Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (2012) 98, 845—849
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE
provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector
Available online at
www.sciencedirect.com
CASE REPORT
Ewing-like adamantinoma
a,∗ a a b a
M.M. Hamdane , L. Charfi , M. Driss , H. Nouri , R. Sellami-Dhouib ,
a b a
K. Mrad ,M. Mestiri , K. Ben Romdhane
a
Histopathology Department, Salah Azaiez Institute, Bab Saâdoun, 1006 Tunis, Tunisia
b
Adult Orthopaedics Department, Mohamed-Kassab Orthopaedics Institute, Ksar Saïd, 2010 Mannouba, Tunisia
Accepted: 6 June 2012
KEYWORDS Summary The Ewing-like variation of adamantinoma is a rare entity, leading to challenge its
Adamantinoma; differential diagnosis, notably with Ewing’s sarcoma. We are reporting a case of a 20-year-old
Sarcoma; male who presented with swelling in the left leg that had progressed over a 2-year period. X-rays
Ewing; revealed a tumour in the tibia that was intracortical, osteolytic, multilocular and invaded the
Pathology; soft tissues. A surgical biopsy was performed. Histopathology examination showed a tumour
Immunohistochemistry growth with small round cells expressing CD99. A diagnosis of Ewing’s sarcoma was made.
Since the patient declined surgical treatment, chemotherapy was administered. Tw o years later,
the patient returned because the tumour had grown in size. A second biopsy was performed.
Microscopic evaluation showed a tumour growth with osteofibrous and epithelial components,
which expressed pankeratin and vimentin, but was negative for CD99. A diagnosis of Ewing-like
adamantinoma was made.
© 2012 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Introduction We are reporting here on a rare case of Ewing-like adamanti-
noma.
Adamantinoma is a rare bone tumour in young adults that
usually affects the diaphysis of the tibia. This is a low-grade, Observation
malignant tumour, which histologically appears as a biphasic
tumour with intermingled epithelial and osteofibrous com-
This is the case of a 20-year-old male who presented with
ponents. A differential diagnosis with other lesions (both
swelling on the anterior aspect of the left leg, which had
benign and malignant) can be challenging to make based
become more evident over a 2-year period. Clinical exam-
only the histopathology. The diagnosis is even more
ination revealed a soft, painless swollen area, 5 cm in
challenging when this growth looks like a round cell tumour.
diameter, on the anterior aspect of the left leg, without signs
of inflammation or satellite lymphadenopathy. Standard X-
rays showed an intracortical, osteolytic, multilocular lesion
∗
with peripheral sclerosis on the anterior tibia that extended
Corresponding author. 60, avenue Bahi-Ladgham, Ennasr 2, 2037
Ariana, Tunisia. Tel.: +216 52 26 75 77. forward into the soft tissues and had a vacuolar, ‘‘soap-
E-mail address: [email protected] (M.M. Hamdane). bubble’’ like appearance. MRI showed an aggressive tumour
1877-0568/$ – see front matter © 2012 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.06.015
846 M.M. Hamdane et al.
Figure 1 MRI: a: frontal reconstruction showing the surface
lesion without medullary canal involvement; b: T1 after gadolin-
ium injection: intracortical lesion invading the soft tissues and
increasing in intensity.
Figure 2 Swelling on the anterior aspect of the left leg.
starting from the anteromedial cortex of the tibia, invad-
ing most of the soft tissues, but not affecting the medullary
canal (Fig. 1).
A surgical biopsy was performed. Histopathology showed
a tumour growth with diffuse layers of small, round,
monomorphic cells, with little cytoplasm, a round nucleus
and thin chromatin. The stroma was fibrous and highly vas-
cularized. Immunohistochemistry showed that the tumour
cells were intensely and diffusely stained for CD99 and
vimentin, and to a lesser degree for S100 proteins. Based
on these morphological and immunohistochemical fea-
tures, a diagnosis of Ewing’s sarcoma was made. The
patient underwent four rounds of chemotherapy. Amputa-
tion of the leg was then proposed to the patient, who
refused.
Tw o years later, the patient returned because the tumour
had increased in size. Physical examination showed a swollen
area, 17 cm in diameter, on the anterior aspect of the left
leg that was soft and slightly painful (Fig. 2). Standard
X-rays showed intracortical osteolysis with cortex rupture
and extension to the soft tissues (Fig. 3). MRI showed a
large superficial lesion starting at the cortex with significant Figure 3 Standard X-rays of the leg: intracortical, osteolytic
involvement of the soft tissues, having cavities separated lesion invading the soft tissues. Note the polycystic nature giv-
by T1 and T2 hyposignal partitions. These cavities had ing a ‘‘soap-bubble’’ appearance in the images and an ‘‘apple
fluid-fluid levels suggestive of associated aneurysmal cysts core’’ appearance that is easily seen on the X-ray (b).
(Fig. 4).
Based on the lengthy progression and radiological appear-
ance of the lesion, the diagnosis of Ewing’s sarcoma was
disputed. A second surgical biopsy was performed. Micro- CD99. A diagnosis of Ewing-like adamantinoma was then
scopic evaluation showed a tumour growth organized in made.
layers and streaks, within abundant fibrous and collagenous No distant metastasis was found. The tumour was excised
stroma (Fig. 5). The tumour cells were basophilic, cohe- surgically as a whole block. Reconstruction was performed
sive, rounded, polygonal or fusiform. In some areas, clear with a translated ipsilateral vascularized fibula; an external
epithelial differentiation was noted. There was moder- fixator was used for stabilisation. The fixator was removed
ate atypism and many mitotic cells. Immunohistochemistry after 1 year and a walking boot was used for the next 6
showed that the tumour cells expressed both keratin months. Three years after the surgery, the patient was doing
and vimentin (Figs. 6 and 7) and were negative for well.
Ewing-like adamantinoma 847
Figure 5 Tumour growth, epithelial in nature, organized in
layers and streaks, within abundant fibrous and collagenous
×
stroma (HE, 100 ).
×
Figure 6 Tumour cells expressing keratin (IHC, 400 ).
Figure 4 MRI: frontal reconstruction without (a) and with
(b) gadolinium injection and axial slice (c): polycystic corti-
cal lesion with changes to the medullary canal signal. Note the
appearance of the fluid-fluid level (c).
Figure 7 Tumour cells expressing vimentin (IHC, 200 ×).
848 M.M. Hamdane et al.
Discussion different morphological appearance than that of the initial
tumour: there was a predominant epithelial component, the
round cells had disappeared and there was no CD99 expres-
Adamantinoma is a rare, low-grade, malignant tumour that
sion.
consists 0.4% of all primary bone tumours and affects the
Treatment approaches for Ewing-like adamantinoma
diaphysis of the tibia in 85 to 90% of cases [1]. It can occur
have not yet been standardized, given how rare this entity
at any age, but mostly affects young adults (average age
is. In our reported case, the treatment approach was similar
of 25 to 35 years), with men being affected slightly more
to treatment of a classic adamantinoma; a wide resection
often than women [1]. Clinically, adamantinoma presents as
of the tumour was performed.
swelling of the leg that has slowly increased in size over time
and may or may not be painful [1]. X-rays usually show an
osteolytic, intracortical lesion, often having multiple parti- Conclusion
tions giving it a ‘‘soap-bubble’’ like appearance; the lesion
is surrounded by peripheral sclerosis [1]. Histopathology is The Ewing-like form of adamantinoma is a rare vari-
required for a positive diagnosis. Adamantinoma is char- ant. The aetiology of this pathology is not yet known.
acterized histologically by a biphasic growth with various The histopathology diagnosis is difficult. However, when a
amounts of intermingled epithelial and osteofibrous compo- tumour appears in the tibia of a young adult and has an
nents. In classic adamantinoma, the epithelial component intracortical location, a diagnosis of adamantinoma must
has four potential morphological variations: basaloid, tubu- be considered and further immunohistochemistry work must
lar, squamoid and spindle cell. A fifth histological subtype be done to look for expression of epithelial markers. In
can be distinguished from classic adamantinoma and is char- the most challenging cases, molecular biology studies can
acterised by a large amount of osteofibrous tissue. now be done on deparaffinised tissues, which would help
The Ewing-like form is a rare variant of adamantinoma, to differentiate between adamantinoma and Ewing’s sar-
with only five cases described in the published literature coma.
[2—5]. It is characterised by a growth of small, round,
uniform cells that express both epithelial and neural cell
Disclosure of interest
immunohistochemical markers, including those typical of
Ewing’s sarcoma (CD99+). These cells also have ultrastruc-
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest
tural characteristics of both epithelial and neuroendocrine
concerning this article.
cells [2,3,6,7].
The histogenesis of this tumour is not clear, but the
References
most likely hypothesis is that this adamantinoma variation
is issued from the same multipotent cell line that is at the
[1] Hogendoorn PCW, Hashimoto H. Adamantinoma. In: Fletcher
source of Ewing’s sarcoma. In fact, the latter is known to
CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organi-
have the ability to differentiate into either mesenchymal,
zation classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of
epithelial or neural cell lines [8—10]. This would explain the
tumours of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002. p.
double phenotype (epithelial and neuro-ectodermal) of this 332—4.
tumour.
[2] Lipper S, Kahn LB. Case report 235. Ewing-like adamantinoma
As would be expected from its name, Ewing-like of the left radial head and neck. Skeletal Radiol 1983;10:61—6.
adamantinoma results in diagnostic challenges relative to [3] Meister P, Konrad E, Hubner G. Malignant tumor of humerus
classic Ewing’s sarcoma. In our case, this led to a delayed with features of ‘‘adamantinoma’’ and Ewing’s sarcoma.
Pathol Res Pract 1979;166:112—22.
diagnosis and inadequate treatment. However, the patient’s
[4] Fukunaga M, Ushigome S. Periosteal Ewing-like adamantinoma.
age, tibial placement of the tumour and intracortical loca-
Virchows Arch 1998;433:385—9.
tion should guide the pathologist to look for the expression
[5] Ishida T, Iijima T, Kikuchi F, Kitagawa T, Tanida T, Ima-
of epithelial immunohistochemical markers.
mura T, et al. A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical
A differential diagnosis is even harder to make with
study of osteofibrous dysplasia, differentiated adamanti-
adamantinoma-like Ewing’s sarcoma. This is a rare type of
noma, and adamantinoma of long bones. Skeletal Radiol
Ewing’s sarcoma that, other than showing neuro-ectodermal 1992;21:493—502.
differentiation, shows morphological, ultrastructural and/or [6] Gu M, Antonescu CR, Guiter G, Huvos AG, Ladanyi M, Zakowski
immunohistochemical characteristics of epithelial tumours. MF. Cytokeratin immunoreactivity in Ewing’s sarcoma: preva-
It is essential for these two entities to be distinguished lence in 50 cases confirmed by molecular diagnostic studies.
Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:410—6.
as the prognosis and treatment are different. In the most
[7] Greco MA, Steiner GC, Fazzini E. Ewing’s sarcoma with epithe-
difficult cases, the differential diagnosis is based on cytoge-
lial differentiation: fine structural and immunocytochemical
netic studies to identify the genetic abnormalities typical
study. Ultrastruct Pathol 1988;12:317—25.
of Ewing’s sarcoma, notably (11;22) translocation and/or
[8] Vakar-Lopez F, Ayala AG, Raymond AK, Czerniak B. Epithe-
EWS/FLI1 or EWS/ERG fusion genes [1,11—13]. These genetic
lial phenotype in Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuro-ectodermal
abnormalities are not present in adamantinoma [1,14].
tumor. Int J Surg Pathol 2000;8:59—65.
We did not perform a cytogenetic study for our case.
[9] Moll R, Lee I, Gould VE, Berndt R, Roessner A, Franke WW.
However, the clinical, radiological and especially progres- Immunocytochemical analysis of Ewing’s tumors. Patterns of
sion data provided sufficient information for this tumour to expression of intermediate filaments and desmosomal proteins
be labeled as Ewing-like adamantinoma. Histological assess- indicate cell type heterogeneity and pluripotential differenti-
ation. Am J Pathol 1987;127:288—304.
ment of the tumour after 2 years of progression revealed a
Ewing-like adamantinoma 849
[10] Van Haelst UJGM, de Haas van Dorsser AH. A perplexing malig- EWS-FLI1 fusion gene: a case report. Virchows Arch 2006;449:
nant bone tumor. Highly malignant so-called adamantinoma or 579—84.
non-typical Ewing’s sarcoma. Virchows Arch 1975;365:63—74. [13] Folpe AL, Goldblum JR, Rubin BP, Shehata BM, Liu W, Dei Tos
[11] Bridge JA, Fidler ME, Neff JR, Degenhardt J, Wang M, AP, et al. Morphologic and immunophenotypic diversity in Ewing
Walker C, et al. Adamantinoma-like Ewing’s sarcoma: genomic family tumors. A study of 66 genetically confirmed cases. Am
confirmation, phenotypic drift. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23: J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1025—33.
159—65. [14] Hauben E, Van den Broek LJCM, Van Marck E, Hogendoorn PCW.
[12] Fujii H, Honoki K, Enomoto Y, Kasai T, Kido A, Amano Adamantinoma-like Ewing’s sarcoma and Ewing-like adamanti-
I, et al. Adamantinoma-like Ewing’s sarcoma with noma. The t(11;22), t(21;22) status. J Pathol 2001;195:218—21.