Annual Report 5 4 Our Year in Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Revisiting Cyberfeminism
AUTHOR’S COPY | AUTORENEXEMPLAR Revisiting cyberfeminism SUSANNA PAASONEN E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In the early 1990s, cyberfeminism surfaced as an arena for critical analyses of the inter-connections of gender and new technology Ϫ especially so in the context of the internet, which was then emerging as something of a “mass-medium”. Scholars, activists and artists interested in media technol- ogy and its gendered underpinnings formed networks and groups. Conse- quently, they attached altering sets of meaning to the term cyberfeminism that ranged in their take on, and identifications with feminism. Cyberfemi- nist activities began to fade in the early 2000s and the term has since been used by some as synonymous with feminist studies of new media Ϫ yet much is also lost in such a conflation. This article investigates the histories of cyberfeminism from two interconnecting perspectives. First, it addresses the meanings of the prefix “cyber” in cyberfeminism. Second, it asks what kinds of critical and analytical positions cyberfeminist networks, events, projects and publications have entailed. Through these two perspectives, the article addresses the appeal and attraction of cyberfeminism and poses some tentative explanations for its appeal fading and for cyberfeminist activities being channelled into other networks and practiced under dif- ferent names. Keywords: cyberfeminism, gender, new technology, feminism, networks Introduction Generally speaking, cyberfeminism signifies feminist appropriation of information and computer technology (ICT) on a both practical and theoretical level. Critical analysis and rethinking of gendered power rela- tions related to digital technologies has been a mission of scholars but equally Ϫ and vocally Ϫ that of artists and activists, and those working in-between and across such categorizations. -
Plimack Mangold Selected Biography
1 2021 SYLVIA PLIMACK MANGOLD SELECTED BIOGRAPHY 1938 Born in New York 1956-1959 Cooper Union, New York 1959-1961 BFA, Yale University, New Haven, CT The artist lives and works in Washingtonville, NY AWARDS 1974 National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship 2006 Edwin P. Palmer Memorial Prize, National Academy Museum, New York 2009 William A. Paton Prize, National Academy Museum, New York Cooper Union President's Citation for Art, New York ONE-PERSON EXHIBITIONS 2021 Sylvia Plimack Mangold: The Pin Oak, 1985-2015, Krakow Witkin Gallery, Boston 2018 Sylvia Plimack Mangold: Winter Trees, Brooke Alexander, New York 2017 Summer and Winter, Alexander and Bonin, New York 2016 Sylvia Plimack Mangold: Floors and Rulers, 1967-76, Craig F. Starr Gallery, New York 2012-2013 Sylvia Plimack Mangold: Landscape and Trees, Norton Museum of Art, West Palm Beach, FL 2012 Recent Works, Alexander and Bonin, New York 2007 Sylvia Plimack Mangold, Alexander and Bonin, New York; Annemarie Verna Galerie, Zürich 2003 Sylvia Plimack Mangold: recent paintings and watercolors, Alexander and Bonin, New York 2000 Sylvia Plimack Mangold, Alexander and Bonin, New York 1999 Sylvia Plimack Mangold: Trees, Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 1997 New Paintings and Watercolors, Annemarie Verna Galerie, Zürich 1995 Sylvia Plimack Mangold, Paintings, 1990-1995, Brooke Alexander, New York 1994-1996 The Paintings of Sylvia Plimack Mangold, Albright-Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo, NY; Wadsworth Atheneum, Hartford, CT; Blaffer Art Museum, University of Houston; -
Dear Sister Artist: Activating Feminist Art Letters and Ephemera in the Archive
Article Dear Sister Artist: Activating Feminist Art Letters and Ephemera in the Archive Kathy Carbone ABSTRACT The 1970s Feminist Art movement continues to serve as fertile ground for contemporary feminist inquiry, knowledge sharing, and art practice. The CalArts Feminist Art Program (1971–1975) played an influential role in this movement and today, traces of the Feminist Art Program reside in the CalArts Institute Archives’ Feminist Art Materials Collection. Through a series of short interrelated archives stories, this paper explores some of the ways in which women responded to and engaged the Collection, especially a series of letters, for feminist projects at CalArts and the Women’s Art Library at Goldsmiths, University of London over the period of one year (2017–2018). The paper contemplates the archive as a conduit and locus for current day feminist identifications, meaning- making, exchange, and resistance and argues that activating and sharing—caring for—the archive’s feminist art histories is a crucial thing to be done: it is feminism-in-action that not only keeps this work on the table but it can also give strength and definition to being a feminist and an artist. Carbone, Kathy. “Dear Sister Artist,” in “Radical Empathy in Archival Practice,” eds. Elvia Arroyo- Ramirez, Jasmine Jones, Shannon O’Neill, and Holly Smith. Special issue, Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 3. ISSN: 2572-1364 INTRODUCTION The 1970s Feminist Art movement continues to serve as fertile ground for contemporary feminist inquiry, knowledge sharing, and art practice. The California Institute of the Arts (CalArts) Feminist Art Program, which ran from 1971 through 1975, played an influential role in this movement and today, traces and remains of this pioneering program reside in the CalArts Institute Archives’ Feminist Art Materials Collection (henceforth the “Collection”). -
A Finding Aid to the Lucy R. Lippard Papers, 1930S-2007, Bulk 1960-1990
A Finding Aid to the Lucy R. Lippard Papers, 1930s-2007, bulk 1960s-1990, in the Archives of American Art Stephanie L. Ashley and Catherine S. Gaines Funding for the processing of this collection was provided by the Terra Foundation for American Art 2014 May Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 4 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 6 Series 1: Biographical Material, circa 1960s-circa 1980s........................................ 6 Series 2: Correspondence, 1950s-2006.................................................................. 7 Series 3: Writings, 1930s-1990s........................................................................... -
“My Personal Is Not Political?” a Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy
Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2009 “My Personal Is Not Political?” A Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy Irina Aristarkhova and Faith Wilding This is a dialogue between two scholars who discuss art, feminism, and pedagogy. While Irina Aristarkhova proposes “active distancing” and “strategic withdrawal of personal politics” as two performative strategies to deal with various stereotypes of women's art among students, Faith Wilding responds with an overview of art school’s curricular within a wider context of Feminist Art Movement and the radical questioning of art and pedagogy that the movement represents Using a concrete situation of teaching a women’s art class within an art school environment, this dialogue between Faith Wilding and Irina Aristakhova analyzes the challenges that such teaching represents within a wider cultural and historical context of women, art, and feminist performance pedagogy. Faith Wilding has been a prominent figure in the feminist art movement from the early 1970s, as a member of the California Arts Institute’s Feminist Art Program, Womanhouse, and in the recent decade, a member of the SubRosa, a cyberfeminist art collective. Irina Aristarkhova, is coming from a different history to this conversation: generationally, politically and theoretically, she faces her position as being an outsider to these mostly North American and, to a lesser extent, Western European developments. The authors see their on-going dialogue of different experiences and ideas within feminism(s) as an opportunity to share strategies and knowledges towards a common goal of sustaining heterogeneity in a pedagogical setting. First, this conversation focuses on the performance of feminist pedagogy in relation to women’s art. -
WOMANHOUSE Intimacy, Identity and Domesticity
WOMANHOUSE Intimacy, Identity and Domesticity Susana Solís-Zara1 University of Sevilha 1. Introduction This text examines the issue of art and intimacy, and its strong connection with the concept of identity: and especially representations of female identity in the collaborative feminist art installation, perfor- mance space, exhibition and pedagogical project Womanhouse (Janu- art exhibition, coinciding with the foundation of feminist art criticism at the beginning of the seventies in the United States . The Project Womanhouse was a collaborative project that deals with women’s gender experiences within the context of a real house 1. Susana Solís-Zara https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9932-9452 Universidad de Sevilla Departamento de Educación Artística, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación Calle Pirotecnia s/n. CP. 41013 (Sevilla), Spain. [email protected] 298 Susana Solís-Zara setting in an urban neighbourhood in Los Angeles (http://www.wom- anhouse.net/). It presented and exhibited feminist artistic proposals concerning subjective identity, gender and intimacy like the ones found in domestic spaces. It includes perspectives such as the home as a space for both intimacy and identity, the body-house-home relationship, as- pects of maternity and the dichotomy between the private and the pub- lic, all of which continue to be narratives in contemporary women’s art. The main object of this essay is therefore to analyse the Woman- house project, as well as to examine some of its most prominent art- works and how intimacy was used as a means of expression, bringing - tion. It is precisely women who developed the notion of intimacy, as their role in history has been one of marginality and invisibility, being - WOMANHOUSE: Intimacy, Identity and Domesticity 299 2. -
SUZANNE LACY, FEMINISM and QUILTING by JACQUELINE
EVER PRESENT, NEVER PRESENTED: SUZANNE LACY, FEMINISM AND QUILTING by JACQUELINE WITKOWSKI B.A. (Hons), DePaul University, 2010 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Art History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2014 © Jacqueline Witkowski, 2014 Abstract Seated at tables of four, over four hundred women aged 55-95 years old unfold tablecloths of yellow, red, and black. With their choreographed and synchronized gesturing hands, they mimic traditional Euro-American quilt patterns. This performance, titled The Crystal Quilt, was produced by Los Angeles-based artist Suzanne Lacy in 1987 as the culminating work to the two- year long, statewide initiative Whisper Minnesota (1985-1987). There is a continued resonance of the quilt in Lacy’s oeuvre, as The Crystal Quilt was the third project to reference quilts and quilt making. The first project, Evalina and I: Crimes, Quilts, Art (1975-78), and a smaller commemorative project (1980), employed tactile quilting projects instead of the conceptual quilt arrangement that Lacy would incorporate in 1987. The formal and historical attributes of this textile practice have been largely ignored in contemporary scholarship on the artist, thus raising the question of how this very specific medium encouraged her artistic and activist agenda. The primary focus of this thesis is an exploration of how Lacy mediates these two approaches, one of feminism and the other inspired by conceptual artist Allan Kaprow, through the medium of the quilt. Neither Lacy’s quilt works nor the use of craft during the second wave feminist movement has been sufficiently analyzed within craft scholarship. -
In a Different Light Curated by Lawrence Rinder and Nayland Blake
In a Different Light Curated by Lawrence Rinder and Nayland Blake An Exhibition at the University of California, Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive January 11–April 9, 1995 bampfa.berkeley.edu Curating In a Different Light by Nayland Blake In 1991, I organized an exhibition with Pam Gregg for San Francisco's New Langton Arts called "Situation." It was a gathering of works by over thirty young gay and lesbian artists. For the most part these were artists whom I regarded as my peers, and the exhibition was conceived of as the third in a series of exhibitions, the Bay Area's contribution to a discussion that had included "Against Nature" in Los Angeles and "Erotophobia" in New York (The organizers of those exhibitions discuss their experiences and conclusions on pages 45-71 in this book.). When "Situation" was installed and had had its opening, I felt a sense of disappointment, not with the selection of artists or with the individual works, but with the entire emotional tone of the event. "Situation" felt more like an ending than a beginning. The two previous exhibitions had opened people's eyes to a new type of activity. "Situation" documented the fact that that activity had established itself in the art world and had found its voice. While that was good news, it was difficult to see where to go next, both in terms of a gay and lesbian dialogue, and my own curatorial practice. Thus, when Larry Rinder approached me about this exhibition, I reacted to the idea with a low level of interest if not outright hostility. -
Barbara-Zucker-CV-1.Pdf
Barbara Zucker Born, Philadelphia, PA. Lives and works in Burlington,Vermont, and New York, New York. Studio: 444 S. Union St. Burlington, Vermont 05401 802 863 8513 Fax: 802 864 5841 email: [email protected] Education University of Michigan, BS in Design Hunter College, MA Cranbrook Academy of Art Selected One Person Exhibitions Barbara Zucker: Time Signatures, The Gershman Y, Phila., Pa. 2007 Time Signatures: Tufts University, Mass., 2005 Universal Lines: Homage to Lilian Baker Carlisle and Other Women of Distinction”; Amy Tarrant Gallery, The Flynn Center for the Performing Arts, Burlington, Vt., 2001 Robert Hull Fleming Museum, Burlington, VT, 1998, 1980 One Great Jones Gallery, NYC, 1997 Paley Gallery, Moore College of Art, Phila., PA, 1996 (catalog) “For Beauty’s Sake,” Artists’ Space, NYC, 1994 Haeneh Kent Gallery, NYC, 1990 Webb and Parsons, Burlington, VT, 1989, 1991 Benjamin Mangel Gallery, Phila., PA, 1989 The Sculpture Center, NYC, April, 1989 Pam Adler Gallery, NYC, 1983, 1885 Swarthmore College, PA, 1983 Fine Arts Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1982 Joselyn Art Museum, Omaha, Nebraska, 1981 Robert Hull Fleming Museum, Burlington, VT, 1981 Robert Miller Gallery, NYC, 1978, 1980 Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Art, 1980 Marion Deson Gallery, Chicago, 1979, 1985 112 Greene Street Gallery, NYC, 1976 A.I.R. Gallery, NYC, 1972, 1974 Rutgers University, Douglass College, New Brunswick, NJ, 1973 Selected Group Exhibitions ‘Radical Lace and Subversive Knitting”, The Museum of Arts and Design, New York, 2007 “From the Inside Out: Feminist Art Then and Now”, New York, 2007 Winter Salon , Lesley Heller Gallery, December, New York, 2006 “Selfish“, curated by Lori Waxman, 128 Rivington, New York, 2004 Reading Between the Lines”, curated by Joyce Kozloff; Wooster Arts Space, New York, 2003 “Drawing Conclusions: Work by Artists Critics”, curated by Judith Collishan, New York Arts, New York, 2003 “The Art of Aging”, Hebrew Union College Museum, New York, 2003-2004; traveling exhibition, through 2006. -
Oral History Interview with Suzanne Lacy, 1990 Mar. 16-Sept. 27
Oral history interview with Suzanne Lacy, 1990 Mar. 16-Sept. 27 Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a tape-recorded interview with Suzanne Lacy on March 16, 1990. The interview took place in Berkeley, California, and was conducted by Moira Roth for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. This interview has been extensively edited for clarification by the artist, resulting in a document that departs significantly from the tape recording, but that results in a far more usable document than the original transcript. —Ed. Interview [ Tape 1, side A (30-minute tape sides)] MOIRA ROTH: March 16, 1990, Suzanne Lacy, interviewed by Moira Roth, Berkeley, California, for the Archives of American Art. Could we begin with your birth in Fresno? SUZANNE LACY: We could, except I wasn’t born in Fresno. [laughs] I was born in Wasco, California. Wasco is a farming community near Bakersfield in the San Joaquin Valley. There were about six thousand people in town. I was born in 1945 at the close of the war. My father [Larry Lacy—SL], who was in the military, came home about nine months after I was born. My brother was born two years after, and then fifteen years later I had a sister— one of those “accidental” midlife births. -
Partial Artist List: Nancy Angelo Jerri Allyn Leslie Belt Rita Mae Brown Kathleen Burg Elizabeth Canelake Velene Campbell Carol Chen Judy Chicago Clsuf Michelle T
Doin’ It in Public: Feminism and Art at the Woman’s Building October 1, 2011 – January 28, 2012 Ben Maltz Gallery, Otis College of Art and Design This exhibition presents artwork, graphic design, ephemera, and documentation of work by the artist collectives and individual artists/designers who participated in collaborative projects at the Woman’s Building in Los Angeles between 1973-1991. Artist Collectives/Projects: Ariadne: A Social Network, Feminist Art Workers, Incest Awareness Project, Lesbian Art Project, Mother Art, Natalie Barney Collective, Sisters of Survival, The Waitresses, Chrysalis: A magazine of Women’s Culture, and more. Partial artist list: Nancy Angelo Jerri Allyn Leslie Belt Rita Mae Brown Kathleen Burg Elizabeth Canelake Velene Campbell Carol Chen Judy Chicago Clsuf Michelle T. Clinton Hyunsook Cho Yreina Cervantez Candace Compton Jan Cook Juanita Cynthia Sheila Levrant de Bretteville Johanna Demetrakas Nelvatha Dunbar Mary Beth Edelson Marguerite Elliot Donna Farnsworth Anne Finger Audrey Flack As of 9-27-11 Amani Fliers Nancy Fried Patricia Gaines Josephina Gallardo Diane Gamboa Cristina Gannon Anne Gauldin Cheri Gaulke Anita Green Vanalyne Green Mary Bruns Gonenthal Kirsten Grimstad Chutney Gunderson Berry Brook Hallock Hella Hammid Harmony Hammond Gloria Hajduk Eloise Klein Healy Mary Linn Hughes Annette Hunt Sharon Immergluck Ruth E. Iskin Cyndi Kahn Maria Karras Susan E. King Laurel Klick Deborah Krall Christie Kruse Sheila Levrant de Bretteville Suzanne Lacy Leslie Labowitz-Starus Lili Lakich Linda Lopez Bia -
Fringe Natalie Baxter, Cynthia Carlson, Max Colby, Pamela Council, Amir H
Fringe Natalie Baxter, Cynthia Carlson, Max Colby, Pamela Council, Amir H. Fallah, Valerie Jaudon, Future Retrieval, Justine Hill, Judy Ledgerwood, Ree Morton, Josie Love Roebuck, Amanda Valdez July 8 - August 20, 2021 Denny Dimin Gallery is pleased to announce Fringe, a group exhibition featuring twelve artists at the gallery’s New York location, on view from July 8th to August 20th, 2021. Fringe was inspired by recent exhibitions of the Pattern and Decoration (P & D) art movement from the 1970s and its resonance and resurgence with many contemporary artists. The movement’s privileging of materials such as textiles and ceramics, its promotion of female artists and its interest in domestic space as a place for creativity, all connect it strongly to the concerns of contemporary artists half a century later. P & D exalted the artists, mediums, cultures, and aesthetics the then current artworld snubbed. It sought out what was on the periphery, on the fringe of mainstream and turned it on its head. The references to fabric design, quilting, stained glass, manuscripts, textiles, pottery, mosaics, embroidery and most non-Western Art, continue to proliferate in the works of contemporary artists and upend traditional art historical narratives. In her essay introducing a seminal exhibition on P & D, Anna Katz points out that it is not wholly satisfying to declare it an anti-minimalist movement, as there were many formal connections, such as an interest in architecture and in repetition and the grid. What was significantly challenged was instead the hierarchies of importance assigned to fine art over decorative art, and the significant codification of this in institutional and academic settings.