DOCSLIB.ORG

63Dd25a4-3Fd7-4A6b-8709

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
63Dd25a4-3Fd7-4A6b-8709 THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE PENAL CODE (CHAPTER 224) (Original Enactment: Ordinance 4 of 1871) REVISED EDITION 2008 (30th November 2008) Prepared and Published by THE LAW REVISION COMMISSION UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS ACT (CHAPTER 275) Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 CHAPTER 224 2008 Ed. Penal Code ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Chapter I — Preliminary Section 1. Short title 2. Punishment of offences committed within Singapore 3. Punishment of offences committed beyond, but which by law may be tried within Singapore 4. Jurisdiction over public servants for offences committed outside Singapore 4A. Offences against State and genocide committed outside Singapore by citizen or permanent resident 4B. Punishment of specified offences with elements occurring in Singapore but others occurring outside Singapore 5. Certain laws not to be affected by this Code Chapter II — General Explanations 6. Definitions in this Code to be understood subject to exceptions 6A. Definitions to apply to this Code and other written law 7. Expression once explained is used in the same sense throughout this Code 8. “Gender” 9. “Number” 10. “Man” and “woman” 11. “Person” 12. “Public” 17. “Government” 19. “Judge” 20. “Court of justice” 21. “Public servant” 22. “Property” 22A. “Fault element” and “physical element” 23. “Wrongful gain” and “wrongful loss” 24. “Dishonestly” 25. “Fraudulently” 1 Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 2008 Ed. Penal Code CAP. 224 2 Section 26. “Reason to believe” 26A. “Voluntarily” 26B. “Good faith” 26C. “Intentionally” 26D. “Knowingly” 26E. “Rashly” 26F. “Negligently” 26G. “Transferred fault” 26H. “Strict liability” 27. Property in possession of spouse, clerk or servant 28. “Counterfeit” 29. “Document” 29A. “Writing” 29B. “Electronic record” 30. “Valuable security” 31. “A will” 31A. “Die” and “instrument” 32. Words referring to acts include illegal omissions 33. “Act” and “omission” 34. Each of several persons liable for an act done by all, in like manner as if done by him alone 35. When such an act is criminal by reason of its being done with a criminal knowledge or intention 36. Effect caused partly by act and partly by omission 37. Co-operation by doing one of several acts constituting an offence 38. Several persons engaged in the commission of a criminal act may be guilty of different offences 39. [Repealed] 40. “Offence” 41. Offence with specified term of imprisonment 42. “Obscene” 43. “Illegal”, “unlawful” and “legally bound to do” 44. “Injury” 44A. “Bodily injury” 45. “Life” 46. “Death” 47. “Animal” 48. “Vessel” 49. “Year” and “month” Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 3 CAP. 224 Penal Code 2008 Ed. Section 50. “Section” 51. “Oath” 52. [Repealed] Chapter III — Punishments 53. Punishments 54. Imprisonment for life 57. [Repealed] 71. [Repealed] 72. Punishment of a person found guilty of one of several offences, the judgment stating that it is doubtful of which 73. Enhanced penalties for offences against domestic workers 74. Enhanced penalties for racially or religiously aggravated offences 74A. Enhanced penalties for offences against vulnerable persons 74B. Enhanced penalties for offences against person below 14 years of age 74C. Enhanced penalties for offences against victims in intimate relationships 74D. Enhanced penalties for offences against victims in close relationships 74E. Application of enhanced penalties 75. [Repealed] Chapter IV — General Exceptions 76. Act done by person bound, or justified by law 77. Act of judge when acting judicially 78. Act done pursuant to the judgment or order of a court of justice 79. Act done by person by mistake of fact believing himself bound or justified by law 79A. Mistake of law or ignorance of law not defence 80. Accident in the doing of a lawful act 81. Act likely to cause harm but done to prevent other harm 82. Act of a child under 10 years of age 83. Act of a child of or above 10 and below 12 years of age, who has not sufficient maturity of understanding 84. Act of person of unsound mind 85. Intoxication when a defence 86. Effect of defence of intoxication when established Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 2008 Ed. Penal Code CAP. 224 4 Section 87. Act not intended and not known to be likely to cause death or grievous hurt, done by consent 88. Act not intended to cause death done by consent in good faith for the benefit of a person 89. Act done in good faith for the benefit of a child or person of unsound mind, by or by consent of guardian 90. Consent given under fear or misconception, by person of unsound mind, etc., and by child 91. Acts which are offences independently of harm caused to the person consenting, are not within the exceptions in sections 87, 88 and 89 92. Act done in good faith for the benefit of a person without consent 93. Communication made in good faith 94. Act to which a person is compelled by threats 95. Act causing slight harm Chapter IVA — Right of private defence General 96. Nothing done in private defence is an offence 97. Right of private defence of the body and of property 98. Extent to which right may be exercised 99. Right of private defence against act of person of unsound mind, etc. 100. Right of private defence against deadly assault when there is risk of harm to innocent person Right of private defence of body 101. Start and continuance of right of private defence of body 102. When right of private defence of body extends to causing death 103. When such right extends to causing any harm other than death Right of private defence of property 104. Commencement and continuance of right of private defence of property 105. When right of private defence of property extends to causing death 106. When such right extends to causing any harm other than death Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 5 CAP. 224 Penal Code 2008 Ed. No right of private defence Section 106A. Acts against which there is no right of private defence Chapter V — Abetment 107. Abetment of the doing of a thing 108. Abettor 108A. Abetment in Singapore of an offence outside Singapore 108B. Abetment outside Singapore of an offence in Singapore 109. Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment 110. Punishment of abetment if the person abetted does the act with a different intention from that of the abettor 111. Liability of abettor when one act is abetted and a different act is done 112. Abettor, when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done 113. Liability of abettor for an offence caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor 114. Abettor present when offence committed 115. Abetment of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life 116. Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment 117. Abetting the commission of an offence by the public or by more than 10 persons 118. Concealing a design to commit an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life 119. A public servant concealing a design to commit an offence which it is his duty to prevent 120. Concealing a design to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment Chapter VA — Criminal Conspiracy 120A. Definition of criminal conspiracy 120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy Chapter VI — Offences against the State 121. Waging or attempting to wage war or abetting the waging of war against the Government Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 2008 Ed. Penal Code CAP. 224 6 Section 121A. Offences against the President’s person 121B. Offences against authority 121C. Abetting offences under section 121A or 121B 121D. Intentional omission to give information of offences against section 121, 121A, 121B or 121C by a person bound to inform 122. Collecting arms, etc., with the intention of waging war against the Government 123. Concealing with intent to facilitate a design to wage war 124. Assaulting President, etc., with intent to compel or restrain the exercise of any lawful power 125. Waging war against any power in alliance or at peace with Singapore 126. Committing depredation on the territories of any power in alliance or at peace with Singapore 127. Receiving property taken by war or depredation mentioned in sections 125 and 126 128. Public servant voluntarily allowing prisoner of State or war in his custody to escape 129. Public servant negligently suffering prisoner of State or war in his custody to escape 130. Aiding escape of, rescuing, or harbouring such prisoner 130A. “Harbour” Chapter VIA — Piracy 130B. Piracy by law of nations. Cf. 12 and 13 Victoria c. 96 (Admiralty Offences (Colonial) Act 1849) 130C. Piratical acts Chapter VIB — Genocide 130D. Genocide 130E. Punishment for genocide Chapter VII — Offences relating to the armed forces 131. Abetting mutiny, or attempting to seduce an officer or a serviceman from his duty 132. Abetment of mutiny, if mutiny is committed in consequence thereof 133. Abetment of an assault by an officer or a serviceman on his superior officer, when in the execution of his office 134. Abetment of such assault, if the assault is committed Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 7 CAP. 224 Penal Code 2008 Ed. Section 135. Abetment of the desertion of an officer or a serviceman 136. Harbouring a deserter 137. Deserter concealed on board merchant vessel through negligence of master 138. Abetment of act of insubordination by an officer or a serviceman 139. Saving 140. Wearing the dress of a serviceman 140A. “Harbour” 140B. Application of Chapter VII to Singapore Police Force Chapter VIII — Offences relating to unlawful assembly 141.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 146435NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. • BASIC COURSE INSTRUCTOR· UNIT GUIDE c 7 ) ~___________ C_R_IM_E_S __ A_G_A_IN_S_T_P_E_R_S_O_N_S ___________) (November 1~ l L1 6435 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of JU!~tice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been grantedcaliforTIla by. Camm1SS10n•• on p eace - Offlcer StandardS ana: Tf'alning to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner . • ---~------;----------.----~ - ------ - ------ • The curricula contained in this document is designed as a guideline for the delivery of performance-based law enforcement training. It is part of the POST Basic Course guidelines system developed by California law enforcement trainers and criminal justice educators in cooperation with the California • Commission on Peace Officer Sandards and Training . • ,, ,. II UNIT GUIDE 7 :: • TABLE OF CONTENTS LEARNING DOMAIN 7 Crimes Against Persons Page Knowledge Test 7 (POSTRAC) 3.10.1 Extortion ...................................... 1 3.17." Assault 3 3.17.2 Battery 5 3.18.1 Assault \I\Iith a Deadly Weapon .. 7 3.19.1 Mayhem ....................................... 9 3.20.1 Inflicting Corporal Injury Upon a Spouse, etc. ............ 11 3.23.6 Terrorism (Hate Crime) ............................ 13 3.25.1 Robbery ....................................... 17 • 3.26.1 Kidnapping or False Imprisonment .................... 21 3.27.1 Aiding or Encouraging a Suicide .
    [Show full text]
  • World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems
    WORLD FACTBOOK OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS SINGAPORE Mahesh Nalla Michigan State University This country report is one of many prepared for the World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems under Bureau of Justice Statistics grant No. 90-BJ-CX-0002 to the State University of New York at Albany. The project director was Graeme R. Newman, but responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in each report is that of the individual author. The contents of these reports do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Bureau of Justice Statistics or the U. S. Department of Justice. GENERAL OVERVIEW I. Political system. Singapore is a city/nation with a population of 2.6 million. 77% of its population are Chinese, 15%, Malays, and 6%, Indian. The four official languages of Singapore are English, Mandarin Chinese, Malay, and Tamil. (Vreeland, et.al., 1977). The Republic of Singapore is a parliamentary government patterned after the English Westminster model. The constitution provides the structure and organization of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the government. (Vreeland, et.al., 1977). 2. Legal system The legal system in Singapore is adversarial in nature. English common law was superimposed on the existing Malay customary law and Muslim law. Consequently, the legal system in Singapore can be characterized as pluralistic. While the dominant common law which shaped the Singapore legal system applies to all segments of the population, Muslim law governs the Muslim community in religious and matrimonial matters. Muslim law is administered in accordance with the Administration of Muslim Law Act, Cap.42.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore-Women's Charter.Pdf
    Singapore Women’s Charter, Chapter 353 PART I PRELIMINARY Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Women’s Charter. Interpretation 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires — "brothel" means any place occupied or used by any 2 or more women or girls whether at the same time or at different times for the purpose of prostitution; "club" means any place which is used by an association of 2 or more persons for any purpose or object; "Conciliation Officer" means a Conciliation Officer appointed under section 48; "Deputy Registrar" means a Deputy Registrar of Marriages appointed under section 26; "Director" means the Director of Social Welfare appointed under section 2A (1) of the Children and Young Persons Act (Cap. 38) and includes any person who is authorised by him to perform any of the duties or exercise any of the powers of the Director under this Act or any rules made thereunder; "married woman" means a woman validly married under any law, religion, custom or usage; "minor" means a person who is below the age of 21 years and who is not married or a widower or widow; "occupier" of a place means the tenant, sub-tenant or lessee thereof or any person in charge of the place whether or not he is in actual occupation and whether he has or has not powers to let or sub-let; "owner" of a place means a person who, for the time being, has power or authority to let, hire, sell or convey the place to another person, or who receives the rent of the place whether on his own account or as an agent or trustee for any other person; "place"
    [Show full text]
  • JUDICIAL EDUCATION and TRAINING Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training
    and Training Issue 4 2015 JUDICIAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training MISSION The journal Judicial Education and Training publishes topical articles on the education and training of judges and justice sector professionals around the world. This journal aims to stimulate a community of learning in judicial education by showcasing selected papers presented to the biennial conferences of the International Organization for Judicial Training (IOJT). Additionally, it solicits original research, practical experience, and critical analysis on issues and trends in judicial education. It also provides a medium for informed discussion, the exchange of professional experience, and the development of knowledge in judicial education for a global readership. Contributions are invited from chief justices and senior judges, judicial educators and academic researchers with an interest in this field. Earlier issues of this online journal may be found at: http://www.iojt.org/journal/page~journal.html. JUDICIAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training 2015 JUDICIAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training Editor-in-Chief Prof. Amnon Carmi Editor Dr. Livingston Armytage Associate Editors Amy McDowell, Charles Campbell Editorial Board Judge Nikolay Angelov, Bulgaria; Dr. Livingston Armytage, Australia; Prof. Amnon Carmi, Israel; Judge (Ret.) Tony Cotter, USA; Judge Stephanie Domitrovich, USA; Judge Ives Gandra, Brazil;
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13, Crimes Against Property
    Chapter 13 CHAPTER 13: CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY INTRODUCTION Crimes against property can take many forms and have many different names. Texas prefers “theft” over the older term ‘larceny,’ has a consolidate theft statute, and a whole chapter dealing with computer crimes. Like all states, Texas has statutes dealing with robbery and forgery. Theft, embezzlement, and related statutes are found in Texas Penal Code (TPC) ch. 31, “Theft:” http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/word/pe.007.00.000031.00.doc The robbery statutes are found in TPC ch. 29: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/word/pe.007.00.000029.00.doc TPC ch. 32 “Fraud” contains forgery, credit card abuse and related statutes: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/word/pe.007.00.000032.00.doc “Computer Crimes” are found in ch. 33 of the TPC: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/word/pe.007.00.000033.00.doc THEFT Like many states, Texas has a consolidated theft statute: Sec. 31.02 provides: CONSOLIDATION OF THEFT OFFENSES. Theft as defined in Section 31.03 constitutes a single offense superseding the separate offenses previously known as theft, theft by false pretext, conversion by a bailee, theft from the person, shoplifting, acquisition of property by threat, swindling, swindling by worthless check, embezzlement, extortion, receiving or concealing embezzled property, and receiving or concealing stolen property. The consolidated theft statute (sec. 31.03) is a long, complex and difficult statute. There are three basic ways to commit theft: (b) (1), (2) and (3).
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Study on Violence Against Children Response To
    United Nations Study on Violence against Children Response to questionnaire received from the Government of the Republic of SINGAPORE 1 UNITED NATIONS SECRETARY-GENERAL’S STUDY ON VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN QUESTIONNAIRE TO GOVERNMENTS 1. Describe any developments with respect to violence against children which have resulted from your country’s acceptance of international human rights instruments including, for example, the Convention on the Rights of the Child and its optional protocols, the Parlemo Protocol or regional human rights instruments. Provide information on cases concerning violence against children in which your country’s courts or tribunals have referred to international or regional human rights standards. Answer 1.1 The civil rights and freedom of children, which includes the protection of children in Singapore, is provided for in the Singapore Constitution and other legislative instruments such as the Children and Young Person’s Act and the Women’s Charter and the Penal Code. 1.2 Singapore’s laws and practices reflect the principle of ensuring the best interests of the child. They are also consistent with Singapore’s commitment and obligations under international conventions that we are party to. 1.3 In 1995, following Singapore’s accession to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, an Inter-Ministry Committee was convened to coordinate policies and programmes concerning children, including but not limited to the area of violence against children. The committee comprises representatives from various government agencies that deals with policies that affect children, including the Ministry of Law, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Community Development and Sports (MCDS), Ministry of Manpower, Ministry of Information, Communication and the Arts, Ministry of National Development, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defence as well as the Attorney-General’s Chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • Penal Code (Amendment) Act Passed by Parliament
    Client Update January 2008 Dispute Resolution Highlights Penal Code (Amendment) Act Passed By Relevance Of This Update .................................................... 1 Parliament Introduction Relevance Of This Update .................................................... 1 The Penal Code (Amendment) Act expands and modifies existing offences, Offences as well as introduces new offences, such as sexual acts committed against .................................................... 1 persons with mental disability and sexual grooming of minors. Modifications of existing offences include giving extra-territorial effect to the offence of Definitions, Explanations And engaging commercial sex with a person under 18, and making the Expressions................................. 6 deliberate wounding of religious and racial feelings of any person an offence. In addition, the penalties were also modified to provide the courts Penalties with greater sentencing discretion to reflect developments in crime trends. .................................................... 7 Consequential Amendments To Introduction Relevant Legislation .................................................... 7 The Penal Code (Amendment) Act (the ‘Act’) was passed by Parliament on 23 October 2007, amending the Singapore Penal Code (the ‘Code’) and Concluding Words certain other written laws. The Act will come into operation on 1 February .................................................... 7 2008. The key features of the Act are discussed below. Offences The Act expands and modifies
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Essential Information for the Self-Represented Accused
    CHAPTER 2 ESSENTIAL INFORMATION FOR THE SELF-REPRESENTED ACCUSED Guidebook For Accused In Person [11] A Guide To Representing Yourself In Court CHAPTER 2 ESSENTIAL INFORMATION FOR THE SELF-REPRESENTED ACCUSED (A) Should I hire a lawyer? Whether or not you wish to hire a lawyer is a personal decision. However, it is an important decision that should be made only after you have considered the pros and cons of the options available to you. Broadly speaking, when you are representing yourself, you would have to familiarise yourself with (i) the legal procedure and (ii) the substantive law (i.e. the laws and legal principles). This Guide will provide you with the necessary information on the legal procedure. However, it will not provide any insight on the substantive law and in particular, the defences available to you in law. If you intend to represent yourself, it is crucial that you know what your defences in law are. Even though you are representing yourself as a layman, the court cannot relax its procedural rules and standards for you. This means that you must be prepared to present your case as if you are a legally represented litigant. You must also be prepared to bear the full responsibility of preparing for and conducting your own case. The Judge may offer some guidance regarding the procedures of the trial but the Judge cannot act as your lawyer, i.e. the Judge cannot advise you on what you should do to successfully represent yourself. The role of the Judge is to ensure that you have a fair trial.
    [Show full text]
  • PENAL CODE (Act No.45 of 1907)
    この刑法の翻訳は、平成十八年法律第三六号までの改正（平成１８年５月２８日施行） について、」 「法令用語日英標準対訳辞書 （平成１８年３月版）に準拠して作成したもので す。 なお、この法令の翻訳は公定訳ではありません。法的効力を有するのは日本語の法令自 体であり、翻訳はあくまでその理解を助けるための参考資料です。この翻訳の利用に伴っ て発生した問題について、一切の責任を負いかねますので、法律上の問題に関しては、官 報に掲載された日本語の法令を参照してください。 This English translation of the Penal Code has been prepared (up to the revisions of Act No. 36 of 2006(Effective May 28, 2006)) in compliance with the Standard Bilingual Dictionary (March 2006 edition). This is an unofficial translation. Only the original Japanese texts of laws and regulations have legal effect, and the translations are to be used solely as reference material to aid in the understanding of Japanese laws and regulations. The Government of Japan shall not be responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the legislative material provided in this Website, or for any consequence resulting from use of the information in this Website. For all purposes of interpreting and applying law to any legal issue or dispute, users should consult the original Japanese texts published in the Official Gazette. PENAL CODE (Act No.45 of 1907) PART I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter I. Scope of Application Article 1. (Crimes Committed within Japan) (1) This Code shall apply to anyone who commits a crime within the territory of Japan. (2) The same shall apply to anyone who commits a crime on board a Japanese vessel or aircraft outside the territory of Japan. Article 2. (Crimes Committed outside Japan) This Code shall apply to anyone who commits one of the following crimes outside the territory of Japan: (i)
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore 2020 Human Rights Report
    SINGAPORE 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Singapore is a parliamentary republic where the People’s Action Party, in power since 1959, dominates the political scene. The Elections Department declared Halimah Yacob president in 2017; she was the only candidate who qualified for the ballot, which was reserved that year for an ethnic Malay. Observers considered the general election held in July to be free and open; the People’s Action Party won 83 of 93 parliamentary seats with 61 percent of the vote. The president subsequently reappointed party leader Lee Hsien Loong as prime minister. The Singapore Police Force, under the direction of the Ministry of Home Affairs, maintains internal security. The Singapore Armed Forces, under the Ministry of Defense, have trained for deployment alongside the Home Affairs Ministry for certain domestic security operations, including joint deterrence patrols with police in instances of heightened terrorism alerts. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Members of the security forces did not commit abuses. Significant human rights issues included: preventive detention by the government under various laws that dispense with regular judicial due process; monitoring private electronic or telephone conversations without a warrant; serious restrictions on the press and internet, including criminal libel laws; substantial legal and regulatory limitations on the rights of peaceful assembly and freedom of association; and existence of a law criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between men, although not enforced. The government prosecuted officials who committed human rights abuses. There were no reports of impunity for such abuses as of November. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Jurisdiction Over Operation of a Pirate Ship: the Legality of the Evolving Piracy Definition in Regional Prosecutions Samuel Shnider
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND COMMERCIAL REGULATION Volume 38 | Number 2 Article 3 Winter 2013 Universal Jurisdiction over Operation of a Pirate Ship: The Legality of the Evolving Piracy Definition in Regional Prosecutions Samuel Shnider Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Samuel Shnider, Universal Jurisdiction over Operation of a Pirate Ship: The Legality of the Evolving Piracy Definition in Regional Prosecutions, 38 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 473 (2012). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol38/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Universal Jurisdiction over Operation of a Pirate Ship: The Legality of the Evolving Piracy Definition in Regional Prosecutions Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This article is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ ncilj/vol38/iss2/3 Universal Jurisdiction Over "Operation of a Pirate Ship": The Legality of the Evolving Piracy Definition in Regional Prosecutions By Samuel Shniderf I. Introduction: "Operation of a Pirate Ship" and the Proposal of "Equipment Articles" for the Successful Prosecution of Somali Pirates............... ..... 474 II. Universal Jurisdiction Over Piracy and its Limits.............482 A. The Universal Condemnation of the Crime of Piracy . ............................ ..... 485 B. Other Explanations For Universal Jurisdiction Over Piracy ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Penal Code Penal Code
    PENAL CODE PENAL CODE With the participation of John Rason SPENCER QC Professor of Law, University of Cambridge Fellow of Selwyn College FIRST PART ENACTED PARTS Articles 111-1 to 727-2 BOOK I GENERAL PROVISIONS Articles 111-1 to 133-1 TITLE I THE CRIMINAL LAW Articles 111-1 to 113-1 CHAPTER I GENERAL PRINCIPLES Articles 111-1 to 111-5 ARTICLE 111-1 Criminal offences are categorised as according to their seriousness as felonies, misdemeanours or petty offences. ARTICLE 111-2 Statute defines felonies and misdemeanours and determines the penalties applicable to their perpetrators. Regulations define petty offences and determine the penalties applicable to those who commit them, within the limits and according to the distinctions established by law. ARTICLE 111-3 No one may be punished for a felony or for a misdemeanour whose ingredients are not defined by statute, nor for a petty offence whose ingredients are not defined by a regulation. No one may be punished by a penalty which is not provided for by the statute, if the offence is a felony or a misdemeanour, or by a regulation, if the offence is a petty offence. ARTICLE 111-4 Criminal legislation is to be construed strictly. ARTICLE 111-5 Criminal courts have jurisdiction to interpret administrative decisions of a regulatory or individual nature, and to appreciate their legality where the solution to the criminal case they are handling depends upon such examination. CHAPTER II OF THE OPERATIVE PERIOD OF A CRIMINAL LAW Articles 112-1 to 112-4 ARTICLE 112-1 Conduct is punishable only where it constituted a criminal offence at the time when it took place.
    [Show full text]