DOCSLIB.ORG

Tree Farm and FSC: Family Forests' Dynamic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tree Farm and FSC: Family Forests' Dynamic 20 Woodland ManageMent • SuMMer 2011 Tree Farm and FSC: Family Forests’ Dynamic Duo by Paul Pingrey he American Tree Farm System Tand the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) are often viewed as competitors for the allegiance of family forest own- ers. In fact, the two are strong comple- ments, together forming a compelling set of education, marketing and landowner engagement tools. Tree Farm, with its familiar green and Paul Pingrey photo white sign, has been around since 1941. The Forest Stewardship Council is a Forest certification audits involve specialists from many disciplines. The man with his hand in the air is Mike Ferrucci, a Tree Farm-SFI auditor. The man on the left holding his glasses relative newcomer, established in 1993. is Dr. Robert Hrubes, an FSC auditor. Both now offer third-party forest certi- fication recognition to private woodland consisting of about 98 percent of MFL tainable rates without reforestation. Our owners in the United States who follow family forest participants who volun- forebears had an offhand attitude toward responsible forest management stan- tarily agree to abide by additional for- forests, but the resource was not endless. dards developed by the two organiza- est certification rules. In 2008, the MFL Alarm over the long-term implications tions. While Tree Farm and FSC share Group became dual certified by both resulted in birth of the American Tree similarities, they are different in ways Tree Farm (a program of the American Farm System in 1941. The concept of that can lend strength to both. Forest Foundation) and FSC. The MFL “farming” was chosen to symbolize a Many Wisconsin Woodland Owner As- Group is the largest certified family for- commitment to the land, a simple idea sociation (WWOA) members are right- est organization in the world. that could be readily grasped by a coun- fully proud to be certified Tree Farmers. The Wisconsin experience is proving try with roots in agriculture. A woodland WWOA and the Wisconsin Tree Farm that the Tree Farm-FSC duo is strong, owner who sensibly manages for “wood, Committee have a longstanding working promoting a new vision of responsible water, wildlife and recreation” can be relationship encouraging family forest forestry and giving family forest owners recognized as a Tree Farmer. Those four certification through the Tree Farm pro- a growing edge in global markets. Some tenets, which basically embody the theo- gram. A number of prominent WWOA people wonder how Wisconsin’s Tree ry of ecosystem management, help U.S. members have been recognized as Na- Farm-FSC synergy works and whether family forest owners fulfill their objec- tional and Regional Outstanding Tree both are truly important for family forest tives for the land. Farmers of the Year, making Wisconsin owners. Anyone who is associated with Tree forestry admired around the country. In essence, the American Tree Farm Farm, however, knows that the organiza- About 42,000 Wisconsin Tree Farms System was the first forest certifica- tion’s primary objective has never been also found their way into the program tion program—albeit originally with- “certification”—that is, assurance to through Wisconsin’s Managed For- out the kinds of third party verification outside interests that sound practices are est Law (MFL) Group. MFL is a state required by certification programs like followed. Rather, Tree Farm is primarily property tax incentive administered by FSC. Early in the last century, conser- a program of landowner education, rec- the Department of Natural Resources. vation leaders realized that America’s ognition and advocacy for policies that The “MFL Group” is a subset of MFL private forests were being cut at unsus- are beneficial to family forest owners. It Woodland ManageMent • SuMMer 2011 21 is designed to motivate landowners and move them down a path (no matter how humble the beginnings) to be respon- sible—and sometimes even outstand- ing—land managers. For participants, Tree Farm networks share not only ideas but also friendships. As a result, loyalty among active Tree Farmers can be pow- erful, leading to skepticism about newer players like FSC. The Forest Stewardship Council’s ori- gins and mission are different than Tree Farm’s. FSC was chartered after the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. Rainforest ex- ploitation, not temperate forest manage- ment, was the driving concern. FSC is an international organization of forest own- ers, timber industries, social groups and environmental organizations seeking to identify credible, well-managed forests as sources of responsibly grown and har- vested forest products. Proving claims of responsible sourcing to outside interests (i.e., stakeholders)—businesses and con- Paul Pingrey photo sumers rather than to forest owners—is FSC’s primary function. They also work Certification auditors (center) and DNR foresters confer during a MFL field audit in Crawford County. Pictured left to right are Arvid Haugen (DNR), Kathy Nelson (DNR), on an international scale, FSC being a Professor Steve Grado (FSC Auditor), Scott Berg (Tree Farm auditor) and Gary Harden global standard. (DNR Forester). The landowner can sell these logs as “FSC Pure.” The fact that so many poor and devel- oping countries around the world lack be built to make a sustainable structure. training and use what they learn. the environmental, social and economic FSC participants can use local resource To help make the FSC standard appli- institutions enjoyed by developed na- management guidance material, but they cable to “smaller” family forest owner- tions like the U.S. makes writing FSC need to compare it with FSC indicators ships less than 2,500 acres in size, the standards more challenging. Even in and take steps to plug the drafts. The FSC-US Board activated a set of “family the U.S., however, concerns over forest FSC-US standard is more prescriptive forest indicators” in July of 2010. Their management inconsistencies resulted in because stakeholders were not comfort- effect is about a 20 percent reduction in a new 110-page U.S. forest management able with the range of variation that can the number of indicators that auditors standard released in 2010. It aims for a result from relying on local guidance need to look at on family forest lands uniform measure of quality regardless of without doing a quality assurance check. because the risk of nonconformance is what state forests are in. For the Wisconsin MFL Group, the considered low. Monitoring and some The American Tree Farm standard differences between Tree Farm expecta- other requirements are also less formal weighs in at about six pages, but there’s tions and those of FSC are minimal be- for family forestlands. However, audi- more to it than meets the eye. The Tree cause MFL begins with a fairly high bar. tors still need to evaluate any indicators Farm standard is analogous to a post and There are gaps, but they haven’t been that they suspect might risk being out of beam construction. Tree Farm provides difficult to address. For example, state compliance. a framework and roof and then turns to and federal pesticide use laws allow the Marketing assurance based on a state-level Best Management Practices, sale of some chemicals that the FSC comprehensive standard supported by federal and state laws, and local silvi- standard considers highly hazardous environmental activists and industry, culture norms to fill in the walls, win- because they are persistent and can get social groups, and landowners, then, is dows, doors, plumbing, etc. The written into the water supply. Wisconsin DNR a strength of FSC. That contrasts with documentation a forester considers when takes measures to ensure that landown- Tree Farm’s power in motivating land- writing a Tree Farm plan is actually quite ers and commercial applicators do not owners through education and social extensive and technical. use the FSC banned products on MFL networking. Good as it may be, however, The framework FSC starts with is very Group lands. Both Tree Farm and FSC FSC marketing can fail if an insufficient similar to Tree Farm’s. Instead of rely- have higher expectations than MFL that number of landowners adopt the stan- ing as much on state and local guidance, loggers work safely, and so again DNR dard and there isn’t enough FSC product however, FSC defines more about how takes extra efforts to inform landown- to sell. Tree Farmers, on the other hand, the walls, windows, doors, etc. should ers and encourage loggers to get safety would be much better off if businesses 22 Woodland ManageMent • SuMMer 2011 sought their timber more actively. Tree News search and you’ll be flooded with Treasure Forest Association, which is Farm does not market any forest prod- other current events. A recent look turned going through a FSC group certification ucts under its own trademark. While up group forest certification efforts in review in November 2010. the American Forest Foundation is hav- Viet Nam, Ukraine, China, Indonesia The next in line for 2011 is likely to be ing some success promoting Tree Farm and other far- flung places that, because an Appalachian landowner association wood through partner Sustainable For- of global markets, are direct competitors in Virginia designing a carbon seques- est Initiative (SFI) and other programs, with Wisconsin’s family forests for a tration-group certification program. And those forest certification brands have not share of green markets. there are more in the works. been as successful as FSC. Whether we appreciate it or not, the Considering the relative strength of While forest certification has not yet most substantial and very real economic the American Tree Farm System in the resulted in price premiums in Wisconsin, benefit of having certified wood (not to South, it should not come as a surprise it has promoted market access (as your mention environmental and social im- if they, too, look at how Tree Farm and local paper mill can attest).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • News from the Virginia Tree Farm Foundation By: John Matel, Virginia Tree Farm Foundation
    News from the Virginia Tree Farm Foundation By: John Matel, Virginia Tree Farm Foundation New certification fees I have been a certified Tree Farmer since I bought my first forest land in 2005. Being a certified Tree Farmer is important to me. In fact, it is so important that I have served as the President of the Virginia Tree Farm Foundation (VTFF) for the past 4 years. Until now, this program has been free in Virginia, even as many other states instituted various fees. However, now Virginia will be following suit. Starting January 1, current Virginia Tree Farmers will be billed a certification fee of $50 per year per Tree Farm. The VTFF recognizes that some people own multiple Tree Farms so there is a maximum fee. No Tree Farmer will pay more than $250 per year, no matter how many individual Tree Farms they own. New Tree Farms will be assessed a one-time certification fee of $100, which will cover initial costs plus their first year of Tree Farm certification. These fees will be used to cover administrative expenses associated with the VTFF, offer better service to Tree Farmers, and allow for more outreach and educational opportunities. Something new: Landscape Management Plans Virginia has been chosen to pilot a Landscape Management Plan (LMP). The LMP will cover all counties east of, and those including, Route 29. The LMP will allow for more planning at the landscape, rather than at the individual property, scale. Tree Farmers may opt to have their own management plan; however, they will also have the option of using the LMP.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Christmas Tree Production Manual
    PB 1854 Tennessee Christmas Tree Production Manual 1 Tennessee Christmas Tree Production Manual Contributing Authors Alan B. Galloway Area Farm Management Specialist [email protected] Megan Bruch Leffew Marketing Specialist [email protected] Dr. David Mercker Extension Forestry Specialist [email protected] Foreword The authors are indebted to the author of the original Production of Christmas Trees in Tennessee (Bulletin 641, 1984) manual by Dr. Eyvind Thor. His efforts in promoting and educating growers about Christmas tree production in Tennessee led to the success of many farms and helped the industry expand. This publication builds on the base of information from the original manual. The authors appreciate the encouragement, input and guidance from the members of the Tennessee Christmas Tree Growers Association with a special thank you to Joe Steiner who provided his farm schedule as a guide for Chapter 6. The development and printing of this manual were made possible in part by a USDA specialty crop block grant administered through the Tennessee Department of Agriculture. The authors thank the peer review team of Dr. Margarita Velandia, Dr. Wayne Clatterbuck and Kevin Ferguson for their keen eyes and great suggestions. While this manual is directed more toward new or potential choose-and-cut growers, it should provide useful information for growers of all experience levels and farm sizes. Parts of the information presented will become outdated. It is recommended that prospective growers seek additional information from their local University of Tennessee Extension office and from other Christmas tree growers. 2 Tennessee Christmas Tree Production Manual Contents Chapter 1: Beginning the Planning ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ramping up Reforestation in the United States: a Guide for Policymakers March 2021 Cover Photo: CDC Photography / American Forests
    Ramping up Reforestation in the United States: A Guide for Policymakers March 2021 Cover photo: CDC Photography / American Forests Executive Summary Ramping Up Reforestation in the United States: A Guide for Policymakers is designed to support the development of reforestation policies and programs. The guide highlights key findings on the state of America’s tree nursery infrastructure and provides a range of strategies for encouraging and enabling nurseries to scale up seedling production. The guide builds on a nationwide reforestation assessment (Fargione et al., 2021) and follow-on assessments (Ramping Up Reforestation in the United States: Regional Summaries companion guide) of seven regions in the contiguous United States (Figure 1). Nursery professionals throughout the country informed our key findings and strategies through a set of structured interviews and a survey. Across the contiguous U.S., there are over 133 million acres of reforestation opportunity on lands that have historically been forested (Cook-Patton et al., 2020). This massive reforestation opportunity equals around 68 billion trees. The majority of opportunities occur on pastureland, including those with poor soils in the Eastern U.S. Additionally, substantial reforestation opportunities in the Western U.S. are driven by large, severe wildfires. Growing awareness of this potential has led governments and organizations to ramp up reforestation to meet ambitious climate and biodiversity goals. Yet, there are many questions about the ability of nurseries to meet the resulting increase in demand for tree seedlings. These include a lack of seed, workforce constraints, and insufficient nursery infrastructure. To meet half of the total reforestation opportunity by 2040 (i.e., 66 million acres) would require America’s nurseries to produce an additional 1.8 billion seedlings each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Timber Tree Farm Group Invitation to Join
    Green Timber Tree Farm Group Invitation to Join The American Tree Farm System® (ATFS) has established a program called the American Tree Farm Program, Group Certification. Green Timber Consulting Foresters, Inc. has formed the Green Timber Tree Farm Group in order to offer these services to our present and future clients. If you are interested in long-term sustainable forest management on your property, then this program is for you. ATFS Group Certification has a number of benefits that accrue to the individual Group Members, Group Organizations of family forest owners, and the customers of wood and paper products. These benefits generally include facilitating the flow of information to landowners, maintaining market access, improving forest management practices, reducing the overall costs of forest certification for landowners, and assuring customers and the public that landowners are practicing sustainable forestry. In addition, Group Members enjoy all of the rights and benefits of individual Tree Farmers. Benefits of Joining a Tree Farm Group 1. Recognition of Practicing Certified Forest Management 2. Right to Sell Forest Products from Your Property as Third Party Certified 3. Increased Access to Forestry Information 4. Right to Display the Tree Farm Sign 5. One year subscription to Tree Farm Magazine 6. Invitation to Attend the National Tree Farm Convention 7. Potential Cost Reductions for Other Natural Resource Programs Requiring 3rd Party Certification 8. Potential Eligibility for Natural Resource Programs Requiring 3rd Party Certification Please Review the Enclosed Information 1. Eligibility Requirements 2. Membership Application 3. Mutual Understanding Form Additional information can be found at www.greentimberforestry.com and/or www.treefarmsystem.org.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Tree Farm System Celebrated Its 70Th Anniversary
    In 2011, the American Tree Farm System celebrated its 70th anniversary. After a controversial beginning, it is now an important player in efforts to mitigate climate change. The American Tree Farm System GROWING STEWARDSHIP FROM THE ROOTS “ ill the thing before it spreads,” U.S. Forest Service Chief Lyle Watts allegedly declared. Watts and his assistant C. Edward Behre tried to kill the thing in K 1941. They failed, and it spread from the West, into the South, and eventually all across America. The “thing” was the American Tree Farm System (ATFS), which is now 71 years old and America’s oldest family-owned federal regulation is certainly not to its discredit,” according to woodland sustainability program, covering more than 26 million the journal. privately owned acres. Why were Watts and Behre against tree farms in 1941? PUSH FOR FEDERAL REGULATION Encouraging private owners to grow continuous crops of trees The strong push for federal regulation of forestry had begun in (as tree farming was defined) probably was not abhorrent to them. the 1930s, during America’s Great Depression. Federal forestry What they disliked was substituting private cooperation for public leaders believed that they should closely regulate the private sector, regulation. They saw tree farming as a move to decrease pressure and many people agreed. The National Industrial Recovery Act for federal regulation. of 1933, for example, had authority to coordinate major industries Watts and Behre asked the Society of American Foresters to to set prices, working conditions, and (in the case of forest indus- question the ethics of members who participated in tree farming.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Save the Rainforest from Deforestation
    HOW TO SAVE THE RAINFOREST FROM DEFORESTATION BY: AUDREY BAGOT, AVA POWELL, EMMA EDMONDS WHAT IS PALM OIL? PALM OIL IS AN OIL THAT COMES FROM PALM FRUITS PALM OIL IS A INGREDIENT IN SOME OF YOUR FAVORITE FOODS AND OTHER POPULAR PRODUCTS. PALM OIL SADLY IS A THREAT TO THE RAINFOREST. ALSO IT IS A THREAT TO THE ANIMALS THAT LIVE THERE. PRODUCTS THAT CONTAIN PALM OIL • LITTLE DEBBIE NON SUSTAINABLE • GIRL SCOUT COOKIES NON SUSTAINABLE • CLIFF BAR SUSTAINABLE • NERDS SUSTAINABLE • MILKY WAY SUSTAINABLE • HERSHEY REECE'S PIECES SUSTAINABLE DEFORESTATION CYCLE STEP ONE THEY BURN DOWN THE RAINFOREST, KILLING PLANTS AND ANIMALS. DEFORESTATION CYCLE STEP TWO THEY CLEAR THE RAINFOREST FLOOR. CATTLE CAN GRAZE ON THE LAND OR THEY CAN START A PALM TREE FARM TO GET PALM OIL. DEFORESTATION CYCLE STEP THREE THEY KILL THE CATTLE TO MAKE BURGERS OR STEAK AND THEN SELL IT. THEY CAN ALSO GET FRUIT FROM PALM TREE FARM AND GET THE PALM OIL FROM THAT. THEN THEY SELL THE PALM OIL TO COMPANIES. HOW YOU CAN HELP STOP DEFORESTATION YOU CAN HELP STOP DEFORESTATION BY, NOT BUYING FOODS/PRODUCTS WITH PALM OIL, ESPECIALLY FOR HALLOWEEN. YOU CAN ALSO HELP BY, TELLING OTHER PEOPLE ABOUT PALM OIL LIKE HOLDING A LEMONADE STAND. YOU CAN JOIN ORGANIZATIONS LIKE KIDS AGAINST PALM OIL AS WELL. GOLDEN LION TAMARIN THE GOLDEN LION TAMARIN LIVES IN THE RAINFOREST. THEY ARE THREATENED BY THE DEFORESTATION CYCLE. IN A FEW YEARS TAMARINS MAY HAVE NO HOME. THIS IS ONE OF THE HUNDREDS OF ANIMALS THAT NEED YOUR HELP. HERE IS A WEBSITE TO LEARN MORE HTTPS://REDAPES.ORG/ADOPT LEMONADE STANDS AND BAKE SALES WE HELD A LEMONADE STAND AND BAKE SALE.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Farm Category Definitions
    Updated October 2017 Categories of Tree Farm Participation Current Categories Certified or Recognition Tree Farm The Certified/Recognition Tree Farm category is the highest level of participation in the program. This category requires landowners to meet the current AFF Standards of Sustainability and ATFS Eligibility Requirements and remain subject to routine inspections after required initial inspection. Pioneer Tree Farm The Pioneer Tree Farm category allows interested landowners, who may not quite meet the AFF Standards of Sustainability, but meet the ATFS Eligibility Requirements, to participate in the American Tree Farm System. The Pioneer category also serves as a corrective action category for landowners who were found through an inspection or other contact to be out of conformance with the Standards and program requirements. Tree Farms out of conformance may be assigned to the Pioneer category if the landowners are committed to taking the steps necessary to bringing their management into conformance. The goal of the Pioneer Tree Farm category is to provide landowners an opportunity to work towards being a Certified or Recognized landowner, whether they are new to the Tree Farm system or were previously participating but must update their management. Pioneer status can be an introductory level of participation in the program, however, is not a mandatory starting point for Tree Farmers meeting all requirements of the ATFS program. Landowners meeting the AFF Standard should be considered for ATFS Certification/Recognition. Prospect Tree Farm The Prospect Tree Farm category is for properties that could potentially become Certified/Recognized based on the expressed interest of the landowner. The property has not yet received an inspection to be enrolled in the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Dendrochronology Worksheet
    Dendrochronology Name Period Dendrochronology is the study of growth rings in trees for the purpose of analyzing past climate conditions or determining the dates of past events. Because trees grow more slowly in periods of drought or other environmental stress than they do under more favorable conditions, the size of the rings they produce varies. Analyzing the pattern of a tree's rings provides information about the environmental changes that took place during the period in which it was growing. Matching the pattern in trees whose age is known to the pattern in wood found at an archaeological site can establish the age at which the wood was cut and thus the approximate date of the site. By comparing living trees with old lumber and finding overlapping ring patterns, scientists have established chronological records for some species that go back as far as 9,000 years. Core samples are often taken from living trees or cut wood, so the wood can continue to be used.! When was the fire? (Marked by **) The year of the fire: _ _ _ _ Use these core sample simulations to determine the date of the fire marked with a **. Sample 1: From a living tree from the Pinetown Forest, July 1993 at ___ years old. Sample 2: From a tree in the Pinetown Christmas Tree Farm in the year _ _ _ _ at ___ years old. ! ! Sample 3: From a log on the main trail in Pinetown Forest, cut in the year _ _ _ _ at ___ years old. Sample 4: From a barn beam in Pinetown Hollow.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Your Woodlands: a Template for Your Plans for the Future
    Managing Your Woodlands: A Template for Your Plans for the Future Owner(s) Name(s) ___________________________________________________________________________ Owner(s) Mailing Address(es) ________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Owner(s) Phone Number(s) __________________________________________________________________ Owner(s) Email(s) ___________________________________________________________________________ Owner(s) _________________________________________________________________________ Signature(s)_________________________________________________________________________ Plan Author _________________________________________________________________________ Plan Author Mailing Address ________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Plan Author Phone Number __________________________________________________________________ Plan Author Email ___________________________________________________________________________ Plan Author Signature _______________________________________________________________________ Date of Original Plan Completion ______________________ Revision date(s)______________________ Please note: Informal
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Forest Trees in Indigenous Farming Systems As
    Global Journal of HUMAN SOCIAL SCIENCE Geography & Environmental GeoSciences Volume 12 Issue 13 Version 1.0 Year 2012 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA) Online ISSN: 2249-460x & Print ISSN: 0975-587X The Role of Forest Trees in Indigenous Farming Systems as a Catalyst for Forest Resources Management in the Rural Villages of Cross River State, Nigeria By Ajake, Anim O. University of Calabar Abstract - The concern of humanity is the need to tackle the increasing challenges of severe degradation of the forest ecosystem and its resources. The study examined the critical role of forest tree species in indigenous farming systems on the management of forest resources in the rainforest villages of Cross River State, Nigeria. The participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) method, household questionnaire survey, field inventory and measurement were used to generate the required data. The data were analyzed using statistics such as simple percentage, mean, standard deviation, tables, graphs, charts and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The study result indicated that the practice of tree felling during land preparation for farming is a minority attribute of the study population. 69.91 percent of the people allow trees on farmlands during land clearance, while 31.09% are found in tree-felling. Keywords : forest management, farming systems, inventory, resources, tree retention, sustainability. GJHSS-C Classification : FOR Code : 070504 The Role of Forest Trees in Indigenous Farming Systems as a Catalyst for Forest Resources Management in the Rural Villages of Cross River State, Nigeria Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of: © 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Starting a Christmas Tree Farm in CNY
    Cornell Cooperative Extension of Chenango County 99 N. Broad St., Norwich, NY 13815 Phone: 607-334-5841, Fax: 607-336-6961 Starting a Christmas Tree Farm in CNY Every good farm starts with planning. Christmas tree farms are no exception. Before you plant even one tree, you have some serious decisions to make about time, labor and marketing. How will this farming enterprise effect your time and budget. Remember, although Christmas tree farming does not require the amount of constant care some operations do, there is still a lot of work to be done: List of activities: Soil preparation, planting of new seedlings, shearing, weed control, pest scouting and control, fertilizing, harvesting, selling, and marketing (year-round activity). Marketing is a year round activity, you could have the best trees in the world and no one will buy them if they don’t know where to find you (or the trees) or if they cost too much. Take some time to explore your market options before you plant. Sales methods (you can have for a mixture of the three): Wholesale- sell to a secondary retailer, less money per tree, but your time is cut down by not selling directly to the public. You-Pick- invite potential customers out to your land to choose which tree they would like before the tree is cut. You can get a higher asking price per tree, as well as save inventory (only the trees that will be sold will be cut). Retail- Sell your own pre-cut trees at a roadside stand, local business, or on your own property.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Arborist Fall 2007 a Message from the President
    FloridaFlorida Arborist A Publication of the Florida Chapter ISA Volume 10, Number 3, Fall 2007 www.floridaisa.org Fall 2007 In This Issue: Boron Deficiency in Palms Boron Deficiency In Palms 1 By Dr. Timothy K. Broschat Professor, Environmental Horticulture Department President’s Message 2 University of Florida In the News 3 This document is 6 of a 6 part series covering nutritional deficiencies in palms. (Nitrogen Deficiency in Summer 2006, Potassium Deficiency in Fall 2006, Magnesium Deficiency in Winter ISA Research Award: 2006, Iron Deficiency in Spring 2007 and Manganese Deficiency in Summer 2007). Dr. Ed Gilman 8 Symptoms Pruning Pointers 10 Boron (B) deficiency causes a wide array of symptoms, not only among species of palms, but Why Topping Hurts Arborists 12 also within a single species. Symptoms always occur on newly emerging leaves, and remain Tree Fund Update 12 visible on these leaves as they mature and are replaced by younger leaves. One of the earliest symptoms of B deficiency on Dypsis lutescens (areca palm) and Syagrus romanzoffiana Crime Prevention Through (queen palm) is transverse translucent streaking on the leaflets. In many species including Environmental Design 14 Cocos nucifera (coconut palm), Elaeis guineensis (African oil palm), and S. romanzoffiana, Florida Chapter mild B deficiency is manifested as sharply bent leaflet tips, commonly called “hookleaf”. Board Updates 20 These sharp leaflet hooks are quire rigid and cannot be straightened out without tearing the Right Tree Right Place: leaflets. In some species, these “hooks” drop off. It’s The Law in Florida 20 CTLA’s Role in Revising Another symptom associated with chronic B deficiency in S.
    [Show full text]