Point of Care The “Point of Care” section answers everyday clinical questions by providing practical information that aims to be useful at the point of patient care. The responses reflect the opinions of the contributors and do not purport to set forth standards of care or clinical practice guidelines. Readers are encouraged to do more reading on the topics covered. If you would like to contribute to this section, contact editor-in-chief Dr. John O’Keefe at [email protected].

Q u e s t i o n 1 How can I limit the number of different dental cements available in my dental practice and still be able to address all prosthetic clinical situations?

Background cements currently being used in our prosthodontic s a clinician’s repertoire expands to include group practice (Table 1). various indirect restorations, there is a ten- Adency to accumulate a large number of dif- Choice of Dental Cements ferent dental cements in the office. As prosthetic Conventional Fixed materials each demand specific luting agents, Provisional restorations can be cemented with logistic headaches arise for both the and calcium hydroxide (Dycal, Dentsply International, staff. Regrettably, the “universal” dental cement is York, Penn.), as this material is easy to manipulate, still elusive. readily available and does not interfere with or Several types of dental cement are available, compromise the integrity of the permanent ce- each possessing unique properties and handling ment. One generally places it on the margins of an characteristics; no one product is ideal for every interim restoration, then seats the restoration. The type of restoration. A dental cement should act as should not be filled with cement as this can a barrier against microbiological leakage, holding lead to difficulties when trying to remove it. This the tooth and restoration together through some cement sets rapidly and excess cement is easily form of attachment (mechanical, chemical or a cleaned up. combination) and sealing the interface between Three other cements are required to ad- 1 them. Manipulation of any cement is important, dress all aspects of . C&B as variations in the powder-to-liquid ratio can Metabond (Parkell, Edgewood, N.Y.) is the cement significantly influence working and setting time, of choice for nonprecious metals, such as resin- consistency and flow and the degree of solubility, bonded bridges and bonded posts in endodontic- 2 strength and film thickness of the cement. In this ally treated teeth. This cement is formulated with article, I discuss and justify the choice of dental methyl methacrylate monomer and acrylic resin filler and is catalyzed by tributyl-borane. It bonds Table 1 Cements used for different types of restorations to enamel, dentin and metal. The use of a C-R Type of restoration Dental cement syringe (Centrix, Shelton, Conn.) reduces voids in the cement and allows the clinician to con- Conventional fixed prosthodontics trol the placement of the cement with great ease Provisional restoration Dycal (Figs. 1–3). This adhesive cement is invaluable for Cast C&B Metabond patients who present with fractured porcelain and Resin-bonded C&B Metabond exposed metal on a porcelain-fused-to-metal res- toration. Masking the exposed metal with opaque Metal inlay/onlay/full crown Maxcem C&B Metabond provides an excellent esthetic re- Porcelain inlay/onlay/crown sult when a porcelain repair is indicated. Porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration Maxcem A dental cement that is proving to be a work- Porcelain veneers Nexus 3 horse for most indirect restorations is Maxcem Implant-supported prostheses (Kerr Corp., Orange, Calif.). This self-etching, self-adhering cement is a dual-cure resin cement Alumina abutments Maxcem that is dispensed directly with an auto-mixing syr- Zirconia abutments Nexus 3 inge. Once the restoration is seated, excess material /gold alloy abutments Improv can be light cured for several seconds allowing for easy clean-up. It is indicated for all metal and

���JCDA • www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • 697 ––––––– Point of Care –––––

Figure 1: Mixing and loading C&B Metabond into a Centrix syringe tube.

Figure 2: The C-R syringe. Figure 3: Expressing the cement for a cast Figure 4: Excess Improv cement for an post and core restoration. implant-supported porcelain-fused-to- metal restoration cemented on a gold alloy abutment.

ceramic inlays, onlays and full coverage restorations. cements promises to streamline the inventory of Anecdotally, patients have not reported any pos- a dental practice, while allowing the clinician to toperative sensitivity when Maxcem has been used. continue to use both traditional and novel pros- The resin-luting cement Nexus 3 (Kerr) is ideal thetic materials. a for cementing porcelain veneers as it is available in a number of shades and viscosities. This cement THE AUTHOR can be light- or dual-cured.

Dr. John P. Zarb is a prosthodontist with Implant-Supported Prostheses Prosthodontic Associates and a staff prosthodontist All ceramic implant-supported prostheses at the University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital, cemented to zirconia abutments require a final Toronto, Ont. Email:���������������� [email protected]����������������. cement that is both strong and esthetic. In this The author has no declared financial interests in any company situation, either Maxcem or Nexus 3 can be used. manufacturing the types of products mentioned in this article. Improv (Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) is a References universal cement in implant prosthodontics that 1. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA,���������������������������������� Haselton DR. �����������������Current status of can be used for implant-supported prostheses in luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. ���������������J Prosthet Dent 1999; which porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations are 81(2):135–41. 2. Jones DW. Dental cements: an update. J Can Dent Assoc 1998; cemented to customized or prefabricated metal 64(8):569–70. (titanium, gold alloy) abutments (Fig. 4). As the technology of dental biomaterials con- Further Reading tinues to evolve, a universal dental cement may be- Powers JM. Cements. In: Craig RG, Powers JM, editors. Restorative come a reality. Until that time, this list of 5 dental dental materials. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 593–634.

698 JCDA��� •  www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • ––––––– Point of Care –––––

Q u e s t i o n 2 How do I select an attachment for use in a removable partial denture or overdenture?

Background Case 1 ypical considerations when selecting an at- The patient in case 1 wanted better retention tachment for a removable partial denture or and a more esthetic removable partial denture, and Toverdenture include the amount of interoc- the Bredent Vario-Kugel-Snap Sagitall (VKS-SG) clusal space available, the size and periodontal ball-and-socket stud-type attachment was selected. status of the abutment and the stress-breaking Figure 1 illustrates the use of 4 “mini” Bredent ability of the attachment. Other factors, such as VKS-SG attachments. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate retention, ease of use and anticipated lifespan of the removable partial denture in place. Because of the attachment, should also be considered, and the number of abutments and the patient’s dem- these factors are the focus of the discussion in this onstrated ability to insert and remove the partial article. The 2 most commonly used dental attach- denture easily, the yellow (regular-friction) matrix ments in our group prosthodontic practice are the was used. Bredent and Locator attachments. Attachment with an Overdenture Attachment with a Removable Partial The Locator attachment (manufactured by Zest Denture Anchors, Inc., Escondido, Calif.) is a commonly Bredent (Senden, Germany) manufactures a used attachment in our group prosthodontic prac- variety of styles of attachments suitable for use tice. It consists of a metal female component that in many applications. One of the main benefits is fixed intraorally and a nylon male component of the Bredent line of attachments is their reli- anchored in a metal housing in the denture base. ability of retention and their ease of use. The reten- It can be used either for tooth or implant applica- tive mechanism for these attachments is based on tions. Like the Bredent attachments, the nylon plastic female components (friction matrixes) that male retention elements of the Locator system sit in metal housings in the removable denture. are colour-coded according to degree of retention These friction matrixes are colour-coded: green for (blue = 1.5 lb/3.3kg, pink = 3 lb/6.6 kg, clear = reduced-friction retention, yellow for regular- 5 lb/11 kg). A green retention element is used friction retention and red for high-friction reten- for abutments of varying degrees of angulation tion. These plastic retentive components can easily (10° to 20° angle). Furthermore, the Locator has be removed and replaced at chairside by the dental a self-aligning design, whereby the male portion practitioner. A handful of the matrixes can be snaps into the female portion. Patients with this stocked at little cost and replaced as needed. The attachment find it very easy to insert and remove selection of a particular friction matrix depends on their . the design of the prosthesis, the number of abut- Finally, the Locator has a very low profile, so is ments available and the patient’s manual dexterity. an ideal choice if interarch space is limited. Like

Figure 1: Palatal view of the 4 mini Figure 2: Palatal view of the removable Figure 3: Frontal view of the removable Bredent Vario-Kugel-Snap attachments. partial denture retained with Bredent Vario- partial denture. Kugel-Snap attachments.

���JCDA • www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • 699 ––––––– Point of Care –––––

Figure 4: The Locator core tool. Figure 5: The Locator attachment in the Figure 6: The blue (1.5-lb) male reten- tooth 23 root. tive element in the removable partial denture.

the friction matrixes in the Bredent attachment, accommodate the Locator attachment, which was the male retentive elements of the Locator attach- cemented with C&B Metabond adhesive resin ce- ment can be replaced easily, with minimal time ment (Parkell, Inc., Edgewood, N.Y.) (Fig. 5). The and effort, with the Locator core tool (Fig. 4). The male nylon component was then anchored in a core tool in fact incorporates 3 tools in a single metal housing in the denture base (Fig. 6). In this mechanism. The curved section of the tool, for re- situation, the blue (1.5-lb) male retentive element moval of the male portion of the attachment, has a was used. hook to catch and pull the nylon male liner out of Conclusion the permanent metal housing. The middle section Because of their retentive capacity, ease of use, is the male seating tool, used to seat a replacement versatility and lifespan, the Bredent line of at- male portion into the metal housing. The third tachments and the Locator attachment are the at- part of the tool is the abutment driver, for use in tachments of choice in our group prosthodontic an implant application. Because of its retentive practice. a capacity, ease of use, ease of maintenance and ease of replacement of components, the Locator has THE AUTHOR been our attachment of choice in patients with overdentures. Dr. Effrat Habsha is a prosthodontist with Prosthodontic Associates, staff prosthodontist at Case 2 Mount Sinai Hospital, and an associate in dentistry at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. Email: For case 2, the Locator attachment was used [email protected]. in a natural-tooth overdenture application.������ Tooth The author has no declared financial interests in any company 23 was treated endodontically and prepared to manufacturing the types of products mentioned in this article.

700 JCDA��� •  www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • ––––––– Point of Care –––––

Q u e s t i o n 3 My patients complain about food impaction around single implant restorations. Can this be managed and how can I prevent it? Background The patient must be told that although the success here are many reasons for food impaction, but rate of implants is excellent, the crowns that are it may occur more often around implants be- placed on the implants will need maintenance. Tcause they are different from natural teeth in Additional efforts are also needed because of the many respects. When a natural tooth is extracted, differential movement of implants versus natural there is often a loss of interproximal papilla, which teeth. Initial contacts are made broad and flat with may not be recreated with an implant restoration. solid resistance to removal of floss. Prevention of A larger issue is the fact that healthy implants damage to neighbouring teeth is essential and, at exhibit no mobility, whereas natural teeth move recall visits, not only must the implant be exam- varying degrees based on their periodontal condi- ined, but the adjacent teeth must also be evaluated tion and the forces placed on them. This movement for possible carious involvement. is not very noticeable until an implant becomes a Once a contact opens, treatment is designed to point of reference and movement of natural teeth close it. If the restoration is cemented in place over becomes obvious (in relation to the stationary im- an implant abutment and cannot easily be removed, plant). The difference in movement makes both bonding resin on the approximating surface of the placement of a restoration with an adequate inter- neighbouring tooth should be considered if that proximal contact and maintenance of the con- surface is suitable for bonding (enamel or dentin). tact difficult. During the recall period, when we If caries has developed, it must be treated. If the examine as well as interproximal con- neighbouring tooth has been previously restored tacts, neighbouring teeth have often moved causing with a full coverage cast restoration, the restora- an opening of the contact (Figs. 1, 2a and 2b). tion may have to be replaced (Fig. 4). The contact An open contact is associated with impaction is then made tight, but the patient must be made of food debris in soft tissue and caries in the neigh- aware that there is still potential for movement bouring teeth caused by inadequate cleaning of and treatment may be needed again. the interproximal debris. As the contact opens If the patient does not want the neighbouring further, restoration of neighbouring teeth may be tooth adjusted, the contact can be closed by slot required due to caries (Fig. 3). If left unchecked, preparation of the implant crown surface, etching caries can lead to a need for endodontic treatment with hydrofluoric acid, silanating the ceramic sur- and even extraction. face, then bonding composite resin to the area (Fig. 5). Prevention and Treatment This treatment is easier if the crown placed The possibility of implant contacts opening on the implant is designed to be removed when must be considered during treatment planning. necessary. This can be accomplished by creating a

Figure 1: An interproximal contact Figure 2a: Radiograph of implant crown Figure 2b: Radiograph of implant crown has opened between the second pre- at the time of crown placement showing at 6-month recall appointment showing an molar and first molar due to mesial acceptable mesial contact. opening mesial contact. movement of the second premolar.

���JCDA • www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • 701 ––––––– Point of Care –––––

Figure 3: An open mesial contact between Figure 4: An open mesial contact on the Figure 5: An open contact has been an implant (45) and tooth 44 has allowed implant in the 36 position has allowed col- restored by cutting into the restora- caries to develop on the distal surface of lection of debris and development of caries tive material along the mesial edge tooth 44 at the gingival crown margin of tooth 35. and bonding additional material to it. The crown on tooth 35 was replaced. The carious lesion in the distal surface of tooth 44 must now be restored.

Figure 6: Attempts to add new porcelain Figure 7: Rather than porcelain, labora- to a prosthesis that has been in the mouth tory-cured composite resin can be applied for an extended period often causes cat- to metal and serve as a final restoration. In astrophic failure of existing porcelain. future, new material can be easily added Fractured porcelain must be stripped from intraorally. the metal substructure and replaced.

screw-retained crown or a cemented crown using Implant dentistry is an excellent way to temporary cement or built-in design mechanisms replace missing teeth. However, because natural allowing easy removal. The crown can then be re- teeth and implants move differently, one must be moved from the mouth and the porcelain removed vigilant during the maintenance phase of implant from its substructure and reapplied to a greater dentistry. a interproximal dimension. Note: new porcelain cannot be added to old porcelain that has been THE AUTHOR in the mouth for an extended period; therefore, porcelain must be replaced. Forward planning Dr. Izchak Barzilay is head of the division of pros- thodontics and restorative dentistry, Mount Sinai is useful, as one can design the final restoration Hospital, and assistant professor, faculty of dentistry, from material that is easily bonded to so that fu- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. He also main- ture additions and repairs are better supported tains a private practice (Prosthodontic Associates) limited to prosthodontics and implant dentistry in (Figs. 6 and 7). Toronto. Email: [email protected].

702 JCDA��� •  www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • ––––––– Point of Care –––––

Q u e s t i o n 4 If I extract a tooth, can I use its crown as a pontic for a fixed prosthesis?

Background Clinical Case onding an extracted crown in place was A 70-year-old woman presented for dental recommended to create an early form of treatment. After an extended assessment of ver- Bresin-bonded prosthesis. Initially, com- tical dimension, her posterior occlusion was re- posite resin was applied interproximally to tem- stored with conventional porcelain-fused-to-metal porarily secure the natural tooth pontic in place restorations. The patient was concerned about until healing could occur. The tooth would then re-creating the natural esthetics of her anterior be replaced by a more conventional restoration. teeth and asked whether a lingually based res- In cases where an interim prosthesis is not avail- toration could be fabricated to preserve the es- able, use of the extracted crown is effective and thetics on the buccal surface of the anterior teeth. expedient. Various factors, including the condi- Minimal preparation of the lingual surfaces of the tion of the coronal portion of the extracted tooth, anterior teeth was performed, and lingual veneers the condition of the neighbouring teeth (coronal with incisal coverage were fabricated (Empress, and periodontal) and the ability to adequately Ivoclar, Schaan, Lichtenstein) and bonded with a isolate the region, are important considerations dual-cure composite resin cement (Nexus II, Kerr when deciding if this interim treatment modality Corporation, Orange, Calif.) (Fig. 1). is to be used. Three years after placement of the original res- For a longer-term restoration, the conven- torations, the root of the upper right central in- tional bonded prosthesis (resin-bonded bridge or cisor was fractured while the patient was chewing Maryland bridge) is an attractive option, in that it on a popcorn kernel (Fig. 2). The root had to be requires minimal tooth preparation and can be com- removed, and replacement of the tooth was indi- pleted relatively quickly. The success of this type of cated. The patient was concerned about matching restoration depends on adequate tooth preparation, the shade and texture of a new restoration to the adequate mechanical strength of the restoration, original (unrestored) buccal surface. The decision control of the forces placed on the final restoration was made to use the natural crown and the lin- and proper cementation procedures during place- gual-veneered tooth as a pontic for the long-term ment of the restoration. With the development of restoration. bonding methods and materials to connect metals, A lingual groove-and-slot preparation was cre- ceramics, composite resins and tooth structure to ated through the cingula of the lingual veneers of each other, the resin-bonded application is not only the maxillary anterior teeth. A deeper preparation effective but can also be esthetically pleasing, long lasting and func- tional. Simply bonding the crown of a tooth in place interproximally may serve as a short- term solution, but over time, this form of pros- thesis will probably fail because of debonding and fracture. This article presents a case in which a nat- ural tooth crown was bonded to neighbouring Figure 1: Buccal view of incisal exten- Figure 2: Radiograph of tooth 11 showing a teeth with the intention sions of the lingual veneers, which horizontal root fracture. of its being used as a were placed to maintain new vertical opening. longer-term restoration.

���JCDA • www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • 703 ––––––– Point of Care –––––

Figure 3: Occlusal view of the lingual ven- Figure 4: Metal frame cast so as to be short Figure 5: Metal frame laminated with eers, with a slot preparation and deeper of all margins. porcelain to fit all margins; it is ready for preparation of tooth 11. cementation.

Figure 6: Tooth 11 after extraction, ready Figure 7: The extracted crown connected Figure 8: The prosthesis bonded in for bonding of the restoration. to the metal frame, ready for bonding to the place; esthetics have been maintained. abutment teeth.

into the fractured tooth allowed for more accurate and the 2 units were bonded together with a dual- indexing of the future prosthesis (Fig. 3). A poly- cure composite resin cement (Nexus II) (Fig. 7). ether impression was made, and a nonprecious The anterior teeth were then isolated using a metal frame was fabricated (Press Alloy, Swiss rubber dam. The prepared lingual surfaces were NF, Toronto, Ont.). This frame was designed to be cleaned with pumice, rinsed and dried. The lingual short of the prepared margins (Fig. 4). The frame veneered surfaces were etched with hydrofluoric was opaqued and waxed to create the ideal shape acid, and both the new restoration and the intra- for the retainer (i.e., to fit the prepared channel) oral veneers were treated with silane and cemented and porcelain was applied using the pressing with C&B Metabond (Parkell, Farmingdale, N.Y.). method (SNF Press Ceram, Swiss NF) and finished Occlusion was verified, and oral hygiene instruc- (Fig. 5). This porcelain-fused-to-metal frame was tions were given (Figs. 8–10). tried in, the fit was assessed, and the ceramic por- tion was etched with hydrofluoric acid (Pulpdent Discussion Corp, Watertown, Mass.). The region of tooth 11 was anesthetized, and This report has described use of a natural tooth the crown and root were extracted atraumatically; pontic in an esthetically demanding area. Using good hemostasis was achieved (Fig. 6). The crown the natural tooth maintains the overall esthetics portion was swabbed with 100% ethanol, and a and makes it simpler to ensure the ideal contour composite resin plug was bonded to the underside and shade. However, there is some concern about of the crown to seal the internal chamber of the the longevity of the shade. Hydration of this type crown. The lingual surface of the crown (lingual of pontic is no different than for an endodontic- ceramic ) was then etched with hydrofluoric ally treated tooth, and as such the colour should acid for 5 minutes. The etched porcelain-fused-to- not change dramatically (Fig. 11). In the case de- metal frame was then silanated, as was the crown, scribed here, the design of the previous restoration

704 JCDA��� •  www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • ––––––– Point of Care –––––

Figure 9: Occlusal view of the pros- Figure 10: Anterior periapical radiograph Figure 11: Follow-up photograph of the thesis in place. showing the restoration in place. region 12 months after treatment, showing excellent healing and colour stability.

made it difficult to achieve an esthetically pleasing capacity for chemical and mechanical bonding to result, and use of the extracted crown solved many the alloy. potential esthetic problems. When the tooth was In conclusion, it is possible to use extracted extracted, the crown was shaped to create an ovate teeth as pontics for either short-term or long- pontic and thus maintain gingival esthetics. Since term restorations. Key elements are the addition both abutment teeth were periodontally sound, a of a metal supporting component, adequate tooth preparation and bonding of all materials to each fixed restoration was considered ideal. a In this case, a metal-based supporting struc- other under isolated conditions (rubber dam).

ture strengthened the prosthesis and allowed for a longer-term restoration. The patient was also THE AUTHOR interested in minimizing the amount of metal that was visible once the restoration was positioned. Dr. Izchak Barzilay is head of the division of prostho- dontics and restorative dentistry, Mount Sinai This was accomplished by laminating the metal Hospital, and assistant professor, faculty of dentistry, with porcelain using a pressing system to develop University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. He also main- tains a private practice (Prosthodontic Associates) an accurate contour. A nonprecious metal was limited to prosthodontics and implant dentistry in used because of its strength in thin section and the Toronto. Email: [email protected].

���JCDA • www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • October 2007, Vol. 73, No. 8 • 705