DOCSLIB.ORG

Chelsea Manning and the Politics of Knowledge Curation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This is a repository copy of Obfuscated democracy? Chelsea Manning and the politics of knowledge curation. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138950/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Garnett, Philip orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-0220 and Hughes, Sarah M. (2019) Obfuscated democracy? Chelsea Manning and the politics of knowledge curation. Political Geography. 23 - 33. ISSN 0962-6298 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.11.001 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Obfuscated democracy? Chelsea Manning and the politics of knowledge curation - Supplementary Data Supplementary Table 1: Systematic Journal Search Table Construction The search period for the database was from the 28th of November 2010 and until the 31st July 2018. This search produced 263 academic papers and books (including a few other items) that matched the terms; Wikileaks, Manning, US Cables, Cablegate. Papers and books had undergone peer review were retained, and their status as either International Relations or Political Geography journals recorded. Out of the 263 items found: • 155 were accessible peer reviewed articles o From this, 15 were published in a Political Geography or International Relations journal. • 14 papers made significant reference to the cable leaks and used leaked materials in the article. • 34 engaged with the leaked cables but did not refer specifically to a leaked document or reproduce any part of a document or data. • 28 engaged with the Chelsea Manning’s case. A small number of articles, and international articles, and some book chapters were not accessible to us. Book reviews, comments, and media articles are in the table but not counted. Key to the Table The table contains the results of a search for papers engaging with Wikileaks and more specifically the cable leaks. Cables: indicates whether the paper makes significant mention of the US cable leaks. Manning: indicates with the paper makes significant mention of Private Manning. No' in either of these columns indicates no mention of either the cables or Manning, and therefore would indicate that the paper only engages with Wikileaks (and then not in any depth). 'Mentioned' would indicate that either the cables or Manning are mentioned but there is no significant engagement with the issues around either (for example, they are mentioned as part of contextual information). 'Yes' would indicate that the cables or Manning are significant to the paper's argument. 'Significant' indicates that there is more extensive engagement with either the Manning case or Cables material, often referring directly to documents or reproducing documents/data. IR: indicates either Political Science and International Relations journals. Geog: journal could be classified as in the Geography domain. The papers are divided into sub-tables of different categories, some papers will appear in more than table. Some of the papers were excluded and these are separated into table 2, the reason is noted in the final column. Table 1a – Papers that make extensive use of the cables or extensive reference to the Manning case. Reference Cables Manning IR Geog Notes Allan, S., and K. Anden-Papadopoulos. 2010. “‘Come On, Let Us Shoot!’: WikiLeaks and the Cultures of Militarization.” TOPIA-CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL STUDIES, no. 23-24. 244–53. Significant No No No Benkler, Y. SUM 2011. “A Free Irresponsible Press: Wikileaks and the Battle over the Soul of the Networked Fourth Estate.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 46 (2). 311–97. Significant Yes No No Bicakci, S., D. Rende, S. Rende, and O. T. Yildiz. 2014. “WikiLeaks on the Middle East: Obscure Diplomacy Networks and Binding Spaces.” JOURNAL OF BALKAN AND NEAR EASTERN STUDIES 16 (4). 459– 73. Significant No No No Dawisha, Karen. 2011. “Is Russia’s Foreign Policy That of a Corporatist-Kleptocratic Regime?” Post-Soviet Affairs 27 (4): 331–65. Significant No Yes No Frampton, M., and E. Rosen. 2013. “READING THE RUNES? THE UNITED STATES AND THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AS SEEN THROUGH THE WIKILEAKS CABLES.” Historical Journal: 56 (3). 827– 56. Significant No No No Linke, Andrew M., Frank D. W. Witmer, and John O’Loughlin. 2012. “Space-Time Granger Analysis of the War in Iraq: A Study of Coalition and Insurgent Action- War Reaction.” International Interactions 38 (4): 402–25. Significant No Yes No Logs Lynch, Lisa. 2013. “Cablegate in the Congo: Mapping the Digital Trail of Wikileaks Cables about the ‘Forgotten’ DRC.” Radical History Review 2013 (117). 49–69. Significant No No No Mabon, S. 2013. “Aiding Revolution? Wikileaks, Communication and the ‘Arab Spring’ in Egypt.” Third World Quarterly 34 (10). 1843–57. Significant Yes No No Michael, G. J. 2015. “Who’s Afraid of WikiLeaks? Missed Opportunities in Political Science Research.” The Review of Policy Research 32 (2). 175–99. Significant No No No O’Loughlin, John, Frank D. W. Witmer, Andrew M. Linke, and Nancy Thorwardson. 2010. “Peering into the Fog oF War: The Geography oF the WikiLeaks Afghanistan War Logs, 2004-2009.” Eurasian War Geography and Economics 51 (4): 472–95. Significant No No Yes Logs Pegg, Scott, and Eiki Berg. 2016. “Lost and Found: The WikiLeaks oF De Facto State–Great Power Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (3): 267–86. Significant Mentioned No No Tidy, Joanna. 2017. “Visual Regimes and the Politics oF War Experience: Rewriting War ‘From Above’ in WikiLeaks’ ‘Collateral Murder.’” Review oF International Studies 43 (01): 95–111. Significant Yes Yes No Vucetic, Srdjan, and Rebecka S. Rydberg. 2015. “Remnants of Empire: Tracing Norway’s F-35 Decision.” Contemporary Security Policy 36 (1): 56–78. Significant Mentioned No No Zammit-Mangion, Andrew, Michael Dewar, Visakan Kadirkamanathan, and Guido Sanguinetti. 2012. “Point Process Modelling oF the Afghan War Diary.” Proceedings oF the National Academy oF Sciences oF Data the United States of America 109 (31): 12414–19. Significant No No No Analysis Table 1b – Papers where the cables are significant to the paper’s argument. Reference Cables Manning IR Geog Notes Balkin, J. M. 2013. “Old-School/new-School Speech Regulation.” Harvard Law Review 127 (8): 2296–2342. Yes Mentioned No No Balzacq, Thierry, and Benjamin Puybareau. 2018. “The Economy oF Secrecy: Security, InFormation Control, and EU‒US Relations.” West European Politics 41 (4): 890–913. Yes No No No Bellia, P. L. 2012. “WikiLeaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures.” The Yale Law Journal 121 (6). 1448–1526. Yes Yes No No Berghel, H. 2012. “WikiLeaks and the Matter of Private Manning.” Computer 45 (3). 70–73. Yes Yes No No Media Beyer, J. L. 2014. “The Emergence of a Freedom of Information Movement: Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Pirate Party, and Iceland.” Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication: JCMC 19 (2). 141–54. Yes Mentioned No No Boothroyd, D. 2011. “Off the Record Levinas, Derrida and the Secret of Responsibility.” THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY 28 (7-8). 41–59. Yes Yes No No Brevini, Benedetta. 2017. “WikiLeaks: Between Disclosure and Whistle-Blowing in Digital Times.” Sociology Compass 11 (3): e12457. Yes Yes No No Burgess, Edwin B. 2012. “Private: Bradley Manning, WikiLeaks, and the Biggest Exposure oF OFFicial Secrets in American History.” Libr. J. REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 360 PARK AVENUE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010 USA. Yes Yes No No Book Cammaerts, B. 2013. “Networked Resistance: The Case of WikiLeaks.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication: JCMC 18 (4). 420–36. Yes Mentioned No No Coddington, M. 2012. “Defending a Paradigm by Patrolling a Boundary: Two Global Newspapers’ Approach to WikiLeaks.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (3). 377–96. Yes No No No Cseke, Botond, Andrew Zammit-Mangion, Tom Heskes, and Guido Sanguinetti. 2016. “Sparse Approximate InFerence For Spatio-Temporal Point Process Models.” Journal oF the American Statistical Association 111 (516): 1746–63. Yes No No No Earl, Jennifer, and Jessica L. Beyer. 2014. “The Dynamics of Backlash Online: Anonymous and the Battle for WikiLeaks.” In Intersectionality and Social Change, edited by L. M. Woehrle, 37:207–33. Yes Yes No No Fenster, M. 2012. “Disclosure’s Effects: WikiLeaks and Transparency.” Iowa Law Review 97 (3). 753–807. Yes Yes No No Freedman, J. WIN 2012. “PROTECTING STATE SECRETS AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: A STRATEGY FOR PROSECUTING WIKILEAKS.” Stanford Journal of International Law 48 (1). 185–208. Yes Yes No No Gill, M., and A. Spirling. SPR 2015. “Estimating the Severity of the WikiLeaks US Diplomatic Cables Disclosure.” Political Analysis: An Annual Publication Yes Yes No No of the Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association 23 (2). 299–305. Gubrud, Mark A. 2011. “Chinese and US Kinetic Energy Space Weapons and Arms Control.” Asian Perspective 35 (4): 617–41. Yes No No No Handley, R. L. 2014. “CROSS- AND EXTRA- NATIONAL JOURNALISTIC PARTNERSHIPS And the National Outlook.” JOURNALISM STUDIES 15 (2). 138–53. Yes No No No Handley, R. L., and A. Ismail. 2013. “A Watchdog to Reckon with: Delivering WikiLeaks in the Israeli and Australian Press.” JOURNALISM 14 (5). 643–60. Yes No No No Handley, R. L., and L. Rutigliano. 2012. “Journalistic Field Wars: Defending and Attacking the National Narrative in a Diversifying Journalistic Field.” Media Culture & Society 34 (6).
Recommended publications
  • Nomination Press Release

    Nomination Press Release

    Elisabeth Moss as Peggy Olson Outstanding Lead Actor In A Drama Series Nashville • ABC • ABC Studios Connie Britton as Rayna James Breaking Bad • AMC • Sony Pictures Television Scandal • ABC • ABC Studios Bryan Cranston as Walter White Kerry Washington as Olivia Pope Downton Abbey • PBS • A Carnival / Masterpiece Co-Production Hugh Bonneville as Robert, Earl of Grantham Outstanding Lead Actor In A Homeland • Showtime • Showtime Presents, Miniseries Or A Movie Teakwood Lane Productions, Cherry Pie Behind The Candelabra • HBO • Jerry Productions, Keshet, Fox 21 Weintraub Productions in association with Damian Lewis as Nicholas Brody HBO Films House Of Cards • Netflix • Michael Douglas as Liberace Donen/Fincher/Roth and Trigger Street Behind The Candelabra • HBO • Jerry Productions, Inc. in association with Media Weintraub Productions in association with Rights Capital for Netflix HBO Films Kevin Spacey as Francis Underwood Matt Damon as Scott Thorson Mad Men • AMC • Lionsgate Television The Girl • HBO • Warner Bros. Jon Hamm as Don Draper Entertainment, GmbH/Moonlighting and BBC in association with HBO Films and Wall to The Newsroom • HBO • HBO Entertainment Wall Media Jeff Daniels as Will McAvoy Toby Jones as Alfred Hitchcock Parade's End • HBO • A Mammoth Screen Production, Trademark Films, BBC Outstanding Lead Actress In A Worldwide and Lookout Point in association Drama Series with HBO Miniseries and the BBC Benedict Cumberbatch as Christopher Tietjens Bates Motel • A&E • Universal Television, Carlton Cuse Productions and Kerry Ehrin
  • Hamptons Doc Fest 2020 Congratulations on 13 Years of Championing Documentary Films!

    Hamptons Doc Fest 2020 Congratulations on 13 Years of Championing Documentary Films!

    Art: Nofa Aji Zatmiko ALL DOCS ALL DAY DOCS ALL ALL OPENING NIGHT FILM: MLK/FBI Hamptons Doc Fest DECEMBER 4–13, 2020 www.hamptonsdocfest.com is a year we will long Wiseman and his newest film, City Hall. 2020 rememberWELCOME or want LETTER to He stands as one of the documentary forget. Deprived of a movie theater’s giants that every aspiring filmmaker magic we struggled to take the virtual learns from, that Wiseman way of plunge. Ultimately, we decided on yes observing life unfold. Our Award films we can to bring you our 13th festival capture the essence of Art & Music, in these overwhelming times. We Human Rights, and the Environment. programmed 35 great documentary Our Opening night film reveals a hidden films to watch in the warmth and chapter in Martin Luther King’s world. comfort of your home over 10 days. No New this year, you’ll hear and see UP worries about weather, parking, ticket CLOSE video clips presented by the lines, where to catch a snack between Directors of each film. My thanks to an films. You can schedule your own day extraordinary team, and to our Artistic the way you like it. Consider it not Director, Karen Arikian. Lastly, you will only a festival experience but a virtual find all the information and help you’ll festival experiment. need to watch films on your television, When Covid hit, Hamptons Doc Fest tablet or computer. So click on and went into overdrive. We were forced step into the big virtual world wherever to cancel our Docs Equinox Spring you are.
  • Post-Truth Protest: How 4Chan Cooked Up...Zagate Bullshit | Tuters

    Post-Truth Protest: How 4Chan Cooked Up...Zagate Bullshit | Tuters

    5/5/2019 Post-Truth Protest: How 4chan Cooked Up the Pizzagate Bullshit | Tuters | M/C Journal M/C JOURNAL Home > Vol 21, No 3 (2018) > Tuters ARTICLE TOOLS HOME Post-Truth Protest: How 4chan Cooked Up the Pizzagate Bullshit PRINT THIS ARTICLE Marc Tuters, Emilija Jokubauskaitė, Daniel Bach CURRENT ISSUE INDEXING METADATA HOW TO CITE ITEM UPCOMING ISSUES Introduction FINDING REFERENCES ARCHIVES On 4 December 2016, a man entered a Washington, D.C., pizza parlor armed with an AR­15 assault rifle in an attempt to save the victims of an alleged satanic pedophilia ring run by EMAIL THIS ARTICLE CONTRIBUTORS prominent members of the Democratic Party. While the story had already been discredited (LOGIN REQUIRED) (LaCapria), at the time of the incident, nearly half of Trump voters were found to give a ABOUT M/C JOURNAL measure of credence to the same rumors that had apparently inspired the gunman (Frankovic). EMAIL THE AUTHOR Was we will discuss here, the bizarre conspiracy theory known as "Pizzagate" had in fact (LOGIN REQUIRED) USER HOME originated a month earlier on 4chan/pol/, a message forum whose very raison d’être is to protest against “political correctness” of the liberal establishment, and which had recently ABOUT THE AUTHORS JOURNAL CONTENT become a hub for “loose coordination” amongst members the insurgent US ‘alt­right’ movement Marc Tuters SEARCH (Hawley 48). Over a period of 25 hours beginning on 3 November 2016, contributors to the /pol/ forum combed through a cache of private e­mails belonging to Hillary Clinton’s campaign https://oilab.eu manager John Podesta, obtained by Russian hackers (Franceschi­Bicchierai) and leaked by University of Amsterdam SEARCH SCOPE Julian Assange (Wikileaks).
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    Proceedings of the Fifteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2021) A Large Open Dataset from the Parler Social Network Max Aliapoulios1, Emmi Bevensee2, Jeremy Blackburn3, Barry Bradlyn4, Emiliano De Cristofaro5, Gianluca Stringhini6, Savvas Zannettou7 1New York University, 2SMAT, 3Binghamton University, 4University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 5University College London, 6Boston University, 7Max Planck Institute for Informatics [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract feasible in technical terms to create a new social media plat- Parler is as an “alternative” social network promoting itself form, but marketing the platform towards specific polarized as a service that allows to “speak freely and express yourself communities is an extremely successful strategy to bootstrap openly, without fear of being deplatformed for your views.” a user base. In other words, there is a subset of users on Twit- Because of this promise, the platform become popular among ter, Facebook, Reddit, etc., that will happily migrate to a new users who were suspended on mainstream social networks platform, especially if it advertises moderation policies that for violating their terms of service, as well as those fearing do not restrict the growth and spread of political polariza- censorship. In particular, the service was endorsed by several tion, conspiracy theories, extremist ideology, hateful and vi- conservative public figures, encouraging people to migrate olent speech, and mis- and dis-information. from traditional social networks. After the storming of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, Parler has been progressively de- Parler.
  • Running Head: Wikileaks and the Censorship of News Media in the U.S

    Running Head: Wikileaks and the Censorship of News Media in the U.S

    RUNNING HEAD: WIKILEAKS AND THE CENSORSHIP OF NEWS MEDIA IN THE U.S. WikiLeaks and the Censorship of News Media in the U.S. Author: Asa Hilmersson Faculty Mentor: Professor Keeton Ramapo College of New Jersey WIKILEAKS AND THE CENSORSHIP OF NEWS MEDIA IN THE U.S. 1 “Censorship in free societies is infinitely more sophisticated and thorough than in dictatorships, because ‘unpopular ideas can be silenced, and inconvenient facts kept dark, without any need for an official ban’.” – George Orwell Introduction Throughout history, media has been censored or obscured in different ways which seem to fit the dominant ideology or ruling regime. As William Powers (1995) from The Washington Post said; the Nazis were censored, Big Brother was a censor, and nightmare regimes such as China have censors. Though we are all aware of censorship around the world and in history, little do we look to ourselves because as Powers writes, “None of that [censorship] for us. This is America” (para. 3). People in America have long been led to believe that they live in a free world where every voice is heard. It is not until someone uses the opportunities of this right that we see that this freedom of speech might only be an illusion. The emergence of WikiLeaks in 2010 and the censorship exercised against this organization by the United States’ government exemplifies the major obstacles individuals can face when seeking to expose potential wrongdoing by public officials. Through questioning of media’s power as whistleblowers it is hinted that there are institutions which may carry more weight than the truth in making decisions that affect that public interest.
  • On the Case of Julian Assange

    On the Case of Julian Assange

    The OSCE Secretariat bears no responsibility for the content of this document PC.DEL/262/20 and circulates it without altering its content. The distribution by OSCE 6 March 2020 Conference Services of this document is without prejudice to OSCE decisions, as set out in documents agreed by OSCE participating States. ENGLISH only United States Mission to the OSCE On the Case of Julian Assange As delivered by Acting Deputy Chief of Mission Gregory Macris to the Permanent Council, Vienna March 5, 2020 The United States seeks to deter unauthorized disclosure of classified information, including via prosecution. This is done transparently and according to the laws of the United States. In 2013, Chelsea Manning was convicted by court martial for offenses that involved violations of her military oath to protect and defend the United States. As you know, she provided Julian Assange and WikiLeaks with hundreds of thousands of pages of security information related to national defense. The U.S. Department of Justice indicted Julian Assange for his alleged complicity in Manning’s actions, including his explicit solicitation of classified information and his encouraging Ms. Manning to remove classified information from U.S. systems. The indictment also charges Assange for allegedly posting a subset of classified documents on WikiLeaks that identified the names of human sources, including local Afghans and Iraqis who were assisting U.S. forces, journalists, religious leaders, human rights advocates, and political dissidents living in repressive regimes, thereby causing grave and imminent risk to these individuals’ lives and liberty. The United States takes freedom of the press seriously and is thankful for the invaluable role journalists play in a free society.
  • The Views of the U.S. Left and Right on Whistleblowers Whistleblowers on Right and U.S

    The Views of the U.S. Left and Right on Whistleblowers Whistleblowers on Right and U.S

    The Views of the U.S. Left and Right on Whistleblowers Concerning Government Secrets By Casey McKenzie Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations and European Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Erin Kristin Jenne Word Count: 12,868 CEU eTD Collection Budapest Hungary 2014 Abstract The debates on whistleblowers in the United States produce no simple answers and to make thing more confusing there is no simple political left and right wings. The political wings can be further divided into far-left, moderate-left, moderate-right, far-right. To understand the reactions of these political factions, the correct political spectrum must be applied. By using qualitative content analysis of far-left, moderate-left, moderate-right, far-right news sites I demonstrate the debate over whistleblowers belongs along a establishment vs. anti- establishment spectrum. CEU eTD Collection i Acknowledgments I would like to express my fullest gratitude to my supervisor, Erin Kristin Jenne, for the all the help see gave me and without whose guidance I would have been completely lost. And to Danielle who always hit me in the back of the head when I wanted to give up. CEU eTD Collection ii Table of Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments.....................................................................................................................
  • Television Academy Awards

    Television Academy Awards

    2019 Primetime Emmy® Awards Ballot Outstanding Directing For A Documentary/Nonfiction Program Adam Ruins Everything Adam Ruins Guns November 27, 2018 Adam Conover takes aim at both sides of the gun debate by explaining why an assault weapons ban would be ineffective at stopping gun violence, outlining how the Second Amendment has been twisted to benefit the NRA, and revealing that liberal and conservative gun policies have impacted people of color. Tim Wilkime, Directed by America To Me Listen To The Poem! September 30, 2018 Spring semester brings fresh challenges. Jada clashes with junior Diane over her new film. Brendan recalls a racially charged basketball past. Tiara and the cheerleading squad go for the gold. Charles’ poetry slam team faces an epic challenge. Steve James, Directed by American Dream/American Knightmare December 21, 2018 Documentary that delves into the life and exploits of the iconic Death Row Records co-founder Suge Knight, and the era in gangsta rap he presided over. Through a series of face-to-face interviewers, Knight reveals exactly how it all happened and why it all fell apart. Antoine Fuqua, Directed by American Experience: The Circus October 08, 2018 - October 09, 2018 American Experience: The Circus explores the colorful history of this popular, influential and distinctly American form of entertainment, from the first one-ring show at the end of the 18th century to 1956, when the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey big top was pulled down for the last time. Sharon Grimberg, Directed by American Experience: The Eugenics Crusade October 16, 2018 American Experience: The Eugenics Crusade explores the unknown campaign to breed a “better” American race.
  • Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures

    Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures

    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL PATRICIA L. BELLIA WikiLeaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures ABSTRACT. WikiLeaks' successive disclosures of classified U.S. documents throughout 2010 and 2011 invite comparison to publishers' decisions forty years ago to release portions of the Pentagon Papers, the classified analytic history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The analogy is a powerful weapon for WikiLeaks' defenders. The Supreme Court's decision in the Pentagon Papers case signaled that the task of weighing whether to publicly disclose leaked national security information would fall to publishers, not the executive or the courts, at least in the absence of an exceedingly grave threat of harm. The lessons of the PentagonPapers case for WikiLeaks, however, are more complicated than they may first appear. The Court's per curiam opinion masks areas of substantial disagreement as well as a number of shared assumptions among the Court's members. Specifically, the Pentagon Papers case reflects an institutional framework for downstream disclosure of leaked national security information, under which publishers within the reach of U.S. law would weigh the potential harms and benefits of disclosure against the backdrop of potential criminal penalties and recognized journalistic norms. The WikiLeaks disclosures show the instability of this framework by revealing new challenges for controlling the downstream disclosure of leaked information and the corresponding likelihood of "unintermediated" disclosure by an insider; the risks of non-media intermediaries attempting to curtail such disclosures, in response to government pressure or otherwise; and the pressing need to prevent and respond to leaks at the source. AUTHOR.
  • As Assange Awaits Ruling, Wikileaks Faces Its Fate 1 November 2011, by RAPHAEL G

    As Assange Awaits Ruling, Wikileaks Faces Its Fate 1 November 2011, by RAPHAEL G

    As Assange awaits ruling, WikiLeaks faces its fate 1 November 2011, By RAPHAEL G. SATTTER , Associated Press Harvard University's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Legal analysts were predicting a ruling in favor of extradition. "Very, very few people defeat a European Arrest Warrant," said Julian Knowles, an extradition lawyer at London's Matrix Chambers who has been following the case. "The courts in England generally lean in favor of extradition." Assange may have the right to challenge an This is a Monday, Feb. 7, 2011 file photo of WikiLeaks unfavorable verdict in Britain's Supreme Court. But founder Julian Assange as he leaves Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in London. Assange on Tuesday Nov. Knowles said that if he were denied leave to 1, 2011 awaits a judge's extradition verdict, it could be appeal, it could be only days before he were sent to WikiLeaks' very future that's at stake. Its finances under Scandinavia to face allegations of sex crimes. pressure and some of its biggest revelations already public, WikiLeaks may not have the strength to survive if That result could be devastating for WikiLeaks. Britain's High Court judge decides Wednesday in favor of a Swedish request to extradite Assange to face trial For much of the past year Assange has been over rape allegations, some experts argue. (AP running the website from a supporter's country Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, File) manor in eastern England, where the terms of his bail have confined him to virtual house arrest. The 40-year-old Australian says he has 20 staff (AP) -- As Julian Assange awaits a judge's members, but it's unclear who might take over were extradition verdict, it could be WikiLeaks' very he jailed.
  • USA -V- Julian Assange Judgment

    USA -V- Julian Assange Judgment

    JUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) Vanessa Baraitser In the Westminster Magistrates’ Court Between: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Requesting State -v- JULIAN PAUL ASSANGE Requested Person INDEX Page A. Introduction 2 a. The Request 2 b. Procedural History (US) 3 c. Procedural History (UK) 4 B. The Conduct 5 a. Second Superseding Indictment 5 b. Alleged Conduct 9 c. The Evidence 15 C. Issues Raised 15 D. The US-UK Treaty 16 E. Initial Stages of the Extradition Hearing 25 a. Section 78(2) 25 b. Section 78(4) 26 I. Section 78(4)(a) 26 II. Section 78(4)(b) 26 i. Section 137(3)(a): The Conduct 27 ii. Section 137(3)(b): Dual Criminality 27 1 The first strand (count 2) 33 The second strand (counts 3-14,1,18) and Article 10 34 The third strand (counts 15-17, 1) and Article 10 43 The right to truth/ Necessity 50 iii. Section 137(3)(c): maximum sentence requirement 53 F. Bars to Extradition 53 a. Section 81 (Extraneous Considerations) 53 I. Section 81(a) 55 II. Section 81(b) 69 b. Section 82 (Passage of Time) 71 G. Human Rights 76 a. Article 6 84 b. Article 7 82 c. Article 10 88 H. Health – Section 91 92 a. Prison Conditions 93 I. Pre-Trial 93 II. Post-Trial 98 b. Psychiatric Evidence 101 I. The defence medical evidence 101 II. The US medical evidence 105 III. Findings on the medical evidence 108 c. The Turner Criteria 111 I.
  • Oct16-Newsletter

    Oct16-Newsletter

    COURAGE TO RESIST Supporting the troops who refuse to fight! www.couragetoresist.org 484 Lake Park Ave #41, Oakland CA 94610 510-488-3559 October 2016 National Newsletter facebook.com/couragetoresist Chelsea Manning again thrown in solitary By the Chelsea Manning Support mistreated by the US government since year, they threatened her with solitary Network and Fight for the Future. she was first taken into custody in 2010, confinement for minor “infractions” September 23, 2016 including long stretches of extreme including possession of LGBTQ reading After years of inhumane treatment, solitary confinement even before she materials and an expired tube of and having been held in conditions that had ever been convicted. toothpaste. Only after we delivered the UN considers to be torture, Chelsea This is not the first time the 100,000 petitions did they back off. Manning, the Guardian columnist and government has harassed Chelsea with For the most current news, please whistleblower who has been in prison outrageous charges while in prison. Last visit chelseamanning.org for years serving a 35-year sentence for exposing some of the US government’s worst abuses, attempted to take her own life July 5, 2016. After a 5-day hunger strike this month, the US Army finally agreed to provide her with gender reassignment surgery and the health care that she needs. Chelsea’s hunger strike is a historic victory for human rights. However, today, a prison disciplinary board decided to Do not extend draft registration to women. punish Chelsea with 14 days of solitary End war registration for everyone! confinement (with 7 days suspended) for charges related to her suicide attempt, and possession of an unmarked book in her cell.