DOCSLIB.ORG

Iamp Two Eia Scoping Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iamp Two Eia Scoping Report REPORT IAMP TWO EIA SCOPING REPORT Submitted to: IAMP LLP Submitted by: Golder Associates (UK) Ltd Golder House Tadcaster Enterprise Park, Station Road, Tadcaster, North Yorkshire, LS24 9JF, UK +44 0 1937 837800 1895128.601/A.0 September 2018 September 2018 1895128.601/A.0 Distribution List IAMP LLP - 1 pdf Lichfields - 1 pdf Golder - 1 pdf i September 2018 1895128.601/A.0 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 IAMP .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Evolution of IAMP ONE and TWO .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 The Need for the Proposed Development ........................................................................................ 4 1.5 Requirement for Environmental Assessment .................................................................................... 4 1.6 Objectives of Scoping ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Description of the Proposed Site....................................................................................................... 5 2.2 IAMP Masterplan and Parameters .................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Description of the Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 8 3.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................................................................... 17 4.0 PLANNING POLICY ................................................................................................................................. 19 4.1 National Policy................................................................................................................................. 19 4.2 Local Policy ..................................................................................................................................... 19 5.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............................................................... 20 5.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................................ 20 5.3 Noise ............................................................................................................................................... 24 5.4 Landscape and Visual ..................................................................................................................... 27 5.5 Cultural Heritage ............................................................................................................................. 30 5.6 Waste .............................................................................................................................................. 32 5.7 Water Resources and Flood Risk ................................................................................................... 33 5.8 Geology, Ground Condition and Groundwater ................................................................................ 35 5.9 Ecology and Biodiversity ................................................................................................................. 37 5.10 Access and Transport ..................................................................................................................... 40 5.11 Socio-Economics ............................................................................................................................ 49 5.12 Cumulative and Combined Effects .................................................................................................. 53 6.0 STUDY AREA EXTENTS ......................................................................................................................... 54 ii September 2018 1895128.601/A.0 7.0 NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ................................................................................... 55 7.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 55 7.2 Health Effects .................................................................................................................................. 55 7.3 Risks and Hazards .......................................................................................................................... 56 7.4 Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change ....................................................................................... 57 7.5 Issues Related to Tall Buildings (Aviation and Electronic Interference) ......................................... 57 7.6 Radiation ......................................................................................................................................... 58 8.0 SUMMARY OF SCOPE ............................................................................................................................ 59 9.0 EIA PROCESS .......................................................................................................................................... 59 9.1 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 59 9.2 ES Structure .................................................................................................................................... 60 10.0 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................ 61 11.0 ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 62 TABLES Table 1: Schedule of Plans for IAMP TWO Scoping. ........................................................................................... 7 Table 2: DEFRA estimated background pollutant concentrations for 2018 ....................................................... 21 Table 3: Diffusion Tube Locations ...................................................................................................................... 23 Table 4: Other Developments identified (to date) for potential inclusion in the cumulative assessment ........... 53 Table 5: Study Area Extent by Discipline ........................................................................................................... 54 Table 6: Non-significant Environmental Issues and Justification for Exclusion from Scope .............................. 58 Table 7: Summary of Scope ............................................................................................................................... 59 FIGURES Figure 1: Extent of micro-simulation traffic model .............................................................................................. 42 APPENDICES DRAWINGS Drawing 1: IAMP TWO Scoping Boundary Drawing 2: IAMP TWO Scoping Boundary and Identified Environmental Receptors Drawing 3: Installed Diffusion Tube Locations Drawing 4: Landscape and Visual Study Area Drawing 5: Extent of Proposed Geophysical Survey iii September 2018 1895128.601/A.0 Drawing 6: Ecology - Statutory Designated Sites within 10 km of IAMP TWO Scoping Boundary APPENDIX A Explanatory Plan Development Plots Highways England A19 DCO Projects and IAMP Front image supplied under licence: Andrey Armyagov © 123RF.com iv September 2018 1895128.601/A.0 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Golder Associates (UK) Limited (Golder) has been commissioned by IAMP LLP (the Applicant) to produce an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report to inform the scope and content of an EIA for the proposed IAMP TWO Development Consent Order (DCO) Application. 1.1.2 IAMP TWO forms part of the International Advanced Manufacturing Park (IAMP) being promoted in Sunderland and South Tyneside. The evolution of IAMP as a whole and its relationship with other nationally significant projects nearby are summarised in Section 1.3 below. 1.1.3 This Scoping Report: Presents a detailed description of IAMP TWO and alternatives that have been considered; Defines the planning context in which the IAMP TWO DCO Application is being made; Outlines our current understanding of the existing environmental conditions at IAMP TWO (defined as all the land within the IAMP TWO Scoping Boundary); and Identifies those environmental issues that are considered likely to have significant effects and that therefore need to be included within the scope of the EIA for IAMP TWO. 1.1.4 For each identified potentially significant environmental issue, the proposed scope of the EIA assessment and assessment methodology have been included. 1.1.5 This Scoping Report has been produced in line
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cheeky Chattering in Sunderland
    Cheeky Chattering in Sunderland We travelled into Sunderland so that we can show you how great it is here. The Bridges Shopping Centre The Bridges is in the centre of Sunderland. You can eat in cafes and restaurants and do some shopping. Here are some of our favourite shops Don’t tell Mr Keay we popped into Krispy Kreme! The Head teacher thinks we ‘re working! Mmm, this chocolate doughnut Sunderland Winter Gardens and Museum Sunderland museum first opened almost 150 years ago The Winter Gardens is a museum, we know that because the museum is old. Finding out about the museum Jenny told us all about the museum This is Wallace the lion, he is nearly 150 years old. When the museum first opened children who were blind could visit the museum to feel his fur. Coal mining in Sunderland I would not like to work in the mine Life as a coal miner Working in the mines was dangerous. This family has had to leave their home because their dad was killed in the mine. Inside the Winter Gardens William Pye made this ‘Water Sculpture’ Penshaw Monument Look at the view Penshaw Monument from the top was built in 1844 On Easter Splat! Monday In 1926 a 15 year old boy called Temperley Arthur Scott fell from the top of Penshaw We climbed to Monument and the top of the died. monument It was a cold Winter’s day when Herrington Country Park we visited the park. There are lots of lovely walks to do in the park A skate park for scooters and bikes Stadium of Light Sunderland’s football ground Stadium of Light Samson and Delilah are Sunderland’s mascots River Wear The Beaches in Sunderland There are two beaches in Sunderland called Roker and Seaburn Look at the fun you can have at Seaburn This is what we think about My favourite Bridges Sunderland shop is Game because I support you buy games toys and Sunderland game consoles football club and Ryan, year 7 I like to do football trick.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Hillthorn Farm, Washington, Sunderland Archaeology & Built Heritage Assessment
    LAND AT HILLTHORN FARM, WASHINGTON, SUNDERLAND ARCHAEOLOGY & BUILT HERITAGE ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY PEGASUS GROUP ON BEHALF OF ROLTON Pegasus KILBRIDE Group CIR.K.0178 | OCTOBER 2017 Land at Hillthorn Farm, Washington, Sunderland Archaeology and Built Heritage Assessment Pegasus Group Project Number CIR.K.0178 Version Date Author Approved By Rebecca Gilbey Rosey Meara 1 03.10.2017 Heritage Consultant Principal Heritage Consultant CIR.K.0178 │RG │October 2017 Land at Hillthorn Farm, Washington, Sunderland CONTENTS: APPENDICES: SUMMARY 1 APPENDIX 1: GAZETTEER OF RECORDED HERITAGE ASSETS AND PREVIOUS WORKS WITHIN THE STUDY AREA 37 INTRODUCTION 2 APPENDIX 2: DESIGNATION DESCRIPTIONS 39 METHODOLOGY 5 APPENDIX 3: FIGURES 53 PLANNING POLICY 9 THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT 18 SETTING ASSESSMENT 25 CONCLUSIONS 34 SOURCES 36 CIR.K.0178 │RG │October 2017 Land at Hillthorn Farm, Washington, Sunderland PLATES: FIGURES: PLATE 1: SITE LOCATION PLAN (NOT TO SCALE) ................... 2 FIGURE 1: DESIGNATED HERITAGE ASSETS PLATE 2: VIEW NORTH FROM WITHIN THE SITE DEPICTING THE FIGURE 2: TYNE AND WEAR HER MONUMENT DATA OVERGROWN NATURE ........................................................ 3 FIGURE 3: TYNE AND WEAR HER EVENT DATA PLATE 3: EXTRACT FROM THE WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP TITHE FIGURE 4: PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL WORKS IN THE SITE MAP OF 1843 ................................................................... 20 PLATE 4: EXTRACT FROM THE FIRST EDITION ORDNANCE SURVEY MAP OF 1857 ....................................................... 21 PLATE 5: VIEW NORTH ALONG THE DISMANTLED RAILWAY, SITE TO THE EAST BEYOND EXISTING VEGETATION .................... 22 PLATE 6: VIEW EAST TOWARDS WASHINGTON OLD HALL ..... 26 PLATE 7: VIEW FROM WITHIN THE SITE TOWARDS THE LISTED BUILDINGS AT WASHINGTON OLD HALL ............................. 27 PLATE 8: VIEW NORTH-EAST TOWARDS THE CHURCH OF HOLY TRINITY .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sunderland U3a
    SUNDERLAND U3A NOVEMBER 2012 No: 30 Sunderland U3A Fulwell Methodist Church Dovedale Road Sunderland MEETING: 3rd Wednesday of each month at 1.30 for 2.00pm Spirit of the Tyne MEMBERSHIP: 0191 549 0984 Sunderland University of the Third Age: A member of the Third Age Trust NOVEMBER 2012 FROM THE EDITORS CONTENTS The summer weather may have been disappointing, but the U3A still managed to stage lots of interesting activities and events for members to enjoy. You can read about some From the Editorial Team 2 of these events in this issue. If you are still hesitating over trying new activities then From the Chair 3 perhaps the accounts in this edition may encourage you to try something different in Future speakers 3 2013. And remember, we only have such an interesting programme thanks to the efforts of volunteers from among the membership. Group News 4 Tynedale U3A Exhibition 10 On a personal note, this is the fifth year I have been working on the magazine: enough for anyone … so I plan to stand down and make way for someone with fresh ideas to Who’s for Tai Chi? 10 take over. Dorothy will take over the production of the next issue in May 2013 and I Scramston Hall Garden 11 hope you will give her your support (and write lots of material). If anyone would like to Walkers’ Prayer 12 think about taking over in the future, please talk to Dorothy. Edinburgh Book Sculptures 13 Elsie Bringing Music to the People 14 ============================== Fascinating Words 15 Public Sculpture: The Dive, the Surface and the Roll 16 Quiz: Occupations 16 Comet ISON 17 Go to Work on a Christmas Card 18 Singing in the Rain 18 Elephant Artist Sri Computer Woes 19 Si am at work at the Some Computer Firsts 19 Lamphang Elephant Camp in Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunderland,Seaham& Murtonedition 6 October‘01- Summer‘02
    with the FREE Sunderland, Seaham & Murton Edition 6 October ‘01 - Summer ‘02 Inside: l Changes to bus services from 6th October 2001. l Easy Access buses for services 135, 136, 310 & 319. l New links to Doxford International evenings and timetables Sundays on service 222. l Service revisions to improve reliability. and information Service Changes in the Sunderland area Index of Timetables Go with the Times Timetable Pages Go Wear Buses Service Changes Effective from Saturday 6th October 2001 Service No. Page Service number Page Service number Page 35/35A/36 9 -11 151/152 28 - 30 X4 58 As a result of changes to travel patterns, rising operating costs and increasing traffic congestion, 45 11 154 30 - 31 X6 59 it has become necessary to review our services. Feedback received from our customers has been 37/37A 12 - 13 160/163 32 - 35 X7 60 used to confirm a number of service revisions, with a number of journeys being retimed, rerouted 126 14 161 36 - 37 X8 60 or under utilised services withdrawn. Additionally a number of key links have been strengthened, 133 15 - 16 185 38 X20/X50 61 - 62 and various new links introduced to reflect the needs of all bus users. 134 17 186 39 X45 63 135 18 187/188 40 - 41 X61/X64 64 - 65 Services 35, 35A & 36 Services 185, 187 & 188 136 19 190 41 X85 65 - 66 Monday to Friday morning journeys will operate up to 5 minutes earlier Most service 185 and 187 buses will be retimed by up to 5 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicative Layout and Capacity Study of Proposed Housing Release Sites HRS1: North of Mount Lane, Springwell Village
    Core Strategy and Development Plan Indicative Layout and Capacity Study of Proposed Housing Release Sites HRS1: North of Mount Lane, Springwell Village Location SHLAA site: 407C Impact on the Green Belt: • Located on the western edge of the existing residential area of Housing release policy: HRS1 There is a moderate impact on the Green Belt if this Springwell Village site is to be removed. The site is on the urban fringe of • Lies immediately to the rear of Wordsworth Crescent and Beech Grove Owner/developer: Hellens the village and would have limited impact on urban • Lies on elevated farmland to the north of Mount Lane sprawl and countryside encroachment. Site size: 3.20 ha • Existing residential communities to the north and east • Arable land to the south and west • Close proximity to the centre of Springwell Village (which includes shops and a primary school) • Good access to the main bus route Key constraints • Bowes Railway is a Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) and is located to the west of the site • Springwell Ponds Local Wildlife Site (LWS) is situated to the west of the site which includes protected species. Wildlife will move through the site • The site is relatively level however the land beyond slopes southward toward Mount Lane • Development on the southern edge of the site will be subject to long distant views • Vehicle and pedestrian access to the site is restricted to one access point • Highway junction improvements will be required at Mount Lane • Development would have to ensure that additional infrastructure such as
    [Show full text]
  • Penshaw Monument Circular Passing the Sign for Penshaw Wood on the Right
    Key points of interest quarrying industries. Coal was carried Heritage Trails Coalfield Area by wagons down to the river to keel A) Penshaw Monument boats which would then transport the Penshaw Monument was built in coal on to awaiting ships close to the honour of John Lambton, the 1st Earl mouth of the river. of Durham. It’s foundation stone was laid on 28 August 1844. The E) Penshaw Railway monument is based on the design of This disused railway line forms part of 1 the Theseion, the Temple of the old Penshaw railway which was Hephaestus in Athens. established in 1852 to carry freight to Walk It was built using £6,000 raised by Hendon. In 1853 it began operating a public subscription and is one of passenger service into Sunderland Wearside’s most iconic landmarks. town centre. The line is now a popular route used by cyclists and joggers. It Penshaw B) Victoria Viaduct eventually leads to South Hylton and This bridge is one of the most the Tyne and Wear Metro line. Monument impressive stone viaducts in Britain. Named after Queen Victoria, the final F) Penshaw Woods stone of this bridge was laid on her Site of Penshaw Quarry owned by the Circular Coronation Day, 28 June 1838. It is Marquis of Londonderry, this is now an Walk Distance & Time: said that its design was inspired by a attractive broadleaf woodland. 2nd century Roman bridge in Spain. 4 miles or 6.5km The viaduct was built to carry rail traffic Facilities & Accessibility: over the Wear and was the main rail 2 hours (approx) line between Newcastle to London until Toilet facilities and catering: 1872.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunderland Cultural Strategy October 2014 CONTENTS
    Sunderland October Cultural 2014 Strategy Sunderland Cultural Strategy October 2014 CONTENTS SECTION 1. OUR CITY AND ITS CULTURE ............................................................................................................... 05 “WHAT DO WE MEAN BY CULTURE? ...............................................................................................05 OUR CITY - SUNDERLAND .................................................................................................................. 07 WHAT WILL THE STRATEGY ADDRESS? ...........................................................................................09 SECTION 2. SHAPING THE CITY’S CULTURAL OFFER .......................................................................................13 WHAT WILL THE STRATEGY ACHIEVE? .............................................................................................13 OUR APPROACH – DEVELOPING ARTISTS, AUDIENCES AND VENUES ..................................15 DESIGN PRINCIPLES ............................................................................................................................. 18 HOW WILL THE STRATEGY WORK? .................................................................................................. 19 HOW WILL THE STRATEGY BE MANAGED AND MONITORED? ................................................ 19 SECTION 3. OUR COMMITMENTS - STRATEGY INTO ACTION......................................................................21 HOW CAN YOU GET INVOLVED? .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Heritage Offer - Discussion Paper
    REPORT FOR WASHINGTON AREA COMMITTEE 7 JANUARY 2010 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CITY SERVICES WASHINGTON HERITAGE OFFER - DISCUSSION PAPER 1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1.1 The purpose of the report is for Members of the Washington Area Committee to discuss and recommend ways forward in relation to the Heritage agenda within Washington, in order that projects can be investigated and developed for the future. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Washington is located in the west of Sunderland and is divided into small villages or districts, with the original settlement being named Washington Village. Washington became a new town in 1964 and a part of Sunderland in 1974. Washington is now a diverse town offering wonderful countryside views, fascinating history, heritage and leisure attractions. 3.0 CONTEXT 3.1 Heritage is an area of continuing growth both across the region and for the City of Sunderland. Sunderland has a distinct heritage and there is a strong sense of pride across the city. This pride is based on our character and our traditions, including the distinct identity of specific communities and the cultural traditions of our people. A successful nomination which is currently being developed for World Heritage Status would allow the city to become a cultural heritage landmark as one of three World Heritage Sites across the region and 27 sites across the UK, allowing the city to prosper in areas such as economic development and tourism. 3.2 Heritage for the city is managed and delivered through the City Services Directorate, with two part-time heritage officers working to deliver the Heritage agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Limestone Landscapes: a Geodiversity Audit and Action Plan for The
    Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action plan for the Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau Geology and Landscape England Programme Open Report OR/09/007 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY AND LANDSCAPE ENGLAND PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/09/007 Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used plan for the Durham Magnesian with the permission of the Con- troller of Her Majesty’s Station- ery Office. Limestone Plateau Licence No: 100017897/ 2009. Keywords geodiversity, Durham, Permian, D J D Lawrence Limestone, Landscape. National Grid Reference Editor SW corner 429800,521000 Centre point 438000,544000 A H Cooper NE corner 453400,568000 Front cover The Magnesian Limestone at Marsden Bay Bibliographical reference LAWRENCE, D J D. 2009. Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action plan for the Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/09/007. 114pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Sur- vey, Keyworth, E-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ord- nance
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © 2020 Trustees of the Royal Air Force Museum 1
    Individual Object History Hawker Hurricane Mk I P2617/8373M Museum Object Number 72/A/1404 1938 Ordered by the Air Ministry from Hawker Aircraft Co Ltd, contract No.962371/38/C.23a, and sub-contracted to Gloster Aircraft Co Ltd. Part of a batch of 500 aircraft. 1939/40 Built by Gloster Aircraft Co Ltd at Brockworth near Gloucester as part of batch P2614-P2653. Fitted with 3-blade propeller and 1,280hp Merlin III No.119697. Now carries Merlin 33739. Probably test flown at Glosters. It should be noted however that the centre-section is possibly Hawkers – built, as is that on RAFM Hurricane I P3175. 19 Jan 40 Taken on Air Ministry Charge. To No.20 MU Aston Down (Storage Unit). 24 Feb 40 To No.6 MU Brize Norton (Storage Unit). 14 Apr 40 Allotted to No. 615 (County of Surrey) Squadron Royal Auxiliary Air Force, then based in France at Vitry-en-Artois, but temporarily at Abbeville, equipped with Gladiators. 14 Apr 40 Allotted to No.1 Repair and Salvage Unit - same day as No. 615 Squadron allocation. 15 Apr 40 Allotted to No. 607 (County of Durham) Squadron Royal Auxiliary Air Force at Abbeville, France, equipped with Gladiator aircraft, but in the process of re- equipping with Hurricanes This almost immediate reallocation from No. 615 Squadron may perhaps be explained by a possible pooling of aircraft between squadrons. Both were part of the air component of the British Expeditionary Force. 26 Apr 40 No. 607 Squadron returned to Vitry-en-Artois (NW of Arras) upon completion of conversion to Hurricanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Lodge Nursing Home a High-Quality Nursing and Residential Care Home in the Heart of Washington
    Washington Lodge Nursing Home A high-quality nursing and residential care home in the heart of Washington Washington Lodge Nursing Home, The Avenue, Washington Village, Washington, NE38 7LE www.qualiacare.co.uk | Tel: 0191 466 1402 | Email: [email protected] www.qualiacare.co.uk Washington Lodge Nursing Home | 1 2 | Washington Lodge Nursing Home Welcome to Washington Lodge Nursing Home The Care We Provide Location At Washington Lodge we provide 24-hour nursing Washington Lodge enjoys a pleasant location in the dementia care for people living with a dementia or residential heart of Washington Village, a town in the related condition, who often need greater support due North East with historic links to relations of George to significant health needs. Washington, the first president of the United States. We also provide nursing care for older people who Washington is well-connected to the surrounding have health needs and either require greater support cities of Newcastle (10 miles to the north), Sunderland than can be provided in their current home, or who are (7 miles to the east) and historic Durham (12 miles to recovering from a significant health issue. the south), which are easily accessible thanks to good transport links. Our care is provided by qualified and dedicated nursing teams in an environment specially adapted to each The nearby Washington Old Hall, a 17th Century resident’s needs. Each resident receives a care plan mansion and now a National Trust museum and which reflects their individual strengths, interests and gardens, was home to five generations of George physical and emotional abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRIS KILLIP and the MAKING of in FLAGRANTE at the J. Paul Getty
    OBJECT LIST NOW THEN: CHRIS KILLIP AND THE MAKING OF IN FLAGRANTE At the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Center May 23–August 13, 2017 1. Chris Killip (British, born 1946) Couple, Whitley Bay, Tyneside, negative 1976; print 1987 Gelatin silver print Image: 10.6 x 8.9 cm (4 3/16 x 3 1/2 in.) The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, Purchased in part with funds provided by Alison Bryan Crowell, Trish and Jan de Bont, Daniel Greenberg and Susan Steinhauser, Manfred Heiting, Gloria Katz and Willard Huyck, and Lyle and Lisi Poncher © Chris Killip 2014.36.10 2. Chris Killip (British, born 1946) Terraced House and Coal Mine, Castleford, Yorkshire, negative 1976; print 1986 Gelatin silver print Image: 27.3 x 34.5 cm (10 3/4 x 13 9/16 in.) The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, Purchased in part with funds provided by Alison Bryan Crowell, Trish and Jan de Bont, Daniel Greenberg and Susan Steinhauser, Manfred Heiting, Gloria Katz and Willard Huyck, and Lyle and Lisi Poncher © Chris Killip 2014.36.16 3. Chris Killip (British, born 1946) Glue Sniffers, Whitehaven, Cumbria, negative 1980; print 1988 Gelatin silver print Image: 27.5 x 33.9 cm (10 13/16 x 13 3/8 in.) The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, Purchased in part with funds provided by Alison Bryan Crowell, Trish and Jan de Bont, Daniel Greenberg and Susan Steinhauser, Manfred Heiting, Gloria Katz and Willard Huyck, and Lyle and Lisi Poncher © Chris Killip 2014.36.23 4. Chris Killip (British, born 1946) Youth on Wall, Jarrow, Tyneside, negative 1976; print 1986 Gelatin silver print Image: 27.5 x 34.1 cm (10 13/16 x 13 7/16 in.) The J.
    [Show full text]