2012-KBS-POM-Magazine.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Law School Record, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Fall 1957) Law School Record Editors
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound The nivU ersity of Chicago Law School Record Law School Publications Fall 9-1-1957 Law School Record, vol. 7, no. 1 (Fall 1957) Law School Record Editors Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/lawschoolrecord Recommended Citation Law School Record Editors, "Law School Record, vol. 7, no. 1 (Fall 1957)" (1957). The University of Chicago Law School Record. Book 20. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/lawschoolrecord/20 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Publications at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in The University of Chicago Law School Record by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume 7 Number 1 ' ,';," . :},',�." .' :�i;.:· �,,�,,<.-,:-::,,�;;��(,>,.' :� ' . "., �:,�� ',' . "', .. l ! • , � -.I ,( ", • , 2 The Law School Record Vol. 7, No.1 Invocation Almighty God, creator and sustainer of all life, without whose bless ing and sufferance no human work can long prosper, we praise Thee for that which we have begun in this place and time. vVe thank Thee for the sense of justice which Thou hast implanted within mankind and for the readiness of men and communities to uphold and preserve a just order. We thank Thee for the dedication and vision of leaders in this com munity which have led to this new undertaking, for teachers and students committed to justice and human dignity, and for the noble heritage upon which this new venture is built. We pray, 0 God, for Thy guidance and direction in all our labors. -
1930 Journal
; ; MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 19 3 0 -f^^ 1 SUPEEME COURT OE THE UisTITED STATES Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Van Devanter, Mr. Justice McReynolds, Mr. Justice Brandeis, Mr. Jus- tice Sutherland, Mr. Justice Butler, Mr. Justice Stone, and Mr. Justice Roberts. Louis Charney Friedman, of Paterson, N. J.; A. F. Kingdon, of Bluefield, W. Va. ; Edward H. Dell, of Middletown, Ohio ; Francis P. Farrell, of New York City; John E. Snyder, of Hershey, Pa.; Francis E. Delamore, of Little Rock, Ark.; William R. Carlisle, of New York City; William Geo. Junge, of Los Angeles, Calif.; Francis Harold Uriell, of Chicago, 111.; John Butera, of Dallas, Tex.; Alean Brisley Clutts, of Detroit, Mich.; Cornelius B. Comegys, of Scranton, Pa.; Walter J. Rosston, of New York City; John A. Coleman, of Los Angeles, Calif. Harry F. Brown, of Guthrie, Okla. ; Wm. W. Montgomery, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa.; Joe E. Daniels, of New York City; Winthrop Wadleigh, of Milford, N. H.; Ernest C. Griffith, of Los Angeles, Calif. ; and K. Berry Peterson, of Phoenix, Ariz., were admitted to practice. No. 380* R. D. Spicer et al., petitioners, v. The United States of America No. 381. G. C. Stephens, petitioner, v. The United States of America; and No. 382. B. M. Wotkyns, petitioner, v. The United States of America. Leave granted the respondent to file brief on or before October 20, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Thacher for the respondent. No. 5. Indian Motocycle Company v. The United States of Amer- ica. Joint motion to amend certificate submitted by Mr. -
Law School Announcements 1967-1968 Law School Announcements Editors [email protected]
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound University of Chicago Law School Announcements Law School Publications 9-30-1967 Law School Announcements 1967-1968 Law School Announcements Editors [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ lawschoolannouncements Recommended Citation Editors, Law School Announcements, "Law School Announcements 1967-1968" (1967). University of Chicago Law School Announcements. Book 92. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/lawschoolannouncements/92 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Publications at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Law School Announcements by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago The Law School Announcements 1967-1968 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL Inquiries should be addressed as follows: Requests for information, materials, and application forms for admission and finan cial aid: For the J.D. Program: DEAN OF STUDENTS The Law School The University of Chicago I II I East ooth Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 Telephone MIdway 3-0800, Extension 2406 For the Graduate Programs: ASSISTANT DEAN (GRADUATE STUDIES) The Law School The University of Chicago I I I I East ooth Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 Telephone MIdway 3-0800, Extension 2433 Housing for Single Students: OFFICE OF STUDENT HOUSING The University of Chicago 580 I Ellis Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60637 Telephone MIdway 3-0800, Extension 3149 Housing for Married Students: OFFICE OF MARRIED STUDENT HOUSING The University of Chicago 824 East 58th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 Telephone 752-3644 Payment of Fees and Deposits: THE BURSAR The University of Chicago 5801 Ellis Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60637 Telephone MIdway 3-0800, Extension 3146 The University of Chicago Founded by John D. -
Robert R. Mccormick and Near V. Minnesota
Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 60 Issue 2 Article 3 3-2008 The Colonel's Finest Campaign: Robert R. McCormick and Near v. Minnesota Eric B. Easton University of Baltimore School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj Part of the Communications Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Fourth Amendment Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation Easton, Eric B. (2008) "The Colonel's Finest Campaign: Robert R. McCormick and Near v. Minnesota," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 60 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol60/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Communications Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Colonel's Finest Campaign: Robert R. McCormick and Near v. Minnesota Eric B. Easton* I. NEAR V. MINNESOTA: BACKGROUND ...................................... 185 II. INCORPORATION: THE NECESSARY PRECONDITION .............. 188 III. COL. MCCORMICK TAKES CHARGE OF NEAR ........................ 196 IV. BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT ............................................... 216 V . THE D ECISION ........................................................................ 221 VI. THE AFTERM ATH .................................................................... 226 "The mere statement of the case makes my blood boil." So wrote Weymouth Kirkland to his most illustrious client, Col. Robert R. McCormick of The Chicago Tribune ("Tribune") on Sept. 14, 1928.' The prominent Chicago attorney was writing about a case then styled State ex rel. Olson v. Gui/ford,2 but which would make history as Near v. -
![[The Hughes Court and Radical Dissent]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/7891/the-hughes-court-and-radical-dissent-8577891.webp)
[The Hughes Court and Radical Dissent]
1 Chapter --- [Civil Liberties and Civil Rights] In early April 1937 the Supreme Court struck down black Communist Angelo Herndon‟s conviction for attempting to incite insurrection. The next day Felix Frankfurter wrote his protégé Charles Wyzanski, then serving in the Solicitor General‟s office, “I should like to bet you 10 to 1 that for the rest of the term the Court will sustain everything that should be sustained and invalidate, as in the Herndon case, everything that will vindicate the Court as the unflagging guardian of our liberties!”1 Frankfurter was hardly prescient about the Court‟s likely approach to economic cases; the Court had already upheld the National Labor Relations Act two weeks earlier. His implicit linkage of Herndon and the economic cases did signal the beginning of the new Court‟s confrontation with the two issues. In the course of that confrontation the modern law of civil rights and civil liberties was born. Frankfurter‟s cynical observation about Herndon signaled the difficulties the Court‟s new members, including within a few years Frankfurter himself, would face. The Progressive jurisprudence that Frankfurter shared and to which he had contributed gave Roosevelt‟s justices few resources to use in cases involving civil liberties and civil rights. In its broad sweep that jurisprudence emphasized that constitutional analysis must take seriously the importance of social values asserted by democratic legislatures; in its application of judicial review it cautioned strongly against judicial displacement of social value choices in the name of what justices said were enduring values but that were likely to be simply the values the justices personally ranked most highly. -
Robert R. Mccormick and Near V. Minnesota Eric Easton University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected]
University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 3-2008 The olonel'C s Finest Campaign: Robert R. McCormick and Near v. Minnesota Eric Easton University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the First Amendment Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation The oC lonel's Finest Campaign: Robert R. McCormick and Near v. Minnesota, 60 Fed. Comm. L.J. 183 (2008) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Colonel's Finest Campaign: Robert R. McCormick and Near v. Minnesota Eric B. Easton* I. NEAR V. MINNESOTA: BACKGROUND ...................................... 185 II. INCORPORATION: THE NECESSARY PRECONDITION .............. 188 III. COL. MCCORMICK TAKES CHARGE OF NEAR ........................ 196 N. BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT ............................................... 216 V. THE DECISION ........................................................................ 221 VI. THE AFTERMATH .................................................................... 226 "The mere statement of the case makes my blood boil." So wrote Weymouth Kirkland to his most illustrious client, Col. Robert R. McCormick of The Chicago Tribune ("Tribune") on Sept. 14, 1928. 1 The prominent Chicago attorney was writing about a case then styled State ex rei. Olson v. Guiljord,2 but which would make history as Near v. Minnesota3 when it reached its conclusion in the United States • Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law.