DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability Challenges for Informal Plantations in Lsimangaliso Wetlands Park: Impacts and Perceptions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability Challenges for Informal Plantations in Lsimangaliso Wetlands Park: Impacts and Perceptions Sustainability challenges for informal plantations in lsimangaliso Wetlands Park: impacts and perceptions BL Mdluli orcid.org/ 0000-0001-9879-6622 Mini-dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof FP Retief Graduation May 2018 27625966 DECLARATION I declare that this research study: Sustainability challenges for informal plantations in Isimangaliso Wetlands Park: impacts and perceptions, except where specifically indicated to the contrary in the text, is my own work both in conception and execution. All the theoretical information and related sources that have been used or quoted have been duly acknowledged by means of complete references. It is further declared that this dissertation has not previously been submitted to any institution for degree purposes. By Bongani Loveous Mdluli i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the following persons: • My supervisor Prof Francois Retief for his guidance, valuable time, moral support and encouragement. It would not have been possible to write and complete this dissertation without his assistance; • My family for believing in me, being supportive and acting as a source of inspiration. Your encouraging words and support have brought me to this point in my career; • Sibongile Zimu who helped me with some of the practical problems during the data collection; • Jabu Sithole for sharing her ideas and experiences, and Sifiso Xaba for his encouragement and support in the course of my career; • My friends and all who supported me during my study; • I thank God for granting me the courage to complete my studies. ii ABSTRACT Certain forest activities in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park have made a significant contribution to the economy; forest products range from natural forest products to commercial forest products derived from forests ranging from timber to non-timber forests products. The local communities of iSimangaliso Wetland Park practise informal afforestation (Eucalyptus, Wattle and Pine). All these informal activities are progressively contributing, not only to the gradual deterioration of the status of the water resources, but also to spoiling the ecosystem between living organisms and non-living organisms around the iSimangaliso Wetland Park. These occurrences are impacting adversely on the aesthetic appeal of the Park. What is implicit is that the rate at which informal afforestation is taking place at the Wetland Park will increase which will reduce the water availability in the river catchments and in turn affect the employment rate within the local communities. Pursuant to these observations and problems, the researcher found it appealing and necessary to explore the informal afforestation and its reduction caused by afforestation in the catchment. In an attempt to address the research question or problem, the following research objectives were set up: To assess how local communities in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park perceive the practice of informal afforestation; To assess the reduction of water resources caused by the informal afforestation (Eucalyptus, Pine and Wattle) in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park in order to project future use of water resources; and To project the future status of water resources in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park. The research methodology applied to achieve the objectives of the research study involved collecting information from the local communities of iSimangaliso Wetland Park. Data were collected by means of sets of questionnaires. The data collected was analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) computer statistical package and spread sheets, which led to obtaining the research findings. Various findings that emerged and were deduced from the research data analysed. The findings indicated that too much informal afforestation is practised by the local communities in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park. The findings further indicated that, among the respondents from the study area of the Park, a limited number of them had received tertiary education. It is believed that the lack of tertiary education had influenced the availability of skills, which resulted in a large number of people participating in practising informal activities that would pose negative to water resources. The Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) needs to improve awareness about the negative impacts about the iii practised of informal afforestation in water resources. The delayed of the issuance of Water Use Licences(WUL) by the Department of Water and Sanitation will cause the local communities of iSimangaliso Wetland Park to practised informal afforestation. Finally, the local communities indicated that if the government come up with alternative crops to plant and markets to sell, they can remove all the informal afforestation and to plant that crops. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION………………………………………………………………………………………..…i Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………....ii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………iii-iv Table of contents……………………………………………………………………………………...v-vii List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………………………….viii List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………….........ix Definitions of Key Terms and Concepts……………………………………………………................x Acronyms………………………………………………………………………………………………....xi Chapter 1.ORIENTATION OF THE STUDY…………………..…………………………………….1 1.1. Introduction…………………………………………………….…….…………………………….1-3 1.2. Statement of the Problem………………………………………………………………........... 3-5 1.3. Delineation of the Study …………………………………………………………………………5-6 1.4. Objectives of the study…………………………………………………………………………. .6-6 1.5. Structure of the Dissertation……………………………………………………………………..6-7 Chapter 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY…………………………….………………………….2 2.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………......................7-7 2.2. Research Design………………………………………………………………………………... 7-8 2.3. Primary and Secondary Sources……………………………………………………………….8-9 2.4. Interview Data …………………………………………………………………………………….9-9 2.5. Survey Data Sources……………………………………………………………………………..9-9 2.6. Data Collection Technique ……………………………………………………………………10-10 2.6.1. Questionnaire ………………………………………………………………………………..10-10 2.6.2. Questionnaires design………………………………………………………………………10-11 2.6.3. The structure of the questionnaire ………………………………………….. .. …………11-12 2.7. Permission to conduct the study. ……………………………………………………………12-13 2.7.1 Data collection procedure …………………………………………………………………..12-12 2.7.2. Questionnaire for all respondents…………………………………………………………12-12 2.7.3. Sampling Technique ……………………………………………………………….……….12-13 Chapter 3. LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………………….3 3.1.Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..................14-14 3.2. Community Perception……………………………………………………………………….. 14-16 v 3.3. Informal Afforestation………………………………………………………………………….16-16 3.4. Wetland Park…………………………………………………………………………. ........... 16-16 3.5. Water Resource Management ……………………………………………………… .......... 16-16 3.6. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….. .......... 17-17 Chapter 4. RELATED MODELLING OF SPATIAL FEATURES: AFFORESTATION, WATER RESOURCES AND WETLAND PARK ………………………………………………………………4 4.1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..17-17 4.2. Role and Significance of Modelling in Geography ………………………………………... 17-18 4.3. Planning and Modelling of Forest Reserves in KwaZulu-Natal……………………......... 18-18 4.4. Planning and Modelling of Water Resources in KwaZulu-Natal…………………………18-19 4.5. Planning and Modelling of Wetland Parks in KwaZulu-Natal…………………………….. 19-19 4.6. IMP and Local Communities in KwaZulu-Natal…………………………………………….20-20 4.7. Cost Benefit Analysis of Spatial Features…………………………………………… ........ 20-21 4.8. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………...22-22 Chapter 5. STUDY AREA ………………………………………………………………………........5 5.1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..22-22 5.2. Relative Location……………………………………………………………………………....23-23 5.3. Absolute Location…………………………………………………………………………….. 23-24 5.4. Geography and Geomorphology……………………………………………………………. 24-24 5.5. Climatological Characteristics……………………………………………………………….. 24-24 5.6. Natural Tourism Activities……………………………………………………………………. 24-24 5.7. Demographics of the Study……………………………………………………………. ....... 24-25 5.8. Hydrological Features………………………………………………………………….......... 25-25 5.9. Environmental Conservation………………………………………………………………… 25-26 5.10. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….. ........ 26-26 Chapter 6. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION ………………………………………...6 6.1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………….26-26 6.2. Reserve Determination Analysis……………………………………………………….. ...... 26-30 6.3. Analysis of Biographic Characteristics……………………………………………………...31-34 6.4. Community awareness of the importance of forestry practice in the study area………………………………………………………………………………………. ....... 34-35 6.5. Perceptions of local Communities perceptions regarding the impact that caused by afforestation practices in the study area……………………………………………………. .35-36 vi 6.6. The status of the Water Use Licences in the study area ……………………………. .... 36-38 6.7. The determination of Lawful/Formal Versus Unlawful/Informal Water Use with a view to maintain the water level in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park ……………………........38-39 6.8. Reasons for the local communities to practice informal afforestation……..……...........39-40 6.9. Companies that provide seedlings to Unlawful Users ………….................................…40-41 6.10. Is practising informal afforestation user friendly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Sibaya Is Narrowly Separated from the LAKE SIBAYA Sea by a Range of High Forested Coastal Dunes
    Lake Sibaya is narrowly separated from the LAKE SIBAYA sea by a range of high forested coastal dunes. The lake is home to large hippopotamus SOUTH AFRICA and crocodile populations, although their numbers have dropped over the last fi fteen 72 years due principally to poaching. The lakeshore is also home to and the drying up of wetlands around the lake raising concerns the only known population of a rare climbing orchid. The yellow among environmentalists. Although Lake Sibaya has been desig- arrows vividly show the increase in cultivation of marginal lands nated a wetland of international importance, there has been little around Lake Sibaya. Agriculture in the lake catchment and along effort by communities around the lake to practice sustainable its drainage lines may cause erosion, eutrophication, pollution, management or to protect the rare species found in the region. 73 Lake Sibaya Lake Sibaya, situated on the coastal plain that makes up north-eastern KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa, is the country’s largest nat- ural freshwater lake, with an area of 60–70 km2 (23–27 square miles). Surface water in the surrounding coastal plain often disap- pears completely during dry years, making the lake the only permanent source of water for mammals and birds. This wetland also supports several of the region’s rural communities, which in many cases are to- tally dependent on its water and associated fl ora and fauna. A Ramsar conservation site, Lake Sibaya is also an important link a particular species of climbing orchid, bers have plummeted by 40 per cent between Kosi Bay and St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maputaland Coastal Plain and the Kosi Lake System
    AFRIQUE AUSTRALE Fl."aide & Pinto Cl954) give some account of the dir.t.ril:'utions of birds both here and elsewhere in Mozambique, while Gaigh<l1· U.9i'J} discusses aspects of the ecology of fish in the Limpopo Rivel.". A gastropod, Turritella sp., is especially common in the br-ackish marshes towards the l."ivel." mouth. Malaria and schistosomiasis occul." throughou.t the country, and the vectors of these diseases are ubiquitous in the wetlands. 8.5.g LA.KES AND I.AGOONS OF THE MOZAMBIQUE LOWLANDS Some coastal lates provide small fisheries, but they have not become centres foc agriculturlll development. All lie on the coastal plain in the central and southern i:-egions of Mozambique and expel"ience climates similar to that described for regions 8.6 and 8.5.f. Csee Fig. 8.2 Bèla Vista>. A list of the principal lakes and lagoons, with their areas, is given by the Dil."eccao Provincial dos Services Hidraulicos, in 'Indice dos Rios, Lagos e Lagoas de Mocambigue', Boletim da Sociedade de Estudos de Mocambique, 38: 158-159, 1969. Little scientific investigation has br,en made of the ecology of these lakes, but those that have connection ~ith the sea appear t~ be essentially similar to Kosi Bay, described in section 8. 6. However, one lake which bas received some attention is Lagoa Poelela. Th1s is a permanent water body reaching depths of 24 m lofi th an area of up to 92 kmz in some wet years. It has exceptionally clear water, and supports a luxul"iant macr:ophyte flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosi Bay Nature Reserve, South Africa
    KOSI BAY NATURE RESERVE SOUTH AFRICA Information sheet for the site designated to the List of Wetlands of International Importance in terms of the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat South African Wetlands Conservation Programme Document No 24/21/3/3/3/11 (1991) Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Private Bag X447 PRETORIA 0001 South Africa ------------------------------------------------------------------------ KOSI BAY NATURE RESERVE: RAMSAR DATA 1. COUNTRY South Africa 2. DATE OF COMPILATION Originally completed: Nov/Dec 1988 Updated: Oct 1995 3. REFERENCE NUMBER 1ZA011 4. COMPILER Originally compiled by: Updated by: Dr Robert Kyle a) Dr Robert Kyle Fisheries Research Officer b) M C Ward PO Box 43 a) PO Box 43 KwaNgwanase KwaNgwanase 3973 3973 South Africa b) Private Bag X314 Tel (035) 5721011 Mbazwana Fax (035) 5721011 3974 5. NAME OF WETLAND KOSI BAY NATURE RESERVE 6. DATE OF RAMSAR DESIGNATION 28 June 1991 7. GEOGRAPHICAL CO-ORDINATES 26 52' S - 27 10' S, 32 42' E - 32 54' E Maps Number 1: 50 000 2632 DD and 2732 BB. 8. GENERAL LOCATION The system is orientated on an east north-east to south south-west axis. Bounded by Mozambique in the north and the Indian Ocean in east. The western border encapsulates the lakes of the Kosi System from a point on the Mozambique border ± 4 km from the Ocean. The border goes round much of the extant swamp forest around the system and in the south includes much of the catchment. In the north west the reserve boundary includes a narrow strip of land around the margins of the lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwesac State of Mangroves
    Wetlands Ecology and Management 12: 531–541, 2004. 531 # 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. The distribution and state of mangroves along the coast of Transkei, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa J.B. Adams*, B.M. Colloty and G.C. Bate Department of Botany, University of Port Elizabeth. P.O. Box 1600, Port Elizabeth 6000, South Africa; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +2741 5042429; fax: +2741 5832317) Received 9 September 2002; accepted in revised form 27 October 2003 Key words: Conservation, Cover, Density, Mangrove composition, Species, Threats, Utilization Abstract The mangrove communities along the coastline of the former Transkei, now part of the Eastern Cape Province, have not been looked at in detail since Ward and Steinke’s survey in 1982. Mangroves previously occurred in 17 estuaries but were now found in only 14 of the 76 estuaries visited, with a complete loss of mangroves evident in the Mnyameni, Mzimvubu and Bulungula estuaries amounting to 7.5 ha. Total mangrove loss amounted to 17.6 ha which represents a 6.5% loss over 17 years or 1.04 ha per annum. Tree cover had increased by 16.15 ha in eight other estuaries. This increase could be attributed to the inaccessibility of mangrove stands or to protection afforded by provincial nature reserves and hotel resorts. No new mangrove stands were recorded, although Steinke (pers. comm.) has recently recorded mangroves along the north bank of the Kei River. There has been little change in mangrove species composition in the different estuaries over the past 17 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (Archived)
    IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ iSimangaliso Wetland Park - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2017 (archived) Finalised on 08 November 2017 Please note: this is an archived Conservation Outlook Assessment for iSimangaliso Wetland Park. To access the most up-to-date Conservation Outlook Assessment for this site, please visit https://www.worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org. iSimangaliso Wetland Park SITE INFORMATION Country: South Africa Inscribed in: 1999 Criteria: (vii) (ix) (x) Site description: The ongoing fluvial, marine and aeolian processes in the site have produced a variety of landforms, including coral reefs, long sandy beaches, coastal dunes, lake systems, swamps, and extensive reed and papyrus wetlands. The interplay of the park's environmental heterogeneity with major floods and coastal storms and a transitional geographic location between subtropical and tropical Africa has resulted in exceptional species diversity and ongoing speciation. The mosaic of landforms and habitat types creates breathtaking scenic vistas. The site contains critical habitats for a range of species from Africa's marine, wetland and savannah environments. © UNESCO IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ iSimangaliso Wetland Park - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) SUMMARY 2017 Conservation Outlook Good with some concerns Significant progress continues to be made towards enhancing the World Heritage values through restoration projects and management interventions in accordance with a revised Integrated Management Plan. These include the restoration of wetlands, the removal of alien invasive plants, and the improved ecological functioning of the Lake St Lucia system. A coast and land care programme is in place. Relationships with local people have improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Isimangaliso Wetland Park Was Established in November 2000
    iSimangaliso My Rhino, Our Future uBhejane wami, Ikusasa lethu sonke “iSimangaliso must be the only place on the globe where the oldest land mammal (the rhinoceros) and the world’s biggest terrestrial mammal (the elephant) share an ecosystem with the world’s oldest fish (the coelacanth) and the world’s biggest marine mammal (the whale)” – President Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, 2001 iSimangaliso uBhejane wami, Ikusasa lethu sonke i KOSI BAY COASTAL FOREST LAKE SIBAYA SODWANA BAY UMKHUZE FALSE BAY CHARTERS CREEK LAKE ST LUCIA C APE VIDAL MAPHELANE Overview of the Park iSimangaliso means ‘land of miracles’ Jeqe was King Shaka’s insila. When Shaka died, Jeqe fled to avoid the insila’s customary burial with his master. He wandered into Thongaland, present- day uMkhanyakude District, and when he eventually returned, he said: “I saw wonders and miracles in the flat land and lakes of Thonga”. From that follows an isiZulu saying that if you have seen miracles, you have seen what Jeqe saw: Ubone isimanga esabonwa uJeqe kwelama Thonga. The iSimangaliso Wetland Park was established in November 2000. From Kosi Bay in the north, bordering Mozambique, to Maphelane, south of St Lucia, iSimangaliso is South Africa’s second largest protected area, covering 332 000 hectares. The Park includes many different areas; the eastern shores and Cape Vidal, Lake St Lucia (the biggest estuary in Africa), the western shores and Charter’s Creek, False Bay, Sodwana Bay (voted one of the top ten reefs to dive in the world), Lake Sibaya and the Coastal Forest. Together with Kosi Bay (high numbers of nesting leatherback and loggerhead turtles), Maphelane and uMkhuze, these areas are the Ten Jewels of iSimangaliso.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa's Longest Suspension Bridge Could Cut 4 Hours Off KZN-Maputo
    Africa's Longest Suspension Bridge Could Cut 4 Hours Off KZN-Map... http://afkinsider.com/108712/africas-longest-suspension-bridge-will-cu... Africa’s Longest Suspension Bridge Could Cut 4 Hours Off KZN-Maputo Drive By Dana Sanchez Published: December 21, 2015, 8:00 am Artist's impression of the planned bridge over the Bay of Maputo. IOL Breakfast in Durban, lunch in Mbabane, Swaziland, and dinner in Maputo, Mozambique. That may be a difficult road-trip scenario at present, but a bridge under construction across Maputo Bay could cut four hours off the drive time from the KwaZulu-Natal border to Maputo. Ferries currently carry people and goods across Mpauto Bay. The alternative — driving around, takes hours with roads to South Africa accessible only by 4×4. The bridge will connecting the two shores of the Bay of Maputo, linking Maputo and Catembe by the end of 2017. The Maputo-Catembe Bridge is expected to boost trade and tourism between South Africa and Mozambique, and tourism stakeholders are eagerly anticipating its completion. The drive from Maputo to Kosi Bay is just 90 kilometers (about 56 miles) but the trip takes up to six hours in a four-wheel drive because of the poor condition of the road. Construction began in 2014 on will become Africa’s longest suspension bridge, a joint project of the Mozambique and Chinese governments. The bridge will be 3 kilometers (1.9 miles) long with a main span of 680 meters (2,231 feet). Completion of the bridge will open up the region for tourism, said Natalie Tenzer-Silva, director at Dana Tours, in a Tourism Update interview.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife Is a Non Vat Vendor
    Ezemvel o KZN Wi l d l i fe Fees & Charges 2019 - 2021 Conservation, Partnerships & Ecotourism 1 November 2019 - 31 October 2021 Page 1 of 19 IMPORTANT INFORMATION 1. All rates quoted are inclusive of Community Levy and Emergency Rescue Levy. Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife is a non vat vendor. Tariffs are valid from 1 November 2019 to 31 October 2021 and are subject to alteration without prior notice. 2. High season is applicable over public holidays, school holidays, long weekends, events and high occupancy periods. 3. Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park: Conservation Fee: Overnight Visitors: A daily Conservation Levy of R240 per adult and R120 per child under 12 years will be charged. South African and Southern African Development Countries (SADC) residents who provide proof of identity may apply for a discount on this fee, (R120 per person per day). Day Visitors: Pay the Conserva- tion Fee for Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park. 4. The SA Conservation Fee at Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park is not applicable to tour operators and travel agents. Other Parks: Overnight Visitors: are not required to pay the Conservation Fee except for Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park and parks that fall under the iSimangaliso Wetland Park. Day Visitors: Are required to pay a Conservation Fee. 5. South African residents 60 years and over and bona-fide students are granted a discount of 20% on accommodation tar- iffs during low season. These discounts exclude high season, events, wilderness trails, overnight hiking, bush camps and bush lodges. SA residents qualify for the above discount on presentation of identification and proof of age for pension- ers, or a valid student card for students, failing which full rates will be charged.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Forests of Northern Kwazulu-Natal: Sediment Conditions and Population Structure of the Largest Mangrove Forests in South Africa
    Western Indian Ocean J. Mar. Sci. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 25-38, 2011 © 2011 WIOMSA Mangrove Forests of Northern KwaZulu-Natal: Sediment Conditions and Population Structure of the Largest Mangrove Forests in South Africa Anusha Rajkaran and Janine Adams Botany Department, PO Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU), Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 6031. Keywords: Population structure, mangrove distribution, Avicennia marina, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Rhizophora mucronata. Abstract—The state of mangroves in the large forests of northern KwaZulu- Natal (KZN), South Africa, was assessed in terms of sediment characteristics and population structure in 2007. The tallest trees with the widest diameter at breast height were found at Mhlathuze (Avicennia marina) and Echwebeni (Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Rhizophora mucronata) in Richards Bay. The height of trees at these estuaries increased with the age of the forest stands (2.4 m in the youngest to 14.3 m in the oldest stands). In South Africa, Ceriops tagal and Lumitzera racemosa occur under a narrow range of environmental conditions as they are only found at Kosi Bay. Avicennia marina and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza were found in all estuaries sampled in a wide range of conditions, from highly oxidised sediments (+125 to + 322.7 mV) to those that were very reduced (-360 to -35.8 mV), and from freshwater to saline conditions. Bruguiera occurred in drier habitats and tree density was negatively correlated with sediment moisture content. The density of Avicennia marina was not significantly correlated with any sediment parameter while the density of Rhizophora mucronata was positively correlated with pore water temperature. Although most forests were regenerating, indicated by their population structure (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Sousa Plumbea – Indian Ocean Humpback Dolphin
    Sousa plumbea – Indian Ocean Humpback Dolphin plumbea in the central and western Indian Ocean, S. chinensis in the eastern Indian and western Pacific oceans, and S. sahulensis over the Sahul Shelf extending between Australia and the island of New Guinea (Jefferson & Rosenbaum 2014). Assessment Rationale The Indian Ocean Humpback Dolphin (from here on, Humpback Dolphin) ranges along the southern and eastern South African coast, from False Bay to Kosi Bay, in shallow waters typically less than 25 m in depth. Correspondingly, the majority of the population occurs Brett Atkins within 500 m to 2 km of the coastline. The length of the coastline from False Bay to Kosi Bay is 2,661 km (including estuaries), which yields an extent of occurrence Regional Red List status (2016) Endangered (EOO) between approximately 1,331 to 5,322 km2. Using A4cd+B1ab(iii,v)* 1.5 km as a proxy for water depth yields 3,992 km2. In National Red List status (2004) Vulnerable B1ab(ii,iii) reality as the suitable habitat is likely to vary between 500 m and 2 km from shore along the length of the country’s Reasons for change Genuine change coastline and many areas are unsuitable, it is highly Global Red List status (2008) Endangered probable that the overall EOO is < 5,000 km2. The A3cd+4cd restriction of Humpback Dolphins to a narrow coastal belt of shallow water makes them susceptible to human TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None activities occurring in both the terrestrial and the marine CITES listing (1979) Appendix I environments. Ongoing coastal development (construed as proportional to general urban expansion) of 5.6–8.6% CMS listing Appendix II between 2000 and 2013 in Western Cape, Eastern Cape, Endemic No and KwaZulu-Natal, and increasing boat traffic, especially in estuaries and around harbours, continues to negatively *Watch-list Data impact foraging and nursery areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Kwazulu-Natal
    KwaZulu-Natal Introduction South Africa’s third-smallest province, KwaZulu-Natal, is also one of its most exciting – it has a wealth of scenic and cultural attractions that include the country’s most developed beaches south and north of Durban (the third-largest city in South Africa), as well as isolated, almost untouched beaches; world-famous game reserves; two UNESCO World Heritage Sites; and some of the South Africa’s most famous historic battlefields. Top attractions Golden beaches and year-round sunshine Choose one of Durban’s popular beaches with amenities galore plus superb surfing, or make your way north to the Dolphin or Elephant coasts, or south to the Hibiscus Coast and Golf Coast. Wherever you find sand and sea, though, you’re almost guaranteed good weather. Sodwana Bay is a diving and fishing mecca. Game parks KwaZulu-Natal’s game parks, although not so well known internationally and much smaller in scale than the Kruger National Park, are nonetheless teeming with game. Hluhluwe- iMfolozi – only a 20th the size of its big brother – seems wilder and freer in some ways, chiefly because, other than its award-winning Hilltop Camp, none of the smaller camps are fenced off. There are also superb private game reserves such as Phinda (Pinda) Private Game Reserve. The Drakensberg mountains This magnificent mountain range, the largest part of which is in KwaZulu-Natal, borders the tiny mountain kingdom of Lesotho and stretches from KwaZulu-Natal’s south-west right up to the Kruger National Park. The entire mountain range traverses the Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga and ends in Limpopo.
    [Show full text]
  • Isimangaliso Wetland Park Integrated Management Plan (2017 – 2021)
    iSIMANGALISO WETLAND PARK: INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PLAN (2017 – 2021) iSimangaliso Wetland Park Integrated Management Plan (2017 – 2021) Draft IMP Minister’s Foreword ii © - iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority iSIMANGALISO WETLAND PARK: INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PLAN (2017 – 2021) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................... vii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... viii 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Integrated Management Plan................................................................................. 1 1.2 Enabling Legal Framework ............................................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 World Heritage Convention and Operational Guidelines ................................................. 2 1.2.2 World Heritage Convention Act, 1999 (Act 49 of 1999) ..................................................
    [Show full text]