Nysba Spring 2015 | Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nysba Spring 2015 | Vol NYSBA SPRING 2015 | VOL. 28 | NO. 1 International Law Practicum A publication of the International Section of the New York State Bar Association Practicing the Law of the World from New York Transcript: From the Magna Carta to Dodd-Frank: The Rule of Law and International Financial Regulation ...................................................................... 3 Islamic Banking: Some Distinguishing Regulatory Considerations ............................................................... 31 Michael J.T. McMillen Post Global Financial Crisis Regulations: E.U. and French Regulatory Efforts .............................................. 41 François Berbinau Commentary: Dodd-Frank, Magna Carta and the New Financial Services Regulatory Regime in the United Kingdom ............................................................................................................................. 49 Patrick Cook Commentary: Serious Fraud Office Annual Report Shows Progress ............................................................................ 52 Jonathan P. Armstrong Litigating in the Qatar International Court ..................................................................................................... 54 Hon. Gerald Lebovits and Delphine Miller Notes on the Reform of the Brussels Regulation Regime Regarding Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments within the European Union .................................................................................................. 65 Joseph M. Kosky Chapter News Conference Report: What’s New in International Arbitration and International Litigation: View from the Bench and International Lawyers .......................................................................... 71 Clara Flebus Law Report: The Reform of French Civil Law ...................................................................................................... 73 Luc Bigel Law Report: Modern Slavery Act and Consultation ........................................................................................... 76 André Bywater Includes Chapter News PRACTICUM: FORM AND POLICY The International Law Practicum is a semi-annual publication of the International Section of the New York State Bar As so ci a tion. The Practicum welcomes the submission of articles prepared by practicing attorneys. The length of an article, as a general rule, should not exceed 3,500 words, footnotes in clud ed. Shorter pieces, notes, reports on current or regional developments, and bibliographies are also wel- comed. All manu scripts must be sent via e-mail in Microsoft Word or WordPerfect format to the Editor- in-Chief ([email protected]). Both text and endnotes must be double-spaced. Endnotes must appear at the end of the manuscript and should conform to A Uniform System of Citation (the Har- vard Bluebook). Authors are responsible for the correctness of all citations and quotations. Manuscripts that have been accepted or published elsewhere will not be considered. The Practicum is primarily in- terested in practical issues facing law yers engaged in international practice in New York. Topics such as international trade, licensing, direct investment, fi nance, taxation, and litigation and dispute resolution are preferred. Public in ter na tion al topics will be considered to the extent that they involve private inter- national transactions or are of general interest to our readership. Manuscripts are submitted at the sender’s risk, and the New York State Bar Association, Interna- tional Section, assumes no responsibility for the return of material. Material accepted for publication becomes the property of the New York State Bar Association, International Section. No compensation is paid for any manuscript. The Practicum reserves the right (for space, budgetary, or other reasons) to move an accepted manuscript from an earlier issue to a later issue. Articles, reports and other materi- als refl ect the views of the authors or com mit tees that prepared them and do not necessarily represent the position of the New York State Bar Association, International Section, or the Editorial Board of the Practicum. Deadlines Manuscripts intended for publication in the Spring and Autumn issues must be received by the Editor-in-Chief by the preceding 1 December and 1 June, respectively. Reprints Each author will receive three complimentary copies of the Practicum issue in which the author’s material is published. Additional copies may be ordered at cost before an issue goes to press by com- municating with at the Newsletter Dept., New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, N.Y. 12207-1096 (telephone (518) 487-5671 or 487-5672) or via e-mail at [email protected]. Past Issues and Advertising Requests for back issues, advertising and subscription information and general correspondence should be sent to the Newsletter Dept., New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, N.Y. 12207-1096 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Back issues (2000 to present) of the International Law Practicum are available, in pdf format, online to Section members on the New York State Bar Association’s Web site at www.nysba.org/IntlPracticum. A searchable index is also available. 2 NYSBA International Law Practicum | Spring 2015 | Vol. 28 | No. 1 Transcript: From the Magna Carta to Dodd-Frank: The Rule of Law and International Financial Regulation [Editor’s Note: The following is an edited transcript of the An- Diane O’Connell, our amazing Meeting Chair, has as- nual Meeting of the International Section of the NYSBA on 26 sembled an impressive array of speakers here. And these January 2015 in New York City.] guys will answer all of these questions and then some. If you do have a specifi c question about Charlie, one of I. Welcoming and Introductory Remarks our speakers is also our Paris Chapter Chair, and I’m sure he’d be happy to share his thoughts. Of course, after this THOMAS PIEPER: Good morning. I’m Thomas program we’ll have our luncheon, where we hand out Pieper, Section Chair. The events of the last few weeks our awards. In the afternoon we have a meeting of Latin have highlighted how important fundamental rights and American Council, for those of you who are members. We the rule of law are and how often we just take them for canceled the Chapter Chair meeting, and instead we will granted. One of the most important milestones, of course, do snow angels outside. when it comes to the history of fundamental rights, is the Magna Carta. Written in 1215 and signed into law by [Laughter] King John I of England, who was, I think, the great, great uncle of Jonathan Armstrong. With that I’ll give the fl oor to Diane. Thank you. [Laughter] DIANE O’CONNELL: Good morning. One more piece of housekeeping. I was told if you want to connect JONATHAN ARMSTRONG: Yes. I’m waiting for to wifi , the wifi connection is Meeting Room 4, and the my lance to be restored. password is nysba2015, all lower case. I wasn’t going to give that to you because I didn’t want everyone surfi ng MR. PIEPER: The Magna Carta was basically the fi rst Google and shopping on Amazon while we were doing legal document that limited the power of the monarchy the panel. and ensured that even kings and queens would be bound by the law. Now 1215 means we also celebrate its eight [Laughter] hundredth birthday this year. There will be tons of events dedicated to this anniversary this year, and we are proud I’m not going to get into much of an introduction to be among the fi rst ones. On behalf of the International because Thomas did such a phenomenal job. I think he Section of the New York State Bar Association, we wel- pretty much said it all. So what we are going to do is run come you to our annual meeting. We are also proud that through some of the panel speakers. We’ll take a coffee we kick off this year’s annual meeting. As you have not- break, let you digest some of the information, get a little ed, we have changed the date of the meeting to Monday, more coffee to go for the second half, and then we’ll bring just to get ahead of the blizzard. the rest of the speakers up to conclude the panel and then go to lunch. [Laughter] To start out, I’ll introduce the speakers one at a time. That’s why it’s pretty quiet in the hallways. We Our fi rst speaker is Curtis Tao. He’s currently a Manag- also have a bigger room. The title of today’s session is ing Director and Associate General Counsel at CitiGroup. “From the Magna Carta to Dodd-Frank: The Rule of Law He’s advised CitiGroup on bank and bank holding com- and International Financial Regulation.” So that gives pany regulatory matters. He was an Associate General you a sense of the approach that we are going to take Counsel at Goldman as well as Cleary Gottlieb. So thank on this theme. Now I’m sure you have questions. The you, Curtis. Magna Carta and The Rule of Law, how does this relate to today’s fi nancial markets? The Dodd-Frank Act as a II. Financial Regulation in Various Parts of the modern day Magna Carta? Really? How have these regu- World lations changed the practice of international law for ev- A. The Dodd-Frank as International Magna Carta? eryone, anywhere, say in this country, the United States? In Latin America or other civil law jurisdictions? What CURTIS TAO: Thank you. Good morning to every- about Great Britain, Europe? And of course, what about one. Let me fi rst start by saying that the comments and the Middle East, Islamic fi nancing Shari`ah? And so on. thoughts which I will share today are not necessarily NYSBA International Law Practicum | Spring 2015 | Vol. 28 | No. 1 3 those of my company. And let me also be very clear, I obviously did much more than I simply summarized, but don’t expect to provide many answers, but I do hope to I’ll try to summarize some of the hot button items that elicit further thinking and discussion among this group. each did. Because, I think, as many of you know, the answers are less clear than I think at any other time in the realm of Riegle-Neal, which was passed in the early 1990s, fi nancial regulation.
Recommended publications
  • Parole Board Annual Report 2018
    Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report And Accounts 2018/19 HC 2497 Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Reports and Accounts 2018/19 Report Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 11 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Accounts Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 10 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 July 2019 HC 2497 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-1507-5 CCS0419126232 07/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office The Rt Hon David Gauke MP Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London, SW1H 9AJ 17 July 2019 Dear Justice Secretary I have pleasure in presenting to you the Parole Board’s Annual Report and Accounts for 2018/19. The Parole Board is an independent body that works with other criminal justice agencies to protect the public by risk assessing prisoners to decide whether they can be safely released into the community.
    [Show full text]
  • V1 (July 2020)
    V1 (July 2020) Membership of the Parole Board between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2020 There were 269 members in 2019/20, in totality. As at 31 March 2020, there were 264. As contained within the Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20, with the addition of full biographies. *In 2019/20 there were 90 Panel Chairs (all of whom have an * after their name to identify this) Parole Board Chair & Vice Chair Chair of London Probation Trust 2012-2014. Non- Caroline Corby Parole Board Chair. Appointed executive director of the Children and Family Court October 2018 Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), the Criminal Cases Review Commission and One Housing. Panel Chair, Nursing and Midwifery Council. His Honour Peter Rook QC Judicial Member (Vice A retired Senior Circuit Judge sitting at the Central Chair from February 2020). Appointed 2020 Criminal Court (the Old Bailey) 2005 to 2017. Formerly Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association and Head of Chambers (18 Red Lion Court). Formerly a judicial coroner. Co-author of Rook and Ward on Sexual Offences: Law and Practice (6th Edition 2021). His Honour Sir John Saunders QC* Judicial Parole Board Vice-Chair from November 2016. Member (Vice Chair until February 2020) Retired High Court Judge, retired October 2016. Appointed 2016 Formerly a presiding Judge of the South Eastern Circuit. Formerly Recorder of Birmingham. Independent Members Lindsay Addyman JP* Previous appointments Former Assistant Prisons’ Ombudsman. Member, 1987–91, 1992–98, 2000–10. New tenure 2012, Home Secretary’s Advisory Board on Restricted reappointed 2017. Patients. Chairman, IMB, HMP Full Sutton. Magistrate. Member since 2009 of the Disciplinary, Admissions and Licencing Committee for ACCA.
    [Show full text]
  • [2012] Ewhc 2606 (Qb) in the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division
    Case No: HQ111D02770 Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 2606 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 05/10/2012 Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Irfan Qadir Claimant - and - Associated Newspapers Limited Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - William Bennett (instructed by Hamlins LLP) for the Claimant Mark Warby QC and Adam Speker (instructed by Taylor Wessing LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 26 and 27 July 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JudgmentMr Justice Tugendhat : 1.This libel action is brought in respect of two articles published by the Defendant (“ANL”) in the Mail on Sunday. The first was published on 8 May 2011 (“Bank of Scotland Director ‘drove us out with dogs’”). The second was published on 19 June 2011 (“Top banker named in mortgage fraud case”). The Claimant is the director or banker referred to in each of those articles. The defences in respect of the first article include qualified privilege (both under the Defamation Act 1996 s.15 and at common law), and justification (truth). The defences in respect of the second article include absolute and qualified privilege under the Defamation Act 1996 ss.14 and 15 and justification (truth), but that defence is only in relation to the repetition in the second article of the allegations in the first article. There are pleas of malice in each case. 2.On 2 April 2012 the Master directed a trial of a preliminary issue, namely all issues of privilege and malice. This is the judgment on those issues, and only on those issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Parole Board Annual Report 2010-2011
    Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 the Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 the Parole Board for England and Wales Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 11 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 July 2011 HC1363 London: The Stationery Office £20.50 © Parole Board (2011) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context The material must be acknowledged as Parole Board copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is also for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and from our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102972672 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2441899 07/11 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum The Right Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP Justice Secretary Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London, SW1H 9AJ 11 July 2011 Dear Justice Secretary I have pleasure in presenting to you the Parole Board’s Annual Report and Accounts for 2010/11. The report records the work carried out by the Board last year to achieve our aim of making risk assessments that are rigorous, fair and timely while protecting the public and contributing to the rehabilitation of prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts the Parole Board for England And
    Annual Report and Accounts and Report Annual Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 the Parole Board for England and Wales 2009/10 the Parole Board for England and Wales Board for England and the Parole Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone Fax & E-Mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call: 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX Telephone orders/ General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Customers can also order publications from: TSO Ireland 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD Telephone orders/general enquiries: 028 9023 8451 Fax orders: 028 9023 5401 HC162 £19.75 Annual Report and Accounts the Parole Board for England and Wales 2009/10 Presented to Parliament in pursuance of paragraphs 10 and 11 of schedule 19 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 July 2010 HC162 London: The Stationery Office £19.75 © Parole Board (2010) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Parole Board copyright and the document title specified.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteen Mexicans Who Posed As Journalists from Mexico's Biggest TV
    Criminals posing as Mexican journalists found guilty of drug trafficking and money laundering - 19 December 2012 Eighteen Mexicans who posed as journalists from Mexico’s biggest TV network, Televisa, have been found guilty of organised crime by a court in Nicaragua. They were arrested in August 2012 as they tried to cross into Nicaragua in six vans, some painted with Televisa logos. They said that they had been sent to cover a high-profile murder trial but could not explain the US$9.2 million [about £5.6 million] in cash that police found in their vehicles. Televisa said that it had not sent any journalists to Nicaragua to cover the trial of people accused of involvement in the 2011 murder of Argentine folk singer Facundo Cabral. Judge Edgard Altamirano said that the seventeen men and one woman (allegedly the leader of the group) were guilty of drug trafficking, money laundering and organised crime: “The way they stashed the cash in the vehicles with the Televisa logos, the large amount of money, that’s the typical way members of organised crime act.” The defendants will be sentenced on 18 January 2013, with prosecutors seeking the maximum of thirty years. Money launderer loses human rights appeal - 19 December 2012 James Kinloch, who claimed that police had violated his human rights, has lost an appeal against a money laundering conviction. Kinloch was jailed for 30 months in 2010 over his role in a scheme to launder about £150,000 through bureaux de change, along with his son and another man. Kinloch claimed that police surveillance prior to his arrest was a violation of his right to respect for his private life, but the UK Supreme Court has ruled that he was not entitled to keep the criminal nature of his activity private.
    [Show full text]