Nysba Spring 2015 | Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Parole Board Annual Report 2018
Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report And Accounts 2018/19 HC 2497 Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Reports and Accounts 2018/19 Report Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 11 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Accounts Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 10 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 July 2019 HC 2497 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-1507-5 CCS0419126232 07/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office The Rt Hon David Gauke MP Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London, SW1H 9AJ 17 July 2019 Dear Justice Secretary I have pleasure in presenting to you the Parole Board’s Annual Report and Accounts for 2018/19. The Parole Board is an independent body that works with other criminal justice agencies to protect the public by risk assessing prisoners to decide whether they can be safely released into the community. -
V1 (July 2020)
V1 (July 2020) Membership of the Parole Board between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2020 There were 269 members in 2019/20, in totality. As at 31 March 2020, there were 264. As contained within the Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20, with the addition of full biographies. *In 2019/20 there were 90 Panel Chairs (all of whom have an * after their name to identify this) Parole Board Chair & Vice Chair Chair of London Probation Trust 2012-2014. Non- Caroline Corby Parole Board Chair. Appointed executive director of the Children and Family Court October 2018 Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), the Criminal Cases Review Commission and One Housing. Panel Chair, Nursing and Midwifery Council. His Honour Peter Rook QC Judicial Member (Vice A retired Senior Circuit Judge sitting at the Central Chair from February 2020). Appointed 2020 Criminal Court (the Old Bailey) 2005 to 2017. Formerly Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association and Head of Chambers (18 Red Lion Court). Formerly a judicial coroner. Co-author of Rook and Ward on Sexual Offences: Law and Practice (6th Edition 2021). His Honour Sir John Saunders QC* Judicial Parole Board Vice-Chair from November 2016. Member (Vice Chair until February 2020) Retired High Court Judge, retired October 2016. Appointed 2016 Formerly a presiding Judge of the South Eastern Circuit. Formerly Recorder of Birmingham. Independent Members Lindsay Addyman JP* Previous appointments Former Assistant Prisons’ Ombudsman. Member, 1987–91, 1992–98, 2000–10. New tenure 2012, Home Secretary’s Advisory Board on Restricted reappointed 2017. Patients. Chairman, IMB, HMP Full Sutton. Magistrate. Member since 2009 of the Disciplinary, Admissions and Licencing Committee for ACCA. -
[2012] Ewhc 2606 (Qb) in the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division
Case No: HQ111D02770 Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 2606 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 05/10/2012 Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Irfan Qadir Claimant - and - Associated Newspapers Limited Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - William Bennett (instructed by Hamlins LLP) for the Claimant Mark Warby QC and Adam Speker (instructed by Taylor Wessing LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 26 and 27 July 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JudgmentMr Justice Tugendhat : 1.This libel action is brought in respect of two articles published by the Defendant (“ANL”) in the Mail on Sunday. The first was published on 8 May 2011 (“Bank of Scotland Director ‘drove us out with dogs’”). The second was published on 19 June 2011 (“Top banker named in mortgage fraud case”). The Claimant is the director or banker referred to in each of those articles. The defences in respect of the first article include qualified privilege (both under the Defamation Act 1996 s.15 and at common law), and justification (truth). The defences in respect of the second article include absolute and qualified privilege under the Defamation Act 1996 ss.14 and 15 and justification (truth), but that defence is only in relation to the repetition in the second article of the allegations in the first article. There are pleas of malice in each case. 2.On 2 April 2012 the Master directed a trial of a preliminary issue, namely all issues of privilege and malice. This is the judgment on those issues, and only on those issues. -
Parole Board Annual Report 2010-2011
Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 the Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 the Parole Board for England and Wales Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 11 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 July 2011 HC1363 London: The Stationery Office £20.50 © Parole Board (2011) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context The material must be acknowledged as Parole Board copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is also for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and from our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102972672 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2441899 07/11 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum The Right Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP Justice Secretary Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London, SW1H 9AJ 11 July 2011 Dear Justice Secretary I have pleasure in presenting to you the Parole Board’s Annual Report and Accounts for 2010/11. The report records the work carried out by the Board last year to achieve our aim of making risk assessments that are rigorous, fair and timely while protecting the public and contributing to the rehabilitation of prisoners. -
Annual Report and Accounts the Parole Board for England And
Annual Report and Accounts and Report Annual Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 the Parole Board for England and Wales 2009/10 the Parole Board for England and Wales Board for England and the Parole Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone Fax & E-Mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call: 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX Telephone orders/ General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Customers can also order publications from: TSO Ireland 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD Telephone orders/general enquiries: 028 9023 8451 Fax orders: 028 9023 5401 HC162 £19.75 Annual Report and Accounts the Parole Board for England and Wales 2009/10 Presented to Parliament in pursuance of paragraphs 10 and 11 of schedule 19 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 July 2010 HC162 London: The Stationery Office £19.75 © Parole Board (2010) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Parole Board copyright and the document title specified. -
Eighteen Mexicans Who Posed As Journalists from Mexico's Biggest TV
Criminals posing as Mexican journalists found guilty of drug trafficking and money laundering - 19 December 2012 Eighteen Mexicans who posed as journalists from Mexico’s biggest TV network, Televisa, have been found guilty of organised crime by a court in Nicaragua. They were arrested in August 2012 as they tried to cross into Nicaragua in six vans, some painted with Televisa logos. They said that they had been sent to cover a high-profile murder trial but could not explain the US$9.2 million [about £5.6 million] in cash that police found in their vehicles. Televisa said that it had not sent any journalists to Nicaragua to cover the trial of people accused of involvement in the 2011 murder of Argentine folk singer Facundo Cabral. Judge Edgard Altamirano said that the seventeen men and one woman (allegedly the leader of the group) were guilty of drug trafficking, money laundering and organised crime: “The way they stashed the cash in the vehicles with the Televisa logos, the large amount of money, that’s the typical way members of organised crime act.” The defendants will be sentenced on 18 January 2013, with prosecutors seeking the maximum of thirty years. Money launderer loses human rights appeal - 19 December 2012 James Kinloch, who claimed that police had violated his human rights, has lost an appeal against a money laundering conviction. Kinloch was jailed for 30 months in 2010 over his role in a scheme to launder about £150,000 through bureaux de change, along with his son and another man. Kinloch claimed that police surveillance prior to his arrest was a violation of his right to respect for his private life, but the UK Supreme Court has ruled that he was not entitled to keep the criminal nature of his activity private.