Southeastern Theological Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southeastern Theological Review SOUTHEASTERN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW Vol. 6, No. 1 Summer 2015 Introduction to the Volume More than Just Torah: God’s Instruction STR Editor 1 in the Psalms David G. Firth 63 Revisiting Hab. 2:4 and its Place in the New Testament Eschatological Vision The Steward of God: Exploring the Role James A.E. Mulroney 3 and Function of Elders Jeremy Kimble 83 Introducing Christian Mission Today STR Interviews Dr. Michael Goheen 29 Book Reviews 113 Reading the Gospels Smithly: Thinking Upon and Loving the Gospels in Dialogue with James K.A. Smith’s Desiring the Kingdom and Imagining the Kingdom Jonathan T. Pennington 45 CONTENTS ARTICLES Introduction to the Volume ................................................................... 1 STR Editor Revisiting Hab. 2:4 and its Place in the New Testament Eschatological Vision ............................................................................... 3 James A.E. Mulroney Introducing Christian Mission Today .................................................29 STR Interviews Dr. Michael Goheen Reading the Gospels Smithly: Thinking Upon and Loving the Gospels in Dialogue with James K.A. Smith’s Desiring the Kingdom and Imagining the Kingdom .........................................................45 Jonathan T. Pennington More than Just Torah: God’s Instruction in the Psalms .................63 David G. Firth The Steward of God: Exploring the Role and Function of Elders ...................................................................................................83 Jeremy Kimble Book Reviews ....................................................................................... 113 BOOK REVIEWS Daniel I. Block. For the Glory of God: Recovering a Biblical Theology of Worship ............................................................................................... 113 Joshua Moon Haddon W. Robinson. Biblical Preaching: The Development and Delivery of Expository Messages ............................................................... 115 Josh D. Chatraw Robert Kimball Shinkoskey. The American Kings: Growth in Presidential Power from George Washington to Barack Obama ................ 117 James A. Patterson J.P. Moreland, Chad Meister, and Khaldoun Sweis, eds. Debating Christian Theism ...................................................................... 119 Allen Gehring Rainer Albertz, James D. Nogalski, and Jakob Wöhrle, eds. Perspectives on the Formation of the Book of the Twelve: Methodological Foundations, Redactional Processes, Historical Insights ............................ 122 Tracy McKenzie SOUTHEASTERN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW Kathryn Joyce. The Child Catchers: Rescue, Trafficking, and the New Gospel of Adoption .......................................................................... 124 Philip O. Hopkins Adonis Vidu. Atonement, Law, and Justice: The Cross in Historical and Cultural Contexts ............................................................................. 126 Matthew Y. Emerson Peter J. Morden. Communion with Christ and His People: The Spirituality of C. H. Spurgeon .......................................................... 129 Nathan A. Finn Tom Thatcher and Catrin H. Williams, eds. Engaging with C.H. Dodd on the Gospel of John: Sixty Years of Tradition and Interpretation ........................................................................................... 131 Francis M. Macatangay Aaron Menikoff. Politics and Piety: Baptist Social Reform in America, 1770-1860 .............................................................................. 134 Brent J. Aucoin Francis Watson. Gospel Writing: A Canonical Perspective ................... 136 Josh D. Chatraw J. V. Fesko. The Theology of the Westminster Standards: Historical Context and Theological Insights .............................................................. 138 Scott Culpepper Steve Wilkens and Don Thorsen, eds. Twelve Great Books that Changed the University, and Why Christians Should Care ...................... 141 Ken Keathley David R. Nienhuis and Robert W. Wall. Reading the Epistles of James, Peter, John & Jude as Scripture: The Shaping & Shape of a Canonical Corpus .................................................................................... 142 Matthew Y. Emerson Richard Bauckham, James R. Davila, Alexander Panayotov, eds. Old Testament Pseudepigrapha: More Noncanonical Scriptures Volume I ................................................................................................. 145 Christoph Stenschke STR 6/1 (Summer 2015) 1–2 Introduction to the Volume STR Editor Unlike many of the other “themed” editions of Southeastern Theo- logical Review, the current volume is occasional. We are delighted to have received high-quality essays, which have gone through the normal double-blind peer review process. The product, we hope, speaks for itself. As our readers will expect by now, this edition of STR is international and ecumenical in scope, and the essays coa- lesce around the major research interests that our journal aims to explore: theology (systematic, historical, moral, and applied), bibli- cal studies (Old and New Testaments and biblical theology), phi- losophy (philosophy of religion, philosophical theology, and apolo- getics and culture), and missiology (missions, evangelism, public square). In our first essay, James Mulroney explores the Greek of Hab 2:2–5, its meaning, and how it has been received in New Testament texts. This is a close piece of exegetical reasoning which gives in- sight on the messianic nature of the reception of Hab. 2:4. Mulro- ney does not believe that the verse is inherently “messianic” in the Hebrew or Greek, but it is rightly received as such, fitting to New Testament to theology and Christian hermeneutics in the light of Jesus. Our second essay is an interview with Michael Goheen on the publication of his new volume on missiology: Introducing Christian Mission Today. This is a rich work and the interview exposes the motivations, aims and distinctives of the volume (without giving too much away!). This is, by all counts, a landmark text in the field of missiology and worth the effort of sustained reflection from its readers. An essay by Jonathan Pennington follows Goheen’s interview. Pennington explores the connections between James K.A. Smith’s research in the Cultural Liturgies series and his own research on the Gospels in the New Testament. His is a constructive critique of Smith’s work and a fresh take on research into the Gospels. This 2 SOUTHEASTERN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW essay will, no doubt, serve as a window from which readers will see his future work on ethics and the Sermon on the Mount. David Firth draws attention to the place of God’s instruction in the Psalter. His work is detailed and helps to uncover the important, if underdeveloped, theme of God’s instruction for both the Psalter and biblical scholarship on the Psalter. He provides solid evidence that the theme of God’s instruction is not only present, but signifi- cant in the Psalter, and Firth goes further to outline particular func- tions that the theme serves in the theology of the Psalter. Firth shows that Torah in the Psalter is not a pharisaic legalism to the law. Rather, God’s instruction in the Psalter is good, formative, and engenders delight for God. Following Firth’s essay is that of Jeremy Kimble, who turns his attention to a topic that is exegetically contentious and pastorally relevant. His question centers upon how one understands the func- tion of “elders” or “pastors” in the New Testament. Kimble argues that the notion of “steward” needs to be brought to bear in the discussion, based on the New Testament evidence. He concludes: Since pastors are to give an account to their Master, they must be sure to work diligently in proclaiming God’s Word concerning the good news of Jesus Christ and in leading the congregation in applying that proclaimed Word and walking in the ways of God. With this kind of faithful pastoral minis- try God will be well pleased. So Kimble’s essay is at once deeply rooted in a close analysis of New Testament evidence, but it simultaneously addresses the place of pastors and pastoral ministry in the local church for today. The essays are followed, in normal order, by an international team of reviewers. It is our hope that the essays and reviews will be of benefit and enrichment to our readers. STR 6/1 (Summer 2015) 3–28 Revisiting Hab. 2:4 and its Place in the New Testament Eschatological Vision James A.E. Mulroney University of Edinburgh I. It is widely agreed that the Apostle Paul quoted Ambakoum1 2:4b in Rom 1:17b because it was a messianic text that supported the core thesis of his epistle: the righteous (one) shall live by faith, and not by works of the law. It has been argued that this central article—to live by faith—is then unpacked throughout the rest of the epistle as the author explains what this means in light of the coming of Christ. The apostle’s citation is often handled as if it were a proof-text, being lifted out of Ambakoum to suit the pur- pose of the epistle. Support for the messianic background comes from studies by Dodd and Strobel, which have asserted that, in the former, Paul was working out of a messianic interpretative tradition of the passage,2 and in the latter, the translator of Ambakoum in- troduced a messianic reference at Amb 2:3a.3 1 Ambakoum is here given as the title of the Old Greek (OG) transla- tion of the Hebrew book entitled Habakkuk by tradition. In this study, the abbreviation LXX refers to the OG translation of
Recommended publications
  • Being Is Double
    Being is double Jean-Luc Marion and John Milbank on God, being and analogy Nathan Edward Lyons B. A. (Adv.) (Hons.) This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Philosophy Australian Catholic University Graduate Research Office Locked Bag 4115 Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 1st March 2014 i ABSTRACT This thesis examines the contemporary dispute between philosopher Jean-Luc Marion and theologian John Milbank concerning the relation of God to being and the nature of theological analogy. I argue that Marion and Milbank begin from a shared opposition to Scotist univocity but tend in opposite directions in elaborating their constructive theologies. Marion takes an essentially Dionysian approach, emphasising the divine transcendence “beyond being” to such a degree as to produce an essentially equivocal account of theological analogy. Milbank, on the other hand, inspired particularly by Eckhart, affirms a strong version of the Thomist thesis that God is “being itself” and emphasises divine immanence to such a degree that the analogical distinction between created and uncreated being is virtually collapsed. Both thinkers claim fidelity to the premodern Christian theological tradition, but I show that certain difficulties attend both of their claims. I suggest that the decisive issue between them is the authority which should be granted to Heidegger’s account of being and I argue that it is Milbank’s vision of post-Heideggerian theological method which is to be preferred. I conclude that Marion and Milbank give two impressive contemporary answers to the ancient riddle of “double being” raised in the Anonymous Commentary on Plato’s “Parmenides,” a riddle which queries the relation between absolute First being and derived Second being.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Theology, Loyola University Maryland 4501 N
    FREDERICK CHRISTIAN BAUERSCHMIDT Department of Theology, Loyola University Maryland 4501 N. Charles St. Baltimore, Maryland 21210 USA tel.: (410) 617-2042 [email protected] Academic Positions • Professor of Theology, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 2013-present. • Chair, Department of Theology, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 2009-2015. • Associate Professor of Theology, Loyola College/University, Baltimore, MD, 2000-2013. • Director, Loyola International Nachbahr Huis, Leuven, Belgium, 2001-2003. • Visiting Professor, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 2001-2003. • Assistant Professor of Theology, Loyola College, Baltimore, MD, 1994-2000. • Lecturer in the Department of Religion, Duke University, Durham, NC, 1993. Education Ph.D. 1996 Duke University, Graduate Program in Religion. Major Field: Theology and Ethics. Minor Field: History of Christianity. External Minor Field: English. Dissertation: “Julian of Norwich and the Mystical Body Politic of Christ.” Co-directors: Stanley Hauerwas and Sarah Beckwith. M.A.R. 1989 Yale Divinity School. Concentration: Systematic Theology. B.A. 1984 The University of the South. Major: Religion. Publications Books Authored • How Beautiful the World Could Be: Christian Reflections on the Everyday. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishers (forthcoming 2022). • The Essential Summa Theologiae: A Reader and Commentary Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic (forthcoming October 2021). First edition: Holy Teaching: Introducing the Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas. 2005. 320 pp. • The Love That Is God: An Invitation to Christian Faith. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishers, 2020. xvii+152 pp. • The Deacon’s Ministry of the Liturgy. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2016. vii+124 pp. • Thomas Aquinas: Faith, Reason and Following Christ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. xii+342 pp. • Why the Mystics Matter Now.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays in Honor of Denys Turner
    DESIRE, FAITH, and the DARKNESS OF GOD Essays in Honor of Denys Turner Edited by ERIC BUGYIS and DAVID NEWHEISER Desire, Faith, and the Darkness of God DESIRE, FAITH, and the DARKNESS OF GOD Essays in Honor of Denys Turner Edited by ERIC BUGYIS and DAVID NEWHEISER University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 undpress.nd.edu Copyright © 2015 by the University of Notre Dame All Rights Reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Desire, faith, and the darkness of God : essays in honor of Denys Turner / edited by Eric Bugyis and David Newheiser. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-268-02242-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 0-268-02242-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-268-07598-9 (web pdf) 1. Christian theology. I. Turner, Denys, 1942– II. Bugyis, Eric, 1980– editor. BR118.D47 2015 230—dc23 2015031816 ∞ The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. to Denys the Teacher Contents Acknowledgments xi Preface xiii Eric Bugyis Introduction: The Trials of Desire 1 David Newheiser IMMANENCE AND TRANSCENDENCE ONE. End without End: Cosmology and Infinity in Nicholas of Cusa 13 Mary-Jane Rubenstein TWO. The Darkness of God and the Light of Life: Augustine, Pseudo-Denys, and Eckhart 37 Karl Hefty THREE. Mysterious Reasons: The Rationality and Ineffability of Divine Beauty 72 A. N. Williams FOUR. Using Reason to Derive Mutual Illumination from Diverse Traditions 93 David Burrell, C.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Muslims and Christians Worship the Same God: a Philosophical Approach
    Abilene Christian University Digital Commons @ ACU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations 8-2020 Do Muslims and Christians Worship the Same God: A Philosophical Approach Zachary W. Casey [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy of Language Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Casey, Zachary W., "Do Muslims and Christians Worship the Same God: A Philosophical Approach" (2020). Digital Commons @ ACU, Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 241. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ ACU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ ACU. ABSTRACT In this thesis I probe the question of whether Muslims and Christians worship the same God primarily through the discipline of philosophy of language. Though a multifaceted question at its core (e.g., theological, historical), the question directly ties into how language operates in relation to God. That is, the ways in which Muslims and Christians make predications of God have a significant role in delineating whether they worship the same God. By working from the perspective of predication, I argue that Muslims and Christians refer to but do not worship the same God. In this sense, Muslims and Christians refer to the same God with the use of generic predicates (e.g., God is good); however, they do not worship same God given that worship entails the use of specific predicates (e.g., God is Triune).
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Apophaticism and Virtues Ethics David M. Wilmington
    ABSTRACT A Pregnant Silence: Contemporary Apophaticism and Virtues Ethics David M. Wilmington, Ph.D. Director: Barry A. Harvey, Ph.D. This dissertation surveys and critiques the ethical consequences of the contemporary revival of apophaticism. It examines representative examples of a continuum of contemporary apophatic thought—primarily Jacques Derrida, John Caputo, Richard Kearney, Jean-Luc Marion, and Denys Turner—and assesses the ethical implications of the accounts themselves as well as the compatibility of their accounts with virtues ethics. It concludes with a study of Bonaventure and argues that his Christocentric Exemplarism allows him to harmonize the tensions between both the apophatic and cataphatic and between the relationship of apophaticism with virtues ethics. I suggest that the centrality of humility in Bonaventure’s thought offers rich resources for the contemporary theological reconsideration of metaphysics and ethics. A Pregnant Silence: Contemporary Apophaticism and Virtues Ethics by David M. Wilmington, B.A., M.T.S. A Dissertation Approved by the Department of Religion William H. Bellinger, Jr., Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved by the Dissertation Committee Barry A. Harvey, Ph.D., Chairperson Thomas S. Hibbs, Ph.D. Paul Martens, Ph.D. Accepted by the Graduate School August 2015 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School. Copyright © 2015 by David M. Wilmington All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................vi Dedication..........................................................................................................................vii Chapter One: Why Speak of Silence?: The Return to the Apophatic Tradition................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF with Clickable Content Links
    Durham E-Theses Relocating Richard Hooker - Theological Method and the Character of Anglicanism HOBDAY, PHILIP,PETER How to cite: HOBDAY, PHILIP,PETER (2021) Relocating Richard Hooker - Theological Method and the Character of Anglicanism, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13874/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Relocating Richard Hooker Theological Method and the Character of Anglicanism A dissertation submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Durham University Philip Peter Hobday Department of Theology and Religion January 2021 Relocating Richard Hooker Theological Method and the Character of Anglicanism Philip Peter Hobday Abstract The coherence of Anglicanism’s claim to be both ‘catholic’ and ‘reformed’ has often been challenged, with the tradition regularly characterised as more one than the other, or as steering a middle way between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith, Reason and the Existence of God Denys Turner Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521602564 - Faith, Reason and the Existence of God Denys Turner Frontmatter More information Faith, Reason and the Existence of God The proposition that the existence of God is demonstrable by rational argument is doubted by nearly all philosophical opinion today and is thought by most Christian theologians to be incompatible with Chris- tian faith. This book argues that, on the contrary, there are reasons of faith why in principle the existence of God should be thought ratio- nally demonstrable and that it is worthwhile revisiting the theology of Thomas Aquinas to see why this is so. The book further suggests that philosophical objections to proofs of God’s existence rely upon an atten- uated and impoverished conception of reason which theologians of all monotheistic traditions might wish to reject. Denys Turner proposes that on broader and deeper conception of it, human rationality is open to the ‘sacramental shape’ of creation as such and in its exercise of rational proof of God it in some way participates in that sacramentality of all things. is Norris-Hulse Professor of Divinity and Fellow of Peterhouse, University of Cambridge. He is the author of Marxism and Christianity (1983), Eros and Allegory (1995), The Darkness of God (1995) and Faith Seeking (2002). © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521602564 - Faith, Reason and the Existence of God Denys Turner Frontmatter More information Faith, Reason and the Existence of God Denys Turner University of Cambridge © Cambridge
    [Show full text]
  • The Summa Theologiae Edited by Philip Mccosker and Denys Turner Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87963-7 - The Cambridge Companion to: The Summa Theologiae Edited by Philip McCosker and Denys Turner Frontmatter More information The Cambridge Companion to THE SUMMA THEOLOGIAE Arguably the most infl uential work of theology in the history of Christianity, Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae has shaped all subsequent theology since it was written in the late thirteenth century. This Companion features essays from both specialists in Aquinas’ thought and from constructive contemporary theologians to demonstrate how to read the text effectively and how to relate it to past and current theological questions. The authors thoroughly examine individual topics addressed in the Summa , such as God, the Trinity, eternity, providence, virtue, grace, and the sacraments, mak- ing the text accessible to students of all levels. They further discuss the contextual, methodological, and structural issues surrounding the Summa , as well as its interaction with a variety of religious tradi- tions. This volume will not only allow readers to develop a compre- hensive multi-perspectival understanding of Aquinas’ main mature theological work but also promote dialogue about the vital role of the Summa in theology today. Philip McCosker is Director of the Von Hügel Institute and Fellow of St Edmund’s College, University of Cambridge, and Departmental Lecturer in Modern Theology, University of Oxford. He is the editor of What Is It that the Scripture Says? (2006) and author of Christ the Paradox: Expanding Ressourcement Theology (2017). He is also the editor of the journal Reviews in Religion and Theology . Den ys Tur ner is Horace Tracy Pitkin Professor Emeritus of Historical Theology at Yale University.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Theology in the University Denys Turner
    FIELDS OF FAITH How will the study of theology and the religions in higher education be shaped in the coming century? This book offers several different perspectives on this field of study with suggestions for a future in which theology and religious studies are pursued together. There are exam- ples of the interplay of theology and religious studies with reference to a range of topics: God, love, scripture, worship, argument, recon- ciliation, friendship and justice. The contributors practise different disciplines within the field, often in combination, covering theology, philosophy, history, phenomenology, literary studies, hermeneutics, politics, ethics and law. Their specialisms embrace Judaism, Chris- tianity, Islam and Indian religions, with particular focus on the field in Europe, the US and South Africa. Recognising the significance of the religions and of higher education, the book explores what best practice can be adopted to fulfil responsibilities towards academic disciplines, the religions and the societies of which they are part. FIELDS OF FAITH Theology and Religious Studies for the Twenty-First Century edited by DAVID F. FORD, BEN QUASH AND JANET MARTIN SOSKICE Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge ,UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridg e.org /9780521847377 © David F. Ford, Ben Quash, Janet Martin Soskice 2005 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND the FILIOQUE DISPUTES? Re-Assessing the Radical Equality of the Spirit Through the Ascetic and Mystical Tradition
    THE DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY TENTH ANNUAL HOLY SPIRIT LECTURE BEYOND THE FILIOQUE DISPUTES? Re-assessing the Radical Equality of the Spirit through the Ascetic and Mystical Tradition November 11, 2016 Power Center Ballroom Pittsburgh, PA FEATURING SPECIAL GUEST Sarah Coakley Norris-Hulse Professor of Divinity at the University of Cambridge 2 THE SPIRIT IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM: “The Spirit in the New Millennium: The Duquesne University Annual Holy Spirit Lecture and Colloquium” was initiated in 2005 in fulfillment of Duquesne University's mission and charism. As a university founded by the Congregation of the Holy Spirit, it is hoped that this ongoing series of lectures and colloquia will encourage and promote significant as well as diverse scholarship on the theology of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, besides fostering scholarship on the Holy Spirit within an ecumenical context, this event is intended to heighten awareness of how pneumatology (the study of the Spirit) might be relevantly integrated into the various academic disciplines in general. Past lectures, as well as the present text, may be accessed online at www. duq.edu/holyspirit. You can contact us at [email protected]. Radu Bordeianu, Ph.D., served as the director of Holy Spirit Lecture and Colloquium, 2016. 2 1 2016 Colloquists • Dr. Radu Bordeianu Associate Professor of Theology, Duquesne University • Dr. Elizabeth Agnew-Cochran Associate Professor of Theology, Duquesne University • Dr. Eric Dart Assistant Professor of Theology, Gannon University • Dr. Mary Catherine Hilkert, O.P. Professor of Systematic Theology, University of Notre Dame • Dr. Eugene F. Rogers Jr. Professor of Religious Studies and Women’s and Gender Studies, University of North Carolina in Greensboro • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Dualism of Creature and Creator a Hindu-Christian
    Beyond the Dualism of Creature and Creator A Hindu-Christian Theological Inquiry into the Distinctive Relation between the World and God Daniel John Soars Faculty of Divinity University of Cambridge This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Clare College August 2019 Preface This thesis is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my thesis has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee. The text is 79,995 words long including footnotes but excluding bibliography. i Daniel John Soars, Clare College Beyond the Dualism of Creature and Creator: A Hindu-Christian Theological Inquiry into the Distinctive Relation between the World and God SUMMARY This thesis is one particular way of clarifying how the God Christians believe in is to be understood. The key conceptual argument which runs throughout the thesis is that the distinctive relation between the world and God in Christian theology is best understood as a non-dualistic one.
    [Show full text]
  • Fields of Faith: Theology and Religious Studies for the Twenty-First Century Edited by David F
    Cambridge University Press 0521847370 - Fields of Faith: Theology and Religious Studies for the Twenty-First Century Edited by David F. Ford, Ben Quash and Janet Martin Soskice Frontmatter More information FIELDS OF FAITH How will the study of theology and the religions in higher education be shaped in the coming century? This bookoffers several different perspectives on this field of study with suggestions for a future in which theology and religious studies are pursued together. There are exam- ples of the interplay of theology and religious studies with reference to a range of topics: God, love, scripture, worship, argument, recon- ciliation, friendship and justice. The contributors practise different disciplines within the field, often in combination, covering theology, philosophy, history, phenomenology, literary studies, hermeneutics, politics, ethics and law. Their specialisms embrace Judaism, Chris- tianity, Islam and Indian religions, with particular focus on the field in Europe, the US and South Africa. Recognising the significance of the religions and of higher education, the bookexplores what best practice can be adopted to fulfil responsibilities towards academic disciplines, the religions and the societies of which they are part. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521847370 - Fields of Faith: Theology and Religious Studies for the Twenty-First Century Edited by David F. Ford, Ben Quash and Janet Martin Soskice Frontmatter More information FIELDS OF FAITH Theology and Religious Studies for the Twenty-First Century edited by DAVID F. FORD, BEN QUASH AND JANET MARTIN SOSKICE © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521847370 - Fields of Faith: Theology and Religious Studies for the Twenty-First Century Edited by David F.
    [Show full text]