DOCSLIB.ORG

November 1, 2011 To: Interested Parties Subject: NOTICE OF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November 1, 2011 To: Interested Parties Subject: NOTICE OF November 1, 2011 located along Modjeska Canyon Road, which runs southeast off of Santiago Canyon Road To: Interested Parties and is approximately 1 mi south of Williams Canyon Road. Subject: NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE Project Description: IRWD is proposing DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED replacement of the portable generators at SANTIAGO CANYON AREA BOOSTER each of the five BPS sites identified to PUMP STATION (BPS) PERMANENT improve the reliability of the water system GENERATORS PROJECT during power outages, particularly when the outages are caused by fires in the canyons. The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) is This Proposed Project would replace the proposing replacement of the existing portable portable generators at each of the sites with generators at five BPS sites with permanent permanent electrical emergency generators, electrical emergency generators set with a each set with a diesel engine and integral 24- diesel engine and integral 24-hour fuel storage hour fuel storage on a concrete pad. Four of set on a concrete pad. As the Lead Agency the five permanent generators would be under the California Environmental Quality contained within a concrete masonry unit Act (CEQA), the IRWD has prepared an (CMU) block wall for protection against Initial Study/Draft Mitigated Negative fires. Construction is anticipated to be phased Declaration (IS/MND) which evaluates the to allow work at no more than two sites at potential environmental effects of the any given time in order to minimize proposed project. disruption to local residents and avoid extended work stoppages at any individual Project Location: The Proposed Project site site. is located within the Santiago Canyon- Modjeska Canyon area within an Public Review Period: The IS/MND is being unincorporated portion of the County. The made available for public review for a period Proposed Project site is located within five of 30 days beginning November 2, 2011 and separate IRWD BPS sites. Three of the BPS concluding December 1, 2011. The electronic sites (Fleming BPS, Shaw BPS, and Read version of the IS/MND may be viewed at the BPS) are along Silverado Canyon Road, which following website address: runs east from Santiago Canyon Road. The http://www.irwd.com/environment/ceqa.html fourth site (Williams BPS) is located along Printed copies of the IS/MND are also Williams Canyon Road, which also runs east available for review at the Irvine Ranch Water from Santiago Canyon Road and is District Headquarters, located at 15600 Sand approximately 1 mile (mi) south of Silverado Canyon Avenue, Irvine, California 92618- Canyon Road. The fifth site (Manning BPS) is 3102. Comments on the IS/MND must be received in writing no later than 5:00 p.m., December 1, 2011 and sent to: Irvine Ranch Water District Attention: Christian Kessler 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, California 92618-3102 Comments may also be emailed to Christian Kessler at [email protected]. All comments received related to issues discussed in the IS/MND will be included in the final package that is forwarded to the Board of Directors for final consideration. Public Meeting: The Board will consider the adoption of the IS/MND and any comments received on the IS/MND, along with the proposed project at a regularly scheduled Board meeting to be held on December 12, 2011 at 5:00 p.m. at Irvine Ranch Water District Headquarters, located at 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue, Irvine, California 92618. All parties are welcome to attend and provide testimony as to the proposed project and/or the IS/MND. If you have any questions regarding the IS/MND, please contact Mr. Christian Kessler at (949) 453- 5441. The project site is not listed as a hazardous waste site under Government Code Section 65962.5. DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SANTIAGO CANYON AREA BOOSTER PUMP STATION PERMANENT GENERATORS PROJECT October 2011 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SANTIAGO CANYON AREA BOOSTER PUMP STATION PERMANENT GENERATORS PROJECT Submitted to: Christian Kessler Water Resources and Environmental Compliance Irvine Ranch Water District 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, California 92618 (949) 453-5300 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614-4731 (949) 553-0666 October 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE................................................................................................1-1 1.2 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY........................................................................1-2 1.3 EXISTING DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE..............................1-2 1.4 REVIEW OF THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION............................................................................................................1-3 1.5 PROJECT CONTACT PERSONS.................................................................................1-3 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 EXISTING SETTING ....................................................................................................2-1 2.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...............................................................................2-3 2.3 PROPOSED PROJECT..................................................................................................2-3 2.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES.............................................................................................2-22 2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS....................................................................................2-22 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM.............................................................................3-1 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST RESPONSES ............................................................................................................................4-1 4.1 AESTHETICS ................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES ..........................................................4-4 4.3 AIR QUALITY ..............................................................................................................4-6 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES......................................................................................4-13 4.5 CULTURAL/SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES ..................................................................4-18 4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS .............................................................................................4-21 4.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ............................................................................4-24 4.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ........................................................4-29 4.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .................................................................4-34 4.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING ...................................................................................4-40 4.11 MINERAL RESOURCES............................................................................................4-42 4.12 NOISE ..........................................................................................................................4-43 4.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING ................................................................................4-47 4.14 PUBLIC SERVICES ....................................................................................................4-48 4.15 RECREATION.............................................................................................................4-49 4.16 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION ......................................................................4-50 4.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS .....................................................................4-53 4.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE......................................................4-55 5.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................5-1 6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS.............................................................................................................6-1 6.1 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC...............................................................................................6-1 6.2 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT .........................................................................6-1 APPENDICES A: Air Quality Emissions Worksheets B: Biological Assessment C: Cultural Resources Report D: Environmental FirstSearch Report P:\IRW0901_P6\Draft PD and MND\IS-MND\IS-MND Oct 2011.doc «10/27/11» i FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 2.1: Project Location Map........................................................................................................2-2 Figure 2.2: Fleming Booster Pump Station Vicinity Map...................................................................2-4 Figure 2.3: Fleming Booster Pump Station Existing and Proposed Site Improvements .....................2-5 Figure 2.4: Shaw Booster Pump Station Vicinity Map .......................................................................2-8 Figure 2.5: Shaw Booster Pump Station Existing and Proposed Site Improvements..........................2-9 Figure 2.6: Read Booster Pump Station Vicinity Map......................................................................2-12
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ebird Top 100 Birding Hot Sots
    eBird Top 100 Birding Locations in Orange County 01 Huntington Central Park 02 San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary 03 Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve 04 Seal Beach NWR (restricted access) 05 Huntington Central Park – East 06 Bolsa Chica – walkbridge/inner bay 07 Huntington Central Park – West 08 William R. Mason Regional Park 09 Upper Newport Bay 10 Laguna Niguel Regional Park 11 Harriett M. Wieder Regional Park 12 Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve 13 Mile Square Regional Park 14 Irvine Regional Park 15 Peters Canyon Regional Park 16 Newport Back Bay 17 Talbert Nature Preserve 18 Upper Newport Bay – Back Bay Dr. 19 Yorba Regional Park 20 Crystal Cove State Park 21 Doheny State Beach 22 Bolsa Chica - Interpretive Center/Bolsa Bay 23 Upper Newport Bay – Back Bay Dr. parking lot 24 Bolsa Chica – Brightwater area 25 Carbon Canyon Regional Park 26 Santiago Oaks Regional Park 27 Upper Santa Ana River – Lincoln Ave. to Glassel St. 28 Huntington Central Park – Shipley Nature Center 29 Upper Santa Ana River – Lakeview Ave. to Imperial Hwy. 30 Craig Regional Park 31 Irvine Lake 32 Bolsa Chica – full tidal area 33 Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve – Muth Interpretive Center area 1 eBird Top 100 Birding Locations in Orange County 34 Upper Santa Ana River – Tustin Ave. to Lakeview Ave. 35 Fairview Park 36 Dana Point Harbor 37 San Joaquin Wildlife Area – Fledgling Loop Trail 38 Crystal Cove State Park – beach area 39 Ralph B. Clark Regional Park 40 Anaheim Coves Park (aka Burris Basin) 41 Villa Park Flood Control Basin 42 Aliso and Wood Canyons Wilderness Park 43 Upper Newport Bay – boardwalk 44 San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary – Tree Hill Trail 45 Starr Ranch 46 San Juan Creek mouth 47 Upper Newport Bay – Big Canyon 48 Santa Ana River mouth 49 Bolsa Chica State Beach 50 Crystal Cover State Park – El Moro 51 Riley Wilderness Park 52 Riverdale Park (ORA County) 53 Environmental Nature Center 54 Upper Santa Ana River – Taft Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Sec 05 11 Tribal and Cultural Resources
    Tribal and Cultural Resources 5.11 TRIBAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 5.11.1 PURPOSE This section identifies existing cultural (including historic and archeological resources), paleontological and tribal resources within the Study Area, and provides an analysis of potential impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update. Potential impacts are identified and mitigation measures to address potentially significant impacts are recommended, as necessary. This section is primarily based upon the Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Rancho Santa Margarita General Plan Update, Rancho Santa Margarita, Orange County, California (Cultural Study), and the Paleontological Resources Impact Assessment Report for the Rancho Santa Margarita General Plan Update, Orange County, California (Paleontological Assessment), both prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) and dated April 2019; refer to Appendix F, Cultural/ Paleontological Resources Assessment. 5.11.2 EXISTING REGULATORY SETTING Numerous laws and regulations require Federal, State, and local agencies to consider the effects a project may have on cultural resources. These laws and regulations establish a process for compliance, define the responsibilities of the various agencies proposing the action, and prescribe the relationship among other involved agencies (i.e., State Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation). The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, the California Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan of Trails, Adopted Oct
    P.O. BOX 8, SILVERADO, CA 92676 SMRPD Draft Master Plan of Trails, Adopted Oct. 14, 2004 The Master Plan of Regional Riding and Hiking Trails Component is countywide in scope. It is a public trail system which traverses the entire county without regard for jurisdictional boundaries and, therefore, intergovernmental coordination is necessary for successful implementation. -from the Recreation Element of the Orange County General Plan The Silverado Modjeska Community Plan and EIR (DEIR 096), prepared by the Environmental Planning Agency and distributed on November 23, 1976, included a variety of non-paved multi-use riding and hiking trails which were in place and inventoried at the time of the DEIR’s adoption. The plan allowed for the addition of recreational trails as proposed by the community. In 2002, under the jurisdiction of the Silverado Modjeska Recreation and Parks District (a State sanctioned Independent Special District), the community and the SMRPD worked together to create an updated Master Plan of Riding and Hiking Trails. As a conceptual plan, it is considered a general expression of community values and is abstract in nature. Purpose The purpose of the Silverado Modjeska Master Plan of Trails is to provide goals and objectives to direct the development and operation of a District-wide public trail system that serves the recreational needs of equestrians, pedestrians (walkers, hikers and joggers), and mountain bikers (non-motorized). Goals Goal 1: Provide a useful, enjoyable, safe, and efficient riding and hiking trail system for the District and to meet the needs and desires of the community. Goal 2: Create trail linkages between open space and recreation facilities, between community, municipal, state, and federal trail systems, and create connectivity to surrounding communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet
    MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY Jointly with the PLANNING & OPERATIONS COMMITTEE December 14, 2020, 8:30 a.m. Due to the spread of COVID-19 and as authorized by the Governor’s Executive Order, MWDOC will be holding all upcoming Board and Committee meetings by Zoom Webinar and will be available by either computer or telephone audio as follows: Computer Audio: You can join the Zoom meeting by clicking on the following link: https://zoom.us/j/8828665300 Telephone Audio: (669) 900 9128 fees may apply (877) 853 5247 Toll-free Webinar ID: 882 866 5300# P&O Committee: Staff: R. Hunter, J. Berg, V. Osborn, Director McVicker, Chair H. De La Torre, K. Davanaugh, Director Dick Director Yoo Schneider Ex Officio Member: Director Tamaribuchi MWDOC Committee meetings are noticed and held as joint meetings of the Committee and the entire Board of Directors and all members of the Board of Directors may attend and participate in the discussion. Each Committee has designated Committee members, and other members of the Board are designated alternate committee members. If less than a quorum of the full Board is in attendance, the Board meeting will be adjourned for lack of a quorum and the meeting will proceed as a meeting of the Committee with those Committee members and alternate members in attendance acting as the Committee. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Public comments on agenda items and items under the jurisdiction of the Committee should be made at this time. ITEMS RECEIVED TOO LATE TO BE AGENDIZED - Determine there is a need to take immediate action on item(s) and that the need for action came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Revisions Municipal Water District of Orange County Amended
    REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 18700 Ward Street, Fountain Valley, California December 16, 2020, 8:30 a.m. Due to the spread of COVID-19 and as authorized by the Governor’s Executive Order, MWDOC will be holding all upcoming Board and Committee meetings by Zoom Webinar and will be available by either computer or telephone audio as follows: Computer Audio: You can join the Zoom meeting by clicking on the following link: https://zoom.us/j/8828665300 Telephone Audio: (669) 900 9128 fees may apply (877) 853 5247 Toll-free Webinar ID: 882 866 5300# AGENDA MOMENT OF SILENCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS/PARTICIPATION At this time, members of the public will be given an opportunity to address the Board concerning items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. Members of the public may also address the Board about a particular Agenda item at the time it is considered by the Board and before action is taken. If the item is on the Consent Calendar, please inform the Board Secretary before action is taken on the Consent Calendar and the item will be removed for separate consideration. The Board requests, but does not require, that members of the public who want to address the Board complete a voluntary “Request to be Heard” form available from the Board Secretary prior to the meeting. ITEMS RECEIVED TOO LATE TO BE AGENDIZED Determine need and take action to agendize items(s) which arose subsequent to the posting of the Agenda. (ROLL CALL VOTE: Adoption of this recommendation requires a
    [Show full text]
  • Foothills Sentry January 2021
    *********ECRWSSEDDM**** Residential Customer The Best News In Town Since 1969 East Orange • Old Towne Orange • Orange Park Acres • Villa Park • Silverado/Modjeska Canyons • North Tustin A Monthly Community Newspaper January 2021 NEWS INSIDE RIGHT AND WRONG Respected nonprofi t scuttled by Old Towne design standards. See Ronald McDonald, page 2 FIRE ON THE MOUNTAIN As fl ames threaten a neighborhood, The Bond Fire started in a residence in the Cabinlands area of Silverado Canyon, Dec. 2. Accelerated by strong winds, it burned 6,686 acres, destroyed 31 structures and damaged 21 others. Photos by Paul Dixon residents pull together with hoses and heart. See Canyon Beat, New Orange Canyon residents rally to protect page 6 City Council each other against Bond Fire as members communication systems fail speak up By Tina Richards Canyon Watch to report gunfi re,” rounded the small community of A loud, insistent pounding on he says. When he looked out his houses behind the Silverado Café A CLEAN SEEP By Tina Richards the front door woke her up at 1:30 window, the hillside was lit up. on three sides. Residents wielded Local water district is The newly elected-by-district on the morning of Dec. 3. The He saw a ball of fi re. His neigh- garden hoses. “The fi re went up one of the fi rst to fi lter Orange City Council members hit knocking was accompanied by bor’s house was in fl ames. the hill from my house toward chemicals detected in the ground running during their shouts of, “There’s a fi re, we have The power had been shut off Williams Canyon,“ Dixon re- ground water.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Office Outlook
    Alford, Patrick From: Terry Welsh [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 6:36 AM To: Alford, Patrick Subject: Banning Ranch dEIR comments Attachments: Measure M council letter.pdf; EOC appendices.pdf; EOC priority conservation areas.pdf; EOC properties evaluation list and map.pdf "The comments below and all references contained therein are hereby incorporated into the official record of proceedings of this project and its successors." In 2009, the Banning Ranch Conservancy applied to the Measure M Environmental Oversight Committee (EOC), which is part of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for funds to be used for the purchase of the entire Banning Ranch. This request was supported by a unanimous vote by the NB City Council resulting in a letter of support. Following this application, the EOC evaluated the many open space project applicants, ranking them all. The EOC placed Banning Ranch in the highest category (Group 1) based on “high quality habitat, heterogeneous habitat, larger sized properties, aligns with impacted habitats, and contains covered species.” Furthermore, the EOC identified four “priority conservation areas” on the Banning Ranch mesa. Please review the Final Conservation Biology Report as well as the Acquisition Properties Evaluation List and Map. The dEIR needs to discuss an alternative that does not include development in the "priority conservation areas". 1 Acquisition Properties Evaluation (PCA and Non-PCA - Biological Criteria) Note: Property name with bolded, italicized, and underlined text are recommended for appraisal and/or acquisition consideration. Canyon Crest will be under consideration if deemed willing seller. Newport-Banning Ranch and The Hafen Estates both have recent appraisals and are recommended to be included in this subgroup for acquisition consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange County Historical Site Plaques
    ORANGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SITE PLAQUES The Orange County Historical Commission (OCHC) has designated sites and structures of local or countywide significance as Historical Sites. Descriptive bronze plaques have been placed at each of these sites by the Orange County Board of Supervisors and OCHC. Each site is listed along with the wording on its plaque. If you have any questions about these sites or would like to nominate a site for the OCHC plaque program, please call the OCHC office at (714) 973-6609 for more information. OC Parks-OCHC- Historic Programs 13042 Old Myford Rd. Irvine, CA 92602 www.ocparks.com PLAQUE CEREMONY #1. SITE OF CARBONDALE October 9, 1976 8002 Silverado Canyon Rd., Silverado, CA 92676 In 1881, after the Southern Pacific took over the Santa Clara Coal Mine northeast of here, a bustling mining camp complete with hotel, saloons, shacks, store, and post office sprang up on these flats. Three years later the mine played out and Carbondale disappeared without a trace. # 2. DOCTOR GEORGE CROOK CLARK HOME AND OFFICE November 3, 1976 Arboretum, California State University, Fullerton, CA Built in 1894 by Fullerton's pioneer physician on the original townsite of Fullerton. An excellent example of the Eastlake Style of Victorian architecture faithfully preserved and maintained as part of California's heritage by hundreds of volunteers. # 3. EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE MESSIAH November 7, 1976 614 N. Bush St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 Santa Ana's oldest assembly on its original site was completed on 1888 and dedicated Easter 1889. Consecrated by Bishop Joseph Johnson October 31, 1887, with Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Toad (Bufo Californicus (=Microscaphus))
    Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus (=microscaphus)) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Photo by permission of Will Flaxington U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California August 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus (=microscaphus)) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology Report for the 2007 Santiago Fire Cleveland National Forest
    Geology Report for the 2007 Santiago Fire Cleveland National Forest Resource Specialty: Geology Fire Name: Santiago, Cleveland National Forest Incident #: CA-ORC-068555 Month and Year: November, 2007 Author(s) Name and Home unit Name: Alan J. Gallegos, Sierra National Forest Thomas E. Koler, Ph.D., P.G., Eldorado National Forest Redacted Version Nov 28, 2007 This is a redacted version of this report. The treatment costs and addresses were removed from this report so bidding for any contracts for treatment implementation would not be influenced. The location of T & E species was removed to protect them from potential human disturbance. I. Potential Values at Risk (identified prior to the on-the-ground survey) Potential values at risk from geologic hazards (i.e., landslides, debris flows, and rockfalls) are the health and safety for people, residences, roads and bridges within the wildfire area. Of particular concern is the potential risk for loss of life and limb. All of these resources are located in the canyon floors and lower canyon walls of Harding Creek, Modjeska Canyon (Santiago Creek), Silverado Canyon and its tributaries (i.e., Pine and Halfway Creeks), and Morrow Trail Watershed. II. Resource Condition Assessment A. Resource Setting Geology The Santiago Fire is located in the Santa Ana Mountains, which is within the Peninsular Ranges Province. The fire area on National Forest System lands is underlain with rocks from the Bedford Canyon Formation, Santiago Peak Volcanics, Ladd Formation, and Trabruco Formation. The Bedford Canyon Formation (Jurrassic) is located throughout the upper slopes of the fire and is a slightly metamorphosed assemblage of interlayered argillite, slate, greywacke sandstone, quartzite and small masses of limestone.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Hills by Bradley Beylik Who Shall Gather the Smoke of The
    Behind the Hills By Bradley Beylik Who shall gather the smoke of the dead wood burning, Or behold the flowing years from the Sea returning? The days have gone down in the West, behind the hills into shadow. - J.R.R Tolkien, Lament for Eorl the Young Driving up ash-stained Silverado Canyon Road, three thousand evacuated residents of the Silverado area were making their way home. A week earlier, mandatory fire evacuations had turned them into refugees. Staring blankly out their car windows, they crossed the barricades that had kept them away. They were prepared to assess what had been lost in the fire. The hills that once preserved the look of ranch lands and riparian woodlands, the lost look of a more rural Orange County, were a dusty black. Here and there, short brown sage bushes stuck out of the soot blanket. Their leaves were singed away. Bundles of low, lobe-like cactus were melted like green plastic. All week, government investigators in navy blue t-shirts with block letters on the back— ATF, FBI, FEMA, OCFA—stood with bent backs, digging and sifting through the ash at the entrance to Silverado Canyon, looking for any clues that might lead to the capture of the arsonists. There were people from the forest service, local cops, and reporters. The officials all milled around, marking things with tape and talking to the reporters. A foreign force had invaded the secluded canyon community. *** Flames licked the dark sky. From the view looking east from Signal Peak in Newport Beach, the long north-south canyon called Santiago looked like a rift in the earth, ringed with the lumbering black shapes of the Santa Ana Mountains, spewing the earth’s innards skyward.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRESERVE at SAN JUAN Final Environmental Impact Report – EIR No
    THE PRESERVE AT SAN JUAN Final Environmental Impact Report – EIR No. 618 SCH # 2006051110 December 2017 OC Public Works, OC Development Services/Planning 300 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92703-5000 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Preserve at San Juan Final EIR Page 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Format of the Final EIR ............................................................................................1-1 1.3 CEQA Requirements Regarding Comments and Responses .................................1-2 2. Response to Comments ................................................................................................2-1 Letter 1: State Clearinghouse ...........................................................................................2-2 Letter 2: U.S. Fish and Wildlife .........................................................................................2-5 Letter 3: US Forest Service Cleveland National Forest Trabuco Ranger District ......... 2-12 Letter 4: California Department of Fish and Wildlife ..................................................... 2-19 Letter 5: California Department of Transportation ......................................................... 2-35 Letter 6: CalFire ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]