DOCSLIB.ORG

Bringing Innovation to Ongoing Water Management – a Better Future Under Climate Change Grant Agreement N° 641739, Research and Innovation Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bringing Innovation to Ongoing Water Management – a Better Future Under Climate Change Grant Agreement N° 641739, Research and Innovation Action Horizon 2020 Societal challenge 5: Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials BINGO Bringing INnovation to onGOing water management – a better future under climate change Grant Agreement n° 641739, Research and Innovation Action Deliverable number: D3.3 Deliverable name: Calibrated water resources models for past conditions Characterization of the catchments and the water systems WP / WP number: WP3: Integrated analysis of the water cycle Delivery due date: Project month 18 (31/12/2016) Actual date of submission: 21/12/2016, revised by 31/05/2018 Dissemination level: Public Lead beneficiary: IWW Responsible scientist/administrator: Tim aus der Beek (IWW) Estimated effort (PM): 27.45 Elsa Alves (LNEC), Tim aus der Beek (IWW), Adriana Bruggeman (CyI), Contributor(s): Corrado Camera (CyI), André Fortunato (LNEC), Paula Freire (LNEC), Ashenafi Seifu Grange (NTNU), Ayis Iacovides (IACO), Iacovos Iacovides (IACO), Erle Kristvik (NTNU), Luca Locatelli (AQUATEC), Paula Lorza (WV), Josep Montes (Ajuntament de Badalona), Marios Mouskoundus (IACO), Tone Merete Muthanna (NTNU), Martin Nottebohm (IWW), Emilia Novo (LNEC), Manuel Oliveira (LNEC), Sjoerd Rijpkema (Vitens), Marta Rodrigues (LNEC), Rui Rodrigues (LNEC), Beniamino Russo (AQUATEC), Pablo Sánchez (AQUATEC), Marc Scheibel (WV), David Sunyer (AQUATEC), Teresa Viseu (LNEC), Bernard Voortman (KWR), Flip Witte (KWR), Georgios Zittis (Cyl) Ajuntament de Badalona: 0.2, AQUATEC: 5; CYI: 2.5; GLD: 0.25; IACO: Estimated effort contributor(s) 1.5; IWW: 1.5; KWR: 0.25; LNEC: 8; NTNU: 3, Vitens: 0.25; WV: 5 (PM): Internal reviewer: Rui Rodrigues (LNEC) Note: This version of D3.3 includes changes implemented in order to address the comments from the review of the second reporting period >> address the comments from the review of the second reporting period. 0 D3.3 – Calibrated water resources models for past conditions Changes with respect to the DoA Not applicable Dissemination and uptake This report is public. Short Summary of results (<250 words) D3.3 – Calibrated water resources models for past conditions was developed by IWW, LNEC, NTNU, KWR, AQUALOGY, CYI, and all local partners within WP3 - Integrated analysis of the water cycle. This Deliverable presents the model applications at all six research sites. Special focus in this Deliverable is being paid to the modelling objectives, the model types, the data used and produced, the model results, as well as the model evaluation and discussion. D3.3 shows the wide variability of models developed and applied in order to bring innovation into water management practices. This is due to the fact that European water problems are diverse and BINGO aims at providing as many solutions as possible to mitigate those climate change related problems. Thus, D3.3 should not be seen as a model intercomparison experiment but as an effort to solve multiple water problems together in a community of scientists, local governments, water suppliers and many more stakeholders. D3.3. is identical with Milestone 16, as the availability of calibrated and working models is essential for the calculation of climate and land-use scenarios. Evidence of accomplishment This report as well as the model output. 1 D3.3 – Calibrated water resources models for past conditions TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... 7 TABLE OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... 15 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 17 2. BINGO Calibrated water resources models for past conditions ............................................. 17 3. Cyprus ........................................................................................................................................... 18 3.1. Peristerona Watershed .............................................................................................................. 18 3.1.1. Model objectives in BINGO ....................................................................................................... 18 3.1.2. Model application ...................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.2.1. Model description .................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2.2. Data ...................................................................................................................................... 21 3.1.2.3. Calibration and validation strategies ..................................................................................... 22 3.1.2.4. Results .................................................................................................................................. 25 3.1.3. Model evaluation and discussion ............................................................................................... 26 3.1.4. Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 28 3.2. Pedieos Watershed ................................................................................................................... 30 3.2.1. Model objectives in BINGO ....................................................................................................... 30 3.2.2. Model application ...................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.2.1. Model description .................................................................................................................. 32 3.2.2.2. Data ...................................................................................................................................... 34 3.2.2.2.1. Parameter input and data of the WDD Hydrologic Model for Pedieos .............................. 34 3.2.2.2.2. Sources and Input data, together with format, spatial and temporal resolution for the BINGO Hydrologic Model for Pedieos watershed ................................................................................................ 39 3.2.2.2.3. Sample Rainfall – Runoff graphs for each of the WRF configuration of the ensemble set 40 3.2.2.3. Calibration and validation strategies ..................................................................................... 47 3.2.2.4. Results .................................................................................................................................. 48 3.2.2.4.1. Results as time series compared to measured data, e.g. runoff ....................................... 48 3.2.2.4.2. Flooding as per the results for each of the Ensemble precipitation configurations ........... 54 3.2.3. Model evaluation and discussion ............................................................................................... 55 3.2.3.1. Evaluation of the goodness of fit of the model ...................................................................... 55 3.2.3.2. Discussion on the model results as presented above ........................................................... 55 2 D3.3 – Calibrated water resources models for past conditions 3.2.4. Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 57 4. Germany ........................................................................................................................................ 59 4.1. Model objectives in BINGO ....................................................................................................... 59 4.2. Model application ...................................................................................................................... 59 4.2.1. Model description ...................................................................................................................... 59 4.2.2. Model set-up .............................................................................................................................. 61 4.2.3. Hydro-meteorological data ........................................................................................................ 66 4.2.4. Calibration and validation strategies .......................................................................................... 68 4.2.5. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 71 4.2.5.1. Upper Große Dhünn .............................................................................................................. 71 4.2.5.2. Dhünn reservoir..................................................................................................................... 72 4.2.5.3. Eifgenbach ............................................................................................................................ 74 4.2.5.4. Linnefe .................................................................................................................................. 76 4.2.5.5. Scherfbach ............................................................................................................................ 77 4.2.5.6. Mutzbach .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Council CNL(14)23 Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken
    Agenda Item 6.1 For Information Council CNL(14)23 Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans for the Calendar Year 2013 EU – Germany CNL(14)23 Annual Progress Report on Actions taken under Implementation Plans for the Calendar Year 2013 The primary purposes of the Annual Progress Reports are to provide details of: • any changes to the management regime for salmon and consequent changes to the Implementation Plan; • actions that have been taken under the Implementation Plan in the previous year; • significant changes to the status of stocks, and a report on catches; and • actions taken in accordance with the provisions of the Convention These reports will be reviewed by the Council. Please complete this form and return it to the Secretariat by 1 April 2014. The annual report 2013 is structured according to the catchments of the rivers Rhine, Ems, Weser and Elbe. Party: European Union Jurisdiction/Region: Germany 1: Changes to the Implementation Plan 1.1 Describe any proposed revisions to the Implementation Plan and, where appropriate, provide a revised plan. Item 3.3 - Provide an update on progress against actions relating to Aquaculture, Introductions and Transfers and Transgenics (section 4.8 of the Implementation Plan) - has been supplemented by a new measure (A2). 1.2 Describe any major new initiatives or achievements for salmon conservation and management that you wish to highlight. Rhine ICPR The 15th Conference of Rhine Ministers held on 28th October 2013 in Basel has agreed on the following points for the rebuilding of a self-sustainable salmon population in the Rhine system in its Communiqué of Ministers (www.iksr.org / International Cooperation / Conferences of Ministers): - Salmon stocking can be reduced step by step in parts of the River Sieg system in the lower reaches of the Rhine, even though such stocking measures on the long run remain absolutely essential in the upper reaches of the Rhine, in order to increase the number of returnees and to enhance the carefully starting natural reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Odenthal Wermelskirchen
    Wermelskirchen X X H H H H H H Odenthal X H H H H Legende H H X Einstiegsort Infostation Station in Planung H Bushaltestelle,Buslinie Parkplatz Gastronomie Wanderweg Wasserroute Eine Kooperation von: mit Unterstützung von: STADT WERMELSKIRCHEN Kulturlandschaften Wanderfischprogramm Eine Kulturlandschaft ist eine durch den Men- Das Wanderfischprogramm Nordrhein-Westfalen Wanderweg schen geprägte Landschaft. Wichtige Faktoren hat die naturnahe Entwicklung ausgewählter für die Entstehung und Entwicklung einer Kul- Fließgewässer zum Ziel, so dass bedrohte Fisch- Wasserroute turlandschaft sind die Beschaffenheit des Natur- arten wie Lachs, Aal oder Maifisch sich wieder raumes, die ursprüngliche Flora und Fauna, die dauerhaft ansiedeln können. Konkret werden menschlichen Einflüsse und die daraus resultie- Maßnahmen zur Gewässerentwicklung ergriffen renden Wechselwirkungen. Das gesamte Dhünn- wie der Bau von Fischwegen, die Uferentfesse- Tal ist der Beleg, dass aber auch eine Kulturland- lung und der Schutz von Laichgebieten. Im Fließ- schaft ständigem Wandel unterliegt. Früher, vor gewässernetz Dhünn-Eifgenbach hat der Wup- Schöllerhof dem Bau der Talsperre, war das Dhünn-Tal ein Ausflugsziele perverband die Durchgängigkeit in den vergangenen Einkehren Beim Anblick des idyllisch in den bergischen Beispiel für ein typisches Mittelgebirgstal mit Interessante Ausflugsziele in der Nähe der Jahren bereits an verschiedenen Stellen wieder- Wandern macht hungrig. Und was gibt es Schö- Wäldern liegenden Schöllerhofes ahnt man ausgeprägter bäuerlicher
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report on the Implementation of the Master Plan Migratory Fish in the Rhine Bordering States 2010-2012
    Progress Report on the Implementation of the Master Plan Migratory Fish in the Rhine Bordering States 2010-2012 Report No. 206 Imprint Publisher: International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) Kaiserin-Augusta-Anlagen 15, D 56068 Koblenz P.O. box 20 02 53, D 56002 Koblenz Telefone +49-(0)261-94252-0, Fax +49-(0)261-94252-52 E-mail: [email protected] www.iksr.org ISBN-Nr 978-3-941994-38-6 © IKSR-CIPR-ICBR 2013 IKSR CIPR ICBR Progress Report on the Implementation of the Master Plan Migratory Fish in the Rhine Bordering States 2010- 2012 Summary ............................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 5 1. Restoration of river continuity and improving spawning and juvenile habitats ........ 7 1.1 Lower Rhine / Delta Rhine ................................................................... 8 1.2 Middle Rhine / Moselle / Northern Upper Rhine ....................................... 9 1.3 Southern Upper Rhine, High Rhine ........................................................ 9 1.4 Hydroelectric power and its effects on the stocks of migratory fish ......... 13 2. Constitution of stocks of endangered migratory fish (habitats and stocking) ........ 14 2.1 Stocking Atlantic salmon and sea trout ................................................ 15 2.2 Monitoring of juvenile fish and natural reproduction of Atlantic salmon and other anadromous migratory fish
    [Show full text]
  • “Master Plan Migratory Fish Rhine 2018”
    “Master Plan Migratory Fish Rhine 2018” - an update of the Master Plan 2009 Report No. 247 Imprint Publisher: International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) Kaiserin-Augusta-Anlagen 15, D 56068 Koblenz P.O. box 20 02 53, D 56002 Koblenz Telefone +49-(0)261-94252-0, Fax +49-(0)261-94252-52 E-mail: [email protected] www.iksr.org © IKSR-CIPR-ICBR 2018 ICPR IKSR ICBR “Master Plan Migratory Fish Rhine 2018” - an update of the Master Plan 2009 - Content 1. Master Plan Objectives .............................................................................. 5 2. Why a Master Plan Migratory Fish Rhine? .................................................... 7 2.1 The life cycle of migratory fish ..................................................................... 7 2.2. Development of salmon stocks in the Rhine .................................................. 8 3. Balance of measures implemented during 2009-2015: What has been achieved so far? ...................................................................................................10 3.1 Results concerning the restoration of river continuity and suitable habitats .......10 3.2 Results of measures aimed at reducing bycatches, illegal catches and predation ............................................................................................................19 3.3 Results of measures protecting downstream migrating fish .............................22 4. Existing and additional measures for the MP 2009 aimed at diadromous migratory fish ........................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROLE of PARTICIPATION in IWRM Final Report Newater Case Study Rhine
    THE ROLE OF PARTICIPATION IN IWRM Final report NeWater case study Rhine Report of the NeWater project - New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty www.newater.info Title THE ROLE OF PARTICIPATION IN IWRM Final report NeWater case study Rhine Purpose Final Report of the Newater case study Rhine Filename D 3.2.7_003.doc Authors Timmerman, Ottow, Lamers, Raadgever, Francois, Möllenkamp, Huesmann, Buiteveld, Isendahl Document history Current version. 3 Changes to previous version. Date Status Final Target readership General readership Correct reference H. Buiteveld (Ed) Rijkswaterstaat, Center for Water Managenent, Lelystad, The Netherlands December 2008 Prepared under contract from the European Commission Contract no 511179 (GOCE) Integrated Project in PRIORITY 6.3 Global Change and Ecosystems in the 6th EU framework programme Deliverable title: The Role of Participation in IWRM. Final report NeWater case study Rhine Deliverable no.: D 3.2.7 Due date of deliverable: Month 48 Actual submission date: Month 48 Start of the project: 01.01.2005 Duration: 4 years Preamble Water managers and policy makers face many challenges. They have to satisfy various, often conflicting demands with limited resources, grapple with uncertainty, particularly that related to climate change, and often lack effective tools to address an array of complex water management issues. Adaptive Water Management (AWM) is an approach to cope with these challenges. It assumes that sustainable management of water resources will only occur if we can increase our capacity to learn from experience and adapt to change and uncertainty. AWM acknowledges the various types of uncertainty that we face: that there is (and will always be) uncertainty on how the different parts of the water system interact, how the system works and how it will change with time.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOSYSTEM SERVICES in the WUPPER CATCHMENT (NORTHRHINE WESTPHALIA, GERMANY) Assessment and Comparison
    MASTER THESIS 10.6.2016 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE WUPPER CATCHMENT (NORTHRHINE WESTPHALIA, GERMANY) Assessment and Comparison A. Kaiser AAU – AALBORG UNIVERSITY, DENMARK IGB – LEIBNIZ-INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND INLAND FISHERIES Aalborg University (AAU) School of Engineering and Science Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H 9220 Aalborg Øst, DK Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) Department II – Ecosystem Research Müggelseedamm 301 Title: 12587 Berlin, GER Ecosystem Services in the Wupper Catchment (Northrhine Westphalia, Germany) –Assessment and Comparsion Author: Alena Kaiser Supervisors: Dr. rer. nat. Morten Lauge Pedersen (AAU) PD Dr. rer. nat. Martin Pusch (IGB) M.Sc. Simone Beichler (Co-supervisor, IGB) Duration: 1st of February 2016 – 10th of June 2016 Number of … Pages: 61 Appendices: 12 Abstract Ecosystem services are defined as the provided and potential functions of an ecosystem which are effectively realized regarding human benefits (Maes et al., 2012). According to Target 2, Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy, member states are requested to map and assess ecosystem services (CBD 2010). In contrast to water quality monitoring, an ecosystem service assessment is not only referring to the state but the actual functions and processes within an ecosystem. The objective of this thesis is to perform an initial assessment of water-related ecosystem services in the Wupper catchment, (North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) which is highly modified by numerous dams. Therefore, the ecosystem service drinking water provision, habitat provision, water purification and tourism & recreation were assessed. The general level of drinking water provision and habitat provision is relatively low, whereas water purification shows slightly higher scores.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Directeur 'Poissons Migrateurs' Rhin 2018
    Plan directeur ‘Poissons migrateurs’ Rhin 2018 - Mise à jour du Plan directeur 2009 - Rapport n° 247 Editeur: Comission Internationale pour la Protection du Rhin (CIPR) Kaiserin-Augusta-Anlagen 15, D 56068 Coblence Postfach 20 02 53, D 56002 Coblence Téléphone +49-(0)261-94252-0, téléfax +49-(0)261-94252-52 Courrier électronique: [email protected] www.iksr.org © IKSR-CIPR-ICBR 2018 IKSR CIPR ICBR « Plan directeur ‘Poissons migrateurs’ Rhin 2018 » - Mise à jour du Plan directeur 2009 - Sommaire 1. Objectifs du plan directeur ........................................................................ 5 2. Pourquoi un Plan directeur ‘Poissons migrateurs’ Rhin ? ................................ 7 2.1 Le cycle de vie des poissons migrateurs ........................................................ 7 2.2 Evolution des peuplements de saumons dans le Rhin ...................................... 8 3. Bilan des mesures réalisées sur la période 2009-2015 : qu'a-t-on atteint jusqu'à présent ? ....................................................................................10 3.1 Bilan du rétablissement de la continuité fluviale et de la restauration d'habitats appropriés .............................................................................................10 3.2 Bilan des mesures de réduction des prises accessoires, des captures illicites et de la prédation ...........................................................................................19 3.3 Bilan des mesures de protection des poissons à la dévalaison .........................22
    [Show full text]
  • Durch Dhünn- Und Eifgenbachtal
    WASSERLAUF Stiftung für Gewässerschutz & Wanderfische NRW WASSERERLEBNISWEGE T O U R 4 DURCH DHÜNN- UND EIFGENBACHTAL Frankfurter Straße 86–88 53721 Siegburg Fon: 02241 308-134 Fax: 02241 308-400 E-Mail: [email protected] www.wasserlauf-nrw.de Bankverbindung: VR-Bank Rhein-Sieg BLZ 370 695 20 Kto. 4107 275 016 WASSERERLEBNISWEGE DURCH DHÜNN- UND EIFGENBACHTAL T o u r 4 DURCH DHÜNN- UND EIFGENBACHTAL ANSPRUCH Anspruchsvolle Tageswanderung. Festes Schuhwerk ist erforderlich, am besten sind Wanderschuhe. Der Weg ist zwar überwiegend gut, jedoch sind vor allem nach Regenfällen matschige Stellen zu passieren. Die Tour ist auch eine schöne Strecke für geübte Mountainbiker! WEGBESCHAFFENHEIT UND BARRIEREFREIHEIT Die Wanderung verläuft größtenteils auf Forstwegen, teilweise befestigt, teilweise unbefestigt. Es sind auch längere Passagen auf Wanderpfaden zurückzulegen. Auf den unbefestigten Forstwegen und Wanderpfaden kann der Boden besonders nach Regenfällen stark aufgeweicht sein. Nur sehr kurze Teilstücke sind asphaltiert. SCHULE UND UNTERRICHT Der Spaziergang eignet sich hervorragend für einen Wandertag an Schulen. Neben der Möglichkeit, Natur und Ökologie von Mittelgebirgsbächen erlebnisorientiert zu vermitteln, bietet die Landschaft auch zahlreiche interessante landes- und kulturgeschichtliche Aspekte. START Wanderparkplatz am Schöllerhof nähe Altenberg ZIEL Wanderparkplatz am Schöllerhof (Rundweg) LÄNGE 14,1 km; 4-5 Std. EINKEHRMÖGLICHKEITEN Zahlreiche Einkehrmöglichkeiten in Altenberg und Burscheid. Entlang des Weges können Sie in der Markusmühle Getränke und Fischgerichte erwerben. ANFAHRT UND PARKPLATZ Mit dem PKW: Verlassen Sie die A 3 auf der Ausfahrt Leverkusen (AS 24) und biegen Sie in Richtung Schlebusch ab. An der Kreuzung mit der B 51 geradeaus auf die K 5, entlang der Waldsiedlung nach Schildgen. In Schildgen Ortszentrum (ansteigende Strasse) links auf die L 101 Richtung Odenthal.
    [Show full text]