DOCSLIB.ORG

Handbook Cover

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Handbook Cover INFRA STRUCTURE CONFERENCE RESILIENT HANDBOOK 2005 Resilient Infrastructure Rotorua, New Zealand 8th-9th August 2005 Conference Handbook Contents SECTION 1 Resilient Infrastucture 2005 - Introduction ............................................................................ 3 A Message from the Chairman of CAE ................................................................................... 5 About CAE .............................................................................................................................. 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 9 Programme ............................................................................................................................ 11 Sponsor Advertisements ...................................................................................................... 13 Biographies of Contributors ................................................................................................. 15 SECTION 2 Presentation Notes............................................................................................................... 23 Resilience in Infrastructure Management ....................................................................................... 25 T D O’Rourke, Cornell University Making Organisations Resilient: Understanding the Reality of the Challenge .............................. 27 Dave Brunsdon (Kestrel Group), Erica Dalziell (University of Canterbury) An Economy for Future Infrastructure Resilience ........................................................................... 35 Kelvin T Sanderson, Managing Director, Business and Economic Research Ltd (BERL) Natural Hazards, Infrastructure and Risk ....................................................................................... 39 Russell Blong, Benfield Australia Managing New Zealand’s Flood Risk Local Government NZ/CAE Study ......................................... 41 Graeme Martin, Otago Regional Council; Marilyn Brown, NM Associates Ltd; Terry Day, T J Day & Associates The New Zealand Electricity Grid: Resilient Infrastructure ............................................................. 47 Kieran Devine, General Manager System Operations, Transpower NZ Limited Resilient Infrastructure: The View From Telecom New Zealand...................................................... 53 Steve Fuller, General Manager Service Delivery Infrastructure Vulnerabilities – An NGC Perspective ....................................................................... 55 Stuart Dickson, Strategic Asset Manager, NGC Water – A $40 Billion Dollar Issue ................................................................................................. 57 Peter Whitehouse, NZ Water & Wastes Association New Zealand Infrastructure Vulnerabilities: A CCIP Perspective ................................................... 61 Chris Roberts, Manager, Centre for Critical Infrastructure Protection Infrastructure Vulnerability: Presentation Synopsis ....................................................................... 65 Bruce Johnson, Ministry of Transport Safeguarding Australia ................................................................................................................... 67 Kevin Murray, Chief Executive, TransGrid Protecting Critical Infrastructure Systems ......................................................................................71 Ian Buckle, University of Nevada Reno 1 CAE: Resilient Infrastructure Community Response to Loss ........................................................................................................ 79 Brenda D Phillips, Oklahoma State University Conceptualising Infrastructure for Safeguarding Communities and Livelihoods ........................... 83 John Handmer, Centre for Risk and Community Safety, RMIT University Prepared for Emergencies? A Resilient UK and meeting the Challenge to London’s Resilience ................................................................................................... 87 Eve Coles, Centre for Disaster Management, Coventry University Measuring and Mitigating Long-term Social and Economic Consequences of Major Disruption Events .................................................................................... 97 Graham S Leonard, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, et al 2 Conference Handbook Resilient Infrastructure 2005 Congestions around ports. Pressure on the energy network. Gridlock on Auckland roads. Wel- lington airport fog-bound again. Concern over storage capacity for liquid fuels. Emergency communications at full stretch... Resilient Infrastructure 2005 is the first New Zealand event to look at the ability of communities as a whole to survive disasters and disruptions. It deals with building resilience into our built and human infrastructure, including natural, economic and social capital. The event brings together national and international perspectives on how to protect physical lifelines, improve social resilience and ensure business and economic activity can continue after a natural disaster or a major human-induced disruption. Importantly, it will focus on the interactions between lifelines, social dynamics and economic activity and explore the myriad of interdependencies, as well as areas of commonality. Disasters and disruptions can take many forms: in just a few years New Zealand has experi- enced major flooding (Horowhenua-Manawatu 2004, Bay of Plenty 2005) increasing restric- tions within transport systems and a threatened outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease. Interna- tionally we have seen the long term devastation from the Indian Ocean tsunami, terrorism, and epidemics of influenza. It is a matter of vital importance to government, business and the public-at-large that the flow of services provided by the nation’s infrastructure continues unimpeded in the face of a broad range of natural and man-made hazards. Whenever these facilities are damaged, disrupted, or simply unable to deliver the required services, the impact on society can be disastrous. Resilient Infrastructure 2005 brings together leading specialists to help explore and under- stand these issues, to examine the interactions and identify new and emerging responses. Case studies and examples of best practices will draw these ideas together and illustrate a way forward. Organiser The Centre for Advanced Engineering (CAE) exists to broaden New Zealand’s technical knowledge for the benefit of all New Zealanders. CAE has done this successfully and consistently since its foundation in 1987. Today CAE is at the forefront of the application of engineering knowledge and new perspectives and solutions. As an independent non-partisan body, CAE is uniquely positioned to pioneer, integrate, broker knowledge and raise awareness. In collaboration with: Established in 1919, Engineers Australia has provided the national focus for the development of all aspects of engineering as well as representing the interests of Australian engineers and the communities they serve. Its objectives are to: raise the professional standing of the engineering team; enhance professional development through graduate development programmes; cultivate partnerships with industry; and be the voice of Australian engineering and increase engineer’s community visibility. The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) is the professional body which represents professional engineers from all disciplines in New Zealand. Its aim is to develop and improve the professional practice of engineering in New Zealand for the benefit of its people and industry, supporting its increasing diversity of application and disciplines, and its globalisation. Major Sponsor: Supporting Sponsors: 3 CAE: Resilient Infrastructure 4 Conference Handbook A Message from the Chairman of CAE... Like most developed countries, New Zealand depends on a complex system of networks and infrastructure to support our economy and society at large. Modern infrastructure is increas- ingly advanced but is vulnerable to major pressures and occasional disruption. New Zealand must address the need to make its infrastructure strong and resistant to external events. If we do not, we risk the possibility of outages that contribute to a phenomenon known as “cascading failure.” If this occurs, New Zealand’s economic and social wellbeing will be severely threatened and network providers will be exposed to a range of risks and liabilities not seen before. We must confront the key question: How can we plan for infrastructure that is robust and able to withstand major external pressures? In other words, how do we make it resilient? CAE is proud to announce New Zealand’s first international event to plan for the safeguarding of infrastructure systems and the social and economic activity they support. Resilient Infrastructure 2005 promises to be a watershed of critical assessment and innovation in infrastructure planning and risk assessment. It will be of direct benefit to any organisation or professional concerned with infrastructure provision and the delivery of essential services. The need for resilience in our built infrastructure is an issue of utmost importance. We must acknowledge the growing complexity of infrastructure management and protect our communi- ties from the economic and social decline that can occur after a major disruption. I look forward to participating in these discussions with you. Francis Small,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leadership in Aotearoa New Zealand: Māori and Pākehā
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. LEADERSHIP IN AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND: MĀORI AND PĀKEHĀ PERCEPTIONS OF OUTSTANDING LEADERSHIP A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Management at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand Dale Marie Pfeifer 2005 ABSTRACT Exploring the leadership of New Zealand’s diverse cultural groups is of great importance in providing effective leadership. New Zealand’s population is diverse and rapidly changing (Statistics New Zealand, 2004b), resulting in leader‐follower relationships increasingly being enacted in the cross‐cultural context. As research suggests, cultural variations of leadership exist (Brodbeck et al., 2000; House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, & Gupta, 2004), and inappropriate leadership could stifle the leadership process (Lord & Maher, 1993), it may be especially important to recognise cultural difference in leadership. Well‐respected leadership theorists suggest that leadership behaviour is both culturally similar and different (Brodbeck et al., 2000; House et al., 2004), with distinct prototypes of leadership existing in each culture. Followers will only be influenced by leaders’ behaviour which they recognise from that prototype (Lord & Maher, 1993). To be effective, leaders’ behaviour must match followers’ culturally contingent leadership expectation (Popper & Druyan, 2001). New Zealand research supports this theory, confirming the existence of culturally unique leadership behaviour domestically (Ah Chong & Thomas, 1997; Love, 1991a). If the leadership expectations of New Zealand’s diverse cultural groups are not recognised, the result will be ineffective leadership for significant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Political Donations in New Zealand Under MMP: 1996-2019
    Patterns of political donations in New Zealand under MMP: 1996-2019 Thomas Anderson and Simon Chapple Working Paper 20/05 Working Paper 20/02 2020 INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE AND POLICY STUDIES WORKING PAPER 20/05 MONTH/YEAR November 2020 AUTHOR Thomas Anderson and Simon Chapple INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE AND School of Government POLICY STUDIES Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600 Wellington 6140 New Zealand For any queries relating to this working paper, please contact [email protected] DISCLAIMER The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are strictly those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Governance and Policy Studies, the School of Government or Victoria University of Wellington. Introduction The issue of political donations in New Zealand is regularly in the news. While the media report on their immediately newsworthy dimensions, no systematic data work has been done on political donations in New Zealand in the Mixed Member Proportional electoral system (MMP) period. The most comprehensive analysis covering the first part of the MMP period and before, which is now somewhat dated but contains a good summary of the existing literature, is in Bryce Edwards’s doctoral thesis (Edwards, 2003), especially Chapter Seven, “Party Finance and Professionalisation”. Donations are, of course, a subset of sources of Party finance, and it is in this context that Edwards deals with them. He draws eclectically on several sources for his qualitative and quantitative analysis, including largely descriptive work of political scientists, government reports, former politicians’ memoirs, historians and media reports, as well as using data on donations from the Electoral Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 23-27 September 2020
    1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 23-27 September 2020 Attention: Television New Zealand Contact: (04) 913-3000 Release date: 28 September 2020 Level One 46 Sale Street, Auckland CBD PO Box 33690 Takapuna Auckland 0740 Ph: (09) 919-9200 Level 9, Legal House 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington 6011 Ph: (04) 913-3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of results .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key political events ................................................................ .......................................................................... 4 Question order and wording ............................................................................................................................ 5 Party vote ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Preferred Prime Minister ................................................................................................................................. 8 Economic outlook .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NZ Aid Under the New Labour Government
    Published on November 6, 2020 Nanaia Mahuta, New Zealand's newly-appointed Foreign Minister. (New Zealand Labour Party) Link: https://devpolicy.org/nz-aid-under-the-new-labour-government-20201106-2/ Page 1 of 5 Date downloaded: September 26, 2021 Published on November 6, 2020 NZ aid under the new Labour government By Terence Wood On 17 October, New Zealand’s Labour party was re-elected in a landslide. The same election saw New Zealand First, the nationalist party that had been a linchpin in Labour’s coalition government, wiped out. As a result, Winston Peters, New Zealand First’s leader, is no longer foreign minister and no longer in charge of New Zealand aid. In the first decade of the millennium, an aid-friendly Labour-led government transformed New Zealand’s government aid program. Labour’s current leader – Jacinda Ardern – exudes empathy, and was once the head of an internationalist, social democratic youth movement. These must be good times for New Zealand government aid, right? Not necessarily. Winston Peters may have peddled xenophobia as he scrounged around for votes, but as foreign minister – a role he held from 2005 to 2008, and again from 2017 to 2020 – he lost his hostility to the rest of the world remarkably quickly. Both times he served in the role, aid grew as a share of GNI. Indeed, Peters successfully lobbied for more aid in 2018, prevailing over Treasury, which opposed the increase. Although he took an active interest in aid volumes, Peters was less interested in aid quality. He was happy to trust the bureaucracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sociology of a Pandemic Countering a COVID ‘Disinfodemic’ with a Campus Media Initiative
    CLIMATE CRISIS AND CORONAVIRUS The sociology of a pandemic Countering a COVID ‘disinfodemic’ with a campus media initiative Abstract: Parallel with the global spread of the novel coronavirus pandemic, a dangerous ‘disinfodemic’ has been infecting the flow of information world- wide. Communication and media outlets have faced a new challenge with not only being responsible for reportage and analysis of a fast-moving public health emergency—the biggest this century, but forced to sift through the mass circulation of falsehoods that have spread as rapidly as the virus. Concerned about the risks for both health and public responses to disinformation, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres identified the ‘new enemy’ as a ‘growing surge of disinformation’. The UN launched a COVID-19 Com- munications for Solidarity Initiative to rapidly inform people about facts and science and to ‘promote and inspire acts of humanity’ globally. Also alarmed by the growing disinformation trend, the World Health Organisation warned that the ‘same enemy’ also involved ‘an increase in stigma, hate speech and hate crimes’ over the pandemic. Aotearoa New Zealand is one of the few coun- tries in the world whose strategy of COVID elimination has been a sustained approach to ‘keep the virus out, find it and stamp it out’. Evoking a theme of ‘our team of five million’ and national kindness, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has led a remarkable campaign blending decisive action and trans- parency. As at October 25, the country has had only 22 deaths from the first wave of the pandemic and with a second wave cluster in August three further deaths and a combined total of 1935 cases with 260 having been contained in quarantine or managed isolation at the border.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019ANNUAL Report
    ANNUAL REport 2019 THE NEW ZEALAND INITIATIVE — i The New Zealand Initiative Annual Report 2019 © The New Zealand Initiative 2020 Published by The New Zealand Initiative PO Box 10147 Wellington 6143 New Zealand www.nzinitiative.org.nz Designed by Angela Whitney, www.angelawhitney.com Printed by True North New Zealand Ltd Cover photo: Oliver Hartwich / Villa Maria Estate, Auckland (2019) ii — THE NEW ZEALAND INITIATIVE Contents Foreword 03 Highlights of our year 30 What we stand for 04 What others say about us 42 Our principles 05 Our team 44 Our research & submissions 09 Our board 47 Our engagement 18 Our members 50 Engagement with members 19 Events 21 Media 28 THE NEW ZEALAND INITIATIVE — 01 “The New Zealand Initiative does remarkable work in raising rational discourse and critical thinking. Its contribution is incredibly valuable for society, especially one which focuses on growth, development and prosperity. The provocation of ideas by the Initiative puts New Zealand on the map as a global thought leader and creates a breeding ground for important conversations to tremendously advance New Zealand as a whole.” Suzi Jamil | Owner and Director, Think Inc. Foreword The Prime Minister called 2019 “the year of Given these widely shared goals, we are We also organised our business delegation delivery”. Later this year, voters will deliver most disappointed with the speed of reform visit to Denmark and Sweden, which saw their verdict on that statement and promise. in New Zealand. We can and should do three dozen New Zealand business leaders much better. learn about the Scandinavian economies. At the Initiative, it was definitely a year of We hosted events with domestic and delivery for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change
    UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED How this brief is organised This brief is organised into four parts: Part One – The international role of the Minister of Climate Change Provides a brief summary of your role and the responsibilities and processes that come with it, as well as information on how the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade supports you in your role; Part Two – New Zealand’s foreign and international climate change policy Provides strategic foreign and international climate policy overviews and outlines New Zealand’s international climate change priorities as currently agreed; Part Three – Significant near-term policy issues Provides a brief overview of issues that will require early ministerial awareness and/or your decisions; and Part Four – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade Provides some contextual information about the Ministry. 1 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 2 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Part One The international role of the Minister of Climate Change 3 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 4 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED International role of the Minister of Climate Change As you are well aware, climate change will present deep challenges over the next decade in terms of both impacts and responses, including ensuring economic recovery from COVID aligns with the Paris Agreement. New Zealand has a compelling national interest in global action to reduce emissions because our well-being effectively depends on others’ action. This interest is amplified by Pacific island countries’ acute vulnerability to climate change effects and their pressing need for such action. New Zealand needs to be actively engaged in formal and informal international climate change processes to be able to influence the effectiveness of the global response and to ensure our particular circumstances and those of our Pacific partners are understood and our interests addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 17-21 September 2020
    1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 17-21 September 2020 Attention: Television New Zealand Contact: (04) 913-3000 Release date: 22 September 2020 Level One 46 Sale Street, Auckland CBD PO Box 33690 Takapuna Auckland 0740 Ph: (09) 919-9200 Level 9, Legal House 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington 6011 Ph: (04) 913-3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of results .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key political events ................................................................ .......................................................................... 4 Question order and wording ............................................................................................................................ 5 Party vote ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Preferred Prime Minister ................................................................................................................................. 8 Economic outlook .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Results Chapter 1 of 3
    The Creative Country: Policy, Practice and Place in New Zealand's Creative Economy 1999-2008 Jason Smith A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 2010 Faculty of Applied Humanities Primary Supervisor: Professor Ian Shirley Secondary Supervisor: Professor Marilyn Waring Table of Contents Attestation of Authorship 8 Acknowledgements 9 Abstract 10 Chapter 1 Introduction........................................................................................... 1 Background to the study ..................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 Background and Critical Review of theory ................................ 5 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................5 2 Matters of definition ................................................................................................................5 3 Economic development of the creative economy ...................................................................9 Defining the Creative Economy ...................................................................................................9 Cities at the centre .................................................................................................................... 10 Florida and the creative class ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing for Incoming Minister for Disarmament and Arms Control 2020
    UNCLASSIFIED Contents How this brief is organised 1 Part One – The role of the Minister for Disarmament and Arms Control 3 Role of the Minister for Disarmament and Arms Control 5 The Government’s priorities on disarmament and arms control 6 Statutory and related responsibilities 7 New Zealand’s role in disarmament and non-proliferation 8 Proposed programme of engagements to March 2021 9 How the Ministry supports you 10 Part Two – New Zealand’s foreign policy and disarmament and non-proliferation policy 13 Strategic foreign policy overview 15 Disarmament and non-proliferation policy overview 24 Part Three – Significant near-term policy issues 31 Issues for immediate attention or decision 33 Part Four – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 39 A snapshot of MFAT 41 Purpose, strategic framework and priorities 42 Functions and footprint 48 Ministry leaders and Heads of Mission 51 Consular services and emergency response 55 New Zealand connections 57 Budget 59 Appendices 63 Appendix 1: NZ Inc offshore footprint 65 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED How this brief is organised This brief is organised into four parts: Part One – The role of the Minister for Disarmament and Arms Control Provides a brief summary of your role and the responsibilities that come with it, as well as information on how the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade supports you in your role; Part Two – New Zealand’s foreign policy and disarmament and non- proliferation policy Provides a strategic foreign policy overview and outlines New Zealand’s current disarmament and non-proliferation policy approach; Part Three – Significant near-term policy issues Provides a brief overview of issues that will require early Ministerial awareness and/or your decisions; and Part Four – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade Provides some contextual information about the Ministry.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC MEETING Education Centre, Kenepuru Hospital, Raiha Street
    PUBLIC 6 December 2013 - Agenda HUTT VALLEY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD PUBLIC MEETING Education Centre, Kenepuru Hospital, Raiha Street Friday, 6 December 2013 at 8.00am Item Action Presenter Min Time Pg 1. PROCEDURAL 5 8.00 am 1.1 Karakia 1.2 Apologies RECORD Virginia Hope 1.3 Declaration of Interests CONSIDER Virginia Hope 1.4 Conflicts of Interest RECORD Virginia Hope DISCUSSION PAPERS 2. Chair Report RECEIVE Virginia Hope 5 8.05 am 3. Chief Executive Report NOTE Graham Dyer 10 8.10 am INFORMATION PAPER 4. New Graduate Nurse Employment NOTE Helen Pocknell 5 8.20 am COMMITTEE REPORT BACKS 5. Hospital Advisory Committee NOTE Peter Glensor 5 8.25 am OTHER 6. General 5 8:30 am 7. Resolutions to Exclude the Public APPROVE 5 8.35 am CLOSE 8.40 am Hutt Valley District Health Board 1 PUBLIC 6 December 2013 - Procedural Business HUTT VALLEY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Interest Register 2 MAY 2013 Name Interest Dr Virginia Hope ∑ Chair, Hutt Valley District Health Board Chairperson ∑ Member, Capital & Coast, Hutt Valley and Wairarapa DHBs Community Public Health Advisory Committee and Disability Support Advisory Committee ∑ Ex Officio, Finance Risk & Audit Committee, Hutt Valley District Health Board ∑ Ex Officio, Hospital Advisory Committee, Hutt Valley and Wairarapa District Health Boards ∑ Chair, Capital & Coast District Health Board ∑ Health Programme Leader, Institute of Environmental Science & Research ∑ Director & Shareholder, Jacaranda Limited ∑ Fellow, Royal Australasian College of Medical Administration ∑ Fellow and New Zealand Committee Member,
    [Show full text]
  • MFAT Strategic Intentions 2020-2024
    A.1 SOI (2020) Strategic 2020-2024 MANATU AORERE Intentions 1 Contents Foreword from our Minister 02 | MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND AND TRADE AFFAIRS FOREIGN OF MINISTRY | Introduction from our Chief Executive 03 Our context 05 STRATEGIC INTENTIONS 2020-2024 2020-2024 INTENTIONS STRATEGIC Our strategic direction 13 Managing our functions and 34 Presented to the operations House of Representatives Asset management pursuant to Section 39 of the and investment 37 intentions Public Finance Act 1989 2 3 Foreword from our Introduction from our Minister Chief Executive Forging a path in the world that delivers The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and benefits to New Zealanders is at the Trade acts in the world to build a safer, heart of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs more prosperous and more sustainable and Trade’s mission. future for New Zealanders. Delivering a safer, more prosperous and more Our Strategic Intentions 2020-2024 have been sustainable future for New Zealand has always informed by a refresh of our Strategic Framework that been demanding. The COVID-19 pandemic seriously was initiated in late 2019, but completed in mid-2020. complicates the international operating context, making This has enabled us to re-focus our efforts on areas | MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND AND TRADE AFFAIRS FOREIGN OF MINISTRY | the achievement of the Ministry’s objectives all the where COVID-19 will require us to deliver different more challenging. priorities in different ways as part of the All-of- Government recovery and response. Even before COVID-19, the international environment was becoming more turbulent, characterised by At the same time, we have taken a long-term view of heightened strategic tension and new levels of what the Ministry must focus on to advance disruption, disorder and risk.
    [Show full text]