<<

provide

The

its

defining

strategists.

In

metabolism

adapted

sensitive

in

extreme

are

are

conditions

characterized

communities

application

on

Microorganisms

Introduction

of

environments

environment.

environment

The

achieve

strategies. variable

environmental

microbial

growth

position

In

ecological

general

Guus

Environmental

of

Characterization plate

plate

Microbial

DNA

adapted

in

the

order

relative

general

an

16S

to

the

human

r-strategist

count

for

encoding

Roeselers

faster

In crowded

they rates

ecological

where

is

environment

to

rRNA

on

to

count

Diversity

of populations

order

toxins

It more

studies

within

by

rRNA

characterize

crowded,

method an

abundance

more

have

was

a

is

body

pressure doubling

on

might Biotechnology

can

their

The

resource

culture-independent

r/K-gradient

to

assumed

efficient.

environments for

microbes

agar

in

quantitated

a

highly

be Course

characterize

stable

fingerprint

it

tendency and

less

methods

the

the

genes

amount

as

may

found

resource

since

reflect

(Caidwell

plates

has

described times

availability

ubiquitous

environment

efficient

extreme

of

and

2004

divergent

than

copy

that

be

are

an

in rRNA been

Group, of

to

than

compare

to

interesting

the

of

active was

of that

adapted

limiting

r-environments

by

the

a

multiple

numbers

select

et

determine

aquatic

complex

bacterial

cell

compared

by

most

environments

real-time

16S

have those

al.,

encoding

and

is

determined. Deift

environments

single

stability

De microbial

molecular

metabolism. not

(De

for

1997).

to

conditions diverse

complex

rRNA

reached

Leij

with

University

to

uncrowded,

copies limiting

microbial organisms

copy

leij

communities Real-time

in

PCR

the

determine

with

et

genes

just

bacterial

bacterial

et and

environments

community

(Andrews

genes

al.

gene

approach

their distribution

aquatic

like

of

al.,

The

and

(r-environments)

is

(K-environments).

a

one

They

(1993)

of

in

rRNA community

molececular

resource

described.

that

RNase

carrying

hot

Technology, 1993).

nutrient

compared

or

the traditional

present

the

from are

microbial

species

grow

two.

and

has

springs.

will

to

metagenome

distribution

genes

quantitative

also

P.

including

K-strategists

communities

of

characterize

been

rich

soil,

capacity Harris,

develop

fast

Environments

availability

one

r-

in

thought

with

with

the

approach

enable

environments

rhizosphere In

or

or

demonstrated

method under

communities

diverse

could

K-environments

Netherlands

organisms

1986).

K-strategists

this the

soil,

and

according

different

of

of

to

uncrowded

proportion bacteria

start

are

r-

their microbial air,

study

be

a

based

based

Hence,

aquatic

in

or

specific

can

more

more in

with

and

cell

and

K- that

PCR

that to

and

to

their

the

be

life

on

by

on

to in

the

samples

Three

Sample

Materials

number

was

extracted

observations.

The

the

The

sample.

(WWTF),

The

of

In

community

gDNA

availability

(Venter

resource

If

al.

slower

constitutive

could

the

Kiappenbach

growth

significance

doubling

It

analyzed

of

surface copies 1996).

Gene

culturable

nonculturability

2000).

distribution

genomic seawater

this

rRNA

single

compared

1998,

relative

is

results total

Clostridiurn

sampling

capability

were

study

assumed

species.

collection

provide

amounts

growing redundancy

et

of

from

gDNA

Operon availability,

rates

water

Klappenbach

operon

copy

However,

a

&

have

times

a!.,

DNA

the

on

obtained

amount collected

in

environments

because

surface

the

The

Methods expression

of

by

three

sites

of et

an

that

Ribosomal 2004)

but

gene

of

of

either an

relative was

that

or

cells

than

al. the paradoxum

amounts

copy from

colony

r/K-gradient. real-time

numbers

an

bacteria

of

advantage

environment.

a

were rather

of

bacterial (2000)

is

they

water

extracted

seven

ubiquitous

multiple

with

this with

the

aerated

of

those (K-strategists)

many one

diverse not

numbers

1

et

6S

abundance

a

of

emergence

relative selected

al.

are

of

or

a

method

RNA

to

specific common

(Verschuere

this

sample rDNA

observed to

PCR rRNA up

multiple

with

portable

2000).

bacteria.

two

16S in

lagoon

species

allow

revealed

from aquatic respond

under

copies

to

general

molecular

reflect

operon.

single

just

with

abundance .

rRNA

Comparison

to

was

P

7

operons

from of environment

requires

a

in

represent

(RNase due a

after

peristaltic are

of

that

rRNA

fluctuating

one

water with

environments

Especially l6S

of

a

compared

rapid

bacterial

to

the

highly

the

the copy

and

et

mix

Sequence

to

commonly

a

the

rRNA

or

plating

resource

rRNA

relatively

approach

ecological

in

municipal al.,

stratified

the

presence

sample

genes RNase

of

two.

P)

gene respond

number growth

of

E.

adapted

diverse

of

pump

rRNA

overproduction

1997).

(Brown

gDNA

genomes,

might genes

coli

with encoding

conditions

the

r-strategists

Condon

on

allows

analysis

would

from

P

availability.

was

found,

high

of

total

solid

were lake

(Geopump TM ,

is

of

genes

encoding

and waste

the

aquatic

strategy to

to

This

reflect

enable

extracted

not

rRNA

et 15

assessed

a

a

fluctuating

the

amount

confer

rDNA

et

and,

rDNA

waste

yet

DNA

medium

very

a!. can

compared

rRNA

of

present

so

water

method

but

(r-environments),

al.

positioning

the

environments.

1996,

they

are

the

of of

operon

much bacteria

genes

a

hence

specific

(1995)

Multiple

among

water -40%

operon

by

a amounts

ribosomes

marine

bacteria

cloned

from

of

operons treatment

more

stability

Geotech

metabolic in

often

(Salvesen

real-time

Hsieh

DNA

is

to

in growth

the with

copies

treatment

be

suggested

three

based

of the

environment.

to

the

support

likely

copy

16S

water contain

mixed

of

rRNA

in

with limited

encoding

the

et

achieve (Rainey

and

total

plate

metagenome

Inc.)

(Fegatella facility

a

Two response

is low

rRNA

a!.

PCR.

conditions.

&

burden

on

numbers

microbial

organisms

to

while

related

resource

the

column

maximal

amount

gDNA

facility

2004).

Vadstein,

operons

from

count

multiple

that

the

copy

liter be

by

total

faster

et

in

genes

for

non

the

time

on the

to

a!.,

et

the to

aeruginosa American

numbers Chromobacterium

rrndb

Ribosomal

Bacterial

Bacterial

Fig.1.

processed

All

Buzzards

Falmouth

is

Cape

samples

an

strains

strains

among Cod,

Type RNA

internet

bay,

within

PAO1, (Massachusetts,

MA,

were Operon

Culture with

an

violaceum

prokaryotes

accessible

6

USA,

inlet

was

hours

collected

varying

Copy

with

of

kindly

Collection

after

Bergonzini

the

USA),

database

the

Number

rRNA

collection.

between Atlantic

(Kiappenbach

location

provided Siders that

(ATCC) operon

Database

and

of

Ocean

June

Pond,

the

contains

Eschericia

by

three

copy

and

Jean

in

(http://www.atcc.org).

a

(rrndb)

et

small

sampling

southeastern

information

July

numbers

a!.,

Huang

coil

coastal

(http://rrnd.cme.msu.edu).

2004.

2001).

sites.

Ki

(California

were

2

salt

Massachusetts

on

were

All

Vibrio

rRNA

pond

selected

water

ordered

Pseudomonas

in

operon

Institute

natriegens,

samples

Falmouth,

from

from

(Figure

copy

The

the

the

of

were

and 1).

at

Bacto

Water plated

was

Dilution

Plate

final

soil

Tube.

The

A

manufacturers

transferred

followed

cell

using

(2003).

(Millipore).

(Whatman

Water

DNA

Table.

Lactobacillus

room

50

Schmidt

Technology,

State

1

Chromobacterium

Vibrio

Escherichia

plated

extraction

Sphingonionas

lysis

ml

Pseudornonas

pellet

concentration

ml

buffer

tryptone,

aerugmosa

count

alaskensis

extraction

DNA

out the

Complete

violaceum

Organism

1.

temperature University,

samples

sample

The

cultures.

series

Bacterial

natriegens

solution,

by

UltraClean

on

out

(Michigan

was

to

International)

(40mM

extraction

assay

filters

DNA

15

R2A

brevis

1.5

on

protocol.

kit,

coli

were

3

USA),

of

resuspended

mm

g

(SWC)

of

solid

ml

strains

each

MoBio).

of 60

was

Agar

were

USA)

500

EDTA,

for

of

made

sterile

2.5

Soil

State

pi

Designation

Lactobacillus

Bergonzini

agar

was

vortexing

extracted

RB2256

overnight

six

with

extract,

of transferred

PAOI

plates

medium

ng/pl. ml

K-12

and

DNA

and

from -

University, Si

-

completed

All

Eppendorf

days.

plates.

50

variable

were

in

Sphingomonas

solution

subsequently

DNA mM

(Difco)

Isolation

3

550

each

from

Each at

plates

culture

ml

pre-filtered

The

to

maximal

rRNA

rRNA

Tris

p1

brevis

glycerol,

extracts

pre-filtered

tube.

according a

USA).

the

and

day

WWTF

the

2

of 4

13

1 7

8

50

(750

[pH

Kit

was

operon

c.n.

biomass

cell

200

Buzzard

ml

colonies

was

DNA

(MoBio)

alaskenis

filtered

speed.

8.2]).

(Table.1)

used

ml

centrifuged

20

sterile

through

sample

lysis

jil

ATCC#

baa-47

copy

kindly

10798

to

8290

12472

14048

agar,;

water

seawater,

extraction of

-

for

accumulated

One

manufacturers

The

Bay

that

IRS

solution

through

plastic

numbers

as

Real-Time

was

and

All

[pH

sample.

provided

M.R.S.

R2B

a

portion

(LB)

(LB)

Luria-Bertani

marine

described

resulting

were

sample

solution

for

11

strains

the

kindly

250

7.0]).

was

tube

medium

jim

(c.n.).

and

1 a

visible

Siders

broth

broth,

mm

0.2

of

ml

100

on

completed

was

glass

together

Medium

PCR

by

were

were

Plates

slurry provided

transferred

protocol

by

lysis

the

distilled

_m

at

(Difco)

p1

broth ATCC

Craig

Pond

plated

Stepanauskas

were

maximum

were

microfibre

added grown

membrane

of

beads,

membrane

were

(450

with

(LB)

each

sample

marked

(Ultra 2216

by Oberg

according

diluted

out

water,

incubated to

to

p1

overnight

Thomas

4

550

1.5

dilution

the

on

of)

a

speed.

25

Clean

25

32°C

32

32

were 25

filters

filters

(Weber

Bead

ml

jil

and

et

filter

Sea

tube

5 to

was

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

T

al.

g

to

of

of

a

M. in

Bpi-F

DI6S-R

3pi-R

)16S-F

rimer

Table

curve

The

determine

30

for

Bpi-R

distilled

(50 H 2 0,

Lactobacillus

extracted

violaceum

copy extracted

The

16S

Real-time

plotted

different

culture

curve

Three

Growth

hours

percentage

enumeration.

enumeration. enumerated.

sec

2

pmol/il)

DNA

2.

7300

mm,

rRNA

for

12.5

number

(50

Primers

analysis.

and

were

against

strains

Ribonuclease

Ribonuclease

Bacterial

Bacterial

Target

H 2 0,

of

both

time

the from

curves

DNA

95°C

from

pmol/il)

Real

i1

and

72°C

Vibrio

quantitative

defined

and

of

(Table

IQ

melting

primer

used

points

time

brevis.

12.5 with

mix

Escherichia

Pseudoinonas

Plates

the

Time

for The

The

Vibrio

from

When

SYBR

16S

6S

for

RNase

natriegen,

in

in

total

10

tl

(Table

consisted

a

2),

P

with

P

rDNA

optical

rDNA as

number

this

45

a

pairs.

PCR

diverse

point

high

The

mm

IQ graph

that

natriegens

fast

2.5

plates

Green

sec.

study.

count

a

P

SYBR

PCR

Bacterial

2),

copy

followed

Smartspec

System

of

l’

growers.

density

coli

contained

genes

(Figure

Escherichia

5’

5’ The

5’

5’

Sequence

of

16S

the aeruginosa

DNA.

3.5

of

mix

after became

taagccggrttctgt

gaggaaagtcciigc

ggwtaccttgttacgactt

cggtgaatacgttcycgg

K12.

number

visible

Green

the

program

formed

il rRNA

in

in (Applied

2).

(Biorad),

of

by

six

DNA.

16S

The

different

plus

gDNA

the

The

the

between

40

coli

mix

days.

too

colonies

species

operon

amplification

double RNase

photospectrometer

culture

PAO1,

environmental

low

cycles

was

The

and

Biosystems)

0.2

(Biorad),

3’

crowded,

from

3’

The

dilutions

copy

followed

following

Sphingomonas

copy

P

il and

stranded

3’

3’

1

at

Sphingomonas

consisting

counted

amplification

colonies

DI6S-F Vibrio

and

600

number

low

number

0.2

mixture

was

a

nm

Brown

Brown

Marcelino

Marcelino

250

Reference

was

by

copy

DNA

program

samples

higher

natriegens,

pi

(Biorad).

each

that

(0D 600 )

(50

of

used

a

mix

Bpi-F

colonies

used

were

melting

alaskensis

eta!.,

et

number

94°C

products.

pmol/jil),

contained

became

mixture

al.,

alaskensis day

consisted

to

et

et

dilution

to

was

and

subjected

The

a!.,

(50

al., in

1996

establish

1996

for

enumerate

was

Chrornobacteriuni

I

curve

species.

2000

2000 were

performed:

pmol/Il),

30

0D 60 °

in

ml

was

visible

contained

0.2

11

expressed

sec,

the

of

was

of

RB2256

determined

analysis

selected

jil

tl

a

to

the

values

a

S

mixes

standard

52°C

The

within

D16S-R

bacterial

distilled

a

used

100

gDNA

0.2

growth

11

50°C

high

were

and

pure

for

as

to

111

tl

of

for

for

48

at a

per Table.

period

Fig. order

The three

sample

calculating

The

ml

P’ate

-D

Results

ci

ci

0

0

ci

2. 20

30 10

water

40

3.

50

100

604

801

90

of

Plate

numbers

total

tested

to

Total Buzzards

T

six

count Siders

Sample

to

compare

sample. WWTF

days.

count

number

1000111

1 counts

the samples

Pond

assay

of

site

Bay

assay.

total

visible

the

-—Buzzard

—h—

obtained

undiluted

of

was

different

number

Proportions colony

2 Siders

colonies

huge

after

ponl

sample.

forming

of

environments

(Table

6

(%)

days

colonies

3

counted time

of

The

of

3).

units

(days)

the

cfu

incubation difference

after

each

1724185

total

Iml

(cfti)

1110

253

4

(Figure

water

number

day

6

per

days

expressed

were

in

2).

ml

numbers

of

of

5

water

visible transformed

incubation

in

colony

sample

of

colonies

cfu

6

forming

from

into

per

was

medium

appearing SWC

R2B

R2B

ml

percentages

determined

100 units

6 between

tl

over

(cfu)

diluted

a

the

by in

limited

Since availability in

stable

are

microorganisms

When

Discussion

specificity extractions

No and

Real-time

Fig.

the

E. the

The growth

Growth

remarkable.

results

0

“C

3.

coli(8

RNase

the

and

growth

WWTF

0.2 it

one 0.4 0.6

0.8

Growth

growth

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0

is

marine

rate

0

nutrient copies)

would

of

is

were

assumed

curves

PCR

and

rate

very

the

P

of

rates

curves

sample.

Since

as

encoding

Vibrio

obtained

primer

of

the

water

expect

was

high, rich

r-

derived

Sphingomonas

5

for

that

or

establishment

in

r-strategists

environments,

natriegens,

The

K-strategists, hence

Vibrio

between

column

sets

this

doubling

from

from

DNA

conditions

and

environment

natriegens,

10

one the

the (Figure

offers

nonoptimal

alaskensi,

which

within

would

are

real-time

times

0D 600

of

11

it

then

defined

3).

a in

is

contains

a

Escherichia

15

expect

very

measurements

surprising

on

to the

waste

the

standard

which

be

PCR

PCR

their

results

gDNA

stable

as

more

this

13 water contains

fast programme

assays.

20

own

rRNA

coli

to

curve

environment

K-selective.

obtained

environment

growing

mixes

find

were

are

and

are operon

S.

V.

The

only

failed, Sphingomonas

relatively fluctuating

alaskens

valid

natriegen

very

25

conditions.

and

from

Quantitation

one

organisms

copies,

different

to

parameters

operon.

probably

environmental

where

the

be

more

and

more

30 was

plate

alaskensis

for

The

adapted

resources

slow

much

the of

each count r-selective.

due

to

growth

16S

7

resource

growers

identify

higher

strain.

to

to

rRNA

assay

DNA

are low

rate

les

than

The of

Bacteriol multiplicity

Condon vol.

communities

Caidwell

93:3001-3006

microbial

Comparative

Brown

References

Environmental

me

experience

I

Acknowledgements

copy

amount

It PicoGreen

be normalized

highly to

Considering

evaluate

Although

the often

would

Venter

rate The

growth. that

nutrient

should

information

However,

should

the

15.

be

accurate

species

gene

and

growth

this

Plenum

opportunity

optimized overestimated

like

J.W.,

C., recommendable.

177:4152-4156

of

et

populations

D.E., be

this

be

rRNA

of richness

environment

would

in this

al the

(Turner

1

Liveris

transcend for

6S

exploring diversity

considered

noticed

it

Biotechnology

(2004) curve Escherichia analysis

the

enough.

Nolan method

Press,

about complete

study

must

rRNA

each

Wolfaardt

operon

Real-time

be

in

to

of

D.,

BioSystems) assay

order

learn

favorable.

obtained

New was J.M., sample,

due nutrient

that

this

the

be

in

in reveals

genes Darwinism?

Instead

of

Squires

staff is

copy that

seawater

further

deepest

to noted The

unable seems

so

environment. relatively

coli

ribonuclease

the

York, to

group

Haas

G.M.,

PCR

the

of

the

much.

within numbers

apply

although

that

tertiary

total availability

and

high

the

the

C.,

varying

detail

that

genome to

and

in

would

deliver

105-191

assay

E.S.,

samples

MBL

the

confirm Korber

I the

DeIft

Schwartz

amount

fluorometer

In:

this

poor

the total

darkest

also

by

when

in

structural

(Klappenbach

physiological DNA

Jones it’s number

be

Microbial

Rubio

The

total

for

the

method.

future P

would size

transforming

or

cfu

collected

in a obvious

D.R., again making RNA

outskirts

methods

of

proof

that

more low

quantitation

gDNA.

I. of

the

JW

count

extracted

research.

M.A.,

like

and,

of

the

other

elements.

counts

method

Diversity

that

Assessment

environment

(Ed)

using

Lawrence suitable

of

copies

it

to

that organisms

of from

possible

Squires principle,

on relying

et

Therefore,

implications

there

thank

Major

microbiology conditions

Advances

the

al.,

on

primers

the

gene

DNA

the

of

by

for

Course

alternative. the

2000). Proc

is

plate

Gerard

rRNA

to

on

WWTF

photospectrometry

C.L.

Sargasso J.R.

a F.

dsDNA

of

take

also

Buzzard

it sequences

is should

correlation

rRNA

normalization

and

Nati

and, still

2004 the

are

in partly

counts

(1995)

of (1997)

part genes

Muyzer

and

influences

Microbial

PCR primer

adverse plates seems

rrn

Acad

Pace

for

Sea,

quantitation

be

in

above

were

Bay

lost.

between

this

inactivation.

the

rRNA

into

quantitated conditions

Do between

from at

abundance

challenging NR.

Sci represents

plates

used

specificity

course.

all

the

unforgettable

for

Therefore, the

to bacterial percentages

Ecology

for

might

U

operon

good

natural

microbial

(1996)

a

to

taxa.

relative

indicate

giving

S

single

growth

using

assess

need

A.

old and

was

J not

the

to

is it

Verschuere

the

Nealson

C.,

Paulsen

Venter

delta

Covariance

Stepanauskas

Operons. Divergence

Silvia Microbiol

Maintenance,

Button

Schut

application

of

Salvesen

heterogeneous

Clostridium

Rainey

Assays.

Analysis

Marcelino

Ribosomal

Kiappenbach

reflects

Kiappenbach

complexes: Hsieh

ultramicrobacterium 64:4433-4438

operon

Fegatella

97 for

De Sargasso

Rogers

maximum

system.

the

Leij

G.

J.C.,

F.,

D.K.

K.,

I.,

J.,

Appi J

ecological F.A.,

characterisation

Acinas, I.

of Y.H.

59:2150-2160

Bacteriol

Nelson

F.A.A.M.,

Andrews

de

of

White

Sea. for

copy L.,

Remington and

and,

RNA

Aquat

Small-Subunit

F.,

(1993)

T. lessons

bacterioplankton

paradoxum

and Vries

Envir

specific

Ward-Rainey

diversity

intervening

Dhont

and,

Science Suzuki,

J.A., Lim

Redundancy

R.,

Vadstein

J.A.,

0.,

Operon

Luisa

Characteristics K.E.,

number

Microb

strategies

186: A.J.

Microbiol

Isolation

Smith E.J.,

Moran from

J.,

Whipps

Peterson

Dunbar

Saxman J.,

growth

K.,

Sphingomonas assessment.

A.

Kjelleberg 304:66-74

Lance

Nelson

and,

2629-2635

of

Sorgeloos

Copy

Gottschal

ribonuclease

0.

Ecol

sequences.

Heidelberg

H.0. DSM

Marcelino, rRNA

bacterial

M.A.,

N.L.,

(2000)

of and

Fierke J.

J.M.

of

of

J.,

66:

composition rate

T. Number

P.R.,

M.

3

bacteria.

(2004)

Typical

W.,

16S

1:85-98

Hoffman

of

7308T

Genes

4605-46

Taylor,

and,

Janssen

and

ribosome

Bergamaschi

S.

in J Evaluation

J.C.,

C.A.

P.

Isolates

communities

Fouts

rRNA Appi

Microbiology

Cole

and, J.F.,

mixed P.

Vanja

Lynch

and,

Schmidt

Environmental

sp.

Database.

Appl

Marine in

Biopolymers

(2004)

Robertson

contains

14

and

J.,

Microbiol

Halpern

P.H.,

Cavicchioli

Mixed

D.E.,

and J.R. strain

Verstraete

Sequences

under

Parsons

Klepac-Ceraj,

J. microbial

Environ

Edward

of

content

environmental

M.

T.M.

Roles

Bacteria

and,

Hippe Levy

B.A. Nucleic plate

in

Microbial

RB2256.

(1993)

A.L.,

Laboratory

142:2087-2095.

multiple

soil

B.R.,

88:442-448

R.,

(2000)

Schmidt

73:79-89 Microbiol of

genome

count

R. F.

W.

in

S.,

and, H.

communities,

and

Baden-Tilison

Rusch

by

in

Acids

DeLong

The

Genomes (1998

Harder

and,

Knap

(1997)

and

Populations

on

Dilution

rRNA

methods

Hollibaugh

Appi

the

variables 16S

use

Conditions.

shotgun

T.M.

roots.

D., Stackebrandt

Res Martin

subunits

66:1328-1333.

)

A.H.,

W.,

Monitoring

of

Implications

marine Eisen

rRNA operon

(2000)

Environ

29:181-184

with

colony

Culture:

Microb (2001)

for

and

Prins H.,

Lomas sequencing

F.

in

via

in

J.A.,

determination

Multiple

J.T.

a

Polz

Pfannkoch copy

genes

Appl its

Quantitative

RNA-protein

5-Nuclease

temperate

development

oligotrophic

R.A., 9

Ecol rrndb:

Microbiol.

E. Growth,

Biolog Wu

possible

(2003)

M.W.,

(2004)

of

number

(1996)

Envir

27:81 with

rRNA D.,

and

rrn

of

the -

Biotechnol.

flashlight

Wolfe

Microbiol

patterns

C.J.

and

fish

83:603-612

and,

r/K-strategists

(Kryptophanaron

Haygood

M.G.

in

the

aifredi)

(1993)

intensive

have

Bioluminescent

a

culture

single

of

rRNA

symbionts

Artemia 2:189-197

operon.

juveniles.

of

Mol

the

in

Caribbean

Mar

J

Appi Biol C

11