DOCSLIB.ORG

Cigar Lake Operation Northern Saskatchewan, Canada National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cigar Lake Operation Northern Saskatchewan, Canada National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report Cigar Lake Operation Northern Saskatchewan, Canada National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report Effective Date: December 31, 2015 Date of Technical Report: March 29, 2016 PREPARED FOR CAMECO CORPORATION BY: C. SCOTT BISHOP, P. ENG. ALAIN G. MAINVILLE, P. GEO. LESLIE D. YESNIK, P. ENG. Table of Contents 1 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Preamble .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Property tenure ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Location and site description ...................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Geology and mineralization ........................................................................................................ 3 1.6 Exploration of Cigar Lake deposit ............................................................................................... 4 1.7 Mineral resources and mineral reserves ..................................................................................... 4 1.8 Mining ......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.9 Processing .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.10 Environmental assessment and licensing ................................................................................... 10 1.11 Cigar Lake water inflow incidents and remediation .................................................................... 11 1.12 Current status of development ................................................................................................... 12 1.13 Production plan .......................................................................................................................... 12 1.14 Economic analysis and costs ..................................................................................................... 14 1.15 Mining and milling risks .............................................................................................................. 14 1.16 Conclusions and recommendations ........................................................................................... 14 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 18 2.1 Introduction and purpose ............................................................................................................ 18 2.2 Report basis ............................................................................................................................... 18 3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ............................................................................................. 20 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ....................................................................... 21 4.1 Location ...................................................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Mineral tenure ............................................................................................................................ 23 4.3 Surface tenure ............................................................................................................................ 25 4.4 Royalties ..................................................................................................................................... 27 4.5 Known environmental liabilities .................................................................................................. 27 4.6 Permitting ................................................................................................................................... 27 5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY .......................................................................... 28 5.1 Access ........................................................................................................................................ 28 5.2 Climate ....................................................................................................................................... 30 5.3 Physiography .............................................................................................................................. 30 5.4 Local resources .......................................................................................................................... 30 5.5 Mine and infrastructure ............................................................................................................... 31 i 6 HISTORY ............................................................................................................................................... 34 6.1 Ownership .................................................................................................................................. 34 6.2 Exploration and development history ......................................................................................... 35 6.3 Historical mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates ........................................................ 36 6.4 Historical production ................................................................................................................... 36 7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION .............................................................. 37 7.1 Regional geology ........................................................................................................................ 37 7.2 Local geology ............................................................................................................................. 37 7.3 Property geology ........................................................................................................................ 41 7.4 Mineralization ............................................................................................................................. 44 8 DEPOSIT TYPES .............................................................................................................................. 45 9 EXPLORATION ................................................................................................................................................... 46 9.1 AREVA 1980 – present .............................................................................................................. 46 9.2 Cameco 2007 – present ............................................................................................................. 51 10 DRILLING ............................................................................................................................................ 52 10.1 Surface drilling ............................................................................................................................ 52 10.2 Underground drilling ................................................................................................................... 57 10.3 Factors that could materially affect the accuracy of the results .................................................. 59 11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY .................................................. 60 11.1 Sample density and sampling methods ...................................................................................... 60 11.2 Core recovery ............................................................................................................................. 60 11.3 Sample quality and representativeness ...................................................................................... 61 11.4 Sample preparation by Cameco employees ............................................................................... 61 11.5 Sample preparation .................................................................................................................... 61 11.6 Assaying ..................................................................................................................................... 62 11.7 Radiometric surveying ................................................................................................................ 63 11.8 Density sampling ........................................................................................................................ 63 11.9 Quality assurance / quality control .............................................................................................. 64 11.10 Adequacy of sample preparation, assaying, QA/QC and security .............................................. 68 12 DATA VERIFICATION ..................................................................................................................... 70 13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ......................................... 71 13.1 Cigar Lake processing metallurgical test work ........................................................................... 71 13.2 McClean Lake processing metallurgical test work
Load more

Recommended publications
  • + 2020 Annual Information Form
    Denison Mines Corp. 2020 Annual Information Form March 26, 2021 ABOUT THIS ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM This annual information form (“AIF”) is dated March 26, Table of Contents 2021. Unless stated otherwise, all of the information in this AIF is stated as at December 31, 2020. About this AIF .................................... 1 About Denison ................................... 6 This AIF has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Developments over the Last Three securities laws and contains information regarding Years ................................................. 8 Denison’s history, business, mineral reserves and The Uranium Industry ........................ 17 resources, the regulatory environment in which Denison Mineral Resources and Reserves 24 does business, the risks that Denison faces and other Mineral Properties ............................. 27 important information for Shareholders. Athabasca Exploration: Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification ........... 102 This AIF incorporates by reference: Denison Operations ........................... 107 Manager of UPC ................................ 111 Denison’s management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2020, Denison Closed Mines Group ........... 112 Environmental, Health, Safety and Denison’s audited consolidated financial Sustainability Matters ........................ 112 statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, Government Regulation .................... 114 Risk Factors ...................................... 120 both of which
    [Show full text]
  • Project Management for Decommissioning of Hope Brook
    Uranium Development & Exploration The Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan July 2020 | Corporate Update Cautionary Statements & References This presentation and the information contained herein is designed to help you understand management’s current views, and may not be appropriate for other purposes. This presentation contains information relating to other companies and provincial infrastructure, and the plans and availability thereof, derived from third-party publications and reports which Denison believes are reliable but have not been independently verified by the Company. Certain information contained in this presentation constitutes “forward-looking information”, within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and similar Canadian legislation concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of Denison. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes”, or the negatives and / or variations of such words and phrases, or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur”, “be achieved” or “has the potential to”. In particular, this presentation contains forward-looking information pertaining to the results of, and estimates, assumptions and projections provided in, the PFS, including future development methods and plans, market prices, costs
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium in Saskatchewan
    Uranium in Saskatchewan Uranium in Saskatchewan Facts on the Industry for 2017 Attached are fact sheets containing information about the uranium industry in Saskatchewan, prepared by the Saskatchewan Mining Association. These fact sheets identify the companies, operations and projects involved in the uranium industry as well as the industry’s historical economic impact within the province. If you have any questions, please contact the appropriate person listed under Industry Contacts. If it is not clear whom you should contact, please call the media and public relations people listed. Uranium in Saskatchewan Introduction “Uranium in Saskatchewan” is a series of fact sheets produced annually by Saskatchewan’s uranium mining industry. The information contained has been gathered from corporations producing uranium in the province. The fact sheets represent the combined total of all efforts of the companies, their employees and contractors who produce this valuable source of energy used worldwide to generate electricity. Saskatchewan is a world leader in uranium production. The uranium industry provides many jobs and promotes investment and economic development in the province. The Saskatchewan uranium mining industry is one of the top employers of aboriginal people in Canada. The industry provides all of these benefits in an environmentally and socially responsible manner and is held accountable for its performance. Regular internal and external audits on the environment and safety of operations are ongoing and thousands of air, water and vegetation samples are taken annually. These samples demonstrate that the industry is protecting the environment. These fact sheets illustrate the magnitude of this industry and the benefits that accrue to the people of Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Uranium Fact Sheet
    Uranium in Saskatchewan Uranium in Saskatchewan Facts on the Industry for 2017 Attached are fact sheets containing information about the uranium industry in Saskatchewan, prepared by the Saskatchewan Mining Association. These fact sheets identify the companies, operations and projects involved in the uranium industry as well as the industry’s historical economic impact within the province. If you have any questions, please contact the appropriate person listed under Industry Contacts. If it is not clear whom you should contact, please call the media and public relations people listed. Uranium in Saskatchewan Introduction “Uranium in Saskatchewan” is a series of fact sheets produced annually by Saskatchewan’s uranium mining industry. The information contained has been gathered from corporations producing uranium in the province. The fact sheets represent the combined total of all efforts of the companies, their employees and contractors who produce this valuable source of energy used worldwide to generate electricity. Saskatchewan is a world leader in uranium production. The uranium industry provides many jobs and promotes investment and economic development in the province. The Saskatchewan uranium mining industry is one of the top employers of aboriginal people in Canada. The industry provides all of these benefits in an environmentally and socially responsible manner and is held accountable for its performance. Regular internal and external audits on the environment and safety of operations are ongoing and thousands of air, water and vegetation samples are taken annually. These samples demonstrate that the industry is protecting the environment. These fact sheets illustrate the magnitude of this industry and the benefits that accrue to the people of Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Z Lake Project Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan
    TSX-V: ISO OTCQX: ISENF IsoEnergy.ca 2Z Lake Project Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan Whitewater East N Whitewater Fond du Lac ATHABASCA Alberta BASIN Manitoba Fond Du Lac Uranium Deposit Stony Rapids Saskatchewan Saskatoon Regina Black Lake Directors Edge Collins Bay Leigh Curyer, Chairman Larocque East Extension Hurricane Zone Horizon Craig Parry, President and CEO Christopher McFadden Larocque West Richard Patricio Full Moon Trevor Thiele Hawk Geiger Radio Eagle Roughrider Eagle Pt. Management Midwest Lake McClean ATHABASCA BASIN Lake Collins Bay McClean Sue Trend Craig Parry, President and CEO North Thorburn Rabbit Lake Natona Bay Madison Steve Blower, VP Exploration Thorburn Lake Sand Clover Cigar Lake Lake Janine Richardson, CFO Thorburn Tower Trident Keith Bodnarchuk, Corp Dev Manager Carlson Creek West Bear 2Z Lake Andy Carmichael, Senior Geologist Paul Bay 905 Cable Justin Rodko, Project Geologist McArthur River Ranger East Rim Contact Gryphon Milennium IsoEnergy mineral tenure Keith Bodnarchuk, Corp Dev Manager Spruce Phoenix Active or depleted uranium mine Discovery or mineral deposit [email protected] Gemini Evergreen Uranium mill T +1 778 867 2631 Town Key Lake Roads Mine and Mill 40 km IsoEnergy Ltd. The 2Z project is located 30 kilometers southeast of Cigar Lake mine and 11 kilometers 970 – 1055 West Hastings St. southeast of Sand Lake uranium deposit. The project consists of four mineral claims to- Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 2E9 taling 354 hectares. The vertical depth to the unconformity is 60 to 100 meters. The Wolf
    [Show full text]
  • Denison Mines: 2020 Annual Report
    POWERING PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIPS AND PASSION 2020 Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANAYLSIS 3 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS 3 ABOUT DENISON 4 URANIUM INDUSTRY OVERVIEW 4 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 9 OUTLOOK FOR 2021 33 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 35 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 49 RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 51 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 52 ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 58 LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS A Year of Significant Project and Company De‐Risking March 23, 2021 Dear Shareholders, Confronted with the varied challenges of the pandemic, Denison’s resilient teams excelled in 2020 and early 2021 – accomplishing a significant de-risking of our flagship Wheeler River project and the Company’s balance sheet. At Wheeler River, our technical team achieved a key milestone, receiving an independent confirmation of ‘Proof of Concept’ for the application of the In-Situ Recovery (‘ISR’) mining method at the high-grade Phoenix deposit. We also completed an important trade-off study leading to the adoption of a freeze ‘wall’ design for containment of the ISR operation at Phoenix – a decision that is expected to be favourable from an environmental standpoint, reduce technical complexity and operational risks, allow for a phased mining approach with lower up-front capital costs, and strengthen project sustainability. With the Environmental Assessment process fully resumed and a $21.8 million budget (Denison’s share $19.4 million) approved and funded for evaluation and environmental assessment work at Wheeler River in 2021, the entire team is now focused on advancing Phoenix through the regulatory and community consultation process to support a future Feasibility Study (“FS”), with the objective of pairing Phoenix, the world’s highest grade undeveloped uranium deposit, with ISR mining, the world’s lowest cost uranium mining method.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameco Extends Production Suspension at Cigar Lake Mine and Withdraws Outlook
    TSX: CCO website: cameco.com NYSE: CCJ currency: Cdn (unless noted) 2121 – 11th Street West, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 1J3 Canada Tel: 306-956-6200 Fax: 306-956-6201 Cameco Extends Production Suspension at Cigar Lake Mine and Withdraws Outlook Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, April 13, 2020 . Cameco (TSX: CCO; NYSE: CCJ) announced today that it is extending the temporary production suspension at the Cigar Lake uranium mine in northern Saskatchewan as the effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic persist. Cameco announced on March 23 that the Cigar Lake operation was being placed in safe care and maintenance mode for four weeks, during which we would assess the status of the situation and determine whether to restart the mine or extend the production suspension. With the impact of COVID-19 continuing to escalate, we have determined that the Cigar Lake workforce will need to remain at its current reduced level for a longer duration. The precautions and restrictions put in place by the federal and provincial governments, the increasing significant concern among leaders in the remote isolated communities of northern Saskatchewan, and the challenges of maintaining the recommended physical distancing at fly-in/fly-out sites with a full workforce were critical factors Cameco considered in reaching this decision. Cameco will therefore keep the facility in safe care and maintenance for an indeterminate period. We will monitor the situation on a continual basis to determine when a safe, sustainable restart is possible. Cigar Lake ore is processed at Orano Canada Inc.’s McClean Lake mill, which is also presently in care and maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameco Corporation Cameco Corporation
    CMD 21-H6.6 File / dossier : 6.01.07 Date: 2021-08-16 Edocs: 6624597 Oral Presentation Exposé oral Written submission from Mémoire de Cameco Corporation Cameco Corporation In the Matter of the À l’égard de Orano Canada Inc., Orano Canada Inc., McClean Lake Operation Établissement minier de McClean Lake Application for licence amendment Demande de modification de permis pour for the expansion of the JEB Tailings l’agrandissement de l’installation de gestion Management Facility (TMF) at the des résidus (IGR) JEB à l’établissement de McClean Lake Operation McClean Lake Commission Public Hearing Audience publique de la Commission October 4, 2021 4 octobre 2021 Original CNSC Commission Member Document (CMD) Date Submitted: 16 08 2021 Reference CMDs: 2021-H-06 Cameco Corporation Public Hearing Scheduled for: October 4, 2021 McClean Lake Licence Amendment Regarding: Orano Canada Inc McClean Lake Licence Amendment Hearing Submitted by: Cameco Corporation McClean Lake Licence Amendment Hearing Date: October 4, 2021 Page 1 Introduction The McClean Lake mill operated by Orano Canada Inc. (Orano) has processed all uranium ore produced by the Cameco Corporation (Cameco) Cigar Lake mine (Cigar Lake) since production began in 2014. The tailings resulting from the milling of Cigar Lake ore are disposed of in the JEB tailings management facility (TMF) at McClean Lake. Orano is also a joint venture partner in the Cigar Lake operation and the two companies have worked together closely for nearly 40 years to develop the mine, prepare the mill to process the ore and effectively manage safety and environmental aspects of the two operations while engaging local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Cameco's Incidents
    TABLE OF CAMECO'S INCIDENTS Compiled by Dr Jim Green and Mara Bonacci – Friends of the Earth Australia Last updated: June 2017 Cameco is a uranium mining company based in Canada. This paper is posted at https://wiseinternational.org/nuclear-monitor/842/nuclear-monitor-842-26-april-2017 or: http://tinyurl.com/cameco-2017 "When you put the pieces together, they build a story of really fundamental issues about the competence of the company.'' − Prof. Christopher Barnes, geologist and Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission member, 2003 Date Location Description of Incident Sources 1981−89 Saskatche A total of 153 spills occurred at three uranium mines in Saskatchewan, MediaScan Canada 10/11/89; WISE Nuclear wan Canada from 1981 to 1989. Amoc Mining reported 62 spills, Cameco 48 and Monitor #323/324, 22/12/89 Key Lake 43. The spill totals were requested after Cameco's Rabbit Lake http://scott-ludlam.greensmps.org.au/let-the- mine reported a spill of two million litres of radium- and arsenic- facts-speak contaminated water. 1989 Rabbit In November 1989, around two million litres of radioactive and heavy metal Moody, R, 1992, The Gulliver File : Mines, People Lake, (radium, arsenic and nickel) -bearing fluids burst into Collins creek, which and Land ‒ A Global Battleground. Minewatch Canada itself flows into Wollaston Lake. The seepage occurred from a faulty valve on (London, UK), p.894. a 10 km long pipeline carrying runoff and seepage from the Collins Bay mine: loss of pressure in the pipe was recorded by monitoring equipment but not noticed until 14 hours after the rupture.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameco Suspending Production at Cigar Lake Mine
    TSX: CCO website: cameco.com NYSE: CCJ currency: Cdn (unless noted) 2121 – 11th Street West, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 1J3 Canada Tel: 306-956-6200 Fax: 306-956-6201 Cameco Suspending Production at Cigar Lake Mine Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, March 23, 2020 . Cameco (TSX: CCO; NYSE: CCJ) announced today that it is temporarily suspending production at its Cigar Lake uranium mine in northern Saskatchewan and placing the facility in safe care and maintenance mode due to the threat posed by the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. There are no confirmed cases of COVID-19 among Cameco’s workforce at the present time. The operation will be ramped down over the coming days and placed into care and maintenance for four weeks. During this time, Cameco will assess the status of the situation and determine whether to restart the mine or extend the care and maintenance period. Cigar Lake ore is processed at Orano Canada Inc.’s McClean Lake mill, also located in northern Saskatchewan. The decision to suspend production at Cameco’s Cigar Lake mine was made in conjunction with Orano to suspend production at their McClean Lake mill. As of March 21, 2020, total packaged production from these operations for 2020 was about 4 million pounds U3O8 (100% basis, Cameco’s share 50%). “We are in unprecedented and challenging times,” said Cameco President and CEO Tim Gitzel. “In the face of great uncertainty, our first priority is to protect the health and well-being of our employees, their families and their communities. Our leadership team took a measured approach and weighed many factors in assessing the situation both globally and locally to make this decision, which takes into account the specific and unique circumstances at Cigar Lake, a remote, isolated fly-in/fly-out northern Saskatchewan operation.” “We are all in this together,” said Orano Canada Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconformity-Associated Uranium Deposits of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta C.W
    UNCONFORMITY-ASSOCIATED URANIUM DEPOSITS OF THE ATHABASCA BASIN, SASKATCHEWAN AND ALBERTA C.W. JEFFERSON1, D.J. THOMAS2, S.S. GANDHI1, P. RAMAEKERS3, G. DELANEY4, D. BRISBIN2, C. CUTTS5, D. QUIRT5, P. PORTELLA5, AND R.A. OLSON6 1. Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8 2. Cameco Corporation, 2121 - 11th Street West, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7M 1J3 3. MF Resources, 832 Parkwood Drive SE, Calgary, Alberta T2J 2W7 4. Saskatchewan Industry and Resources, 2101 Scarth Street, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3V7 5. AREVA Resources Canada Inc., P.O. Box 9204, 817 - 45th Street W., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 3X5 6. Alberta Geological Survey, Energy Utilities Board, 4th Floor, Twin Atria, 4999 - 98 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3 Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] Abstract This review of the geology, geophysics, and origin of the unconformity-associated uranium deposit type is focused on the Athabasca Basin. Pods, veins, and semimassive replacements of uraninite (var. pitchblende) are located close to unconformities between late Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic conglomeratic sandstone basins and metamorphosed basement rocks. The thin, overall flat-lying, and apparently unmetamorphosed but pervasively altered, mainly fluvial strata include red to pale tan quartzose conglomerate, sandstone, and mudstone. Beneath the basal unconformity, red hematitic and bleached clay-altered regolith grades down through chloritic altered to fresh basement gneiss. The highly meta- morphosed interleaved Archean to Paleoproterozoic granitoid and supracrustal basement gneiss includes graphitic metapelitic that preferentially hosts reactivated shear zones and many deposits. A broad variety of deposit shapes, sizes and compositions ranges from monometallic and generally basement-hosted veins to polymetallic lenses located just above or straddling the unconformity, with variable Ni, Co, As, Pb and traces of Au, Pt, Cu, REEs, and Fe.
    [Show full text]
  • <Attached> 1. Outline of the Cigar Lake Uranium Mine the Cigar Lake
    <Attached> 1. Outline of the Cigar Lake Uranium Mine The Cigar Lake Mine, located in northern Saskatchewan, Canada, at 58 degrees north latitude, is one of the world’s largest, high-grade uranium deposit. We plan to use the very latest mining technology called Jet Boring System to mine uranium ores, which lies at some 450 meters below. Proven and probable reserves of the Cigar Lake deposit is approximately 176,000 short tons U3O8 and the deposit is lied in two parts with different grades. The larger part of the deposit is to be mined as the first stage (Phase 1) of the project. ・Proven and probable reserves 176,000 short tons of U3O8 (136,000 tons of U) ・Multi year production Phase 1 (2007 – 2021) 116,000 short tons of U3O8 (89,000 tons of U), average grade of 19.0％ *Production schedule of Phase2 (60,000 short tons of U3O8) is to be considered. ・Annual production 9,000 short tons of U3O8（Phase 1, at full production） ・ Mining method Jet Boring method (A method whereby ores are collected through the injection of high-pressure water） All procedures carried out remotely to minimize employees’ exposure to radiation ・ Partners CAMECO（Operator, Canada） 50.025％ COGEMA（Canadian subsidiary*） 37.100％ Idemitsu Kosan（Canadian subsidiary **） 7.875％ TEPCO（Canadian subsidiary ***） 5.000％ *COGEMA Resources Inc. **Idemitsu Uranium Exploration Canada Ltd. ***TEPCO Resources Inc. Each joint venture partner pays the cost of construction and operation of the mine according to the percentage of interests, and receive the products (uranium concentrates) also according to the percentage.
    [Show full text]