Title of Dissertation BAPTISM and REBAPTISM in the METHODIST
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 Title of Dissertation BAPTISM AND REBAPTISM IN THE METHODIST CHURCH OF SOUTHERN AFRICA: A CRITICAL INVESTI GATION INTO THE VIABILITY OF POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES By OSWIN GARNET KRETZMANN Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Master of Theology by Thesis only in the School of Religion and Theology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg June 2011 2 DECLARATION Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Theology in the Graduate Programme of Systematic Theology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. I declare that this dissertation/thesis is my own unaided work. All citations, references and borrowed ideas have been duly acknowledged. It is being submitted for the degree of Master of Theology in the Faculty of Humanities, Development and Social Sciences, Pietermarizburg, South Africa. None of the present work has been submitted previously for any degree or examination in any other University. OSWIN GARNET KRETZMANN Student Name 27 June 2011 Date PROFESSOR A. BALCOMB Name of Supervisor ___________________ Signature 3 C O N T E N T S Page Introduction and Summary 4 Chapter One Origins of rebaptism 14 Chapter Two The Methodist Church of Southern Africa’s Position 58 on Baptism and Rebaptism Chapter Three Questions around Forbidden Practices 84 Chapter Four Possible Remedial Steps that could be taken by the 92 Methodist Church of Southern Africa Chapter Five Remedial Steps taken by the Methodist Church of 117 Southern Africa Chapter Six Alternative Rites and Practices and their Viability 129 Chapter Seven Research Findings and Conclusion 157 A Conclusion and Recommendation 160 Appendix I 165 Bibliography 172 4 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY The Methodist Church of Southern Africa (MCSA) practices baptism within in the Reformed tradition according to a covenant understanding, and strives to be one and undivided in an inclusive ethos. The practice of rebaptism or repeat baptism is a threat to its unity. The formulation and availability of viable alternative rites could be a compromise gesture, which may enable unity to be facilitated and fostered in the “one baptism” (Eph.4:5) in the church. These rites may go towards circumventing requests for rebaptism. PRINCIPAL THEORIES UPON WHICH THE RESEARCH PROJECT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED O.A. Hallesby makes the following claim in respect of water baptism “Christ has instituted neither adult baptism nor infant baptism – he has instituted baptism….Jesus has not said (or commanded) when and where the act should be ministered and who should be baptised – (and even how it should be administered) – that he left to the Church” (Hallesby O, 1964:19) Hallesby’s statement can be understood as a reference to the “adiaphorous” nature of Christian baptism and points to the need to study baptism along this line in an attempt to address the practice of rebaptism which the Methodist Church of Southern Africa regards as problematic. According to the Formula of Concord drawn up in 1577 adiaphora are “Church rites which are neither commanded nor forbidden in the word of God”. The approach intended for this study to take could be put under this rubric. Baptism per se is a rite practised by all Christian churches. However it is practised in different ways in different christian traditions. What this study will attempt to do is to examine the different theologies used to justify these practices and suggest a dialogical way forward. The Lutheran Augsburg Confession states that for “the true unity of the church, it is enough to agree concerning the doctrine of the gospel and the administration of the sacraments, and that it is not necessary that human traditions, that is rites and ceremonies, instituted my men, should everywhere be alike”. (Pages 2 and 3, article from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wikii/Adiaphora) . If this is the case, and in the light of what Hallesby claims about baptism, it seems obvious that any one form of baptism claimed to be the only true form of baptism is questionable. A study of baptism according to the adiaphoric line would call for liberty in debate and of charitable compromise in regard to the formulation of acceptable alternative rites. The MCSA could justifiably use this line as a counter for the practice of rebaptism as the theoretical approach to be used in this study. As a starting point it is necessary to provide a biblical basis for the adiaphoric nature of baptism. A superficial examination of all the scripture references on baptism in the bible, of which there are 75, reveals that most of them are didactic, descriptive and exhortative in nature. All are therefore open to debate and this is evident from the fact that they can be and have been variously interpreted. This 5 outcome is another sign of baptism’s adiaphorous quality. Matthew 28:19-20 is the only statement of baptism by Jesus in the New Testament which is prescriptive and is used by all Christian denominations as the basis for their view of Christian baptism and how it should be practiced. It gives the impression of being non-adiaphorous because it is presented in a prescriptive way, and yet it is not clear as to what Jesus was specifically commanding in the commission of the text. It appears that the MCSA uses the adiaphorous theoretical line when it comes to baptism. It upholds covenant and deems it to be inclusive. This inclusive spirit comes through the oft-repeated colloquial saying in Methodism that the MCSA is a “roof, which covers many opinions” and in its invitation for “ministers to explore the formation of alternative rites” (MCSA Minutes 1989:67) This study will attempt to arrive at a position of “unity in diversity” in respect of the practice of water baptism. This attempt is based on the “puritan” theoretical ideal as a basis which is expressed in the often quoted saying, “in necessary things, unity, in doubtful things, liberty, in all things, charity”. The value of this approach lies in the possibility of finding an outcome, which, as divisive as the issue of baptism may be, is possible to highlight the inclusive nature of the “one baptism” that Ephesians 5 talks about and could help to facilitate movement in that direction. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY This research will rely heavily on a wide range of literature both old and new for general information and more specifically will seek for material on critical issues surrounding baptism and rebaptism. The MCSA has invited its ministers to explore alternative baptismal rites, (MCSA Minutes of conference, 1989:67) and while this call is dated, nevertheless gives the researcher an opportunity to investigate the opinions and positions of other members of the Methodist clergy. A questionnaire letter was sent therefore to 40 Methodist ministers randomly across the culture spectrum as a way of testing in a superficial way whether the issue of rebaptism is still a troublesome matter in the church. The books listed in the bibliography will form the basis of the literature review. The MCSA church archives accommodated in the Cory Library at Rhodes University Grahamstown will be searched for relevant material covering the debate as it has unfolded in the church in decades gone by. The ‘Laws & Discipline of the M.C.S.A.’, Minutes of Conferences, letters of controversy, objection, support and debate around the central issues and related issues of baptism, and re-baptism will be specifically examined. Attempts will also be made to find relevant materials in the church’s monthly newspaper, ‘Dimension’ dating back to 1970. Catechisms of various Christian denominations will be studied and in particular John Wesley’s work on baptismal theology and policy. The Internet will also be a scoured 6 for information. And importantly the asking of relevant questions which always form the basis of any research endeavour will be asked. An initial question to be addressed is around whether rebaptism is a current problem issue in the MCSA. Rebaptism has not featured on the agenda of the church’s synods and Conferences since 1990. This could be a sign that rebaptism has become a non-issue. On the other hand there are indications that issues around baptism are very much alive for individual ministers and members, as well as in some pastoral constituencies. My own experience coming from speaking to individuals and groupings of people both inside and outside of the MCSA, and from giving lectures on the Methodist understanding together with questions raised, has confirmed that baptism is still a troublesome matter despite remedial steps taken by the church. These steps will be discussed later in this work. It has been said that members and ministers are nervous to speak about a matter that is deeply sensitive in the MCSA and over which there has been so much controversy. Is the issue then not best left alone? The answer is no, particularly as the problem of rebaptism has not been completely resolved in the MCSA and continues to wreak havoc in all sorts of ways. In 2009 I did some informal empirical research in which I sent out a questionnaire to a cross-section of Methodist ministers which asked several pertinent questions. Only one of the 22 responses received was concerned about the issue of confidentiality, while the others did not wish their responses to be kept anonymous. The reason why the results of this questionnaire were excluded from the original draft of this thesis was that my supervisor was initially of the opinion that it would complicate the study from an ethical clearance perspective. However, in the light of the report from the external examiner and in discussion with my supervisor it has become clear that it is necessary to include a sample of the questionnaire with the responses received, and these are still in my possession.