The Land Story – Crofton/Ngaio Methodist Presbyterian and Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Land Story – Crofton/Ngaio Methodist Presbyterian and Union 1 THE LAND STORY – CROFTON/NGAIO METHODIST PRESBYTERIAN AND UNION CHURCHES The Crofton/Ngaio Methodist, Presbyterian and Union land story covers the earliest aspects of Maori history of the area, the initial sales to the New Zealand Company, and a brief resume of subsequent occupants, purchasers, titles and building in order to answer the key questions posed by the Connexion. The story of the groups who planned and used the churches is told fully in First a church... the continuing story of Ngaio Methodist, Presbyterian and Union Churches by Elaine E Bolitho, published December 2004 by the Ngaio Union Church. Ngaio Union’s parish boundaries also include the former Cashmere Methodist Community Centre (111 Cashmere Avenue, Khandallah) demolished in 2001. The story of this property, and its regeneration as the Cochran Hall at the Cashmere Avenue School is told in the Cashmere Land Story, and in The Vision Restored, published by Ngaio Union Church in May 2003. Ngaio Union, as the legal successor to the proceeds held in trust from the Cashmere land sale, was granted funding for approved capital work on the Ngaio Union property, thus ensuring that in 2005 all buildings were fully compliant. Contents Key Questions asked in Our Land Story The successive tangata whenua of Te Whanganui-a-Tara Tracing the division of the land, the titles and the owners (A) Methodist (B) Presbyterian Copies of Certificates of Title References NGAIO UNION CHURCH Ngaio Union Church July 2004 2 KEY QUESTIONS ASKED IN OUR LAND STORY Information Leaflet No 46, November 1991 How was the land originally obtained from the Maori people? Was the land purchased? In September 1839, Colonel William Wakefield, on behalf of the New Zealand Company, purchased the whole area of Te Whanganui-a-Tara (the Wellington Harbour) and the surrounding ranges for goods worth £400. This was known as the Port Nicholson purchase. Translators Dicky Barrett and Ngati were engaged to explain the deed of sale and the New Zealand Company’s land reserve system, whereby Maori would be granted one tenth of the land. Actually it was a case of one Maori section allocated for every ten settler sections — an eleventh. The sale was negotiated with Te Ati Awa chiefs, Te Wharepouri (who had been living at Ngauranga since 1836) and Te Puni (living at Petone), who saw the sale as a means of establishing the bounds of the recently migrated Te Ati Awa and Taranaki people. (For more detail about the earlier Maori activities in the area see the supplementary information in pages 6- 8 concerning the successive tangata whenua of Te Whanganui-a-Tara.) The ALEXANDER TURBULL LIBRARY PUBL —001 1-02-1 New Zealand Company’s proposal that The Maori chief Te Wharepouri. every “tenth” section would be set aside for Maori use gave rise to the term Wellington Tenths. Did the purchase have tribal consent? The majority of the previous Te Whanganui-a-Tara occupants — Ngati Tama and Ngati Mutunga (who may have intermarried with earlier Ngati Ira residents) — migrated to the Chatham Islands on board the Rodney. “In terms of traditional tenure, Ngati Mutunga had established an unchallenged right to large areas of the harbour, and this right they had formally transferred to Taranaki and Te Ati Awa in November 1835.” (Ballara p 30) 3 In 1835 Ngati Mutunga, by panui (announcement), made over their lands from Petone to Ngauranga (north east side) to their Te Ati Awa kinsman Te Matangi (later baptised Rawiri) and to his son Te Manihera Te Toru. These two cousins of Te Puni and Te Wharepouri had been living with Ngati Mutunga since 1832. When Wakefield moved on to Cloudy Bay, in the Marlborough Sounds, he was told that the land he had bought did not belong to the Te Ati Awa chiefs to sell, but that it belonged to Ngati Toa. He then negotiated a sale with Ngati Toa chiefs, including Te Rauparaha for a much wider area, but still including Te Whanganui-a-Tara. The Kapiti deed was supported by a second deed executed by Te Ati Awa in Queen Charlotte Sound on 8 November 1839. Both conveyed 20 million acres of land between the same extreme boundaries, centred on Cook Strait. In 1839, when the New Zealand Company first arrived in Port Nicholson, a remnant of Ngati Tama, who had not migrated to the Chatham Islands, were still living in a very damp pa at the mouth of the Kaiwharawhara Stream. Led by Te Kaeaea (Sparrow Hawk) — a huge, impressively tattooed man — they had travelled south from North Taranaki with Te Ati Awa in 1832. Te Rauparaha and Te Rangihaeata gave the Ngati Tama people a hard time and ridiculed their leader by giving him the nickname Taringa Kuri (Old Dog’s Ear). In warm valleys inland from their pa, Ngati Tama were growing wheat, potatoes, maize and kumara — crops which would later help feed the growing settler population. Ngati Tama people would also build houses for settlers, sell firewood to them and, for sixpence, carry one across the Kaiwharawhara Stream Upstream along the track known today as Old Porirua Road, in a bush clearing, lay a potato ground in the area of today’s Trelissick Crescent in Ngaio. ONSLOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY REED BOOKS Te Kaeaea, also known as Taringa Kuri outside his sleeping house at the Kaiwharawhara Pa — painting by GF Angas. 4 Te Kaeaea — who had a warlike reputation — agreed to sell land, including the inland gardens, but feared Maori would lose mana by doing so. Using the name Taringa Kuri he signed the Treaty of Waitangi on board ship in the harbour on 29 April 1840. By this time a number of chiefs were repudiating the sale made by Te Wharepouri and Te Puni. How does the purchase stand in relation to the Treaty of Waitangi? The initial purchases were completed prior to the Treaty which embodies, in clause 2, a preemptive ruling concerning land sales. Backing this was Governor Hobson’s Land Titles Proclamation stating that the Queen would only acknowledge land titles derived from Crown Grants and that in future it would be illegal for Europeans to buy land directly from Maori. It further declared that a commission would look into all purchases made prior to annexation. In April 1840 the Treaty was brought to Wellington by the Rev Henry Williams, who had helped with the Treaty drafting. The day before Williams arrived, the New Zealand Company’s provisional constitution and ratification for the Wellington settlement was published in the first local edition of NEVILLE GILMORE the New Zealand Gazette (18 April Wellington signatories to the Trealy of Waitangi 1840). Colonel Wakefield initially include Taringa Kuri — seventh on the list. deterred Maori from signing the 5 Treaty, being concerned about the independence of his settlement. However, after Henry Williams agreed to give up his claim to 60 acres in the capital in return for one acre for him, and one for his assistant Reihana Rewiti (Richard Davis), Wakefield relented — possibly to be seen in a better light and retain the land claimed by the Company. Thirty-one rangatira, including Te Wharepouri of Ngauranga, Te Puni of Petone and Taringa Kuri of Kaiwharawhara, signed the Treaty on board ship in the harbour. Governor Hobson, concerned over the independence of Wellington and by the New Zealand Company’s claims, arrived in Wellington in August 1841 with the Chief Protector of Aborigines (George Clarke) to sort out local land grievances. Subsequently a Commission was set up in Britain to deal with the New Zealand Company’s claims. Land Commissioner William Spain ruled that the Company’s original purchase(s) were invalid, and allowed much smaller areas — 111,000 acres at Wellington, including the land around the harbour, and 50,000 at New Plymouth. Maori were to retain their pa, cultivations and burial grounds and be granted reserves. However rather than returning disputed urban land to Maori, the focus turned to compensation, paid to occupants of the Te Aro, Pipitea, Tiakiwai Kumototo, and Kaiwharawhara pa. The road from Wellington through Kaiwharawhara to Porirua was in use by June 1841, and the Kaiwharawhara area was highly desirable to settlers, having road and sea access, as well as water power for industries such as flour-milling and tanning. The New Zealand Company continued to resist settlement of the reserves issue, but this was finally clarified by the 1847 McCleverty awards. Most Maori settlements were around the harbour, and close to streams. The McCleverty Awards returned to Ngati Tama a small amount of their original land at the mouth of the Kaiwharawhara Stream. In 1885 four owners (Hon Paengahuru of Opunake, Amira Matoroirangi of Parikhake, Komene Paipa of Naiuakaiho and Matui Te Ire) leased 1 rood 19 perches of land to John Newton for 21 years at ten pounds per annum. He established the Caledonian Soap Works there, and sought to freehold the land. A Crown Grant for the land was finally made to Ngati Tama on 13 October 1893. Six months later the restrictions on alienation were removed and in November 1894 Newton was granted freehold title to 37.6 perches (CT 75/274). One of the Maori owners insisted on being paid in gold. Earlier, when their land near Trelissick Park became part of the Trelissick farm for Captain Edward Daniell (Ngaio’s first NZ Company settler), Ngati Tama received allocations of reserve land further inland. For instance they chose the Ngatoto Reserve, (Section 4A 72 acres 1 rood 23 perches). Later they sold this to farmer James Nairn who held early Presbyterian services in his farmhouse. Later again the farm became todays Nairnville Park.
Recommended publications
  • 02 Whole.Pdf (2.654Mb)
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the pennission of the Author. 'UNREALISED PLANS. THE NEW ZEALAND COMPANY IN THE MANAWATU, 1841 - 1844.' A Research Exercise presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements f6r the Diploma in Social Sciences in History at Massey University MARK KRIVAN 1988 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have helped me in the course of researching and writing this essay. The staff of the following: Alexander Turnbull Library. National Archives. Massey University Library. Palmerston North Public Library, especially Mr Robert Ensing. Wellington District Office, Department of Lands and Survey, Wellington, especially Mr Salt et al. Mrs Robertson of the Geography Department Map Library, Massey University. all cheerfully helped in locating sources and Maps, many going out of their way to do so. Mr I.R. Matheson, P.N.C.C. Archivist, suggested readings and shared his views on Maori land tenure in the Manawatu. He also discussed the New Zealand Company in the Manawatu and the location of the proposed towns. He may not agree with all that is written here but his views are appreciated. Thanks to Dr. Barrie MacDonald, Acting Head of Department, for seeing it through the system. Thanks to Maria Green, who typed the final draft with professional skill. My greatest debt is to Dr. J.M.R. Owens, who supervised this essay with good humoured patience. He provided invaluable help with sources and thoughtful suggestions which led to improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Karori Water Supply Dams and Reservoirs Register Report
    IPENZ Engineering Heritage Register Report Karori Water Supply Dams and Reservoirs Written by: Karen Astwood and Georgina Fell Date: 12 September 2012 Aerial view of Karori Reservoir, Wellington, 10 February 1985. Dominion Post (Newspaper): Photographic negatives and prints of the Evening Post and Dominion newspapers, Alexander Turnbull Library (ATL), Wellington, New Zealand, ID: EP/1984/0621. The Lower Karori Dam and Reservoir is in the foreground and the Upper Karori Dam and Reservoir is towards the top of the image. 1 Contents A. General information ........................................................................................................... 3 B. Description ......................................................................................................................... 5 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 Historical narrative .................................................................................................................... 6 Social narrative ...................................................................................................................... 10 Physical narrative ................................................................................................................... 18 C. Assessment of significance ............................................................................................. 24 D. Supporting information .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Khandallah, Broadmeadows, Ngaio, Crofton Downs and Kaiwharawhara
    3 Management sector plans 3.1 Sector 1 Khandallah, Broadmeadows, Ngaio, Crofton Downs and Kaiwharawhara A unique feature of this sector is the harbour escarpment and the steep gullies off Onslow Road and Homebush Road. Where topography permits, the bush reserves have been developed to include tracks, with play areas, kick-about space or informal recreation space sometimes also provided. The Outer Green Belt (OGB) extends right down into Broadmeadows, Crofton Downs, Ngaio and Khandallah and provides a prominent natural setting for residential housing in this area and access to the extensive track system. The suburban reserves enhance ecological connectivity between the OGB and the harbour via the large natural gully reserves and smaller pockets of open space. This sector is adjacent to but does not include Trelissick Park or reserves in the Outer Green Belt. The open space network comprises: • One sport and recreation (community) park – Nairnville Park, which has a 3/4 size artificial field, three winter fields, two summer cricket blocks, a skateboard ramp and a community playground. Nairnville Recreation Centre is located on the park and provides a range of indoor recreation activities and programmes, changing rooms and public toilets during its hours of operation. • Kaiwharawhara Park on Hutt Road has one winter field and changing rooms. • Ngaio Tennis Club leases a recreation reserve on the corner of Crofton Road and Waikowhai Street. • 10 neighbourhood parks with a further two, Khandallah Park and play area and Silverstream Road play area, on the edge of this sector managed under the Outer Green Belt Management Plan. • Several large bush reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Broderick Family of Glenside by Diana Flatman Nee Broderick, 2020
    This material is provided as a historic research, and is copyright to the Glenside Progressive Assn. Inc. If quoting from this article, please acknowledge the copyright and source of the material. For further information contact the Glenside Progressive Assn. Inc. or email [email protected] The Broderick family of Glenside By Diana Flatman nee Broderick, 2020 Introduction This is the story of Creasey and Sarah Ann Broderick, who migrated to New Zealand in 1843 and lived at the Halfway/Glenside from 1845. Their Broderick descendants farmed in Glenside until 1968. Broderick Road in Johnsonville is named for Creasey and Sarah Ann Broderick and the Broderick Inn, which opened on 8 December 1973, was named for its location on Broderick Road. Creasey Broderick (c1810-1884) and Sarah Ann Broderick nee Walters (1806-1888) Photo held: Diana Flatman Collection Page 1 of 27 Background My great great grandfather Creasey Broderick was christened in Boston, Lincolnshire, England on 26 July 1810. He was one of six (perhaps more) children born to John and Mary Ann Broderick (nee Bagshaw). John was a clock and watchmaker in Boston, Lincolnshire, following in the profession of his parents Jessie Creassy Broderick and Elizabeth (nee King). My great great grandfather Creasey became a tailor by profession and worked in London. He married Sarah Ann Walters in St Mary’s Church, Lambeth, Surrey on 24 June, 1827. They set up home in London, mainly in the East End. Five of their seven children were born in London and christened in St Leonard’s Church, Shoreditch. London. The sixth child, Selina, was born in New Zealand and their seventh child was born in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmark of Faith – Johnsonville Anglican Church
    LANDMARK OF FAITH View across Johnsonville from South 1997 St John’s interior view 1997 A SHORT HISTORY OF ST. JOHN’S ANGICLAN CHURCH JOHNSONVILLE 1847 – 1997 ORIGINAL SHORT HISTORY OF ST. JOHN'S ANGLICAN CHURCH JOHNSONVILLE, NEW ZEALAND, BY THE REV. J.B. ARLIDGE, B.A. WITH ADDED MATERIAL 1925 - 1997 BY J.P. BENTALL' A.N.Z.I.A. Published by St. John's Church Johnsonville, Wellington, New Zealand © 1997, 2014 ISBNs: 0-473-05011-0 (original print version) 978-0-473-29319-2 (mobi) 978-0-473-29320-8 (pdf)\ 978-0-473-29317-8 (epub) 978-0-473-29317-8 (kindle) Original publication typeset and printed by Fisher Print Ltd Electronic version compiled and laid out by David Earle Page 2 CONTENTS INDEX OF LINE DRAWINGS IN THIS BOOKLET WHICH ILLUSTRATE ITEMS USED AT ST. JOHN'S .... 4 FOREWORD .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 1972 PROLOGUE AT THB 125TH ANNIVERSARY ............................................................................................. 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ 8 CHAPTER 1: EARLY DAYS 1847 - 1855 ................................................................................................................ 9 THE FIRST CHURCH .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TIMBOWDEN Wellington, New Zealand
    Sales & Leasing Broker TIMBOWDEN Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] Accomplishments Acting in a contract environment, Tim has learnt to land on his feet and quickly identify problem Tim Bowden joined the Sales and EDUCATION OR areas and risks across nationwide property portfolios. Through both the Land Information New Leasing team at Colliers International QUALIFICATIONS Zealand and Z Energy Limited contracts Tim helped develop and implement measures to regularise landuse, manage critical lease deadlines, and maximise property revenues for his clients. Specific Wellington in April 2017. He Licensed Real Estate projects include: specialises in Sales and Leasing in Salesperson the Southern and Eastern suburbs of BSc (Land Planning and - Completion of the highest and best use strategy for LINZ top 50 revenue earning properties; Wellington. Development) - Development of property reporting systems for LINZ; PGDipAppSc (Surveying) He first started with Colliers in 2013 - Management and negotiation of sales processes for Z Energy divestment properties; acting as lease manager across the - Re-structuring and negotiation of Z Energy’s aviation lease portfolio. Land Information New Zealand AFFILIATIONS OR contract before moving within MEMBERSHIPS Recent Sales Transactions Include: Colliers to a lease advisory position Licensed under REAA 2008 • 27-31 Bay Road ($5,300,000) • 181 Rongotai Road ($980,000) with Z Energy. After managing Z’s • 191 Adelaide Road ($975,000) • 33 Kaiwharawhara Road ($720,000) nationwide retail portfolio Tim SPECIALISATIONS • Unit 3, 131 Park Road ($671,000) • 80 Chapel Street ($1,700,000) decided to transfer his property Te Aro • 3-5 George Street ($7,000,000) • 6 Edward Street ($2,490,000) experience to the role of Sales and Sales • 107-121 Adelaide Road ($10,100,000) • 15-19 Pirie Street ($2,200,000) Leasing Broker in the Wellington Leasing • 19 Hatatai Road ($610,000) • 132 Hutt Road ($4,500,000) market.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Katikati Te Puna Purchase
    'JUSTICE, SEASONED WITH MERCY' A report on the Katikati Te Puna purchase BarryRigby A Report Commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal February 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 2 ( CHAPTER TWO: CESSION OR CONFISCATION? ........................................................ 5 CHAPTER THREE: THE INITIATION OF THE PURCHASE ....••.............•................... 9 CHAPTER FOUR: THE POLITICAL CONTEXT........................................................... 11 CHAPTER FIVE: FALTERING FOLLOW-THROUGH ................................................ 15 CHAPTER SIX: ORDER IN COUNCIL 18 MAY 1865 .................................................... 18 CHAPTER SEVEN: THE COMPLETION OF THE PURCHASE ...•............................. 22 CONCLUSION: THE RESPECTIVE INDIVIDUAL ROLES ......................................... 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................. 30 A PRIMARY SOURCES ................................................................................................ 30 B SECONDARY SOURCES .......................................................................................... 31 APPENDIX: DIRECTION COMMISSIONING RESEARCH ........................................ 32 ( MAP: KATIKATI TE PUNA PURCHASE 1866 .•••..•.......•.........•......•................ 4 "'--.;':" '.- . ( CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION The Waitangi Tribunal commissioned this research report
    [Show full text]
  • Report 02126Att
    27/01/2002 04/03/2002 Incident Number Date/Time Complaint notification Summary 12818 28/01/2002 14:06:00 Unpleasant odour from nearby abattoir reported from Odour detected during investigation. Not considered Khandallah, Wellington. to be offensive or objectionable . 12820 29/01/2002 10:58:00 Offensive odour from nearby Sewage Treatment Log only. Plant, Seaview, Lower Hutt. 12843 29/01/2002 10:58:00 Sewage odour coming from nearby Wastewater Log only. Treatment Plant, Seaview. 12834 29/01/2002 13:45:00 Discoloration of Tyres Stream, Rangoon Heights, Investigation found sewage discharge had caused Wellington. discoloration. 12835 29/01/2002 14:25:00 Orange coloured discharge on to beach, Houghton Investigation found iron oxide discharged from Bay, Wellington. surface drainage onto the beach. 12862 29/01/2002 15:15:00 Discoloration of Tyres Stream, Rangoon Heights, On investigation sewage discharge had caused Wellington. discoloration. 12853 29/01/2002 18:09:00 Offensive odour from neighbour, Waikanae, Kapiti Log only, as the event had occurred the previous day. Coast. 12836 29/01/2002 18:55:00 Odour from nearby abattoir, Broadmeadows, On investigation no odour detected. Wellington. 12837 29/01/2002 19:30:00 Discoloration of unnamed stream, Whitemans Valley, On investigation discoloration found to be caused by Upper Hutt. vegetation clearance from drainage ditches. 12838 29/01/2002 20:11:00 Odour from nearby abattoir, Broadmeadows, On investigation, no odour detected Wellington. 12839 29/01/2002 20:26:00 Odour from landfill, Porirua. On investigation, no odour detected 12840 29/01/2002 20:26:00 Odour from landfill, Porirua.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Infrastructure
    Assessment of Water and Sanitary Services 2005 x Long Term Council Community Plan x Bush and Stream Restoration Plan 2001 x Asset Management Plan. 6.3 Stormwater Infrastructure 6.3.1 Catchments A catchment is defined by topography. A main stream and tributaries join together in the catchment to form a water system which drains through a single outlet into the harbour or south coast. Council catchments are generally based upon actual drainage characteristics, but are also affected by management boundaries. The more urbanised eastern side of the Wellington region has been broken up into 42 individual catchments ranging in size and elevation from rural Kaiwharawhara (1917 ha, 420m) to smaller urban catchments such as Thorndon (12 ha, sea level). The rural western region has not been subdivided into catchments at this time. Figure 9 shows the main stormwater catchments. All these catchments contain a multitude of small watercourses, streams and piped stormwater infrastructure. The rural streams are generally narrow and restricted channels with over hanging vegetation, compared to the channelised urban streams. Streams have an average grade of 7.25% throughout the region, representing the steep topography associated with most of the Wellington catchments. Wellington stormwater from these catchments is discharged directly into the City’s streams, harbour and south coast. Eleven of the major discharges to the sea are currently consented under the RMA 1991. The consents for the discharge of wastewater-contaminated stormwater to the coastal marine area were issued in 1994 and require Council to carry out improvement works by 2013. The works are dependent on the individual consent conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Closer Settlement in the Early Liberal Era
    123 WOE UNTO THEM THAT LAY FIELD TO FIELD: CLOSER SETTLEMENT IN THE EARLY LIBERAL ERA Monique van Alphen Fyfe* This article undertakes a re-examination of the origins, construction and application of the Land for Settlements legislation in the early Liberal era. The Liberal's commitment to closer settlement reveals part of the story of highly contested land policy in colonial New Zealand. Land for Settlements legislation of the 1890s, aimed at "bursting up" the great estates, was predominantly the product of settlers' ideological aspirations and two determined politicians: John Ballance and John McKenzie. When measured against the rhetoric used to promote it, however, the policy was not necessarily effective: it was complicated by practical realities and a narrow vision of New Zealand as a vigorous Arcadian paradise. When contrasted with the treatment of Māori land, yet more of the complexity of the land issue and the frailties of the actors facing it are revealed. The article concludes by proposing that Liberal policy, while flawed in execution, may have nevertheless contributed something to the consolidation of the concept of New Zealand as an agrarian ideal, a concept that remains largely intact today. I INTRODUCING AN IDEOLOGY Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey; where wealth accumulates, and men decay.1 Liberal land policy has been an evocative and much examined topic for historians of decades past. The emergence of Waitangi Tribunal histories has since tended to homogenise Crown land policy such that very real shifts in government initiatives risk becoming overlooked. Land policy was, in fact, highly contested in colonial New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Ordinary Council Meeting
    COUNCIL 16 DECEMBER 2020 ORDINARY MEETING OF WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Time: 9:30am Date: Wednesday, 16 December 2020 Venue: Ngake (16.09) Level 16, Tahiwi 113 The Terrace Wellington MEMBERSHIP Mayor Foster Councillor Calvert Councillor Condie Councillor Day Councillor Fitzsimons Councillor Foon Deputy Mayor Free Councillor Matthews Councillor O'Neill Councillor Pannett Councillor Paul Councillor Rush Councillor Sparrow Councillor Woolf Councillor Young Have your say! You can make a short presentation to the Councillors at this meeting. Please let us know by noon the working day before the meeting. You can do this either by phoning 04-803-8334, emailing [email protected] or writing to Democracy Services, Wellington City Council, PO Box 2199, Wellington, giving your name, phone number, and the issue you would like to talk about. All Council and committee meetings are livestreamed on our YouTube page. This includes any public participation at the meeting. COUNCIL 16 DECEMBER 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 16 DECEMBER 2020 Business Page No. 1. Meeting Conduct 5 1.1 Karakia 5 1.2 Apologies 5 1.3 Announcements by the Mayor 5 1.4 Conflict of Interest Declarations 5 1.5 Confirmation of Minutes 5 1.6 Items not on the Agenda 5 1.7 Public Participation 6 2. General Business 7 2.1 Notice of Motion: KiwiRail's Proposed Ferry Terminal 7 Presented by Councillor Young 2.2 Proposed changes to Regional Climate Change Working Group Terms of Reference 15 Presented by Councillor Paul 2.3 Report of the Mayoral Taskforce: Three Waters 33 Presented by Mayor Foster 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Emption, the Treaty of Waitangi and the Politics of Crown Purchase
    Pre-emption, the Treaty of Waitangi and the Politics of Crown Purchase THE TREATY OF WAITANGI was once seen as something unique to the late 1830s, hurriedly devised and reflecting the specific humanitarian, political or international pressures of the moment.1 After the work of Claudia Orange and the new legal studies of the Treaty and international law, this idea of uniqueness is no longer sustainable.2 The Treaty expressed a series of views about sovereignty and property extending back at least to the early colonization of North America.3 But, while not unique, the Treaty of Waitangi was certainly an unusual example of treaties with indigenous peoples, especially in its time. Most North American treaties followed warfare against Native American nations, and ceded large areas of territory to the Crown or the United States. The uncompromising protection of Maori rights to land and other property in the Treaty of Waitangi was unusual, especially when its drafters anticipated large-scale colonization to follow almost immediately. Most of the historical debate has been on the diverse political influences on the evolution of Colonial Office policy between 1835 and 1840,4 but more recently, attention has turned to the Maori side of the Treaty, exploring the nature and limitations of Maori understandings of and agreement to the 1 K. Sinclair, A History of New Zealand, Harmondsworth, 1969, p.71; I. Wards, The Shadow of the Land, A Study of British Policy and Racial Conflict in New Zealand, 1832-1852, Wellington, 1968. p.49. 2 C. Orange, The Treaty of Waitangi, Wellington, 1987; P.
    [Show full text]