DOCSLIB.ORG

GPS/GNSS Antenna Characterization GPS‐ABC Workshop V RTCA Washington, DC October 14, 2016 Christopher Hegarty, the MITRE Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GPS/GNSS Antenna Characterization GPS‐ABC Workshop V RTCA Washington, DC October 14, 2016 Christopher Hegarty, the MITRE Corporation GPS/GNSS Antenna Characterization GPS‐ABC Workshop V RTCA Washington, DC October 14, 2016 Christopher Hegarty, The MITRE Corporation The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Research and Technology Advancing transportation innovation for the public good John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Overview One component of the Department of Transportation’s GPS Adjacent Band Compatibility Study is the characterization of GPS/GNSS receiver antennas Such characterization is needed to: . Compare radiated and conducted (wired) test results . Apply interference tolerance masks (ITMs) to use cases where adjacent band transmitters are seen by GPS/GNSS receiver antennas at any direction besides zenith (antenna boresight) This presentation summarizes characterization data obtained thus far: . Gain patterns for 14 external antennas o Right‐hand/left‐hand circular polarization (RHCP/LHCP), vertical (V), and horizontal (H) polarizations o 22 frequencies: 1475, 1490, 1495, 1505, 1520, 1530, 1535, 1540, 1545, 1550, 1555, 1575, 1595, 1615, 1620, 1625, 1630, 1635, 1640, 1645, 1660, and 1675 MHz . Approximate L1 RHCP relative gain patterns for 4 antennas integrated with receivers . Saturation measurements for the 14 external (all active) antennas . All antennas provided by the USG 2 Gain Pattern Measurement Approach External antennas . Measured in 30’ x 21’ x 15’ anechoic chamber at MITRE, Bedford, MA . Calibrated absolute patterns produced using Nearfield Systems Inc measurement system and software . Full azimuth/elevation patterns produced for RHCP, LHCP, V, and H polarizations at 22 frequencies Integrated antennas . Approximate relative RHCP gain patterns at L1 estimated using live‐sky GPS C/A‐code C/N0 measurements 3 External Antenna Gain Measurements* *Note: 1. Only RHCP results shown in this presentation as examples. LHCP, V, and H polarization gains were additionally measured. 2. When viewing gain vs frequency plots, please keep in mind that measurements were made on only the 22 frequencies listed earlier. 3. All external antennas measured were active, and measured gain is for the entire transducer (passive antenna element + active subassembly) 4 Antenna #1 (TIM) 45 50 40 40 30 35 20 30 10 25 0 20 Gain (dBic) Gain Gain (dBic) Gain -10 15 -20 10 -30 5 -40 -50 0 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 Frequency (MHz) Off-boresight angle (deg) RHCP Gain at L1 vs RHCP Gain at Boresight Off‐boresight Angle vs Frequency Peak RHCP gain = 41.5 dBic Directivity = 4.4 dBic Difference in RHCP gain between 90 and 5 deg = 4.6 dB 5 Antenna #2 (HPR) 40 40 35 30 30 20 25 10 20 0 15 -10 Gain (dBic) (dBic)Gain 10 -20 5 -30 0 -40 -5 -50 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 Off-boresight angle (deg) Frequency (MHz) RHCP Gain at L1 vs RHCP Gain at Boresight Off‐boresight Angle vs Frequency Peak RHCP gain = 37.2 dBic Directivity = 3.2 dBic Difference in RHCP gain between 90 and 5 deg = 3.3 dB 6 Antenna #3 (TIM) 40 40 35 20 30 0 25 -20 Gain (dBic) Gain (dBic) 20 -40 15 -60 10 -80 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 Off-boresight angle (deg) Frequency (MHz) RHCP Gain at L1 vs RHCP Gain at Boresight Off‐boresight Angle vs Frequency Peak RHCP gain = 38.0 dBic Directivity = 3.9 dBic Difference in RHCP gain between 90 and 5 deg = 4.1 dB 7 Antenna #4 (GLN) 20 20 15 15 10 5 10 0 5 -5 Gain (dBic)Gain (dBic)Gain -10 0 -15 -20 -5 -25 -10 -30 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 Off-boresight angle (deg) Frequency (MHz) RHCP Gain at L1 vs RHCP Gain at Boresight Off‐boresight Angle vs Frequency Peak RHCP gain = 19.0 dBic Directivity = 4.4 dBic Difference in RHCP gain between 90 and 5 deg = 4.4 dB 8 Antenna #5 (GLN) 25 30 20 20 10 15 0 10 -10 Gain (dBic) Gain (dBic) 5 -20 0 -30 -5 -40 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 Off-boresight angle (deg) Frequency (MHz) RHCP Gain at L1 vs RHCP Gain at Boresight Off‐boresight Angle vs Frequency Peak RHCP gain = 21.8 dBic Directivity = 4.4 dBic Difference in RHCP gain between 90 and 5 deg = 6.0 dB 9 Antenna #6 (HPR) 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 Gain (dBic) 5 (dBic) Gain 5 0 0 -5 -5 -10 -10 -15 -15 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 Off-boresight angle (deg) Frequency (MHz) RHCP Gain at L1 vs RHCP Gain at Boresight Off‐boresight Angle vs Frequency Peak RHCP gain = 32.5 dBic Directivity = 6.7 dBic Difference in RHCP gain between 90 and 5 deg = 11.6 dB 10 Antenna #7 (HPR) 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 Gain (dBic)Gain (dBic)Gain 0 0 -10 -10 -20 -20 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 Off-boresight angle (deg) Frequency (MHz) RHCP Gain at L1 vs RHCP Gain at Boresight Off‐boresight Angle vs Frequency Peak RHCP gain = 33.7 dBic Directivity = 7.8 dBic Difference in RHCP gain between 90 and 5 deg = 11.6 dB 11 Antenna #8 (TIM) 35 40 30 30 20 25 10 20 0 Gain (dBic) Gain (dBic) 15 -10 10 -20 5 -30 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 Off-boresight angle (deg) Frequency (MHz) RHCP Gain at L1 vs RHCP Gain at Boresight Off‐boresight Angle vs Frequency Peak RHCP gain = 32.8 dBic Directivity = 5.0 dBic Difference in RHCP gain between 90 and 5 deg = 8.4 dB 12 L1 RHCP Relative Gain Pattern Summary 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 Relative Gain (dBic) Gain Relative -30 -35 -40 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 Off-boresight angle (deg) Red lines correspond to 5 deg elevation angle on either side of antenna. 13 Boresight RHCP Frequency Selectivity Summary 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 Relative Attenuation (dB) Attenuation Relative -100 -120 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 Frequency (MHz) 14 Integrated Antenna Gain Measurements 15 N Antenna #9 (GLN) 13 10 27 28 8 PRN Elevation C/N0 30 W E (deg) (dB‐Hz) 16 7 1 36.9 43.5 11 17 1 7 71.2 47.4 9 9 4.7 32.4 S 11 60.8 41.0 0 16 8.8 36.2 -5 17 3.9 26.0 -10 28 26.7 39.8 -15 Relative Gain (dB) Gain Relative -20 -25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Elevation Angle (deg) 16 N Antenna #10 (GLN) 13 10 27 PRN Elevation C/N0 28 8 (deg) (dB‐Hz) 30 W E 16 1 36.9 42.1 7 11 7 71.2 47.5 17 1 8 59.1 47.0 9 S 9 4.7 31.3 0 10 1.8 25.3 -5 11 60.8 49.6 13 49.6 37.9 -10 17 3.9 30.7 -15 27 24.4 47.6 (dB) Gain Relative 28 26.7 42.6 -20 -25 30 57.3 44.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Elevation Angle (deg) 17 N Antenna #11 (GLN) 13 10 27 28 PRN Elevation C/N0 8 30 (deg) (dB‐Hz) W E 16 7 1 36.9 41.9 11 8 59.1 45.4 17 1 9 4.7 26.9 9 S 10 1.8 31.9 0 11 60.8 44.9 -2 -4 13 9.0 35.8 -6 17 3.9 31.3 -8 -10 28 26.7 35.6 -12 Relative Gain (dB) Gain Relative 30 57.3 43.7 -14 -16 -18 -20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Elevation Angle (deg) 18 N Antenna #12 (HPR) 13 10 27 28 8 PRN Elevation C/N0 30 W E 16 (deg) (dB‐Hz) 7 1 36.9 47.2 11 17 1 7 71.2 52.0 9 8 59.1 51.3 S 0 9 4.7 37.8 -2 11 60.8 53.2 -4 13 9.0 39.0 -6 16 8.8 42.0 -8 -10 17 3.9 39.6 (dB) Gain Relative 27 24.4 45.8 -12 28 26.7 49.0 -14 -16 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 30 57.3 50.7 Elevation Angle (deg) 19 Saturation Measurements and Summary 20 Saturation Measurements For 14 external antennas, output vs input power measured for single tone at 22 frequencies (see example results below) Results are being processed to estimate small‐signal 1‐dB compression point vs frequency Processing will take into account 2:1 difference in compression between small‐signal and large‐signal gain* 1.540GHz 1.545 1.55 1.555 1.575 1.595 1.615 5 0 ‐5 ‐10 ‐15 (dBm) ‐20 ‐25 Level ‐30 Rx ‐35 ‐40 AUT ‐45 ‐50 ‐55 ‐60 ‐30 ‐25 ‐20 ‐15 ‐10 ‐50 5101520 Probe Tx Level (dBm) *See, e.g., Domino et al., “Polynomial Model of Blocker Effects…”, Applied 21 Microwave & Wireless, June 2001. Summary GPS/GNSS receiver antenna characterization is an important component of the Department of Transportation’s GPS Adjacent Band Compatibility Study 18 antennas have thus far been characterized .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington DC 20554
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Unlicensed Use of the 6 GHz Band ) ET Docket No. 18-295 ) Expanding Flexible Use of the Mid-Band ) GN Docket No. 17-183 Spectrum Between 3.17 and 24 GHz ) COMMENTS OF THE FIXED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS COALITION Cheng-yi Liu Mitchell Lazarus FLETCHER, HEALD & HILDRETH, P.L.C. 1300 North 17th Street, 11th Floor Arlington, VA 22209 703-812-0400 Counsel for the Fixed Wireless February 15, 2019 Communications Coalition TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 B. 6 GHz FS Bands and the Public Interest ................................................................................. 6 C. Fallacies on RLAN/FS Interference ........................................................................................ 9 1. High-off-the-ground FS antennas .................................................................................... 9 2. Indoor operation ............................................................................................................. 10 3. Statistical interference prediction .................................................................................. 10 D. Automatic Frequency Control Using Exclusion Zones ......................................................... 13 E. Multipath Fading and Fade Margin ....................................................................................... 15 1. Momentary interference
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Class of Antennas Utilizing MEMS, EBG and Septum Polarizers Including Near-Field Coupling Analysis
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Design of a Class of Antennas Utilizing MEMS, EBG and Septum Polarizers including Near-field Coupling Analysis A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering by Ilkyu Kim 2012 c Copyright by Ilkyu Kim 2012 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Design of a Class of Antennas Utilizing MEMS, EBG and Septum Polarizers including Near-field Coupling Analysis by Ilkyu Kim Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 Professor Yahya Rahmat-Samii, Chair Recent developments in mobile communications have led to an increased appearance of short-range communications and high data-rate signal transmission. New technologies provides the need for an accurate near-field coupling analysis and novel antenna designs. An ability to effectively estimate the coupling within the near-field region is required to realize short-range communications. Currently, two common techniques that are applicable to the near-field coupling problem are 1) integral form of coupling formula and 2) generalized Friis formula. These formulas are investigated with an emphasis on straightforward calculation and accuracy for various distances between the two antennas. The coupling formulas are computed for a variety of antennas, and several antenna configurations are evaluated through full-wave simulation and indoor measurement in order to validate these techniques. In addition, this research aims to design multi- functional and high performance antennas based on MEMS (Microelectromechanical ii Systems) switches, EBG (Electromagnetic Bandgap) structures, and septum polarizers. A MEMS switch is incorporated into a slot loaded patch antenna to attain frequency reconfigurability.
    [Show full text]
  • Beamforming in 5G Mm-Wave Radio Networks Importance of Frequency Multiplexing for Users in Urban Macro Environments
    UPTEC E 20002 Examensarbete 30 hp Mars 2020 Beamforming in 5G mm-wave radio networks Importance of frequency multiplexing for users in urban macro environments Carl Lutnaes Abstract Beamforming in 5G mm-wave radio networks Carl Lutnaes Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultet UTH-enheten 5G brings a few key technological improvements compared to previous generations in telecommunications. These include, but are not limited to, greater speeds, Besöksadress: increased capacity and lower latency. These improvements are in part due to using Ångströmlaboratoriet Lägerhyddsvägen 1 high band frequencies, where increased capacity is found. By advancements in Hus 4, Plan 0 various technologies, mobile broadband traffic has become increasingly chatty, i.e. more small packets are being sent. From a capacity standpoint this Postadress: characteristic poses a challenge for early 5G millimeter-wave advanced antenna Box 536 751 21 Uppsala systems. This thesis investigates if network performance of 5G millimetre-wave systems can be improved by increasing the utilisation of the bandwidth by using Telefon: adaptive beamforming. Two adaptive codebook approaches are proposed; a single- 018 – 471 30 03 beam and a multi-beam approach. The simulations are performed in an outdoor urban Telefax: macro scenario. The results show that for a small packet scenario with good 018 – 471 30 00 coverage the ability to frequency multiplex users is important for good network performance. Hemsida: http://www.teknat.uu.se/student Handledare: Erik Larsson Ämnesgranskare: Steffi Knorn Examinator: Tomas Nyberg ISSN: 1654-7616, UPTEC E 20002 Popul¨arvetenskaplig sammanfattning 5G ¨arn¨astagenerations telekommunikationsstandard. Nya 5G–n¨atverksprodukter kommer att ha ¨okad kapacitet vilket leder till snabbare data¨overf¨oringaroch mindre f¨ordr¨ojningarf¨orenheter i n¨atverken, exempelvis mobiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Earth Stations Validation, Maintenance & Repair
    Keysight Technologies Precision Validation, Maintenance and Repair of Satellite Earth Stations FieldFox Handheld Analyzers Application Note To assure maximum system uptime, routine maintenance and occasional troubleshooting and repair must be done quickly, accurately and in a variety of weather conditions. This application note describes breakthrough technologies that have transformed the way systems can be tested in the field while providing higher performance, improved accuracy, capability and frequency coverage to 50 GHz. A single FieldFox handheld analyzer will be shown to be an ideal test solution due to its high performance, broad capabilities, and lightweight portability, replacing traditional methods of having to transport multiple benchtop instruments to the earth station sites. 02 | Keysight | Precision Validation, Maintenance and Repair of Satellite Earth Stations Using FieldFox handheld analyzers - Application Note A satellite communications system is comprised of two segments, one operating in space and one op- erating on earth. Figure 1 shows a block diagram of the space and ground segments found in a typical satellite communications system. The space segment includes a diverse set of spacecraft technologies varying in operating frequency, coverage area and function. The satellite orbit is typically related to the application. For example, about half of the orbiting satellites operate in a Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) that maintains a fixed position above the earth’s equator. These GEO satellites provide Fixed Satellite Services (FSS) including broadcast television and radio. The location of GEO satellites result in limited coverage to the polar regions. For navigation systems requiring complete global coverage, constellations of satellites operate in a lower altitude, namely in the Medium Earth Orbit (MEO), that move around the earth in 2-24 hour orbits.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS Rules of Thumb
    ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS Rules of Thumb: 1. The Gain of an antenna with losses is given by: Where BW are the elev & az another is: 2 and N 4B0A 0 ' Efficiency beamwidths in degrees. G • Where For approximating an antenna pattern with: 2 A ' Physical aperture area ' X 0 8 G (1) A rectangle; X'41253,0 '0.7 ' BW BW typical 8 wavelength N 2 ' ' (2) An ellipsoid; X 52525,0typical 0.55 2. Gain of rectangular X-Band Aperture G = 1.4 LW Where: Length (L) and Width (W) are in cm 3. Gain of Circular X-Band Aperture 3 dB Beamwidth G = d20 Where: d = antenna diameter in cm 0 = aperture efficiency .5 power 4. Gain of an isotropic antenna radiating in a uniform spherical pattern is one (0 dB). .707 voltage 5. Antenna with a 20 degree beamwidth has a 20 dB gain. 6. 3 dB beamwidth is approximately equal to the angle from the peak of the power to Peak power Antenna the first null (see figure at right). to first null Radiation Pattern 708 7. Parabolic Antenna Beamwidth: BW ' d Where: BW = antenna beamwidth; 8 = wavelength; d = antenna diameter. The antenna equations which follow relate to Figure 1 as a typical antenna. In Figure 1, BWN is the azimuth beamwidth and BW2 is the elevation beamwidth. Beamwidth is normally measured at the half-power or -3 dB point of the main lobe unless otherwise specified. See Glossary. The gain or directivity of an antenna is the ratio of the radiation BWN BW2 intensity in a given direction to the radiation intensity averaged over Azimuth and Elevation Beamwidths all directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 12 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Telecommunications
    DESCANSO Design and Performance Summary Series Article 12 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Telecommunications Jim Taylor Dennis K. Lee Shervin Shambayati Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California September 2006 This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Prologue Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter The cover image is an artist’s rendition of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) as its orbit carries it over the Martian pole. The large, articulated, circularly shaped high-gain antenna above the two articulated paddle-shaped solar panels points at the Earth as the solar panels point toward the Sun. This antenna is the most noticeable feature of the communications system, providing a link for receiving commands from the Deep Space Stations on the Earth and for sending science and engineering information to the stations. The antenna is larger than on any previous deep-space mission, and the amplifiers that send the data on two frequencies are also more powerful than previously used in deep space. Included in the command data and the science data is information that the orbiter relays to and from vehicles on the surface as it passes over them. The orbiter uses the Electra transceiver and a smaller low-gain antenna for this communication. The antenna is the smaller. gold-colored cylinder pointed toward the surface. The transceiver is the first Electra flown, and it has the capability to communicate efficiently with surface vehicles such as Phoenix and Mars Science Laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation Between Antennas of IMT Base Stations in the Land Mobile Service
    Report ITU-R M.2244 (11/2011) Isolation between antennas of IMT base stations in the land mobile service M Series Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services ii Rep. ITU-R M.2244 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio-frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolution ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information database can also be found. Series of ITU-R Reports (Also available online at http://www.itu.int/publ/R-REP/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems SM Spectrum management Note: This ITU-R Report was approved in English by the Study Group under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Spire-Kepler
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Petition to Revise Sections 2.106 and 25.142 of ) RM- _______ the Commission’s Rules to Expand Spectrum ) Availability for Small Satellites by Adding a ) Mobile-Satellite Service Allocation in the ) Frequency Band 2020-2025 MHz ) To: FCC Secretary PETITION FOR RULEMAKING Trey Hanbury Nickolas G. Spina Tom Peters KEPLER COMMUNICATIONS INC. George John 196 Spadina Avenue, Suite 400 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Toronto, CA M5T 2C2 555 13th Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 Michelle A. McClure SPIRE GLOBAL, INC. Counsel to Spire and Kepler 8000 Towers Crescent Drive, Suite 1225 Vienna, VA 22182 October 30, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Spire Global, Inc. (“Spire”) and Kepler Communications Inc. (“Kepler”) petition the Commission to initiate a rulemaking to add a Mobile-Satellite Service (“MSS”) allocation to the 2020-2025 MHz band and make the spectrum available for use by small satellites (“smallsats”).1 Smallsats are technologically sophisticated satellites—sometimes as small as a bread loaf—that have lowered the cost of access to space and opened new platforms for scientific and commercial innovation. Only a few short years after their introduction, smallsats are already conducting advanced earth exploration, assisting with weather monitoring and disaster response, supporting state-of-the- art machine-to-machine communications, and advancing the frontiers of science. Analysts predict the smallsat market, which is comprised of companies with extensive operations in the United States, will increase from an estimated $2.8 billion industry in 2020 to a $7.1 billion industry by 2025.2 At present, however, the United States has not allocated any spectrum for exclusive commercial smallsat use.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Throughout Its Quarter-Century History, Qualcomm Has Pioneered
    D. Throughout Its Quarter-Century History, Qualcomm Has Pioneered The Development OfMany Innovative Wireless Services, Technologies, And Applications, Including The Current Air-Ground Communications System For more than a quarter century, Qualcomm has pioneered the development ofmany innovative wireless technologies. As the FCC knows, the company invented the Code Division Multiple Access ("CDMA") -based cellular communications technology, which is used in the U.S. and many other countries around the world for terrestrial wireless voice and broadband communications and countless mobile broadband products and services. The current Aircell air- ground system that operates in the 850 MHz band was designed by Qualcomm and uses the company's CDMA technology. Qualcomm also has developed Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access ("OFDMA") -based cellular technologies (e.g., LTE) that power the next- generation terrestrial mobile broadband networks operated by wireless carriers throughout the U.S. and around the world. Qualcomm is continuously innovating in the wireless space. Qualcomm has invested more than $16.0 billion in R&D ofwireless technologies since the company's founding in 1985. In fiscal 2010 alone, Qualcomm spent $2.55 billion, or 23% ofits revenues, on R&D ofa wide range ofadvanced wireless technologies. These enormous expenditures have enabled Qualcomm to invent many ofthe technologies fueling the exponential growth in mobile broadband usage. And, through its Technology Licensing ("QTL") business unit, Qualcomm broadly licenses its technology to more than 180 handset and infrastructure manufacturers worldwide that make network equipment, handsets and other consumer devices, and develop mobile services and applications for cellular networks based on 3G and 4G technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 20: Height Finding and 3D Radar
    CHAPTER 20 HEIGHT FINDING AND 3D RADAR David J. Murrow General Electric Company 20.1 HEIGHTFINDINGRADARSAND TECHNIQUES Early Radar Techniques for Height Finding. Early radar techniques em- ployed to find target height were classified according to whether or not the earth's surface was used in the measurement. The practice of using the earth's surface for height finding was quite common in early radar because antenna and transmitter technologies were limited to lower radio frequencies and broad elevation beams. The first United States operational shipborne radar, later designated CXAM and developed in 1939 by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), used the range of first detection of a target to estimate its height, based on a knowledge of the shape of the pattern near the horizon due to the primary multipath null. Later a refinement was made as the target traversed the higher-elevation multipath nulls or "fades." This technique, illustrated in Fig. 20.1«, was extensively employed on early shipborne radars, where advantage could be taken of the highly reflective nature of the sea surface. Of course, the technique was limited in performance by such uncontrollable factors as sea state, atmospheric refraction, target radar cross section, and target maneuvers.1'2 Reflections from the earth's surface were also used by other early contempo- rary ground-based radars, such as the British Chain Home (CH) series, which was employed in World War II for the defense of Britain. This radar was a pulsed high-frequency (HF) radar which made height measurements by comparing am- plitudes of the (multipath-lobed) main beams of a pair of vertically mounted re- ceiving antennas.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast-Multicast Single Frequency Network Versus Unicast in Cellular Systems
    Broadcast-Multicast Single Frequency Network versus Unicast in Cellular Systems Juan Vargas∗ ,Cedric´ Thienot ∗, Christophe Burdinat ∗, Xavier Lagrange ∗Enensys Technologies, Rennes, France fjuan-carlos.vargas-rubio, cedric.thienot, [email protected] IMT Atlantique/IRISA, Rennes, France [email protected] Abstract—Video is an important factor of the load in cellular Release 10 introduced the eMBMS counting procedure. It networks due to the growing popularity of streaming and allows the network to count the number of users interested linear services. In unicast transmission mode, the same data is in an MBMS service in a given SFN area [4, Chapter 11]. transmitted as many times as the number of receivers demanding the same video content. Conversely, in broadcast transmissions Release 12 Introduced eMBMS operation on demand (MooD) using the Single Frequency Network (SFN) technique, a set of that allows automatic MBMS activation and deactivation. The base stations perform synchronized transmission of the same option to perform BC transmission in only one cell was waveform to a potentially infinite number of users. The objective presented in release 13 as Single-Cell Point-to-Multipoint (SC- of this study is to compare the performance of unicast and PTM) [5, Chapter 19]. Release 14 introduced Further evolved broadcast. More precisely, we determine the minimum number of users downloading the same data from which a broadcast MBMS (FeMBMS). It included a receive-only mode to allow transmission is more efficient than multiple unicast transmissions. devices without operator subscription to receive broadcast In this paper, a model to calculate the Signal-to-Interference-plus- content.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Antenna Structure Fundamentals
    CHAPTER 1 ANTENNA STRUCTURE FUNDAMENTALS Much of the world around us is affected by wave phenomena, which are often characterized by frequency (number of waves per unit of time) and wave length. Frequency and wave length are related by the speed with which waves propagate through the various media. For example, the speed of electromagnetic wave prOpag?itiOn hi free space is about 1.182 x 101° inches per second. Therefore the wave length for the frequency of 1 x 109 cycles per second (1 GHz) is 1.182 x 101°/ 1 x 109 or 11.8 inches (in metric units, the speed is about 3 x 10II mm per second, so that the wavelength at 1 GHz is about 300 mm ). The rule is that electromagnetic wavelengths are about 11.8 inches (300 mm) per GHz . The frequencies relevant to large-diameter antennas are in the microwave band of from 2 to 100 GHz, thus the wavelengths are from about 6 inches to 1/8 of an inch (150 mm to 3 mm). Microwave frequencies are higher than radio and television frequencies and are lower than the infrared, optical, and gamma ray frequencies at the progressively higher electromagnetic bands. The microwave antennas that are considered here have diameters of from as small as 10 meters to as large as 100 meters, and are used for a multitude of communications and radio astronomy applications from ground and space communications to deep space exploration. Microwave antennas require surface reflection accuracies of from one-twelfth to one-fiftieth of a wavelength. This means that the ratio of accuracy to structure size for microwave antennas greatly exceeds that of customary civil-engineered buildings or bridges.
    [Show full text]