DOCSLIB.ORG

Street Checks and Canadian Youth: a Critical Legal Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Street Checks and Canadian Youth: a Critical Legal Analysis View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Saskatchewan's Research Archive STREET CHECKS AND CANADIAN YOUTH: A CRITICAL LEGAL ANALYSIS A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Laws In the College of Law University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By CHRISTINA ABBOTT © Copyright Christina Marion Abbott, September 2017. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis/dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis/dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis/dissertation work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis/dissertation or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis/dissertation. Requests for permission to copy or to make other uses of materials in this thesis/dissertation in whole or part should be addressed to: Dean of the College of Law University of Saskatchewan 15 Campus Drive Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A6 Canada OR Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies Room 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9 Canada i Abstract Street checks occur when (a) a police officer engages with an individual, (b) in circumstances where the police officer does not have sufficient grounds to detain the individual, (c) the police officer elicits information from that individual, and (d) the individual’s information is stored in a police database. Street checks recently became a topic of discussion in many legal debates and in newspaper articles across Canada. Some individuals argue that street checks are conducted in a discriminatory manner and raise concerns about the constitutionality of the practice. Others argue that street checks are an important investigative tool that contributes to public safety. Unfortunately, absent from most of these debates is a discussion about the impact of street checks on youth, who are heavily targeted by the practice. Stastistics reveal that young males from racial minority groups are disproportionately targeted for police stops, and the pattern is mirrored in street check data. Some of the harmful effects of disproportionately conducting street checks on young racialized males will be considered in my thesis. In my thesis, I analyze the constitutionality of street checks using the framework of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Provisions of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms that are engaged by street checks include, but are not limited to, the right to not be arbitrarily detained, the right to silence, the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and the right to counsel. The Youth Criminal Justice Act occasionally offers rights and protections that overlap with those offered by the Charter, for example, the right to silence and the right to counsel; however, the Youth Criminal Justice Act also extends beyond Charter protections, by restricting the use and retention of youth records and guaranteeing the right to enhanced procedural protections. Next, I discuss the Regulations that were passed in Ontario to govern street check practices, and I analyze whether the Regulations sufficiently address the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Youth Criminal Justice Act infringements. Ultimately, I conclude that concerns continue to exist regarding the constitutionality of street checks and that street checks involving young people should be banned. It does not appear that any Regulations or policies could be passed that would allow street checks to be conducted in a manner that complies with the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Sarah Buhler for her guidance, encouragement, and ongoing support. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Professor Glen Luther and Professor Mark Carter, for your valuable feedback. Also, thank you to the Law Society of Saskatchewan and the University of Saskatchewan for providing me with the funding to pursue my Master of Laws degree. Additionally, I would like to thank Professor Heather Heavin as Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and the staff at the College of Law for assisting me throughout my enrollment in the Master of Laws program. iii Dedication This work is dedicated to my father John and stepmother Anna, my sister Julia, my partner Uche for his support, and to the memory of my mother Marion. iv Table of Contents Permission to Use .................................................................................................................................................. i Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................ iii Dedication .............................................................................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................. v Chapter I: Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter II: Establishing a Definition for Street Checks ............................................................................ 4 Chapter III: Racialized Policing and the Context in which Street Checks Occur .............................. 8 (a) Prevalence of Discriminatory Police Practices .......................................................... 8 (b) Prevalence of Discriminatory Police Practices during Street Checks ................... 13 (c) Impact of Discriminatory Street Checks .................................................................. 16 (i) Infringing on the Rights of Marginalized Youth Occupying the Streets ............................................................................................................. 17 (ii) Sense of Injustice and Disempowerment ..................................................... 18 (iii) Perpetuating the Misconception of Racialized Youth as Criminal .......... 20 (iv) Time Lost and Stress Experienced during a Street Check ........................ 22 (v) Unwillingness to Participate in the Justice System ..................................... 25 (d) Summary of the Context, Circumstances and Impact of Street Checks ............... 26 Chapter IV: An Examination of Street Check Practices Using the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Youth Criminal Justice Act ................................................................................................... 28 (a) Arbitrary Detention ................................................................................................... 29 (i) What is a “Detention”? ................................................................................... 29 (ii) When is the Detention “Arbitrary”? ............................................................ 33 (iii) Do Street Check Interactions Amount to a Detention? ............................. 36 (iv) Is the Detention that Arises during a Street Check Arbitrary? ................ 43 (b) The Right to Silence ................................................................................................... 44 (c) The Right to Counsel .................................................................................................. 48 (d) The Retention of Youth Records .............................................................................. 51 (e) Enhanced Procedural Protections for Youth .......................................................... 57 Chapter V: Proposed Solutions to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Youth Criminal Justice Act Infringements, as outlined in Ontario’s Regulations, The Collection of Identifying Information in Certain Circumstances ....................................................................................................... 58 (a) Consent Required from Participants ........................................................................ 58 (b) Grounds for Conducting a Street Check ................................................................. 65 (c) Prohibition on Arbitrary Street Checks ................................................................... 66 (d) Time Limits Imposed on Record Retention ............................................................. 67 Chapter VI: Proposed Steps Forward .......................................................................................................... 71 Chapter VII: Conclusion
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2009-2010 Athlete Carding
    2009-2010 ATHLETE CARDING Senior Provincial Carding - Thirty Cards: The top 30 FINA scoring swimmers based on Olympic events from selected Long Course competitions. Funding level is based on the following FINA Point thresholds. Performance Threshold 900+ FINA Points = $6000 880 FINA Points = $5000 850 FINA Points = $4000 800 FINA Points = $3000 Junior Provincial Carding – Ten Cards: The top 5 FINA scoring females 16 & under and the top 5 FINA scoring males 17 & under each receive $1000, (10 X $1000 = $10,000); excluding swimmers who qualify for the Senior Carding (30 spots). Selected Long Course Competitions in 2009 - Ontario Carding. • Junior Pan Pacific Swimming Championships (January - Guam) • Australian Youth Olympic Festival (January - Australia) • 2009 Charlotte UltraSwim - (May - North Carolina) • Grand Prix Mel Zajac International • Grand Prix Quebec Cup • Swim Ontario Long Course Senior Championships (June - Etobicoke) • Swim Ontario Junior Provincials (July - Etobicoke) • World University Games (July - Serbia) • SNC Summer Nationals (July - Montreal) • Canadian Age Group Championships (July - Montreal) • 13th FINA World Championships (July/August – Italy) • Long Course Dual Meet (August - Great Britain) TBC • North American Challenge Cup (August - Mexico) 1 Criteria and Guidelines Payment: • Carding money is payable to the individual athlete. • Ontario Residents: Receive 50% after the SNC Canada Cup in November 2009, and 50% after the SNC Spring Nationals in April 2010. • Out of Province Swimmers: Funding will be prorated on the amount of time (monthly basis) the athlete resides and trains in Ontario during the competitive season (September 2009 to August 20010). Payment will be made after SNC Spring Nationals in April 2010. It is the responsibility of the athlete (or their family) to notify Swim Ontario with proof of athlete residence and training conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-06-15 Joint TPP Complaint Final
    Vancouver Police Board 2120 Cambie Street Vancouver, BC V56 4N6 Via Email June 15, 2021 Dear Police Board Members, RE: Service & Policy Complaint Regarding the VPD Trespass Prevention Program On January 28, 2021, a group of seven Indigenous, women’s, Downtown Eastside and legal organizations voiced their opposition to the Trespass Prevention Program.1 Despite the concerns raised, the Trespass Prevention program has not been cancelled. We understand that businesses and stratas are still able to qualify for the program, which authorizes all police officers of the Vancouver Police Department (VPD) to act as authorized representatives and take enforcement action based on VPD officers’ reasonable belief that the person is acting in contravention to the BC Trespass Act.2 Further to the statement issued in January 2021, we are now filing a Service and Policy Complaint in accordance with s. 168 of British Columbia’s Police Act. 1 https://www.pivotlegal.org/end_trespass_prevention_program 2 Vancouver Police Department, “Trespass Prevention Program” intake form (Appendix A) In light of the reviews initiated by the Director of Police Services into how the VPD board handled a previous service and policy complaint,3 we expect the board to consider the relevant and available findings of the review(s) in its response to this complaint. Complaint Specifically, we are writing to complain about the inappropriate creation of the Trespass Prevention Program (TPP), as reported by the VPD in a report dated October 19, 2020.4 Based on VPD Report 2010C02, the VPD describes a TPP as an initiative that was recently launched, “which gives police written consent from the property owner to move along unwanted parties from private property.”5 We submit that the lack of transparency about how the TPP has been initiated and managed highlights fundamental problems related to the general direction and management of the VPD as well as the inadequacy and inappropriateness of VPD internal procedures and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing and Surveilling the Black Community in Toronto, Canada, 1992-2016
    From the Yonge Street Riot to the Carding Controversy: Policing and Surveilling the Black Community in Toronto, Canada, 1992-2016 By Maria Kyres A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Program in Cultural Studies in Conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September, 2017 Copyright © Maria Kyres Abstract In the last decade, the conversation surrounding racial profiling and carding in the city of Toronto garnered much public and scholarly attention. Many journalists, academics and activists have examined the Community Contacts Policy, also known as carding, as well as mass incarceration and the police shootings and killings of unarmed, young Black men. The Yonge Street Uprising and the carding controversy in Toronto serve as two case studies to explore the ways that Black men have been disproportionately profiled, policed and surveilled in this country, particularly in the province of Ontario. Despite the fact that the Yonge Street Uprising and the carding controversy occurred decades apart, a common thread throughout both cases was the narrative of Black male criminality. In addition, it became apparent that many of the practices employed in contemporary society, such as racial profiling, carding and mass incarceration were derived from slavery, with the goal of limiting the freedom and mobility of Black people. Therefore, an examination of Canada’s historical treatment of Black people is necessary in order to demonstrate how practices rooted in slavery, such as, fugitive slave advertisements and historical representations of Black criminality helped inform current police practices. Through an analysis of historical, legal, criminological, and critical race scholarship, this work seeks to examine how and why Black people, specifically Black men, were and continue to be disproportionately more likely to be policed, surveilled and incarcerated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs of Charter Litigation
    The Costs of Charter Litigation Alan Young Research and Statistics Division May 3, 2016 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the Department of Justice Canada. For more information, please contact the Department of Justice Canada at: www.justice.gc.ca. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, 2017 ISBN 978-0-660-07504-4 Cat. No. J2-441/2017E-PDF The Costs of Charter Litigation Introduction The enactment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 fundamentally altered both the substance and form of constitutional review. In the first decade of Charter litigation, many novel claims were advanced and resolved, yet there still remained a great deal of confusion with respect to the scope of the substantive principles and the procedural mechanisms for raising and applying them. After 35 years, most of the relevant constitutional principles have been solidified and clarified, as have the guidelines on the procedures for mounting a constitutional challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • George Committees Party Appointments P.20 Young P.28 Primer Pp
    EXCLUSIVE POLITICAL COVERAGE: NEWS, FEATURES, AND ANALYSIS INSIDE HARPER’S TOOTOO HIRES HOUSE LATE-TERM GEORGE COMMITTEES PARTY APPOINTMENTS P.20 YOUNG P.28 PRIMER PP. 30-31 CENTRAL P.35 TWENTY-SEVENTH YEAR, NO. 1322 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2016 $5.00 NEWS SENATE REFORM NEWS FINANCE Monsef, LeBlanc LeBlanc backs away from Morneau to reveal this expected to shed week Trudeau’s whipped vote on assisted light on deficit, vision for non- CIBC economist partisan Senate dying bill, but Grit MPs predicts $30-billion BY AbbaS RANA are ‘comfortable,’ call it a BY DEREK ABMA Senators are eagerly waiting to hear this week specific details The federal government is of the Trudeau government’s plan expected to shed more light on for a non-partisan Red Cham- Charter of Rights issue the size of its deficit on Monday, ber from Government House and one prominent economist Leader Dominic LeBlanc and Members of the has predicted it will be at least Democratic Institutions Minister Joint Committee $30-billion—about three times Maryam Monsef. on Physician- what the Liberals promised dur- The appearance of the two Assisted ing the election campaign—due to ministers at the Senate stand- Suicide, lower-than-expected tax revenue ing committee will be the first pictured at from a slow economy and the time the government has pre- a committee need for more fiscal stimulus. sented detailed plans to reform meeting on the “The $10-billion [deficit] was the Senate. Also, this is the first Hill. The Hill the figure that was out there official communication between Times photograph based on the projection that the the House of Commons and the by Jake Wright economy was growing faster Senate on Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Street Checks: What the Literature Doesn’T Tell Us Laura Huey University of Western Ontario, [email protected]
    Western University Scholarship@Western Sociology Publications Sociology Department Winter 2019 Street Checks: What the Literature Doesn’t Tell Us Laura Huey University of Western Ontario, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/sociologypub Part of the Sociology Commons Citation of this paper: Huey, Laura, "Street Checks: What the Literature Doesn’t Tell Us" (2019). Sociology Publications. 47. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/sociologypub/47 Street Checks: What the Literature Doesn’t Tell Us Prof. Laura Huey, University of Western Ontario Introduction In response to a request I received on the state of research concerning street checks1, I attempted to conduct a systematic review (SR) of the published research literature. This SR was intended to address the following questions: 1. Are street checks effective in deterring crimes? 2. Are street checks effective in solving past crimes? 3. What is the present state of the Canadian research literature on street checks? As there were too few studies to address each question2 – and several of the studies are highly limited due to methodological issues – instead of conducting a meta-analysis or a fully developed systematic review, I have opted to provide a brief narrative analysis in response to each of the questions posed. Method of Inquiry To address the research questions posed above, I have conducted a systematic review (SR) of the research literature on street checks. A SR is a technique for “finding, sifting, sorting and synthesizing the findings of primary evaluations relevant to particular interventions” (Johnson et al. 2015: 460). In advance of beginning the finding phase of research, the researcher constructs a set of questions to be answered, as well as a set of well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria 1 A proactive policing initiative also known as ‘carding,’ ‘stop and frisk’, ‘SQF (stop, question and frisk’ and ‘stop and search.’ 2 For Question 1, I identified 9 (n=9) relevant articles.
    [Show full text]
  • 14Th Annual Report the Canada Council 1970-1971
    1 14th Annual Report The Canada Council 1970-1971 Honourable Gérard Pelletier Secretary of State of Canada Ottawa, Canada Sir, I have the honour to transmit herewith the Annual Report of the Canada Council, for submission to Parliament, as required by section 23 of the Canada Council Act (5-6 Elizabeth Ii, 1957, Chap. 3) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1971. I am, Sir, Yours very truly, John G. Prentice, Chairman. June 341971 3 Contents The Arts The Humanities and Social Sciences Other Programs 10 Introduction 50 Levels of Subsidy, 1966-67 to 1970-71 90 Prizes and Special Awards 12 Levels of Subsidy, 1966-67 to 1970-71 51 Research Training 91 Cultural Exchanges Doctoral Fe//owships; distribution of 14 Music and Opera Doctoral Fellowships by discipline. 96 Canadian Commission for Unesco 21 Theatre 54 Research Work 100 Stanley House Leave Fellowships; distribution of Leave 27 Dance Fellowships by discipline; Research Finances Grants; distribution of Research Grants 102 Introduction 30 Visual Arts, Film and Photography by disciph’ne; list of Leave Fellowships, Killam Awards and large Research 105 Financial Statement 39 Writing Grants. Appendix 1 48 Other Grants 78 Research Communication 119 List of Doctoral Fellowships List of grants for publication, confer- ences, and travel to international Appendix 2 meetings. 125 List of Research Grants of less than $5,000 86 Special Grants Support of Learned Societies; Appendix 3 Other Assistance. 135 List of Securities March 31. 1971 Members John G. Prentice (Chairman) Brian Flemming Guy Rocher (Vice-Chairman) John M. Godfrey Ronald Baker Elizabeth A. Lane Jean-Charles Bonenfant Léon Lortie Alex Colville Byron March J.
    [Show full text]
  • Trudeau to Become Second Prime Minister to Have Office in West Block
    EXCLUSIVE POLITICAL COVERAGE: NEWS, FEATURES,S, AND AANANALYSISNAALYSIS INSIDEI SAY ‘NO’ TO A BANK OF - ENERGY REFERENDUM CANADA’S ANTI POLICY ON ELECTORAL NARRATIVE TERROR BRIEFING REFORM P. 11 MISPLACED P. 13 TOOLS P. 10 PP. 17-28 TWENTY-SEVENTH YEAR, NO. 1362 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER MONDAY, AUGUST 15, 2016 $5.00 NEWS SUPREME COURT NEWS PARLIAMENT BUILDINGS NEWS CONSERVATIVES Atlantic Liberal Trudeau to become Bernier, Clement MP says next lead declared Supreme Court second prime Conservative judge should be candidates in minister to have survey, but more from region would prefer BY RACHEL AIELLO offi ce in West Block someone else Rookie Nova Scotia Liberal MP Colin Fraser says he’s concerned about Atlantic BY DEREK ABMA Canada no longer being guaranteed a seat on the Supreme Court of Canada under his To date, only Canada’s second prime minister, and first Liberal Conservative MP Maxime Bernier has government’s new appointment process one, Sir Alexander Mackenzie has had an office in West Block. a narrow edge over Conservative MP Tony and wants “strengthened confi rmation” that Clement among declared candidates in the the next candidate will be from the region. Conservative leadership race, according to “My constituents have expressed their a new survey, though the same poll indi- concern that apparently we may not neces- cates a greater number of Canadians are sarily have a guaranteed seat as is the cus- undecided or waiting for another candidate tom. So I have no problem expressing that to come forward. point of view—and I agree with it—to the A phone survey of 1,345 Canadians minister and to the government,” the MP by Forum Research, conducted on Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • “This Issue Has Been with Us for Ages”
    “THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN WITH US FOR AGES” A COMMUNITY-BASED ASSESSMENT OF POLICE CONTACT CARDING IN 31 DIVISION FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2014 "THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN WITH US FOR AGES -- I REMEMBER PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT CHANGING THIS WHEN I WAS A TEENAGER. NOTHING HAS CHANGED." – SURVEY RESPONDENT, 31 DIVISION LOGICALOUTCOMES C/O CENTRE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION 720 BATHURST STREET TORONTO, ON CANADA - M5S 2R4 [email protected] 1-674-478-5634 2 CAPP TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 64 RECOMMENDATIONS 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 67 FINAL REPORT APPENDICES 9 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES APPENDIX A: The Police Are Going To Get A Backlash 10 NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY APPENDIX B: CAPP Community Advisory Committee Terms of Reference 14 INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS THIS STUDY ABOUT? APPENDIX C: Ethics Certificate From The Community 1.1 Study objectives Research Ethics Office 1.2 What Do We Know About Contact Carding? Numbers, Patterns and Controversies APPENDIX D: CAPP Survey Questionnaire 21 METHODOLOGY: WHAT METHODS DID WE USE TO ANSWER OUR QUESTIONS? 2.1 CAPP’s Research Approach 2.2 Survey Research Design and Questionnaire 2.3 Survey Sampling Approach 31 FINDINGS: WHAT DID WE LEARN FROM THE SURVEY? 3.1 Respondents’ Characteristics 3.2 Experiences of Respondents Who Have Been Carded 3.3 Experiences of Respondents Who Have Been Recently Carded (after June 2014) 3.4 Perspectives on Police Carding Practices in 31 Division 3.5 Perceptions of Racial Profiling 3.6 Perceptions of Police in 31 Division: Trust, Power and Respect 3.7 Satisfaction with Policing in 31 Division 3.8 Awareness of the New Community Contacts Policy 3.9 Concerns about Police-Community Relationships 51 FURTHER ELABORATIONS: AN IN-DEPTH DISCUSSION OF THE SURVEY 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Ontario Energy Board February 26, 2013
    Updated February 27, 2014 EB-2013-0196 / 0187 / 0198 EVIDENCE OF PAULA ZARNETT ON BEHALF OF ESSEX POWERLINES CORPORATION, BLUEWATER POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, AND NIAGARA-ON-THE-LAKE HYDRO In the Matter of Application by Hydro One Inc. EB-2013-0196 Application by Norfolk Power Inc. EB-2013-0187 Application by Hvdro One Networks Inc. EB-2013-0198 Before the Ontario Energy Board February 26, 2013 BDR 34 King Street East Suite 1000 Toronto, ON M5C 2X8 BDR 416-214-4848 phone 416-214-1643 fax Evidence of Paula Zarnett on behalf of EBN EB-2013-0196, EB-2013-0187, EB-2013-0198 Before the Ontario Energy Board February 26, 2014 / Updated February 27, 2014 Page 1 (TOC) Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE........................................................................................ 2 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................ 2 Operating and Capital Expenditure Costs............................................................ 2 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ............................... 6 2 COST STRUCTURES OF HONI AND NPDI ................................................. 8 2.1 CONCEPTUAL OVERVIEW............................................................................... 8 2.2 IMPORTANT BUSINESS CONDITIONS AND OUTPUTS THAT AFFECT THE COSTS TO SERVE NPDI’S CUSTOMERS ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Street Checks and Carding: an Exploration of a Sergeant's Capacity to Achieve Policy Conformance from Frontline Police Offic
    STREET CHECKS AND CARDING: AN EXPLORATION OF A SERGEANT’S CAPACITY TO ACHIEVE POLICY CONFORMANCE FROM FRONTLINE POLICE OFFICERS by Paul Barry Rinkoff M.A., University of Guelph 2011 H.B.Sc., University of Toronto 2006 A dissertation presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. Policy Studies in the Program of Policy Studies Ryerson University Toronto, Ontario, Canada September 11, 2018 ©(Paul Barry Rinkoff) 2018 Author’s Declaration AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A DISSERTATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this dissertation. This is a true copy of the dissertation, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this dissertation to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this dissertation by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my dissertation may be made electronically available to the public. ii Street Checks And Carding: An Exploration Of A Sergeant’s Capacity To Achieve Policy Conformance From Frontline Police Officers Doctorate of Philosophy 2018 Paul Barry Rinkoff Policy Studies Ryerson University Abstract This study aims to fill a void in the extant policy implementation literature that has overlooked the contribution of sergeants to the successful adoption of policy decisions at the frontlines. By focusing on the Regulated Interactions Policy of the Toronto Police Service and adopting a sociological institutionalism perspective, 17 sergeants representing each of the 17 divisions of the Toronto Police Service were interviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • COURT of APPEAL for ONTARIO CATZMAN, CHARRON And
    DATE: 20000731 DOCKET: C28066 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CATZMAN, CHARRON and ROSENBERG JJ.A. B E T W E E N : ) ) Alan Young and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) Paul Burstein, ) for the appellant Respondent ) ) - and - ) Morris Pistyner and ) Kevin Wilson, CHRISTOPHER CLAY ) for the respondent ) Applicant/ ) Appellant ) ) Heard: October 6, 7 and 8, 1999 ) On appeal from his conviction by Mr. Justice J. F. McCart, sitting without a jury, on August 14, 1997 ROSENBERG J.A.: [1] This is one of two appeals heard by this court concerning the constitutionality of the marihuana prohibition in the former Narcotic Control Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N-1 and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19.1 The Crown appeal in R. v. Parker concerns the medical use of marihuana. This appeal centres primarily on the use of the criminal law power to penalize the possession of marihuana. [2] The appellant owned a store called “The Great Canadian Hemporium”. In addition to selling items such as hemp products, marihuana logos and pipes, the appellant sold small marihuana plant seedlings from his store. The appellant is an active advocate for the decriminalization of marihuana. The appellant does not require marihuana for any 1 In 1997, the Narcotic Control Act was repealed by the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19. Page: 2 personal medical reason although he did sell marihuana cuttings from his store to persons who did. [3] An undercover police officer bought a small marihuana cutting at the store. The police also seized marihuana cuttings and a small amount of marihuana when they executed search warrants at the appellant’s store and home.
    [Show full text]