S.R. Bommai Vs Union of India on 11 March, 1994 Supreme Court of India S.R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

S.R. Bommai Vs Union of India on 11 March, 1994 Supreme Court of India S.R S.R. Bommai vs Union Of India on 11 March, 1994 Supreme Court of India S.R. Bommai vs Union Of India on 11 March, 1994 Equivalent citations: 1994 AIR 1918, 1994 SCC (3) 1 Author: K Singh Bench: Pandian, S.R. (J), Ahmadi, A.M. (J) (J), Verma, J.S. (J) Sawant, P.B., Ramaswamy, K. & Agrawal, S.C. (J), Yogeshwar Dayal Reddy, B.P. (J) PETITIONER: S.R. BOMMAI Vs. RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA DATE OF JUDGMENT11/03/1994 BENCH: KULDIP SINGH (J) BENCH: KULDIP SINGH (J) SAWANT, P.B. RAMASWAMY, K. AGRAWAL, S.C. (J) YOGESHWAR DAYAL (J) JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) PANDIAN, S.R. (J) PANDIAN, S.R. (J) AHMADI, A.M. (J) CITATION: 1994 AIR 1918 1994 SCC (3) 1 JT 1994 (2) 215 1994 SCALE (2)37 ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: The Judgments of the Court were delivered by S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.- I have had the privilege of going through the erudite and scholarly judgments of my learned brothers making an exhaustive and in-depth analysis, evaluating the constitutional mechanism and exploring the whole realm of constitutional imperatives as envisaged by the Founding Fathers of the Indian Constitution on Central- State relations and throwing abundant light on the controversial role of State Governors inviting President's Rule and the mode by which the Union Cabinet and Parliament discharged their Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/60799/ 1 S.R. Bommai vs Union Of India on 11 March, 1994 responsibility in this regard with reference to Articles 74(2), 163, 355, 356, 357 and the other allied constitutional provisions. 2. 1 find myself in agreement with the opinion of P.B. Sawant, J. on his conclusions 1, 2 and 4 to 8 with which B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J. concurs in his judgment (speaking for himself and on behalf of S.C. Agrawal, J.) but so far as the reasoning and other conclusions are concerned, I agree fully with the judgment of B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J. Yet I would like to give my brief opinion on the constitutional question of substantial importance in relation to the powers of the President to issue Proclamations under Article 356(1) of the Constitution. 3. The Indian Constitution is both a legal and social document. It provides a machinery for the governance of the country. It also contains the ideals expected by the nation. The political machinery created by the Constitution is a means to the achieving of this ideal. 4. To what extent we have been successful in achieving the constitutional ideals is a question with a wide spectrum which needs an elaborate debate. Harking back to the question involved in this case, the Framers of the Constitution met and were engaged for months together with the formidable task of drafting the Constitution on the subject of Centre State relationship that would solve all the problems pertaining thereto and frame a system which would enure for a long time to come. During the debates and deliberations, the issues that seemed to crop up at every point was the States' rights vis-a-vis the Central rights. Some of tile members seem to have expressed their conflicting opinions and different reasoning and sentiments on every issue influenced and inspired by the political ideology to which they were wedded. The two spinal issues before the Constituent Assembly were (1) what powers were to be taken away from the States; and (2) how could a national supreme Government be formed without completely eviscerating the power of the State. Those favoring the formation of a strong Central Government insisted that the said Government should enjoy supreme power while others supporting States' rights expostulated that view. The two sides took turns making their representations but finally realising that all might be lost, they reached a compromise that resolved the deadlock on the key issue and consequently the present form of Government, more federal in structure, came into being instead of a unitary Government. established by the people of India for themselves for their own governance and not for the governance of individual States. Resultantly, the Constitution acts directly on the people by means of power communicated directly from the people. 6. In regard to the Centre State relationship there are various reports suggesting certain recommendations for the smooth relationship of both the Governments without frequently coming into conflicts thereby creating constitutional crisis. The reports suggesting recommendations are that of (1) Administrative Reforms Commission 1969; (2) Rajmannar Committee 1969; and (3) Sarkaria Commission 1987. 7. When the question with regard to the Centre State relations stands thus, the publication issued by the Lok Sabha Secretariat giving an analytical tabular form with significant details pertaining to the President's Proclamation made under Article 356(1) of the Constitution and under Section 51 of the Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/60799/ 2 S.R. Bommai vs Union Of India on 11 March, 1994 Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 during the last 41 years of the Republic, that is up to 1991, indicates the frequency of user of Article 356(1). It appears from the summary table given in the tabular form (Appendix IV) that on 82 occasions the President's Rule in States have been imposed by invoking or resorting to Article 356(1) and on 13 occasions the President's Rule have been imposed in Union Territories including erstwhile Union Territories which have become States under Section 51 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963. All total up to 95 times, of which on 23 occasions the assemblies were dissolved on the advice of the Chief Ministers/or due to their resignations. It may be recalled that on 18 occasions the assemblies suspended were subsequently revived. The above statistics does not include the Proclamations which are presently under challenge before us. We may hasten to add that the Proclamations were made on different occasions on the advice of the Council of Ministers of the Central Government belonging to different political complexions. Some of the States, dissolved valiantly fought, honorably bled and pathetically lost their legal battle. 8. Since my learned brothers have elaborately dealt with the constitutional provisions relating to the issue of the Proclamation and as I am in agreement with the reasoning given by B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J., it is not necessary for me to make further discussion on this matter except saying that I am of the firm opinion that the power under Article 356 should be used very sparingly and only when President is fully satisfied that a situation has arisen where the Government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. Otherwise, the frequent use of this power and its exercise are likely to disturb the constitutional balance. Further if the Proclamation is freely made, then the Chief Minister of every State who has to discharge his constitutional functions will be in perpetual fear of the axe of Proclamation falling on him because he will not be sure whether he will remain in power or not and consequently he has to stand up every time from his seat without properly discharging his constitutional obligations and achieving the desired target in the interest of the State. 9. All the matters are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. AHMADI, J.-I have had the advantage of perusing the views expressed by my esteemed colleagues P.B. Sawant, K. Ramaswamy and B.P. Jeevan Reddy, JJ. and while I am largely in agreement with the 'conclusions' recorded by K. Ramaswamy, J., I would like to briefly indicate the area of my agreement. 11. In a country geographically vast, inhabited by over 850 million people belonging to different religions, castes and creeds, majority of them living in villages under different social orders and in abject poverty, with a constant tug of war between the organised and the unorganised sectors, It is not Surprising that problems crop up time and again requiring strong and at times drastic State action to preserve the unity and integrity of the country. Notwithstanding- these problems arising from time to time on account of class conflicts, religious intolerance and socioeconomic imbalances, the fact remains that India has a reasonably stable democracy. The resilience of our Republic to face these challenges one after another has proved the peoples' faith in the political philosophy of socialism, secularism and democracy enshrined in the Preamble of our Constitution. Yet, the fact remains that the nation has had from time to time with increasing frequency to combat upheavals Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/60799/ 3 S.R. Bommai vs Union Of India on 11 March, 1994 occasioned on account of militancy, communal and class conflicts, politico-religious turmoils, strikes, bandhs and the like occurring in one corner of the country or the other, at times assuming ugly proportions. We are a crisis-laden country; crisis situations created by both external and internal forces necessitating drastic State action to preserve the security, unity and integrity of the country. To deal with such extraordinarily difficult situations exercise of emergency powers becomes an imperative. Such emergency powers existed under the Government of India Act, 1935, vide Sections 93 and 45 of that enactment. However, when similar powers were sought to be conferred on the President of India by the Constitution, there, was a strong opposition from many members of the Constituent Assembly, vide Constituent Assembly Debates on draft Articles 277 and 277-A. Dr Ambedkar pacified the members by stating : "In fact I share the sentiments expressed ... that the proper thing we ought to expect is that such articles will never be called into operation and that they would remain a dead letter.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter-4 Problem of Formation of Ministry In
    PROBLEM OF FORMATION OF MINISTRY IN CASE OF FRACTURED ELECTORAL VERDICT CHAPTER-4 PROBLEM OF FORMATION OF MINISTRY IN CASE OF FRACTURED ELECTORAL VERDICT The Constitution of India adopts the W estrninster model of parliamentary government. Although the model adopted by the Indian Constitution is a slightly modified version of the Westminster model of government, one of these important modifications being replacement of monarchy by a republican presidency. The President of India is elected and not a hereditary monarch, yet, the position of the President under the Constitution of India, corresponds to that of the King or the Queen in England. This concept was borrowed from the Constitution of Eire and the framers of the Constitution have tried to assimilate the position of an elected President with that of a hereditary Monarch. The President of India, under the constitutional scheme is the Head of State. The real executive power is vested in the Council of Minister headed by the Prime Minister. In the Westminster system where the Crown is the titular Head of State and the real executive power vests in the cabinet headed by the Prime Minister, the Crown appoints the Prime Minister, from amongst the members of Parliament, who is the actual Head of Government. The Prime Minister then selects his Cabinet, choosing its members from among the members of Parliament. The Prime Minister then recommends them to the Crown who then appoints the members of the cabinet. Led by the Prime Minister, the Cabinet is collectively responsible to the House of Commons. Theoretically, though, the Crown has unfettered choice in selecting the Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of India Civil Original Jurisdiction
    REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No. 439 of 2020 Shivraj Singh Chouhan & Ors. …Petitioners Versus Speaker Madhya Pradesh Legislative …Respondents Assembly & Ors. And with Writ Petition (C) No. 449 of 2020 J U D G M E N T Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J 1. An imbroglio in the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly over the purported resignations of twenty-two Members and several communications by the Governor to the Chief Minister to hold an immediate floor test have given rise to these writ petitions 1 under Article 32 of the Constitution. 2. The first writ petition has been instituted by ten Members of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly seeking a writ directing the Speaker, Chief Minister and Principal Secretary of the Legislative Assembly to hold a floor test in accordance with the directions issued by the Governor.1 The second writ petition has been instituted by the Madhya Pradesh Congress Legislature Party2 through its Chief Whip seeking diverse reliefs including: (i) A direction to the Union of India and the State of Karnataka to grant access to the officer bearers of the MP Congress Party to communicate with respondents five to nineteen (the Members of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly who have tendered their resignation); (ii) A declaration that respondents five to nineteen are in the illegal confinement of the Union of India, the State of Karnataka and the Bharatiya Janata Party3; (iii) A direction permitting and enabling respondents five to nineteen to participate
    [Show full text]
  • English Text.Pmd
    The Urs Era NS Shankar The Urs Era Tr: SR Ramakrishna, SN Deepak D Devaraj Urs Birth Centenary Committee Department of Backward Classes, Devaraj Urs Bhavan III Floor, Millers Tank Bed Area, Vasantanagar, Bengaluru- 560 052 The Urs Era 1 The Urs era- a biograhy of D Devaraj Urs written by NS Shankar Translated by SR Ramakrishna and SN Deepak Published by: D Devaraj Urs Birth Centenary Committee, Department of Backward Classes, Devaraj Urs Bhavan, III Floor, Millers Tank Bed Area, Vasantanagar, Bengaluru- 560 052 Book Design: NS Shankar Pages: 114+4 First print: 2018 © Department of Backward classes Disclaimer: the views expressed in this book are author’s alone. Either the government or the D Devaraj Urs birth centenary committe or the Department of backward classes are in no way to be held responsible. The Urs Era 2 ¹zÀÝgÁªÀÄAiÀÄå «zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-560 001 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12.07.2016 ¹JA/¦J¸ï/120/2016 Preface In celebrating the birth centenary of former Chief Minister D Devaraj Urs, it is the intention of the government to introduce to the new generation, the life and achievements of that illustrious leader who strove for the over all progress of the state. Seminars, publication of books, training camps for youth, plays, ballets- these are all planned for a whole year as part of the centenary celebrations. Devaraj Urs was a mass leader who emerged from among the people. Though he did not experience untouchability, inequality and humiliations first hand, he willed to uproot this inhuman system and succeeded. He firmly believed that unless the doors of power, wealth and opportunities were opened for everyone, development was not possible.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA Page 1 of 224
    http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 224 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 3645 of 1989 PETITIONER: S.R. BOMMAI RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/03/1994 BENCH: S. Ratnavel Pandian & A.M. Ahmadi & Kuldip Singh & J.S.Verma & P.B. Sawant & K. Ramaswamy & S.C. Agrawal & Yogeshwar Dayal & B.P. Jeevan Reddy JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT Delivered by S.R. PANDIAN J, K. RAMASWAMY J, JAGDISH SARAN VERMA J, P.B.SAWANT J, A.M. AHMADI J S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J. I have had the privilege of going through the erudite and scholarly judgments of my learned brothers making an exhaustive and in-depth analysis, evaluating the constitutional mechanism and exploring the whole realm of constitutional imperatives as envisaged by the Founding Fathers of the Indian Constitution on Central- State relations and throwing abundant light on the controversial role of State Governors inviting President's Rule and the mode by which the Union Cabinet and Parliament discharged their responsibility in this regard with reference to Articles 74(2), 163, 355, 356, 357 and the other allied constitutional provisions. 2. 1 find myself in agreement with the opinion of P.B. Sawant, J. on his conclusions 1, 2 and 4 to 8 with which B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J. concurs in his judgment (speaking for himself and on behalf of S.C. Agrawal, J.) but so far as the reasoning and other conclusions are concerned, I agree fully with the judgment of B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J. Yet I would like to give my brief opinion on the constitutional question of substantial importance in relation to the powers of the President to issue Proclamations under Article 356(1) of the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Parliamentary Information ______VOLUME LXV NO.4 DECEMBER 2019 ______
    The Journal of Parliamentary Information ________________________________________________________ VOLUME LXV NO.4 DECEMBER 2019 ________________________________________________________ LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI ___________________________________ The Journal of Parliamentary Information VOLUME LXV NO.4 DECEMBER 2019 CONTENTS PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES PROCEDURAL MATTERS PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS DOCUMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha Rajya Sabha State Legislatures RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST APPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted by the committees of Lok Sabha during 1 July to 30 September 2019 II. Statement showing the work transacted during the 249th Session of the Rajya Sabha III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of the States and Union Territories during the period 1 July to 30 September 2019 IV. List of Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President during the period 1 July to 30 September 2019 V. List of Bills passed by the Legislatures of the States and the Union Territories during the period 1 July to 30 September 2019 VI. Ordinances promulgated by the Union and State Governments during the period 1 July to 30 September 2019 VII. Party Position in the Lok Sabha and the Legislatures of the States and the Union Territories PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITES _________________________________________________________________________ CONFERENCES AND SYMPOSIA 4th South Asian Speakers' Summit on Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): The 4th South Asian Speakers' Summit on Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) was held in Male, Maldives on 1 and 2 September, 2019. The above event was organized by Inter-Parliamentary Union in partnership with the People’s Majlis of Maldives.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Political Scenario in Karnataka
    www.ijcrt.org © 2020 IJCRT | Volume 8, Issue 8 August 2020 | ISSN: 2320-2882 Changing Political Scenario in Karnataka D.Menaka Thammaiah Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Government First Grade College, H.S.R.Layout, Sector 1, 24th Main, 14th A Cross Bangalore- 560102. .Politics in Karnataka - Post-Independence to 1983 This phase is marked by Congress dominance and rule of two dominant castes i.e. Vokkaligas and Lingayats. Before state reorganization in 1956, most of the rural Mysore was dominated by Vokkaligas and had prominence in government. With the enlargement of the state in 1956 to include the Lingayat dominant districts of Bombay Karnataka, Lingayats gained ascendancy in the politics. (Manor,1977 pp1865,1867) The dominance of these two communities continued till 1969, when the Congress party at the national level underwent a transformation. In 1969, there was a split in Congress. The ruling elite in Karnataka which was in the opposite group of the Congress, referred to as the Syndicate, later known as Congress (O) found it difficult to continue in office. The Congress(R) emerged victorious in 1972 Assembly election. (Rajashekaraiah, 1987, pp 583-584) The trend of major caste domination in the state politics was broken, when Sri Devaraj Urs from a minority community and loyalist to Mrs. Indira Gandhi was chosen as the Chief minister of the state on 23rd March, 1972. Devaraj Urs was considered as the champion of the Backward classes in the state. He had many from backward classes, minorities and SCs / STs as ministers in his cabinet and council of ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol Iv Contents.Pmd
    SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (NDC) MEETINGS Five Decades of Nation Building (Fifty NDC Meetings) Vol - V (45th to 50th Meetings) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PLANNING COMMISSION Please Note: Every effort has been made to ensure that the contents of this publication, which has been compiled for making available at one place the Record of Discussions the fifty Meetings of the National Development Council, are as accurate as possible. However, considering that this voluminous publication has been brought out from the Records, some of which are very old, users are requested to refer to the original text in case of any doubt/dispute. CONTENTS 45th Meeting of NDC ...................................................................................................... 1 46th Meeting of NDC .................................................................................................... 31 47th Meeting of NDC .................................................................................................... 79 48th Meeting of NDC .................................................................................................. 137 49th Meeting of NDC .................................................................................................. 219 50st Meeting of NDC................................................................................................... 357 FORTY FIFTH MEETING OF THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL APRIL 5, 1993 SUMMARY RECORD GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PLANNING COMMISSION Forty Fifth NDC Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • Siddaramaiah Challenges BJP by Pleasing Lingayats and Veerashaivas
    Commentary Siddaramaiah Challenges BJP by Pleasing Lingayats and Veerashaivas S. RAJENDRAN KALABURAGI (GULBARGA), KARNATAKA, SEPTEMBER 24, 2017: A massive rally in Kalaburagi on Sunday demanding independent religion tag to Lingayatism. - PHOTO: ARUN KULKARNI - A massive rally in Kalaburagi on Sunday demanding independent religion tag to Lingayatism. With elections to the Karnataka Legislative Assembly scheduled on May 12, 2018, the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government has endorsed a long-standing demand by the Lingayat community in the State. S. Rajendran, Karnataka Representative, The Hindu Centre for Politics and Public Policy, points out that by placing the onus on the Union government, the Congress could stand to gain politically irrespective of whether the Bharatiya Janata Party-led Union government accepts the State government’s recommendation on Lingayats and Veerashaiva-Lingayats. ingayats and Veerashaiva-Lingayats, a dominant community with a major presence in the northern districts of Karnataka, have been up with a big L demand for several decades that they be considered as a separate religion away from Hinduism. The State government has little scope in meeting this demand and yet has sought to convey to the major community that an all-out effort will be made by the Congress party to classify it as a religious minority although this will bear fruits only if the Union government gives its concurrence. The Chief Minister of Karnataka, Siddaramaiah, known for his penchant for a social and secular outlook apart from his anti-religious stance has deftly played a caste card to woo the Lingayat community ahead of the all-important legislative assembly elections in the State, scheduled for May 2018.
    [Show full text]