DOCSLIB.ORG

The King Edward Vii Professorship of English Literature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The King Edward Vii Professorship of English Literature THE KING EDWARD VII PROFESSORSHIP OF ENGLISH LITERATURE FACULTY OF ENGLISH 1 The Professorship Background The King Edward VII Professorship has fallen vacant as a result of the retirement of Professor David Trotter, who succeeded Gillian Beer and previous holders, Marilyn Butler and Frank Kermode. The Faculty has three other established Professorships in the Faculty: the Professorship of English (currently held by Professor Stephen Connor), the Professorship of English 2000 (currently held by Professor John Kerrigan) and the Professorship of Medieval and Renaissance Literature (currently held by Professor Nicolette Zeeman). The Professorship is a Crown appointment made on the recommendation of an Advisory Committee convened by the University. Selection Criteria Candidates will be considered for the Professorship on the basis of the following selection criteria, which they should address in their application. An outstanding research record of international stature in English Literature. The vision, leadership experience and enthusiasm to build on current strengths in maintaining and developing a leading research presence, and an established record in attracting research grant support to further this development. The ability to further the academic planning and strategic development of English Literature in the University and, where appropriate, to facilitate its development within the UK. The ability to manage and interact effectively with staff and students at all levels. An enthusiastic commitment to the recruitment, training and mentoring of the next generation of researchers, including undergraduates, research students, and postdoctoral research fellows Candidates will hold a PhD or equivalent postgraduate qualification. King Edward VII Professorship of English Literature Page 1 of 6 2 The Faculty of English The Faculty of English currently has 48 University Teaching Officers (UTOs), all of whom are required to provide undergraduate and graduate teaching, undertake and publish research, examine at undergraduate and graduate level, and undertake Faculty administration. In addition, 48 College Teaching Officers (CTOs) are members of the Faculty whose teaching obligations are primarily owed to the Colleges which employ them. The Faculty currently has almost 200 graduate students and over 650 undergraduates. There is one formally constituted department in the Faculty, with its own head of department, the Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic. The Faculty as a whole is co-ordinated by the Faculty Board of English which elects a Chairman to serve for a set period. The Faculty is located at 9 West Road in a modern building opened in October 2004. The building provides a library, teaching and research facilities and offices for University Teaching Officers; it also provides space for the Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse, and Celtic and some colleagues from the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. The Faculty is active in all major areas of English literature, and in English language for literary studies. It is rated as excellent for the quality of its teaching, and of its research by the Quality Assurance Agency and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. It was awarded 4* 34%, 3* 48%, 2* 16%, 1* 2% in the 2014 Research Excellence Framework. The English Tripos at Cambridge consists of a two-year Part I, which introduces undergraduates to a wide range of literature in English from 1300 to the present day, and to a variety of literary critical methods; and a one-year (or in some cases two- year) Part II, which offers an extensive choice of options in addition to compulsory papers on Tragedy and Practical Criticism and a compulsory dissertation. Teaching for both parts of the Tripos is conducted through lectures, classes and ‘supervisions’ (i.e. tutorials). Supervisions are given by College Teaching Officers and by University Teaching Officers in their role as Fellows of Colleges. The Faculty teaching programme is planned by Subject Group Committees (SGCs) which include all appropriate UTOs and CTOs as members. SGCs take responsibility for papers falling within a particular period or subject area. At graduate level, supervision of doctoral students is undertaken by members of the Faculty in a wide range of fields. Areas of research interests of individual members of the Faculty may be found on the Faculty’s website. There are M.Phil courses in Medieval and Renaissance literature, Romanticism and 18th Century literature, Criticism and Culture, American Literature and Modern and Contemporary Literature. King Edward VII Professorship of English Literature Page 2 of 6 3 Standard Duties Teaching and research The Professor will be required to deliver lectures and give instruction in English Literature and in particular to perform the following duties: (i) to give at least 30 lectures or classes per annum; (ii) to undertake original work and the general supervision of research and advanced work in his/her subject and Faculty, and to assist students in their studies by supervision or informal instruction. Examining The Professor will be required to undertake such university examining as may be required by the Faculty Board. Supervision The Professor will be required to act as the supervisor of graduate students as and when requested. Administration Administrative duties are shared equitably among the teaching members of the Faculty. The postholder would be expected to play a significant role by taking their turn in the senior offices of the Faculty, including Chair of the Faculty Board, Chair of the Degree Committee, and Research Officer, as well as from time to time being a member of Faculty Committees dealing with such matters as planning and resources, academic and other appointments, admission of graduate students, research and teaching. There is also an encouragement to accept appointment to University Committees. 4 The Colleges The University, the Faculties and Departments, and the Colleges are linked in a complicated historical relationship that is mutually beneficial but not simple. Students (both graduate and undergraduate) are admitted by one of the 31 Colleges, although in the case of graduate students the Faculties and Departments determine admissions before the Colleges are involved. Almost all undergraduates, and many graduate students, live in a College. The teaching of undergraduate students is shared between the Colleges and the Faculties and Departments, with the Colleges arranging small group teaching (“supervision”) and the Departments providing lecturing, laboratory classes, and advanced supervisions. Most academic staff will also be invited to join a College as a teaching or professorial fellow. College teaching is remunerated separately from the University teaching, and appointment to a College is a separate matter from a University appointment. Membership of a College adds an important social and intellectual dimension for many of the academic staff. The Chair of the Faculty or senior colleagues can give more advice. King Edward VII Professorship of English Literature Page 3 of 6 5 Procedure for Appointment The appointment will be made by the Crown on the recommendation of an Advisory Committee chaired by the Vice-Chancellor or his Deputy, with a membership which includes members of the Faculty, members of cognate Faculties and external experts. All applications will be acknowledged. The Advisory Committee will decide how they wish to proceed towards making an election, which may include interviews and/or presentations. Short-listed candidates may be invited to visit the Faculty to give a seminar on their work and meet prospective colleagues in the course of the process. Candidates will be informed of the progress of their applications as agreed by the Committee. It is anticipated that the successful candidate will take up the appointment on 1 October 2018 or as soon as possible thereafter. 6 Enquiries and Applications Informal enquiries about this Professorship may be directed to Professor Peter de Bolla, Chair of the Faculty of English, Cambridge, telephone +44 (0)1223) 767299 or email [email protected]. Further information on the University is available at the following address: www.cam.ac.uk. Applications, consisting of a letter of application together with a statement of current and future research plans, a curriculum vitae and a publications list, should be made online no later than 22 November 2017. If you are unable to apply online, please contact the Human Resources, University Offices, The Old Schools, Cambridge, CB2 1TT (email [email protected]). King Edward VII Professorship of English Literature Page 4 of 6 GENERAL INFORMATION All appointments to University Offices are subject to the Statutes and Ordinances of the University. A Salary Salary on appointment will be determined by the Vice-Chancellor at the appropriate point on the University’s salary spine for grade 12, taking account of the criteria for the respective contribution band. Professorial salaries are reviewed periodically, on the basis of research, teaching and general contribution, by the Vice-Chancellor with the assistance of a small Advisory Committee. There is a normal sabbatical entitlement of one term in seven on full pay, subject to the University regulations. B Headship of the Department Should a Professor be appointed to the Headship of a Department, a pensionable payment in addition to salary is made. C Recruitment Incentive The University has a scheme whereby a single recruitment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Translation Or Transformation? the Relations of Literature and Science
    Translation or Transformation? The Relations of Literature and Science Gillian Beer Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 44, No. 1. (Jan., 1990), pp. 81-99. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0035-9149%28199001%2944%3A1%3C81%3ATOTTRO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London is currently published by The Royal Society. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/rsl.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Literature: Reflections on Interdisciplinarity and Modes of Knowledge Sowon S Park University of Oxford, Faculty of English, UK [email protected]
    Science and Literature: Reflections on Interdisciplinarity and Modes of Knowledge Sowon S Park University of Oxford, Faculty of English, UK [email protected] The joint field of ‘science and literature’ has been gaining increasing prominence in the last two decades, charting new grounds beyond the divided landscape of the ‘two cultures’. Of our increasingly border-crossing research culture, no field provides a better example than cognitive literary criticism. Though still relatively young, this area has already produced a body of work that is extremely wide-ranging in both scale and explanatory scope, illustrating through its very organization the possibilities of multidisciplinary enquiry. This paper will examine interdisciplinarity with reference to evolutionary literary criticism, a sub-field within cognitive literary criticism; a scrutiny of the political and ideological implications that follow from basing an account of literature on adaptive value will be given followed by a discussion of the historical lineaments of the science/literature debate. Keywords: science / culture / literature / cognitive literary criticism / evolutionary criticism / interdisciplinarity UDK 82.0:001.3 I The joint field of ‘science and literature’ has been gaining increasing prominence in the last two decades or so, charting new ground beyond the divided landscape of the ‘two cultures’. The MLN signaled this spirit of constructive interdisciplinary exchange in their special issue entitled Literature and the History of the Sciences (2003), which announced
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76711-8 - Romantic Tragedies: The Dark Employments of Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Shelley Reeve Parker Frontmatter More information ROMANTIC TRAGEDIES Troubled politically and personally, Wordsworth and Coleridge turned in 1797 to the London stage. Their respective tragedies, The Borderers and Osorio, were set in medieval Britain and early modern Spain to avoid the Lord Chamberlain’s censorship. Drury Lane rejected both, but fifteen years later, Coleridge’s revision, Remorse, had spectacular success there, inspiring Shelley’s 1819 Roman tra- gedy, The Cenci, aimed for Covent Garden. Reeve Parker makes a striking case for the power of these intertwined works, written against British hostility to French republican liberties and Regency repression of home-grown agitation. Covertly, Remorse and The Cenci also turn against Wordsworth. Stressing the significance of subtly repeated imagery, as well as resonances with Virgil, Shakespeare, Racine, Jean-Franc¸ois Ducis, and Schiller, Parker’s close readings – boldly imaginative and decidedly untoward – argue that at the heart of these tragedies lie powerful dramatic uncertainties driven by unstable passions, what he calls (adapting Coleridge’s phrase for sorcery) “dark employments.” reeve parker is Professor of English Emeritus at Cornell University, and is also a life member of Clare Hall, University of Cambridge. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76711-8 - Romantic Tragedies: The Dark Employments
    [Show full text]
  • MSA Programme with ROOMS ALLOCATED, July 18
    Thursday 8.00 – 5.00 MSA Executive Board Meeting 213 AND 214 FULTON 12.30 – 2.30 Pre-Conference Workshops W1 - DIGITAL APPROACHES TO VERSIONING AND VISUALISING MODERNISM G23 JUBILEE Stephen Ross (University of Victoria) J. Matthew Huculak (University of Victoria) W2 - MODERNISM FOR THE MASSES G22 JUBILEE Helen Sword (University of Auckland) W3 - WYNDHAM LEWIS: TOWARDS A COLLECTED, COMPLETE EDITION (PRIVATE MEETING) 103 FULTON Paul Edwards (University of East Anglia) W4 - WHAT DO JOURNALS WANT? (1.00 START) 104 FULTON Susan Stanford Friedman, University of Wisconsin-Madison (editor, Contemporary Women’s Writing) Ann Ardis, University of Delaware (editor of Modernism/Modernity) Peter Boxall, University of Sussex (editor, Textual Practice) Deborah Longworth, University of Birmingham (editor and founder, Modernist Cultures) Douglas Mao, Johns Hopkins University (former senior editor, English Literary History) W5 - WHAT DO PRESSES WANT (FROM A FIRST BOOK)? (1.00 START) G155 JUBILEE Rebecca L. Walkowitz, Rutgers University (co-editor and co-founder, Literature Now book series, Columbia University Press) Jacqueline Baker, Oxford University Press (U.K.), Commissioning Editor for Literature Rebecca Beasley, The Queens College, Oxford University (co-editor, Edinburgh Studies in Modernist Culture, Edinburgh University Press) Kevin J. H. Dettmar, Pomona College (co-editor and co-founder, Modernist Literature and Culture book series, Oxford University Press [US]) David James, Queen Mary, University of London (co-editor and co-founder, Literature Now
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Studies in the Nineteenth Century
    Recent Studies in the Nineteenth Century Jon Mee SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, Volume 53, Number 4, Autumn 2013, pp. 913-940 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/sel.2013.0040 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/sel/summary/v053/53.4.mee.html Access provided by Harvard University (18 Jul 2014 00:24 GMT) JonSEL 53,Mee 4 (Autumn 2013): 913–960 913913 ISSN 0039-3657 © 2013 Rice University Recent Studies in the Nineteenth Century JON MEE This essay does not offer anything that could purport to be an overview of recent studies in the nineteenth century. Readers who wish to deduce trends may count for themselves whatever theme or issue they wish to quantify from the list of “works received” that follows. Of course, there will anyway always be a degree of randomness to the books sent to the review editors of any jour- nal, but I am going to indulge my own professional prejudice toward what is called—unsatisfactorily, and perhaps increasingly unsatisfactorily—“the Romantic period,” or worse, “Romanticism.” As readers might expect from someone who has just taken up a chair in eighteenth-century studies, my nineteenth century may have quite a few decades of the eighteenth in it, and not so many of the later decades of the Victorian. Even so, I begin by discuss- ing a book devoted, if not entirely, to the Victorian period, and so default on my own default in order to bring out what seem, to me at least, some key issues for current research in the nine- teenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Gillian Beer's Landmark Book Demonstrates How Darwin
    Cambridge University Press 0521783925 - Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction, Second Edition Gillian Beer Frontmatter More information Gillian Beer’s landmark book demonstrates how Darwin overturned fundamental cultural assumptions by revising the stories he inher- ited, how George Eliot, Thomas Hardy and other writers pursued and resisted the contradictory implications of his narratives, and how the stories he produced about natural selection and the strug- gle for life now underpin our culture. This second edition of Darwin’s Plots incorporates an extensive new preface by the author and a foreword by the distinguished American scholar George Levine. ‘The only problem with this book is deciding what to praise first. It draws on a breadth of knowledge in many fields, its literary readings are alert and original, it has a profound grasp of idea and form. It must be read by the scientist, the student of Victorian thought and art and the educated person in the street . The book is so exciting as a work of literary criticism – among much else – that it must provoke and disturb old interpretations and judgements.’ Barbara Hardy, New Statesman. ‘. Gillian Beer’s superb study ...a work of criticism that takes its modest place among the other “cloudy triumphs” of English genius.’ Michael Neve, Sunday Times. ‘Offers fresh insights into familiar themes in the history of science by dealing with them in quite a new way.’ John Durant, The Times Literary Supplement. Gillian Beer is King Edward VII Professor of English Literature at the University of Cambridge and President of Clare Hall, Cam- bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reader As Author
    The Reader as Author GILLIAN BEER Contributor: Dame Gillian Beer is King Edward VII Professor Emeritus at the University of Cambridge and a former President of Clare Hall. She is a Fellow of the British Academy and of the Royal Society of Literature as well as an invited member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the American Philosophical Society. A number of universities have given her honorary doctorates including Oxford, the Sorbonne, Harvard and St. Andrews. Her books include Darwin's Plots (third edition, CUP, 2009), Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter (Oxford University Press, 1996), Virginia Woolf: the Common Ground (Edinburgh University Press, 1996) and Jabberwocky and Other Nonsense: the collected and annotated poems of Lewis Carroll (Penguin Classics, 2012). She is General Editor of Cambridge Studies in Nineteenth Century Literature and Culture. In Milton’s great seventeenth-century epic poem Paradise Lost both God and Satan are described as ‘author’. As the story of creation is re-told God is called ‘author and end of all things’ while elsewhere Satan is ‘the author of all ill’. The difference is marked: Satan can start things but not control their outcome; God is the aim as well as the origin. His authorship describes an arc from initiation to willed conclusion. Human authors are much more like Satan than God: they can start things but not control consequences. Once the book is published it goes out of their control, into the anonymous realm of the reader. Publishing, making public, both inscribes the name of the author in the work (if he or she wishes) and yields it up.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Woolf and the Sciences of Prehistory: a Study of Five Major Novels – Korrakod Paetsasadee – June 2019 Acknowledgements
    Virginia Woolf and the Sciences of Prehistory: A Study of Five Major Novels Korrakod Paetsasadee This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2019 Department of English Literature and Creative Writing 1 Word Template by Friedman Morgan& 2014 For my parents i Word Template by Friedman Morgan& 2014 ii Word Template by Friedman Morgan& 2014 Declaration This thesis has not been submitted in support of an application for another degree at this or any other university. It is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated. Many of the ideas in this thesis were the product of discussion with my supervisor Mr. Tony Pinkney. iii Word Template by Friedman Morgan& 2014 Abstract This thesis examines Woolf’s major novels and other writings in relation to the discourses of science in her period. As a modernist writer, she has been considered as anti-science and an advocate of formalist aesthetics. A later literary-critical generation constructed her as a feminist writer, at once robust and subtle in her polemics and experimental techniques. But Woolf also consistently expressed her interest in a variety of sciences including natural history and biology, palaeontology, physics, psychoanalysis, technology, astronomy, archaeology and anthropology. By examining her diverse scientific interests, particularly as they cluster around the notion of prehistory, this thesis examines in detail five of her major novels. Her first novel The Voyage Out sets forth, in the light of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, on the mission of creating a new self and a language suitable for women’s use to express their subtle experiences and elusive attitudes to society.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernist Fables and the Vitality of Style
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2015 Virtuoso Beasts: Modernist Fables and the Vitality of Style Cliff Mak University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the American Literature Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, Literature in English, North America Commons, and the Modern Literature Commons Recommended Citation Mak, Cliff, "Virtuoso Beasts: Modernist Fables and the Vitality of Style" (2015). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1093. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1093 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1093 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Virtuoso Beasts: Modernist Fables and the Vitality of Style Abstract This dissertation examines the pivotal function of animals in modernist writing, particularly where modernist style confronts inherited moral codes. Classic accounts of modernism emphasize â??impersonalityâ?? as the prime method for artists seeking cultural and ethical authority in the period after 1880. This project digs into what I argue is ultimately the more palatable capacity of literary beasts to animate a similar poetics of authority. Where doctrines of impersonality often resorted to figures of the inorganic in order to simultaneously disavow and indulge the expression of authorial intention, modernists such as Gerard Manley Hopkins, Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, Rudyard Kipling, and Marianne Moore instead avowed their didactic ambitions by appealing not to traditional expressive and explicit methods nor, on the other hand, to the complete evacuation of personality, but to the vitality and instinct of animals. More than any platinum filament (T.S. Eliotâ??s famous catalyst), animals offered modernists a vocabulary for the bodily and behavioral mechanisms by which individuals become ethical and historical subjects.
    [Show full text]