DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Resilience to Biothreats: an Assessment of Unmet Core Global Health Security Needs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Resilience to Biothreats: an Assessment of Unmet Core Global Health Security Needs An assessment of unmet core global health security needs A Copyright © 2019 by EcoHealth Alliance Suggested citation: Carlin EP, Machalaba C, Berthe FCJ, Long KC, Karesh WB. Building resilience to biothreats: an assessment of unmet core global health security needs. EcoHealth Alliance. 2019. An assessment of unmet core BUILDING global health security needs TO BIOTHREATS BUILDING RESILIENCE TO BIOTHREATS AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Ellen P. Carlin Numerous individuals contributed to this endeavor. We wish to thank Senior Health and Policy Specialist, EcoHealth Alliance the participants who attended our Washington, D.C. roundtable, many Catherine Machalaba of whom came from great distances to do so, including across the Atlantic Policy Advisor and Research Scientist, EcoHealth Alliance Ocean. We thank the World Bank Group for hosting the roundtable Franck C.J. Berthe and for generously providing additional expertise and collaboration Senior Livestock Specialist, World Bank throughout the study process, including through a Knowledge Exchange Kanya C. Long event. The written report benefitted considerably from the input of many AAAS Roger Revelle Fellow in Global Stewardship/Health Specialist, World Bank interview participants and peer reviewers. Officials from the government William B. Karesh of Liberia were especially gracious with their time to provide valuable Executive Vice President, EcoHealth Alliance country perspective. Jim Desmond and Amanda Andre, both from EcoHealth Alliance, provided significant guidance, coordination, and assistance. The kind help of Barbara Machado and Timothy Bouley from the World Bank was also sincerely appreciated. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the generous support and enthusiasm of the project’s funder, the Smith Richardson Foundation. In addition to literature research, the following events and experts formed the backbone of this project’s information gathering phases, and allowed for substantial deliberation of results and conclusions: ii BUILDING RESILIENCE TO BIOTHREATS Roundtable World Bank Knowledge Exchange Washington, DC Washington, DC James Allen, Chevron Project investigators held an exchange of ideas with World Bank colleagues on Casey Barton Behravesh, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the study’s findings to share views, with a focus on operational and practical Franck Berthe, World Organisation for Animal Health and World Bank experiences and lessons learned from World Bank operations. The event Lance Brooks, U.S. Department of Defense was chaired by Olusoji Adeyi. The insight from all participants, including Elizabeth Cameron, Nuclear Threat Initiative Discussant John Paul Clark, was greatly appreciated. Justin Cormier, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Ricardo Echalar, U.S. Agency for International Development Interviews and consultations Hamid Jafari, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Stéphane de la Rocque, World Health Organization Franca Jones, U.S. Department of Defense Rebecca Katz, Georgetown University William B. Karesh, EcoHealth Alliance Nicole Lurie, CEPI – Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations Mario Libel, Ending Pandemics Dawn O’Connell, CEPI – Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations Kanya Long, World Bank David Morens, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Peer reviewers Gerald Parker, Texas A&M University James Allen, Chevron Dademanao Pissang Tchangai, Food and Agriculture Organization Ryan Morhard, World Economic Forum of the United Nations Simo Nikkari Ronald Waldman, George Washington University Erin M. Sorrell, Georgetown University Claire J. Standley, Georgetown University Liberia mission Gary A. Vroegindewey, Lincoln Memorial University Monrovia, Liberia Paul van der Merwe, South Africa Defence Force Chadia Wannous, Towards a Safer World Network for Pandemic Preparedness The research team traveled to Liberia to ground truth its findings from a cross- ministerial, country-level perspective. In a roundtable setting, partners from the National Public Health Institute of Liberia (NPHIL), Central Veterinary Laboratory, and Forestry Development Authority provided their expert perspective on how well the identified functions and initiatives align with the assessments, experience, and needs in their sector and at a national level. While in Liberia, we also benefitted considerably from attending additional meetings convened through Liberia’s One Health Coordination Platform to learn more about the country’s cross-cutting efforts across public health, forestry, environmental protection, agriculture, and other agencies. We especially thank Tolbert Nyenswah and Sonpon Sieh for their generosity in welcoming us and allowing us to learn from Liberia’s efforts. iii BUILDING RESILIENCE TO BIOTHREATS PREFACE The Ebola crisis of 2014-2016 in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone spurred a substantial rethinking of how the global community must orient itself toward preventing, mitigating, and responding to the impacts of major infectious disease events. Nations, companies, and philanthropies poured billions of dollars into direct Ebola response and into activities and initiatives designed to ensure against another Ebola-like event. Four years later, we sought to understand where this self-reflection and new-found commitment to global health security has brought us. We looked not to the country level, where abundant programs and assessments are ongoing, but instead to the global stage of actors. Our intent was to capture the systematic initiatives operating worldwide to address the core functions outlined in prominent global health security frameworks. We suspected that behind the many and productive policy and programmatic efforts there remain core capabilities that are insufficiently addressed or not addressed at all at this level. We began with the assumption that progress was abundant yet uneven. We also assumed that the major frameworks themselves might be drawn too narrowly to account for the full scope of outbreak sources—intentional and unintentional spillover or release— and the distinct but complementary capacities needed to address them. We know of no group that has undertaken an end-to-end review of the primary functions needed for effective prevention through recovery from pandemics, regardless of their origin, and an assessment of which functions are receiving insufficient attention. Any weak link in the global health security system can jeopardize the ability to prevent and manage high-consequence outbreaks. A high-level evaluation, therefore, is necessary and timely. Much of the work needed to build a world resilient to catastrophic health threats is really just beginning; we hope that this assessment will play a role in building the scaffolding to create that world. iv BUILDING RESILIENCE TO BIOTHREATS TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES, TABLES, AND BOXES Preface............................................................ iv Figures Figure 1. Global health security pillars as a circular flow of capability Glossary ...........................................................2 Figure 2. Examples of activities and trajectory of impacts along the prevent-detect-respond-recover spectrum Acronyms ..........................................................3 Tables Executive Summary...................................................6 Table 1. Pillars and supporting functions for global health security Table 2. Major global-level financial resources mobilized for global Introduction .......................................................10 health security (funding received or requested) Table 3. Mapping of global health security initiatives to pillars Identification of Core Support Functions .................................16 Boxes Implementation Efforts for Core Support Functions .........................24 Box 1. 2009 H1N1: the last major pandemic Box 2. 2001 Amerithrax: the last major bioterrorism event Governance and Legal Frameworks.....................................25 Box 3. Investing in public and animal health systems, with lessons from Vietnam Financing .......................................................27 Box 4. One Health coordination for health security in Liberia Box 5. Nexus of insecurity: conflict and fragility in the Kasai Initiatives .......................................................32 region of the Democratic Republic of Congo Box 6. Convergent risk drivers: potential impacts of climate change Pillars and Support Functions in Need of Attention .........................36 and urbanization on vector-borne diseases in Mauritania Box 7. Closing the loop: from an effective response to epidemic Conclusions and Recommendations .....................................48 plague to informed recovery and prevention in Madagascar Box 8. Where does the private sector fit in? References .........................................................54 1 BUILDING RESILIENCE TO BIOTHREATS GLOSSARY Recognizing that many of the following terms have multiple meanings or usages, this glossary provides definitions for the purpose of this report; these have been sourced or adapted from a variety of existing and published definitions. Biodefense. Activities directed to thwart biothreats of intentional or Global health security. A state characterized by sufficient epidemic and unintentional origin. pandemic preparedness and capabilities in order to minimize vulnerability to acute public health events that can endanger the health of populations Biosecurity. 1) Prevention of theft, diversion,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Security and Public Health
    Editorial I am pleased to present this special issue of the Pan American Journal of Public Human security Health/Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, dedicated to the topic of human and public health security within the context of public health. Human security and its relation- ship with health, social determinants, the Millennium Development Goals, and human rights are inseparable concepts that need to be understood in greater Mirta Roses Periago1 depth by public health researchers and practitioners as well as policymakers at all levels of government. Human security is an emerging paradigm for understanding global vulnerabilities that has evolved over the past two decades from being a tradi- tional notion of national security with heavy investments in military prepared- ness and response to focusing more on the dimensions that sustain the security of people through investing in human and community development. Today, the human security paradigm maintains that a people-centered view of security is vitally essential for national, regional, and global stability. The concept’s dimensions were first presented in the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Human Development Report 1994 (1)—considered a milestone publication in the field of human security—which put forth the criti- cal proposal that ensuring “freedom from want” and “freedom from fear” for all persons is the best path to tackle the problem of global insecurity. The UNDP devoted a chapter of the report to the need to shift the paradigm from state-centered security to people-centered security; from nuclear security to human security. The chapter on the new dimensions of human security states: The concept of security has for too long been interpreted nar- rowly as security of territory from external aggression, or as protection of national interests in foreign policy, or as global security from the threat of a nuclear holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccinating the World in 2021
    Vaccinating the World in 2021 TAMSIN BERRY DAVID BRITTO JILLIAN INFUSINO BRIANNA MILLER DR GABRIEL SEIDMAN DANIEL SLEAT EMILY STANGER-SFEILE MAY 2021 RYAN WAIN Contents Foreword 4 Executive Summary 6 Vaccinating the World in 2021: The Plan 8 Modelling 11 The Self-Interested Act of Vaccinating the World 13 Vaccinating the World: Progress Report 17 Part 1: Optimise Available Supply in 2021 19 Part 2: Reduce Shortfall by Boosting Vaccine Supply 22 The Short Term: Continue Manufacturing Medium- and Long-Term Manufacturing Part 3: Ensure Vaccine Supply Reaches People 37 Improving Absorption Capacity: A Blueprint Reducing Vaccine Hesitancy Financing Vaccine Rollout Part 4: Coordinate Distribution of Global Vaccine Supply 44 Conclusion 47 Endnotes 48 4 Vaccinating the World in 2021 Foreword We should have recognised the warning signs that humanity’s international response to Covid-19 could get bogged down in geopolitical crosscurrents. In early March 2020, a senior Chinese leader proclaimed in a published report that Covid-19 could be turned into an opportunity to increase dependency on China and the Chinese economy. The following month, due in part to the World Health Organisation’s refusal to include Taiwan in its decision- making body, the Trump administration suspended funding to the agency. In May 2020, President Trump announced plans to formally withdraw from it. Quite naturally, many public-health experts and policymakers were discouraged by the growing possibility that global politics could overshadow efforts to unite the world in the effort to fight the disease. However, this report from the Global Health Security Consortium offers hope. It recommends a strategic approach to “vaccine diplomacy” that can help the world bring the pandemic under control.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Investments to Prevent Emerging Diseases
    Publication: Bulletin of the World Health Organization; Type: Perspectives Article ID: BLT.17.199547 Daniel L Schar et al. Emerging disease economics This online first version has been peer-reviewed, accepted and edited, but not formatted and finalized with corrections from authors and proofreaders A framework for investments to prevent emerging diseases Daniel L Schar,a Gavin Mark Yamey,b Catherine C Machalaba c & William B c Karesh a United States Agency for International Development, Regional Development Mission for Asia, Athenee Tower, 25th Floor, 63 Wireless Road, Lumpini, Patumwan, 10330, Bangkok, Thailand. b Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, United States of America (USA). c EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA. Correspondence to Daniel L Schar (email: [email protected]). (Submitted: 15 March 2017 – Revised version received: 3 October 2017 – Accepted: 5 October 2017 – Published online: 14 November 2017) The increase in both the number of events and diversity of emerging infectious diseases is threatening public and animal health. 1 Over the last decade alone, the global community has experienced the repeated burden of emerging diseases, from pandemic influenza to Ebola and Zika virus epidemics. Other pathogens, notably influenza A (H7N9), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Nipah virus, have demonstrated their capacity to become global threats. In parallel, the increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant pathogens has become a pressing global health threat that challenges both the human and animal health sectors. The prospect of a post-antibiotic era prompted a high-level consultation on antimicrobial resistance at the 2016 United Nations General Assembly. It was only the fourth such occasion Member States convened and issued a declaration associated with a developing health crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Framework for COVID-19 Vaccine Allocation and Distribution in the United States
    Interim Framework for COVID-19 Vaccine Allocation and Distribution in the United States August 2020 Authors Eric Toner, MD Senior Scholar, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Senior Scientist, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Anne Barnill, PhD Research Scholar, Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics Associate Faculty, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Carleigh Krubiner, PhD (former) Research Scholar, Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics Policy Fellow, Center for Global Health Development Justin Bernstein, PhD (former) Hecht-Levi Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics Assistant Professor, Florida Atlantic University Lois Privor-Dumm, IMBA Senior Advisor, Policy, Advocacy, and Communications, Johns Hopkins International Vaccine Access Center Senior Research Associate, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Mathew Watson Senior Analyst, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Senior Research Associate, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Elena Martin, MPH Analyst, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Research Associate, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Christina Potter, MSPH Analyst, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Research Associate, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Divya Hosangadi, MSPH Senior Analyst, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Research Associate, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Nancy Connell, PhD Senior Scholar, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Professor,
    [Show full text]
  • Global Influenza Strategy 2019-2030
    20, AVENUE APPIA – CH-1211 GENEVA 27 – SWITZERLAND – TEL CENTRAL +41 22 791 2111 – FAX CENTRAL +41 22 791 3111 – WWW.WHO.INT Global Influenza Strategy 2019-2030 Influenza is a serious global health threat that impacts all countries: every year, there are an estimated 1 billion cases, 3-5 million severe cases, and 290 000-650 000 influenza-related respiratory deaths worldwide. In this interconnected world, the next influenza pandemic is a matter of when not if, and a severe pandemic is believed by many experts to be potentially the most devastating global health event with far reaching consequences. The Global Influenza Strategy for 2019-2030 provides a framework for WHO, countries and partners to approach influenza holistically through robust national programmes – from surveillance to disease prevention and control – with the goal of strengthening seasonal prevention and control and preparedness for future pandemics. To achieve this, the strategy places a large focus on the following: 1. the development of better global tools, such as vaccines, antivirals and treatments, that would benefit all countries and instil public confidence and uptake; and 2. stronger country capacities that are integrated within national health security planning and universal health coverage efforts. Influenza prevention, control and preparedness are functional building blocks for capacity-building and can enhance core capacities across the health spectrum; a country-level approach and country ownership are vital for ensuring sustainability of national influenza programmes, which serve as an investment for greater health system strengthening and pandemic preparedness. With its focus on country impact, the strategy is aligned with the goals of WHO’s 13th General Programme of Work for achieving universal health coverage, addressing health emergencies and promoting healthier populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Emergencies As Threats to National Security
    Public Health Emergencies as Threats to National Security James G. Hodge, Jr., JD, LLM* & Kim Weidenaar, JD** INTRODUCTION Protecting the nation from a diverse array of public health threats remains a consummate objective of federal, state, and local governments. Achieving it is no simple task. Threats to the public’s health are multifarious, unpredictable, and downright scary in many cases. Media coverage of gruesome deaths from naturally-occurring diseases like Ebola tap into Americans’ fears of dangerous, deadly conditions.1 Confirmed links between Zika virus and infant micro- cephaly (e.g., small skulls and impaired brains), Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and other disabling conditions shape peoples’ perceptions of their own risks of infection.2 Legitimate and irrational fears are stoked by significant levels of distrust of government or industry.3 Virtually every major infectious disease or bioterrorism threat is coupled with loosely-based, albeit well-publicized, con- spiracy theories. They include everything from devious schemes to thin minor- ity populations or stealth efforts to unleash contaminants on an unknowing populace through dangerous vaccines, genetically-altered mosquitos, or other vectors.4 * Professor of Public Health Law and Ethics; Director, Public Health Law and Policy Program; Director, Network for Public Health Law – Western Region Office, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University (ASU). The authors would like to acknowledge the following individuals with ASU’s Public Health Law and Policy Program for their research and editing assistance: Sarah Wetter, Senior Legal Researcher and J.D. Candidate (2017); Brenna Carpenter, Senior Legal Researcher and J.D. Candidate (2017); and Matt Saria, Researcher and B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022
    National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 Saving Lives. Protecting Americans. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 NATIONAL HEALTH SECURITY OBJECTIVES ..................................................................... 1 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT AND THREAT LANDSCAPE .................................................. 3 Extreme Weather and Natural Disasters ............................................................................. 4 Pandemic and Infectious Diseases ..................................................................................... 5 Technology and Cyber Threats ........................................................................................... 6 Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Threats ..................................................... 7 STRATEGIC APPROACH ...................................................................................................... 8 Objective 1: Prepare, Mobilize, and Coordinate a Whole-of-Government Approach ............ 9 Objective 2: Protect the Nation from Emerging and Pandemic Infectious Diseases and CBRN Threats ...................................................................................................................13 Objective 3: Leverage the Capabilities of the Private Sector ..............................................18 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in One Health a Concerted Approach to Address Shared Risks to Humans, Animals, and the Environment
    POLICY BRIEF Investing in One Health A concerted approach to address shared risks to humans, animals, and the environment Health disasters like Ebola in West Africa, H5N1 Avian Influenza in Asia and Europe, and Zika virus in Latin America have significantly harmed both health and economies. Many of these countries afflicted by diseases of pandemic potential also face a persistent burden of endemic diseases such as rabies, Lassa virus, and brucellosis, and are challenged by bacteria increasingly resistant to antibiotics. Zoonotic diseases (transmitted between animals and humans) account for over a billion human cases and a million deaths annually. These disease threats compound poverty and obstruct development. Ecosystem alteration, climate change, and inadequate biosecurity are also disproportionately present in the developing world, and exacerbate existing and emergent disease risk. Strong, environmentally considerate, public health systems are needed to prevent, reduce, and manage risks to humans, animals, and the environment and are critical to achieve the World Bank’s twin goals of ending extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity. The One Health concept recognizes these connections and promotes coordination to better understand and manage risks. This approach can help countries achieve progress on national and global priorities includ- ing poverty alleviation, economic growth, food security, health, and well-being, toward achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). One Health: What It Is and Why It Matters Public health challenges at the human-animal-environment interfaces are inherently multi-sectoral, and therefore warrant whole-of-society solutions. The One Health concept recognizes the connections between humans, animals, and the environment and promotes coordination to better understand and manage risks.
    [Show full text]
  • HR 3448: Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness And
    H. R. 3448 One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two An Act To improve the ability of the United States to prevent, prepare for, and respond to bioterrorism and other public health emergencies. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of the Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS FOR BIOTERRORISM AND OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES Subtitle A—National Preparedness and Response Planning, Coordinating, and Reporting Sec. 101. National preparedness and response. Sec. 102. Assistant Secretary for Public Health Emergency Preparedness; National Disaster Medical System. Sec. 103. Improving ability of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sec. 104. Advisory committees and communications; study regarding communica­ tions abilities of public health agencies. Sec. 105. Education of health care personnel; training regarding pediatric issues. Sec. 106. Grants regarding shortages of certain health professionals. Sec. 107. Emergency system for advance registration of health professions volun­ teers. Sec. 108. Working group. Sec. 109. Antimicrobial resistance. Sec. 110. Supplies and services in lieu of award funds. Sec. 111. Additional amendments. Subtitle B—Strategic National Stockpile; Development of Priority Countermeasures Sec. 121. Strategic national stockpile.
    [Show full text]
  • One Health in Action (2009-2020)
    MALAYSIA One Health in action (2009-2020) The PREDICT project in Malaysia is an exemplary One Health success between EcoHealth Alliance and the Malaysian Government (human, wildlife and veterinary authorities) working together to find new viruses and strengthen human and laboratory capacity, an important step towards sustainable disease surveillance. MALAYSIA The PREDICT project, as part of USAID’s collaboration on zoonotic disease surveillance. Emerging Pandemic Threats program, seeks This close working and comitted group of to discover zoonotic viruses in wildlife before individuals and institutions have made significant they become human epidemics, and identify the advances in Malaysian research and surveillance factors that drive their emergence, amplification, infrastructure and have strengthened technical and spread in populations. EcoHealth Alliance capacity in that time, including the creation (EHA) and Conservation Medicine, the Ministry of two internationally certified labs dedicated of Health, Department of Wildlife and National to wildlife disease screening. In Malaysia, the Parks Peninsular Malaysia, and the Department project to date has identified 76 novel viruses of Veterinary Services have been working and 29 known viruses, providing the Malaysian together on zoonotic disease surveillance government with actionable data to inform risk in Malaysia since 2005. Expanding to Sabah mitigation policies at the national and state level. in 2012, EHA, Sabah Wildlife Department, and Sabah State Health Department began a LOCAL PARTNERS
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction and Prevention of the Next Pandemic Zoonosis
    Series Zoonoses 3 Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis Stephen S Morse, Jonna A K Mazet, Mark Woolhouse, Colin R Parrish, Dennis Carroll, William B Karesh, Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio, W Ian Lipkin, Peter Daszak Lancet 2012; 380: 1956–65 Most pandemics—eg, HIV/AIDS, severe acute respiratory syndrome, pandemic infl uenza—originate in animals, See Comment pages 1883 are caused by viruses, and are driven to emerge by ecological, behavioural, or socioeconomic changes. Despite their and 1884 substantial eff ects on global public health and growing understanding of the process by which they emerge, no This is the third in a Series of pandemic has been predicted before infecting human beings. We review what is known about the pathogens that three papers about zoonoses emerge, the hosts that they originate in, and the factors that drive their emergence. We discuss challenges to their Mailman School of Public control and new eff orts to predict pandemics, target surveillance to the most crucial interfaces, and identify Health (Prof S S Morse PhD), and Center for Infection and prevention strategies. New mathematical modelling, diagnostic, communications, and informatics technologies can Immunity (Prof W I Lipkin MD); identify and report hitherto unknown microbes in other species, and thus new risk assessment approaches are Columbia University, needed to identify microbes most likely to cause human disease. We lay out a series of research and surveillance New York, NY, USA; One Health opportunities and goals that could help to overcome these challenges and move the global pandemic strategy from Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of response to pre-emption.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Global Health Security by Embedding the International Health Regulations Requirements Into National Health Systems
    Analysis BMJ Glob Health: first published as 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000656 on 20 January 2018. Downloaded from Strengthening global health security by embedding the International Health Regulations requirements into national health systems Hans Kluge,1 Jose Maria Martín-Moreno,2 Nedret Emiroglu,3 Guenael Rodier,4 Edward Kelley,5 Melitta Vujnovic,6 Govin Permanand7 To cite: Kluge H, ABSTRACT As the leading global organisation with Martín-Moreno JM, Emiroglu N, The International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, as the responsibility for health governance, WHO et al. Strengthening global overarching instrument for global health security, are has bore the brunt of the criticism.5–7 health security by embedding designed to prevent and cope with major international the International Health Depending on the crisis, accusations have public health threats. But poor implementation in countries Regulations requirements hampers their effectiveness. In the wake of a number of ranged from responding too slowly or in ad into national health hoc fashion, to over-reacting and fear-mon- systems. BMJ Glob Health major international health crises, such as the 2014 Ebola 2018;3:e000656. doi:10.1136/ and 2016 Zika outbreaks, and the findings of a number gering, as well as not learning lessons and bmjgh-2017-000656 of high-level assessments of the global response to these not making necessary structural and organ- crises, it has become clear that there is a need for more isational reforms. Proposals for taking the Handling editor Seye Abimbola joined-up thinking between health system strengthening health security agenda forward have thus activities and health security efforts for prevention, alert included reaffirming and strengthening Received 23 November 2017 and response.
    [Show full text]