Actor‐Network Theory for Development
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Iran Human Rights Review: Access to Information
The Iran Human Rights Review, edited by Nazenin Ansari and Tahirih Danesh, is a new Foreign Policy Centre project that seeks to be an important resource for policy makers and activists by combining information and opinion with analysis and recommendations for action. This new edition of the Review focuses on the emergence of access to information as a pivotal element in promoting and protecting the Iranian human IrAN HUmAN rIgHTS rights movement. It contains opinion pieces and detailed articles from a wide range of experts and activists with a focus on promoting a culture of human rights in Iran and the region. Contributors include: Dame Ann Leslie, Nasrin Alavi, Ramin revIew: ACCESS TO Asgard, Shahryar Ahy, Negar Esfandiari, Claudia Mendoza, Saba Farzan, Nazanine Moshiri, Rossi Qajar, Mojtaba Saminejad, Ali Sheikholeslami, Meir Javedanfar, Potkin Azarmehr, Mariam Memarsadeghi. INFORMATION edited by Tahirih Danesh and Nazenin Ansari Preface by Dame Anne Leslie The Foreign Policy Centre Suite 11, Second floor 23-28 Penn Street London N1 5DL United Kingdom www.fpc.org.uk [email protected] © Foreign Policy Centre 2011 All rights reserved Iran Human Rights Review: Access to Information Edited by Tahirih Danesh and Nazenin Ansari Preface by Dame Ann Leslie First published in May 2011 by The Foreign Policy Centre Suite 11, Second Floor 23-28 Penn Street London N1 5DL www.fpc.org.uk [email protected] ©Foreign Policy Centre 2011 All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The Iran Human Rights Review is a platform for a diverse range of opinions. The views expressed in this report are those of their authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Foreign Policy Centre. -
BAGHERI-DISSERTATION-2018.Pdf (1.056Mb)
Copyright by Golsheed Bagheri 2018 The Dissertation Committee for Golsheed Bagheri Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Millenial Iran: Political Disenchantment, Post-Network Society and Commodity Culture Committee: Kamran Aghaie, Supervisor Blake Atwood Benjamin Brower Mary Neuburger Anne Betteridge Millenial Iran: Political Disenchantment, Post-Network Society and Commodity Culture by Golsheed Bagheri Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2018 Dedication For my father Acknowledgements Pursuing the PhD has by far been the most challenging undertaking of my life. I couldn’t have endured this seven-year project without a number of people whom I’ve had the fortune of knowing throughout this endeavor. First and foremost I would like to thank my committee. Thank you, Dr. Aghaie, for serving as my chair—I owe my ability to navigate the academic realm to your guidance, for I have witnessed it grow substantially since the inception of our collegiate relationship. Thank you, Dr. Neuburger for agreeing to serve in my time of need, and thank you, Dr. Brower for your commitment as a reader. I also am incredibly grateful to Dr. Betteridge, whose advice from her time as my thesis chair continues to shape my academic path. Throughout the thirteen years that I’ve had the privilege of your mentorship, I’ve never once left a meeting without feeling utterly inspired and I am so honored that you continue to work with me today. -
Iran Human Rights Review
The Iran Human Rights Review, edited by Nazenin Ansari and Tahirih Danesh, is a new Foreign Policy Centre project that seeks to be an important resource for policy makers and activists by combining information and opinion with analysis and recommendations for action. This new edition of the Review focuses on the emergence of access to information as a pivotal element in promoting and protecting the Iranian human IrAN HUmAN rIgHTS rights movement. It contains opinion pieces and detailed articles from a wide range of experts and activists with a focus on promoting a culture of human rights in Iran and the region. Contributors include: Dame Ann Leslie, Nasrin Alavi, Ramin revIew: ACCESS TO Asgard, Shahryar Ahy, Negar Esfandiari, Claudia Mendoza, Saba Farzan, Nazanine Moshiri, Rossi Qajar, Mojtaba Saminejad, Ali Sheikholeslami, Meir Javedanfar, Potkin Azarmehr, Mariam Memarsadeghi. INFORMATION edited by Tahirih Danesh and Nazenin Ansari Preface by Dame Anne Leslie The Foreign Policy Centre Suite 11, Second floor 23-28 Penn Street London N1 5DL United Kingdom www.fpc.org.uk [email protected] © Foreign Policy Centre 2011 All rights reserved Iran Human Rights Review: Access to Information Edited by Tahirih Danesh and Nazenin Ansari Preface by Dame Ann Leslie First published in May 2011 by The Foreign Policy Centre Suite 11, Second Floor 23-28 Penn Street London N1 5DL www.fpc.org.uk [email protected] ©Foreign Policy Centre 2011 All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The Iran Human Rights Review is a platform for a diverse range of opinions. The views expressed in this report are those of their authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Foreign Policy Centre. -
The 2009 Iranian Presidential Election Protests
Networked Identifications: Constructing Identities and Ideologies in the 2009 Iranian Election Protests Christopher M. Featherman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Sandra Silberstein, Chair Gail Stygall Suhanthie Motha Program Authorized to Offer Degree: English © Copyright 2013 Christopher M. Featherman ii University of Washington Abstract Networked Identifications: Constructing Identities and Ideologies in the 2009 Iranian Election Protests Christopher M. Featherman Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Sandra Silberstein Department of English This dissertation explores the strategic formation of counter-hegemonic discourses during social movements and their rescaling through mobile social media across networked, translocal public spheres. Through an interdisciplinary approach drawing on critical discourse analysis, communication studies, and social movement theory, this qualitative research focuses on the discursive constructions of identities and ideologies during the 2009 Iranian presidential election protests. Examining activists’ discursive tactics in a corpus of Twitter tweets, Flickr photo uploads, and YouTube videos and comparing them with the interdiscursive strategies of U.S. legacy news media texts, I argue that Iranian activists’ use of social media and English add to the micronarratives of vernacular globalization while also calling into question Western master narratives about Iran. I also argue that activists’ reflexive discursive practices and symbolic reentextualizations help form transnational sociomental bonds that strengthen collective actors’ sense of solidarity, though at the risk of informationalizing their borrowed iii discourses and constraining their political stance-taking to the level of affect. While the use of new media in recent social movements has attracted scholarly attention in various fields, much of it has been in quantitative and network-mapping studies. -
Development Informatics
Development Informatics Working Paper Series The Development Informatics working paper series discusses the broad issues surrounding information, knowledge, information systems, and information and communication technologies in the process of socio-economic development Paper No. 51 ICTs and Social Movements under Authoritarian Regimes: An Actor-Network Perspective RICHARD HEEKS & RYOUNG SEO-ZINDY 2013 ISBN: 978-1-905469-32-1 Published Centre for Development Informatics by: Institute for Development Policy and Management, SED University of Manchester, Arthur Lewis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK Tel: +44-161-275-2800/2804 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.manchester.ac.uk/cdi View/Download from: http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/index.htm Educators' Guide from : http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/educdi.htm Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... 1 A. Introduction ............................................................................................. 2 B. Literature Review ..................................................................................... 3 C. Methodology ............................................................................................ 8 D. Case Study of ICTs and Iran’s Green Movement ........................................ 8 D1. PROBLEMATISATION ............................................................................................... -
The Power of 140 Characters? #Iranelection and Social Movements in Web 2.0
Intersect, Volume 3, Number 1 (2010) The Power of 140 Characters? #IranElection and Social Movements in Web 2.0 Alicia Grae Solow-Niederman Stanford University Scholars often discuss the Internet’s social and political impact in extreme terms. The optimistic school celebrates the birth of a new “civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace” (Barlow, 1996), whereas pessimists caution against selling the Internet as a snake oil cure for all kinds of social problems (Noam, 2001). However, assessing the impact of the Internet in such stark terms is misleading, especially in the case of social media and social movements. In moving away from an optimistic versus pessimistic dichotomy, it becomes possible to see that the effects of the Internet may be ambiguous and variable. Specifically, an assessment of the role of the micro-blogging site Twitter during the contested 2009 Iranian presidential election reveals that this social medium assisted in the spread of information and thereby supported democracy by countering the censorship of an authoritarian state, yet simultaneously failed to assist the citizens of an oppressive regime in their actual attempts to mobilize on the ground. The Iranian case suggests that interactions between old and new modes of communication and mobilization, between traditional media and micro-blogging, between on-the-ground protests and online activism, allow a social media site like Twitter to become more than the sum of its tweets and play an important role on the global stage. Setting the Stage Whatever happens today, Iran can never go back. You can’t put this genie back in the bottle.