DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Tree Experts BS5837 – Tree Surveys – Ecological Consulting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Tree Experts BS5837 – Tree Surveys – Ecological Consulting Urban Tree Experts BS5837 – Tree Surveys – Ecological Consulting ECOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT (BATS) AT HOLLYBUSH FINCHAMPSTEAD Prepared for: Mr N Blair Hollybush Lower Wokingham Road Finchampstead Berkshire RG45 6BX 12th June 2017 Ref: SPH/ESR-01/12-06 Urban Tree Experts, Unit H Bridge Farm, Reading Road, Arborfield, Berkshire, RG2 9HT Tel: 0118 976 2904 Urban Tree Experts BBS5837 – Tree Surveys – Ecological Consulting Unit H Bridge Farm Reading Road Arborfield Reading Berkshire RG2 9HT Tel: 0118 976 2902 Mobile: 07557 982091 Email: [email protected] CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Instruction 5 1.2 Aims and Objectives 5 1.3 Proposed Works 5 1.4 Surveyor Background and Experience 5 2 Survey Methodology 6 2.1 Constructions/Limitations 6 2.2 Dusk and Dawn Surveys 6 3 Survey Findings 7 3.1 Dusk and Dawn Surveys 7 4 Conclusions/Interpretation 9 5 Outline Method Statement for Planning 10 6 References 12 7 Queries 12 Appendix 1 Appendix 2 ©2017 Urban Tree Experts All rights in this report are reserved. No part of it may be reproduced, edited or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without our written permission. Its content and format are for the exclusive use of Mr N Blair or his agents in dealing with this site. It may not be sold, lent, hired out or divulged to any third party not directly involved in this site without the written consent of Urban Tree Experts. It may be reproduced as part of a planning application. The validity of this report ceases at the prescribed time limit or after two years from the site inspection, or if the site conditions change due to unspecified works that affect the site whichever is the sooner. Registered Office: Unit H Bridge Farm, Reading Road, Arborfield, Reading Berkshire, RG2 9HT Registered in England and Wales – Number 7106204 2 Urban Tree Experts BS5837 – Tree Surveys – Ecological Consulting EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Urban Tree Experts was commissioned by Mr N Blair to carry out two dusk emergence and a dawn return to roost survey at Hollybush, Lower Wokingham Road, Finchampstead, Berkshire RG45 6BX. This is to support a current planning application to Wokingham Borough Council that seeks to demolish the existing house, bungalow and outbuildings and erect two, five bedroomed detached dwellings with linked garages. Externally and internally the house is in a good condition and is occupied. Whilst the roof, lead flashing, fascias and soffits are all well sealed, the building has been used by bats, as evident by a small number of bat droppings located in the loft, behind the front right hand gable end, indicating that bats have used the house to roost. The bat droppings were sent for DNA testing by Warwick University and the results identified them to be those of the brown long-eared bat (BLE), see Appendix 1. Due to the various constraints internally within the loft void during the inspection and the potential for roosting opportunities, there is a medium to high risk of bats being present during the optimum period of bat activity, May to September. Three further surveys were undertaken at Hollybush and provided further information on the presence or absence of bats at the site, information on the status of bats using the building, to establish the aappropriate mitigation for the proposed works and to determine if a European Protected Species (EPS) licence is required. The dusk emergence surveys were conducted on Sunday 7th May and Monday 12th June 2017 and the dawn re-entry survey was conducted on Monday 22nd May 2017. Whilst there was considerable bat activity around the house and garden, no bats were seen to leave or enter the any of the buildings. Additional survey effort in the form of a SMBat4 FS detector and IR trail camera were deployed between the 10th May and 31st May to monitor the loft void where the droppings were located, no bat calls or bats were detected. A search of the Berkshire & South Buckinghamshire bat group records confirmed 7 different species within the 2 kilometer search radius, a summary of the records are included at Appendix 2. A 2 kilometer search of the surrounding area on the Magic interactive website revealed three local nature reserves (Heathlake, Ambarrow Court and Edgbarrow Woods) and one Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) – Heath Lake. It also revealed 22 European Protected Species (EPS) licences have been granted since 2009, 14 of which were for BLE bats. This report confirms the findings of the surveys, completed by an experienced licensed bat ecologist, in accordance with current best practice guidance where possible, and outlines any ecological constraints or issues with the proposed works. 3 Urban Tree Experts BS5837 – Tree Surveys – Ecological Consulting Despite no bats being seen emerging from or re-entering any of the buildings the site surroundings and details revealed from the Magic interactive search indicate that there is a high likelihood that BLE bats may occupy the building after this survey and that in the short term, in the absence of mitigation, the demolition of the house will result in the damage/destruction of a roost, the disturbance and/or alteration of access points, and the potential disturbance, killing, or injury of any resident bats. However there is no reason why continued roosting provision at the site cannot be successfully maintained and or enhanced in the long term with appropriate provision made within an EPS method statement and therefore an EPS licence must be obtained from Natural England before works commence at Hollybush. An outline method statement has been included to enable the Local Planning Authority to have regards to the requirements of the Habitats Directive… in the exercise of their functions in considering the planning application. A full method statement will be prepared as part of an EPS licence application to be submitted to Natural England. 4 Urban Tree Experts BS5837 – Tree Surveys – Ecological Consulting 1. Introduction 1.1 Instruction Urban Tree Experts was commissioned by Mr N Blair to carry out two dusk emergence and a dawn return to roost survey at Hollybush, Lower Wokingham Road, Finchampstead, Berkshire RG45 6BX. 1.2 Aims and Objectives The dusk and dawn surveys are designed to: Identify the presence/likely absence of bats using the building to roost. Estimate the size and status of any existing bat roost within the building. Determine the potential impacts on any bat roost from the proposed development. The emergence survey was carried out in accordance with Bat Surveys for Professional Ecologists: Good Practice Guidelines (3rd edition). 1.3 Proposed Works The surveys were commissioned in connection with a current planning application to Wokingham Borough Council, ref 171374, that seeks to demolish the existing house, bungalow and outbuildings and erect two, five bedroomed detached dwellings with linked garages. 1.4 Surveyor Background and Experience The surveys were conducted by Bridget Parslow (7/5/17 and 22/5/17), Elaine Charlson (7/5/17, 22/5/17 and 12/6/17), Alastair (Ali) Barnes (7/5/17, 22/5/17, 12/6/17), Matt Baillie (7/5/17) and Peter Smith (12/6/17/17) and the report was completed by Simon Holmes, MSc, a Natural England licenced bat ecologist. Simon Holmes has 27 years’ experience of carrying out bat surveys and bat conservation work and has attended numerous training courses run by the Bat Conservation Trust, Wildwood Ecology, local bat groups and individual ecologists, he holds Class 2, 3 and 4 Bat Licence (No.CLSO03440). Bridget Parslow has 29 years’ experience of carrying out bat surveys, bat care and bat conservation work and has attended numerous training courses, she holds both RV and Survey licence numbers CLS 10324 and 10391 respectively. Ali Barnes has been surveying bats for five years and has received training in surveying techniques, bat detector (EM3 and Batlogger M) use, and echolocation analysis. He holds a Class 2 Bat Licence number C143559. Elaine Charlson and Peter Smith have been surveying bats for 3+ years with Urban Tree Experts and have received training in surveying techniques, bat detector (EM3, SM2 and Batlogger M) use and echolocation analysis. Matt Baillie is a new surveyor who was shadowing Bridget Parslow for experience. 5 Urban Tree Experts BS5837 – Tree Surveys – Ecological Consulting 2. Survey Methodology 2.1 Constraints/Limitations There were no constraints or limitations to the surveys and the weather conditions at the time were appropriate for bat activity surveys and bats were observed foraging during the surveys. 2.2 Dusk and Dawn Surveys Two dusk emergence surveys were conducted on the evenings of Sunday 7th May and Monday 12th June 2017 and the dawn return to roost survey was conducted on Monday 22nd May 2017. The surveys were at a time of year when active bats are most likely to be present. Weather conditions were suitable for the bat surveys, being conducted during warm weather and when bats were likely to be active. A static detector and automated infrared camera were installed within the loft where the droppings were observed to monitor bat activity. They were installed on the 10th May and recovered on the 1st June 2017. The surveyors were stationed around the building (as shown in Figure 1), to ensure the features identified in the preliminary bat report could be observed. During the surveys bat activity was monitored using BatLogger M and Echo Meter Touch bat detectors together with a FLIR T1020 thermal camera and a Sony Handycam video camera. The detectors and camera were fitted with SD cards for recording bat activity, allowing for later analysis with Kaleidoscope Pro 3 software and BLC media player.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South East Bedfordshire
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2007 Post-determination & Research Version 4.1 South East Bedfordshire Bedford (E.09.3101) SP94305245 AIP database ID: {571EF0F6-021A-41D1-9133-52A0EAFE31D4} Parish: Turvey Postal Code: MK43 8DB ALL SAINTS' CHURCH, TURVEY Archaeological Observation & Recording Ingham, D Bedford : Albion Archaeology , 2007, 4pp, colour pls, figs Work undertaken by: Albion Archaeology A watching brief was undertaken on groundwork associated with improvements. No features or deposits of archaeological significance were discovered, probably due to the fact that the service trenches were not deep enough to encounter archaeological remains. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: UD OASIS ID :albionar1-35955 Mid Bedfordshire (E.09.3102) SP92173930 AIP database ID: {3B436FB9-431E-4FCF-BFF1-CDB7FE4267DC} Parish: Hulcote and Salford Postal Code: MK17 8BU M1 BROUGHTON BROOK OUTFALL M1 Broughton Brook Outfall, Bedfordshire Turner, I Bedford : Albion Archaeology, 2007, Work undertaken by: Albion Archaeology A programme of archaeological observation, investigation and recording was undertaken by Albion Archaeology on engineering works at the M1 Broughton Brook outfall, Bedfordshire. The site lies within an area of archaeological potential, in the vicinity of cropmarks possibly dating to the later prehistoric or Roman periods. Other significant archaeological remains are also located in the surrounding landscape. The engineering works comprised the excavation of a foundation trench for a penstock, and the re-profiling of a length of drainage ditch. No archaeological features, deposits or artefact were revealed during the engineering works. Deep excavations were only carried out for the penstock foundation trench where only geological deposits were encountered. Any potential remains present in the vicinity of the drainage ditch were unlikely to be revealed due to the limited nature of the works in that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Bracknell Forest Ramblers Route
    This broad, straight track is part of a Follow a cinder track for 350 yards (315m) and then turn left off the footpath by some white fencing, where Location map Roman road which once linked London Section 1 you’ll follow an old tarmac road for a further 350 yards. Turn right just after the gas pumping station and follow a with the Roman town of Silchester. Even Ramblers route bridleway, which runs parallel to power lines, in a westerly direction, crossing a stream at one point. Stay on this The Look Out to Wildmoor Heath: though the Romans constructed the road, path for 0.8 miles (1.3 km) until you reach the Crowthorne to Sandhurst road. 4.5 miles (7.2 km) local people who lived here after the Roman Introduction Occupation believed that only the Devil could Numbered text relates to numbered route The Ramblers Route have been responsible for such a feat of sections in the maps. engineering - hence its name. is 26 mile/ 41.8km Section 1 The Look Out Discovery Centre is open daily circular walking trail Continue straight along the Devil’s Highway, and provides many attractions for the family, drop down a slope to a gate and follow the that passes through with over 90 science and nature exhibits. The track beneath the route of the Sandhurst- attractive countryside Look Out is situated on the edge of Swinley Crowthorne bypass. About 175 yards (160m) on the outskirts of Forest which is the largest area of unbroken beyond the bypass, turn left onto a footpath woodland (mostly Scots Pine) in Berkshire at and head south.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowthorne Neighbourhood Plan
    CROWTHORNE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018 – 2036 Millennium Garden photo (Source: Crowthorne Parish Council archives) June 2021 CROWTHORNE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018-2036 1 Guide to Reading this Plan Of necessity, this Neighbourhood Plan is a detailed technical document. The purpose of this page is to explain the structure and help you find your way around the plan. 1. Introduction & Background This section explains the background to this Neighbourhood Plan. 2. The Neighbourhood Area This section details many of the features of the designated area. 3. Planning Policy Context This rather technical section relates this Plan to the National Planning Policy Framework and the planning policies of Bracknell Forest Council. 4. Community Views on Planning Issues This section explains the community involvement that has taken place. 5. Vision, Objectives & Land Use Policies This is the key section. Firstly, it provides a statement on the Neighbourhood Plan Vision and Objectives. It then details Policies which are to address the issues outlined in the Foreword and in Section 4. These Policies are listed on page 5. There are Policy Maps at the back of the plan and additional information in the Appendices to which the policies cross reference. 6. Implementation This section explains how the Plan will be implemented and future development guided and managed. It suggests projects which might be supported by the Community Infrastructure Levy which the Parish Council will have some influence over. Finally, it deals with a number of issues which although relevant are outside the scope of a Neighbourhood Plan. CROWTHORNE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018-2036 2 CROWTHORNE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018 – 2036 CONTENTS Foreword List of Policies 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Template
    Unrestricted LOCAL COUNTRYSIDE ACCESS FORUM 3 MARCH 2015 7.00 - 9.25 PM Present: Members: Michael Abbott (Chairman) Councillor Michael Brossard John Deakin Councillor John Porter Peter Radband Jenny Yung In attendance: Graham Pockett, Parks & Countryside Development Officer Robert Solomon, Ranger (Countryside and PROW) Richard Walton, Head of Parks & Countryside Rose Wicks, Parks & Countryside Projects Officer Observers: Colin Bird, member of public Colin Patient, Mid & West Berks LAF Apologies for absence were received from: Hugh Fitzwilliams Richard Mosses 12. Welcome 13. Minutes of Last Meeting and Matters Arising The minutes of the meeting held on 30 September 2014 were agreed as a correct record, subject to the following amendment: Minute 4: ‘There was a National Conference held in Bristol on 4 February 2014’ (rather than 2015). 14. Membership and Recruitment Sharon Holt, who had an equestrian background, had resigned from the Forum. Jenny Yung on the Forum had a similar equestrian background. Officers would write to Sharon to thank her for her work on the Forum. (Action: Richard Walton) Innes McEwen had stepped down from the Forum since leaving Syngenta. Julia Emburey was in an interim role at Syngenta and was invited to Forum meetings. Bracknell Forest Council (BFC) officers would continue to promote Forum recruitment and membership online, at careers fairs and in the local media. Forum members were requested to spread the word as well. Suggestions for advertising included SPA wardens and the Forestry Commission. (Action: Rose Wicks/ All) 15. National and Regional LAF Work Mike Abbott attended a Berkshire Local Access Forum (LAF) Chairs’ meeting in February, which was also attended by Rose Wicks.
    [Show full text]
  • Bracknell Forest
    Landscape Character Area A1: Bracknell Forest Map 1: Location of Landscape Character Area A1 22 Image 1: Typical landscape of conifer plantation and new mixed broadleaf plantation on former heathland, with Round Hill in Crowthorne Wood in the middle distance, looking north from the Devil’s Highway at grid reference: 484936 164454. Location 5.3 This character area comprises a large expanse of forest plantation between the settlements of Bracknell to the north, Crowthorne and Sandhurst to the west, Camberley to the south (outside the study area within Surrey) and South Ascot to the east. The landscape continues into the Forested Settled Sands landscape type in Wokingham to the west and the Settled Wooded Sands in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead to the east. Key Characteristics • Large areas of forestry plantation interspersed with broadleaf woodland and limited areas of open heath, giving a sense of enclosure and remoteness. • Typically short views, contained by trees, with occasional long views along historic, straight rides (such as the Devils’ Highway) and glimpsed views from more elevated areas. • A very low settlement density and few transport corridors. Suburban settlement and development related to light-industry occur at its peripheries, but these are mostly well screened by trees and not discernible from the interior. • Well-used recreation areas valued by the local community, including provisions for a range of formal recreational uses. • Despite the non-native land cover and presence of forestry operations the area has a sense of remoteness; a sense of removal from the surrounding urban settlements and a connection to the history of Windsor Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Basin Heaths SPA Technical Background Document Appendix 8
    Thames Basin Heaths SPA – Technical Background Document to the Core Strategy DPD JUNE 2007 Appendix 8 – Full assessment of open space 111 Thames Basin Heaths SPA – Technical Background Document to the Core Strategy DPD JUNE 2007 The following sites are those which have been considered to be suitable as alternative areas of recreation to the SPA. ‘THE CUT’ CLUSTER The Cut Cluster consists of: Jock's Copse, Tinker's Copse, The Cut (south), Garth Meadows, Larks Hill and Piggy Wood. The size of the ‘Cut Cluster’ lends itelf to a 5km catchment zone as shown below: 112 Thames Basin Heaths SPA – Technical Background Document to the Core Strategy DPD JUNE 2007 Site Name Jock's Copse / Tinker's Copse / The Cut (south) OS Co-ordinates SU 857 704 Area 3.63 hectares Typology E / F (urban woodland / green corridor) Ward Binfield With Warfield PPG17 Ref No’s 70, 141, 135 PPG17 Audit Jocks Copse – 40% Average Tinkers Copse – 45% Average The Cut (South) – 39% Average Features A generally naturalistic site (Bracknell Forest Borough Council, 2002) comprising a small copse (100% wooded cover) in a residential area combined with linear open space alongside the Cut river corridor (40% wooded). Both Tinkers Copse and Jock’s Copse consist of areas of ancient woodland which used to be set in an open rural farmland landscape. House building in the 1990s enclosed the copses, which had been derelict and unmanaged for quite some time prior to this. Nature Conservation Interests The area now provides a valuable wildlife oasis within the urban area, with primroses and carpets of bluebells in the Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report
    The Birds of Berkshire Annual Report 2012 Published 2015 Berkshire Ornithological Club Registered charity no. 1011776 The Berkshire Ornithological Club (BOC) was founded as Reading Ornithological Club in 1947 to promote education and study of wild birds, their habitats and their conservation, initially in the Reading area but now on a county wide basis. It is affiliated to the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO). Membership is open to anyone interested in birds and bird-watching, beginner or expert, local patch enthusiast or international twitcher. The Club provides the following in return for a modest annual subscription: • A programme of indoor meetings with expert groups such as Friends of Lavell’s Lake, speakers on ornithological subjects Theale Area Bird Conservation Group and Moor Green Lakes Group. • Occasional social meetings • Opportunities to participate in survey • An annual photographic competition of very work to help understand birds better. The high standard surveys include supporting the BTO in its • A programme of field meetings both locally work and monitoring for local conservation and further afield. These can be for half days, management. whole days or weekends. • The Club runs the Birds of Berkshire • Regular mid week bird walks in and around Conservation Fund to support local bird many of Berkshire’s and neighbouring conservation projects. counties’ best bird-watching areas. • Exclusive access to the pre-eminent site Queen Mother Reservoir (subject to permit) • Conservation involvement in important local habitats and species. BOC members are involved in practical conservation work with This Berkshire Bird Report is published by the Club and provided free to members.
    [Show full text]
  • 140916 Mccracken -Thames Basin Heaths
    Unrestricted TO: EXECUTIVE MEMBER FOR CULTURE, CORPORATE SERVICES AND PUBLIC PROTECTION 26 SEP 2014 THAMES BASIN HEATHS SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA MINI PLAN EXPENDITURE Director of Environment, Culture & Communities 1 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 To update the list of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspaces (SANGs). 2 RECOMMENDATION(S) 2.1 That the list of SANGs is updated to comprise: Ambarrow Court and Hill Edmunds Green Group (incorporating adjacent green spaces including Whitegrove Copse, Bluebell Hill, The Chestnuts and Harvest Hill) Englemere Pond Horseshoe Lake Great Hollands Recreation Ground (part of) Longhill Park Group (incorporating adjacent green spaces including Milman Close, Beswick Gardens Copse and Clintons Hill) Lily Hill Park Popes Meadow Shepherd Meadows The Cut Countryside Corridor (comprising Larks Hill, Garth Meadows, Jock’s Copse, Tinker’s Copse, Piggy Wood, the Cut Riverside Path and Anneforde Place) 3 REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION(S) 3.1 The provision of alternative recreational land to attract new residents away from the SPA is a key part of avoiding the effects of new development on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Without appropriate SANGs in place, Bracknell Forest Council would not be able to facilitate new residential development. 3.2 Within Bracknell Forest there are two ways for developers to provide new SANGs: a) Make a payment contribution towards strategic SANGs (subject to available SANGs capacity) b) Make an in-kind, bespoke provision (based upon defined principles) 3.3 This relates specifically to adopted policy; particularly The Bracknell Forest Council Core Strategy DPD (February 2008). Policy CS14 Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area identifies that “…..Development outside the 400-metre zone will be permitted where it can demonstrate that it can remove any adverse effect by contributing towards avoidance and mitigation measures……..
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic List Bird Report for 2006 and 2007
    SyStematic LiSt Bird report for 2006 and 2007 The species accounts for the systematic lists for 2006 and 2007 were prepared by Paul Bright-Thomas, Brian Clews, Richard Crawford, Ken Moore, Bill Nicoll, Sarah Priest, Marek Walford and Ken White. Contributors of records to the systematic lists are usually identified by initials: a table of names and initials is shown at the end of the lists. The systematic lists for 2006 and 2007 were edited by Chris Heard. abbreviations and place names Abbreviations used in the systematic lists are shown below. For place names difficulties arise where there are several names for the same sites including where, for example, a gravel pit complex is named but not the individual pit . A map and guide to the main sites is included towards the end of the report to assist with identification and further detail can be found at www.berksbirds.co.uk/pits.asp. age/Sex PlaceS/LocaLitieS ad adult com Common f/s First summer CP Country Park f/w First winter (plumage) fm Farm imm Immature GC Golf course juv Juvenile GP Gravel Pit(s) s/p Summer plumage K&a Kennet and Avon s/s Second summer res Reservoir s/w Second winter r. River w/p Winter plumage Sf Sewage Farm w Winter StW Sewage Treatment Works 3/s Third summer dorney W Dorney Wetlands 3/w Third winter QMR Queen Mother Reservoir 4/s Fourth summer 19 2006 Bird report for 2006 mUte SWaN Cygnus olor Locally common resident Monthly maxima at the main sites were: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Burghfield GPs 26 24 8 6 – – – – 58 81 87 49 Dinton Pastures CP 74 55 19 2 2 10 5 45 60 3 70 36 K&A Canal Newbury 69 58 73 – 88 57 – 27 42 87 – 97 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowthorne Neighbourhood Plan Submission Version July 2019
    CROWTHORNE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018 – 2036 SUBMISSION PLAN Millennium Garden photo (Source: Crowthorne Parish Council archives) Published by Crowthorne Parish Council for Pre-Submission consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended). July 2019 CROWTHORNE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN: SUBMISSION PLAN – JULY 2019 1 Guide to Reading this Plan Of necessity, this Neighbourhood Plan is a detailed technical document. The purpose of this page is to explain the structure and help you find your way around the plan. 1. Introduction & Background This section explains the background to this Neighbourhood Plan and how you can take part in and respond to the consultation. 2. The Neighbourhood Area This section details many of the features of the designated area. 3. Planning Policy Context This rather technical section relates this Plan to the National Planning Policy Framework and the planning policies of Bracknell Forest Council. 4. Community Views on Planning Issues This section explains the community involvement that has taken place. 5. Vision, Objectives & Land Use Policies This is the key section. Firstly, it provides a statement on the Neighbourhood Plan Vision and Objectives. It then details Policies which are proposed to address the issues outlined in the Foreword and in Section 4. These Policies are listed on page 5. There are Policy Maps at the back of the plan and additional information in the Appendices to which the policies cross reference. 6. Implementation This section explains how the Plan will be implemented and future development guided and managed. It suggests projects which might be supported by the Community Infrastructure Levy which the Parish Council will have some influence over.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C – Ward and Parish Tables
    Appendix C – Ward and Parish Tables Table C1: Primary, Secondary and Third sites within Typology B by Ward Typology (Number) Ward Ref / Site 1st 2nd 3rd 19 / Blackmoor Pond 46 / Englemere Pond 86 / Longhill Park 132 / Swinley Park 146 / Wentworth Way / Ascot Priory woodland Ascot 7 3 0 366 / Swinley Forest 367 / Swinley Forest 49 / Farley Copse 66 / Hitherhooks Copse 70 / Jock's Copse 75 / Knox Green 82 / Larks Hill 133 / Temple Copse 141 / Tinker's Copse 149 / Wicks Green Binfield with Warfield 15 2 0 162b / Peacock Meadows (Jennett's Park) 165 / Wykery Copse 185 / Foxley Lane (Nash Pond) 187 / Newbold College (Popeswood Road) 284 / Cabbage Hill 332 / Big Wood (Binfield) 361 / Silver Jubilee Fields 20 / Bluebell Hill 32 / Clinton's Hill 90 / Milman Close 4 2 0 192 / Beswick Gardens Bullbrook Central Sandhurst 1 0 0 150 / Wildmoor Heath 14 / Berrybank Copse 2 0 0 College Town 122 / Shepherd Meadows 57 / Garswood 119 / Savernake Park 213 / Bagshot Road (Woodland off Chesterblade Lane) 214 / Garswood, Bagshot Road 6 2 1 215 / Opladen Way, Garswood 216 / Garswood Crown Wood 25 / Caesar's Camp 31 / Circle Hill Woodland 35 / Crowthorne Woods 92 / Napier Close 131 / Swinley Forest 151 / Wildmoor Heath 173 / Brookers Row 256 / Swinley Forest Crowthorne 21 0 0 257 / Swinley Forest 258 / Swinley Forest 259 / Swinley Forest 260 / Swinley Forest 261 / Swinley Forest 268 / Swinley Forest - Forester's Way 269 / Swinley Forest - Forester's Way 270 / Broadmoor woodland 271 / Broadmoor woodland Typology (Number) Ward Ref / Site 1st 2nd 3rd 283 / Next
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document For
    Quarterly Service Reports (Pack of 4) Quarter Ending: Saturday 30 June 2018 1. Quarterly Service Report - Adult Social Care, Health and Housing: 3 - 24 Quarter 1, 2018-2019 2. Quarterly Service Report - Children, Young People & Learning: 25 - 54 Quarter 1, 2018-2019 3. Quarterly Service Report - Environment, Culture and 55 - 90 Communities: Quarter 1, 2018-2019 4. Quarterly Service Report - Resources: Quarter 1, 2018-2019 91 - 122 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 1 QUARTERLY SERVICE REPORT ADULT SOCIAL CARE, HEALTH & HOUSING Q1 2018 - 19 April - June 2018 Executive Member: Councillor Dale Birch Director: Gill Vickers 15th August 2018 V6 3 Contents Section 1: Where we are now ............................................................................................... 3 Section 2: Strategic Themes ................................................................................................. 5 Value for money ............................................................................................................................... 5 People live active & healthy lifestyles ........................................................................................... 6 A clean, green, growing and sustainable place ......................................................................... 11 Strong, safe, supportive and self-reliant communities .............................................................. 12 Section 3: Operational Priorities ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]