DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Landowner's Guide to Field Grading Hardwood Trees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Landowner's Guide to Field Grading Hardwood Trees DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARC H & EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA5015 Forest Landowner’s Guide to Field Grading Hardwood Trees Kyle Cunningham Many forest landowners own economic value. Therefore, this fact hardwood stands and are not aware of sheet will refer to tree grade and AssociateExtension Instructor Professor - of the great differences in quality and butt-log grade interchangeably. Forestry value between individual trees within these stands. Tree (or log) grade, among other factors, is essential in determining the quality and economic value of hardwood trees. The objective of this fact sheet will be to explain the tree grading process in a simple, straightforward manner. Why Is Tree Grade Important? Because grading is the method for estimating the wood quality a particular tree may produce, it provides information for establishing Figure 1. Log locations within the main a tree’s monetary value. If a land- stem of a tree. owner is interested in timber produc- tion, maintaining higher grade trees is important. The reason for this prin - Because grade is the determining ciple is simple: high-grade trees factor in establishing the type of saw- contain much more economic value timber product (or products) a tree than low-grade trees. If a forest may produce, grades are typically landowner is interested in economic applied to sawlog-size trees return, tree grade is as important as (diameter > 12 inches). tree volume in determining the rate of return for a hardwood stand. Field Grades Three field grades are used to What Is a Tree Grade? rank the quality of tree logs: F1, F2 Tree grade is a measure used to and F3. An F1 tree grade represents express a tree’s wood quality. Grade is stems capable of producing large determined using the amount of clear amounts of high-quality wood wood (defect-free stem length) within products. This means that F1 grade the butt-log portion of a tree trees will produce a large proportion (Figure 1). The butt-log of a tree is the of wood that can be used for furniture, Arkansas Is lowest 16-foot section above the stump flooring, dimension lumber and other height (approximately 1.5 feet). high-value wood products. Our Campus Though the upper-logs may be graded at a sawmill, the butt-log is generally An F2 tree grade represents stems the portion used to establish a stand- capable of producing some high-value wood products but not enough to be Visit our web site at: ing tree’s grade because this portion http ://www.uaex .edu contains the majority of a tree’s ranked as a grade F1. University of Arkansas, United States Department of Agriculture, and County Governments Cooperating An F3 tree grade represents stems containing a of a tree log. It is used to determine how much wood small proportion of high­value wood products. F3 can be extracted from a log. Because it is difficult to grade stems will often be used for pallet or contain­ obtain this measurement from standing trees, an er material. assumption is applied that the SD is equal to 80 percent of a tree’s DBH (Table 1). Therefore, a tree If a sawtimber­size hardwood tree does not with a 20­inch DBH would have a 16­inch SD contain enough quality to make grade F3, it is classi­ (20 × 0.80 = 16). The 80 percent figure refers to a fied as “no grade” and will either be used as pulp­ tree’s “form class,” which expresses the ratio between wood, tie­logs, other products or be determined DBH and SD. Most sawtimber­size hardwood trees “non­merchantable” (or cull). have a form class near 80 percent. Components of Tree Grade Table 1. Estimated Scaling Diameter for Form Tree Size Class 80 Trees One of the most important aspects of tree DBH SD grading is the size or diameter at breast height (inches) (inches) (DBH = diameter of tree at 4.5 feet above ground) of 12 10 a tree. First, there are differing minimum DBH sizes 14 11 required for a tree log to be considered an F1, F2 or 16 13 F3 grade. For example, a tree must have a DBH of at 18 14 least 16 inches to be a candidate for a grade F1, at least 13 inches for grade F2 or at least 10 inches for 20 16 grade F3. 22 18 24 19 Also based on DBH, there are varying lengths of clear wood (defect­free sections) required to make a 26 21 specific tree grade. For example, a tree with a DBH of 28 22 20 inches must have two clear sections of wood that 30 24 are each a minimum of 5 feet in length to be a grade F1. However, a 16­inch DBH tree would need two clear sections that are a minimum of 7 feet in length. Grading Faces Essentially, smaller diameter trees require longer lengths of clear wood to make a grade. Establishing grading faces is another key component in determining tree grade. Typically four equal sections are established by dividing the butt­log Scaling Diameter vertically (Figure 2). The first face is established by Scaling diameter (SD) is another important placing as many defects as possible into one grading measure used in tree grading. The SD can be defined face. This grading face becomes the “worst face” as the diameter (inside bark) at the small (or top) end because it contains the highest proportion of tree . Figure 2. Establishing 4 grading faces on the butt­log. Source: Rast and others, USDA Forest Service, 1973 defects and the least amount of clear wood. The is considered a defect. On trees with a scaling remaining three grading faces are established by diameter 14 inches or larger, count every other vertically dividing the remainder of the butt­log into epicormic branch (> 3/8 inch) as a defect. three equal sections. It is important to note that the second worst grading face of the butt­log will be used to determine a tree’s grade. Tree Defects Being able to identify tree defects is essential in accurately establishing a tree grade. These defects can include knots, epicormic branching, decay, frac­ tures and/or crook and sweep. Tree defects directly affect tree grade in that they reduce the length of defect­free stem sections in the butt­log. – Knots are probably the most common defect found on hardwood logs. Knots are simply theKnots remnants of old limbs (Figure 3). As a forest stand develops, some of the lower limbs of trees are shaded and eventually die and fall off. The point on the trunk where the limb prunes itself establishes a knot. All knots are counted as defects, because they affect the wood all the way to the core (or pith) of the stem. Figure 4. Example of epicormic branching. – Stress fractures may include frost cracks, seams or splits. The major determina­Stress Fractures tion that must be made with a stress fracture is whether or not it is on the surface only or extends into the interior of the trunk. For stress fractures that extend into the interior of the trunk, measure the length affected to be counted as a defect. – In standard log grading, crook, sweep and decay areAssumptions for Decay, Crook and Sweep handled by one of two methods: (1) use a series of formulas derived by the USDA Forest Service based on the length and severity of the defect or (2) simply reduce the length of the log so that it does not include the portion with the defect (remembering a log must be at least 12 feet in length). To keep things less compli cated, this fact sheet will only demonstrate the formula for sweep (which is straightforward). Crook Figure 3. Example of a knot. and decay will be handled by reducing the log length – Hardwood trees contain to exclude the defect. dormant buds all along their trunks. Given the rightEpicormic Branches conditions (light, stress and others), these buds are – Decay or rot triggered to sprout a new limb on the trunk of a tree may be caused by severalDecay called an “epicormic branch” (Figure 4). Timber factors, but it is always buyers will usually not grade a tree very high if it viewed as a defect. Decay contains epicormic branching. However, epicormic may be initiated by fire branching is often not as severe as it appears. In damage (Figure 5), insects, most cases, the majority of epicormic branches occur disease, mechanical dam­ above the butt­log of a tree (remember the butt­log age and/or others. In contains most of the economic value). Also, epicormic standing trees, it may be branches must be 3/8 inch in diameter or larger to be difficult to determine the considered a defect. On trees with a scaling diameter area of the trunk affected under 14 inches, every epicormic branch (> 3/8 inch) by decay because only the Figure 5. Example of decay. exterior damage can be viewed. When establishing the length of the trunk affected by decay, a measure Clear Cuttings of the length of the exterior decay and an estimate of Clear cuttings are sections of clear wood or the length of interior decay should be determined. defect­free stem in a grading face (Figure 8). These This portion of the log should be excluded, if possible, sections are used to establish the grade of a particu­ and the resulting shorter log is then graded. lar face. Clear cuttings involve two primary charac­ teristics: (1) the number of cuttings present and – Sweep and crook refer to (2) the length of each cutting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tree Planting Guide
    City of Bellingham Tree Planting Guide This guide provides you with resources for planting trees in the city. Using the right tree in the right place, and maintaining it correctly will provide healthy, beautiful trees whose benefits can be enjoyed by the community for many years. Why plant trees? ....................... page 1 Get a Street Tree Permit First.... page 2 Check the Site & Choose the Right Tree……........ page 3 Plant it Right………………...……page 4 Four trees are removed for every one planted in most American cities. Help it Grow ……...……………… pg 5 & 6 A single large average tree absorbs 26 pounds of CO2 per year. Resources………………………… pg 6 Each vehicle spews out approximately 100 pounds of CO2 per year. Why Plant Trees? Trees in an urban area increase quality of life by: Air quality and cleansing - A typical person uses 386 lb. of oxygen per year. A healthy 32 ft. tall ash tree can produce about 260 lb. of oxygen annually. Two of these trees would supply the oxygen needs of a person each year! Improved water quality - The canopy of a street tree intercepts rain, reducing the amount of water that will fall on pavement and then be removed by a storm water system. Heating & Cooling Costs - A mature tree canopy reduces air temperatures by about 5 to 10° F, influencing the internal temperatures of nearby buildings. Trees divert wind in the winter and increase winter-time temperatures. Increased home sales prices - When homes with equivalent features are evaluated, a 6% increase to the value is associated with nearby trees. Soil Stabilization - Tree roots stabilize soil, helping to minimize erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Timber Forest Products
    Agrodok 39 Non-timber forest products the value of wild plants Tinde van Andel This publication is sponsored by: ICCO, SNV and Tropenbos International © Agromisa Foundation and CTA, Wageningen, 2006. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photocopy, microfilm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. First edition: 2006 Author: Tinde van Andel Illustrator: Bertha Valois V. Design: Eva Kok Translation: Ninette de Zylva (editing) Printed by: Digigrafi, Wageningen, the Netherlands ISBN Agromisa: 90-8573-027-9 ISBN CTA: 92-9081-327-X Foreword Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are wild plant and animal pro- ducts harvested from forests, such as wild fruits, vegetables, nuts, edi- ble roots, honey, palm leaves, medicinal plants, poisons and bush meat. Millions of people – especially those living in rural areas in de- veloping countries – collect these products daily, and many regard selling them as a means of earning a living. This Agrodok presents an overview of the major commercial wild plant products from Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific. It explains their significance in traditional health care, social and ritual values, and forest conservation. It is designed to serve as a useful source of basic information for local forest dependent communities, especially those who harvest, process and market these products. We also hope that this Agrodok will help arouse the awareness of the potential of NTFPs among development organisations, local NGOs, government officials at local and regional level, and extension workers assisting local communities. Case studies from Cameroon, Ethiopia, Central and South Africa, the Pacific, Colombia and Suriname have been used to help illustrate the various important aspects of commercial NTFP harvesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Old-Growth Forests
    Pacific Northwest Research Station NEW FINDINGS ABOUT OLD-GROWTH FORESTS I N S U M M A R Y ot all forests with old trees are scientifically defined for many centuries. Today’s old-growth forests developed as old growth. Among those that are, the variations along multiple pathways with many low-severity and some Nare so striking that multiple definitions of old-growth high-severity disturbances along the way. And, scientists forests are needed, even when the discussion is restricted to are learning, the journey matters—old-growth ecosystems Pacific coast old-growth forests from southwestern Oregon contribute to ecological diversity through every stage of to southwestern British Columbia. forest development. Heterogeneity in the pathways to old- growth forests accounts for many of the differences among Scientists understand the basic structural features of old- old-growth forests. growth forests and have learned much about habitat use of forests by spotted owls and other species. Less known, Complexity does not mean chaos or a lack of pattern. Sci- however, are the character and development of the live and entists from the Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station, dead trees and other plants. We are learning much about along with scientists and students from universities, see the structural complexity of these forests and how it leads to some common elements and themes in the many pathways. ecological complexity—which makes possible their famous The new findings suggest we may need to change our strat- biodiversity. For example, we are gaining new insights into egies for conserving and restoring old-growth ecosystems. canopy complexity in old-growth forests.
    [Show full text]
  • “Catastrophic” Wildfire a New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health by Chad Hanson, Ph.D
    John Muir Project Technical Report 1 • Winter 2010 • www.johnmuirproject.org The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health by Chad Hanson, Ph.D. Contents The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire: A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health 1 Preface 1 Executive Summary 4 Myths and Facts 6 Myth/Fact 1: Forest fire and home protection 6 Myth/Fact 2: Ecological effects of high-intensity fire 7 Myth/Fact 3: Forest fire intensity 12 Myth/Fact 4: Forest regeneration after high-intensity fire 13 Myth/Fact 5: Forest fire extent 14 Myth/Fact 6: Climate change and fire activity 17 Myth/Fact 7: Dead trees and forest health 19 Myth/Fact 8: Particulate emissions from high-intensity fire 20 Myth/Fact 9: Forest fire and carbon sequestration 20 Myth/Fact 10: “Thinning” and carbon sequestration 22 Myth/Fact 11: Biomass extraction from forests 23 Summary: For Ecologically “Healthy Forests”, We Need More Fire and Dead Trees, Not Less. 24 References 26 Photo Credits 30 Recommended Citation 30 Contact 30 About the Author 30 The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health ii The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire: A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health By Chad Hanson, Ph.D. Preface In the summer of 2002, I came across two loggers felling fire-killed trees in the Star fire area of the Eldorado National Forest in the Sierra Nevada. They had to briefly pause their activities in order to let my friends and I pass by on the narrow dirt road, and in the interim we began a conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Ecosystem Services: Cultural Values
    Trees At Work: Economic Accounting for Forest Ecosystem Services in the U.S. South 11 Chapter 2 Forest Ecosystem Services: Cultural Values Melissa M. Kreye, Damian C. Adams, Ramesh Ghimire, Wayde Morse, Taylor Stein, J.M. Bowker WHAT ARE CULTURAL SERVICES? associated ecosystem and human components. However, our understanding of the many factors that give rise to cultural ow we define “culture” and societal well-being related ecosystem services is still a matter of ongoing investigation. to culture depends heavily on who is looking at it, but culture can be generally described as “the customs and H There is good reason for investigating the cultural ecosystem beliefs of a particular group of people that are used to express service values associated with forests: they are critical to our their collectively held values” (Soulbury Commission 2012). understanding of the value of forest land and the benefits of In the context of forests, culturally derived norms, beliefs, forest conservation. The U.S. South is expected to lose 30-43 and values help drive preferences for forested landscapes and million forest acres to urbanization between 1997 and 2060 forest-based benefits such as diversity and identity, justice, (Wear and Greis 2002), and structural changes in southeastern education, freedom, and spirituality (Farber and others 2002, ecosystems are expected to impact the provision of a wide Fisher and others 2009, Kellert 1996). Environmental policies range of cultural ecosystem service benefits (Bowker and others and responsible forest management can enhance how forests 2013). Concurrently, social trends also suggest that youth are help give rise to and support cultural ecosystem service values.
    [Show full text]
  • Current U.S. Forest Data and Maps
    CURRENT U.S. FOREST DATA AND MAPS Forest age FIA MapMaker CURRENT U.S. Forest ownership TPO Data FOREST DATA Timber harvest AND MAPS Urban influence Forest covertypes Top 10 species Return to FIA Home Return to FIA Home NEXT Productive unreserved forest area CURRENT U.S. FOREST DATA (timberland) in the U.S. by region and AND MAPS stand age class, 2002 Return 120 Forests in the 100 South, where timber production West is highest, have 80 s the lowest average age. 60 Northern forests, predominantly Million acreMillion South hardwoods, are 40 of slightly older in average age and 20 Western forests have the largest North concentration of 0 older stands. 1-19 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-99 100- 120- 140- 160- 200- 240- 280- 320- 400+ 119 139 159 199 240 279 319 399 Stand-age Class (years) Return to FIA Home Source: National Report on Forest Resources NEXT CURRENT U.S. FOREST DATA Forest ownership AND MAPS Return Eastern forests are predominantly private and western forests are predominantly public. Industrial forests are concentrated in Maine, the Lake States, the lower South and Pacific Northwest regions. Source: National Report on Forest Resources Return to FIA Home NEXT CURRENT U.S. Timber harvest by county FOREST DATA AND MAPS Return Timber harvests are concentrated in Maine, the Lake States, the lower South and Pacific Northwest regions. The South is the largest timber producing region in the country accounting for nearly 62% of all U.S. timber harvest. Source: National Report on Forest Resources Return to FIA Home NEXT CURRENT U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood from Midwestern Trees Purdue EXTENSION
    PURDUE EXTENSION FNR-270 Daniel L. Cassens Professor, Wood Products Eva Haviarova Assistant Professor, Wood Science Sally Weeks Dendrology Laboratory Manager Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University Indiana and the Midwestern land, but the remaining areas soon states are home to a diverse array reforested themselves with young of tree species. In total there are stands of trees, many of which have approximately 100 native tree been harvested and replaced by yet species and 150 shrub species. another generation of trees. This Indiana is a long state, and because continuous process testifies to the of that, species composition changes renewability of the wood resource significantly from north to south. and the ecosystem associated with it. A number of species such as bald Today, the wood manufacturing cypress (Taxodium distichum), cherry sector ranks first among all bark, and overcup oak (Quercus agricultural commodities in terms pagoda and Q. lyrata) respectively are of economic impact. Indiana forests native only to the Ohio Valley region provide jobs to nearly 50,000 and areas further south; whereas, individuals and add about $2.75 northern Indiana has several species billion dollars to the state’s economy. such as tamarack (Larix laricina), There are not as many lumber quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), categories as there are species of and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) that trees. Once trees from the same are more commonly associated with genus, or taxon, such as ash, white the upper Great Lake states. oak, or red oak are processed into In urban environments, native lumber, there is no way to separate species provide shade and diversity the woods of individual species.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREST BIODIVERSITY Earth’S Living Treasure
    OLOGIC OR BI AL DI Y F VER DA SI L TY A 2 N 2 IO M T a A y N 2 R 0 E 1 T 1 N I FOREST BIODIVERSITY Earth’s Living Treasure INTERNATIONAL DAY FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 22 May 2011 FOREST BIODIVERSITY Earth’s Living Treasure Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. ISBN: 92-9225-298-4 Copyright © 2010, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views reported in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Convention on Biological Diversity. This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Secretariat of the Convention would appreciate receiving a copy of any publications that use this document as a source. Citation: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010). Forest Biodiversity—Earth’s Living Treasure. Montreal, 48 pages. For further information, please contact: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade Centre 413 St. Jacques Street, Suite 800 Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2Y 1N9 Phone: 1 (514) 288 2220 Fax: 1 (514) 288 6588 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cbd.int Design & typesetting: Em Dash Design Cover illustration: Cover illustration: Untitled, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Identification Guide
    2048 OPAL guide to deciduous trees_Invertebrates 592 x 210 copy 17/04/2015 18:39 Page 1 Tree Rowan Elder Beech Whitebeam Cherry Willow Identification Guide Sorbus aucuparia Sambucus nigra Fagus sylvatica Sorbus aria Prunus species Salix species This guide can be used for the OPAL Tree Health Survey and OPAL Air Survey Oak Ash Quercus species Fraxinus excelsior Maple Hawthorn Hornbeam Crab apple Birch Poplar Acer species Crataegus monogyna Carpinus betulus Malus sylvatica Betula species Populus species Horse chestnut Sycamore Aesculus hippocastanum Acer pseudoplatanus London Plane Sweet chestnut Hazel Lime Elm Alder Platanus x acerifolia Castanea sativa Corylus avellana Tilia species Ulmus species Alnus species 2048 OPAL guide to deciduous trees_Invertebrates 592 x 210 copy 17/04/2015 18:39 Page 1 Tree Rowan Elder Beech Whitebeam Cherry Willow Identification Guide Sorbus aucuparia Sambucus nigra Fagus sylvatica Sorbus aria Prunus species Salix species This guide can be used for the OPAL Tree Health Survey and OPAL Air Survey Oak Ash Quercus species Fraxinus excelsior Maple Hawthorn Hornbeam Crab apple Birch Poplar Acer species Crataegus montana Carpinus betulus Malus sylvatica Betula species Populus species Horse chestnut Sycamore Aesculus hippocastanum Acer pseudoplatanus London Plane Sweet chestnut Hazel Lime Elm Alder Platanus x acerifolia Castanea sativa Corylus avellana Tilia species Ulmus species Alnus species 2048 OPAL guide to deciduous trees_Invertebrates 592 x 210 copy 17/04/2015 18:39 Page 2 ‹ ‹ Start here Is the leaf at least
    [Show full text]
  • Homeowner's Tree Planting Guide
    Check out this thorough and useful “how to plant your trees” resource: www.arborday.org/trees/planting/ 1. Choose the Right Place 1. Mulch Look in all directions and account for the future development of Mulch can improve soil structure, increase organic matter & soil your tree. This includes identifying your tree species and allowing biology, reduce soil proper space for mature growth of your tree. compaction & • Account for realistic spacing amongst other vegetation erosion, and • Avoid planting near power lines or too close to structures conserve moisture Trees can only benefit future generations if they are given the levels within the soil. opportunity to sustainably develop and mature. Choosing the Cover the area right tree in the right place ensures there is a productive future around the tree with for your new planting as well as avoiding an undesirable future approximately 2- removal. 4inches of mulch. Avoid letting the 2. Remove Container/ Basket mulch rub against the Root mass is fragile so take concern to handle it gently trunk. Create a water • Carefully slide tree out of the container or cut wire holding swell above basket (if B&B) the root ball. • Straighten out and prune any girdling roots/ root mats • Dig out to trunk flare if necessary 2. Water Nursery grown trees often have circling roots. It is important to New trees are like babies- they need extra help and extra mitigate this problem during the planting phase. Roots are the attention during their early years. So, water your tree anchor, storage and nutrient providers of the tree. thoroughly after planting! Provide extra water within the first few weeks of establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Forest Certification on Biodiversity Marijke Van Kuijk, Francis E
    Effects of Forest Certification on Biodiversity Marijke van Kuijk, Francis E. Putz & Roderick Zagt Effects of Forest Certification on Biodiversity Marijke van Kuijk, Francis E. Putz and Roderick Zagt 2009 Copyright: © Tropenbos International All rights reserved. No part of this publication, apart from bibliographic data and brief quotations in critical reviews, may be reproduced, recorded or published in any form including print photocopy, microform, electronic or electromagnetic record without written permission. Citation: van Kuijk, M., Putz, F.E. and Zagt, R.J (2009) Effects of forest certification on biodiversity. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the Netherlands. ISBN: 978-90-5113-090-4 The authors: Marijke van Kuijk and Roderick Zagt are at Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Francis Putz is at the Department of Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. This study was commissioned by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL). PO Box 303, 3720 AH Bilthoven, the Netherlands. e: [email protected], t: +31.(0)30. 2743688, i: www.pbl.nl Design & Layout: Juanita Franco Cover photos: R. Zagt and TBI archive. Photos: FAO-mediabase, László Tóth (iv); J. van der Ploeg (xii); Fransisco Nieto (2); M. Wit (4, 17, 23, 37); TBI archive (24, 27, 83); W. Heerding (18); R. Zagt (12, 28, 84); FAO-mediabase, Jim Ball (38); B. van Gemerden (72). Printed by: Digigrafi, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Tropenbos International PO Box 232 6700 AE Wageningen, the Netherlands t: +31.(0)317.481416 e: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Life History Strategies: the Role of Defenses
    For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only. Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Virginia Tech Univ Lib on 06/06/17 For personal use only.
    [Show full text]