Hawaii Maine Vt. N.H. N.J. Del. Conn. Md. Virginia North

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hawaii Maine Vt. N.H. N.J. Del. Conn. Md. Virginia North Note: Abbreviations at right National Park System National Forest System Bureau of Land Management are for federal lands shown on this map. In many places, Mount Baker exact trail locations have not NF yet been determined. Portions of the trails indicated on this MEM Memorial NP National Park NF National Forest North Okanogan map may not be accessible for NB National Battlefield N PRES National Preserve NG National Grassland Cascades NF public use. Please check with NHP National Historical Park NRA National Recreation Area NP Lake Chelan individual trail clubs and NHS National Historic Site NRR National Recreational River NRA managing offices for the latest NL National Lakeshore N RES National Reserve SEATTLE available trail locations. NM National Monument NS National Seashore Wenatchee N MEM National Memorial NSR National Scenic Riverway NF Glacier NMP National Military Park PKWY Parkway NP S OLYMPIA E T WASHINGTON A Fort Mount A D Snoqualmie T Clatsop Rainier A CANADA S NF Flathead N MEM NP N 90 D Lewis UNITED STATES A Gifford E Lolo Lake of C and T Pinchot 82 NF the Woods I Fort Clark Fort Union Trading N NF River Vancouver NF NF U ri Post NHS NHS Nez Perce GREAT Missou Colu PORTLAND mbi NHP MISSOULA FALLS a River Clearwater NORTH DAKOTA 84 NF SUPERIOR OREGON Lolo Lewis and Clark KE SALEM CITY Little LA Mount O NF HELENA r Chippewa e MAINE Hood NF R NF MONTANA v Knife River NF E i 5 Nez Perce Deer Lodge Helena R Missouri Indian Villages G NF NHS NO 95 O Wallowa Bitterroot NF R IONAL SCE IL N NF e BISMARCK T T N A Willamette n 94 FARGO H A IC TR AUGUSTA NF NF Big o NG L Gallatin Yellowst N NF E Whitman NF Hole C OU Ottawa Pictured NB NF W NTRY Rocks NL N Salmon NF VT. I R Hiawatha White Beaverhead S A BILLINGS 35 NS T NF x NF MONTPELIER Mountain Gallatin Sheyenne Croi I A t NF Deschutes O in Chequamegon L NF NF NG a A 89 PORTLAND Umpqua NF N NEZ PERCE (NEE-ME-POO) N S NF K IDAHO E 93 A D NF L Yellowstone NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL OREGON C WISCONSIN H Green Crater Lake U NP L CONCORD Rogue NP R Mountain H A 91 River AL O I R ICE N NF S Targhee 90 29 AGE TIO S NF NA N N.H. Winema BOISE T K ST. PAUL Sawtooth NF C 75 87 NF S O 15 SOUTH DAKOTA MINNEAPOLIS TARIO n NF 39 E ON a R Shoshone N M BOSTON k N E P e I i K SYRACUSE C NF A ss Lake A MASS. A i I L N Goose T ss C Winnebago Klamath C MINNESOTA i Manistee ALBANY 90 95 Teton PIERRE I p A ROCHESTER NF I Lake O p NF i T F T NF N G Finger I Caribou I NEW YORK PROVIDENCE C Modoc Hagerman Fossil R A 90 R Lakes C A NF 94 H Beds NM A HARTFORD C A I R r L BUFFALO 88 L ive C MICHIGAN 81 R L I I L Shasta E IF 86 Bridger H 90 L 43 I R.I. S NF I M 90 CONN. NF O NF WYOMING S Finger A T R Sawtooth T 69 R 84 CASPER O Lakes Lassen N NF R MADISON MILWAUKEE GRAND 96 T I Humboldt NF Curlew R LANSING NF 84 A City of I i RAPIDS NF C v 90 E IE Lassen Volcanic NG T e S ION Rocks R DETROIT R T A L A K A I IL r E a NP N L A N RES Cache 43 Allegheny A 196 c R Delaware Water Gap NRA r T NF 35 L E a H C 94 K NF m I I Missouri NR 94 NEW YORK Plumas 80 STOR M R 75 LA 79 e NF Great O 80 CITY n R IOWA 78 t N Pyramid Humboldt Salt Fort M 81 o CLEVELAND A 80 O CHICAGO Lake NF Lake Laramie N 80 C T NHS 90 TOLEDO PENNSYLVANIA I TRENTON Tahoe I P N R O Scotts 88 Wasatch IO AKRON E i Medicine N C v NF NEBRASKA 39 N Bluff NM E 80 S e NF E OMAHA 69 r A Bow NF Chimney R L N.J. SALT LAKE AI DES MOINES 75 PITTSBURGH HARRISBURG L Rock NHS NATIO R 71 PHILADELPHIA Eldorado CITY N e 76 A T tt River 65 95 NF CARSON Routt CHEYENNE L la COUNCIL BLUFFS 83 SACRAMENTO IONAL HISTO Utah Unita P ILLINOIS 77 CITY PO NAT RI NF Roosevelt H C NY EXPRESS C Lake NF NF IST RI OHIO r O 74 55 T e INDIANA Walker R L v Rocky MD. BALTIMORE Toiyabe AI i 80 68 Stanislaus Lake R Mountain LINCOLN Harpers 70 DOVER Toiyabe NF 76 NF NF NP NAUVOO COLUMBUS Chesapeake Ferry SAN FRANCISCO 29 ANNAPOLIS DEL. Golden Gate NRA S 25 70 and Ohio NHP C Mono n White Arapaho INDIANAPOLIS Canal NHP 66 WASHINGTON, D.C. NEVADA e Yosemite E Lake Humboldt e 70 NF DENVER 72 George UTAH r SPRINGFIELD Wayne San N WEST NP G 74 River 57 Washington I NF ST. JOSEPH Shenandoah C CINCINNATI NF Memorial J Devils Postpile NP o NF Pike VIRGINIA PKWY 5 a NM M L q r Inyo NF 79 81 e 70 KANSAS CITY is 65 George A POTOMAC HERITAGE u iv Sierra s in R NF o O Washington NF u hio r CHARLESTON N 64 NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL T COLORADO r Rive i NF O Kings Gunnison KANSAS I Los R San 70 71 64 RICHMOND Canyon T Padres A TOPEKA River NF INDEPENDENCE 64 A NP I Isabel IL FRANKFORT L A NF Sequoia TR ST. LOUIS Jefferson N VIRGINIA IC JEFFERSON CITY Jefferson National NORFOLK NP NF Bent’s Old ISTOR LOUISVILLE NF S H 55 Expansion MEM 64 Rio Fort NHS ANTA L San FE N NA 135 Y CALIFORNIA A ATIO MISSOURI rkan W Juan Grande sas R Fort Larned 35 HISTORIC N 85 15 ive ONAL Shawnee KENTUCKY A K Sequoia LAS r NHS TI I P J NF T VEGAS DURANGO Comanche A R NF H U NF 77 NF NG N A C e A r I 24 75 ABINGDON g Rive WICHITA S L A id N IL R Mark Twain L R Los o A d A A P e NORTH CAROLINA a Cimarron E Padres r R T NF Cherokee P lu o T Carson NF 25 B RALEIGH B l NG NF A 40 A NF o F 81 U C O T Morgantown I Angeles 44 TENNESSEE S C L ARIZONA Fort Union I TA NF I Kiowa NASHVILLE Great Smoky OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY N NM A Pisgah E Santa Fe NF NG Mountains NP NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL C R Santa Monica DE S TULSA NF T CHARLOTTE Mountains NRA SANTA FE n River W LOS A dia hi Cherokee N Cibola na te r Kings Mountain ANGELES Z San L Pecos a e NF Nantahala Cowpens 95 40 NF C v NMP A Bernardino A NHP TAHLEQUAH i 40 IL NF NB N R 24 CHATTANOOGA NF 40 A 65 O OKLAHOMA CITY ARKANSAS R Chattahochee I ALBUQUERQUE El Malpais R T 85 N T i NF 5 A NM Fort Smith v e MEMPHIS S T 17 A NHS A a SOUTH CAROLINA 10 r Salton rk LITTLE v I N a C Cleveland O n I 59 a Sea 44 sa ROCK i Tennessee n COLUMBIA NF N s N R n p E iv a 27 p er h A Cibola i 20 PACIFIC PHOENIX E ) SAN s C 26 L Apache NF Y D OKLAHOMA s S i DIEGO I I TRA L s W ATLANTA HIS s T V ORIC NF i K R I NEW MEXICO L P iv OCEAN 8 R M e D iv 55 A er e 20 r r c CHARLESTON e N a Gila v r 75 i O 30 T BIRMINGHAM 85 NF R I L GEORGIA UNITED STATES T z A 35 e 25 A h T s c o N t N MEXICO TUCSON c a E e ALABAMA 16 N P R Saguaro N E s I FT e C w NP d 19 T 10 o SELMA WORTH DALLAS A ll ATLANTIC Coronado NF N R o MONTGOMERY T (f O 20 Tumacacori 20 R r C iv Z e NHP EL PASO e JACKSON E v r i SELMA TO MONTGOMERY OCEAN H R C 59 NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL T a A m N a 49 NATCHEZ b 65 a B l MISSISSIPPI A r TEXAS a TRA z RID IL JACKSONVILLE o 45 LO A 10 TALLAHASSEE C R s F I i N N o AT E Osceola G IO C R NA S NF r i L a v BATON e PENSACOLA n 10 r ROUGE d 12 e LOUISIANA Apalachicola 95 ARCTIC NF FLORIDA AUSTIN Gulf Islands NS OCEAN 10 Ocala BEAUFORT SEA NF HOUSTON NEW ORLEANS 75 ORLANDO SAN ANTONIO 4 TAMPA 35 ST. PETERSBURG 37 Lake Okeechobee er Riv UNITED STATES GULF OF MEXICO NOME IDITAR ALASKA OD N kon CANADA A Yu T IO BERING SEA N FAIRBANKS Big MIAMI A L Cypress H N PRES IS T O R IC Alaska TR Hawaii A IL Kauai ANCHORAGE Chugach PACIFIC OCEAN NF Niihau Oahu HONOLULU SEWARD HAWAII Molokai GULF OF ALASKA JUNEAU Maui North PACIFIC OCEAN Hawaii Scale for all areas except Alaska 0 200 400 Kilometers 0100200 Kilometers 0200 400 Miles 0 100 200 Miles.
Recommended publications
  • Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Colorado
    STUDENT GRIEVANCE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR INDIVIDUAL STATES ALABAMA DELAWARE Alabama Commission on Higher Delaware Department of Education Education Telephone: (302) 735‐‐‐4000 Telephone: (334) 242‐‐‐1998 Fax: (302) 739‐‐‐4654 Fax: (334) 242‐‐‐0268 General Link: http://www.doe.k12.de.us/ General Link: http://www.ache.state.al.us/ FLORIDA ALASKA Florida Department of Education Alaska Commission on Telephone: (850) 245‐‐‐0505 Postsecondary Fax: (850) 245‐‐‐9667 Education Student Grievance Procedure Telephone: (907) 465‐‐‐2962 GEORGIA Fax: (907) 465‐‐‐5316 Nonpublic Postsecondary Education General Link: Commission http://akadvantage.alaska.gov/ Telephone: 770‐‐‐414‐‐‐3300 ARIZONA Fax: 770‐‐‐414‐‐‐3309 Arizona State Board for Private Student Grievance Procedure Postsecondary HAWAII Education Department of Commerce and Telephone: (602) 542‐‐‐5709 Consumer Fax: (602) 542‐‐‐1253 Affairs Student Grievance Procedure Telephone: (808) 933‐‐‐0910 ARKANSAS Fax: (808) 933‐‐‐8845 Arkansas Department of Higher Student Grievance Procedure Education IDAHO Telephone: (501) 371‐‐‐2000 Idaho Board of Education Email: [email protected] Telephone: (208) 334‐‐‐2270 Student Grievance Procedure Fax: (208) 334‐‐‐2632 COLORADO Student Grievance Procedure (Page 8) Colorado Department of Higher ILLINOIS Education Illinois Board of Higher Education Telephone: (303) 866‐‐‐2723 Telephone: (217) 782‐‐‐2551 Fax: (303) 866‐‐‐4266 Fax: (217) 782‐‐‐8548 Student Grievance Procedure Student Grievance Procedure CONNECTICUT INDIANA Connecticut Board of Regents for Indiana Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Americana Hawaii (Please See the Nightly Rates
    Americana RESORT ADDRESS The Legacy Golf Resort The Legacy Golf Resort 6808 South 32nd Street | Phoenix, AZ 85042 Orange Tree Resort 10601 North 56th Street | Scottsdale, AZ 85254 Starr Pass Golf Suites 3645 West Starr Pass Boulevard | Tucson, AZ 85745 Crotched Mountain Resort 740 2nd NH Turnpike North | Francestown, NH 03043 Foxhunt at Sapphire Valley 127 Cherokee Trail | Sapphire, NC 28774 Hawaii (Please see the nightly rates) RESORT ADDRESS Holua Resort at the Mauna Loa 78‐7190 Kaleiopapa Street | Kailua‐Kona, Big Island, HI 96740 Village Kona Coast Resort 78‐6842 Ali'I Drive | Kailua‐Kona, Big Island, HI 96740 Paniolo Greens 68‐1745 Waikoloa Road | Waikoloa, Big Island, HI 96738 The Cliffs Club 3811 Edward Road | Princeville, Kauai, HI 96722 Kauai Coast Resort at the Beachboy 520 Aleka Loop | Kapaa, HI 96746 Lawai Beach Resort 5017 Lawai Road | Koloa, HI 96756 Waikiki Marina Resort at the Ilikai 1777 Ala Moana Blvd., Suite 212 | Honolulu, HI 96815 West RESORT ADDRESS Peacock Suites 1745 S. Anaheim Blvd. | Anaheim, CA 92805 Inn at the Park 525 Spruce Street | San Diego, CA 92103 Inn at the Opera 333 Fulton Street | San Francisco, CA 94102 The Donatello 501 Post Street | San Francisco, CA 94102 The Suites at Fisherman's Wharf 2655 Hyde Street | San Francisco, CA 94102 Desert Rose Resort ® 5051 Duke Ellington Way | Las Vegas, NV 89119 Pacific RESORT ADDRESS Mountainside Lodge 4417 Sundial Place | Whistler, B.C. V8E 0M8 CANADA Affiliates RESORT ADDRESS Carriage Hills Resort 90 Highland Drive | Oro Medonte, ON L0L 2L0 CANADA Carriage Ridge Resort 90 Highland Drive | Oro Medonte, ON L0L 2L0 CANADA Plaza Pelicanos Grand Beach Resort Jose Clemente Orozco 131 | Zona Hotelera Las Glorias, Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, MEXICO Sunset Plaza Beach Resort & Spa Diego Rivera 120 | Zona Hotelera Las Glorias, Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, MEXICO .
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Benefits of Hawaii's Tourism Economy
    Fact Sheet: Benefits of Hawai‘i’s Tourism Economy Hawai‘i Tourism Industry in 20191 Tourism is the largest single source of private capital for Hawai‘i’s economy. In 2019, Hawai‘i’s tourism economy has recorded. Visitor Spending: $17.75 billion (+1.4%, +$244.4 million YOY versus 20182). Statewide: $48.6 million in average visitor spending daily: • O‘ahu: $22.4 million per day • Maui: $14.0 million per day • Island of Hawai‘i: $6.4 million per day • Kaua‘i: $5.2 million per day State Tax Revenue: $2.07 billion (+1.4%,+$28.5 million YOY versus 2018). Visitor Arrivals: 10,424,995 (+5.4% YOY versus 2018). On any given day were 249,000 visitors in the Hawaiian Islands. Jobs supported: 216,000 Air Seats: 13,619,349 (+2.9% YOY versus 2018). Opportunities for Continued Growth Increased arrivals during shoulder periods: April-May and October-November. Renovations, upgrades to Hawai‘i’s tourism product (hotels, attractions, natural resources). Increased distribution of visitors to the neighbor islands. TAT Collections FY 2018 TAT Distribution FY 2019 TAT Distribution ($ millions) ($ millions) Convention Convention Center Enterprise Center Enterprise Special Fund, Special Fund, Tourism $16.5 Tourism Special $26.5 Special Fund, Department of Fund, $82.0 $79.0 Land and Natural Department of Resources, Land and Natural $3.0 Resources, General Fund, $3.0 General Fund, Counties, $103.0 $315.2 Counties, $103.0 $340.0 Turtle Bay Conservation Turtle Bay Easement Conservation Fund, $1.5 Easement Fund, $1.5 Mass Transit Mass Transit Special Fund, Special Fund, $23.6 $57.4 FY 2017: The state collected $508.38 million in transient accommodations tax (TAT=9.25%).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Hawaii Reefs
    11 Geology of Hawaii Reefs Charles H. Fletcher, Chris Bochicchio, Chris L. Conger, Mary S. Engels, Eden J. Feirstein, Neil Frazer, Craig R. Glenn, Richard W. Grigg, Eric E. Grossman, Jodi N. Harney, Ebitari Isoun, Colin V. Murray-Wallace, John J. Rooney, Ken H. Rubin, Clark E. Sherman, and Sean Vitousek 11.1 Geologic Framework The eight main islands in the state: Hawaii, Maui, Kahoolawe , Lanai , Molokai , Oahu , Kauai , of the Hawaii Islands and Niihau , make up 99% of the land area of the Hawaii Archipelago. The remainder comprises 11.1.1 Introduction 124 small volcanic and carbonate islets offshore The Hawaii hot spot lies in the mantle under, or of the main islands, and to the northwest. Each just to the south of, the Big Island of Hawaii. Two main island is the top of one or more massive active subaerial volcanoes and one active submarine shield volcanoes (named after their long low pro- volcano reveal its productivity. Centrally located on file like a warriors shield) extending thousands of the Pacific Plate, the hot spot is the source of the meters to the seafloor below. Mauna Kea , on the Hawaii Island Archipelago and its northern arm, the island of Hawaii, stands 4,200 m above sea level Emperor Seamount Chain (Fig. 11.1). and 9,450 m from seafloor to summit, taller than This system of high volcanic islands and asso- any other mountain on Earth from base to peak. ciated reefs, banks, atolls, sandy shoals, and Mauna Loa , the “long” mountain, is the most seamounts spans over 30° of latitude across the massive single topographic feature on the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • Overseas Expansion: Global Competition Over Resources and Power Led to American Expansion and Creating a Pacific Influence Empire
    Name __________________________________ Date _____________ S. S. 8 Statement of Inquiry Overseas Expansion: Global competition over resources and power led to American expansion and Creating a Pacific influence Empire ALASKA Prior to 1860, the Russians had a profitable seal and sea otter fur industry established off the coast of Alaska. After 1860, however, the Russians had killed off most of the furbearing animals. Russian interest in Alaska began to decline and the Russian government was looking to sell the land. In 1867, Russia offered to sell Alaska to the United States for $7.2 million. Secretary of State William Seward (under President Andrew Johnson) was interested in this offer. He argued that it was a great value at only 2 cents per acre and could provide natural resources such as fish, lumber, and minerals. It would also give the United States important seaports for dominating trade in the Pacific. Seward argued that if the United States did not purchase Alaska, another powerful nation would. However, some Americans objected to the purchase. They said that Alaska was a worthless wasteland. They called Alaska “Seward’s Icebox,” the “Polar Bear Garden” and “Seward’s Folly.” (folly=foolish) Others argued that the United States had no right to buy “outside territory,” land not connected to the United States. Seward finally won out. In April 1867, the United States agreed to purchase Alaska from the Russians. As a result of the purchase, the United States added about 600,000 square miles of land to its territory for only $7,200,000. Many Americans realized that this purchase was no mistake.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Population Trends of Hawaii's Native
    Wilson Bull., 105(l), 1993, pp. 142-158 STATUS AND POPULATION TRENDS OF HAWAIIS’ NATIVE WATERBIRDS, 1977-1987 ANDREW ENGILIS, JR. ’ AND THANE K. PRATT* ABSTRACT.- Status and population trends of Hawaiis’ native waterbirds were examined from 1977 through 1987. Waterbird population fluctuations were analyzed in relation to rainfall and land use dynamics. Numbers of Hawaiian Duck (Koloa) (Anus wyvilliana) and Hawaiian Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropussandvicensis) appeared stable over time; however, surveys were limited. Increase in Black-crowned Night-Heron (Nycticoruxnyctic- orux) abundance appeared linked to expansion of aquaculture, particularly on Oahu, and not to climatic events. Annual rainfall patterns help explain and predict population fluc- tuations and anomalous distribution patterns involving Hawaiian American Coots (Fulica americana alai), moorhens, and Hawaiian Black-necked Stilts (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni).Coot, stilt, and moorhen populations fluctuated with climatic events, and intra- island dispersal to ephemeral wetlands occurred. Stilts exhibited regular inter-island migra- tory behavior, but coots dispersed in relation to major rainfall events. Seasonal fluctuation recorded for coots by past observers is the result of survey techniques not accounting for seasonal dispersal patterns. Received10 Jan. 1992, accepted28 Sept. 1992. The Hawaiian Islands probably have lost, as a result of human activity, more species of birds than any other locality in the world. Extinctions during the first 2000 years of human habitation (Olson and James 1982a) resulted in the loss of 50% of native avian species. Unfortunately this process has accelerated during the past 200 years, and of the remaining 40 endemic species, 70% currently are endangered. Recognizing these trends, resource managers and conservation organizations have attempted to develop and implement essential habitat inventories and management programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine ENERGY SECTOR RISK PROFILE
    State of Maine ENERGY SECTOR RISK PROFILE This State Energy Risk Profile examines the relative magnitude of the risks that the State of Maine’s energy infrastructure routinely encounters in comparison with the probable impacts. Natural and man-made hazards with the potential to cause disruption of the energy infrastructure are identified. The Risk Profile highlights risk considerations relating to the electric, petroleum and natural gas infrastructures to become more aware of risks to these energy systems and assets. MAINE STATE FACTS State Overview Annual Energy Production Population: 1.33 million (<1% total U.S.) Electric Power Generation: 14.4 TWh (<1% total U.S.) Housing Units: 0.72 million (1% total U.S.) Coal: 0 TWh, <1% [0.1 GW total capacity] Business Establishments: 0.04 million (1% total U.S.) Petroleum: 0.1 TWh, <1% [1 GW total capacity] Natural Gas: 6 TWh, 42% [1.9 GW total capacity] Nuclear: 0 TWh, 0% [0 GW total capacity] Annual Energy Consumption Hydro: 3.7 TWh, 26% [0.7 GW total capacity] Electric Power: 11.6 TWh (<1% total U.S.) Other Renewable: 0.9 TWh, 6% [1 GW total capacity] Coal: 0 MSTN (0% total U.S.) Natural Gas: 413 Bcf (2% total U.S.) Coal: 0 MSTN (0% total U.S.) Motor Gasoline: 16,100 Mbarrels (1% total U.S.) Natural Gas: 0 Bcf (0% total U.S.) Distillate Fuel: 10,800 Mbarrels (1% total U.S.) Crude Oil: 0 Mbarrels (0% total U.S.) Ethanol: 0 Mbarrels (0% total U.S.) NATURAL HAZARDS OVERVIEW Annual Frequency of Occurrence of Natural Hazards in Maine Annualized Property Loss due to Natural Hazards in Maine (1996–2014) (1996–2014) ❱ According to NOAA, the most common natural hazard in Maine ❱ As reported by NOAA, the natural hazard in Maine that caused the is Thunderstorm & Lightning, which occurs once every 9.5 days greatest overall property loss during 1996 to 2014 is Winter Storm & on the average during the months of March to October.
    [Show full text]
  • Ustilaginales of Hawaii YR]O MAKINEN!
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Ustilaginales of Hawaii YR]O MAKINEN! THE SMUT FLORA of the Hawaiian Islands is restricted to my specimens, but even so I con­ relatively limited. Stevens (1925) reported only sider it important, as this point is too often two species, Sorosporium paspali and Sphace­ neglected in mycological collections. Most para­ lotheca monilifera, on native plants, and six sitic fungi have their own macroecological other species on introduced hosts. Parris (1938) requirements, which may be somewhat differ­ added one introduced host for Sorosporium ent from those of the host. Decreasing tempera­ paspali, two additional species, Ustilago bromi­ ture, correlated, for example, with elevation, is vora and U. zeae, on introduced plants, and (in one of the main macroecological factors for the 1939) one more species, U. tttriculosa. Later he parasites. mentioned an undetermined Ustilago species on Two abbreviations used in the lists of collec­ Cynodon dactylon (Parris, 1940:63 ). Petrak tions require explanation: M. = Y. Makinen; (1953) added one further collection of f.n. = field note without a preserved specimen. Graphiola phoenicis. This is all that has been written on the Hawaiian smut fungi. The pres­ LIST OF HAWAlIAN SPECIES ent paper adds two more native species, Farysia caricis-filicinae and Thecaphora mauritiana, nei­ Entyloma dactylidis (Pass.) Cif. ther apparently hitherto reported for the Pacific E. crastophilum SacCo area, and two more species on introduced hosts. On H olcus lanatus L. The following list is based partly on my own HAWAII: Kilauea (Stevens, 1925:127).
    [Show full text]
  • American Imperialism and the Annexation of Hawaii
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1933 American imperialism and the annexation of Hawaii Ruth Hazlitt The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hazlitt, Ruth, "American imperialism and the annexation of Hawaii" (1933). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1513. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1513 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AMERICAN IMPERIALISM AND THE ANNEXATION OF liAWAII by Ruth I. Hazlitt Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. State University of Montana 1933 Approved Chairman of Examining Committee Chairman of Graduate Committee UMI Number: EP34611 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI EP34611 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest' ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hawaii Ave NE
    CASE STUDY —KEY STATS— Square footage: Deep Efficiency, Deep Affordability: 70,349 square feet Unit count: One Hawaii Avenue NE, Washington, DC 70 units Unit size mix: a mix of studios, One Hawaii Avenue NE is a four-story, new construction affordable apartment one-bedrooms, building coming to the Fort Totten neighborhood in Northeast Washington, D.C two-bedrooms, and in mid-2020. Wesley Housing, a nonprofit affordable housing developer, plans three-bedrooms to develop, own, and operate the building. The development will replace an Parking and existing, 34-unit residential building on a triangular site nestled between Hawaii amenities: Avenue NE, Rock Creek Church Road NW, and Allison Street NE. For this 14 below-grade parking spaces, project, Wesley partnered with Steven Winter Associates and Bonstra | Haresign community room, Architects to explore the feasibility of achieving net-zero energy (NZE). indoor bicycle storage room, and shared outdoor gathering space Q&A WITH KAMILAH MCAFEE, WESLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Anticipated budget: $34,500,000 Capital sources: first How did the net-zero energy goal Which technologies will enable mortgage, benefit the project? One Hawaii Avenue NE to Low-Income Housing potentially achieve NZE? Tax Credit, D.C. Having NZE as a goal meant we all knew what Housing Production we were aiming for from the start. NZE is Our NZE technology includes rooftop solar Trust Fund, deferred something we will need to achieve in the not- generation, all electric systems (with the likely developer fee so-distant future in DC, so we stepped up to exception of a central gas domestic hot water the plate because we knew it could pay a lot of system), a variable refrigerant flow HVAC Targeted Site dividends.
    [Show full text]