Twenty Foilborne Years, the U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Twenty Foilborne Years, the U.S TWENTY FOILBORNE YEARS THE U.S. NAVY HYDROFOIL High Point PCH- 1 Wm. M. Ellsworth Prepared for DTNSRDC under Contract #N00600-81-D-0252- FD 36 and FD 40 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. This document prepared for the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center under Contract No. NO06004 I -D-O252-FD36iFD40. TWENTY FOILBORNE YEARS THE U.S. NAVY HYDROFOIL High Point PCH- 1 Wm. M. Ellsworth Prepared for DTNSRDC under Contract #NOO600-8 l-D-0252- FD 36 and FD 40 Table of Contents PAGE . TABLE OF CONTENTS.. ._. .._.. ,__.,,... .,... , . ..I...._. ..I 111 LIST OF FIGURES . .._........._................. .._ . vii . LIST OF TABLES.. .._. .._.................. ,.... .._. _..... .xl11 . ABSTRACT.. ,_. ._. xv PREFACE .._........ .._............ .xvii . CHAPTER I - HYDROFOIL EVOLUTION.. ,. ._. 1 EARLY TEST CRAFT ......................................................................... ............................ 1 EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT.. ............................................................. ........................... 2 EARLY U.S. NAVY DEVELOPMENTS.. ................................................. ........................... 7 THE LANDING CRAFT DIVERSION .................................................... ........................... 10 THE CANADIAN CONNECTION ......................................................... ........................... 15 DEVELOPMENT OF SEA LEGS ............................................................ ........................... 19 THE MARITIME CONNECTION ........................................................... ........................... 22 CHAPTER 2 - PCH DESIGN. .._...... .._....................... .27 . PRELIMINARY DESIGN.. ................................................................................................ 27 CONTRACT DESIGN.. .................................................................................................... 30 . 111 CHAPTER 3 - ACQUISITION.. , . 47 THE BID PACKAGE.. ........................................ ......... .............. 47 CONTRACT AWARD.. ....................................... ......... .............. 48 DETAIL DESIGN AND SUBSYSTEMS .................. ,,., ......... .............. 48 SHIP CONSTRUCTION ...................................... ......... .............. 61 SUPERVISOR OF SHIPBUILDING.. ..................... ......... .............. 63 LAUNCHING ..................................................... ......... .............. 64 CHAPTER 4 - EARLY TRIALS . 67 BUILDERS TRIALS.. ................................................. ....................................... 67 PRE-DELIVERY SHIP’S FORCE.. ............................... ....................................... 71 SPECIAL PERFORMANCE TRIALS PLANNING.. ......... ,... ,... ....................................... 74 CHAPTER 5 - POST DELIVERY TRIBULATIONS... _... .._. 81 FINAL ACCEPTANCE TRIALS .......... ............................. 83 BACK IN WASHINGTON.. .............. ............................. 84 FRESH-I AND AGEH-1.. .................. ..,. .,.. ............................. 85 SPECIAL PERFORMANCE TRIALS .... ,... ............................. 88 ROUGH WATER TRIALS ................ ........ 95 GROWING CONCERN .................... .,............ ........ 98 CHAPTER 6 - REGROUPING.. ,. 101 MOD-O REPAIR.. ....................................... ..,. 1. ......... ........ 101 RESTRUCTURING THE PROGRAM ............. .............. .,.. ......... ........ 102 LOCATION OF THE TRIALS UNIT.. ........... .............. ......... ........ 105 MOD-I STUDY .......................................... .............. ......... ........ 110 BOEING VERIF1CATION TRIALS ................ .............. .,.. ........ 111 THE TRIALS UNIT IS ESTABLISHED .......... .............. ........ 115 CHAPTER 7 - PROGRAM IN TRANSITION. ._. _. ,.... ,. 1 19 OVERVIEW 1967.. ......................................................................................................... 119 OVERVIEW 1968.. ......................................................................................................... 122 OVERVIEW 1(;,69 ........................................................................................................... 123 OVERVIEW 1970.. ......................................................................................................... 127 TRIALS PLANNING ........................................................................................................ 128 RADIATED NOISE., ........................................................................................................ 129 EXTENDABLE: SONAR.. ................................................................................................ 130 TORPEDO FIRING ......................................................................................................... 131 40 MM GUN FIRING ...................................................................................................... 132 SINGLE-ENGINE OPERATION ......................................................................................... 136 TOWED BODY TRIALS.. ............................................................................................... 138 iv CHAPTER 8 - 1971 SOCAL DEPLOYMENT . .._...._..............._....................................... 143 MAKING PREPARATIONS .................... .............. 143 TRANSIT TO SAN DIEGO.. ................. .............. .............................. 143 EXERCISE COMPTIJEX-7 1.. ................. ......... .............................. 146 OPERATIONS IN SAN DIEGO .............. ......... , . .............................. 147 EXERCISE ADMIXTURE ....................... ......... .............................. 149 THE VOYAGE HOME.......................... ......... 153 PROGRAM OFFICE CHANGES ............. * . 154 CHAPTER 9 - MOD-I . .._......... _....._........ 157 DESIGN ......................................................................................................................... 157 PRE-MOD-I OPS.. ........................................................................................................... 158 MOD-I AT LAST.. ........................................................................................................... 162 MERITORIOUS UNIT CITATION. .................................................................................... 162 MOD-I CHANGES ........................................................................................................... 164 EXFOLIATION ............................................................................................................... 172 STRAIN GAUGES.. ......................................................................................................... 173 ANTI-CLIMAX ................................................................................................................ 173 CHAPTER 10 - MISSION TRIALS 73-75 . 175 PENAIDS TRIALS................... ......... .,.. 175 HARPOON FIRING ................. ......... 177 SCFCS TRIALS....................... ......... 179 SOCAL- DEPLOYMENT ....... ......... 183 THE COHO-II RESCUE.. ......... ......... 185 BACK TO PSNS ...................... ......... ..,. 187 COAST GUARD OPERATION . ......... 188 ASSIST ................................... 192 AGAIN AT PSNS.. ................... 193 CHAPTER 11 - THE SECOND DECADE . ..,.. ..I......... 197 OVERVIEW 1976........................................................................................................... 197 OVERVIEW 1977.. ......................................................................................................... 200 THE DEACTIVATION AFFAIR.. ....................................................................................... 202 OVERVIEW 1978.. ......................................................................................................... 204 OVERVIEW 1979.. ......................................................................................................... 205 OVERVIEW 1980 ........................................................................................................... 207 DEACTIVATION REVISITED.. ......................................................................................... 209 DTAS ............................................................................................................................ 2 11 OVERVIEW 1981.. ......................................................................................................... 214 OVERVIEW 1982.. ......................................................................................................... 2 16 OVERVIEW 1983. .......................................................................................................... 219 HYTOW’.... .................................................................................................................... 220 OVERVIEW 19&I.. ......................................................................................................... 226 EPILOG . .._...................._........._................................................................... 231 CHANGING OF THE GUARD .......................................................................................... 23 1 LESSONS LEARNED.. ...................................................................................................... 232 REFERENCES . _ . _ . _ . 2 3 5 APPENDICES A- CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS ................................................................ 243 B- HIGH POINT OPERATIONS
Recommended publications
  • 'A Little Light on What's Going On!'
    Volume VII, No. 69 ~ Winter 2014-2015 Starshell ‘A little light on what’s going on!’ CANADA IS A MARITIME NATION A maritime nation must take steps to protect and further its interests, both in home waters and with friends in distant waters. Canada therefore needs a robust and multipurpose Royal Canadian Navy. National Magazine of The Naval Association of Canada Magazine nationale de L’Association Navale du Canada www.navalassoc.ca On our cover… To date, the Royal Canadian Navy’s only purpose-built, ice-capable Arctic Patrol Vessel, HMCS Labrador, commissioned into the Royal Canadian Navy July 8th, 1954, ‘poses’ in her frozen natural element, date unknown. She was a state-of-the- Starshell art diesel electric icebreaker similar in design to the US Coast Guard’s Wind-class ISSN-1191-1166 icebreakers, however, was modified to include a suite of scientific instruments so it could serve as an exploration vessel rather than a warship like the American Coast National magazine of The Naval Association of Canada Guard vessels. She was the first ship to circumnavigate North America when, in Magazine nationale de L’Association Navale du Canada 1954, she transited the Northwest Passage and returned to Halifax through the Panama Canal. When DND decided to reduce spending by cancelling the Arctic patrols, Labrador was transferred to the Department of Transport becoming the www.navalassoc.ca CGSS Labrador until being paid off and sold for scrap in 1987. Royal Canadian Navy photo/University of Calgary PATRON • HRH The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh HONORARY PRESIDENT • H. R. (Harry) Steele In this edition… PRESIDENT • Jim Carruthers, [email protected] NAC Conference – Canada’s Third Ocean 3 PAST PRESIDENT • Ken Summers, [email protected] The Editor’s Desk 4 TREASURER • King Wan, [email protected] The Bridge 4 The Front Desk 6 NAVAL AFFAIRS • Daniel Sing, [email protected] NAC Regalia Sales 6 HISTORY & HERITAGE • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Systems Programs
    The second ship of their class, USS Frank Cable (AS-40) is forward-deployed at Apra Harbor, Guam, where she serves U.S. Submarines - and - surfaces combatants - on deployments to the western Pacific. She was built by Lockheed/Seattle and commissioned in 1980. Frank Cable is one of two forward-deployed tenders that provide vital services to submarines while away from their homeports. She is seen here with USS Salt Lake City (SSN-716). THE SUBMARINE'S SECRET WEAPON A Tender Tale by Randall Guttery Even though Japan succeeded in destroying or damaging much of the battle line of the U.S. Fleet at Pearl Harbor, it is a great irony of World War II that their own senior officers immediately acknowledged two major failures: First, that the U.S. aircraft carriers escaped destruction; and second, that the air attack had largely ignored the Pearl Harbor submarine base. Subsequently, with the main body of the Pacific Fleet incapacitated, U.S. submarines were virtually the only forces left to carry the fight to the enemy. As Admiral Chester W. Nimitz observed, "When I assumed command of the Pacific Fleet on 31 December 1941, our submarines were already operating against the enemy, the only units of the fleet that could come to grips with the Japanese for months to come. It was to the Submarine Force that I looked to carry the load until our great industrial activity could produce the weapons we so sorely needed to carry the war to the enemy. It is to the everlasting honor and glory of our submarine personnel that they never failed us in our days of great peril." The image that most people have of the submarine operations that ensued is one of hunting down the enemy on far-flung war patrols and then returning home victoriously with a broom tied to the mast - as often as not passing under the Golden Gate Bridge - to a comfortable port where liberty, rest, and recreation awaited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parasitic Wasps of the Genus Macroteleia Westwood of the New World (Hylnenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Scelionidae)
    :; 1111'2.8 2 5 :it "'" 2_8 1/11/2.5 11111 . 1.0 32 1.0 kJW 001 I . 2 I~ ~",u 2.2 ~ !;,; I~ I~ I~ I:.: I:.: ...,i'-' I~ ...t:.; m~ '- ~ '- " 1.1 ........... 1.1 I,;,a~,- -- -- 111111.8 111111.25 111111.4 11111 1.6 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-J963-A NATIONAL BUREAU ill STANDARDS l%l·A The Parasitic Wasps of the Genus Macroteleia Westwood of the New World (HYlnenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Scelionidae) By CarlF. W. Muese~)eck Technical Bulletin No. 1565 Agrieullural ReHeard. Service UNIT.ED STATES DEPAU'I'i\IEYI' OF AGI{[CLTllIU~ WlIshingloll, D.C. Issued August 1977 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to many institutions and individuals for providing specimens for this study. Type-specimens we1"e contained in loans from the BritishMuseum (Xa1uml History), arranged by Z. Boucek; )1useum of Comparative Zoology, Harnlrd Lniwrsity, by Janice C. Scott i California Academy of Sciences, by Paul H. Arnaud, Jr. j rnivcrsity of Laval, Quebec, by J. ~I. Perron i Cornell "Cniversity, by L. L. Pechuman; Swedish ~:[useum of Natural History, by Karl-Johan Hedqvistj and ~1useo Ci"ico eli Storia Naturale, Genoa, Italy, by F. Bin. Other material. nearly all of it Hnidentifir.d. was received on loan from most of these sources and from Henry Townes, .Ann Arbor, :Mich.; lllinois X atural History Surny. arranp:C'd by L. .r. Stannard: rninrsity of California at Davis, bJ ' it O. Schuster: Lniwrsity of Kansas, by George 'Y. Byers; Texas A.
    [Show full text]
  • D N T E Kjsch PLASTIC L E AG U E RA
    d N T E KjSCH PLASTIC L E AG U E RA Vol. XXIX AUSTIN, TEXAS, APRIL, 1946 No. 8 Heads One-Ad GENERAL PROGRAM To Select Best '45 State Meet Declaimers of the Regional Meets Play Contest Thirty-sixth Annual State Meet One-Act Plays Change Dates University Interscholastic League Vy/E CERTAINLY enjoyed tak- Experienced in League Drama Texas Tech Speech Professor Big Interest in District Meets •V ing part in the State Bas­ Activities, Melvin Pape Will Act as Critic-Judge Shown Throughout State; ketball Tournament and the boys CAUTION: A revision of this program will be issued in cir­ Accepts Directorship cular form, and a copy mailed to each school which is reported At State Meet Contest Back to Pre-War Level are still talking about how swell as qualifying contestants for the State Meet. This Official everybody treated all of us. A/TELVIN E. PAPE, acting Program will be issued for distribution to contestants and dele­ /->RITIC JUDGE for the •D EGIONAL meets for Re- The radio broadcast was perfect gates before the Meet opens and will be available at head­ **- chairman of the depart­ quarters. Always go by the LATEST EDITION of the program. ^ One-Act Play contest of -^ gions I, VI, and VII, will and a great number of fans (espe­ Minor changes are often necessary from one edition to another. cially teachers at the District Con­ ment of drama at The Univer­ the Interscholastic League be held April 18 instead of vention) stated that the radio an­ sity of Texas, who will serve State Meet, May 2 and 3, will April 20 at Texas Technologi­ nouncer was tops and the broad­ as State One-Act Play Direc­ Wednesday, May 1, 1946 be Miss Helene Blattner, as­ cal College, Lubbock, South­ cast was clear.
    [Show full text]
  • 137733NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. -.. ~ r---~~~--------' • Thru: 3/31/92 U.S. COAST GUARD \ " DIGEST OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ~. L STATISTICS Compiled by (G-OLE -1 ) I I!:'::l, , L~.~Jr CJ" If"\i. .§J~ ;J f I I. '-----_________----1 II I The U.S. Coast Guard's General Digest of Law Enforcement Statistics is published semi-annually. It is distributed primarily within the Coast Guard. It is, however, provided to interested agencies and individuals on request. • This booklet represents the most recent information available for the reported period. Some changes may occasionally be noted for prior year information as cases are reviewed and updated. The information presented herein is compiled, reviewed, and promulgated by the Operational Law Enforcement Division of U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters. To provide comments or ask questions please call (202) 267-1766 (FTS callers use same number without area code). To aid the reader in corresponding with this office, our mailing address is provided below: Commandant (G-OLE-1) USCG Headquarters Room 3110 2100 2nd Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20593-0001 • 137733 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Po in Is of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this nqa '1'%1 material has been granted by U.S. Coast GJard~ ___________ to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate's Report
    CANDIDATE’S REPORT (to be filed by a candidate or his principal campaign committee) 1.Qualifying Name and Address of Candidate 2. Office Sought (Include title of office as OFFICE USE ONLY well CHARLIE CALDWELL Report Number: 15787 City Marshal 9209 Midvale Street Shreveport Date Filed: 10/27/2008 Shreveport, LA 71118 Report Includes Schedules: Schedule A-1 Schedule A-2 Schedule A-3 Schedule E-1 3. Date of Primary 10/4/2008 This report covers from 9/15/2008 through 10/15/2008 4. Type of Report: 180th day prior to primary 40th day after general 90th day prior to primary Annual (future election) 30th day prior to primary Supplemental (past election) 10th day prior to primary X 10th day prior to general Amendment to prior report 5. FINAL REPORT if: Withdrawn Filed after the election AND all loans and debts paid Unopposed 6. Name and Address of Financial Institution 7. Full Name and Address of Treasurer (You are required by law to use one or more banks, savings and loan associations, or money market mutual fund as the depository of all SHREVEPORT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION P O Box 3261 Shreveport, LA 71133 9. Name of Person Preparing Report SHARON D THOMAS Daytime Telephone 3188659206 10. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that the information contained in this report and the attached 8. FOR PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES ONLY schedules is true and correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief, and that no a. Name and address of principal campaign committee, expenditures have been made nor contributions received that have not been reported herein, committee’s chairperson, and subsidiary committees, if and that no information required to be reported by the Louisiana Campaign Finance Disclosure any (use additional sheets if necessary).
    [Show full text]
  • STARFLEET Communiqué Volume I, No
    STARFLEET: THE INTERNATIONAL STAR TREK FAN ASSOCIATION ISSUE 99 JUNE / JULY 2000 STARFLEET REGION ONE SUMMIT REPORT Captain Linda Oakley, R1 Summit Coordinator Bennu Station Gatlinburg Again Gatlinburg, Recruiting, Security, Shuttle $2400.00 for various charities. The items Charities helped through this event are Tennessee has had the honor of hosting Operations, JAG, STARFLEET sold at the auction ranged from novelty Sevier County Food Ministries, Lions the STARFLEET, Region One Summit. Operations, Alien Ambassador Corp. science fiction items to autographed Club, Childrens Hospital, Space Camp The Sixth Summit was themed as the and Charities. The banquet sported a STAR TREK books and pictures. From Fund (one student from Sevier County STARFLEET ACADEMY EAST, Class Charity Auction which raised over handmade items to rare magazines. The goes to Space Camp each year), of 2000. The various courses offered at STARFLEET Scholarship Fund. A big the STARFLEET Academy were made thanks to our Auctioneers David available to the participants onsite. The Klingman, Jack Hopkins and Academy also held a silent auction of Dominique Oakley. various items to raise money to support the program. Following the banquet and auction the participants attended the Prom (and The River Terrace Convention Center Wedding Reception), under the glitter was the Academy East Campus from of over 400 gold stars they danced to Friday, April 28 th to Sunday, the 30th. the music of Jay Stevens until 2am. A The campus also sported a Museum wonderful time was had by everyone (model contest), a Physical Education present. Program, (Lazer Tag at Fort Fun, Miniature Golf at Camp Thunder, Tug- This was the largest of the six summits O-War on the grounds of the River to be held in Gatlinburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Turquoise Bay Resort, Roatan, Honduras +
    The Private, Exclusive Guide for Serious Divers October 2016 Vol. 31, No. 10 Turquoise Bay Resort, Roatan, Honduras an easy, pleasant getaway Dear Fellow Diver, IN THIS ISSUE: Having dived Roatan regularly for many years, I was Turquoise Bay Resort, Roatan, sorely disappointed on my last trip to Fantasy Island, Honduras ................. 1 which was rundown and awash in sewer smells (see my Stop Using Zeagle Grace and Zeagle Undercurrent article, August 2015). I vowed this year to Element BCDs Immediately .. 2 find a better resort. After all, I like the convenience Reef Sharks – Are They of Roatan, the easy diving, and the stress-less week. As Over-Valued? .............. .3 it turned out, my visit to Turquoise Bay went about as Managing Dive Trip Expectations 6 well as I had hoped -- which it should on this Bay Island Salad Dressing to the Rescue! .. 7 with plenty of resorts, dive operators and American Consuming Sharks May Drive tourists. You Crazy? ................ .8 Saturdays never start stress-less at the Roatan air- Two Groups of Divers Lost Within a Week ............. 9 port, since it’s their busy day -- three other planes had arrived in the hour before ours, and with only three When You’re Underwater, You Can Become a Client Scientist 9 immigration officers working the desk, lines were long. I had sprung for a first-class ticket, since the rates Rumbles of Dissent .......... 10 were not exorbitant, so I was among the first out of the Pre-Dive Diver Negligence .... 14 sun and inside the terminal, although the lack of a/c What Do Fish Know? More Than offered no respite.
    [Show full text]
  • Detach for Cause: Examining the Organizational and Cultural Influences on the Dismissal of Surface Warfare Commanding Officers
    Detach for Cause: Examining the Organizational and Cultural Influences on the Dismissal of Surface Warfare Commanding Officers A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School Valdosta State University in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION in Public Administration in the Department of Political Science of the College of Arts and Sciences May 2014 Michael John Higgs MA, Naval War College, 1997 MPA, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 1996 MA, Webster University, 1986 BBA, Armstrong State College, 1978 © Copyright 2014 Michael John Higgs All Rights Reserved This dissertation, "Detach for Cause: Examining the Organizational and Cultural Influences on the Dismissal of Surface Warfare Commanding Officers,” by Michael John Higgs, is approved by: Dissertation Committee Gerald A. Merwin, Ph.D. Chair Professor of Public Administration / Committee v— <- —I j —L-A-— Members Carl M. Hand, Ph.D. Professor of Sociology Mary Elfeanor Wickersham, D.P.A. Assistant Professor of Public Affairs College of Coastal Georgia Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Connie L. Richards, Ph.D. Professor of English Interim Dean of the Graduate School JameiJP. LaPlant, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science FAIR USE This dissertation is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94­ 553, revised in 1976). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of the material for financial gain without the author’s expressed written permission is not allowed. DUPLICATION I authorize the Head of Interlibrary Loan or the Head of Archives at the Odum Library at Valdosta State University to arrange for duplication of this dissertation for educational or scholarly purposes when so requested by a library user.
    [Show full text]
  • Two US Navy's Submarines
    Now available to the public by subscription. See Page 63 Volume 2018 2nd Quarter American $6.00 Submariner Special Election Issue USS Thresher (SSN-593) America’s two nuclear boats on Eternal Patrol USS Scorpion (SSN-589) More information on page 20 Download your American Submariner Electronically - Same great magazine, available earlier. Send an E-mail to [email protected] requesting the change. ISBN List 978-0-9896015-0-4 American Submariner Page 2 - American Submariner Volume 2018 - Issue 2 Page 3 Table of Contents Page Number Article 3 Table of Contents, Deadlines for Submission 4 USSVI National Officers 6 Selected USSVI . Contacts and Committees AMERICAN 6 Veterans Affairs Service Officer 6 Message from the Chaplain SUBMARINER 7 District and Base News This Official Magazine of the United 7 (change of pace) John and Jim States Submarine Veterans Inc. is 8 USSVI Regions and Districts published quarterly by USSVI. 9 Why is a Ship Called a She? United States Submarine Veterans Inc. 9 Then and Now is a non-profit 501 (C) (19) corporation 10 More Base News in the State of Connecticut. 11 Does Anybody Know . 11 “How I See It” Message from the Editor National Editor 12 2017 Awards Selections Chuck Emmett 13 “A Guardian Angel with Dolphins” 7011 W. Risner Rd. 14 Letters to the Editor Glendale, AZ 85308 18 Shipmate Honored Posthumously . (623) 455-8999 20 Scorpion and Thresher - (Our “Nuclears” on EP) [email protected] 22 Change of Command Assistant Editor 23 . Our Brother 24 A Boat Sailor . 100-Year Life Bob Farris (315) 529-9756 26 Election 2018: Bios [email protected] 41 2018 OFFICIAL BALLOT 43 …Presence of a Higher Power Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 1 Introduction
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 1: Introduction Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 1: Introduction. The other parts are: Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Sheet
    TACTICALL NAVY REFERENCES Internal Communication External Communication TactiCall gives you complete control and fast access to all net- TactiCall is a perfect match for Task- or coalition force operations, works on board your vessel. Be it Functional Nets including teleph- including other military arms. SOF teams, air force, marine detach- ony, public address, entertainment systems and the like or Fighting ments and even civil and NGO agencies can be important players Nets handling alarms, broadcasts and orders, weapon teams or in the operation. More often than not, this setup includes a multi- mission control. tude of different frequency bands, networks and radio equipment. TactiCall will integrate all these into one simple and easy to use TactiCall is highly flexible and scalable, it is platform independent solution that permits everybody to reach each other regardless of and will integrate seamlessly into your combat management sys- equipment and technology used. tem of choice. In other words TactiCall lets you control all internal communication on board your vessel and with features such as TactiCall will allow key features for modern day operations like red/ record and playback helps you log and later analyze your commu- black separation, multi-level security operations, global public ad- nication flows. dress and allowing government or task force commanders to com- municate directly with whoever needs to be addressed in a given situation - facilitating a much smoother and more rapid “Statement of No Objections” chain. Contact Porten
    [Show full text]