Pathways of Feminist Moveme
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Muqata`Ji System (1842–1861) 24 3 Grandeur and Misery of the Mutasarrifiya (1861–1915) 41 4 Beirut, Capital of Trade and Culture (1820–1918) 52
A History of Modern Lebanon Traboulsi T02610 00 pre 1 23/04/2012 08:07 Traboulsi T02610 00 pre 2 23/04/2012 08:07 A HISTORY OF MODERN LEBANON Second Edition Fawwaz Traboulsi Traboulsi T02610 00 pre 3 23/04/2012 08:07 First published 2007 Second edition published 2012 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA www.plutobooks.com Distributed in the United States of America exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan, a division of St. Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010 Copyright © Fawwaz Traboulsi 2007, 2012 The right of Fawwaz Traboulsi to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 0 7453 3274 1 Paperback Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data applied for This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental standards of the country of origin. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Designed and produced for Pluto Press by Chase Publishing Services Ltd Typeset from disk by Stanford DTP Services, Northampton, England Simultaneously printed digitally by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham, UK and Edwards Bros in the United States of America Traboulsi T02610 00 pre 4 23/04/2012 08:07 Contents List of Maps vi Preface vii Acknowledgements x PART I: OTTOMAN LEBANON 1 The Emirate of Mount -
Syria's Revolution
#3 February 2012 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from the Middle East SYRIA’S REVOLUTION SOCIETY, POWER, IDEOLOGY Published by the Heinrich Böll Stiftung 2011 This work is licensed under the conditions of a Creative Commons license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. You can download an electronic version online. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: Attribution - you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work); Noncommercial - you may not use this work for commercial purposes; No Derivative Works - you may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Editor-in-chief: Layla Al-Zubaidi Editors: Doreen Khoury, Mohammad Ali Atassi Layout: Catherine Coetzer, c2designs, Cédric Hofstetter Translator: Robin Moger Cover photograph: Mustafa Haid, Collage: Cedric Hofstetter Printed by: www.coloursps.com Opinions expressed in articles are those of their authors, and not HBS. The graffiti on the cover makes reference to an old Arab poem. It reads: 2011 - People Wanted Life. 2012 - Destiny will respond. Free Syria Heinrich Böll Foundation – Middle East The Heinrich Böll Foundation, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation. Our foremost task is civic education in Germany and abroad with the aim of promoting informed democratic opinion, socio-political commitment and mutual understanding. In addition, the Heinrich Böll Foundation supports artistic, cultural and scholarly projects, as well as cooperation in the development field. The political values of ecology, democracy, gender democracy, solidarity and non-violence are our chief points of reference. -
Michael Provence OTTOMAN MODERNITY
Int. J. Middle East Stud. 43 (2011), 205–225 doi:10.1017/S0020743811000031 Michael Provence OTTOMAN MODERNITY, COLONIALISM, AND INSURGENCY IN THE INTERWAR ARAB EAST Abstract The foundations of both Arab and Turkish nationalism lay in the late Ottoman mass education and conscription project and in the region-wide struggle against colonial rule in the 1920s and 1930s. The anticolonial insurgencies of the 1920s and 1930s have passed into history as the formative expressions of new nations: the Turkish War of Independence, the Iraqi revolt of 1920, the Syrian Battle of Maysalun, the Great Syrian Revolt, and the Palestinian uprisings of 1920, 1929, and 1936. But all insurgents of the 1920s had been Ottoman subjects, and many and probably most had been among the nearly three million men mobilized into the Ottoman army between 1914 and 1918. The Ottoman State, like all 19th-century European powers, had made mass education and conscription a centerpiece of policy in the decades before the Great War. Syria, Transjordan, and Palestine were governed justly as one country under the Ottoman State. The State of Syria was divided into three parts after the occupation. The mandate in all these countries [intends to weaken] the spirit of nationalism, kill the common Arab feeling, and plunder their wealth. It is certain they also intend to destroy the country and shed the blood of its people. We ask, “Did any year pass after the occupation without bloody revolutions where our blood was shed and our rights were swallowed?” —Friday Sermon at Nablus, 7 February 19361 In late 1935 a British patrol ambushed a small group of guerilla fighters in the hills near Jenin in the British Mandate for Palestine. -
Political Institutions and Social Structures in Syria from The
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library ROOTS OF DOMINATION: POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIAL STRUCTURES IN SYRIA FROM THE FRENCH MANDATE TO HAFIZ AL-ASAD by Benjamin James Smuin A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Middle East Studies – History Department of Languages and Literature University of Utah August 2011 Copyright © Benjamin James Smuin 2011 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Benjamin James Smuin has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Peter Sluglett , Chair 12 May 2011 Date Approved Peter von Sivers , Member 12 May 2011 Date Approved M. Hakan Yavuz , Member 12 May 2011 Date Approved and by Johanna Watzinger-Tharp , Chair of the Department of Middle East Center and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT The history of modern Syria is often divided into brief periods, relating to a specific topic, such as authoritarianism in the early years of independence, the emergence of nationalism after the end of World War I, and so on. This thesis is the end result of a careful reading and application of two particular assertions made by the late Albert Hourani, specifically that, as historians, we often divide up the past into somewhat perilous periodisiations; and that even if there were no ‘Syrian’ people, the Syrian lands would still be ripe with problems. -
Background Paper: Sixth Annual Conference for Historical Studies
Background Paper: Sixth Annual Conference for Historical Studies “The Arab Government in Damascus (1918–1920)” The Sixth Annual Conference for Historical Studies convened by the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies (ACRPS) will be held in Beirut in April 2019. Participants at the 2019 Conference are invited to address the theme of the “Arab Government in Damascus from 1918 to 1920”. In the midst of great historical transformations unfolding and the demise of the Ottoman Empire, King Faisal’s government held out the promise of the construction of modern, national state in the Arab Mashreq. This period of transformation was part of an era of comprehensive global transformation from a world of empires to a world of independent states. The majority of other nationalist movements rising across the Ottoman world – from their emergence in the 19th century to the outbreak of World War I and the settlements that came in its wake – were able to achieve independence and resolve the national question. By contrast, the attempt by the Arab movement to achieve independence for Arabs and establish an independent state in the Levant in union with Iraq collided with Anglo-French colonial rivalries, struggles, divisions, and understandings, ultimately falling victim to those rivalries at a critical period of global change. This led to what can be termed the “Arab Issue”, described by Azmi Bishara as the Arabs’ inability to realize a national unity. This continues to be a pressing issue today; the “Arab Issue” makes itself felt as an Arab- wide cause, one which goes beyond the boundaries of the present-day Arab states.