1Of 2 Voters' Pamphlet State Measures
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
											
Allen Hamoud Alley (DOB: --/--/54) Born In: Kalamazoo, Michigan Married To: Deborah Justice Alley (Aka: Debbie; DOB: 8-24-57) (Occupation: Pres
Allen Hamoud Alley (DOB: --/--/54) Born in: Kalamazoo, Michigan Married to: Deborah Justice Alley (aka: Debbie; DOB: 8-24-57) (Occupation: Pres. @ The Terrace Homeowner’s Assoc.) married 1982 Children: Paige Alley and A.J. Alley and Jenna C. Alley Residence: 1003 Terrace Drive, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 (est mkt value: $2.29 mil) Associated Addresses: Friends of Allen Alley, 494 State St. #230, Salem 97301; PAC Treasurer Donna L Butler (@capitolaccounting.com), PO Box 1304, Silverton 97381 (interestingly enough, same association as the FreedomWorks Issues PAC); Allen H. Alley, 333 S. State St. #V-216, Lake Oswego 97034; Allen Alley’s 2008 bid for State Treasurer lists campaign address: 355 N. State St., Lake Oswego 97034 Occupation: Private investor, “self employed” Add’l persons assoc. w/PAC: Brenda L. Collette, PO Box 1304, Silverton 97381 (@capitolaccounting.com) Registered Biz: West Bay Condominium, LLC (in partnership with Euro Homes, Inc.); The Terrace Homeowner’s Assoc., Inc.; Facebook page: personal page and campaign page From here: “As I walked along the charred remains of what once was a forest. I couldn't help but think about a recent faith healing case in Portland. A man was convicted and sent to jail for using faith healing with his sick daughter and not using modern medical techniques to help her. I got me thinking. Are we using the faith healing equivalent on our forests? Shouldn't we consider using modern forestry practice to help bring the forest back? Couldn't we replant a forest that would be more disease resistant, provide better habitat and be less fire prone? The catastrophic release of CO2 the first time was bad enough. - 
											
2002 SENATE RACES 34 Senate Races 20 Republican
2002 SENATE RACES 34 Senate Races 20 Republican-held Seats --14 Democrat-held Seats 6 Open Seats (NH, NJ NC, SC, TN, TX) – 5 currently Republican-held, 1 Democrat-held Current Senate Breakdown: 50 (D), 49 (R), 1 Independent (Votes With Democrats) PARTY STATE NOW DEMOCRAT REPUBLICAN SEN. JEFF ALABAMA R Susan Parker SESSIONS ALASKA R Frank Vondersaar SEN. TED STEVENS ARKANSAS SEN. TIM R AG Mark Pryor HUTCHINSON COLORADO SEN. WAYNE R Tom Strickland ALLARD DELAWARE D SEN. JOSEPH BIDEN Ray Clatworthy GEORGIA D SEN. MAX CLELAND Rep.Saxby Chambliss IDAHO R Alan Blinken SEN. LARRY CRAIG ILLINOIS SEN. RICHARD D DURBIN Jim Durkin IOWA* D SEN. TOM HARKIN U.S. Rep. Greg Ganske KANSAS R No Democratic Candidate SEN. PAT ROBERTS KENTUCKY SEN. MITCH R Lois Combs Weinberg MCCONNELL LOUISIANA** SEN. MARY D LANDRIEU Three GOP Candidates MAINE SEN. SUSAN R Chellie Pingree COLLINS MASSACHUSETTS No Republican D SEN. JOHN KERRY Candidate MICHIGAN D SEN. CARL LEVIN Andrew Raczkowski MINNESOTA*** SEN. PAUL D WELLSTONE Norm Coleman MISSISSIPPI SEN. THAD R No Democratic Candidate COCHRAN MISSOURI SEN. JEAN D CARNAHAN Jim Talent MONTANA No Republican D SEN. MAX BAUCUS Candidate NEBRASKA SEN. CHUCK R Charles Matulka HAGEL NEW HAMPSHIRE R Gov. Jeanne Shaheen U.S. Rep. John Sununu NEW JERSEY Fmr. Sen. Frank D Lautenberg Douglas Forrester NEW MEXICO SEN. PETE R Gloria Tristani DOMENICI NORTH CAROLINA R Erskine Bowles Elizabeth Dole OKLAHOMA SEN. JAMES R David Walters INHOFE OREGON**** SEN. GORDON R Bill Bradbury SMITH RHODE ISLAND D SEN. JACK REED Bob Tingle SOUTH CAROLINA R Alex Sanders Rep. - 
												
												Anes Mergedfile 1992To1997 A
anes_mergedfile_1992to1997_appendix_codebook.txt APPENDICES >> Study Design, Content, and Administration 1992 PRE-POST STUDY DESIGN The 1992 National Election Study entailed both a pre-election interview and a post-election re-interview. Approximately half of the 1992 cases are comprised of empaneled respondents who were first interviewed in the 1990 National Election Study and later in the 1991 Political Consequences of War Study. The other half of the cases are a freshly drawn cross-section sample. (Details of the sample design are given in "Sample Design of the 1992 Pre- and Post-Election Study", below.) The panel component of the study design provides an opportunity to trace how the changing fortunes of the Bush presidency, from the high levels of approval at the start of the Gulf War, through the decline after the onset of a recession, affected voting in the November 1992 presidential election. It also permits analysts to investigate the origins of the Clinton and Perot coalitions as well as changes in the public's political preferences over the two years preceding the 1992 election. Altogether, 2485 citizens were interviewed in the 9 weeks prior to the November 3, 1992 election. [Note: The original study Staff release of the 1992 National Election Study in April, 1993 contained 2,487 cases. See the note on "A Note on Deletion of Cases", below, for further information about the two cases deleted from this edition of the collection.] To permit analysis of the impact of the unfolding election campaign, a random half of the sample was released to the field on September 1 and the other half on October 1st. - 
												
												October 16,2002 Lawrence H. Norton, Esq. General Counsel 999 E
October 16,2002 Yon- Lawrence H. Norton, Esq. General Counsel Federal Election Commission I 999 E Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20463 RE: FEC Violation Complaint - U.S. Senator Gordon Smith (R-OR) 5 j Dear Mr. Norton: ! This complaint asserts that Sen. Gordon Smith’s 1996 campaign committee, “Gordon Smith for U.S. Senate Committee, Inc. (96)” (hereinafter “the Smith campaign”) violated several provlsions of the Federal Election Campaign Act (the “Act”), including but not limited to, 2 U.S.C. 43 1 et sea., and related regulations of the Federal Election Commission (“FEC or the “Commission”), specifically 11 C.F.R. -100.1 et seq. As the following facts and attached documentation make clear, the Smith campaign has broken the law andor vlolated FEC regulations in two ways: 1. The Smith campaign improperlv disclosed a mortpape as C6personalfunds” on its FEC filings. ._I As the facts below will demonstrate, the Smith campaign has improperly reported a mortgage obtained by Gordon Smith (and his spouse, Sharon L. Smith, see pgh. 2 herein) to repay a campaign loan as “personal funds.” This failure to accurately report the mortgage Smith obtained in April 2000, and its misrepresentation of the repayment as “personal funds” is a direct violation of 11 CFR 102.7. On May 14,2002, the FEC sent correspondence to the Smth campaign stating that the campaign had not been reporting interest payments on the loans from both U.S. Bank and Gordon Smith to the Smith campaign. Each of these loans were being reported on the Smith campaign’s FEC reports as accruing interest at 8.09%. - 
												
												1Of 2 Voters' Pamphlet State Measures
1of 2 Voters’ Pamphlet State Measures Oregon General Election November 7, 2006 Bill Bradbury Oregon Secretary of State This Voters’ Pamphlet is provided for assistance in casting your vote by mail ballot. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION BILL BRADBURY JOHN LINDBACK DIRECTOR SECRETARY OF STATE 141 STATE CAPITOL PADDY J. MCGUIRE SALEM, OREGON 97310-0722 DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE (503) 986-1518 Dear fellow Oregonian, Every election, we get a chance to make our voices heard by voting. From the simplest local issue to determining our nation’s leaders, we have a chance to weigh in on the things that matter to us and to our future. I hope you’ll take the opportunity to have your say by voting on the ballot measures described in this booklet. One of the great things about our vote by mail system in Oregon is that we can take the time to read as extensively as we want about the issues we’re asked to vote on by November 7th. Oregon’s unique vote by mail process gives all of us the time to study the important issues facing voters without the pressure of a line of people behind us waiting to vote in a polling place. This pamphlet is unique too, in that it affords the opportunity for any Oregonian to share their views on these important issues with the rest of us. I urge you to use the time that vote by mail provides and the information that this pamphlet provides to make informed decisions on these issues that we face. - 
												
												Ridenbaugh Press
The Oregon Political Field Guide Map: From U.S. Census 2 The OREGON POLITICAL FIELD GUIDE Randy Stapilus RIDENBAUGH PRESS RIDENBAUGH PRESS Carlton, Oregon 3 Copyright © 2012 Ridenbaugh Press All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, without prior permission of the publisher. Composition and editing by Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. Cover design by Randy Stapilus. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: Stapilus, Randy The Oregon Political Field Guide Includes bibliographical references ISBN 978-0-9824668-2-7(softbound) 1. Oregon. 2. Politics 3. Geography 4. Government-Public Policy. I. Title. Printed in the United States of America. March 2012 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 4 Contents Introduction Federal President Senators U.S. Representatives State Governor Statewide officials Legislature Judiciary Counties Cities Beyond the Majors Reading 5 Introduction The Oregon Blue Book is a classic. For decades it has been one of the finest state references anywhere in the county, one of the most information-packed as well as slickly-produced. It's on my bookshelf (actually, most of the editions from the last few decades crowd my bookshelves), and it (they) get regularly used. But no book can or should try to be all things. As a state publication (and despite its source in the Secretary of State's office), it goes a little light on election results, probably an appropriate decision. Anyone who wants the details, especially as they move toward the microscopic, has to look elsewhere. - 
												
												Mentor Graphics Oral History Panel, 2013-03-22
Mentor Graphics Oral History Panel Session David Moffenbeier, Gerry Langeler, and Tom Bruggere Moderated by: Douglas Fairbairn Recorded: March 22, 2013 Wilsonville, Oregon CHM Reference number: X6788.2013 © 2013 Computer History Museum Mentor Graphics Oral History Panel Session David Moffenbeier, Gerard Langeler, and Tom Bruggere, March 22, 2013 Fairbairn: My name is Doug Fairbairn. I'm here interviewing the three founders of Mentor Graphics. We are at the Mentor Graphics studio and television video studio in Wilsonville, Oregon. It is March 22, 2013 and with us are Gerry Langeler, Tom Bruggere and David Moffenbeier. And they are going to give us the background on sort of their individual histories and then we are going to go into a sort of team discussion on the founding and rapid growth of Mentor Graphics in the 1980s and early 1990s. So maybe we'll just start on the left hand side and ask Dave to introduce himself and give us a little- your personal background and how did that lead up to the Mentor Graphics. Moffenbeier: I grew up in Portland Oregon and my first job was for a timber products company that was big in Oregon at the time. And I worked for the CFO, so I decided that career wise I wanted to be a CFO. In order to do that it helped to have an MBA and a CPA. So I applied to Harvard Business School and I got in where I met Gerry Langeler. We were in the same section together. After that I came back to Portland. Became a CPA with Peat Marwick.