DOCSLIB.ORG

MAP PROJECTION DESIGN Alan Vonderohe (January 2020) Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MAP PROJECTION DESIGN Alan Vonderohe (January 2020) Background MAP PROJECTION DESIGN Alan Vonderohe (January 2020) Background For millennia cartographers, geodesists, and surveyors have sought and developed means for representing Earth’s surface on two-dimensional planes. These means are referred to as “map projections”. With modern BIM, CAD, and GIS technologies headed toward three- and four-dimensional representations, the need for two-dimensional depictions might seem to be diminishing. However, map projections are now used as horizontal rectangular coordinate reference systems for innumerable global, continental, national, regional, and local applications of human endeavor. With upcoming (2022) reference frame and coordinate system changes, interest in design of map projections (especially, low-distortion projections (LDPs)) has seen a reemergence. Earth’s surface being irregular and far from mathematically continuous, the first challenge has been to find an appropriate smooth surface to represent it. For hundreds of years, the best smooth surface was assumed to be a sphere. As the science of geodesy began to emerge and measurement technology advanced, it became clear that Earth is flattened at the poles and was, therefore, better represented by an oblate spheroid or ellipsoid of revolution about its minor axis. Since development of NAD 83, and into the foreseeable future, the ellipsoid used in the United States is referred to as “GRS 80”, with semi-major axis a = 6378137 m (exactly) and semi-minor axis b = 6356752.314140347 m (derived). Specifying a reference ellipsoid does not solve the problem of mathematically representing things on a two-dimensional plane. This is because an ellipsoid is not a “developable” surface. That is, no part of an ellipsoid can be laid flat without tearing or warping it. There are a number of developable surfaces. The most frequently used are cones and cylinders. A cone can be cut from its base to its apex and laid flat. Similarly, a cylinder can be cut parallel with its axis, unrolled, and laid flat. Two-dimensional rectangular coordinate axes (e.g., northing and easting, X and Y) can then be established on these surfaces. See Figure 1. 1 1. Map projection surfaces can be secant to the reference ellipsoid, intersecting it along two lines, as shown in Figure 1. They can be tangent to it, intersecting it along a single line, or they can be non-intersecting with it. There are functional relationships between points having geodetic coordinates (latitude and longitude) on the reference ellipsoid and corresponding points with two-dimensional rectangular coordinates on a map projection surface. A map projection can be described by mathematical transformations between these two types of coordinates. A “direct” transformation computes northing and easting (N,E) from latitude and longitude (ϕ,λ): N = f1(ϕ,λ, ellipsoid parameters, map projection parameters) E = f2(ϕ,λ, ellipsoid parameters, map projection parameters) 1 An “inverse” transformation computes ϕ,λ from N,E: ϕ = g1(N,E, ellipsoid parameters, map projection parameters) λ = g2(N,E, ellipsoid parameters, map projection parameters) 2 In the equations above, ellipsoid parameters are two descriptors that define the size and shape of the reference ellipsoid (e.g., a and b). Map projection 2 parameters are descriptors that define the size and shape of the map projection surface and its location and orientation with respect to the reference ellipsoid. Map projection parameters also define the location of the rectangular coordinate origin and its false northing and false easting values. Because map projection surfaces do not coincide with the reference ellipsoid, except at lines of intersection or tangency, features projected from the ellipsoid to the map projection will be distorted. The first step in map projection design is selection of the type of map projection based upon what spatial aspects are least distorted. The appropriate choice depends upon applications to be supported and user desires. Some projections tend to preserve areas and are referred to as “equal-area”. On such projections, areas of equal size on Earth’s surface appear as areas of equal size on the map projection. “Equidistant” projections show no scale variation between one or two points and every other point on the map, or along every meridian. “Azimuthal” projections are such that the azimuths to all points on the map are shown correctly with respect to its center (Snyder (1987)). Some projections tend to preserve shape, that is, local angles are the same on Earth’s surface as they are on the map projection surface. At any particular point on such a projection, scale is constant and independent of direction, although scale will vary from point to point. These projections are referred to as “conformal” and are the type of projection suitable for a host of applications in geodesy, surveying, and mapping. The conic and cylindrical projections shown in Figure 1 are referred to as “Lambert conformal conic” and “transverse Mercator”, respectively. On these projections, each point has a scale factor (k) such that k = h1(ϕ,λ, ellipsoid parameters, map projection parameters) 3 where k is a positive real number expressing the ratio of an infinitesimal distance on the map projection surface to the corresponding infinitesimal distance on the reference ellipsoid. If k < 1, then the map projection surface is interior to the reference ellipsoid at ϕ,λ. If k > 1, then the map projection surface is exterior to the reference ellipsoid at ϕ,λ. If k = 1, then the map projection surface and the reference ellipsoid intersect at ϕ,λ. See Figure 2. 3 k > 1 k = 1 k < 1 k = 1 k > 1 Figure 2. A Secant Map Projection Surface Indicating Scale Factors Non-zero scale distortion, arising from k ǂ 1, is expressed as either a ratio of 1 : XXXXXX where XXXXXX = | int [ 1 / (k – 1) ] | 4 or in integer parts per million (ppm), calculated as int [ round { (k – 1) * 106, 0 } ]. In the former case, XXXXXX is always positive. In the latter case, the parts per million expression can be positive or negative. In any case, if k = 1, scale distortion equals zero. The primary criterion for map projection design is often a specified maximum absolute value for tolerable distortion. For conformal projections, scale distortion is the controlling variable, with the tolerance specified as in equation 4 or as a range such as ±100 ppm. On Lambert conformal conic projections, scale factors vary most dramatically in the north-south direction. Therefore, they are well-suited for areas whose east- west extents are greater than their north-south extents. Conversely, on transverse Mercator projections, scale factors vary most dramatically in the east- 4 west direction, making them well-suited for areas whose north-south extents are greater than their east-west extents. After choosing the appropriate type of map projection for the applications to be supported, the next step in design involves either: 1. Specifying map projection parameters that meet the design criteria, then finding the geographic extents of the area to be covered; or 2. Specifying geographic extents of the area to be covered, then finding map projection parameters for optimal distribution of distortion. The first method was used by the US Coast and Geodetic Survey (USC&GS) for design of the State Plane Coordinate System of 1927 (SPCS 27). The second method was used for design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System (WCCS). Map Projection Parameters Parameters for Lambert conformal conic map projections depend upon whether the projection surface is secant to or non-intersecting with the reference ellipsoid. If secant to, the parameters are: 1. ϕN = Latitude of the northern standard parallel. 2. ϕS = Latitude of the southern standard parallel. 3. ϕb = Latitude of the coordinate origin. 4. λo = Longitude of the central meridian and the coordinate origin. 5. Nb = False northing of the coordinate origin. 6. Eo = False easting of the coordinate origin. where the standard parallels are lines of constant latitude at the intersections of the cone and the reference ellipsoid, as in Figure 1; the latitude of the coordinate origin and the longitude of the central meridian are often chosen central to the geographic extents of the projection, and the false northing and false easting are chosen to make positive all northings and eastings within the geographic extents of the projection. If non-intersecting, the parameters for a Lambert conformal conic projection are: 1. ϕo = Latitude of the central parallel and the coordinate origin. 2. λo = Longitude of the central meridian and the coordinate origin. 5 3. ko = Scale factor along the central parallel. 4. No = False northing of the coordinate origin. 5. Eo = False easting of the coordinate origin. where the central parallel and the central meridian are often chosen central to the geographic extents of the projection, the scale factor on the central parallel is chosen to optimize scale factors across the geographic extents of the projection, and the false northing and false easting are chosen to make positive all northings and eastings within the geographic extents of the projection. If a Lambert conformal conic projection is tangent to the reference ellipsoid, the line of tangency is the central parallel and its scale factor is 1. Also, the central parallel and its scale factor can be computed from the parameters of a secant Lambert conformal conic projection. The parameters for a transverse Mercator projection, whether it is secant to, tangent to, or non-intersecting with the reference
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nicolas-Auguste Tissot: a Link Between Cartography and Quasiconformal Theory
    NICOLAS-AUGUSTE TISSOT: A LINK BETWEEN CARTOGRAPHY AND QUASICONFORMAL THEORY ATHANASE PAPADOPOULOS Abstract. Nicolas-Auguste Tissot (1824{1897) published a series of papers on cartography in which he introduced a tool which became known later on, among geographers, under the name of the Tissot indicatrix. This tool was broadly used during the twentieth century in the theory and in the practical aspects of the drawing of geographical maps. The Tissot indicatrix is a graph- ical representation of a field of ellipses on a map that describes its distortion. Tissot studied extensively, from a mathematical viewpoint, the distortion of mappings from the sphere onto the Euclidean plane that are used in drawing geographical maps, and more generally he developed a theory for the distor- sion of mappings between general surfaces. His ideas are at the heart of the work on quasiconformal mappings that was developed several decades after him by Gr¨otzsch, Lavrentieff, Ahlfors and Teichm¨uller.Gr¨otzsch mentions the work of Tissot and he uses the terminology related to his name (in particular, Gr¨otzsch uses the Tissot indicatrix). Teichm¨ullermentions the name of Tissot in a historical section in one of his fundamental papers where he claims that quasiconformal mappings were used by geographers, but without giving any hint about the nature of Tissot's work. The name of Tissot is also missing from all the historical surveys on quasiconformal mappings. In the present paper, we report on this work of Tissot. We shall also mention some related works on cartography, on the differential geometry of surfaces, and on the theory of quasiconformal mappings.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodetic Surveying, Earth Modeling, and the New Geodetic Datum of 2022
    Geodetic Surveying, Earth Modeling, and the New Geodetic Datum of 2022 PDH330 3 Hours PDH Academy PO Box 449 Pewaukee, WI 53072 (888) 564-9098 www.pdhacademy.com [email protected] Geodetic Surveying Final Exam 1. Who established the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey? A) Thomas Jefferson B) Benjamin Franklin C) George Washington D) Abraham Lincoln 2. Flattening is calculated from what? A) Equipotential surface B) Geoid C) Earth’s circumference D) The semi major and Semi minor axis 3. A Reference Frame is based off how many dimensions? A) two B) one C) four D) three 4. Who published “A Treatise on Fluxions”? A) Einstein B) MacLaurin C) Newton D) DaVinci 5. The interior angles of an equilateral planar triangle adds up to how many degrees? A) 360 B) 270 C) 180 D) 90 6. What group started xDeflec? A) NGS B) CGS C) DoD D) ITRF 7. When will NSRS adopt the new time-based system? A) 2022 B) 2020 C) Unknown due to delays D) 2021 8. Did the State Plane Coordinate System of 1927 have more zones than the State Plane Coordinate System of 1983? A) No B) Yes C) They had the same D) The State Plane Coordinate System of 1927 did not have zones 9. A new element to the State Plane Coordinate System of 2022 is: A) The addition of Low Distortion Projections B) Adjoining tectonic plates C) Airborne gravity collection D) None of the above 10. The model GRAV-D (Gravity for Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum) created will replace _____________ and constitute the new vertical height system of the United States A) Decimal degrees B) Minutes C) NAVD 88 D) All of the above Introduction to Geodetic Surveying The early curiosity of man has driven itself to learn more about the vastness of our planet and the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Map Projections
    Understanding Map Projections GIS by ESRI ™ Melita Kennedy and Steve Kopp Copyright © 19942000 Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. The information contained in this document is the exclusive property of Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. This work is protected under United States copyright law and other international copyright treaties and conventions. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, except as expressly permitted in writing by Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. All requests should be sent to Attention: Contracts Manager, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373-8100, USA. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. U.S. GOVERNMENT RESTRICTED/LIMITED RIGHTS Any software, documentation, and/or data delivered hereunder is subject to the terms of the License Agreement. In no event shall the U.S. Government acquire greater than RESTRICTED/LIMITED RIGHTS. At a minimum, use, duplication, or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in FAR §52.227-14 Alternates I, II, and III (JUN 1987); FAR §52.227-19 (JUN 1987) and/or FAR §12.211/12.212 (Commercial Technical Data/Computer Software); and DFARS §252.227-7015 (NOV 1995) (Technical Data) and/or DFARS §227.7202 (Computer Software), as applicable. Contractor/Manufacturer is Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373- 8100, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercator-15Dec2015.Pdf
    THE MERCATOR PROJECTIONS THE NORMAL AND TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTIONS ON THE SPHERE AND THE ELLIPSOID WITH FULL DERIVATIONS OF ALL FORMULAE PETER OSBORNE EDINBURGH 2013 This article describes the mathematics of the normal and transverse Mercator projections on the sphere and the ellipsoid with full deriva- tions of all formulae. The Transverse Mercator projection is the basis of many maps cov- ering individual countries, such as Australia and Great Britain, as well as the set of UTM projections covering the whole world (other than the polar regions). Such maps are invariably covered by a set of grid lines. It is important to appreciate the following two facts about the Transverse Mercator projection and the grids covering it: 1. Only one grid line runs true north–south. Thus in Britain only the grid line coincident with the central meridian at 2◦W is true: all other meridians deviate from grid lines. The UTM series is a set of 60 distinct Transverse Mercator projections each covering a width of 6◦in latitude: the grid lines run true north–south only on the central meridians at 3◦E, 9◦E, 15◦E, ... 2. The scale on the maps derived from Transverse Mercator pro- jections is not uniform: it is a function of position. For ex- ample the Landranger maps of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain have a nominal scale of 1:50000: this value is only ex- act on two slightly curved lines almost parallel to the central meridian at 2◦W and distant approximately 180km east and west of it. The scale on the central meridian is constant but it is slightly less than the nominal value.
    [Show full text]
  • An Efficient Technique for Creating a Continuum of Equal-Area Map Projections
    Cartography and Geographic Information Science ISSN: 1523-0406 (Print) 1545-0465 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tcag20 An efficient technique for creating a continuum of equal-area map projections Daniel “daan” Strebe To cite this article: Daniel “daan” Strebe (2017): An efficient technique for creating a continuum of equal-area map projections, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2017.1405285 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2017.1405285 View supplementary material Published online: 05 Dec 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tcag20 Download by: [4.14.242.133] Date: 05 December 2017, At: 13:13 CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2017.1405285 ARTICLE An efficient technique for creating a continuum of equal-area map projections Daniel “daan” Strebe Mapthematics LLC, Seattle, WA, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Equivalence (the equal-area property of a map projection) is important to some categories of Received 4 July 2017 maps. However, unlike for conformal projections, completely general techniques have not been Accepted 11 November developed for creating new, computationally reasonable equal-area projections. The literature 2017 describes many specific equal-area projections and a few equal-area projections that are more or KEYWORDS less configurable, but flexibility is still sparse. This work develops a tractable technique for Map projection; dynamic generating a continuum of equal-area projections between two chosen equal-area projections.
    [Show full text]
  • Noaa 2022 Nsrs Adjustment Part 3
    NOAA Technical Report NOS NGS 67 Blueprint for 2022, Part 3: Working in the Modernized NSRS Initial draft released April 25, 2019 1 Versions Date Changes April 25, 2019 Original Draft Release 2 Notes On the use of “TBD”: This document is an initial draft of policies and procedures the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) is refining as we prepare to define the modernized National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) in year 2022. The intent of releasing this document so many years in advance is so we may provide the NSRS user community with insight and as many details as are currently available, as well as to give time for these details to be read and understood and for feedback to be provided back to NGS. The early release of this document, therefore, naturally comes with certain unresolved decisions. Rather than delay the entire document, the term TBD (To Be Determined) has been used herein to indicate where a decision is pending. On the use of the terms “datums” and “reference frames”: Entire chapters of books could be dedicated to the distinction, or lack thereof, between the terms datums and reference frames, however for this paper we will define these terms in this way: In 2022 the NSRS will consist of four terrestrial reference frames and one geopotential datum. From time to time and for the sake of brevity, the four terrestrial reference frames and the one geopotential datum may be clustered under the general term “new datums.” For example, NGS has put information concerning the NSRS modernization on a “New Datums” web page.
    [Show full text]
  • National Spatial Reference System: "Positioning Changes for 2022"
    National Spatial Reference System “Positioning Changes for 2022” Civil GPS Service Interface Committee Meeting Miami, Florida September 24, 2018 Denis Riordan, PSM NOAA, National Geodetic Survey [email protected] U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration National Geodetic Survey Mission: To define, maintain & provide access to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) to meet our Nation’s economic, social & environmental needs National Spatial Reference System * Latitude * Scale * Longitude * Gravity * Height * Orientation & their variations in time U. S. Geometric Datums in 2022 National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) Improvements in the Horizontal Datums TIME NETWORK METHOD NETWORK SPAN ACCURACY OF REFERENCE NAD 27 1927-1986 10 meter (1 part in 100,000) TRAVERSE & TRIANGULATION - GROUND MARKS USED FOR NAD83(86) 1986-1990 1 meter REFERENCING (1 part THE in 100,000) NSRS. NAD83(199x)* 1990-2007 0.1 meter GPS B- orderBECOMES (1 part THE in MEANS 1 million) OF POSITIONING – STILL GRND MARKS. HARN A-order (1 part in 10 million) NAD83(2007) 2007 - 2011 0.01 meter 0.01 meter GPS – CORS STATIONS ARE MEANS (CORS) OF REFERENCE FOR THE NSRS. NAD83(2011) 2011 - 2022 0.01 meter 0.01 meter (CORS) NSRS Reference Basis Old Method - Ground Current Method - GNSS Stations Marks (Terrestrial) (CORS) Why Replace NAD83? • Datum based on best known information about the earth’s size and shape from the early 1980’s (45 years old), and the terrestrial survey data of the time. • NAD83 is NON-geocentric & hence inconsistent w/GNSS . • Necessary for agreement with future ubiquitous positioning of GNSS capability. Future Geometric (3-D) Reference Frame Blueprint for 2022: Part 1 – Geometric Datum • Replace NAD83 with new geometric reference frame – by 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Ts 144 031 V12.3.0 (2015-07)
    ETSI TS 1144 031 V12.3.0 (201515-07) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Digital cellular telecocommunications system (Phahase 2+); Locatcation Services (LCS); Mobile Station (MS) - SeServing Mobile Location Centntre (SMLC) Radio Resosource LCS Protocol (RRLP) (3GPP TS 44.0.031 version 12.3.0 Release 12) R GLOBAL SYSTTEM FOR MOBILE COMMUNUNICATIONS 3GPP TS 44.031 version 12.3.0 Release 12 1 ETSI TS 144 031 V12.3.0 (2015-07) Reference RTS/TSGG-0244031vc30 Keywords GSM ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88 Important notice The present document can be downloaded from: http://www.etsi.org/standards-search The present document may be made available in electronic versions and/or in print. The content of any electronic and/or print versions of the present document shall not be modified without the prior written authorization of ETSI. In case of any existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions and/or in print, the only prevailing document is the print of the Portable Document Format (PDF) version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: https://portal.etsi.org/People/CommiteeSupportStaff.aspx Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm except as authorized by written permission of ETSI.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Systems for Surveying and Mapping Lecture Notes
    Delft University of Technology Reference Systems for Surveying and Mapping Lecture notes Hans van der Marel ii The front cover shows the NAP (Amsterdam Ordnance Datum) ”datum point” at the Stopera, Amsterdam (picture M.M.Minderhoud, Wikipedia/Michiel1972). H. van der Marel Lecture notes on Reference Systems for Surveying and Mapping: CTB3310 Surveying and Mapping CTB3425 Monitoring and Stability of Dikes and Embankments CIE4606 Geodesy and Remote Sensing CIE4614 Land Surveying and Civil Infrastructure February 2020 Publisher: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Delft University of Technology P.O. Box 5048 Stevinweg 1 2628 CN Delft The Netherlands Copyright ©2014­2020 by H. van der Marel The content in these lecture notes, except for material credited to third parties, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attributions­NonCommercial­SharedAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY­NC­SA). Third party material is shared under its own license and attribution. The text has been type set using the MikTex 2.9 implementation of LATEX. Graphs and diagrams were produced, if not mentioned otherwise, with Matlab and Inkscape. Preface This reader on reference systems for surveying and mapping has been initially compiled for the course Surveying and Mapping (CTB3310) in the 3rd year of the BSc­program for Civil Engineering. The reader is aimed at students at the end of their BSc program or at the start of their MSc program, and is used in several courses at Delft University of Technology. With the advent of the Global Positioning System (GPS) technology in mobile (smart) phones and other navigational devices almost anyone, anywhere on Earth, and at any time, can determine a three–dimensional position accurate to a few meters.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodetic Position Computations
    GEODETIC POSITION COMPUTATIONS E. J. KRAKIWSKY D. B. THOMSON February 1974 TECHNICALLECTURE NOTES REPORT NO.NO. 21739 PREFACE In order to make our extensive series of lecture notes more readily available, we have scanned the old master copies and produced electronic versions in Portable Document Format. The quality of the images varies depending on the quality of the originals. The images have not been converted to searchable text. GEODETIC POSITION COMPUTATIONS E.J. Krakiwsky D.B. Thomson Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick P.O. Box 4400 Fredericton. N .B. Canada E3B5A3 February 197 4 Latest Reprinting December 1995 PREFACE The purpose of these notes is to give the theory and use of some methods of computing the geodetic positions of points on a reference ellipsoid and on the terrain. Justification for the first three sections o{ these lecture notes, which are concerned with the classical problem of "cCDputation of geodetic positions on the surface of an ellipsoid" is not easy to come by. It can onl.y be stated that the attempt has been to produce a self contained package , cont8.i.ning the complete development of same representative methods that exist in the literature. The last section is an introduction to three dimensional computation methods , and is offered as an alternative to the classical approach. Several problems, and their respective solutions, are presented. The approach t~en herein is to perform complete derivations, thus stqing awrq f'rcm the practice of giving a list of for11111lae to use in the solution of' a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • World Geodetic System 1984
    World Geodetic System 1984 Responsible Organization: National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Abbreviated Frame Name: WGS 84 Associated TRS: WGS 84 Coverage of Frame: Global Type of Frame: 3-Dimensional Last Version: WGS 84 (G1674) Reference Epoch: 2005.0 Brief Description: WGS 84 is an Earth-centered, Earth-fixed terrestrial reference system and geodetic datum. WGS 84 is based on a consistent set of constants and model parameters that describe the Earth's size, shape, and gravity and geomagnetic fields. WGS 84 is the standard U.S. Department of Defense definition of a global reference system for geospatial information and is the reference system for the Global Positioning System (GPS). It is compatible with the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS). Definition of Frame • Origin: Earth’s center of mass being defined for the whole Earth including oceans and atmosphere • Axes: o Z-Axis = The direction of the IERS Reference Pole (IRP). This direction corresponds to the direction of the BIH Conventional Terrestrial Pole (CTP) (epoch 1984.0) with an uncertainty of 0.005″ o X-Axis = Intersection of the IERS Reference Meridian (IRM) and the plane passing through the origin and normal to the Z-axis. The IRM is coincident with the BIH Zero Meridian (epoch 1984.0) with an uncertainty of 0.005″ o Y-Axis = Completes a right-handed, Earth-Centered Earth-Fixed (ECEF) orthogonal coordinate system • Scale: Its scale is that of the local Earth frame, in the meaning of a relativistic theory of gravitation. Aligns with ITRS • Orientation: Given by the Bureau International de l’Heure (BIH) orientation of 1984.0 • Time Evolution: Its time evolution in orientation will create no residual global rotation with regards to the crust Coordinate System: Cartesian Coordinates (X, Y, Z).
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Geodetic Survey Markers?
    Part I Introduction to Geodetic Survey Markers, and the NGS / USPS Recovery Program Stf/C Greg Shay, JN-ACN United States Power Squadrons / America’s Boating Club Sponsor: USPS Cooperative Charting Committee Revision 5 - 2020 Part I - Topics Outline 1. USPS Geodetic Marker Program 2. What are Geodetic Markers 3. Marker Recovery & Reporting Steps 4. Coast Survey, NGS, and NOAA 5. Geodetic Datums & Control Types 6. How did Markers get Placed 7. Surveying Methods Used 8. The National Spatial Reference System 9. CORS Modernization Program Do you enjoy - Finding lost treasure? - the excitement of the hunt? - performing a valuable public service? - participating in friendly competition? - or just doing a really fun off-water activity? If yes , then participation in the USPS Geodetic Marker Recovery Program may be just the thing for you! The USPS Triangle and Civic Service Activities USPS Cooperative Charting / Geodetic Programs The Cooperative Charting Program (Nautical) and the Geodetic Marker Recovery Program (Land Based) are administered by the USPS Cooperative Charting Committee. USPS Cooperative Charting / Geodetic Program An agreement first executed between USPS and NOAA in 1963 The USPS Geodetic Program is a separate program from Nautical and was/is not part of the former Cooperative Charting agreement with NOAA. What are Geodetic Survey Markers? Geodetic markers are highly accurate surveying reference points established on the surface of the earth by local, state, and national agencies – mainly by the National Geodetic Survey (NGS). NGS maintains a database of all markers meeting certain criteria. Common Synonyms Mark for “Survey Marker” Marker Marker Station Note: the words “Geodetic”, Benchmark* “Survey” or Station “Geodetic Survey” Station Mark may precede each synonym.
    [Show full text]