"Almost Lifeless, Like the Teller": the Instructive Performances of Samuel Beckett's Self-Aware Novels
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“ALMOST LIFELESS, LIKE THE TELLER”: THE INSTRUCTIVE PERFORMANCES OF SAMUEL BECKETT’S SELF-AWARE NOVELS A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Garth Jerome Sabo May, 2011 Thesis written by Garth Jerome Sabo B.A., John Carroll University, 2009 M.A., Kent State University, 2011 Approved by _________Claire Culleton_________, Advisor _________Ronald Corthell________, Chair, Department of English _________Timothy Moerland______, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………..iv Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..1 “That which lurks behind, be it something or nothing” Chapter One………………………………………………………………………...……11 Transparency – Beckett and the Text as Art Chapter Two……………………………………………………………………………...41 Physicality – Beckett and the Text as Object Chapter Three…………………………………………………...............………………..70 Scatology – Beckett and the Text as Fart Chapter Four……………………………………………………………………..………98 Implications – Beckett and the Reader Notes………………………………………………………..…………………………..109 References……………………………………………………..….……….……………123 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Claire Culleton for her assistance in the composition and revision of this thesis. Her words of encouragement and attentiveness were invaluable in the process of this project’s completion. I would also like to thank Dr. Tammy Clewell and Dr. Robert Trogdon for serving on my committee and offering their tacit support through the course of my efforts. Thanks are also due to Dr. Jeanne Colleran, without whom I never would have been introduced to the works of Samuel Beckett. Were it not for the studies of Krapp’s Last Tape and Waiting for Godot she prompted, this thesis would have been impossible. On a personal note, I would like to thank Michelle Rigsby for the support and solidarity she offered. Michelle put up with months of Beckett anecdotes far better than I ever could have anticipated, and I am deeply indebted to her for that. iv INTRODUCTION “THAT WHICH LURKS BEHIND, BE IT SOMETHING OR NOTHING” In the field of Samuel Beckett scholarship, considerable attention has been paid to the apparent meaninglessness of the Beckettian text. Hannah Copeland has stated that “it is the absence, the nothingness at the center of being, that [Beckett] wishes to reveal in his art.”1 Similarly, in his introduction Beckett’s Dying Words, Christopher Ricks asserts that in the Beckettian text, “there is nothing to compare with the ultimate asylum; there is no substitute for nothing.”2 Dirk van Hulle, writing on the topic of Beckett’s manuscript practices, also suggests that Beckett’s writing practices “implied the know-how to create and carefully refine his composition in order to admit the decomposition to become part of it.”3 Even Beckett was willing, even eager, to position himself as an author seeking to say nothing – or, more appropriately, Nothing. In a letter to Axel Kaun, a well respected Beckett critic, Beckett wrote on 9 July 1937: It is indeed getting more and more difficult, even pointless, for me to write in formal English. And more and more my language appears to me like a veil which one has to tear apart in order to get to those things (or the nothingness) lying behind it…It is to be hoped the time will come, thank God, in some circles it already has, when language is best used where it is 1 2 most efficiently abused. Since we cannot dismiss it all at once, at least we do not want to leave anything undone that may contribute to its disrepute. To drill one hole after another into it until that which lurks behind, be it something or nothing, starts seeping through – I cannot imagine a higher goal for today’s writer.4 Beckett goes on to note that “[on] the road toward [a] very desirable literature of the non- word, some form of nominalistic irony can of course be a necessary phase. However, it does not suffice if the game loses some of its sacred solemnity. Let it cease altogether!”5 Beckett thus established for himself the explicit goal of the non-statement; that is, Beckett’s “literature of the non-word”6 limits itself to the face value of its terms. No deeper meaning underlies the Beckett text, owing to Beckett’s suspicion that there is simply nothing lurking behind the veil of language to seep through. It would be a mistake, however, to misinterpret the critical canon and the artist’s own statements as implying an entirely empty experience with the Beckettian text. In the absence of that which lurks behind, Beckett’s writing obsesses with that which cannot be denied – the text itself, the words and performances with which Beckett’s reader interacts moment by moment. The literature of the non-word is still a literature, and as such it continues to embody and follow certain structural constants and conceits. These structural and artistic elements of Beckett’s literature avoid the total deconstruction of the text by asserting that the meaning is wholly contained in the moment of reading; Beckett certainly does not point beyond the text to any deeper meaning, but that is due in part to his satisfaction with the immediate text to convey an artistic experience. In deference to 3 this, Beckett’s works abound in moments that are clearly intended to reify the exact moment of interaction between reader and text. Beckett’s intention at these points seems to be twofold. First, the text supplements itself in meta- or extraliterary ways. That is, in addition to the thematic concerns relevant to the novels’ artistic wholeness, the texts include performative gestures whereby the reader’s response to that which is written is acted out physically or conceptually within the novel. This leads to the second apparent intention of Beckett’s reification of the immediate within the text, which is to instruct the reader in the development of a highly specific, rigid response to novel as intended by Beckett. Beckett may intend for his reader to arrive at Nothing, but it is nonetheless a distinct Nothing he pursues. The text, thus, exerts exacting control over the reader’s possible interpretation and response to it, such that the outward unintelligibility of the Beckett text belies its rigorously enforced authorial presence and control. It is in light of this that I offer the term “instructive performances,” and all reasonable variations thereof, in reference to Samuel Beckett’s early novels. Throughout this thesis, it is my intention to trace and explain the influence of these instructive performances upon the Beckettian text. In so doing, I offer an alternate understanding of Beckett’s non-word. Rather than an empty experience, Beckett is profoundly motivated by the creation of an impossibly rich interaction with the text; he only differs from traditional literature in that he restricts this richness to the immediate moment of reading, with no intention of making a statement that reaches beyond the instant of the text. This awareness of the immediacy of the moment of reading results in a relationship with the texts that transcends the abstract and deconstructionist understanding traditionally 4 proposed by Beckett scholarship. Beckett’s moments of instructive performance in the novels encourage his readers to become subsumed in their progressive experience with his writing. There are certainly moments where Beckett forcefully alienates his reader from the text, but they are offset by the wealth of examples wherein he actively and overtly pursues an intimate relationship with the audience of his novels. I focus specifically on Beckett’s novels because while the issue of self-aware performance in Beckett’s drama has already been addressed admirably, it has been at the expense of a serious contemplation of the performative elements of the novels. In Samuel Beckett’s Self-Referential Drama: The Sensitive Chaos, Shimon Levy’s excellent book on this subject in Beckett’s plays, Levy offers an explanatory example of the typical critics’ dismissal of the novels. Levy asserts, “In Beckett’s prose and poetry a constant quest for the embryonic presence of a self, perhaps as proxy for his own self, can easily be detected; but in his dramatic works the characters need actors as actual ‘proxies’ to provide the necessary vehicle to carry the self.”7 Apparently, Beckett’s prose is ignored due to its self-explanatory clearness in favor of the more attractive complexity of the drama. While it is not my intention to refute this positive impression of Beckett’s dramatic canon, it is a reductive limitation of scholarship to suggest that the novels serve a merely ancillary role in the body of Beckett’s work. “While allowing for methodological modification pertaining to the particular character of the [dramatic] medium dealt with,” Shimon Levy suggests “that self-reference, reflexivity, medium- awareness and notions of an implied author, as well as audience, are all manifestations of a unified artistic course – a course that ensues from Beckett’s expressed artistic self- 5 consciousness.”8 Levy’s examination of these concepts in the drama is inspired and suggests a productive vein for further contemplation in the field of dramatic analysis. However, Levy himself asserts the need for “methodological modification” when dealing with different artistic media, and it is for that reason that the discussion of Beckett’s self- aware novels can no longer be included as a mere subset of the drama. Indeed, Beckett’s paradoxical inclusion of performative elements in the novel, a traditionally non- performative genre, establishes the analysis of this theme as long overdue and profoundly resonant within the scope of Beckett studies. In the interest, then, of applying to the novels the same interest in self-aware performance exemplified by Levy’s book on the drama, I deal at length with Beckett’s first five major novels in this thesis.