, (5) fern assemblages, (6) Libertia chilensis assem­ blage, (7) Acaena argentea assemblage, (8) native grassland, (9) weed assemblages, (10) tall ruderals, and (11) cultivated Eucalyptus, Cupressus, and Pinus. Mosaic patterns consisting of several communities are recognized as mixed units: (12) combined upper and lower montane endemic forest with aliens, (13) scattered native vegetation among rocks at higher elevations, (14) scattered grassland and weeds among rocks at lower elevations, and (15) grassland with Acaena argentea. Two categories are included that are not vegetation units: (16) rocks and eroded areas, and (17) settlement and airfield. Endemic forests at lower elevations and in drier zones of the island are under strong pressure from three woody species, Aristotelia chilensis, Rubus ulmifolius, and Ugni molinae. The latter invades native forests by ascending dry slopes and ridges.
    [Show full text]
  • ('Mitrastemoneae'). Maki- No's Initial Use in 1909 of This Name (As 'Mitrastemmaeae') Is Invalid As No Descrip- Tion in Either Japanese Or English Was Given (Dr
    BLUMEA 38 (1993) 221-229 A revision of Mitrastema (Rafflesiaceae) W. Meijer & J.F. Veldkamp Summary Makino called Mitrastemon has Mitrastema (Rafflesiaceae), usually incorrectly Makino, two spe- cies, one in Southeast Asia and one in Central and South America. Introduction Mitrastema was described by Makino (1909) on M. (‘Mitrastemma’) yamamotoi Makino. He intended to name the genus after the mitre-shaped staminal tube, as becomes evident when in 1911 he changed the name to Mitrastemon.This change is On the other Stearn not allowed and Mitrastemon is a superfluous name. hand, as (1973: 519) has pointed out, the Greek words 'sterna' (thread, stamen) and 'stemma' confused, ‘Mitrastemma’ be (garland or wreath) are easily and so may regarded as an orthographic error to be corrected under Art. 73.1 (Exx. 2, 3). ‘Mitrastemon’ or ‘Mitrastemma’ have been adopted in laterpublications, and even by the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, where the name Mitrastemonaceae, invalid because it is based on an invalid name contrary to Art. 18.1, is conserved (1988: 104). Since its description Mitrastema yamamotoi has become one of the most widely of the Rafflesiaceae. Watanabe's investigated taxa Especially papers on its morphol- and of devoted it is still ogy biology (1933-1937) are masterpieces study; yet not clear what the precise taxonomic position of the genus is and whether it really be- longs to the Rafflesiaceae. Some authors have regarded it as a distinct family, Mitrastemonaceae Makino (1911) (nom. cons.) (e.g. Cronquist, 1981; 'Mitrastemmataceae', Mabberley, 1987), treatedit Rafflesiaceae tribe others have as Mitrastemateae ('Mitrastemoneae'). Maki- no's initial use in 1909 of this name (as 'Mitrastemmaeae') is invalid as no descrip- tion in either Japanese or English was given (Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassytha Pubescens
    Cassytha pubescens: Germination biology and interactions with native and introduced hosts Hong Tai (Steven), Tsang B.Sc. Hons (University of Adelaide) Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science School of Earth & Environmental Science University of Adelaide, Australia 03/05/2010 i Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... ii Abstract .......................................................................................................................... v Declaration ................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... viii Chapter. 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 General Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Literature Review ................................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Characteristics of parasitic control agents .................................................... 3 1.2.2. Direct impacts on hosts ................................................................................ 7 1.2.3. Indirect impacts on hosts ............................................................................. 8 1.2.4. Summary ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heterotrophic Carbon Gain and Mineral Nutrition of the Root Hemi-Parasite Santalum Album L
    128 Heterotrophic carbon gain and mineral nutrition of Santa fum album L. Heterotrophic carbon gain and mineral nutrition of the root hemi-parasite Santalum album L. in pot culture with different hosts. Andrew M. Radomiljaci.2·A, Jen A. McComb2 and JohnS. Pate3 1Present address: Department of Conservation and Land Management, CALMSharefarms Maritime Pine, Lot 1, 260 Kalamunda Road, South Guilford, 6055, Western Australia 2Division of Science, Biological Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Western Australia 3Department of Botany, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth 6907, Western Australia Revised manuscript received 8 January 1999 Summary tices in relation to the best host species, and how to achieve This paper examines heterotrophic gain of carbon and min­ the highest volume and quality of sandalwood in a particular eral composition of Santalum album partnered singly in pot set of environmental circumstances. culture with three beneficial woody N,-tixing hosts and a non­ Our current projects, aimed at defining the best protocols for beneficial eucalypt host. Based on dry matter gains of the growth of S. album under irrigation culture in the Ord River parasite at 33 weeks, Sesbaniaformosa proved the best host region of North West Australia, have utilised a native herba­ followed by Acacia ampliceps and A. trachycarpa while no ceous perennial, Alternanthera nana R. Br., as a host during improvement in growth was seen with Eucalyptus pot culture with seedlings of the parasite, followed by use of camaldulensis as a host in comparison with Santalum grown various fast growing but relatively short lived species as 'in­ without a host. Numbers of haustoria formed by Santalum termediate hosts' once plants are transferred to the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Castilleja Coccinea and C. Indivisa (Orobanchaceae)
    Nesom, G.L. and J.M. Egger. 2014. Castilleja coccinea and C. indivisa (Orobanchaceae). Phytoneuron 2014-14: 1–7. Published 6 January 2014. ISSN 2153 733X CASTILLEJA COCCINEA AND C. INDIVISA (OROBANCHACEAE) GUY L. NESOM 2925 Hartwood Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76109 www.guynesom.com J. M ARK EGGER Herbarium, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195-5325 [email protected] ABSTRACT Castilleja coccinea and C. indivisa are contrasted in morphology and their ranges mapped in detail in the southern USA, where they are natively sympatric in small areas of Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana. Castilleja indivisa has recently been introduced and naturalized in the floras of Alabama and Florida. Castilleja ludoviciana , known only by the type collection from southwestern Louisiana, differs from C. coccinea in subentire leaves and relatively small flowers and is perhaps a population introgressed by C. indivisa . Castilleja coccinea and C. indivisa are allopatric except in small areas of Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Lousiana, but assessments of their native distributions are not consistent among various accounts (e.g. Thomas & Allen 1997; Turner et al. 2003; OVPD 2012; USDA, NRCS 2013). Morphological contrasts between the two species, via keys in floristic treatments (e.g., Smith 1994; Wunderlin & Hansen 2003; Nelson 2009; Weakley 2012), have essentially repeated the differences outlined by Pennell (1935). The current study presents an evaluation and summary of the taxonomy of these two species. We have examined specimens at CAS, TEX-LL, SMU-BRIT-VDB, MO, NLU, NO, USF, WS, and WTU and viewed digital images available through Florida herbaria and databases.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Pellets from Three Forest Species: from Raw Material to End Use
    Article Assessment of Pellets from Three Forest Species: From Raw Material to End Use Miguel Alfonso Quiñones-Reveles 1,Víctor Manuel Ruiz-García 2,* , Sarai Ramos-Vargas 2 , Benedicto Vargas-Larreta 1 , Omar Masera-Cerutti 2 , Maginot Ngangyo-Heya 3 and Artemio Carrillo-Parra 4,* 1 Sustainable Forest Development Master of Science Program, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de El Salto, El Salto, Pueblo Nuevo 34942, Mexico; [email protected] (M.A.Q.-R.); [email protected] (B.V.-L.) 2 Bioenergy Laboratory and Bioenergy Innovation and Assessment Laboratory (LINEB), Ecosystems Research Institute and Sustainability (IIES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Morelia 58190, Mexico; [email protected] (S.R.-V.); [email protected] (O.M.-C.) 3 Faculty of Agronomy (FA), Autonomous University of Nuevo León (UANL), Francisco Villa s/n, Col. Ex-Hacienda “El Canadá”, Escobedo 66050, Mexico; [email protected] 4 Institute of Silviculture and Wood Industry (ISIMA), Juarez University of the State of Durango (UJED), Boulevard del Guadiana 501, Ciudad Universitaria, Torre de Investigación, Durango 34120, Mexico * Correspondence: [email protected] (V.M.R.-G.); [email protected] (A.C.-P.) Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the relationship between chemical properties, energy efficiency, and emissions of wood and pellets from madroño Arbutus xalapensis Kunth, tázcate Juniperus deppeana Steud, and encino colorado Quercus sideroxyla Humb. & Bonpl. in two gasifiers (top-lit-up-draft (T-LUD) and electricity
    [Show full text]
  • Cassytha) and Insights Into the Plastid Phylogenomics of Lauraceae
    GBE Plastome Evolution in the Sole Hemiparasitic Genus Laurel Dodder (Cassytha) and Insights into the Plastid Phylogenomics of Lauraceae Chung-Shien Wu1,†, Ting-Jen Wang1,†,Chia-WenWu1, Ya-Nan Wang2, and Shu-Miaw Chaw1,* 1Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan 2School of Forestry and Resource Conservation, Nation Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. †These authors contributed equally to this work. Accepted: September 6, 2017 Data deposition: This project has been deposited at DDBJ under the accession numbers LC210517, LC212965, LC213014, and LC228240. Abstract To date, little is known about the evolution of plastid genomes (plastomes) in Lauraceae. As one of the top five largest families in tropical forests, the Lauraceae contain many species that are important ecologically and economically. Lauraceous species also provide wonderful materials to study the evolutionary trajectory in response to parasitism because they contain both nonparasitic and parasitic species. This study compared the plastomes of nine Lauraceous species, including the sole hemiparasitic and herbaceous genus Cassytha (laurel dodder; here represented by Cassytha filiformis). We found differential contractions of the canonical inverted repeat (IR), resulting in two IR types present in Lauraceae. These two IR types reinforce Cryptocaryeae and Neocinnamomum— Perseeae–Laureae as two separate clades. Our data reveal several traits unique to Cas. filiformis, including loss of IRs, loss or pseudogenization of 11 ndh and rpl23 genes, richness of repeats, and accelerated rates of nucleotide substitutions in protein- coding genes. Although Cas. filiformis is low in chlorophyll content, our analysis based on dN/dS ratios suggests that both its plastid house-keeping and photosynthetic genes are under strong selective constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • 1083 a Ground-Breaking Study Published 5 Years Ago Revealed That
    American Journal of Botany 100(6): 1083–1094. 2013. SPECIAL INVITED PAPER—EVOLUTION OF PLANT MATING SYSTEMS P OLLINATION AND MATING SYSTEMS OF APODANTHACEAE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS 1 IN PARASITIC ANGIOSPERMS S IDONIE B ELLOT 2 AND S USANNE S. RENNER 2 Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Str. 67 80638 Munich, Germany • Premise of the study: The most recent reviews of the reproductive biology and sexual systems of parasitic angiosperms were published 17 yr ago and reported that dioecy might be associated with parasitism. We use current knowledge on parasitic lineages and their sister groups, and data on the reproductive biology and sexual systems of Apodanthaceae, to readdress the question of possible trends in the reproductive biology of parasitic angiosperms. • Methods: Fieldwork in Zimbabwe and Iran produced data on the pollinators and sexual morph frequencies in two species of Apodanthaceae. Data on pollinators, dispersers, and sexual systems in parasites and their sister groups were compiled from the literature. • Key results: With the possible exception of some Viscaceae, most of the ca. 4500 parasitic angiosperms are animal-pollinated, and ca. 10% of parasites are dioecious, but the gain and loss of dioecy across angiosperms is too poorly known to infer a statisti- cal correlation. The studied Apodanthaceae are dioecious and pollinated by nectar- or pollen-foraging Calliphoridae and other fl ies. • Conclusions: Sister group comparisons so far do not reveal any reproductive traits that evolved (or were lost) concomitant with a parasitic life style, but the lack of wind pollination suggests that this pollen vector may be maladaptive in parasites, perhaps because of host foliage or fl owers borne close to the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Management Activities and Practices
    WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND PRACTICES COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLANNING GUIDELINES for the Pineywoods Ecological Region Revised April 2010 The following Texas Parks & Wildlife Department staff have contributed to this document: Mike Krueger, Technical Guidance Biologist – Lampasas Kirby Brown, Private Lands and Habitat Program Director (Retired) Rick Larkin, formerly of TPWD Micah Poteet, Technical Guidance Biologist – Lufkin Linda Campbell, Program Director, Private Lands and Public Hunting Program—Austin Linda McMurry, Private Lands and Public Hunting Program Assistant – Austin With Additional Contributions From: Terry Turney, Rare Species Biologist, San Marcos Trey Carpenter, Manager, Granger Wildlife Management Area Dale Prochaska, Private Lands Biologist – Kerr Wildlife Management Area Nathan Rains, Private Lands Biologist – Cleburne TABLE OF CONTENTS Comprehensive Wildlife Management Planning Guidelines for the Pineywoods Ecological Region Introduction Specific Habitat Management Practices Habitat Control Erosion Control Predator Control Providing Supplemental Water Providing Supplemental Food Providing Supplemental Shelter Census APPENDICES APPENDIX A: General Habitat Management Considerations, Recommendations,and Intensity Levels APPENDIX B: Detemining Qualification for Wildlife Management Use APPENDIX C: Wildlife Management Plan Overview APPENDIX D: Livestock Management Recommendations APPENDIX E: Vegetation Management Recommendations APPENDIX F: Specific Management Recommendations for White-tailed Deer APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • Invisible Connections: Introduction to Parasitic Plants Dr
    Invisible Connections: Introduction to Parasitic Plants Dr. Vanessa Beauchamp Towson University What is a parasite? • An organism that lives in or on an organism of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Symbiosis https://www.superpharmacy.com.au/blog/parasites-protozoa-worms-ectoparasites Food acquisition in plants: Autotrophy Heterotrophs (“different feeding”) • True parasites: obtain carbon compounds from host plants through haustoria. • Myco-heterotrophs: obtain carbon compounds from host plants via Image Credit: Flickr User wackybadger, via CC mycorrhizal fungal connection. • Carnivorous plants (not parasitic): obtain nutrients (phosphorus, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pin nitrogen) from trapped insects. k_indian_pipes.jpg http://www.welivealot.com/venus-flytrap- facts-for-kids/ Parasite vs. Epiphyte https://chatham.ces.ncsu.edu/2014/12/does-mistletoe-harm-trees-2/ By © Hans Hillewaert /, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6289695 True Parasitic Plants • Gains all or part of its nutrition from another plant (the host). • Does not contribute to the benefit of the host and, in some cases, causing extreme damage to the host. • Specialized peg-like root (haustorium) to penetrate host plants. https://www.britannica.com/plant/parasitic-plant https://chatham.ces.ncsu.edu/2014/12/does-mistletoe-harm-trees-2/ Diversity of parasitic plants Eudicots • Parasitism has evolved independently at least 12 times within the plant kingdom. • Approximately 4,500 parasitic species in Monocots 28 families. • Found in eudicots and basal angiosperms • 1% of the dicot angiosperm species • No monocot angiosperm species Basal angiosperms Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016.67:643-667 True Parasitic Plants https://www.alamy.com/parasitic-dodder-plant-cuscuta-showing-penetration-parasitic-haustor The defining structural feature of a parasitic plant is the haustorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Slide. I Want to Thank Dave Watson for Inviting Me to Talk at This Symposium
    Title Slide. I want to thank Dave Watson for inviting me to talk at this Symposium. It’s always a pleasure to speak to an audience that is already pre- selected as being interested in mistletoes! 1 Slide. Studies of Loranthaceae. The largest family of mistletoes is Loranthaceae. And as one might expect, it has been the subject of many scientific studies. This slide shows a variety of subdisciplines within biology that have focused on Loranthaceae, as well as a few areas that to date have not received any attention. 2 Slide. My talk today will focus upon the taxonomy and evolutionary biology of Loranthaceae. As indicated in the title, I want to demonstrate how developing a meaningful taxonomy for a group is best accomplished using the most powerful tool in the systematist’s toolkit: molecular phylogenetics. 3 Slide. Santalales: The Largest Group of Parasitic Plants. Among the twelve orders of flowering plants in which haustorial parasitism evolved, only two have more than three genera: Lamiales and Santalales. Of these, Lamiales contains a single family of hemi- and holoparasitic plants: Orobanchaceae with 93 genera (32%) and 1725 species (39%). Santalales is the largest order of parasitic plants, with 179 genera (61%) and 2407 species (54%). It’s the only order of parasitic plant with more than one family. 4 Slide. Within Santalales, Loranthaceae has by far the highest number of genera (75) with Balanophoraceae coming in second (17). 5 Slide. Loranthaceae also the highest number of species (987) with Viscaceae and Thesiaceae coming in second and third. 6 Slide. This slide has sorted the loranth genera according to size (number of species).
    [Show full text]
  • Okoubaka Aubrevillei (Pelleg & Norman): a Synthesis of Existing Knowledge for Research and Conservation in West and Central Africa
    Journal of Biology and Life Science ISSN 2157-6076 2015, Vol. 6, No. 1 Okoubaka Aubrevillei (Pelleg & Norman): A Synthesis of Existing Knowledge for Research and Conservation in West and Central Africa Temitope Israel Borokini1,2 1Plant Genetic Resources Unit, National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB), Ibadan, Nigeria 2Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, College of Science, University of Nevada Reno, Reno NV 89557-0314. E-mail: [email protected] Received: October 4, 2014 Accepted: October 21, 2014 doi:10.5296/jbls.v6i1.6399 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jbls.v6i1.6399 Abstract Okoubaka aubrevillei is the largest parasitic plant known to man. It is a tropical tree species distributed within West and Central Africa. Concerns were drawn to the tree because of its rarity, disjunct distribution in all its native range, paucity of published scientific information and its hemi-parasitic potentials. This article gathered and synthesized all existing scientific information on the tree to provide a solid foundation for further research on the tree. This article provided detailed information on its name etymology, taxonomic history, and geographical distribution including new locations for the tree, ecological significance and behaviour within its range, supported with an updated map illustrating its distribution within West and Central Africa. The possible causes of its rarity in its range were identified and its hemi-parasitic behaviour was hypothesized. In addition, ethnobotanical uses of the tree, symbolism and dendrolatry, and its significance in modern medicine were extensively discussed. The paper concluded with highlights on prospects for immediate conservation, management and research focus areas for the tree species.
    [Show full text]