CD 955 r13' NO 95) A11141 -:" \ Association for Information and ImageManagement /.// 1100 Wayne Avenue. Suite 1100 Silver Spring. Maryland 20910 301/587-8202 :g0
,D0
.6
Centimeter
1 2 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 mm
2
Inches 45111112 8 0115 1.0 o 2.2 130
11112.°
1.8
1.25 1.4 1.6
,9> // S\ rt.c, MANUFACTURED TO AIIMSTANDARDS CSIJ BY APPLIED IMAGE, INC. "61', DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 351 253 SO 022 506
AUTHOR Bjerstedt, Ake, Ed. TITLE Peace/War Issues from a Psychological Perspective: A Selective Bibliography, Nr. 113. INSTITUTION Lund Univ. (Sweden). Malmo School of Education. REPORT NO ISSN-0346-5039 PUB DATE Apr 92 NOTE 47p. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131)
EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Conflict Resolution; Educational Objectives; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; Individual Development; Individual Psychology; Nuclear Warfare; *Peace; *Psychological Patterns; *Psychological Studies; *Psychology; Skill Development; Social Change; Social Science Research; War; World Affairs IDENTIFIERS *Peace Education
ABSTRACT This bibliography lists publications about the psychological aspects of war and peace, and peace education in general. Among the specific themes touched upon are psychological aspects of violent conflict resolution, psychological principles underlying effective responses to war threats, psychological effects of war and peace, and the empowerment of individuals and groups to become more involved in and effective at peace-promoting activities. Most of the listed materials are in English, with some examples from other languages also included. (M)
************************k**************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** SCOPE OF INTEREST NOTICE The ERIC Facility has assigned this document for processing to: In our udgment, this document is also of interest to the Clear inghouses noted to the right. indexing should reflect their special points of view.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 4nm document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it O Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality
Points ot view or opinions staled in this docu- ment do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy
"r:
"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." PEACE/WAR ISSUES FROM A PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE A Selective Bibliography
Editor: Ake Bjerstedt
Bjerstedt, A. (Ed.) Peace/war issues from a psychological perspective: A selective bibliography. Pedagogisk dokumentation (Malmo, Sweden: School of Education), No. 113, 1992
It is reasonable that you can be more effective and efficientas a peace educator, if you have a good knowledge of typical conceptions and other psychological prerequisites among the school pupilsor other groups you want to educate or influence. In addition, psychological componentsare important in most conflict and war situations. In this report examples of publications containing studiesor discussion related to psychological aspects of war, peace etc. and ofpeace education are listed. Among the themes touched upon are psychological aspects of violent conflict resolution, psychological principles underlying effective responses to war threats, psychological effects of war and peace, and the empowerment of individuals and groups to become more involved in and effective at peace-promoting activities. In the 80smany studies dealt with reactions to the nuclear war threat.The major focus is on materials in English from recent years, with some examples added from other language areas. A few basic publications have been marked with an asterisk (*).
Keywords: Anxiety, attitudes, bibliography, concepts,enemy images, ethnocentrism, nationality images, nuclearwar, peace, peace education, prejudice, responsibility, sex roles, stereotypes,war. 3
Abrams, H.L. Sources of human instability in the handling of nuclearweap- ons. In: Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences (Ed.). The medical implications of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986. Pp. 490-528.
Adams, D. Psychology for peace activists: Anew psychology for the generation who can abolish war. New Haven, CT: The Advocate Press, 1987.
Adams, D. The Seville Statement of Violence and why it is important. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1989, 29(3), 328-337.
Adler, K.P. Western European and American public opinionon peace, defence, and arms control in a cross-national perspective. International Social Science Journal, 1986, 38(4), 589-600. Adorno, T.W. et al. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper, 1960.
Alger, C.F. Creating global visions for peace movements. In: Boulding, E., Brigagao, C. & Clements, K. (Eds.) Peace culture and society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991. Pp. 243-260.
Allen, B.P. Defeating denial: Limited nuclearwar and the small world problem. Journal of Social Psychology, 1990, 130(5), 693-695. Allen, J. Nuclear threat as psychopathology: An interview with David Ingleby. New Ideas in Psychology, 1989, 7(2), 205-216.
Allport, G.W. The role of expectancy. In: Cantril, H. (Ed.) Tensions that cause wars. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1950. Pp. 43-48. *Allport, G.W. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison- Wesley, 1954.
Andrekus, N.J. The relationship between earlyego strength and adolescent responses to the threat of nuclear war. Berkeley, CA: California School of Professional Psycholgy. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1990, 50(7 -B), 3183-3184./
Andreyenkov, V., Robinson, J.P. & Popov, N. News mediause and adoles- cents' information about nuclear issues: A Soviet-American comparison. Journal of Communication, 1989, 39(2), 95-104.
Ardila, R. The psychological impact of the nuclear threaton the Third World: The case of Colombia. International Journal of MentalHealth, 1986, 15, 162-171. 4
Arias, R., Soifer, R. & Wainer, A. Disavowalof the danger of nuclear war: Effect of cultural factors on mental attitudes.International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 1990,17(1), 89-95. Asprea, A.M. et al. The conceptualizationof war in children. (Paper.) Tokyo: International Society for the Study ofBehavioural Development, 1987. Austin, W.G. & Worchell, S. (Eds.) The socialpsychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979.
Axelrod, L.J. & Newton, J.W. Preventing nuclear war:Beliefs and attitudes as predictors of disarmistand deterrentist behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1991, 21(1), 29-40.
Axelrod, R. The evolution of cooperation. NewYork: Basic Books, 1984. Bachman, J.G. How American high school seniorsview the military: 1976-1982. Armed Forces and Society, 1983, 10,86-104.
Bakan, D. Some philosophical propadeutics toward apsychology of war. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war and peace:The image of the enemy. New York: Plenum Press, 1991. Pp.41-58.
Bandura, A., Underwood, B. & Fromson, M.E.Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanizationof victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 1975, 9, 253-269.
Bar-Tal, D. Israf,i-Palestinian conflict: A cognitiveanalysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1990,14(1), 7-29. Bauriedl, T. Bilder gegen die Angst: Der ProzeB derAuflosung von Feindbildern. In: Vogt, W.R. (Ed.) Mut zum Frieden.Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1990. Pp. 318-333.
Beardslee, W.R. Children's and adolescents' perceptionsof the threat of nuclear war: Implications of recent studies. In: The medicalimplications of nuclear war. Washington, DC: NationalAcademy Press, 1986. Pp. 413-434. (a) Beardslee, W.R. Perceptions of the threat of nuclear war:Research and professional implications. International Journal of MentalHealth, 1986, 15, 242-252. (b)
Beresin, A.R. Toy war games and the illusion of two-sidedrhetoric. Play & Culture, 1989, 2(3), 218-224.
5 5
Berger Gold, B., Moon, S. & Van Hoorn, J. (Eds.) Growingup scared? The psychological effect of the nuclear threaton children. New York: Open Books, 1986.
Berggren, S. & Lauritzen, E. IngenjOrer och lakaremot karnvapen: Verksamhet, problem och mejligheter. Stockholm: Forskningsgruppen for utveuklings- och miljofragor, 1986.
Bergstrom, A. & Holmborg, P. -O. Vad tanker och kanner barnoch ung- dom infOr atombombshot och kapprustning? Stockholm: Foreningen Svenska lakare mot karnvapen, 1984.
Bernstein, J.S. Power and politics: The psychology of Soviet-American partnership. Boston, MA: Shambala Publications, 1989.
Bernstein, M. Coping with serious threat: Conflict theory andthe decision to support alternatives to the nuclear arms race. New Haven, CT: Yale University. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1986, 47(6-B),2669./
Biggers, P.J. The development and analysis of normativeinstruments which assess pre-adult cognitive and attitudinal orientationsto selected war and peace concepts. (Ph. D.) Tallahassee, FL: Florida State Uni- versity, 1972. (Order No. 73-10, 321.)
Billesbolle, P. et al. Borns angst for krig med kernevaben.Ugeskrift for lager, 1986, /48, 731-734.
Bjerstedt, A. Reduction of "barrier tendencies" duringexperience of international co-living: Psychological control studies of certainaspects in the CISV socio-educational approach. Acta psychologica,1958, 13, 329-346.
Bjerstedt, A. A study of dyadic communication in internationalsettings. In: Glimpses from the world of the school child. New York:Beacon House, 1960. Pp. 87-127. (a)
Bjerstedt, A. "Ego-involved world-mindedness", nationalityimages, and methods of research. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1960,4, 185-192. (b)
Bjerstedt, A. Informational and non-informational determinantsof na- tionality stereotypes. The Journal of Social Issues, 1962, 18,24-29.
Bjerstedt, A. Explorations ofenemy images using an associative technique. Educational and Psychological Interactions, No. 95, 1989. 6
Bjerstedt, A. Conceptions of the futureand education for responsibility. Peace Education Reports, No. 4, 1992. Bjerstedt, A. et al. Enemy images amonguniversity students in four countries: A cross-national explorationusing an associative technique. Peace, Environment and Education,1991, 2(3), 13-31. Bjurwill, C. Framtidsforestallningar:Analys och tolkning av 900 ele- vers uppsatseroch semantiska skattningar. (Studiapsychologica et paedagogica, 84.) Malmo: Liber, 1986. Blackwell, P.L. & Gessner, J.C. Fearand trembling: An inquiry into adolescent perceptions of living in thenuclear age. Youth and Society, 1983, 15, 237-255.
Blight, J.G. Toward a policy-relevantpsychology of avoiding nuclear war: Lessons for psychologists from the Cubanmissile crisis. American Psy- chologist, 1987, 42(1), 12-29.
Blinnika, L.M. Personal, national and globalimage of the future in adult- hood,. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,1987, 28(1), 35-41. Blumberg, H.H. Attitude formation andinternational conflict. Interna- tional and Intercultural Communication Annual,1990, 14, 56-74. Blumberg, H.H. & French, C.C. (Eds.) Peace:Abstracts of the psycho- logical and behavioral literature 1967-1990.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992. Boehnke, K. et .al. Leben unter atomarerBedrohung zur Bedeutung existentieller AAngste im Jugendalter. Gruppendynamik,1988, 19, 429- 452. Boenke, K. et al. How West Germanadolescents experience the nuclear threat. Political Psychology, 1989, 10(3),419-443.
Boenke, K., von Fromberg, E. & Macpherson,M.J. Makro-sozialer Stress im Jugendalter: Ergebnisse einer Wiederbefragung zuKriegsangst und Angst vor Umweltzerstorung. Praxis derKinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 1991, 40(6), 204-213. Boone, R. et al. Psychological effects ofnuclear developments. Los Angeles: California State Psychological AssociationTask Force on Psy- chologists for Social Responsibility, 1983.
7 7
Borg, A., Hultman, E. & Waern, Y. Conflict resolution and social under- standing in six to twelve year old boys. Rep. Dep. Psychol., Univer. Stockholm, No. 481, 1976.
Borgenicht, L. Threat in the nuclearage: Children's responses to the nuclear arms debate. School Psychology International, 1985, 6, 187-193. Bosowski, E.F. Two comparative studies of student views of the world. (Paper.) Upper Montclair, NJ: Middle States Division of theAsso- ciation of American Geographers, 1982.
Boughton, R.C. et al. Australian children and the threat of nuclearwar. The Medical Journal of Australia, 1987, /47, 121-124. Boulding, E. The child and nonviolent social change. In: Charny, I.W. (Ed.) Strategies against violence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1978. Pp. 68-99.
Boulding, E. Perspectives of women researcherson disarmament, national security and world order. Women Studies International Quarterly, 1981, 4, 27-40.
Boulding, E. Fran vision till verklighet. (Fredsarsdelegationens skriftserie, 2.) Stockholm: Fredsarsdelegationen, 1986.
Boulding, E. Two cultures of religionas obstacles to peace. Zygon Journal of Religion and Science, 1986, 21(4), 501-518.
Boulding, E. Image and action inpeace building. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 17-37.
Boulding, K.E. National images and internationalsystems. Journal of Con- flict Resolution, 1959, 3, 120-131.
Boulding, K.E. The nature andcauses of national and military self-images in relation to peace and war. In: Kliot, N. & Waterman, S.(Eds.) The political geography of conflict and peace. London: Belhaven Press, 1991. Pp. 142-152.
Bradley, M. Psychologicalprocesses increasing the risks of accidental nuclear war. In: Proceedings of the Congress of EuropeanPsychologists for Peace. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society,1987. Pp. 155-167.
Brockett, C.D. A Kohlbergian approach to internationaldistribution justice: A comparison of the shared humanity and interdependenceperspectives. Political Psychology, 1986, 7(2), 349-367.
8 8
Brockner, J. & Rubin, J.Z. The social psychology ofconflict escalation and entrapment. New York: Springer,1985. Brock-Utne, B. Feminist perspectives on peace and peaceedacatioh. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989. Brock-Utne, B. The raising of a peaceful boy. Peace,Environment and Education, 1991, 2(1), 3-12. Bronfenbrenner, U. The mirror-image in Soviet-Americanrelations. In: White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the preventionof nuclear war. New York: New York University Press, 1986. Pp. 71-81. Bronstein, P.A. & Quina, K. (Eds.) Teaching apsychology of people: Resources for gender and sociocultural awareness.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1988.
Brown, B.R. & Rubin, J.Z. The social psychology ofbargaining and nego- tiation. New York: Academic Press, 1975. Brown, S. The causes and prevention of war. NewYork: St. Martin's Press, 1987. Buban, M.E. et al. Children's fears of nuclear war: Groupintervention strategies. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1988, 13(3),124-129.
Budzinski, M. et al. Ausliinder: Argumente gegen alltliglicheVorurteile. Tiibingen: Verein fur Friedenspadagogik, 1982. Burn, S.M. & Oskamp, S. Ingroup biases and theU.S.-Soviet conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 73-89. Burstermann, J.P. & Noar, G. Let's listen to our children andyouth. In: Henderson, G. (Ed.) Education for peace. Washington, DC:ASCD, 1973. Pp. 63-88.
Buttner, C. Kriegsangst bei Kindern. Munchen: Kosel-Verlag,1982. Buttner, C. Children's war fantasies. Journal of Psychohistory,1983, 10, 491-510. &tuner, C. Kinder und Krieg: Zum ptidagogischen Umgang mitHaft und Feindseligkeit. Mainz: Griinewald, 1991. Caldicott, H. Missile envy: The arms race and nuclear war. NewYork: Morrow, 1984. 9
Cantor, L, Wilson, B.J. & Hoffner, C. Emotionalresponses to a televised nuclear holocaust film. Communication Research, 1986,13(2), 257-277. Cantril, H. (Ed.) Tensions thatcause wars. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1950.
Cantril, H., Buchanan, W. et al. How nationssee each other. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1953.
Carlsson-Paige, N. & Levin, D.E. Young children andwar play. Educa- tional Leadership, 1987/88, 45(4), 80-84.
Cela, E.P. Psicologia e nonviolenza. Torino: Edizioni Gruppo Abele,1991. Chandler, M.A. Developing ameasure of nuclear war anxiety: A factor analytic study. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 1991, 16(2), 39-63.
Chelcea, S. & Dragomirescu, I. Peace in the valuesystem of young workers. Revue Roumaine des Sciences SocialesSerie de Psychologie, 1988, 32(2), 113-117.
Children's fears of war: Hearing before the Select Committeeon Children, Youth, and Families. Washington, DC: U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office, 1983.
Chilstrom, G.A. Psychological aspects of the nucleararms race. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1984, 24(3), 39-54.
Chilstrom, G.A. The nucleararms threat: Psychosocial correlates of atti- tudes and behavioral response. San Diego, CA: California Schoolof Professional Psychology. /Dissertation Abstracts International,1986, 46(8-B), 2800./
Chimienti, G., Nasr, J.A. & Kalifeh, I. Children's reactionsto war- related stress: Affective symtoms and behaviour problems.Social Psy- chiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1989, 24(6), 282-287.
Chivian, E. et al. Soviet children and the threat of nuclearwar. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1985, 55, 484-502.
Chivian, E. et al. American and Soviet teenagers'concerns about nuclear war and the future. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 319, 407- 413.
Christiansen, B. Attitudes towards foreign affairsas a function of per- sonality. Oslo: Oslo University Press, 1959.
10 10
Christie, D.J. & Nelson, L. Student reactions to nuclear education. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1988, 44(6), 22-23. Clark, A.W., Trahair, R.C. & Graetz, B.R. Social Darwinism: A determi- nant of nuclear arms policy and action. Human Relations,1989, 42, 289- 303. Cohen, S.P. et al. Evolving intergroup techniques for conflict resolution: An Israeli-Palestinian pilot workshop. Journal of Social Issues, 1977, 33(1), 165-189. Conn, S.A. Protest and thrive: The relationship between global responsi- bility and personal empowerment. New England Journal of Public Policy, 1990, 6(1), 163-177. Cooper, P. The development of the concept of war. Journal of Peace Research, 1965, 2, 1-16.
Crabb, P.B. & Rosnow, R.L. What is aggressive? Some contextual factors in judging international behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 1988, 14(2), 105-112. Cretu, T. Peace and its most obvious meanings in preschool children's drawings. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales (Serie de Psychologie), 1988, 32(1), 97-99. Cross, T.P. & Saxe, L. The Day After: Report of a survey of effects of viewing and beliefs about nuclear war. (Paper.) Toronto: American Psychological Association, 1984.
Davidson, J.A. & Newman, M. Australian perceptions of the nuclear arms race: A conflict of interests or a misunderstanding? Australian Psy- chologist, 1990, 25(1), 15-24.
Davies, R. Children and the threat of nuclear war. Lancaster, UK: Centre for Peace Studies, S. Martin's College, 1984.
Davies, R. Hopes and fears: Children's attitudes to nuclear war. Lancaster, UK: Centre for Peace Studies, S. Martin's College, 1987. Der-Karabetian, A. et al. Parental anti-nuclear activism and children's response to the nuclear threat. (Paper.) Long Beach, CA: Western Psy- chological Association, 1987. Deschamps, J.-C. & Brown, R. Superordinate goals and intergroup con- flict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1983, 22, 189-195.
11 11
Deutsch, K.W. Nationalism and its alternatives. New York: Knopf, 1969.
Deutsch, M. Socially relevant science: Reflections on some studies of inter- personal conflict. American Psychologist, 1969, 24,1076 -1092. Deutsch, M. The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.
Deutsch, M. Conflict resolution: Theory and practice. Political Psychology, 1983, 4, 431-453. (a)
Deutsch, M. The prevention of World War HI: A psychologicalperspec- tive. Political Psychology, 1983, 4(1), 3-31. (b)
Deutsch, M. Educating beyong hate. Peace, Environment and Education, 1991, 3(4), 3-19.
Diamond, G. & Bachman, J. High school seniors and the nuclear threat, 1975-1984. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 210-241.
Diamond, G. & Bachman, J.G. Nuclear despair and nuclearconcern among U.S. high school seniors and recent graduates. (Paper.) San Fransisco, CA: International Society of Political Psychology, 1987.
Dieckmann, H. Gedanken Ober den Begriff des "Feindbildes". Analytische Psychologie, 1986,17(1), 25-37. Dinklage, R.I. American and German children's perception ofwar and peace: A photo-communication approach. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, 1986.
Dinklage, R.I. & Ziller, R.C. Explicating cognitive conflict through photo- communication: The meaning of war andpeace in Germany and the United States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1989, 33, 309-317.
Doctor, R.M. et al. Self-reports of Soviet and American childrenon worry about the threat of nuclear war. Political Psychology, 1988, 7, 13-23.
Doctor, R.M., Goldenring, J.M. & Powell, A. Adolescents' attitudes about nuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1987, 60, 599-614.
Doob, L.W. Patriotism and nationalism: Their psychological foundations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964. Druckman, D. (Ed.) Negotiations: Social psychological perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977.
12 12
Druckman, D. The social psychology of arms control and reciprocation. Political Psychology, 1990, / / (3), 553-581.
Dyal, J.A. & Morris, P. Issue salience, nuclear anxiety, and mental health. (Paper.) Hamilton, Canada: Canadian Peace Research and Education Association, 1987. Dyal, J.A., Morris, P. & McKenzie-Mohr, D. Nuclear anxiety and issue- relevant behavior: Associations with mental health. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1990, 5(5), 243-262. Early-Adams, P. et al. Coping in the nuclear age: The practitioner's role. Families in Society, 1990, 71(9), 558-562.
Easlea, B. Fathering the unthinkable: Masculinity, scientists and the nuclear arms race. London: Pluto Press, 1983. Eckhardt, W. Attitudes of Canadian peace groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1972,16, 341-352. (a) Eckhardt, W. Crosscultural theories of war and aggression. International Journal of Group Tensions, 1972, 2(3), 36-51. (b) Eckhardt, W. War/Peace attitudes, events and values. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 1983,14, 187-189. Eckhardt, W. Making and breaking enemy images. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 1991, 22(1), 87-95. Eckhardt, W. & Alcock, N.Z. Ideology and personality in war/peace atti- tudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 1970, 81(1), 105-116.
Eckhardt, W. & Lentz, T.F. Factors of war/peace attitudes. Peace Research Reviews, 1967, 1(5). /Rev. ed., 1971./ Ehrlich, P.R. et al. The cold and the dark: The world after nuclear war. New York: Norton, 1984. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. Krieg and Frieden aus der Sicht der Verhaltens- forschung. (2. Aufl.) Miinchen: Piper, 1984.
Elsasser, G. Fdrsvarsvilja och framtidstro. Stockholm: The National Board for Psychological Defence, 1987. Elworthy, S. The assumptions behind nuclear weapons decisions and our role in changing them. In: Nakarada, R. & Oberg, J. (Eds.) Surviving together. Lund: LUPRI, 1989. Pp. 19-29.
13 13
EngestrOm, Y. War in the imagination of Finnish school children. Current Research on Peace and Violence (Tampere Peace Research Institute), 1978, I,91-103.
English, R.D. & Halperin, J.J. The other side: How Soviets and Americans perceive each other. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1987. Ensel, F.-J. Richtige Angst und falsche Furcht: Psychologische Friedens- vorbereitung und der Beitrag der Plidagogik. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1984.
Erikson, E.H. Pseudospeciation in the nuclearage. Political Psychology, 1985, 6, 213-217.
Escalona, S.K. Growing up with the threat of nuclearwar. American Jour- nal of Orthopsychiatry, 1982, 52, 600-607. Etzioni, A. Social-psychological aspects of international relations. In: Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.) The handbook of social psychology. (2nd ed.) Vol. 5. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969. Pp. 538-601. Evan, W.M. The arms race and nuclearwar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
Falk, A. & Selg, H. Die Begriffe "Krieg" und "Frieden" in der Vorstellung von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unter- richt, 1982, 29, 353-358.
Falk, R.A. & Lifton, R.J. Indefensibleweapons: The political and psycho- logical case against militarism. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
Fenton, I. (Ed.) The psychology of nuclear conflict. London: Coventure, 1986.
Fernald, M.C. Hope, connectedness, and action: Responses of adolescents and young adults to the threat of nuclearwar. Chapel Hill, NC: Uni- versity of North Carolina. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1986, 46(11-B), 4010-4011.)
Feshbach, S. Psychology, human violence, and the search forpeace: Issues in science and human values. Journal of Social Issues, 1990, 46(1),183- 198.
Feshbach, S., Kandel, E. & Haist, F. Attitudes toward nucleararmament policies: An example of social research in behalf of social advocacy. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 107-126.
14 14
Finison, L.J. The Society for the PsychologicalStudies of Social Issues, peace action, and theoriesof conflict: 1936-1950. American Psycholo- gist, 1983, 38, 1250-1252.
Fischer, P.A. The effect of self-confrontationinstruction on students' value priorities and attitude toward war and peace.New York: Fordham University. /Dissertation Abstract International,1984, 45(1-A), 123./ Fischer, R.J. Third party consultation as a methodof intergroup conflict resolution: A review of studies. Journal of ConflictResolution, 1983, 27, 301-334. Fisher, R. & Ury, W. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreementwithout giving in. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin,1981. Fiske, S.T. People's reactions to nuclear war:Implications for psychol- ogists. American Psychologist, 1987, 42, 207-217.
Fiske, S.T., Pratto, F. & Pavelchak, M.A. Citizens'images of nuclear war: Content and consequences. Journal of Social Issues,1983, 39(1), 42-65.
Flohr, A.K. Feindbilder in der internationalen Politik:Ihre Entstehung and ihre Funktion. Mtinster: Lit-Verlag, 1991. Flordh, C., Westin, C. & Wilhelmson, L. Fredsforskning urpsykologisk synvinkel -- en litteraturdversikt. Stockholm: Pedagogiskainstitutionen, 1967. Fogg, R.W. Some effects of teaching adolescents some creative,peaceful approaches for resolving international conflicts. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University. /Dissertation Abstracts International,1973, 33(8-A), 4054./ Fogg, R.W. Dealing with conflict: A repertoireof creative, peaceful approaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1985, 29, 330-358.
Folberg, J. & Taylor, A. Mediation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,1984.
Fox, D.L. & Schofield, J.W. Issue salience, perceivedefficacy and per- ceived risk: A study of the origins of anti-nuclear waractivity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1929, 19(10), 805-827.
Frank, J.D. Sanity and survival in the nuclear age: Psychological aspectsof war and peace. New York: RandomHouse, 1982. Frank, J.D. Nuclear arms and prenuclear leaders: Sociopsychological as- pects of the nuclear arms race. Political Psychology,1983, 4, 393-408. 15 15
Frank, J.D. Prospects for world peace: Sociopsychological consideration. American Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1985, 5(2), 11-16.
Frank, J.D. Psychological responses to the threat of nuclear annihilation. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 65-71. Frank, J.D. The drive for power and conceptual inertia. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 1989, 17, 347-357.
Frank, J.D. & Melville, A.Y. The image of the enemy and theprocess of change. In: Gromyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough: Emerging new thinking. New York: Walker, 1988. Pp. 199-208. Frank, J.D. & Rivard, J.C. Antinuclear admirals: An interview study. Political Psychology, 1986, 7(1), 23-52.
Frankenhaeuser, M. Human fallibility and the risk of nuclearwar by mis- take. In: Proceedings of the Congress of European Psychologists for Peace. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society, 1987. Pp. 10-21. Frankenhaeuser, M. To err is human: Nuclearwar by mistake? In: Gromyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough: Emergingnew thinking. New York: Walker, 1988. Pp. 53-60.
Fredsarbete under fOrintelsehot. (Special issue of:) Kritisk Psykologi, 1985, 40(3-4).
Frei, D. Risks of unintentional nuclearwar. Totowa, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun, 1983.
French, C.C. Psychological aspects of the nucleararms threat: An annotated bibliography. Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, 1984, 2, 247-273.
French, C.C. Psychological aspects of the nucleararms threat: Annotated bibliography update, I-IV. Psychological Reports, 1989, 65, 403-425, 1099-1119, 1299-1322; 1990, 66, 71-93.
French, P.L. & van Hoorn, J. Halfa nation saw nuclear war and nobody blinked? Reassessment of the impact of The Day After interms of a theo- retical chain of causality. International Journal of Mental Health,1986, 15, 276-297.
Frindte, W. Der Friede beginnt auch in den Kopfen: Padagogischeand psy- chologische Aspekte der Friedensfahigkeit. In: Entmilitarisierung? Ber- lin: Brandenburgisches Verlagshaus, 1990. Pp. 251-268.
16 16
Fromm, E. The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt,Rine- hart & Winston, 1973. Fuld, K. & Nevin, J.A. Why doesn't everyman work to prevent nuclear war? A decision theory analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1988, /8(1), 59-65. Galperin, M., Holt, R.R. & Howells, P. What Soviet emigre adolescents think about nuclear war. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 1-12. Galtung, J. Schooling, education, and the future. Didakometry & Socio- metry, 1982, 14(1-2). Garbarino, J., Kostelny, K. & Dubrow, N. What children can tell us about living in danger. American Psychologist, 1991, 46(4), 376-383.
Gilbert, G.M. (Ed.) Psychological approaches to intergroup and interna- tional understanding. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1956. Gilbert, R.K. The dynamics of inaction: Psychological factors inhibiting arms control activism. American Psychologist, 1988, 43,755-764. Gillies, P. A longitudinal study of the hopes and worries of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 1989,12(1), 69-81.
Glad, B. (Ed.) Psychological dimensions of war. London: Sage, 1990.
Goldberg, S. et al. Thinking about the threat of nuclear war: Relevance to mental health. American Journal of Ortopsychiatry, 1985, 55, 503-512.
Goldenring, J.M. & Doctor, R.M. California adolescents' concerns about the threat of nuclear war. In: Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of the threat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston, MA: IPPNW, 1985. Pp. 112-133. Goldenring, J.M. & Doctor, R.M. Teen-age worry about nuclear war: North American and European questionnaire studies. International Jour- nal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 72-92. Goodman, L.A. et al. The threat of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race: Adolescent experience and perceptions. Political Psychology, 1983, 4, 510-530.
Goodman, L.M. & Hoff, L.A. Omnicide: The nuclear dilemma. New York: Praeger, 1990.
1 7 17
Gordon, H. Buberian Learning Groups: Existentialist philosophyas an Ariadne thread for education for peace. Teachers College Record, 1983, 85(1), 73-87. (a)
Gordon, H. Existentialist writings and the enhancing of trust: A method developed in Buberian Learning Groups. Israel Social Science Research, 1983, 1(1), 65-78. (b)
Gould, B.B., Moon, S. & van Hoorn, J. (Eds.) Growingup scared? The psychological effect of the nuclear threaton children. New York: Open Books, 1986.
Gould, J. Exploring youth's reaction to the threat of nuclearwar. In: Gould, B.B., Moon, S. & van Hoorn, J. (Eds.) Growingup scared? New York: Open Books, 1986. Pp. 49-56.
Graudenz, I. & Randoll, D. Erleben der atomaren Bedrohung bei jungen Erwachsenen: Uberpriifung eines als interkulturell angelegten Frage- bogens. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 1988, 35, 180-187. Greenwald, D.S. & Zeitlin, S.J. Noreason to talk about it: Families confront the nuclear taboo. New York: Norton, 1987.
Grinspoon, L. (Ed.) The long darkness: Psychological and moralperspec- tives on nuclear winter. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.
Groznyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough: Emergingnew thinking. New York: Walker & Moscow: Progress Publ., 1988.
Gugel, G. Auslander, Aussiedler, Obersiedler: Fremdenfeindlichkeitin der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Tubingen: Verein fur Friedenspadagogik, 1.990.
Gugel, G. "Ich denke immeran diesen bloden Krieg": Was Sie fiber die Angst ihrer Kinder vor Krieg und die Wirkungvon Kriegs- und Ge- waltdarstellungen wissen sollten. Tiibingen: Verein fiir Friedenspada- gogik, 1991.
Gopfert, H. Auslandeifeindlichkeit durch Unterricht. DUsseldorf:Schwann, 1985.
Haas, M.E. War and peace: The students' views. Journal ofResearch & De- velopment in Education, 1986,19(3), 84-89.
Haavelsrud, M. Views on war andpeace among students in West Berlin public shools. Journal of Peace Research, 1970, 7, 99-120.
18 18
Haavelsrud, M. Ansichten von Kindem und Jugendlichen fiber Krieg und Frieden. Bildung und Wissenschaft, 1972, 25(3),29-43. Hamilton, D.L. & Rose, T.L. Illusory correlation and themaintenance of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 1980, 39, 832-845. Hamilton, S.B. et al. In the eye of the beholder: Accountingfor variability in attitudes and cognitive/affective reactionstoward the threat of nuclear war. Journal of AppliedSocial Psychology, 1987, 17, 927-952. Hamilton, S.B. et al. Nuclear war as a source of adolescent worry:Rela- tionships with age, gender, trait emotionality, and drug use.Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 128, 745-763.
Hamilton, S.B. et al. Relationships between the life valuesof U.S. college students and their cognitive/affective responses to thethreat of nuclear war. Journal of Adolescence,1989, 12(1), 55-68. Hamilton, S.B., Chavez, E.L. & Keilin, W.G. Thoughts ofArmageddon: The relationship between nuclear threat attitudes andcognitive/emotional responses. International Journal of MentalHealth, 1986,15, 189-207. Hamilton, S.B., Keilin, W.G. & Knox, T.A. Thinking about theunthink- able: The relationship between death anxiety andcognitive/emotional responses to the threat of nuclear war.Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 1987 - 88,18(1), 53-61. Hamilton, S.B., Knox, T.A. & Keilin, W.G. The nuclear family:Cor- respondence in cognitive and affective reactions to the threat of nuclear war among older adolescents andtheir parents. Journal of Youth & Adolescents, 1986,15, 133-145. (a)
Hamilton, S.B., Knox, T.A. & Keilin, W.G. Relationship betweenfamily socioeconomic status and cognitive/affective responses to the threat of nuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1986, 58, 247-250. (b)
Hare, A.P. & Naveh, D. Creative problem solving: Camp DavidSummit, 1978. Small Group Behavior, 1985,16(2), 123-138.
Harman., W. How to think about peace (and feel empowered to do some-
,t> thing about it). Organization Development Journal, 1986, 4(4), 42-48.
Harris, I.M. The role of social conditioning in male violence. In:Boulding, E. et al. (Eds.) Peace culture and society. Boulder, CO: WestviewPress, 1991. Pp. 166-176.
19 19 Harris, R.A., Proskansky, H.M. & Roskin, E. Some attitudes of college students concerning the hydrogen bomb. Journal of Psychology, 1956, 42, 29-33.
Harvey, C.B., Howell, D. & Colthorpe, P. Canadian adolescents'concerns in the nuclear age. Canadian Counselor, 1985,19(2), 53-62.
Haste, H. Everybody's scared-- but life goes on: Coping, defence and action in the face of nuclear threat. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1), 11-26.
Hawkes, G.W. What about the children? The threat of nuclearwar and our responsibility to preserve this planet for future generations. Moretown, VT: Parents and Teachers for Social Responsibility, 1983.
Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Hesse, P. Children's and adolescents' fears of nuclearwar: Is our sense of the future disappearing? International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 93-113.
Hesse, P. & Mack, J.E. The world isa dangerous place: Images of the enemy on children's television. Cambridge, MA: Center for Psycholog- ical Studies in the Nuclear Age, 1987.
Hesse, P. & Poklemba, D. The stranger withgreen feet and black piggy toes: Young children's conceptions of the enemy. Cambridge, MA: Center for Psychological Studies in the Nuclear Age, 1987.
Hesse, P. & The Project "Preparedness for Peace". Enemy images,develop- mental psychology, and peace education. Peace Education Miniprints, No. 29, 1992.
Hinde, R.A. Human aggression: Biological propensities and socialforces. In: Smoker, P., Davies, R. & Munske, B. (Eds.) A reader inpeace studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990. Pp. 172-181.
Hofmann, C. (Ed.) Die Kinder, der Krieg and die Angst.Ravensburg: Ravensburger Verlag, 1991.
Hollin, C.R. Concern about the threat of nuclearwar: Just another worry? Anxiety Research, 1991, 4(1), 51-60.
Holmberg, P.O. & Bergstrom, A. How Swedishteenagers think and feel concerning the nuclear threat. In: Solantaus, T.et al. (Eds.) Impact of the threat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston, MA:IPPNW, 1985. Pp. 170-180.
20 20
Holsti, O.R. Perceptions of time, perceptions of alternatives,and patterns of communication as factors in crisis decision-making. In: PeaceResearch Society, Papers, Vol. III. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1965. Pp.79-120.
Holsti, O.R. Crisis management. In: Glad, B. (Ed.) Psychologicaldimen- sions of war. London: Sage, 1990. Pp. 116-142. Holsti, O.R., I -ody, R.A. & Worth, R.C. Measuring affectand action in international reaction models. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.)Peace Research Society, Papers, Vol. II. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1965.Pp. 170- 190.
Holt, R.R. Can psychology meet Einstein's challenge?Political Psychology, 1984, 5, 199-225. Holt, R.R. On the relevance of psychology to preventing war.American Psychologist, 1988, 43(4), 323-325.
Holt, R.R. College students definitions and images of enemies.Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 33-50.
Holt, R.R. & Silverstein, B. (Eds.) The image of the enemy: U.S.views of the Soviet Union. (Special issue of): Journal of Social Issues, 1989,45(2).
van Hoorn, J., le Veck, P. & French, P.Transitions in the nuclear age: Late adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1), 41-53.
Howell, S. & Willis, R. (Eds.) Societies at peace: Anthropological perspec- tives. New York: Routledge, 1989.
van Ijzendoom, M.H. Moraljudgment and concern about nuclear war. Youth and Society, 1987,18(3), 282-301. van Ijzendoom, M.H. The relation of moraljudgment to authoritarianism, sexism, ethno-centrism and concern about nuclear war. Journal of Moral Education, 1990,19(1), 38-47.
*Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. The medical implica- tions of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986.
Intriligator, M.D. & Brito, D.L. The potential contribution of psychology to nuclear war issues. American Psychologist, 1988, 43, 318-321. Jacobs, M.S. American psychology in the guest for nuclear peace. New York: Praeger, 1989.
21 21 Jacobsen, B. Krigen, freden og danskerne: En unders0gelse of voksne danskeres epfattelse of internationale forhold. Copenhagen: Ejlers, 1988.
Jahoda, G. & Harrison, S. Belfast children: Some effects of a conflict en- vironment. Irish Journal of Psychology, 1975, 3(1), 1-19.
Janis, I.L. Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
Janis, I.L. Problems of international ',Isis management in the nuclear age. Journal of Social Issues, 1986, 42(2), 201-220.
Jensen, J.P. "Jeg er ikke racist, men ..."Orn foraomme og fjendebilleder. Psykologi, 1989, (21), 5-16.
Jensen, J.P., Jacobsen, B. & Keldorff, S. Contribution to a psychology for peace for a consciousness and action against war. Tidskrift for Nordisk Forening for Pedagogisk Forskning, 1982, 2(4), 34-45. Jensen, M.P. Gender, sex roles, and attitudes toward war and nuclear weapons. Sex Roles, 1987, 17, 253-267. Jervis, R. The logic of images in international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.
Jervis, R. Perception and misperc-ption in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976. Jervis, R., Lebow, R.N. & Stein, J.G. Psychology and deterrence. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985. Johnson, D.W. & Johnsor., F.P. Joining together. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. Creative conflict. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co., 1987.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. Cooperation and competition. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co., 1989.
Johnson, R.N. et al. Attitudes concerning nuclear war in Finland and in the United States. iVgressive Behavior, 1986, 12, 155-166.
Jones, R.A. Self-fulfilling prophecies. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaurn, 1977.
Jones, V. Attitude of college students and their changes: A 37-year study. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1970, 81(1), 3-80. 22 *Kahnert, M., Pitt, D. & Taipale, I. (Eds.) Children and war. Helsinki: Peace Union of Finland, 1983. Kanani Hendijani, B. College of education students' attitudes toward selected international problems. (Ph.D.) Denton, TX: North Texas State University, 1983. Kanofsky, S. The possibility of nuclear war: Appraisal, coping, and emotional response. Berkeley, CA: California School of Professional Psychology. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1990, 50(8-B), 3759./ Kaplowitz, N. National se'rages, perception of enemies, and conflict strategies: Psychopoliticai dimensions of international relations. Political Psychology, 1990, 11(1), 39-82.
Kara, K. & Rehak, J. War and peace as conceived in various social groups. In: Ornauer, H. et al. (Eds.). Images of the world in the year 2000. The Hague: Mouton, 1976. PT?. 317-352.
Katz, D., Kelman, H.C. & Vassiliou, V. A comparative approach to the study of nationalism. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.) Peace Research Society, Papers, Vol. XIV. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1970. Pp. 1-13.
Keen, S. Faces of the enemy: Reflections of the hostile imagination. New York: Harper, 1.986. Keldorff, S. Hvo,for krig? Kommentarer till en ny kold krig. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 1986. Keldorff, S. Holdninger till kaprustning og bekymring for atomkrig. Gistrup, Denmark: Edupax, 1989. Keldorff, S. The image of the enemyfrom an external, military to an internal, civilian enemy. Educational and Psychological Interactions, No. 108, 1991.
Kelman, H.C. (Ed.) International behavior. New York: Holt, 1965.
Kelman, H.C. The role of the individual in international relations: Some conceptual and methodological considerations. Journal of International Affairs, 1970, 24(1), 1-17. Kelman, H.C. The problem-solving workshop in conflict resolution. In: Merritt, R.L. (Ed.) Communication in international politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1972.
23 23
Kelman, H.C. The political psychology of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: How can we overcome the barriers to a negotiated solution? Political Psychology, 1987, 8, 347-363.
Kelman, H.C. & Bloom, A. Assumptive frameworks in intenational politics. In: Knutson, J. (Ed.) Handbook of political psychology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1973.
*Kelman, H.C. & Hamilton, V.L. Crimes of obedience: Towarda social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale Uni- versity Press, 1989.
Kemp, G. The art of war. In: Smoker, P., Davies, R. & Munske, B. (Eds.) A reader in peace studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990. Pp. 182-190.
Kierulff, S. Belief in "Armageddon Theology" and willingness to risknu- clear war. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1991, 30(1), 81- 93.
Kirkland, F.R. Childhood, psychopathology, and the Gulf War. Journal of Psychohistory, 1991, 19(1), 57-65.
Klineberg, 0. Tensions affecting international understanding: Asurvey of research. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1950.
Klineberg, 0. The human dimension in international relations. New York: Holt, 1964.
Klineberg, 0. Public opinion and nuclearwar. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 1245-1253.
Klineberg, 0. Children and nuclear war: A methodologicalnote. Interna- tional Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15,253-260.
Klineberg, 0. The contributions of psychology to international understand- ing: Problems and possibilities. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war and peace: The image of theenemy. New York: Plenum Press, 1991. Pp. 71-83.
Kloep, M. Prejudice and peace: Is the Swedish youth neutral in its attitudes? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1991, 32(1), 31-37. Kramer, B.M. & Moyer, R.S. (Eds.) Nuclear psychology bibliography. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 1990.
24 24 Kriesberg, L. The sociology of social conflict. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Kristiansen, K.K. & Rasmussen, J.R. (Eds.) Fjendebilleder og fremmedhad. Copenhagen: FN-forbundet, 1988.
Kull, S. Mind-sets of defense policy-makers. Psychohistory Review, 1986, 14(3), 21-37. Kull, S. Minds at war: Nuclear reality and the inner conflicts ofYense policymakers. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
L'Abate, A. Research as a tool for peace education. In: Bjerstedt,rte. (Ed.) Peace education: Glimpses from the EUPRA Conference in Firenze. Malmo, Sweden: School of Education, 1992. Pp. 5-14.
LaFarge, P. The Strangelove legacy: Children, parents, and teachers in Le nuclear age. New York: Harper, 1987. Lambert, W.E. & Klineberg, 0. Children's views of foreign peoples. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967. Landahl, P.-A. Om sanningen skall fram: Det psykologiska forsvaret i Sverige under 35 dr. Stockholm: Styrelsen for psykologiskt forsvar, 1989.
Lange, A. & Westin, C. Etnisk diskriminering och social identitet. Stock- holm: Liber, 1981. Larsen, K.S. Attitudes toward nuclear disarmament and their correlates. Journal of Social Psychology, 1985, 125(1), 17-21. Lasker, G. Race attitudes in children. New York: Holt, 1929. (Reprint: Greenwood Press, 1968.) Laszlo, E. & Keys, D. (Eds.) Disarmament: The human factor. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.
Lavik, N.J. Contributions from psychiatry on the peace-war issue. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 1989, 20, 157-165. Lebow, R.N. & Stein, J.G. Beyond deterrence. Journal of Social Issues, 1987, 43(4), 5-71.
Lentz, T.F. Towards a science of peace. London: Halcyon Press, 1955.
25 25 Levine, H.B., Jacobs, D. & Rubin, L.J. (Eds.) Psychoanalysis and the nuclear threat: Clinical and theoretical studies. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1988. Le Vine, R.A. & Campbell, D.T. Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: Wiley, 1972. Levinger, G. Beyond deterrence. (Special issue of:) Journal of Social Issues, 1987, 43(4).
Leviton, D. (Ed.) Horrendous death and health: Toward action. New York: Hemisphere, 1991.
Levy, S.G. & Hefner, R. Multidimensional scaling of inteiaational atti- tudes. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.) Peace Research Society, Papers, Vol. I. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1964. Pp. 129-165. Lewis, C., Goldberg, S. & Parker, K.R. Nuclear worries of Canadian youth: Replication and extension. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1989, 59(4), 520-527. Lidin-Jansson, G. & Cederblom, S. (Eds.) Karnvapen i psykologiskt perspektiv. Angered, Sweden: Svenska lakare mot kamvapen, 1982. Lifton, R.J. Death in life: Survivors of Hiroshima. New York: Random House, 1967.
Lifton, R.J. Beyond nuclear numbing. Teachers College Record, 1982, 84, 15-29.
Lifton, R.J. A nuclear ethos: Ten psychological-ethical principles. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1985, 25(4), 39-40.
Lifton, R.J. The future of immortality and otheressays for a nuclear age. New York: Basic Books, 1987. (a)
Lifton, R.J. Images of nuclear war and human destruction: Psychological perspectives. The McGill Journal of Education, 1987, 22, 203-218. (b)
Lifton, R.J. & Falk, R. Indefensibleweapons: The political and psycholog- ical case against nuclearism. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
Lindell, E. Viildets laroplaner. Stockholm: Sveriges Lararforbund, 1984.
Lindell, E. & SalistrOm, M. VAldets varierande verkningar. Pedagogisk- psykologiska problem, Nr 425, 1983.
26 26 Lindholm, S. The image of the developing countries: An inquiry into Swedish public opinion. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1971. Lindholm, S. A thousand students on war, peace and peace education. (Paper, IPRA, Sussex, England, April 1986.) Stockholm: Department of Education, Stockholm University, 1986. Lindstrom, P. Den hdrda linjen och den mjuka: En studie av slikerhets- politisk attitydbildning. Uppsala: Institutionen for freds- och konflikt- forskning, 1986.
Locatelli, M.G. & Holt, R.R. Antinuck 2r activism, psychic numbing, and mental health. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15 , 143-161.
Lowenstein, L.F. Education for world citizenship. Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 1987, 24(3), 47-49.
Lowenstein, L.F. Realistic versus less realistic peace activism. New Jersey Journal of Professional Counseling, 1990, 53(1), 2-6.
Lyon, M.A. & Russo, T.J. Student concern and potential action regarding nuclear threat. (Paper.) Boston, MA: American Psychological Asso- ciation, 1990. (ED 322 464.) Mack, J.E. The perception of U.S.-Soviet intentions and other psycho- logical dimensions of the nuclear arms race. American Journal of Ortho- psychiatry, 1982, 52, 590-600.
Mack, J.E. Resistances to knowing in the nuclear age. Harvard Educational Review, 1984, 54, 260-270. Mack, J.E. Nuclear weapons and the dark side of humankind. Political Psychology, 1986, 7, 223-233.
Mack, J.E. The challenge of political self-responsibility in the nuclear age. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1988, 28(3), 75-87.
Mack, J.E. & Redmont, J.C. On being a psychoanalyst in the nuclear age. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1989, 29(3), 338-355.
Mack, J.E. & Snow, R. Psychological effects on children and adolescents. In: White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war. New York: NYU Press, 1986. Pp. 16-33.
Macy, J.R. Despair and personal power in the nuclear age. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers, 1983.
27 27
Mapes, M.C. The National Peace Academy: Conflict management and con- flict resolution. American Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1987, 7(3), 135- 140.
Marcattilio, A.J. & Nevin, J.A. The threat of nuclear war: Some responses. Behavior Analyst, 1986, 9(1), 61-70.
Markey, E.J. The politics of arms control: A matter of perception. Ameri- can Psychologist, 1985, 40, 557-560.
Marullo, S. Gender differences in peace movement participation. (Paper.) Baltimore, MD: Eastern Sociological Society, 1989. Mathisen, P. Barns og unges framtidsforestellingerEt pedagogisk an- liggende. Oslo: Pedagogisk Forskningsinstitutt, 1990.
De Mause, L. A proposal for a nuclear tensions monitoring center. Special issue: The psychogenic theory of history: A critique. Journal of Psycho- history, 1985, 13(2), 197-206.
Mayton, D.M. Spontaneous concern about nuclear war by college students. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1986, 7(3), 185-193. (a) Mayton, D.M. The structure of attitudes to doomsday issues: A replica- tion. Australian Psychologist, 1986, 21(3), 395-403. (b)
Mayton, D.M. Values and nuclear freeze attitudes: Some value-attitudere- lationships in adolescents. Contemporary Social Psychology, 1987, 12, 111-114.
Mayton, D.M. Measurement of nuclear war attitudes: Methods andcon- cerns. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 9, 241-263.
Mayton, D.M. & Delamater, M.C. Indirect assessment ofconcern about nuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1986, 59, 709-710. McCarthy, S.V. Elderhostelers and college women coping with nuclear threat: A comparative study of thoughts and actions about nuclearwar. Psychological Reports, 1988, 62(2), 619-625. (a)
McCarthy, S.V. Elderhostelers' coping with nuclear threat: Peacemaking and perception of lifeworld. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1988, 66(1), 264-266. (b)
McClenney, L. & Neiss, R. Psychologicalresponses to the threat of nuclear war. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1989, 19(15, Pt 1), 1239- 1267. 28 28
McGinnis, J. & McGinnis, K. Parenting for peace. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1981.
McGraw, K.M. & Tyler, T.R. The threat of nuclear war and psychological well-being. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 172-188. McKenzie-Mohr, D.P. Perceptions of threat, collective control, tactical efficacy and competing threats as determinants of pro-disarmament behavior. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo, Canada. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1989, 49(12-B, Pt 1), 5571./
Mellville, A. How we view each other: The enemy image and new political thinking. Moscow: Novosti Press, 1988. Melnikova, 0. & Shirkov, Y. Image of the enemy: A description of the image of the enemy among the Soviet people by an associative technique. Educational and Psychological Interactions, No. 102, 1990.
Mende, K.D. & Rathenow, H.-F. (Eds.) Vorurteile and Feindbilder im Ost- West-Verhiiltnis. Berlin: Technische Universitat, 1990.
Mercer, G. Adolescent views of war and peaceAnother look. Journal of Peace Research, 1974, 11, 247-249.
Milgram, S. Obedience to authority. New York: Harper, 1974.
Miller, M.S. Peace through parenting: Some antecedents of militarism in men. (Ph.D.) The Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities, 1987. (Order No. ZA 8725103.)
Mitrofan, I. & Mitrofan, N. Peace and the human condition in the view of Romanian students. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales (Serie de Psy- chologie), 1988, 32(1), 87-93. Modell, J. & Haggerty, T. The social impact of war. Annual Review of Sociology, 1991, 17, 205-224.
Morawski, J.G. & Goldstein, S.E. Psychology and nuclear war: A chapter in our legacy of social responsibility. American Psychologist, 1985, 40, 276-284. Moyer, R.S. Teaching psychology courses about the nuclear arms race. Contemporary Social Psychology, 1987,12(3), 101-110.
Mueller, J. Changing attitudes towards war: The impact of the First World War. British Journal of Political Science, 1991, 21(1), 1-28.
29 29 Murphy, G. (Ed.) Human nature and enduring peace. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1945.
Nelson, A. Psychological equivalence: Awareness and response-ability in our nuclear age. American Psychologist, 1985, 40, 549-556. Nelson, L. & Beardsley, G.L. Toward an interdisciplinary model of barriers to nuclear arms control. Social Science Journal, 1987, 24(4), 375-388.
Nerman, T. Folkhatet. Stockholm: Svenska Andelsforlaget, 1918.
Nevin, J.A. Behavior analysis, the nuclear arms race, and thepeace move- ment. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 27-44. Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear attitudes and reactions: Associations with de- pression, drug use, quality of life. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 1986, 50, 906-920.
Newcomb, M.D. Background, personality, and behavioral correlates of nuclear anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 1988, 9, 379- 389. (a)
Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear anxiety and psychosocial functioningamong young adults. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 9, 107-134. (b)
Newcomb, M.D. Assessment of nuclear anxietyamong American students: Stability over time, secular trends, and emotional correlates. Journal of Social Psychology, 1989, 129, 591-608.
Newman, D. Overcoming the psychological barrier: The role of images in war and peace. In: Kliot, N. & Waterman, S. (Eds.) The political geog- raphy of conflict and peace. London: Belhaven Press, 1991. Pp. 201- 216.
Nielsen, G.S. (Ed.) Psychology and international affairs. Canwe contrib- ute? Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1962.
Nilsson, N. Krig dr ingen lek. Stockholm: Tiden, 1981.
Nilsson, N. Do children need to be introducedto violence? The use of toys of war and violence. (Paper.) Hong Kong: International Conferenceon Early Education and Development, 1989.
Nolting, H.P. Lernschritte zur Gewaltlosigkeit: Ergebnisse psychologischer Friedensforschung. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1981. 30 30
Nord land, E. Nar barn leker krig. Barn, 1984, (3), 24-31,64. Northrup, T.A. Women's and men's conceptions of war, peaceand security. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University. /DissertationAbstracts International, 1988, 49(2-13), 569-570./ Oliner, S.P. Altruism: Antidote to human conflict. HumboldtJournal of Social Relations, 1991, 16(2), 1-37. Oliver, P. Reactions of young New Zealanders to nuclear issues.Com- munity Mental Health in New Zealand, 1989, 4(2), 23-40.
Oliver, P. Nuclear freedom and students' sense of efficacy about prevfmtion of nuclear war. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1990,60(4), 611- 621. O'Malley, E.M. Global awareness of administrators in higher education in the State of Oregon. (Ed.D.) Portland, OR: Portland State University, 1983. Omauer, H., Wiberg, H., Sicinski, A. & Galtung, J. (Eds.) Images of the world in the year 2000: A comparative ten nation study. The Hague: Mouton, 1976. van Omum, W. & Wicker van Omum, M.Talking with children about nu- clear war. New York: Continuum Press, 1984. *Osgood, C.E. An alternative to war and surrender. Urbana, IL: Uni- versity of Illinois Press, 1962. Oskamp, S. (Ed.) International conflict and national public policy issues. Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985. Oskamp, S. et al. The media and nuclear war: Fallout from TV's The Day After. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 127-158. Ostermann, A. Vorurteile haben doch nur die anderen. In: CallieB, J. & Lob, R.E. (Eds.) Handbuch Praxis der Umwelt- und Friedenserziehung. Band 3. Dusseldorf: Schwalm, 1988. Pp. 457-466.
Ostermann, A. & Nicklas, H. Vorurteile und Feindbilder. (3. Aufl.) Wein- heim: Beltz, 1984. Palmer, E.L. The flower and the mushroom: Young children encounter "The Day After". Marriage and Family Review, 1986, 10(2), 51-58.
31 31 Papadatou, D. & Papadatos, C. (Eds.) Children and death. New York: Hemisphere, 1991. Parknas, L. Viigen till forandring: En handbok for Overlevnadsarbete. Goteborg: Pax forlag, 1990. Pasierbsky, F. Krieg und Frieden in der Sprache: Eine sprachwissen- schaftliche Textanalyse. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer, 1983. Pavelchak, M.A. & Schoefield, J.W. Fallout from "The Day After": Content-relevant effects. (Paper.) Toronto: American Psychological Association, 1984. Pear, T.H. (Ed.) Psychological factors of peace and war. New York: Philosophical Library, 1950. Peck, C. Identifying and treating maladaptive responses to the nuclear threat. Behavior Analysis & Social Action, 1989, 7(1-2), 16-22.
Peck, C. Conflict management and the prevention of war. Australian Psy- chologist, 1990, 25(1), 2-14.
Pe lton, L.H. The psychology of nonviolence. New York: Pergamon Press, 1974. Perlman, M. Memory, soul and the place of Hiroshima. Psychohistory Review, 1987, 16(1), 67-97.
Petersen, C.C., Lawrence, J.A. & Dawes, I. The relationship of gender, sex role, and law-and-order attitudes to nuclear opinions. Sex Roles, 1990. 22(5-6), 283-292.
Pettigrew, T.F. The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cog- nitive analysis of prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, 5, 461-476.
Pfltiger P.M. (Ed.) Freund- und Feindbilder: Begegnung mit dem Osten. Olten, Switzerland: Walter-Verlag, 1986. Phillips, N.E. Militarism and grass-roots involvement in the military- industrial complex. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1973, 17, 625-655.
Piaget, J. & Weil, M.A. Development in children of the idea of homeland and of relations with other countries. International Social Science Bulletin, 1951, 3(3), 561-578.
32 32
Pikas, A. Set bekampar vi mobbning i skolan. Uppsala: AMA dataservice, 1987. Pike, L. et al. Other nations, other people: A survey of student interests, knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions. Washington, DC: US Govern- ment Printing Office, 1979.
Pilisuk, M. Experimenting with the arms race. Journal of Conflict Resolu- tion, 1984, 28, 296-315.
Pious, S. Disarmament, arms control, and peace in the nuclear age: Politi- cal objectives and relevant research. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 133-154. Pious, S. & Zimbardo, P.G. The looking glass war. Psychology Today, 1984, 18(11), 48-59. Polyson, J.A., Stein, D.M. & Sholley, B.K. A survey of psychologists' nuclear war attitudes. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 25-39.
Pool, I.D. Symbols of internationalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1951.
Poole, M.E. & Cooney, G.H. Orientations to the future: A comparison of adolescents in Australia and Singapore. Journal of Youth and Ado les- cence, 1987, 16(2), 129-151. Prior, M. Australian adolescents' views of the nuclear threat. Interdis- ciplinary Peace Research, 1989, 1(1), 61-85.
Proceedings of the Congress of European Psychologists for Peace, Helsinki, August 8-10, 1986. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society, 1987.'
Pruitt, D.G. & Rubin, J.Z. Social conflict: Escalation, statement and settle- ment. New York: Random House, 1986.
Psychological aspects of nuclear development. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1982.
Punamaki, R.-L. Childhood under conflict: The attitudes and emotional life of Israeli and Palestinian children. Tampere: Tampere Peace Re- search Institute, 1987.
Rabow, J., Hernandez, A.C.R. & Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear fears and con- cerils among college students: A cross-national study of attitudes. Poli- tical Psychology, 1990, 11(4), 681-698.
33 33 Ramirez, J.M., Hinde, R.A. & Groebel, J. (Eds.) Essays on violence. Sevilla, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, 1987. Raundalen, M. & Finnoy, O.J. Children's and teen-agers' views of the future. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 114-125. (a)
Raundalen, M. & Finn0y, O.J. Scandinavian youth view the future. In: The medical implications of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986. Pp. 435-443..(b) Raundalen, M. & Raundalen, T.S. Barn iatomalderen. Oslo: J.W. Cappelen, 1984. Readiness for peaceReadiness for the future: Reports and Miniprints from the Malmo School of Education. Reprints and Miniprints (Malmo, Sweden: School of Education), No. 743, 1992.
Reardon, B.A. Sexism and the war system. New York: Teachers College Press, 1985.
Reifel, S. Children living with the nuclear threat. Young Children, 1984, 39, 74-80.
Richter, H.E. Alle redeten vom Frieden. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1981.
Richter, H.E. Zur Psychologie des Friedens. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1982.
Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war andpeace: The image of the enemy. New York: Plenum, 1991.
Ris, H.W. The psychological effect of the threat of nuclearwar on children and adolescents: A report of The Third International Congress of Inter- national Physicians to Prevent Nuclear War. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine & Health, 1985,1, 391-395. de Rivera, J.H. The psychological dimension of foreign policy. Columbus, OH: Merrill, 1968. de Rivera, J. Facing nuclear weapons. American Behavioral Scientist, 1984, 27, 739-756. de Rivera, J. & Laird, J. Peace fair or warfare: Educating the community. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 59-80.
Robinson, J.P., Chivian, E. & Tudge, J. News mediause and adolescents' attitudes about nuclear issues: An American-Soviet comparison. Journal of Communication, 1989, 39(2), 105-113.
34 34 Rogers, C.R. A psychologist looks at nuclear war: Its threat, its possible prevention. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1982, 22, 9-20.
Rogers, C.R. Steps toward world peace, 1948-1986: Tension reduction in theory and practice. Counseling and Values, 1987, 32(1), 12-16.
Rogers, C.R. & Malcolm, D. The potential contribution of the behavioral scientist to world peace. Counseling and Values, 1987, 32(1), 10-11. Rogers, C. & Ryback, D. One alternative to nuclear planetary suicide. Counseling Psychologist, 1984,12(2), 3-12. Roscoe, B. Social issues as social problems: Adolescents' perceptions. Adolescence, 1985, 20, 377-383.
Roscoe, B. & Goodwin, M.P. Adolescents' knowledge of nuclear issues and the effects of nuclear war. Adolescence, 1987, 22, 803-812.
Rosell, L. Barns forestallningar om krig och fred. Lund: Sociologiska insti- tutionen, 1968. (a) Rosell, L. Children's views of war and peace. Journal of Peace Research, 1968, 5, 268-276. (b) Rosenblatt, R. Kinder des Krieges: Gespriiche mit Kindern aus Nordirland, Israel, Libanon, Kambodscha and Vietnam. Hamburg: Kabel Verlag, 1984.
Rounds, J.B. Erdahl, P. Nuclear locus of control scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1988, 48, 387-395.
Rowe, D. Living with the bomb: Can we live without enemies? London: Routledge, 1985. Roy, P.J. An examination of psychological variables related to nuclear attitudes and nuclear activism. (Ph.D.) Berkeley, CA: California School of Professional Psychology, 1985.
Rubenfeld, F. The peace manual: A guide to personal-political integration. Berkeley, CA: Lion-Lamb Press, 1986. Rubin, J.Z. Experimental research on third-party interaction in conflict: Toward some generalizations. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 379-1191.
Rudmin, F.W. Seventeen early peace psychologists. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1991, 3 / (2), 12-43.
35 35
Russo, T.J. & Lyon, M.A. Predictors of college students' levels of knowl- edge and concern about nuclear war. Journal of Applied Social Psy- chology, 1990, 20, 739-750.
Sande, G.N. et al. Value-guided attributions: Maintaining the moral self- image and the diabolical enemy-image. Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 91-118.
Sandman, P.M. & Valenti, J.M. Scared stiff or scared into action. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1986, 42(1), 12-16. Scheer, R. With enough shovels: Reagan, Bush, and nuclear war. New York: Random House, 1982.
Schmidhauser, U. Vorurteile, Stereotype, Feindbilder. In: CallieB, J. & Lob, R.E. (Eds.) Praxis der Umwelt- and Friedenserziehung. Band 1. Dusseldorf: Schwann, 1987. Pp. 358-363.
Schwebel, M. (Ed.) Behavioral science and human survival. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books, 1965.
Schwebel, M. Effects of the nuclear war threat on children and teenagers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1982, 52, 608-618.
Schwebel, M. (Ed.) Mental health implications of life in the nuclearage. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1986. /Special issue of: International Journal of Mental Health, /5(1-3)./
Schwebel, M. The construction of reality in the nuclear age. Political Psy- chology, 1990, 11(3), 521-552.
Segal, H. Silence is the real crime. International Review of Psycho-Analy- sis, 1987,14(1), 3-12.
Seligman, M.E.P. Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.
Senghaas-Knobloch, E. Von Feindbildern zur kooperativen Bearbeitung von gemeinsamen Zivilisationsaufgaben in Europa. Bern: Arbeitspapiere der Schweizerischen Friedensstiftung, 1990.
Senghaas-Knobloch, E. Social learning and conflict resolution ina changing Europe. In: Boulding, E. (Ed.) New agendas forpeace research. London: Rienner, 1992. Pp. 13-21.
Sheffet, A.M. et al. Adolescents and nuclear arms issues. Social Science and Medicine, 1988, 27, 995-998. 36 36
Sheridan, D.B. Ecofeminist strategies of peacemaking. (Ph.D.) Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, 1990. (Order No. 9025497.) Sherif, M. Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. In: Gilbert, G.M. (Ed.) Psychological approaches to intergroup and international understanding. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1956. Pp. 6-12. Sherif, M. et al. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange, 1961. Sherif, M. & Sherif, C. In common predicament: Social psychology of inter-group conflict and cooperation, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1966. Shohat, L. Israeli children's conceptualization of war and peace: An ex- ploratory cognitive-developmental study. New York: Columbia University. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1988, 48(8-B), 2478./
Showers, D.E. The effect of persuasion on nuclear attitudes of secondary school students. (Paper.) Washington, DC: National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 1987. Silverman, J.M. & Kumka, D.S. Gender differences in attitudes toward nuclear war and disarmament. Sex Roles, 1987, 16, 189-203.
Silverstein, B. Toward a science of propaganda. Political Psychology, 1987, 8, 49-60. Silverstein, B. Enemy images: The psychology of U.S. attitudes and cog- nitions regarding the Soviet Union. American Psychologist, 1989, 44, 903-913.
Silverstein, B. & Flamenbaum, C. Biases in the perception and cognition of the action of enemies. Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 51-72.
Silverstein, B. & Holt, R.R. Research on enemy images: Present status and future prospects. Journal of Social issues, 1989, 45(2), 159-175.
Simmons, J.R. Sources of political socialization to international conflict: Influences of the mass media, family, peer group, school and religion on adolescents' orientations toward war and peace. (Ph.D.) Seattle, WA: University of Washington, 1974.
Skinner, B.F. Toward the cause of peace: What can psychology contribute? In: Oskamp, S. (Ed.) International conflict and national public policy issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985. Pp. 21-26.
37 37
Slee, P.T. & Cross, D.G. Living in the nuclear age: An Australian study of children's and adolescents' fears. Child Psychiatry and Human Develop- ment, 1989, 19(4), 270-278. Smith, C.G. (Ed.) Conflict resolution: Contributions of the behavioral sciences. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1971.
Smith, M.B. War, peace and psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 1986, 42(4), 23-38.
Snyder, R.C., Bruck, H.W. & Sapin, B. Decision-makingas an approach to the study of international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954.
Solantaus, T. The global world: A domain for development in adolescence? Journal of Adolescence, 1989,12(1), 27-40.
Solantaus, T. Young people and the threat of nuclearwar: 'Out there is a world I belong to'. A literature review. (Medicine and War, Vol. 7, Suppl. 1.) London: Cass, 1991.
Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of the threat of nuclearwar on children and adolescents. Boston, MA: International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, 1985.
Solantaus, T. & Rimpela, M. Mental health and the threat of nuclearwar. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 261-275.
Solantaus, T., Rimpela, M. & Rahkonen, 0. Social epidemiologyof the experience of 1-reat of war among Finnish youth. SocialScience and Medicine, 1985, 21, 145-151.
Solantaus, T., Rimpela, M. & Taipale, V. The threat ofwar in the minds of 12- to 18-year-olds in Finland. Lancet, April 7, 1984(No. 8380), 784-785.
Solomon, L.N. Carl Rogers' efforts for worldpeace. Person-Centered Review, 1990, 5(1), 39-56.
Solomon, Z. Does the war end when the shooting stops? Thepsychological toll of war. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1990, 20(21),1733- 1745.
Sommer, G. et al. (Eds.) Feindbilder im Dienste der Aufrastung:Beitrage aus Psychologie und anderen Humanwissenschaften. (2. Aufl.) Marburg: Interdisziplinare Arbeitsgruppe Friedens- und Abriistungsforschung, 1988.
38 38
Sommers, F.G. et al. The nuclear threat and Canadian children. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 1984, 76, 154-156. Sommers, F.G. & Dineen, T. Curing nuclear madness: A new-age pre- scription for personal action. Toronto: Methuen, 1984.
Spielman, M. If peace comes...The future expectations of Jewish and Arab Israeli children and youth. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1984.
Stagner, R. Psychological aspects of international conflict. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth, 1967. Stanford, B. (Ed.) Peacemaking: A guide to conflict resolution for indi- viduals, groups, and nations. New York: Bantam Books, 1976.
Staub, E. The evolution of caring and nonaggressive persons and societies. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 81-100.
Staub, E. The psychological and cultural roots of group violence: The Gulf War. Journal of Psychohistory, 1991,19(1), 115-121.
Steiner, P.P. In collusion with the nation: A case study of group dynamics at a strategic nuclear policy-making meeting. Political Psychology, 1989. 10(4), 647-673.
Steinweg, R. Perception of body attitudes as a factor of violence-breeding communication: A proposal on grassroots peace education. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 1984, 15(1), 93-100.
Steinweg, R. & Wellmann, C. (Eds.) Die vergessene Dimension interna- tionaler Konflikte: Subjektiviteit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990.
Stevenson, B.W., Roscoe, B. & Kennedy, D. Perceptions of conventional war: Late adolescents' views. Adolescence, 1988, 23(91), 613-627.
Stewart, G.A. The relationship between adolescents' concern over the threat of nuclear war and several personality dimensions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1988, 20, 452-460.
Stillion, J.M. Examining the shadow: Gifted children respond to the nuclear threat. Death Studies, 1986, 10, 27-41. Stillion, J.M. et al. Dimensions of the shadow: Children of six nations respond to the nuclear threat. Death Studies, 1988, 12, 227-251.
39 39
Stoddard, F. & Mack, J.E. Children, adolescents and the threat of nuclear war. In: Noshpitz, J.D. (Ed.) Basic handbook of child psychiatry. Vol. 5. New York: Basic Books, 1987. Pp. 616-627.
Stutz, G. Asikt 90: En undersokning bland ungdom i december 1990. (Med- delande 130.) Stockholm: Styrelsen for psykologiskt forsvar, 1991.
Summers, C. State-sponsored destruction in 1945 and 1990: Effects ofcon- flicting personal responsibilities. Current Research on Peace and Vio- lence, 1990, 13, 91-96.
Sutton-Smith, B. War toys and childhood aggression. Play & Culture, 1988, 1(1), 57-69. Swingle, P.G. The resolution of conflict. Canadian Psychology, 1989, 10(3), 650-661.
Szalay, L.B. & Mir-Djalali, E. Image of the enemy: Critical parameters, cultural variations. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology ofwar and peace. New York: Plenum, 1991. Pp. 213-250.
Taha, M,M.M. The construction and the implementation ofan instrument to measure the attitudes of college students towards conflict resolution an;ong nations. (Ph.D.) University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Uni- versity, 1982.
Tajfel, H. Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25(4), 79-97.
Taylor, A.J. & Patten, M.D. The attitudes andresponses of Wellington adolescents to nuclear war and other nuclear issues. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 1988, 17, 36-40.
Templin, R.D. Psychology of war and peace. Journal of Human Relations, 1968, 16(2), 239-249.
Tephly, J. Young children's understanding ofwar and peace. Early Child Development and Care, 1985, 20(4), 271-285.
Tetlock, P.E. et al. (Eds.) Behavior, society, and nuclearwar. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Tetlock, P.E., McGuire, C.B. & Mitchell, G. Psychological perspectiveson nuclear deterrence. Annual Review of Psychology, 1991, 42, 239-276.
40 40
Thearle, L. & Weinreich-Haste, H. Ways of dealing with the nuclearthreat: Coping and defence among British adolescents. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 126-142. Thompson, J. Psychological aspects of nuclear war. Chichester, U.K.: British Psychological Society & Wiley, 1985.
Thompson, J. Social traps and intelligent escapes. In: Swedish Professionals Against Nuclear Arms. Disarmamentbut how? Lulea, Sweden: Swedish Physicians Against Nuclear Arms, 1988. Pp. 71-80. Thompson, J.A. Perceptions of the Soviet Union and the arms race: A ten nation cross-cultural study. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war and peace. New York:Plenum, 1991. Pp. 155-167. Tizard, B. Problematic aspects of nuclear education. Harvard Educational Review, 1984, 54, 271-281.
Tizard, B. Old and new paradigms: Research on young people's response to the nuclear threat. Journal of Adolescence, 1989,12(1), 1-10. Tolley, H. Children and war: Political socialization to international con- flict. New York: Teachers College Press, 1973. Trygestad, J. & Bents, R. Cross-cultural perspectives on peace. (Paper.) New Orleans, LA: American Educational Research Association, 1988. Tudge, J. et al. American and Soviet adolescents' attitudes toward the future: The relationship between worry about nuclear war and optimism. International Journal of Mental Health, 1990-91, 19(4), 58-84. Tvingstedt, A.-L. Samtal med elever i arskurs 2 om krig och fred. Peda- gogisk-psykologiska problem (Malmo: School of Education), No. 514, 1989.
United Nations. Social psychological techniques and the peaceful settlement of international disputes. New York: UN1TAR, 1970.
Utas Carlsson, K. Samtal om fred och krig med elever i arskurs 5. Peda- gogisk-psykologiska problem (Malmo: School of Education), No. 534, 1990. Vogt, W.R. Militarlogik gegen Zivillogik: Sind Kriege abschaffbar? In: Jahrbuch Frieden 1992. Miinchen: Beck, 1991. Pp. 39-52.
4 41 Volkan, V.D. Psychological concepts useful in the building of political foundations between nations: Track II diplomacy. Journal of the Amer- ican Psychoanalytic Association, 1987, 35(4), 903-935.
Wagner, R.V., de Rivera, J. & Watkins, M. (Eds.) Psychology and the pro- motion of peace. (Special issue of:) Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2).
Wahlstrom, R. Psykologiska utgangspunkter for fredsfostran. Nordisk Psy- kologi, 1984, 36, 160-168. Wahlstrom, R. De ungas uppfattningar om krig och fred. Nordisk Psy- kologi, 1985, 37, 298-309. (a)
Wahlstrom, R. Fear of war, conceptions of war, and peace activities: Their relation to self-esteem in young people. In: Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of the threat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston, MA: IPPNW, 1985. Pp. 104-111. (b)
Wahlstrom, R. An enemy image as a psychological antecedent of warfare and armament. In: Proceedings of the Congress of European Psy- chologists for Peace. Helsinki: Finnish Psychological Society, 1987. Pp. 144-149.
Wahlstrom, R. Growth towards peace and environmental responsibility. Jyvaskyla, Finland: Institute for Educational Research, 1991. Wahlstrom, R. Promoting commitment to peace and environmental re- sponsibility. Peace. Environment and Education, 1992, 3(1), 33-43. Waldron, I. et al. Activism against nuclear weapons build-up. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 18, 826-836.
Wallinga, C. et al. Children and nuclear war: Reviews of research. Child- hood Education, 1991, 67(4), 260-263.
Walsh, R. Staying alive: The psychology of human survival. Boston, MA: New Science Library, 1984.
Walsh, R. Psychology of peace. In: Laszlo, E. & Yoo, J Y. (Eds.) World encyclopedia of peace. Vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1986. Pp. 304-307. Walsh, R. Toward a psychology of human survival: Psychological approaches to contemporary global threats. American Journal of Psy- chotherapy, 1989, 43(2), 158-180.
42 42
Watanabe, P.Y. & Milburn, M.A. Activism against Armageddon: Some predictors of nuclear-related political behavior. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 459-470. Watkins, D. & Sampson, J. The attitudes of New South Wales secondary pupils towards various social issues. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 1975, 11(3), 69-71.
Watkins, M.M. Moral imagination and peace activism: Discerning the inner voices. Psychological Perspectives, 1985,16(1), 77-93.
Watkins, M.M. Imagination and peace: On the inner dynamics of promo- ting peace activism. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 39-57. Wegener-Sparing, G. War toys and aggressive games. Play & Culture, 1989, 2(1), 35-47.
Weiss, D.K. Effects of a nuclear education program on nuclear anxiety and hopelessness in adolescents. San Diego, CA: California School of Professional Psychology. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1990, 50(11-B), 5338./ Wellington, J. Including the nuclear issue in the school curriculum: A balanced approach. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1985, 15(3), 127- 133.
Werner, P.D. & Roy, P.J. Measuring activism regarding the nuclear arms race. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49, 181-186.
Westin, C. Majoritet om minoritet: En studie i etnisk tolerans i 80-talets Sverige. Stockholm: Liber, 1984.
Westin, C. Tortyr och existens. Goteborg: Korpen, 1989.
Wetzel, N.A. & Winawer, H. The psychosocial consequences of the nuclear threat from a family systems perspective. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 298-313. White, R.K. Nobody wanted war: Misperception in Vietnam and other wars. (Rev. ed.) Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970. *White, R.K. Fearful warriors: A psychological profile of U.S.-Soviet relations. New York: Free Press, 1984.
White, R.K. Ten psychological contributions to the prevention of nuclear war. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 45-61.
43 43
White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the prevention of nuclearwar. New York: New York University Press, 1986.
White, R.K. Underestimating and overestimating others' fear. Journal of Social Issues, 1987, 43(4), 105-109. White, R.K. Specifics in a positive approach to peace. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 191-202. (a)
White, R.K. The stream of thought, the lifespace, selective inattention, and war. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1988, 28(2), 73-86. (b)
White, R.K. Why aggressors lose. Political Psychology, 1990, 11, 227-242.
Whiteley, J.M. Quest for peace: A film /videotape interview series. Irvine, CA: University of California, 1984.
Wiberg, H. Visions of the future: A cross-nationalsurvey. Lund: Lund Studies in Sociology, 1977.
Wollman, N. (Ed.) Working for peace: A handbook of practical psychology and other tools. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact Publishers, 1985. Wrightsman, L.S. Parental attitudes and behaviors as determinants of children's responses to the threat of nuclear war. Vita Humana, 1964, 7, 178-185.
Zawodny, J.K. (Ed.) Man and international relations. 1-2. San Fransisco, CA: Chandler, 1966.
Ziv, A., Kruglanski, A.W. & Shulman, S. Children's psychologicalreac- tions to wartime stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30(1), 24-30.
Zlate, M. Psychological guide marks for a possible pedagogy ofpeace. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales, Serie de Psychologie, 1988, 32(1), 77-81.
Zur, 0. Neither doves nor hawks: Marking the territory covered by the field of psychology of peace and war: 1. Contemporary Social Psycho- logy, 1987, 12(3), 89-100.
Zur, 0. On nuclear attitudes and psychic numbing: Overview and critique. Contemporary Social Psychology, 1990, 14(2), 96-110.
Zur, 0. & Morrison, A. Gender and war: Reexamining attitudes. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1989, 59, 528-533.
44 44 Zweigenhaft, R.L. Providing information and shaping attitudes about nuclear dangers: Implications for public education. Political Psychology, 1985, 6, 461-480. (a)
Zweigenhaft, R.L. Race, sex, and nuclear war. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 1985, 111, 283-301. (b)
Zweigenhaft, R.L. et al. Nuclear knowledge and nuclear anxiety: A cross- cultural investigation. Journal of Social Psychology, 1986, 126, 473-484.
Zweigenhaft, R.L. et al. Images of nuclear activists in four countries. Jour- nal of Psychology, 1989,123(4), 339-356. Alvik, T. The development of views on conflict, war and peace among school children. Journal of Peace Research, 1968, 5, 171-195. (a) Alvik, T. The problem of anxiety in connection with investigations con- cerning children's conception of war and peace. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1968, 12, 215-233. (b)
45 r- o:3a, 0.0s 0 0 w C O imp0 CDfD A:0)-% Ma "D) W0 - =-.66 O- o `< 0 30 (DCD(j) Abstract card Reference card Bjerstedt, A. perspective:tation (Malmo, A selective Sweden: Schoolbibliography. of Education), (Ed.) Peace/war issues from a psychological Pedagogisk dokumen- No. 113, 1992. Bjerstect, A. perspective:tation (Malmo, A selective Sweden: Schoolbibliography. of Education), Pedagogisk No. 113, 1992. (Ed.) Peace/war issues from a psychological dokumen- orpeaceIn discussion this etc. report and related examplesof peace to psychologicalof publications containing education are listed. The major aspects of war, studies with war,Keywords:somefocus peace, examples is Anxiety,on peace materials added education, bibliography, from in English enemy from recent years, 46 other language areas. prejudice, sex roles, war. images, nuclear 47