DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Benjamin, Dwayne, Loren Brandt, and John Giles. 2011. “Did Higher Inequality Impede Growth in Rural China?” Economic Journal 121 (557): 1281–1309. Berg, Andrew, Jonathan D. Ostry, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer. 2012. “What Makes Growth Sustained?” Journal of Development Economics 98 (2): 149–166. Bourguignon, François. 2004. “The Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle.” Working Paper 125, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi. Christiaensen, Luc, and Lionel Demery. 2007. Down to Earth: Agriculture and Poverty Reduction in Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank. Dang, Hai-Anh, Peter F. Lanjouw, and Umar Serajuddin. 2014a. “Updating Poverty Estimates at Frequent Intervals in the Absence of Consumption Data: Methods and Illustration with Reference to a Middle-Income Country.” Policy Research Working Paper 7043, World Bank, Washington, DC. Dang, Hai-Anh, Peter Lanjouw, Jill Luoto, and David McKenzie. 2014b. “Using Repeated Cross- Sections to Explore Movements in and out of Poverty.” Journal of Development Economics 107: 112–128. Davies, Tim. 2014. “Open Data in Developing Countries-Emerging Insights from Phase I.” Open Data in Developing Countries Working Papers 2. Berlin: World Wide Web Foundation. Demombynes, G., and J. Sandefur. 2014. “Costing a Data Revolution,” Data for Development Viewpoint. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Consensus Center. Dollar, David, Tatjana Kleinberg, and Aart Kraay. 2014. “Growth, Inequality, and Social Welfare: Cross-Country Evidence.” Policy Research Working Paper 6842, World Bank, Washington, DC. Ferreira, Francisco H. G. and Nora Lustig, eds. Forthcoming. “Appraising Cross-National Income Inequality Databases.” Journal of Economic Inequality, Special Issue. Ferreira, Francisco H. G., Phillippe G. Leite, and Martin Ravallion. 2010. “Poverty Reduction Without Economic Growth? Explaining Brazil’s Poverty Dynamics, 1985–2004.” Journal of Development Economics 93: 20–36. Filmer, Deon, and Norbert Schady. 2006. Getting Girls into School: Evidence from a Scholarship Program in Cambodia. Washington, DC: World Bank. Fosu, Augustin Kwasi. 2010. “Income Distribution and Growth’s Ability to Reduce Poverty: Evidence from Rural and Urban African Economies,” UNU–WIDER Working Paper 2010/92, United Nations University, Helinski, Finland. 256 BIBLIOGRAPHY Fox, Louise. 2008. Beating the Odds: Sustaining Inclusion in Mozambique's Growing Economy. Washington, DC: World Bank. Gasparini, Leonardo, Federico Gutiérrez, and Leopoldo Tornarolli. 2005. “Growth and Income Poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from Household Surveys,” CEDLAS, Working Paper 30, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Herzer, Dierk, and Sebastian Vollmer. 2012. “Inequality and Growth: Evidence from Panel Cointegration,” Journal of Economic Inequality 10: 489–503. IEAG (Independent Expert Advisory Group on a Data Revolution for Sustainable Development). 2014. A World That Counts: Mobilising The Data Revolution for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: Independent Advisory Group Secretariat. IEG (Independent Evaluation Group). 2010. Poverty Reduction Support Credits: An Evaluation of World Bank Support. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2011a. Assessing IFC’s Poverty Focus and Results. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2011b. The World Bank’s Involvement in Global and Regional Partnership Programs: An Independent Assessment. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2011c. The World Bank Group's Response to the Global Economic Crisis: Phase I. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2011d. Social Safety Nets: An Evaluation of World Bank Support, 2000–2010. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____.2012a. The World Bank Group’s Response to the Global Economic Crisis—Phase II. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2012b. Liberia Country Program Evaluation: 2004–2011. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. _____.2012c. World Bank Group Impact Evaluations: Relevance and Effectiveness. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____.2013. “Senegal-Country Assistance Strategy for the period FY07–FY10.” Country Assistance Strategy Completion Report Review. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____.2014. Learning and Results in World Bank Operations: How the Bank Learns. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2015. Results and Performance of the World Bank Group 2014. Washington, DC: World Bank. IMF (International Monetary Fund) 2012. “Data Quality Assessment Framework—Generic Framework.”Washington, DC: IMF. Inchauste, Gabriela, Sergio Olivieri, Jaime Saavedra, and Hernan Winkler. 2012. “What is Behind the Decline in Poverty Since 2000,” Policy Research Working Paper 6199, World Bank, Washington, DC. 257 BIBLIOGRAPHY IYCN (Infant and Young Child Nutrition) Project. 2011. Consulting with Caregivers: Formative Research to Determine the Barriers and Facilitators to Optimal Infant and Young Child Feeding in Three Regions of Malawi. Washington, DC: IYCN. Jolliffe, Dean. 2010. Poverty Status in Afghanistan—A Profile Based on the National Risk and Vulnerability Assessment (NRVA) 2007–08. Washington, DC: World Bank. Knowles, Stephan. 2005. “Inequality and Economic Growth: The Empirical Relationship Reconsidered in the Light of Comparable Data.” Journal of Development Studies 41 (1): 135–159. Kraay, Aart. 2006. “When Is Growth Pro-Poor? Evidence from a Panel of Countries.” Journal of Development Economics 80: 198–227. Libresco, Brett, and Thomas O'Brien. 2007. Philippines—Client Perspectives on Elements of World Bank Support. Washington, DC: World Bank Loayza, Norman V., and Claudio Raddatz. 2006. “The Composition of Growth Matters for Poverty Alleviation.” Policy Research Working Paper 4077, World Bank. Lustig, Nora, Omar Arias, and Jamele Rigolini. 2002. “Poverty Reduction and Economic Growth: A Two-Way Causality,” IDB Publications 53919, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC. McKinsey Global Institute. 2011. Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity. Washington, DC: McKinsey Global Institute. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2007. “Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Private Sector Development.” In Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for Donors, OECD, DAC Guidelines and Reference Series, OECD Publishing. OED (Operations Evaluation Department). 2005. 2004 Annual Review of Development Effectiveness: The World Bank's Contributions to Poverty Reduction. Washington, DC: World Bank QAG (Quality Assurance Group). 2003. QAG Assessment Quality of ESW in FY02. Washington, DC: World Bank. Ravallion, Martin. 1997. “Can High Inequality Development Countries Escape Absolute Poverty?” Economics Letters 56: 51–57. _____. 2001. “Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Looking Beyond Averages,” World Development 29(11): 1803–1815. _____. 2007. “Inequality is Bad for the Poor.” In Inequality and Poverty Re-Examined, J. Micklewright and S. Jenkins (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press Ravallion, Martin, and Gaurav Datt. 1996. “How Important to India’s Poor is the Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth?” World Bank Economic Review 10 (1): 1–25. _____. 2002. “Is India's Economic Growth Leaving the Poor Behind?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (3): 89–108. 258 BIBLIOGRAPHY Ravallion, Martin, and Shaohua Chen. 1997. “What Can New Survey Data Tell Us About Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?” World Bank Economic Review 11(2): 357–82. ______. 2007. “China’s (Uneven) Progress Against Poverty.” Journal of Development Economics 82 (1): 1–42. ______.2009. ‘The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on the World’s Poorest.” Vox CEPR’s Policy Portal (blog), April 30. http://www.voxeu.org/article/impact-global-financial-crisis-world- s-poorest Thomson, Anne, Graham Eele, Felix Schmieding. 2013. Independent Evaluation of the International Household Survey Network (IHSN) and Accelerated Data Program (ADP). Final Report. Oxford, UK: Oxford Policy Management. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2004. Unleashing Entrepreneurship: Making Business Work for the Poor. New York, NY: UNDP. Voitchovsky, Sarah. 2005. “Does the Profile of Income Inequality Matter for Economic Growth?: Distinguishing Between the Effects of Inequality in Different Parts of the Income Distribution,” Journal of Economic Growth 10: 273–296. World Bank. 1990. World Development Report 1990: Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press. _____. 2001a. World Development Report (WDR) 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2001b. Romania—Country Assistance Strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2001c. Country Assistance Strategy for the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2001d. Egypt Country Assistance Strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2002a. Poverty in Bangladesh: Building on Progress. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2002b. Peru—Country Assistance Strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2003a. Poverty in Guatemala. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2003b. Senegal—Country Assistance Strategy FY03–06. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2003c. Kyrgyz Republic: Enhancing Pro-poor Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2004a. “Guidance Note on Poverty Assessments.” Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2004b. Papua New Guinea: Poverty Assessment. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2004c. Recession, Recovery and Poverty in Moldova. Washington, DC: World Bank. 259 BIBLIOGRAPHY _____. 2005a. 2004 Annual Review of Development Effectiveness (ARDE): The World Bank's Contributions to Poverty Reduction. Washington, DC: World Bank. _____. 2005b. World Development Report 2006:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Martin Ravallion
    Working Paper Series Are the world's poorest being left behind? Martin Ravallion ECINEQ WP 2015 - 369 ECINEQ 2015 - 369 July 2015 www.ecineq.org Are the world's poorest being left behind?∗ Martin Ravalliony Georgetown University and NBER, U.S.A. Abstract Traditional assessments of economic growth and progress against poverty put little or no weight on increasing the standard of living of the poorest|raising the floor for permanent consumption above the biological minimum. Yet raising the floor is often emphasized by policy makers, moral philosophers and social choice theorists. To address this deficiency, the paper defines and measures the expected value of the floor as a weighted mean of observed consumptions for the poorest stratum. Using data for the developing world over 1981-2011, the estimated floor is about half the $1.25 a day poverty line. Economic growth and social policies have delivered only modest progress in raising the floor, despite progress in reducing the number living near the floor. Keywords: Poverty, consumption floor, Rawls, growth, safety-nets. JEL Classification: I32, I38, O15. ∗For helpful discussions on the topic of this paper and comments on the paper the author is grateful to Francois Bourguignon, Mary Ann Bronson, Cait Brown, Shaohua Chen, Denis Cogneau, Garance Genicot, Peter Lanjouw, Nkunde Mwase, Henry Richardson, Dominique van de Walle and seminar participants at the International Monetary Fund, the Paris School of Economics, the International Labour Organization and the University of Antwerp. yContact details: Department of Economics, Georgetown University, and NBER, Washington DC., 20057, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Issues in Measuring and Modeling Poverty
    UMS165I POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER 1615 Issues in Measuring An extended comment on current practicesin poverty and Modeling Poverty analysis."Mainstream" or even "ideal' current practicesand pressing issuesare discussed Martin Ravallion o he rns on three fronts'. * measurementsof poverty • models of poverty * and data needs. The World Bank PolicyResearch Department Poverty and Human ResourcesDivision June 1996 Poi-ic RESEARCH WORKING PAPER 1615 Summary findings In their research and policy advice related to poverty and It also has implications for the types of models that inequality, says Ravallion,economists have relied heavily on are used to understand the processes that determine household incomiiesor expenditures normalized for poverty and inequality. Not only will there be more differencesin household-specificprices and demographics. dependent variables to consider, but there will also he There are some theoretically sophisticated implementations some potentially complex relationships among of such measures, aimed at deriving "money-metric utility," variables. Low income, for example, is likely to be both although that term is alnost absurdly boastful given how it a cause and an effect of poor health and schooling. The is implemented. BIutrccognizing the conceptual and prospects of escaping poverty may depend greatly on empirical problems that confoutid such measures does not characteristics of the individual, the household, and the mean thar thev should he ignored. Instead, it points to the community. need for supplementary measures to capture the things that These relationships will often be difficult to are missing,including (typically)intrahouselhold inequalities disentangle empirically, although richer integrated and accessto nonmarket goods. and longitudinal data sets offer hopes of doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Should the Randomistas (Continue To) Rule?
    Should the Randomistas (Continue to) Rule? Martin Ravallion Abstract The rising popularity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in development applications has come with continuing debates on the pros and cons of this approach. The paper revisits the issues. While RCTs have a place in the toolkit for impact evaluation, an unconditional preference for RCTs as the “gold standard” is questionable. The statistical case is unclear on a priori grounds; a stronger ethical defense is often called for; and there is a risk of distorting the evidence-base for informing policymaking. Going forward, pressing knowledge gaps should drive the questions asked and how they are answered, not the methodological preferences of some researchers. The gold standard is the best method for the question at hand. Keywords: Randomized controlled trials, bias, ethics, external validity, ethics, development policy JEL: B23, H43, O22 Working Paper 492 August 2018 www.cgdev.org Should the Randomistas (Continue to) Rule? Martin Ravallion Department of Economics, Georgetown University François Roubaud encouraged the author to write this paper. For comments the author is grateful to Sarah Baird, Mary Ann Bronson, Caitlin Brown, Kevin Donovan, Markus Goldstein, Miguel Hernan, Emmanuel Jimenez, Madhulika Khanna, Nishtha Kochhar, Andrew Leigh, David McKenzie, Berk Özler, Dina Pomeranz, Lant Pritchett, Milan Thomas, Vinod Thomas, Eva Vivalt, Dominique van de Walle and Andrew Zeitlin. Staff of the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation kindly provided an update to their database on published impact evaluations and helped with the author’s questions. Martin Ravallion, 2018. “Should the Randomistas (Continue to) Rule?.” CGD Working Paper 492. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Better Global Poverty Measures Martin Ravallion
    Toward Better Global Poverty Measures Martin Ravallion Abstract While much progress has been made over the last 25 years in measuring global poverty, there are a number of challenges ahead. The paper discusses three sets of problems: (i) how to allow for social effects on welfare, recognizing the identification issues involved; (ii) the need to monitor progress in raising the consumption floor above its biological level, in addition to counting the number of people living near the floor; and (iii) addressing the longstanding concerns about prevailing approaches to making inter-country comparisons of price levels facing poor people. Some suggestions are offered for operational solutions, building on past research. JEL Codes: I32, E31, O10 Keywords: Absolute poverty, relative poverty, consumption floor, Purchasing Power Parity, International Comparison Program. Working Paper 417 www.cgdev.org September 2015 Toward Better Global Poverty Measures Martin Ravallion Department of Economics, Georgetown University The author is grateful to Nora Lustig and Jacques Silber for encouraging him to write this paper. For helpful comments the author is grateful to Caitlin Brown, Shaohua Chen, Yuri Dikhanov, John Gibson, Stephan Klasen, Ranjan Ray and Dominique van de Walle. Martin Ravallion. 2015. "Toward Better Global Poverty Measures." CGD Working Paper 417. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. http://www.cgdev.org/publication/toward-better-global-poverty-measures-working- paper-417 Center for Global Development The Center for Global Development is an independent, nonprofit policy 2055 L Street NW research organization dedicated to reducing global poverty and inequality Washington, DC 20036 and to making globalization work for the poor. Use and dissemination of this Working Paper is encouraged; however, reproduced copies may not be 202.416.4000 used for commercial purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Inequality: Concepts and Trends 1
    Poverty and Conflict: The Inequality Link Coping with Crisis Working Paper Series Ravi Kanbur June 2007 International Peace Academy About the Author Ravi Kanbur is T. H. Lee Professor of World Affairs, International Professor of Applied Economics and Management, and Professor of Economics at Cornell University. He has taught at the Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Essex, Warwick, Princeton, and Columbia. Dr. Kanbur has also served on the staff of the World Bank, as Economic Adviser, Senior Economic Adviser, Resident Representative in Ghana, Chief Economist of the African Region of the World Bank, and Principal Adviser to the Chief Economist of the World Bank. Dr. Kanbur's main areas of interest are public economics and development economics. His work spans conceptual, empirical, and policy analysis. Acknowledgements IPA owes a great debt of thanks to its many donors to Coping with Crisis. Their support for this Program reflects a widespread demand for innovative thinking on practical solutions to international challenges. In particular, IPA is grateful to the Governments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. This Working Papers Series would also not have been possible without the support of the Greentree Foundation, which generously allowed IPA the use of the Whitney family’s Greentree Estate for a meeting of the authors of these papers at a crucial moment in their development in October 2006. Cover Photo: Women and children stand on a riverbank near a chemical plant in Mumbai, India.©Rob Lettieri/Corbis. The views expressed in this paper represent those of the author and not necessarily those of IPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series the Idea of Antipoverty
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE IDEA OF ANTIPOVERTY POLICY Martin Ravallion Working Paper 19210 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19210 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2013 For comments the author thanks Robert Allen, Tony Atkinson, Pranab Bardhan, Francois Bourguignon, Denis Cogneau, Sam Fleischacker, Pedro Gete, Karla Hoff, Ravi Kanbur, Charles Kenny, Sylvie Lambert, Peter Lindert, Will Martin, Alice Mesnard, Branko Milanovic, Johan Mistiaen, Thomas Pogge, Gilles Postel-Vinay, John Rust, Agnar Sandmo, Amartya Sen, Dominique van de Walle and participants at presentations at the World Bank, the Midwest International Economic Development Conference at the University of Wisconsin Madison, the Paris School of Economics, the Canadian Economics Association and the 12th Nordic Conference on Development Economics. The paper’s title owes a debt to Gertrude Himmelfarb’s (1984), The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2013 by Martin Ravallion. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Idea of Antipoverty Policy Martin Ravallion NBER Working Paper No. 19210 July 2013 JEL No. B1,B2,I38 ABSTRACT How did we come to think that eliminating poverty is a legitimate goal for public policy? What types of policies have emerged in the hope of attaining that goal? The last 200 years have witnessed a dramatic change in thinking about poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Growth, Urbanization And
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES GROWTH, URBANIZATION AND POVERTY REDUCTION IN INDIA Gaurav Datt Martin Ravallion Rinku Murgai Working Paper 21983 http://www.nber.org/papers/w21983 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2016 For comments the authors thank Frederico Gil Sander and seminar participants at the University of Waikato, New Zealand, and the World Resources Institute, Washington DC. These are the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their employers, including the World Bank, any of its member countries, or the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Gaurav Datt, Martin Ravallion, and Rinku Murgai. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Growth, Urbanization and Poverty Reduction in India Gaurav Datt, Martin Ravallion, and Rinku Murgai NBER Working Paper No. 21983 February 2016 JEL No. I32,O15,O18,O47 ABSTRACT Longstanding development issues are revisited in the light of our newly-constructed dataset of poverty measures for India spanning 60 years, including 20 years since reforms began in earnest in 1991. We find a downward trend in poverty measures since 1970, with an acceleration post-1991, despite rising inequality. Faster poverty decline came with both higher growth and a more pro-poor pattern of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • WEAKLY RELATIVE POVERTY Martin Ravallion and Shaohua Chen*
    WEAKLY RELATIVE POVERTY Martin Ravallion and Shaohua Chen* Abstract—Prevailing measures of relative poverty are unchanged when all such a poverty measure automatically falls when all incomes incomes grow or contract by the same proportion. This property stems from seemingly implausible assumptions about the disutility of relative depriva- grow at the same proportionate rate—which we term tion and the cost of social inclusion. We propose ‘‘weakly relative’’ lines inequality-neutral growth—while any measure based on that relax these assumptions. On calibrating our measures to national pov- strongly relative lines will be unchanged with such a growth erty lines and survey data, we find that half the population of the develop- 4 ing world in 2005 lived in poverty, only half of whom were absolutely process. So it is hardly surprising that this choice has been poor. The total number of poor rose over 1981 to 2005 despite falling num- found to matter greatly to assessments of how poverty is bers of absolutely poor. With sustained economic growth, the incidence of changing over time,5 as well as to cross-sectional poverty relative poverty became less responsive to further growth. The number of 6 relatively poor rose, just as the numbers of absolutely poor fell. comparisons. Two main arguments can be identified in support of strongly relative lines. The first views poverty lines as I. Introduction money-metrics of utility and claims that people attach value to their income relative to the mean in their country of resi- HE methods used to set poverty lines have differed radi- dence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Poor Means Test? Econometric Targeting in Africa
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A POOR MEANS TEST? ECONOMETRIC TARGETING IN AFRICA Caitlin Brown Martin Ravallion Dominique van de Walle Working Paper 22919 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22919 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2016 For their comments the authors thank Arthur Alik-Lagrange, Kathleen Beegle, Mary Ann Bronson, Raphael Calel, Phillippe Leite, Mead Over, Adam Wagstaff and seminar participants at Georgetown University. The authors are grateful to the World Bank’s Strategic Research Program for funding assistance for this research. These are the views of the authors, and need not reflect those of their employers, including the World Bank, its member countries, or the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Caitlin Brown, Martin Ravallion, and Dominique van de Walle. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. A Poor Means Test? Econometric Targeting in Africa Caitlin Brown, Martin Ravallion, and Dominique van de Walle NBER Working Paper No. 22919 December 2016 JEL No. I32,I38,O15 ABSTRACT Proxy-means testing is a popular method of poverty targeting with imperfect information. In a now widely-used version, a regression for log consumption calibrates a proxy-means test score based on chosen covariates, which is then implemented for targeting out-of-sample.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Bank: Why It Is Still Needed and Why It Still Disappoints
    The World Bank: Why It Is Still Needed and Why It Still Disappoints Martin Ravallion Abstract Do we still need the World Bank, given how much the global financial sector has expanded since the institution was founded? The paper argues that there is a continuing role for the Bank and that it is complementary to private finance. But fulfilling that role calls for a significant change in the Bank’s culture. Most fundamentally, knowledge must drive the Bank’s lending—both informing the nature of that lending and learning from it—rather than simply serving lending when called upon. The focus of knowledge generation should be on: (i) identifying and addressing the key country-specific constraints on rapid poverty reduction, and (ii) solving the cross-country coordination problems needed to deal with shared threats. JEL Codes: F35, G21, O19 Working Paper 400 www.cgdev.org April 2015 The World Bank: Why it is Still Needed and Why it Still Disappoints Martin Ravallion Georgetown University In the interest of full disclosure, prior to joining the faculty of Georgetown University in 2013, the author worked for the World Bank for 24 years in a number of sectors and on all regions, and served most recently as the director of its research department. For helpful comments the author thanks Tim Besley, Nancy Birdsall, Michael Clemens, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, Shanta Devarajan, Chico Ferreira, Alan Gelb, Garance Genicot, Manny Jimenez, Ravi Kanbur, Steve Knack, Aart Kraay, Branko Milanovic, Rinku Murgai, Mead Over, Giovanna Prennushi, Martin Rama, Biju Rao, Luis Serven, Lyn Squire, Vinod Thomas, Dominique van de Walle, Nicolas van de Walle, Adam Wagstaff and Bob Zoellick.
    [Show full text]
  • Ravallion, 2014B)
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ARE THE WORLD’S POOREST BEING LEFT BEHIND? Martin Ravallion Working Paper 20791 http://www.nber.org/papers/w20791 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2014 For helpful discussions on the topic of this paper and comments on the paper the author is grateful to Francois Bourguignon, Mary Ann Bronson, Cait Brown, Shaohua Chen, Denis Cogneau, Garance Genicot, Peter Lanjouw, Nkunde Mwase, Henry Richardson, Dominique van de Walle and seminar participants at the International Monetary Fund. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2014 by Martin Ravallion. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Are the World’s Poorest Being Left Behind? Martin Ravallion NBER Working Paper No. 20791 December 2014 JEL No. I32,I38,O15 ABSTRACT The traditional approach to poverty measurement puts no explicit weight on success at increasing the typical level of living of the poorest—raising the consumption floor. To address this deficiency, the paper defines and measures the expected value of the floor, allowing for transient effects and measurement errors in survey data. On using all suitable and available surveys for the developing world over 1981-2011, the expected value of the floor is about half the $1.25 a day poverty line.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Poverty Appraisal: Complementarities, Tensions and the Way Forward*
    Q-Squared - Qualitative and Quantitative Poverty Appraisal: Complementarities, Tensions and the Way Forward* Ravi Kanbur (Editor) Cornell University Email: [email protected] With Contributions by: Ravi Kanbur Robert Chambers Patti Petesch Norman Uphoff Martin Ravallion Francois Bourguignon David Sahn Caroline Moser Christopher Barrett David Booth Vijayendra Rao Luc Christiaensen Jesko Hentschel Paul Shaffer Rosemary McGee Ronald Herring Gary Fields Alex Wilks Erik Thorbecke Q-Squared Working Paper No. 1 October 2005 * This volume originally appeared as: Cornell University Applied Economics and Management Working Paper 2001-05, May, 2001. Q-squared • Centre For International Studies • University Of Toronto 1 Devonshire Place, Toronto ON M5S 3K7 Canada t: 416-885-7721 • f: 416-652-1678 • e: [email protected] CONTENTS Q-SQUARED? A COMMENTARY ON QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE POVERTY APPRAISAL RAVI KANBUR 1 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE POVERTY APPRAISAL: THE STATE OF PLAY AND SOME QUESTIONS RAVI KANBUR 16 QUALITATIVE APPROACHES: SELF CRITICISM AND WHAT CAN BE GAINED FROM QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES ROBERT CHAMBERS 21 THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS? ROBERT CHAMBERS 25 SELF-CRITICISM AND OBSERVATIONS ON THE WAY TO FINISHING VOICES OF THE POOR: FROM MANY LANDS PATTI PETESCH 29 BRIDGING QUANTITATIVE-QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN POVERTY APPRAISAL: SELF-CRITICAL THOUGHTS ON QUALITATIVE APPROACHES NORMAN UPHOFF 32 CAN QUALITATIVE METHODS HELP QUANTITATIVE POVERTY MEASUREMENT? MARTIN RAVALLION 37 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO POVERTY ANALYSIS: TWO PICTURES
    [Show full text]