DOCSLIB.ORG

The New York Times Book of Mathematics Reviewed by Ian Stewart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New York Times Book of Mathematics Reviewed by Ian Stewart Book Review The New York Times Book of Mathematics Reviewed by Ian Stewart an order that helps to The New York Times Book of Mathematics tell a story—which is, Edited by Gina Kolata after all, what journal- Sterling, 2013 ism is about. US$24.95, 496 pages This choice makes ISBN-13: 978-1402793226 the book far more ac- cessible to the general Mathematicians often complain that their subject reader, though I’m is neglected in the mass media, although when it tempted to photocopy does get reported there always seem to be a few the contents list and of us who find it impossible to resist the urge to shuffle the articles complain bitterly about inaccuracies and “hype”, back into the order which usually seems to mean the promotion of the of publication. Read- area concerned instead of their own. As this sump- ing them in that order tuous volume demonstrates, neither complaint would give a dramatic can sensibly be directed at the New York Times perception of how our subject has changed over [NYT ]. For more than a century this high-quality the last 120 years; however, this comes over any- newspaper has done sterling work in the service way. Paul Hoffman’s foreword and Gina Kolata’s in- of our profession, the public, and the cause of sci- troduction provide concise and helpful overviews ence journalism. of such questions, and the first group of topics This collection contains more than a hundred addresses general issues of what mathematics is NYT articles on mathematics and its applications and what it’s for. That said, this is clearly a book of all kinds, dating back to 1892 and written by that you can dip into fairly randomly, and I’m over thirty authors—some journalists, some math- going to spend much of this review doing just ematicians, some neither. Together they provide that. Along the way, I’ll say a little about how the an unusual overview of our subject and how it is selected articles illuminate broader “philosophical” perceived by everyone else. It is an eclectic col- issues—just as the whim takes me. lection, ranging from an anonymous piece on life Roughly speaking, the seven sections deal with insurance at the end of the nineteenth century to the nature of mathematics, chance, famous prob- Grigori Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré Conjec- lems, chaos, cryptography, computers, and biogra- ture. The editor has resisted the temptation to phy. Immediately we get a glimpse of which areas place the articles in chronological order, grouping of mathematics are deemed newsworthy or, per- them into seven major areas and then following haps, just appealed to the editor. Large regions of the mathematical landscape are untouched—only Ian Stewart is a science writer and professor emeritus of passing reference to Fourier transforms (though mathematics at the University of Warwick. His email ad- the use of wavelets for image compression is men- dress is [email protected]. tioned), nothing on symmetry except the E8 “size DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/noti1117 of Manhattan” calculation. The only mathematical MAY 2014 NOTICES OF THE AMS 495 biology is a short piece on the flocking of birds help them tell the story accurately as it unfolds. from 1987. I’m not complaining about what’s not In every other field of human activity, this kind been included; just posting a mild warning notice of thing happens on a daily basis. I’ve lost count for potential readers. What has been included is of how many times a cosmologist has announced worthy, valuable, and fascinating, fully justifying that dark matter has been detected definitively, the book’s existence. only for another one to shoot the whole thing I’ll jump in with the third section, on famous down in flames. problems, solved and unsolved. This covers what If keeping the lid on Miyaoka’s ideas and Wiles’s by now is familiar ground to most mathemati- discovery was difficult two decades ago, it’s totally cians: the Poincaré conjecture, the four-color impossible in this age of Twitter and Facebook. problem, the Goldbach conjecture, Fermat’s Last We may privately wish the world were otherwise, Theorem [FLT], and a flurry of less celebrated but with discoveries being made public only when still important questions such as optimal packing they have become definitive—but it’s not. Indeed, of tetrahedra and Steiner trees. In its treatment in most areas outside mathematics something of Fermat’s Last Theorem, the NYT offered its can be definitive for decades and then turn out readers glimpses of mathematics in the making. to be totally wrong. The payoff from this kind of “Mathematics expert may soon resolve a 350-year warts-and-all disclosure is almost entirely positive: problem…” You’d be justified in assuming this the public experiences the excitement of serious was advance notice of Andrew Wiles’s work, but new mathematics, and sees new things happening actually the piece is about an abortive attempt by as they occur. They discover that we are actually Yoichi Miyaoka in 1988. It reminds us that math- doing things. It may be “unfortunate” when some- ematical research does not consist of triumphs times the excitement fizzles out, but a week later alone; it involves many unsuccessful attempts. The the only people fretting about it are a few anally article is suitably cautious: “Nobody has the right retentive specialists. Get a life. to have an opinion yet.” The subsequent article, James Gleick features prominently in the book, “Fermat’s theorem solved? Not this time” provides because he writes so much and so well about our the dénouement. subject, so it is hardly surprising that chaos and A month later, the NYT is reporting what ex- related topics get a section to themselves. The area perts in number theory had been quietly saying for is, actually, rather important. Remarkably, the NYT about a decade: the road to a solution might well spotted this coming in 1938—in a way. It reported be opened up by the theory of elliptic curves. Five Norbert Wiener’s work on Brownian motion, reveal- years later “At last, shout of Eureka!” told the world ing statistical regularities in random movements. of Wiles’s Cambridge announcement, confirming But it also mentioned George Birkhoff’s approach that belief. This was followed up by a longer de- to chaotic events, which later led Stephen Smale scription of what Wiles did—“you use Hilbert ir- to the horseshoe, a key step in understanding reducibility and the Cebotarevˇ density theorem … that deterministic chaotic dynamics has its own to produce a noncuspidal rational point”—well patterns. This section is an eclectic mix of various done, James Gleick! Handled so deftly that he topics from nonlinear dynamics—chaos, catas- gets away with it, while readers gain a subliminal trophes, complexity, stochastics—ending with an insight that this stuff is difficult and advanced, obituary of Benoît Mandelbrot and a summary of yet follows some kind of coherent mathematical the development of fractals. narrative. Except… “Flaw is found in math proof, Much of this area was a cause of controversy but repairs are under way.” Then “Fermat’s puzzle when the media got hold of it; some still is. “Here is still not quite Q.E.D.” And finally, “How a gap in is a mathematician’s nightmare that I heard in the the Fermat proof was bridged.” 1980s,” Gleick writes. “[A] mathematician dreamed This is what real research is like. A few steps that Mandelbrot died and God spoke: ‘You know, forward, a step or two back. With luck and a fol- there really was something to that Mandelbrot.’” lowing wind, you may actually reach your destina- Today’s mathematicians mostly think that God had tion. But should any of this have been reported? Is a point, though a few reckon we are still living the it “premature” to inform the press of major new nightmare. Perhaps if they read Science and Na- developments as they are happening, and before ture regularly they would realize how thoroughly the community has peer-reviewed them? Well, fractals now pervade numerous areas of science. Wiles kept everything secret until he was confident A third major theme, one that future historians he was right, and his announcement was low-key: of mathematics will have to come to grips with, is nothing terribly wrong there. But, gosh, well… the remarkable interplay between mathematics there was a gap. These things happen. Wiles was and computing. Once again the NYT is on the case lucky, Miyaoka not. The plain fact is that, even in early; once again, the story is not what we might the early 1990s, there is no way that the media expect. In 1927 it carried a short article on Van- would not have got wind of a possible solution nevar Bush’s “thinking machine”—more properly, of FLT. The best we can do, as a profession, is to the “product integraph”, an analog device for 496 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 61, NUMBER 5 solving differential equations. By 1947 we are once brought a live tiger into a lecture room full hearing of two “giant electronic brains” being es- of children. tablished by the National Bureau of Standards, suc- You’ll guess that both of them are the same cessors to ENIAC and similar beasts. “A third com- person—me. Even the second one pales into in- puting machine might be built in the near future to significance compared to the remarkable math- speed up the calculations of the Census Bureau.” In ematicians that actually have been featured in the the same year, ENIAC is being “converted so that it NYT.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, by James Gleick
    16. Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, by James Gleick From the author of the national bestseller Chaos comes an outstanding biography of one of the most dazzling and flamboyant scientists of the 20th century that "not only paints a highly attractive portrait of Feynman but also . makes for a stimulating adventure in the annals of science" 15. “Surely You’re Joking, Mr Feynman!” by Richard Feynman and Ralph Leighton Richard Feynman, winner of the Nobel Prize in physics, thrived on outrageous adventures. Here he recounts in his inimitable voice his experience trading ideas on atomic physics with Einstein and Bohr and ideas on gambling with Nick the Greek; cracking the uncrackable safes guarding the most deeply held nuclear secrets; accompanying a ballet on his bongo drums; painting a naked female toreador. In short, here is Feynman's life in all its eccentric―a combustible mixture of high intelligence, unlimited curiosity, and raging chutzpah. 14. D Day – Through German Eyes, The Hidden Story of June 6th 1944, by Holger Eckhertz Almost all accounts of D Day are told from the Allied perspective, with the emphasis on how German resistance was overcome on June 6th 1944. But what was it like to be a German soldier in the bunkers and gun emplacements of the Normandy coast, facing the onslaught of the mightiest seaborne invasion in history? What motivated the German defenders, what were their thought processes - and how did they fight from one strong point to another, among the dunes and fields, on that first cataclysmic day? What were their experiences on facing the tanks, the flamethrowers and the devastating air superiority of the Allies? This book sheds fascinating light on these questions, bringing together statements made by German survivors after the war, when time had allowed them to reflect on their state of mind, their actions and their choices of June 6th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Materiality & Ontology of Digital Subjectivity
    THE MATERIALITY & ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY: GRIGORI “GRISHA” PERELMAN AS A CASE STUDY IN DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada Copyright Gary Larsen 2015 Theory, Culture, and Politics M.A. Graduate Program September 2015 Abstract THE MATERIALITY & ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY: GRIGORI “GRISHA” PERELMAN AS A CASE STUDY IN DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY Gary Larsen New conditions of materiality are emerging from fundamental changes in our ontological order. Digital subjectivity represents an emergent mode of subjectivity that is the effect of a more profound ontological drift that has taken place, and this bears significant repercussions for the practice and understanding of the political. This thesis pivots around mathematician Grigori ‘Grisha’ Perelman, most famous for his refusal to accept numerous prestigious prizes resulting from his proof of the Poincaré conjecture. The thesis shows the Perelman affair to be a fascinating instance of the rise of digital subjectivity as it strives to actualize a new hegemonic order. By tracing first the production of aesthetic works that represent Grigori Perelman in legacy media, the thesis demonstrates that there is a cultural imperative to represent Perelman as an abject figure. Additionally, his peculiar abjection is seen to arise from a challenge to the order of materiality defended by those with a vested interest in maintaining the stability of a hegemony identified with the normative regulatory power of the heteronormative matrix sustaining social relations in late capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Knowledge and Mathematical Collaboration: a Philosophical Examination of the Classification of Finite Simple Groups
    Group Knowledge and Mathematical Collaboration: A Philosophical Examination of the Classification of Finite Simple Groups Joshua Habgood-Coote and Fenner Stanley Tanswell Forthcoming in Episteme, please refer to final version. Abstract In this paper we apply social epistemology to mathematical proofs and their role in mathematical knowledge. The most famous modern collaborative mathematical proof effort is the Classification of Finite Simple Groups. The history and sociology of this proof have been well-documented by Alma Steingart (2012), who highlights a number of surprising and unusual features of this collaborative endeavour that set it apart from smaller-scale pieces of mathematics. These features raise a number of interesting philosophical issues, but have received very little attention. In this paper, we will consider the philosophical tensions that Steingart uncovers, and use them to argue that the best account of the epistemic status of the Classification Theorem will be essentially and ineliminably social. This forms part of the broader argument that in order to understand mathematical proofs, we must appreciate their social aspects. 1 Introduction Popular conceptions of mathematics are gripped by the myth of the ‘lone genius’. This myth is inspired by famous figures like Andrew Wiles, Grigori Perelman, and Srinivasa Ramanujan whose individual efforts are taken to be both representative and exemplary. In this paper, we push back against this individualistic view of how mathematics is and should be practiced, examining the significance of social and group level features of mathematical practices. In particular, we will discuss the epistemology of mathematics, and argue that in order to understand mathematics and its epistemology, we need to pay attention to collaboration, group knowledge, and other social factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Theorems in Mathematics
    SOME FUNDAMENTAL THEOREMS IN MATHEMATICS OLIVER KNILL Abstract. An expository hitchhikers guide to some theorems in mathematics. Criteria for the current list of 243 theorems are whether the result can be formulated elegantly, whether it is beautiful or useful and whether it could serve as a guide [6] without leading to panic. The order is not a ranking but ordered along a time-line when things were writ- ten down. Since [556] stated “a mathematical theorem only becomes beautiful if presented as a crown jewel within a context" we try sometimes to give some context. Of course, any such list of theorems is a matter of personal preferences, taste and limitations. The num- ber of theorems is arbitrary, the initial obvious goal was 42 but that number got eventually surpassed as it is hard to stop, once started. As a compensation, there are 42 “tweetable" theorems with included proofs. More comments on the choice of the theorems is included in an epilogue. For literature on general mathematics, see [193, 189, 29, 235, 254, 619, 412, 138], for history [217, 625, 376, 73, 46, 208, 379, 365, 690, 113, 618, 79, 259, 341], for popular, beautiful or elegant things [12, 529, 201, 182, 17, 672, 673, 44, 204, 190, 245, 446, 616, 303, 201, 2, 127, 146, 128, 502, 261, 172]. For comprehensive overviews in large parts of math- ematics, [74, 165, 166, 51, 593] or predictions on developments [47]. For reflections about mathematics in general [145, 455, 45, 306, 439, 99, 561]. Encyclopedic source examples are [188, 705, 670, 102, 192, 152, 221, 191, 111, 635].
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Grothendieck Heng Li
    Alexander Grothendieck Heng Li Alexander Grothendieck's life Alexander Grothendieck was a German born French mathematician. Grothendieck was born on March 28, 1928 in Berlin. His parents were Johanna Grothendieck and Alexander Schapiro. When he was five years old, Hitler became the Chancellor of the German Reich, and called to boycott all Jewish businesses, and ordered civil servants who were not of the Aryan race to retire. Grothendieck's father was a Russian Jew and at that time, he used the name Tanaroff to hide his Jewish Identity. Even with a Russian name it is still too dangerous for Jewish people to stay in Berlin. In May 1933, his father, Alexander Schapiro, left to Paris because the rise of Nazism. In December of the same year, his mother left Grothendieck with a foster family Heydorns in Hamburg, and joined Schapiro in Paris. While Alexander Grothendieck was with his foster family, Grothendieck's parents went to Spain and partici- pated in the Spanish Civil War. After the Spanish Civil War, Johanna(Hanka) Grothendieck and Alexander Schapiro returned to France. In Hamburg, Alexander Grothendieck attended to elementary schools and stud- ied at the Gymnasium (a secondary school). The Heydorns family are a part of the resistance against Hitler; they consider that it was too dangerous for young Grothendieck to stay in Germany, so in 1939 the Heydorns sent him to France to join his parents. However, because of the outbreak of World War II all German in France were required by law to be sent to special internment camps. Grothendieck and his parents were arrested and sent to the camp, but fortunately young Alexander Grothendieck was allowed to continue his education at a village school that was a few miles away from the camp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Stephen Hawking's Blockbuster
    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS IAN BERRY/MAGNUM PHOTOS IAN BERRY/MAGNUM Stephen Hawking and colleagues at the University of Cambridge in the 1980s, before the publication of A Brief History of Time. PUBLISHING A brief history of Stephen Hawking’s blockbuster Elizabeth Leane surveys the extraordinary influence of the physicist’s first foray into popular-science publishing. owards the end of The Theory of rarely reach the million mark, and are usu- History of Time is not, as is sometimes Everything, the 2014 film about ally much lower. So this is an astounding claimed, unprecedented. There were Stephen Hawking, scenes depict the achievement for a science book aimed at nineteenth-century science blockbusters Treception of his popular science classic, A the non-scientist, and especially for one such as mathematician Mary Somerville’s Brief History of Time (1988). The camera that grapples with the some of the biggest 1834 On the Connexion of the Physical zooms in on a large display of the book in questions in physics — the Big Bang, black Sciences (see R. Holmes Nature 514, 432– a shop window; fans crowd the physicist- holes, a ‘theory of everything’ and the nature 433; 2014). And in 1930, physicist James author, hoping that he will autograph their of time. As Hawking entertainingly related Jeans’ The Mysterious Universe achieved a copies. Future events are outlined in the in a 2013 essay in The Wall Street Journal, comparable reception to Hawking’s book film’s closing titles: the first relates not to he rewrote A Brief History repeatedly at (in Britain, at least); the jacket of the 1937 the ongoing impact of Hawking’s scientific the behest of his editor, Peter Guzzardi at Pelican edition promotes it as “the famous achievements or the challenges of living Bantam, to make it more understandable to book which upset tradition by making with motor neuron disease, but to the sales a lay readership.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominations for President
    Nominations for President combinatorics which was then starting to become fashion- Nomination of able; and some number theory, which has never gone out George Andrews of fashion although the parts of it George dealt with were not fashionable then. George spent a year on leave at MIT. Richard Askey At Rota’s suggestion, he edited the “Collected Papers” of P. A. MacMahon. He also wrote a book, “The Theory of Who is George Andrews? According to Freeman Dyson, Partitions”, for the Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its George Andrews is the chief gardener in Ramanujan’s Gar- Applications series which Rota edited. den. This is true, but is only part of who George Andrews George came to the University of Wisconsin-Madison for is. He is a number theorist with an honorary doctorate in a year, 1976-77. In the spring he went to Europe for two physics. He is a long-time user of computers in his own meetings in France. Since he was not teaching and airfare research, who has written about the harm technology can abroad was less expensive if you spent 21 to 45 days, he do in mathematics education. He is primarily a problem also went to Cambridge to look for old work in the Wren solver, yet one paper with Rodney Baxter and Peter For- Library of Trinity College. This changed his life. rester has had a major impact in mathematical physics What George found was a bit over 100 pages of math- with currently 490 citations in the Web of Science. ematical claims in the distinctive handwriting of Srinivasa George Andrews received his Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications at the International Congress by Marty Golubitsky
    From SIAM News, Volume 39, Number 10, December 2006 Applications at the International Congress By Marty Golubitsky Grigori Perelman’s decision to decline the Fields Medal, coupled with the speculations surrounding this decision, propelled the 2006 Fields Medals to international prominence. Stories about the medals and the award ceremony at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Madrid this summer appeared in many influential news outlets (The New York Times, BBC, ABC, . .) and even in popular magazines (The New Yorker). In Madrid, the topologist John Morgan gave an excellent account of the history of the Poincaré conjecture and the ideas of Richard Hamilton and Perelman that led to the proof that the three-dimensional conjecture is correct. As Morgan pointed out, proofs of the Poincaré con- jecture and its direct generalizations have led to four Fields Medals: to Stephen Smale (1966), William Thurston (1982), Michael Freedman (1986), and now Grigori Perelman. The 2006 ICM was held in the Palacio Municipal de Congressos, a modern convention center on the outskirts of Madrid, which easily accommodated the 3600 or so participants. The interior of the convention center has a number of intriguing views—my favorite, shown below, is from the top of the three-floor-long descending escalator. Alfio Quarteroni’s plenary lecture on cardiovascular mathematics was among the many ses- The opening ceremony included a welcome sions of interest to applied mathematicians. from Juan Carlos, King of Spain, as well as the official announcement of the prize recipients—not only the four Fields Medals but also the Nevanlinna Prize and the (newly established) Gauss Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Prize Is Awarded Every Three Years at the Joint Mathematics Meetings
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY LEVI L. CONANT PRIZE This prize was established in 2000 in honor of Levi L. Conant to recognize the best expository paper published in either the Notices of the AMS or the Bulletin of the AMS in the preceding fi ve years. Levi L. Conant (1857–1916) was a math- ematician who taught at Dakota School of Mines for three years and at Worcester Polytechnic Institute for twenty-fi ve years. His will included a bequest to the AMS effective upon his wife’s death, which occurred sixty years after his own demise. Citation Persi Diaconis The Levi L. Conant Prize for 2012 is awarded to Persi Diaconis for his article, “The Markov chain Monte Carlo revolution” (Bulletin Amer. Math. Soc. 46 (2009), no. 2, 179–205). This wonderful article is a lively and engaging overview of modern methods in probability and statistics, and their applications. It opens with a fascinating real- life example: a prison psychologist turns up at Stanford University with encoded messages written by prisoners, and Marc Coram uses the Metropolis algorithm to decrypt them. From there, the article gets even more compelling! After a highly accessible description of Markov chains from fi rst principles, Diaconis colorfully illustrates many of the applications and venues of these ideas. Along the way, he points to some very interesting mathematics and some fascinating open questions, especially about the running time in concrete situ- ations of the Metropolis algorithm, which is a specifi c Monte Carlo method for constructing Markov chains. The article also highlights the use of spectral methods to deduce estimates for the length of the chain needed to achieve mixing.
    [Show full text]
  • AROUND PERELMAN's PROOF of the POINCARÉ CONJECTURE S. Finashin After 3 Years of Thorough Inspection, Perelman's Proof of Th
    AROUND PERELMAN'S PROOF OF THE POINCARE¶ CONJECTURE S. Finashin Abstract. Certain life principles of Perelman may look unusual, as it often happens with outstanding people. But his rejection of the Fields medal seems natural in the context of various activities followed his breakthrough in mathematics. Cet animal est tr`esm¶echant, quand on l'attaque, il se d¶efend. Folklore After 3 years of thorough inspection, Perelman's proof of the Poincar¶eConjecture was ¯nally recognized by the consensus of experts. Three groups of researchers not only veri¯ed its details, but also published their own expositions, clarifying the proofs in several hundreds of pages, on the level \available to graduate students". The solution of the Poincar¶eConjecture was the central event discussed in the International Congress of Mathematicians in Madrid, in August 2006 (ICM-2006), which gave to it a flavor of a historical congress. Additional attention to the personality of Perelman was attracted by his rejec- tion of the Fields medal. Some other of his decisions are also non-conventional and tradition-breaking, for example Perelman's refusal to submit his works to journals. Many people ¯nd these decisions strange, but I ¯nd them logical and would rather criticize certain bad traditions in the modern organization of science. One such tradition is a kind of tolerance to unfair credit for mathematical results. Another big problem is the journals, which are often transforming into certain clubs closed for aliens, or into pro¯table businesses, enjoying the free work of many mathemati- cians. Sometimes the role of the \organizers of science" in mathematics also raises questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the European Mathematical Society
    NEWSLETTER OF THE EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Feature History Interview ERCOM Google and Linear Algebra The ICM through History J. Morgan, A. Connes, R. Jeltsch Rényi Institute Budapest p. 10 p. 16 p. 22 p. 36 March 2007 Issue 63 ISSN 1027-488X S E European M M Mathematical E S Society TopologyJournal of It is with great pleasure that we announce the launch of the Journal of Topology, a new journal that will publish its first issue in January 2008. The Board of the Journal will be: Michael Atiyah • Martin Bridson Ralph Cohen • Simon Donaldson Nigel Hitchin • Frances Kirwan Marc Lackenby • Jean Lannes Wolfgang Lück • John Roe • Graeme Segal Ulrike Tillmann (Managing Editor) Aims and Scope The Journal of Topology will publish papers of high quality and significance in topology, geometry and adjacent areas of mathematics. Interesting, important and often unexpected links connect topology and geometry with many other parts of mathematics, and the editors welcome submissions on exciting new advances concerning such links, as well as those in the core subject areas of the journal. The Journal of Topology will appear in quarterly issues with articles posted individually online. Guidelines for Paper Submission Submissions are currently being welcomed. For information on submitting a paper, please visit www.lms.ac.uk/publications/jtop.html If you have further enquiries about the journal, please contact Susan Hezlet, Publisher LMS, at [email protected], or the Managing Editor at [email protected]. The price of the Journal for Volume 1 (four issues) including electronic access will be £300 or $570 in 2008, although we plan further discounts for libraries who take our other journals.
    [Show full text]
  • BLR 02-08-10 100+ Must-Read Books A. Biographies 1. ET Bell
    BLR 02-08-10 100+ must-read books A. Biographies 1. ET Bell: Men of Mathematics 2. Kai Bird and Martin J Sherwin: American Prometheus, Oppenheimer 3. John Cornwell: Hitler’s Scientists 4. Gerald Durell: My family and other animals 5. Richard Feynman: Perfectly reasonable deviations 6. George Gamow: Thirty years that Shook Physics 7. MK Gandhi: The story of my experiments with truth 8. James Gleick: Genius 9. Abraham Pais: Subtle is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein 10. Paris review interviews with authors 11. Munagala Venkataramaih: Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi 12. J Craig Venter: A Life Decoded; My Genome: My life B. Classics 13. Lord Byron: Prisoner of Chillon 14. Lewis Carroll: Alice’s adventure in Wonderland 15. Miguel de Cervantes: Don Quixote 16. Samuel Taylor Coleridge: Christabel 17. Charles Darwin: On the origin of species 18. Daniel Defoe: Robinson Crusoe 19. Fyodor Dostoyevsky: Crime and Punishment 20. Victor Hugo: Les Misérables 21. John Milton: Paradise lost 22. Plato: The Republic 23. William Shakespeare: Twelfth night 24. William Shakespeare: Macbeth 25. RL Stevenson: The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde 26. Jonathan Swift: Gulliver’s travel 27. Henry David Thoreau: Walden, Essay on Civil Disobedience 28. Mark Twain: The adventure of Tom Sawyer 29. HG Wells: The time machine 30. Oscar Wilde: The importance of being Ernest C. History 31. William Dalrymple: The last Mughal 32. Eric Hobsbawm: Age of extremes 33. Robert Jungk: Brighter than Thousand Suns 34. Jawaharlal Nehru: Discovery of India 35. Edward C Sachau: Alberuni’ India 36.
    [Show full text]