DOCSLIB.ORG

5. Guidelines for the Management of Malignant Ascites in Palliative Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5. Guidelines for the Management of Malignant Ascites in Palliative Care 5. GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF MALIGNANT ASCITES IN PALLIATIVE CARE 5.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES Ascites is the accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity. 1, 2 Malignancy is the underlying cause in approximately 10% of all cases of ascites. About 15- 50% of patients with malignancy will develop ascites. 3 Cancers commonly associated with the development of ascites include breast, colorectal, endometrial, gastric, ovarian and pancreatic. 3 Non-malignant causes of ascites include liver disease, congestive cardiac failure, nephrotic syndrome, pancreatitis, tuberculosis and bowel perforation. 2, 3 Several different pathophysiological mechanisms are implicated in the development of malignant ascites. These include: 4 − peritoneal lymphatic obstruction. − hypoalbuminaemia leading to a reduction in oncotic pressure. − increased capillary permeability. − increased portal vein pressure with activation of the renin-angiotensin pathway. Symptoms resulting from an accumulation of ascitic fluid include abdominal bloating / swelling, pain, nausea and vomiting, anorexia, fatigue, peripheral oedema, heartburn and dyspnoea. 5 Malignant ascites carries a poor prognosis. Management should be aimed at maximising patient comfort and quality of life. 7 Management options for malignant ascites include diuretic therapy, therapeutic paracentesis and peritoneovenous shunts. 8 Oncological interventions may be helpful in ovarian carcinoma and lymphoma. Hormonal therapy may be useful in hormone sensitive malignancies such as some breast cancers. 2, 7 9 There is no evidence that any particular therapeutic option is more effective than another. 5.2 GUIDELINES 5.2.1 Diuretic therapy Diuretic therapy should be considered in every patient with malignant ascites particularly those with a prognosis of greater than 4 weeks. Urea and electrolytes should be checked before starting treatment and during treatment as appropriate. 8, 10 [Level 4] Spironolactone Spironolactone is the diuretic of choice in malignant ascites.11 It works by competitively blocking aldosterone leading to an increase in sodium excretion. It is a potassium sparing diuretic. Patients with raised plasma concentrations of renin and massive liver metastases are most likely to respond. 10, 11, 12 [Level 2] Dose: 100mg-400mg daily. For elderly patients consider a lower starting dose and titrate according to individual response. It may take 3-5 days to get a response. The dose should be increased every 3-7 days in 50mg-100mg increments. The maximum dose is 400mg/day. However, many patients will be too frail to tolerate such large doses. 10, 11, 12 [Level 2] Side effects include nausea, headache, lethargy, delirium, hyperkalaemia, skin rashes, diarrhoea and hyponatraemia. 10, 11, 12 [Level 2] Furosemide Furosemide is a loop diuretic and should be added if there is an inadequate response to spironolactone. Dose: 40mg-80mg/day. Side effects include electrolyte imbalance, hypotension and gastrointestinal disturbance. 10, 12 [Level 3] 5.2.2 Therapeutic paracentesis [Level 3] Paracentesis is the removal of fluid from the peritoneum via a catheter / venflon inserted through the abdominal wall. 13 Paracentesis is a useful procedure for the control of acute symptoms, or in those patients who are resistant to diuretics. It provides relief in about 90% of cases. 13 Paracentesis can be performed in a variety of settings and should ideally be within 48 hours of presentation. 14, 15 Diagnostic imaging is not necessary prior to paracentesis if clinical examination demonstrates the presence of a large volume of ascitic fluid. Ultrasound evaluation may be required prior to paracentesis if there is diagnostic uncertainty or suspected loculation of fluid. Loculation is especially common in ovarian carcinoma. 6 Consider checking a full blood count and clotting screen prior to paracentesis if the patient is bleeding, has liver metastases, is jaundiced, or is on anticoagulant therapy. Biochemistry should be checked if there is a history of renal impairment. 16 Before undertaking paracentesis it is important to gain informed consent from the patient and document this in the case notes. 16 [Level 4] Practice varies as to the volume of ascitic fluid removed and the rate of fluid removal. Clamping of the drain is often not required. Fluid should be drained as quickly as is comfortable for the patient, limited only by their clinical condition. 17, 18 The bladder should be emptied before paracentesis. Analgesia should be available before, during, and following the procedure. 16 Ascitic drains should be removed when no longer in use due to the risk of infection. 19 There is no evidence to support the use of albumin infusions either during or after paracentesis for malignant ascites. Use of intravenous fluids is not recommended. 14, 19 It may be necessary to repeat the paracentesis for ongoing symptom control.16 Absolute contraindications to paracentesis include disseminated intravascular coagulation and clinical evidence of fibrinolysis. Relative contraindications include severe bowel distension and previous extensive abdominal/ pelvic surgery. 20 Possible complications include secondary peritonitis, pulmonary emboli and hypotension.7 5.2.3 Peritoneovenous shunts Peritoneovenous shunts drain ascitic fluid from the peritoneal space into the internal jugular vein. Shunts should be considered if recurrent ascites is the main clinical problem and the prognosis is measured in months rather than weeks. 13 [Level 3] Shunts may limit the need for diuretics and paracentesis. The two main types of shunts are Denver and Le Veen. 21 [Level 4] Shunts can be inserted under local anaesthetic. The complication rate following shunt insertion is high and includes shunt malfunction, leakage, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, thromboembolism and pulmonary oedema. 21, 22 [Level 3] 5.2.4 Octreotide This is a synthetic somatostatin analogue which acts by reducing the volume of fluid secretion by the intestinal mucosa and by increasing the rate of resorption. It can be useful in chylous ascites. The dose is 200microgrammes-600microgrammes via a continuous subcutaneous infusion over 24 hours. 23 [Level 4] 5.2.5 Cytotoxic Therapy Systemic therapy may be of benefit if the primary disease is known to be responsive to cytotoxics e.g. breast, ovary. Intraperitoneal therapy has been shown to be of benefit in some 2, tumour types but its use is limited to small volume / micrometastatic intraperitoneal disease. 24 [Level 3] 5.3 STANDARDS 1. Patients who have acute symptoms attributable to ascites should have paracentesis within 48 hours of presentation. 16 [Grade D] 2. All patients should have baseline urea and electrolytes checked prior to commencing and whilst taking diuretic therapy. 16 [Grade D] 3. Intravenous fluids/ albumin should not be used routinely during or following therapeutic paracentesis but may be appropriate in severe hypovolaemia. 14, 19 [Grade D] 4. Abdominal drains should be removed within 24 hours of insertion if there is limited drainage, unless there is a clinical indication for leaving them in situ for a longer period of time. 24 [Grade C] 5.4 REFERENCES 1. Taber CW. Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary. Philadelphia (PA). FA Davies Co. 1965. A-92. 2. Kichian K, Bain VG. Jaundice, ascites and encephalopathy. In: Hanks GWC, Cherny NI, Calman K, Doyle D. (eds) Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine: 3rd edition. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 2005. p.507-519. 3. Runyon BA. Care of patients with ascites. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 337-42. 4. Runyon BA, Hoefs JC, Morgan TR. Ascitic fluid analysis in malignancy-related ascites. Hepatology 1982; 8: 1104-1109. 5. Williams JW, Simel DL. Does this patient have ascites? How to divide fluid within the abdomen. JAMA 1992; 267; 2645-2648. 6. Thoeni R. The role of imaging in patients with ascites. Am J Radiol 1995; 165: 16-18. 7. Parsons SL, Watson SA, Steele RJ. Malignant ascites. Br J Surg 1996; 83(1): 6-14. 8. Lee CW, Bocick G, Faught W. A survey of practice in the management of malignant ascites. J Pain Symptom Manage 1998; 16(2): 96-101. 9. Becker G, Galandi D, Blum HE. Malignant ascites: Systematic review and guidelines for treatment. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 589-597. 10. Pockros PJ, Esrason KT, Nguyen C, Duque J, Woods S. Mobilisation of malignant ascites with diuretic is dependent on ascitic fluid characteristics. Gastroenterology 1992; 103(4): 1302-1306. 11. Greenway B, Johnson PJ, Williams R. Control of malignant ascites with Spironolactone. Br J Surg 1982; 69: 441-442. 12. Joint Formulary Committee, British National Formulary 58, London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. 2009. 13. Campbell C. Controlling malignant ascites. Eur J Palliat Care 2001; 8(5): 187-190. 14. McNamara P. Paracentesis – an effective method of symptom control in the palliative care setting? Palliat Med 2000; 14(1): 62-64. 15. Moorsom D. Paracentesis in a home care setting. Palliat Med 2001; 15(2): 169-170. 16. Merseyside and Cheshire Palliative Care Network Audit Group. Management of Ascites in Palliative Care. Expert consensus. July 2005 17. Ratcliff CR, Hutchinson M, Conner C. Rapid paracentesis of large volumes of ascitic fluid. Oncol Nurse Forum 1991; 8(8): 1416. 18. Gotlieb WH, Feldman B, Feldman-Moran O, Zmira N, Kreizer D, Segal Y et al. Intraperitoneal pressures and clinical parameters of total paracentesis for palliation of symptomatic ascites in ovarian cancer. Gynaecol Oncol 1998; 71: 381-385. 19. Stephenson J, Gilbert J. The development of clinical guidelines on paracentesis for ascites related to malignancy. Palliat Med 2002; 16(3): 213-218. 20. McGibbon A, Chen GI, Peltekian KM, van Zanten S. An evidence-based manual for abdominal paracentesis. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52(12): 3307-3315. 21. Schumacher DL, Saclarides TJ, Staven ED. Peritoneovenous shunts for palliation of patients with malignant ascites. Ann Surg Oncol 1994; 1(5): 378-281. 22. Wickremesekera SK, Stubbs RS. Peritoneovenous shunting for malignant ascites. N Z Med J 1997; 110(1037): 33-35. 23. Cairns W, Malone R. Octreotide as an agent for the relief of malignant ascites in palliative care patients. Palliat Med 1999; 13(5): 429-430.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laparoscopy As a Diagnostic Tool in Ascites of Unknown Origin: a Retrospective Study Conducted at Kasturba Hospital, Manipal
    Research Article Open Access J Surg Volume 8 Issue 3 - March 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Chetan R Kulkarni DOI: 10.19080/OAJS.2018.08.555740 Laparoscopy as a Diagnostic Tool in Ascites of Unknown Origin: A Retrospective Study Conducted at Kasturba Hospital, Manipal Chetan R Kulkarni1*, Badareesh Laxminarayan2 and Annappa Kudva3 1Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal 2Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal 3Professor, Department of Surgery, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal Received: February 16, 2018; Published: March 01, 2018 *Corresponding author: Chetan R Kulkarni, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, India. Tel: 9535974395;Email: Abstract Background: Laparoscopy as a minimally invasive technique has long played an important role in the evaluation of ascites. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on the record of 80patients who underwent laparoscopy after appropriate investigations had failed to reveal the cause of ascites. Results: Tuberculous peritonitis was reported in 46(57%), malignancies in 18(25%), cirrhosis in 4(5%) and peritonitis of unknown etiology in 8(10%)Conclusion: of patients. Two (2.5%) patients had complications, an Ileal perforation and in other Incisional hernia. Keywords: Ascites;Laparoscopy Diagnostic was Laparoscopy able to diagnose the pathology in 72 (90%) patients with ascites of unknown origin. Introduction Laparoscopy, as a minimally invasive technique has developed rapidly in recent years. Endoscopic examination of conventional laboratory examinations (including ascitic fluid cell count, albumin level, total protein level, Gram stain, culture who termed it as “Celioscopy” [1,2]. The term ‘ascites’ refers to and cytology ) as well as after imaging investigations (including peritoneal cavity was first attempted in 1901 by George Kelling Materialultrasound andand CT Methods scan).
    [Show full text]
  • Recurrent Pneumothorax Following Abdominal Paracentesis
    Postgrad Med J (1990) 66, 319 - 320 © The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1990 Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.66.774.319 on 1 April 1990. Downloaded from Recurrent pneumothorax following abdominal paracentesis P.J. Stafford Department ofMedicine, Newham General Hospital, Glen Road, Plaistow, London E13, UK. Summary: A 62 year old man presented with abdominal ascites, without pleural effusion, due to peritoneal mesothelioma. He had chronic obstructive airways disease and a past history of right upper lobectomy for tuberculosis. On two occasions abdominal paracentesis was followed within 72 hours by pneumothorax. This previously unreported complication of abdominal paracentesis may be due to increased diaphragmatic excursion following the procedure and should be considered in patients with preexisting lung disease. Introduction Abdominal paracentesis is a widely used palliative right iliac fossa. Approximately 4 litres of turbid therapy for malignant ascites and is generally fluid was drained over 72 hours. The protein accepted as a procedure with few adverse effects: concentration was 46 g/l and microbiology and pneumothorax is not a recognized complication. I cytology were not diagnostic. Laparoscopy re- report a patient with recurrent pneumothorax vealed matted loops of bowel with widespread apparently precipitated by abdominal paracen- peritoneal seedlings. Histological examination of copyright. tesis. these lesions showed malignant mesothelioma of the epithelioid type. The patient suffered a left pneumothorax within Case report 48 hours ofparacentesis (before laparoscopy). This was treated with intercostal underwater drainage A 62 year old civil servant presented with a 6-week but recurred on two attempts to remove the drain, history ofworsening abdominal distension.
    [Show full text]
  • Atypical Abdominal Pain in a Patient with Liver Cirrhosis
    IMAGE IN HEPATOLOGY January-February, Vol. 17 No. 1, 2018: 162-164 The Official Journal of the Mexican Association of Hepatology, the Latin-American Association for Study of the Liver and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver Atypical Abdominal Pain in a Patient With Liver Cirrhosis Liz Toapanta-Yanchapaxi,* Eid-Lidt Guering,** Ignacio García-Juárez* * Gastroenterology Department. National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán”. Mexico City. Mexico. ** Interventional Cardiology. National Institute of Cardiology “Ignacio Chávez”. Mexico City. Mexico. ABSTRACTABSTABSTABSTRACT The causes of abdominal pain in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites are well-known but occasionally, atypical causes arise. We report the case of a patient with a ruptured, confined abdominal aortic aneurysm. KeyK words.o d .K .Key Liver cirrhosis. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. INTRODUCTION CASE REPORT Abdominal pain in cirrhotic patients is a challenge. A 47-year-old male with the established diagnosis of Clinical presentation can be non-specific and the need for alcohol-related liver cirrhosis, presented to the emer- early surgical exploration may be difficult to assess. Coag- gency department for abdominal pain. He was classified ulopathy, thrombocytopenia, varices, and ascites need to as Child Pugh (CP) C stage (10 points) and had a model be taken into account, since they can increase the surgical for end stage liver disease (MELD) - sodium (Na) of 21 risk. Possible differential diagnoses include: Complicated points. The pain was referred to the left iliac fossa, with umbilical, inguinal or postoperative incisional hernias, an intensity of 10/10. It was associated to low back pain acute cholecystitis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, pep- with radicular stigmata (primarily S1).
    [Show full text]
  • High Risk Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes: Issues to Consider
    NUTRITIONINFLAMMATORY ISSUES BOWEL IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, DISEASE: A PRACTICAL SERIES APPROACH, #105 SERIES #73 Carol Rees Parrish, M.S., R.D., Series Editor High Risk Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes: Issues to Consider Iris Vance Neeral Shah Percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are a valuable tool for providing long- term enteral nutrition or gastric decompression; certain circumstances that complicate PEG placement warrant novel approaches and merit review and discussion. Ascites and portal hypertension with varices have been associated with poorer outcomes. Bleeding is one of the most common serious complications affecting approximately 2.5% of all procedures. This article will review what evidence exists in these high risk scenarios and attempt to provide more clarity when considering these challenging clinical circumstances. INTRODUCTION ince the first Percutaneous Endoscopic has been found by multiple authors to portend a poor Gastrostomy tube was placed in 1979 (1), they prognosis in PEG placement (3,4, 5,6,7,8). This review Shave become an invaluable tool for providing will endeavor to provide more clarity when considering long-term enteral nutrition (EN) and are commonly used these challenging clinical circumstances. in patients with dysphagia following stroke, disabling motor neuron diseases such as multiple sclerosis and Ascites & Gastric Varices amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and in those with head The presence of ascites is frequently viewed as a and neck cancer.They are also used for patients with relative, if not absolute, contraindication to PEG prolonged mechanical intubation, as well as gastric placement. Ascites adds technical difficulties and the decompression in those with severe gastroparesis, risk for potential complications (see Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Intestinal and Multiple Organ Transplantation 1679
    1678 TRANSPLANT ATION euglycemia and survive longer than 200 islets in allogeneic and xenogeneic diabetic hosts. Transplant Proc 1993; 25:953-954. 67. Gotoh M, Maki T, Satomi S, et al: Immunological characteristics of purified islet grafts. Transplantation 1986; 42j387. 68. Klima G, Konigsrainer A, Schmid T, et al: Is the pancreas reo jected independently of the kidney after combined pancreatic­ renal transplantation? Transplant Proc 1988; 20:665. 69. Prowse 5J, Bellgrau D, Lafferty KJ: Islet allografts are destroyed by disease recurrence in the spontaneously diabetic BB rat. Di­ abetes 1986; 35:110. 70. Markmann JF, Posselt AM, Bassiri H, et al: Major-histocompat­ ibility-complex restricted and nonrestricted autoil1'\mune effec­ tor mechanisms in BB rats. Transplantation 1991; 52:662-667. 71. Navarro X, Kennedy WR, Loewenson RB, et al: Influence of pancreas transplantation on cardiorespiratory reflexes, nerve conduction, and mortality in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1990; 39:802. 72. Weber q, Silva FG, Hardy MA, et al: Effect of islet transplan­ tation on renal function and morphology of short- and long­ term diabetic rats. Transplant Proc 1979; 11:549. 73. Gotzche 0, Gunderson HJ, Osterby R: Irreversibility of glomer­ ular basement membrane accumulation despite reversibility of renal hypertrophy with islet transplantation in early diabetes. Diabetes 1981; 30:481. 74. Fung H, Alessini M, Abu-Elmagd K, et al: Adverse effects asso­ ciated with the use ofFK 506. Transplant Proc 1991; 23:3105. 75. Tzakis AG: Personal communication, 1991. I CHAPTER 185 Figure 185-1. Cluster allograft (shaded portion), including the liver, pancreas, and duodenal segment of small intestine. (From Starzl TE, Todo S.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on the Management of Ascites in Cirrhosis
    Downloaded from gut.bmjjournals.com on 25 September 2006 Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis K P Moore and G P Aithal Gut 2006;55;1-12 doi:10.1136/gut.2006.099580 Updated information and services can be found at: http://gut.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/55/suppl_6/vi1 These include: References This article cites 148 articles, 21 of which can be accessed free at: http://gut.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/55/suppl_6/vi1#BIBL Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the service top right corner of the article Topic collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections Liver, including hepatitis (945 articles) Notes To order reprints of this article go to: http://www.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprintform To subscribe to Gut go to: http://www.bmjjournals.com/subscriptions/ Downloaded from gut.bmjjournals.com on 25 September 2006 vi1 GUIDELINES Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis K P Moore, G P Aithal ............................................................................................................................... Gut 2006;55(Suppl VI):vi1–vi12. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.099580 1.0 INTRODUCTION N Grade 1 (mild). Ascites is only detectable by ultrasound examination. Ascites is a major complication of cirrhosis,1 occurring in 50% of patients over 10 years of N Grade 2 (moderate). Ascites causing moderate follow up.2 The development of ascites is an symmetrical distension of the abdomen. important landmark in the natural history of N Grade 3 (large). Ascites causing marked cirrhosis as it is associated with a 50% mortality abdominal distension.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedure Coding in ICD-9-CM and ICD- 10-PCS
    Procedure Coding in ICD-9-CM and ICD- 10-PCS ICD-9-CM Volume 3 Procedures are classified in volume 3 of ICD-9-CM, and this section includes both an Alphabetic Index and a Tabular List. This volume follows the same format, organization and conventions as the classification of diseases in volumes 1 and 2. ICD-10-PCS ICD-10-PCS will replace volume 3 of ICD-9-CM. Unlike ICD-10-CM for diagnoses, which is similar in structure and format as the ICD-9-CM volumes 1 and 2, ICD-10-PCS is a completely different system. ICD-10-PCS has a multiaxial seven-character alphanumeric code structure providing unique codes for procedures. The table below gives a brief side-by-side comparison of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-PCS. ICD-9-CM Volume3 ICD-10-PCS Follows ICD structure (designed for diagnosis Designed and developed to meet healthcare coding) needs for a procedure code system Codes available as a fixed or finite set in list form Codes constructed from flexible code components (values) using tables Codes are numeric Codes are alphanumeric Codes are 3-4 digits long All codes are seven characters long ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-PCS are used to code only hospital inpatient procedures. Hospital outpatient departments, other ambulatory facilities, and physician practices are required to use CPT and HCPCS to report procedures. ICD-9-CM Conventions in Volume 3 Code Also In volume 3, the phrase “code also” is a reminder to code additional procedures only when they have actually been performed.
    [Show full text]
  • AASLD Position Paper : Liver Biopsy
    AASLD POSITION PAPER Liver Biopsy Don C. Rockey,1 Stephen H. Caldwell,2 Zachary D. Goodman,3 Rendon C. Nelson,4 and Alastair D. Smith5 This position paper has been approved by the AASLD and College of Cardiology and the American Heart Associa- represents the position of the association. tion Practice Guidelines3).4 Introduction Preamble Histological assessment of the liver, and thus, liver bi- These recommendations provide a data-supported ap- opsy, is a cornerstone in the evaluation and management proach. They are based on the following: (1) formal re- of patients with liver disease and has long been considered view and analysis of the recently published world to be an integral component of the clinician’s diagnostic literature on the topic; (2) American College of Physi- armamentarium. Although sensitive and relatively accu- cians Manual for Assessing Health Practices and De- rate blood tests used to detect and diagnose liver disease signing Practice Guidelines1; (3) guideline policies, have now become widely available, it is likely that liver including the AASLD Policy on the Development and biopsy will remain a valuable diagnostic tool. Although Use of Practice Guidelines and the American Gastro- histological evaluation of the liver has become important enterological Association Policy Statement on Guide- in assessing prognosis and in tailoring treatment, nonin- lines2; and (4) the experience of the authors in the vasive techniques (i.e., imaging, blood tests) may replace specified topic. use of liver histology in this setting, particularly with re- Intended for use by physicians, these recommenda- gard to assessment of the severity of liver fibrosis.5,6 Sev- tions suggest preferred approaches to the diagnostic, ther- eral techniques may be used to obtain liver tissue; a table apeutic, and preventive aspects of care.
    [Show full text]
  • Chyle Leak Post Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Case Report, Literature Review and Management Options
    7 Case Report Page 1 of 7 Chyle leak post laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report, literature review and management options Ferdinand Ong1, Amitabha Das1, Kheman Rajkomar2 1Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia Correspondence to: Dr. Kheman Rajkomar. Eldridge Road, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown NSW 2200, Sydney, Australia. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Chyle leak after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is very rarely reported. However, it is needs to be recognised promptly and managed as otherwise it can lead to further metabolic and infective complications. We present the case of a 48 years old man who was admitted with ultrasound proven acute calculous cholecystitis. His vital signs were within normal range but his murphy’s sign was positive. His white cell count (WCC) and liver function tests were within normal limit. He underwent an uneventful standard LC with cholangiography during the same admission with no anomalous biliary or hepatic arterial anatomy noted during the procedure. Post operatively he was noted to have 125 mL of white fluid in his drain. The fluid triglyceride was 23.2 mmol/L, cholesterol level was 2.8 mmol/L, and drain/serum triglyceride of 15.5, hence confirming it to be chyle. He was clinically otherwise very well. He was managed conservatively as a low volume chyle leak with a fat free diet. The triglyceride content in the drain effluent decreased to 1.3mmol/L by day 6 and the fluid turned straw coloured in that interval. The drain was removed and the patient discharged home without any further issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Perforated Duodenal Ulcer an Alternative Therapeutic Plan
    SPECIAL ARTICLE Perforated Duodenal Ulcer An Alternative Therapeutic Plan Arthur J. Donovan, MD; Thomas V. Berne, MD; John A. Donovan, MD n alternative plan for the treatment of a perforated duodenal ulcer is proposed. We will focus on the now-recognized role of Helicobacter pylori in the genesis of the ma- jority of duodenal ulcers and on the high rate of success of therapy with a combina- tion of antibiotics and a proton-pump inhibitor or histamine2 blocker in treatment of suchA ulcers. Knowledge that half the cases of perforated duodenal ulcer may have securely sealed spontaneously at the time of presentation is incorporated in the therapeutic plan. Patients with a perforated duodenal ulcer who have already been evaluated for H pylori and are not infected or, if infected, have received appropriate therapy should undergo an ulcer-definitive operation if they are suitable surgical candidates. Most authorities recommend surgical closure of the perforation and a parietal cell vagotomy. The remaining patients should have a gastroduodenogram with water- soluble contrast medium. If the perforation is sealed, the patient can be treated nonsurgically. If the perforation is leaking, secure surgical closure of the perforation is necessary. Following recov- ery from the immediate consequences of the perforation, evaluation for H pylori should be con- ducted. If the patient is infected, combined medical therapy is recommended. If the patient is not infected, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome should be ruled out and medical therapy is recommended if the ulcer has not been treated previously. Elective ulcer-definitive surgery should be considered for the occasional uninfected patient who has already received appropriate medical therapy for the ulcer.
    [Show full text]
  • Postoperative Management After Hepatic Resection Lindsay J
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Vol 3, No 1, March 2012 41 Review Article Postoperative management after hepatic resection Lindsay J. Wrighton, Karen R. O’Bosky, Jukes P. Namm, Maheswari Senthil Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA ABSTRACT Hepatic resection has become the mainstay of treatment for both primary and certain secondary malignancies. Outcomes after hepatic resection have significantly improved with advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques and perioperative care. Metabolic and functional changes after hepatic resection are unique and cause significant challenges in manage- ment. In-depth understanding of hepatic physiology is essential to properly address the postoperative issues. Strategies implemented in the postoperative period to improve outcomes include adequate nutritional support, proper glycemic control, and interventions to reduce postoperative infectious complications among several others. This review article fo- cuses on the major postoperative issues after hepatic resection and presents the current management. KEY WORDS Management; postoperative; hepatic resection; liver resection J Gastrointest Oncol 2012;3:41-47. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.003 Introduction are further accentuated by derangements of liver function. Maintenance of adequate fluid balance and normal renal Outcomes after hepatic resection have significantly function is critical. Cirrhotics are prone to fluid shifts, improved over the last few decades (1-4). Although, no vasodilation and resultant hypotension. In this setting, single factor is solely responsible, overall advances in colloids rather than crystalloids should be administered surgical and anesthetic techniques, better understanding to restore intravascular volume. New onset postoperative of hepatic physiology and improvement in perioperative ascites frequently occurs in cirrhotic patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysphagia to Liver Failure Vincent Ting Fung Cheung,1 Jey Singanayagam,2 Angus Molyneux,3 Neil Rajoriya1
    Images in… BMJ Case Reports: first published as 10.1136/bcr-2015-212522 on 26 November 2015. Downloaded from Dysphagia to liver failure Vincent Ting Fung Cheung,1 Jey Singanayagam,2 Angus Molyneux,3 Neil Rajoriya1 1Department of DESCRIPTION Gastroenterology, Milton A 54-year-old man presenting with dysphagia, Keynes University Hospital, Milton Keynes, UK weight loss, epigastric pain and cervical lymphaden- 2Department of Radiology, opathy was referred directly to endoscopy. The Milton Keynes University medical history included hypertension and hyper- Hospital, Milton Keynes, UK 3 cholesterolaemia. Blood tests showed normal biliru- Department of bin, aspartate transaminase (AST) 490 iu/L, Histopathology, Milton Keynes γ University Hospital, Milton -glutamyl transferase (GGT) 535 iu/L, alkaline Keynes, UK phosphatase (ALP) 829 iu/L and prothrombin time (PT) 13 s. Correspondence to Gastroscopy showed a lower oesophageal lesion Dr Vincent Ting Fung Cheung, fi [email protected] ( gure 1) with biopsies showing high-grade dyspla- sia. A CT scan showed lower oesophageal wall Accepted 19 September 2015 thickening and multiple lymphadenopathy in the chest/abdomen but no liver metastases (figure 2). The local multidisciplinary team meeting outcome was for repeat oesophageal biopsies and supraclavi- cular lymph node biopsy to exclude a lymphoma. The patient thereafter clinically deteriorated over Figure 2 CT scan showing oesophageal cancer (red a 4-week period, developing jaundice. On admis- arrow) but no obvious liver lesions. sion, he became overtly encephalopathic within 48 h, with a suggestion of acute liver failure. Bloods revealed: bilirubin 238 μmol/L, AST 1034 iu/L, GGT 569 iu/L, ALP 887 iu/L, albumin 20 g/L, PT 27.2 s and lactate 4.7 mmol/L.
    [Show full text]