Osama%27S%20PHD%20Thesis.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Saudi interpretations of capacity, public policy and awards being set aside in the country of origin in the refusal of arbitral awards under Article V of the New York Convention 1958, With Reference to French and English Legal Systems First supervisor: Dr. Hong-Lin By: Osama Abdullatif Rabah LLB, LLM A Thesis Submitted to the School of Law, University of Stirling for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Stirling, Scotland UK April 2018 CONTENTS ABSTRACT: .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 THE SCOPE AND IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY: .............................................................................. 10 1.3 WHY THESE THREE GROUNDS ARE PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT ................................................ 13 1.3.1 The effect of Islamic rules on these three grounds: ....................................................... 15 1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.5 LIMITATION OF RESEARCH: ............................................................................................................... 19 1.6 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................... 20 1.6.1 historical view of methodology of Comparative Law .................................................. 20 1.6.2 the rationale Behind choosing the methodology of Comparative Law in this thesis 21 1.6.3 type of comparative research methodology in this thesis .......................................... 23 1.6.4 reasons Behind choosing English and french legal systems ...................................... 24 1.7 THE CHAPTERS’ AIMS: ......................................................................................................................... 25 2 CHAPTER TWO ....................................................................................................................... 29 2.1 ROAD MAP TO ARTICLE V: RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT ................................................. 29 2.2 SCOPE OF ART V INTERPRETATION ................................................................................................. 32 2.3 THE HISTORICAL APPROACH TOWARD ARBITRATION IN SAUDI ARABIA .................................. 35 2.3.1 The importance of studying the history of arBitration in saudi AraBia .............. 36 2.3.2 history of arBitration in araBian Peninsula Before the country estaBlishment 37 2.3.3 History of Saudi AraBian arbitration in the modern era: .......................................... 39 2.4 THE IMPACT OF ISLAMIC RULES ON THE THESE THREE GROUNDS OF REFUSAL IN HISTORY OF SAUDI LEGAL SYSTEM ...................................................................................................................................... 40 2.4.1 impact of Islamic rules over the parties’ capacity in arBitration contracts ...... 41 2.4.2 The IMPACT OF ISLAMIC RULES OVER PUBLIC POLICY AND SET ASIDE AWARDS .......................................................................................................................................................... 50 2.5 THE IMPACT OF SIGNING THE NEW YORK CONVENTION ON SAUDI ARBITRATION LAW ......... 55 2.6 IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENT IN SAUDI 2012 ACT ......................................................................... 61 2.6.1 Pre-arbitral procedures in Saudi Arbitration Law ....................................................... 66 2.6.2 Personal point of view ............................................................................................................... 68 2.6.3 Supporting role of the Saudi Court under the 2012 Act: ............................................ 70 2 2.7 THE ROLE OF ENFORCING COURT : ................................................................................................... 78 2.8 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................... 79 3 CHAPTER THREE: .................................................................................................................. 84 THE REQUIREMENTS OF PARTIES CAPACITY IN ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS ...... 84 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 85 3.2 THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS CHAPTER ............................................................................................... 86 3.3 THE SUBJECTS OF THE LEGAL CAPACITY .......................................................................................... 91 3.3.1 Natural (physical) person ........................................................................................................ 91 3.3.2 Natural (physical) person capacity to arBitrate in French legal system ............ 92 3.3.3 Natural (physical) person capacity to arBitrate in saudi AraBia ........................... 96 3.4 JURISTIC (LEGAL) PERSON ............................................................................................................... 100 3.4.1 types of (legal) person ............................................................................................................ 102 3.4.2 ArBitration in administrative contracts ......................................................................... 104 3.4.3 capacity of insolvent legal person to arbitrate ............................................................ 116 3.4.4 Insolvency in the English and French Legal systems ................................................. 116 3.4.5 Insolvency in the Saudi Legal system ............................................................................... 121 3.5 CONCLUSION: ...................................................................................................................................... 124 4 CHAPTER FOUR .................................................................................................................... 126 4.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 127 4.2 THE IMPORTANCE OF ARTICLE V(1)(E) FOR DELOCALIZATION ............................................... 128 4.2.1 The award “has not yet Become Binding” ...................................................................... 128 4.2.2 The award ‘has Been set aside’: .......................................................................................... 129 4.3 THE RELATION BETWEEN V(1)(E) AND ARTICLE VII : ............................................................. 130 4.4 THE DELOCALIZATION THEORY ..................................................................................................... 131 4.5 ARTICLE V(1)(E), “UNDER THE LAW OF WHICH” THE MISLEADING PHRASE ........................ 137 4.6 APPROACHES TOWARD DELOCALIZED ARBITRATION ................................................................. 142 4.6.1 How proBlematic is the Saudi approach toward delocalization of international arbitration ................................................................................................................................................... 143 4.7 THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE “MA BONYA ALA BATIL FAHWA BATIL” PRINCIPLE .................. 152 4.7.1 Is Saudi AraBia applying the “ma Bonya ala Batil fahwa Batil” principle ....... 154 4.7.2 French approach toward delocalized arBitration ..................................................... 158 4.7.3 English approach toward delocalized arBitration ..................................................... 160 4.8 CONCLUSION: ...................................................................................................................................... 163 5 CHAPTER FIVE ...................................................................................................................... 165 3 PUBLIC POLICY GROUND OF REFUSAL UNDER NEW YORK CONVENTION 1958 ... 165 5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 166 5.2 THE DEFINITIONS OF PUBLIC POLICY: .......................................................................................... 167 5.2.1 Definition Of PuBlic Policy In The French Legal System .......................................... 169 5.2.2 Divination of puBlic policy in the English legal system ............................................ 171 5.2.3 Divination of puBlic policy in Saudi legal system ....................................................... 173 5.3 THE PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF PUBLIC POLICY AS GROUND OF REFUSAL IN SAUDI ARABIA 173 5.3.1 judicial puBlication .................................................................................................................. 174 5.3.2 lack of clarity of sharia as a puBlic policy source ....................................................... 175 5.3.3 Sharia rules before arbitration act 2012 ...................................................................... 176 5.3.4 How (Ijtihad)