DOCSLIB.ORG

Overwhelming Support for Valley Medical Center & UW Medicine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WINTER /SPRING 2011 Improving the Health of Our Community VALLEY VOICES 8 Overwhelming Support for Valley Medical Center & UW Medicine Affiliation 3 4 12 Treating Coronary VMC & UW #1 in WA for Artery Disease with Medicine Exploring Orthopedic Non-Emergency PCI Strategic Alliance Services A Message from the CEO Strategic Alliance a New Beginning for may have been a little unconventional at times, Valley Medical Center my focus is as intense as it was 27 years ago. This Alliance will be the pinnacle of years of sound fiscal At Valley Medical Center’s management that has allowed for tremendous growth Board meeting on January of our facilities, clinical programs, community 18, the CEOs of UW outreach, specialization and comprehensive subspecialty Medicine and Valley Medical capabilities … and it will also be a new beginning. Center signed a non-binding Letter of Intent to explore As we face the challenges of healthcare reform, budget a Strategic Alliance through deficits and a recession that has left many both which Valley would integrate uninsured and underinsured, this Alliance will ensure with UW Medicine. The Board of Commissioners that residents of this hospital district will continue then unanimously decided to evaluate and pursue to receive quality primary and specialty care close to this administrative recommendation which was met home, irrespective of their financial situation. Residents by spontaneous applause from a standing-room-only will also gain access to enhanced services, research, crowd of community and business leaders, elected medical teaching programs involving Residents and officials, physicians and staff. Fellows, in addition to clinical expertise from one of the top medical organizations in the country that trains Valley Medical Center and UW Medicine share a tomorrow’s leading physicians and medical scientists common mission and vision of providing outstanding today. I could not be more excited. clinical care with a firm commitment to patient safety and excellence. This decision provides exciting As we move forward with discussions with key opportunities to explore what can be accomplished stakeholders and the community, I am proud of what through combined efforts on important initiatives to our staff and community have accomplished at Valley benefit the residents of South King County. by being able to attract the world-class UW Medicine organization and I am thrilled about the possibilities If this Strategic Alliance advances, it will be the most of the future. significant achievement of my career as CEO of Valley Medical Center. When I was hired in 1983 to be the Remarkable things are truly happening at Valley CEO of Valley General Hospital (as it was called at Medical Center! that time), I committed to ensuring that residents of this community had access to state-of-the-art facilities, technology and services as well as first-rate staff and physicians. While my management style Rich Roodman, CEO, Valley Medical Center Turn to page 4 to read about VMC’s potential strategic alliance with UW Medicine! Cover photo: Charles Cortes/Renton Reporter 2 VALLEY VOICES • Winter/Spring 2011 Treating Coronary Artery Disease Through Non-Emergency PCI Coronary Artery Disease Terminology ■■ Coronary angiogram: A test in which a small catheter is guided through a vein or artery into the heart. Dye is given through the catheter, and moving x-ray pictures are made as the dye travels through the heart. This comprehensive test shows: narrowing in the arteries, outside heart size, inside chamber Vance, Valley size, pumping ability of the heart, Medical Center PCI patient ability of the valves to open and close, as well as a measurement of the pressures within the heart chambers and arteries. A heart attack, or myocardial infarction, occurs when one or more regions of the heart muscle experience a severe or prolonged lack of oxygen caused by blocked ■■ Coronary angioplasty: A small balloon is inflated inside the blocked blood flow to the heart muscle. The blockage is often a result of a buildup of plaque, artery to open the blocked area. composed of fat deposits, cholesterol and other substances. Plaque ruptures and ■■ eventually a blood clot forms. The actual cause of a heart attack is a blood clot that Coronary artery stent: A tiny coil is expanded inside the artery to open forms within the plaque-obstructed area which stops the flow of blood. the blocked area and is left in place Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), also known as to keep the artery open. coronary angioplasty, is a procedure to treat the buildup of plaque, creating a bigger opening in the coronary arteries to permit more blood flow to the heart. For many years, Valley Medical Center cardiologists have performed PCI on those hospitalized with a heart attack or with John Nemanich, MD life threatening coronary blockage. While this service continues, just over a year ago VMC added non-emergency PCI as a treatment option. According to interventional cardiologist John Nemanich, MD, “Non-emergency PCI allows the patient to receive a diagnostic angiogram and if a lesion or blockage BEFORE PCI - Blockage is found, the interventional PCI treatment can be performed during the same procedure. It saves the patient from having to undergo two procedures, shortens the length of hospitalization and most importantly, might prevent a heart attack from occurring.” “People who are hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome—chest pain that would likely lead to heart attack—or those with chest pain which significantly impacts their lives, are potential candidates for non-emergency PCI,” says Dr. Nemanich. “Since we’ve been doing this procedure, probably half of our PCI patients have undergone the procedure on a non-emergency basis. PCI can be so beneficial. Most patients experience a significant improvement in the quality of AFTER PCI - Flow Restored their lives. The restored blood flow to the heart helps them feel much better and many can even start exercising again.” VALLEY VOICES • Winter/Spring 2011 3 Valley Medical Center Announces the Exciting Exploration of a Strategic Alliance with UW Medicine Valley Medical Center (VMC) is pleased to announce that the CEOs of UW Medicine and Valley Medical Center signed a non-binding Letter of Intent on January 18, 2011 to explore the feasibility of a strategic alliance. By integrating VMC with the UW Medical Health System, the alliance could: ■■ increase access to healthcare services for South King County residents; improve efficiency of care; align best practice models ■■ expand clinical, teaching and research programs ■■ position both organizations for future Center, Harborview Medical Center, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research healthcare reform opportunities, such UW Neighborhood Clinics, UW Center, and Children’s University as the creation of an Accountable Physicians, Airlift NW, UW School of Medical Group with Seattle Children’s Care Organization (ACO). Medicine and Northwest Hospital. UW Hospital. The components of UW Medicine Medicine also shares in the ownership VMC’s in-depth evaluation with UW Health System currently include: and governance of Seattle Cancer Care Medicine will include the exploration University of Washington Medical Alliance with Seattle Children’s Hospital of the development of an ACO as a proactive response to meeting the challenges of healthcare reform. “UW Medicine and Valley Medical Center share a Benefits to VMC and the commitment to providing outstanding clinical care Community with an emphasis on patient safety and service. Both organizations share a history A strategic alliance would support our mission and vision of providing outstanding of improving the health of the public and would clinical care with a firm commitment enhance our ability to provide national leadership to patient safety and excellence for healthcare reform.” – Dr. Paul Ramsey, CEO, and a shared mission of improving UW Medicine and Dean, UW School of Medicine community health. VMC is interested in exploring the possible expansion of: 4 VALLEY VOICES • Winter/Spring 2011 ■■ Enhanced, specialized services on the VMC main campus and in “With this strategic alliance, we would be able South King County to give our local community access to additional ■■ Enhanced, continued medical clinical services, as well as an additional depth of education and clinical research sub-specialization through the expertise of one of opportunities on the VMC campus the top medical organizations in the United States. VMC brings community focus, a personalized and ■■ Joint community education contemporary patient environment, and a history programs of great clinical outcomes and technical innovation. Combining these Such enhancements should provide features with the excellence of UW Medicine’s clinical, teaching and a broader range of local services for research programs would certainly be a benefit to the residents of residents in the hospital district. Southeast King County.” – Rich Roodman, CEO, Valley Medical Center VMC’s Assets Would Remain District Assets might seek and receive active UW and continue to support their local, Public district hospitals are allowed to clinical appointments. Private practice individual organizations. physicians will continue their privileges affiliate, merge or jointly operate with Alliance with an Organization other public or nonprofit entities under at VMC. It is envisioned that VMC employees, including management Like UW Medicine is Consistent Washington law. Under the proposed with VMC’s Mission alliance, the District would continue level employees, would continue to ownership of its hospital, neighborhood work for VMC. VMC is, and will remain, a community-focused organization. The clinics and other assets and liabilities. All District Board of Commissioners tax revenue would be used exclusively non-binding Letter of Intent enables Would Remain Intact: New Board VMC to explore how a strategic alliance for the benefit of the District and not be Would Oversee VMC Management spent outside the District. The strategic would further enhance its mission. The District’s Board of Commission- alliance would adopt centralized ers would continue as it currently exists.
Recommended publications
  • A Note from King County Elections

    A Note from King County Elections

    55 A note from King County Elections This edition of the voters’ pamphlet includes only the contests for which candidates submitted statements. Other contests, not included in this pamphlet, may appear on your ballot. The following content, in the form of candidate statements and ballot measure pro, con and rebuttals, are solely the responsibility of the those submitting the statements. This information is not verified or endorsed by King County Elections. Explanatory statements for all ballot measures and resolutions are prepared or approved by the jurisdiction’s attorney. The complete text of the ballot measures can be found online at www.kingcounty.gov/elections . Table of contents King County ........................................ 56 Hospital District................................... 93 Court of Appeals ................................. 61 Airport District ..................................... 94 Port of Seattle ..................................... 62 Cemetery District ................................ 95 Cities and Towns ................................ 65 Park and Recreation Districts ............. 96 School Districts ................................... 76 King County Charter Amendments ..... 99 Fire Districts ........................................ 86 Text of Charter Amendments ............ 103 Water Districts .................................... 89 Local Propositions ............................ 106 Utility District ....................................... 90 Additional Voting Information ............ 112 Sewer Districts ...................................
  • Port of Seattle in Violation of Federal Grant Assurance C.6 and State RCW 53.54.020

    Port of Seattle in Violation of Federal Grant Assurance C.6 and State RCW 53.54.020

    - Port of Seattle in violation of Federal Grant Assurance C.6 And State RCW 53.54.020 Contents: Item #1: Letter from U.S. Congressman Adam Smith dated May 27, 1998 asking for a GAO Audit. Item #2: Letter to FAA from Shawn M. Lewis, Manager for Special Investigations, State Auditors Office dated June 17, 1998. Letter to Shawn Lewis from Minnie 0. Brasher dated June 22,1998. Item #3: Letter from State Representative Karen Keiser and State Senator Julia Patterson dated June I 0, 1998 to The Seattle Times. Item #4: Memos from Minnie 0. Brasher to Elected Officials. Item #5: Violations of Federal Grant Assurance C.6 from 1990 to 1994 reported by Deloitte & Touche, auditors for the port of Seattle. Item #6: Letters from FAR-150 Governments with land use control, i.e. governments that represent the people. Item #7: The port applied for and received more than $100,000,000 million federal dollars for FAR 150 Noise Compatibility Program at Sea-Tac Airport under Federal Grant Agreement Assurance C.6. Item #8: Part 150 -Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. (Also known as FAR 150); and Advisory Circular- Noise Control and Compatibility Planning for Airports. Item #9: Acceptance letters from FAA to the Port of Seattle on Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Program, dated April 16, 1993 and May 25, 1993. Item #10: RCW 53.54.020, Noise Mediation Agreement and letter from Dennis Ossenkop, FAA, dated March 19, 1992. Item #11: Court Ruling: Compliance with FAR 150 regulations becomes mandatory after a plan is approved by the FAA and federal funding is granted.
  • Volume I: Corridor Management Plan for Des Moines Memorial Drive

    Volume I: Corridor Management Plan for Des Moines Memorial Drive

    Volume I: Corridor Management Plan for Des Moines Memorial Drive January 2005 Prepared for: City of Burien, Washington City of Des Moines, Washington City of Normandy Park, Washington City of SeaTac, Washington King County, Washington Under the Guidance of Plan Steering Committee: Des Moines Memorial Drive Advisory Committee Rose Clark, Co-Chair Corbit Loch, Co Chair Interlocal Agency Project Management and Support: King County Department of Transportation, Road Services Division King County Landmarks Robert Eichelsdoerfer, P.E., Project Manager Prepared by: SB & Associates, Inc. Susan Black, Project Manager, Project Communications, and Outreach Jay Rood, Principal Planner Anri Rapelje, Project Planner Rachael Watland, Project Planner Katherine Duncan, Project Planner In association with: Kay Reinartz, PhD., Cultural and Heritage Consulting Maggie Smith, Public Artist Jon Gierlich, Public Artist Des Moines Memorial Drive Advisory Committee Voting Members: Evert Carter, Burien American Legion Post 134 Arlene J. Carter, Burien American Legion Auxiliary Rose Clark, Citizen Representative, City of Normandy Park (Formerly Burien Councilmember and Committee Co-Chair) Tom Files, Citizen Representative, City of Burien George Hadley, Councilmember, City of Normandy Park (Formerly Normandy Park Citizen Representative) Claire Henson, Citizen Representative, King County/Boulevard Park community Diane Kennish, Citizen Representative, City of Des Moines Lucy Krakowiak, Councilmember, City of Burien Kitty Milne, Trustee/Former President, Highline Historical
  • SOUND TRANSIT BOARD MEETING Summary Minutes June 27, 2013

    SOUND TRANSIT BOARD MEETING Summary Minutes June 27, 2013

    T SouNDTRANsrr SOUND TRANSIT BOARD MEETING Summary Minutes June 27, 2013 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 1:36 p.m. by Vice Chair Julia Patterson, in the Ruth Fisher Boardroom, 401 South Jackson Street, Seattle, Washington. ROLL CALL Chair Vice Chairs (A) Pat McCarthy, Pierce County Executive (P) Julia Patterson, King County Councilmember (P) Paul Roberts, Everett Councilmember Board members (A) Claudia Balducci, Bellevue Councilmember (P) Mike McGinn, City of Seattle Mayor (P) Fred Butler, Issaquah Council President (P) Mary Moss, Lakewood Councilmember (A) Richard Conlin, Seattle Councilmember (A) Lynn Peterson, WSOOT Secretary (P) Dow Constantine, King County Executive (P) Larry Phillips, King County Councilmember (P) Dave Earling, City of Edmonds Mayor (P) Marilyn Strickland, City of Tacoma Mayor (P) David Enslow, City of Sumner Mayor (P) Peter von Reichbauer, King County (P) John Marchione, City of Redmond Mayor Councilmember (P) Joe McDermott, King County Councilmember Ms. Marcia Walker, Board Administrator announced that a quorum of the Board was not present at roll call. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Vice Chair Patterson announced that the Board was working from a revised agenda. The agenda was revised to include a report on Tacoma Link Fares. Also, Motion No. M2013-35 is being removed from the Consent Agenda, and is now item 8.B. under the Business Items. Boardmember request to call in Vice Chair Patterson announced that Boardmember Peterson and Boardmember Roberts asked to participate in today's meeting by phone. The Board Rules and Operating Procedures allow members to attend meetings by teleconference with a two-thirds affirmative vote of those members in attendance.

  • 2017 Annual Report You Will Find the Groundbreaking Effort

    “ It is a privilege and honor to serve as MISSION current Board President for the KYFS KYFS promotes healthy development of children, Board of Directors. The services KYFS youth and families in South King County by providing Message offers and supports in the community professional counseling, education and support services. are integral to developing the future On behalf of Kent Youth and Family Services, Board of Kent. Educating the community STATEMENT OF VISION of Directors, President Brandy Reed, KYFS staff and about tolerance and equality for all Helping youth and families achieve their goals for a who live here, while respecting one better future. volunteers and most importantly the children, youth another is crucial to ensuring a and families who turn to KYFS for assistance, “thank you” healthy community to thrive in.” VALUE STATEMENT to each of you who supported KYFS throughout 2017. - Brandy Reed, Board President Equity and cultural inclusion, accountability, partnering, advocacy, and responsive to clients and community. The KYFS Board of Directors adopted Investigative Unit as part of the “sting” a new Strategic Plan in February 2017 operations KPD and other local/regional culminating the yearlong work of staff and law enforcement conduct. In the final Contents board towards this goal. You’ll note the quarter of 2017 the KYFS CSEC Case new Mission Statement and newly created Manager worked with 15 trafficked young Message from Mike Heinisch .....................................................................................................................
  • Appendix a Public Involvement Plan

    Appendix a Public Involvement Plan

    SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL APPENDIX A PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN This appendix presents the Public Involvement Program plan that was developed for this Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. This plan was prepared in March 2010 and served to guide the public involvement process throughout the course of the study. The elements of the public consultation and involvement process included: Technical Review Committee Public Information Workshops Community Meetings Port of Seattle Commission Meetings Newsletters Website Technical Document Public Hearing Additional information regarding these elements is included in Chapter Seven, Consultation. Additional documentation, such as meeting minutes, presentation materials, and public comments, are included in subsequent appendices. Landrum & Brown Appendix A – Public Involvement Plan October 2013 SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Landrum & Brown Appendix A – Public Involvement Plan October 2013 Seattle­Tacoma International Airport Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update Public Involvement Program March 2010 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE PART 150 PROCESS .............................................................................................................1 ELEMENTS OF THE PART 150 STUDY.........................................................................................................................1
  • Washington's New Top 2 Primary

    Washington's New Top 2 Primary

    STATE OF WASHINGTON Look inside for more about the Top 2 Primary VOTERS’’PAMPHLET VOTERS PAMPHLET August 19, 2008 Primary Washington’s New Top 2 Primary Washington has a new primary. You do not have Each candidate for partisan offi ce may state a political to pick a party. In each race, you may vote for any party that he or she prefers. A candidate’s preference one of the candidates listed. Th e two candidates does not imply that the candidate is nominated or who receive the most votes in the August Primary endorsed by the party, or that the party approves will advance to the November General Election. of or associates with that candidate. Look inside for more about the Top 2 Primary. PUBLISHED BY THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND KING COUNTY ELECTIONS EDITION 15G Introduction to the 2008 Primary Voters’ Pamphlet It’s your choice … it’s your voice. Dear King County voter: Congratulations on exercising your privilege and responsibility A lot has changed since the last presidential election in 2004. to take part in Washington’s elections − never more important Since then, King County Elections has worked tirelessly to than in this watershed 2008 election year. Our new Top 2 implement more than 300 reforms and recommendations Primary on August 19 will give you maximum choice, allowing resulting from outside audits, election experts, and the you the independence and freedom to “vote for the person, innovative work of elections staff. With these changes and not the party.” 19 successful elections behind us, King County is ready and energized for the August 19 primary.